DOCSLIB.ORG

17-Th International Avacha Ski Marathon Petropavlovsk

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
17-Th International Avacha Ski Marathon Petropavlovsk 17-th International Avacha ski marathon Russian Marathon Cup "RUSSIALOPPET" Grand-Pri Supercup Russian Marathon Cup "RUSSIALOPPET" Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy (RUSSIA) Cross-country skiing April, 18, 2010 Men 60 km free style Official results Start: 10:30 a.m. Finish: 04:00 p.m. Jury Track description TD G. Kadykov Moscow track: marathon TD assistant V. Fedorov Murmansk height drop: 150 m maximum climb : 77 m Chief judge V. Marikov P-Kamchatskiy total climb: 704m Head of skiing stadium Y.Kurakin P-Kamchatskiy track length: 30 km Head of skiing tracks A. Miroshnichenko P-Kamchatskiy quantity of tracks: 2 Rank Group Bib Name DOB Rating Country/region, Club Time Lagging Rating given 1 М0 6 Ivanov Alexey 1980 МСМК Belorussia, Vitebsk 2:27:08.0 0:00:00.0 2 М1 1 Berger Larce 1979 Norway 2:27:12.0 0:00:04.0 3 М0 2 Os Alexander 1980 Norway 2:27:14.0 0:00:06.0 4 М1 8 Nesterov Vadim 1979 МС Zlatoust 2:27:14.1 0:00:06.1 5 М0 121 Ignatyev Konstantin 1986 МС Pionerskiy settlement 2:27:21.0 0:00:13.0 6 М0 4 Khodyrev Dmitriy 1980 МС Yugra settlement 2:27:27.0 0:00:19.0 7 М0 105 Gulyayev Ivan 1987 МС Gorno-Altaysk 2:34:05.0 0:06:57.0 8 М2 87 Drygin Konstantin 1973 МС Pervouralsk 2:34:06.0 0:06:58.0 9 М0 185 Palnikov Alexander 1987 КМС Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk 2:35:04.0 0:07:56.0 10 М0 11 Glebov Maxim 1984 МС Yelizovo 2:36:04.0 0:08:56.0 11 М2 19 Yeremenko Edward 1974 МС Yelizovo 2:36:50.0 0:09:42.0 12 М2 22 Kozlov Yuriy 1970 МС Tolyati 2:36:56.0 0:09:48.0 13 М1 12 Abakumov Nikolay 1979 МС Yelizovo 2:39:39.0 0:12:31.0 14 М0 10 Kulakon Andrey 1982 МС Kolomna, Moscow region 2:40:50.0 0:13:42.0 15 М0 111 Andrutskiy Andrey 1991 КМС P-Kamchatsky 2:40:52.0 0:13:44.0 16 М4 24 Afanasyev Stanislav 1963 КМС P-Kamchatsky 2:41:15.0 0:14:07.0 17 М2 27 Fyedorov Andrey 1970 МС P-Kamchatsky 2:42:22.0 0:15:14.0 18 М0 26 Mazalov Maxim 1985 МС Tolyati 2:43:00.0 0:15:52.0 19 М0 37 Krayushkin Vitaliy 1988 I P-Kamchatsky 2:43:35.0 0:16:27.0 20 М0 21 Turukin Yevgeniy 1981 КМС Vilyuchinsk 2:44:11.0 0:17:03.0 21 М5 25 Usatov Alexander 1959 МС Moscow 2:45:16.0 0:18:08.0 22 М0 33 Kolesnikov Konstantin 1989 I Komsomolsk 2:45:23.0 0:18:15.0 23 М0 30 Kotov Nikita 1992 КМС Milkovo settlement 2:46:30.0 0:19:22.0 24 М4 18 Igumnov Nikolay 1964 МС Moscow 2:46:46.0 0:19:38.0 25 М2 15 Yeremeyev Andrey 1974 МС P-Kamchatsky 2:46:58.0 0:19:50.0 26 М1 29 Shestopalov Dmitriy 1975 МС Tolyati 2:48:06.0 0:20:58.0 27 М0 133 Dutov Nikolay 1991 I Yelizovo 2:50:25.0 0:23:17.0 28 М3 52 Amangaliyev Vladimir 1966 КМС Yelizovo 2:50:36.0 0:23:28.0 29 М3 150 Yahin Renat 1968 Okha, Sakhalin region 2:50:50.0 0:23:42.0 30 М2 63 Kadykov Georgiy 1970 КМС Dubna, Moscow region 2:50:52.0 0:23:44.0 31 М2 47 Ivanov Alexander 1970 I Dubna, Moscow region 2:50:52.1 0:23:44.1 32 М2 32 Smutin Valeriy 1970 I St Petersburg 2:51:20.0 0:24:12.0 33 М5 49 Slugin Alexander 1956 МС P-Kamchatsky 2:51:43.0 0:24:35.0 34 М0 242 Rogozin Sergey 1986 КМС P-Kamchatsky 2:52:02.0 0:24:54.0 35 М3 42 Malorodov Sergey 1965 I P-Kamchatsky 2:52:18.0 0:25:10.0 36 М4 38 Chekolayev Vladimir 1961 КМС P-Kamchatsky 2:52:38.0 0:25:30.0 37 М1 53 Ratynskiy Dmitriy 1975 I Sergiyev Posad 2:53:51.0 0:26:43.0 38 М0 44 Yamschikov Dmitiry 1986 КМС P-Kamchatsky 2:55:15.0 0:28:07.0 39 М5 16 Zaharenko Igor 1956 I Krasnoznamensk, Moscow region 2:55:38.0 0:28:30.0 40 М2 54 Shorin Maxim 1971 I Moscow 2:57:51.0 0:30:43.0 41 М2 99 Sherstobitov Andrey 1972 I P-Kamchatsky 2:57:52.0 0:30:44.0 42 М4 41 Miroshnichenko Alexander 1963 КМС P-Kamchatsky 2:58:58.0 0:31:50.0 43 М4 43 Ulyankin Victor 1960 МС P-Kamchatsky 2:59:25.0 0:32:17.0 44 М0 55 Kovrigin Maxim 1989 I P-Kamchatsky 2:59:26.0 0:32:18.0 45 М0 102 Kharitonchik Maxim 1991 КМС P-Kamchatsky 2:59:58.0 0:32:50.0 46 М4 171 Kostygin Valentin 1961 P-Kamchatsky 3:01:04.0 0:33:56.0 47 М2 28 Shipilov Vladimir 1973 МС Penza 3:01:31.0 0:34:23.0 48 М1 64 Zhukov Andrey 1976 Moscow 3:01:32.0 0:34:24.0 49 М0 157 Sutyagin Andrey 1980 КМС Yekaterinburg 3:01:42.0 0:34:34.0 50 М6 36 Slugin Victor 1953 МС P-Kamchatsky 3:01:43.0 0:34:35.0 51 М1 57 Ulatov Anton 1977 I P-Kamchatsky 3:01:54.0 0:34:46.0 52 М4 90 Rumyantsev Ivan 1964 I Perm 3:01:57.0 0:34:49.0 53 М0 59 Kravchenko Dmitriy 1991 I Milkovo settlement 3:02:26.0 0:35:18.0 54 М1 250 Shalimov Michael 1976 Electrostal 3:02:52.0 0:35:44.0 55 М0 39 Nedobezhkin Ilya 1991 I P-Kamchatsky 3:03:10.0 0:36:02.0 56 М1 78 Sazonov Alexey 1977 I Tolyati 3:03:20.0 0:36:12.0 57 М4 106 Konovalov Alexander 1961 I Moscow 3:04:04.0 0:36:56.0 58 М1 143 Savohin Pavel 1979 I Zheleznodorozhniy 3:04:15.0 0:37:07.0 59 М5 142 Yedemskiy Vasiliy 1958 Moscow 3:04:57.0 0:37:49.0 60 М0 204 Koval Yevgeniy 1983 1 P-Kamchatsky 3:05:20.0 0:38:12.0 61 М2 73 Checkmezov Andrey 1972 КМС Yaroslavl 3:05:22.0 0:38:14.0 62 М0 175 Schitov Andrey 1985 I Yubileyniy, Moscow region 3:06:02.0 0:38:54.0 63 М1 176 Tripaka Sergey 1979 КМС Yubileyniy, Moscow region 3:06:14.0 0:39:06.0 64 М5 95 Kuzmenko Vladimir 1955 МС Khabarovsk 3:06:20.0 0:39:12.0 65 М4 170 Kutolin Oleg 1964 P-Kamchatsky 3:07:02.0 0:39:54.0 66 М4 68 Rumyantsev Yuriy 1962 I P-Kamchatsky 3:07:42.0 0:40:34.0 67 М0 96 Kondratyuk Anatoliy 1980 I Sophrino-1 settlement, Moscow region 3:08:00.0 0:40:52.0 68 М4 118 Voskovskiy Sergey 1964 Belgorod 3:08:28.0 0:41:20.0 69 М5 89 Fyodorov Valeriy 1958 МС Murmansk 3:08:51.0 0:41:43.0 70 М4 17 Gorev Kirill 1963 Kuzmolovskiy settlement, Leningrad region 3:09:28.0 0:42:20.0 71 М2 79 Grebennik Andrey 1972 P-Kamchatsky 3:09:49.0 0:42:41.0 72 М0 108 Sazonov Semyon 1987 КМС P-Kamchatsky 3:10:16.0 0:43:08.0 73 М3 178 Lavrushin Alexander 1967 I Klimovsk, Moscow region 3:10:31.0 0:43:23.0 74 М4 227 Sergeyev Oleg 1961 I Komsomolsk 3:10:32.0 0:43:24.0 75 М1 91 Buhmarov Alexander 1977 Zaprudnya settlement, Moscow region 3:10:40.0 0:43:32.0 76 М3 80 Komarets Anatoliy 1969 I Zelenograd, Moscow region 3:10:51.0 0:43:43.0 77 М5 223 Marahovskiy Alexander 1959 I Nickolayevsk 3:11:06.0 0:43:58.0 78 М6 114 Chudinov Anatoliy 1950 P-Kamchatsky 3:11:19.0 0:44:11.0 79 М0 236 Belyayev Denis 1992 I Esso settlement 3:11:34.0 0:44:26.0 80 М2 117 Fomchenko Alexander 1973 I P-Kamchatsky 3:12:12.0 0:45:04.0 81 М4 75 Kryukov Vladimir 1962 I Moscow 3:12:15.0 0:45:07.0 82 М4 127 Ignatov Sergey 1960 I Aprelevka, Moscow region 3:12:33.0 0:45:25.0 83 М2 100 Zheltov Alexey 1972 P-Kamchatsky 3:12:38.0 0:45:30.0 84 М4 112 Vetoshkin Andrey 1962 P-Kamchatsky 3:12:48.0 0:45:40.0 85 М1 212 Koposov Dmitriy 1979 I Kotlas, Arkhangelsk region 3:13:09.0 0:46:01.0 86 М4 135 Burtsev Alexey 1963 МС St Petersburg 3:13:10.0 0:46:02.0 87 М1 119 Smirnov Alexander 1975 I P-Kamchatsky 3:13:12.0 0:46:04.0 88 М0 148 Lesik Stepan 1989 I P-Kamchatsky 3:13:23.0 0:46:15.0 89 М5 149 Derevtsov Alexander 1958 P-Kamchatsky 3:13:26.0 0:46:18.0 90 М1 160 Osechkin Maxim 1978 I Vilyuchinsk 3:13:29.0 0:46:21.0 91 М4 101 Kuleshov Leonid 1960 P-Kamchatsky 3:13:40.0 0:46:32.0 92 М6 183 Shirizdanov Oleg 1952 МС Komsomolsk 3:14:00.0 0:46:52.0 93 М7 224 Plehov Victor 1949 I Komsomolsk 3:14:23.0 0:47:15.0 94 М3 61 Granderg Oleg 1968 КМС P-Kamchatsky 3:15:00.0 0:47:52.0 95 М5 225 Bitehtin Peter 1955 I Solnechniy 3:15:03.0 0:47:55.0 96 М3 255 Rubahin Vladimir 1967 I P-Kamchatsky 3:15:30.0 0:48:22.0 97 М4 130 Knyazev Yuriy 1960 I Komsomolsk 3:15:51.0 0:48:43.0 98 М1 128 Grachyev Sergey 1978 I Electrostal 3:16:42.0 0:49:34.0 99 М2 123 Levschanov Sergey 1972 B-Ignatovo, Mordovia 3:16:52.0 0:49:44.0 100 М5 88 Yakimov Victor 1955 I Perm 3:17:05.0 0:49:57.0 101 М4 231 Dyrenkov Pavel 1961 I Yelizovo 3:17:23.0 0:50:15.0 102 М0 113 Grigoryev Sergey 1983 I Moscow 3:17:29.0 0:50:21.0 103 М1 145 Kuvshinov Yevgeniy 1979 Dubovoye settlement, Lipetsk recion 3:18:35.0 0:51:27.0 104 М3 132 Tsehovskiy Nikolay 1969 КМС Moscow 3:19:10.0 0:52:02.0 105 М2 85 Tambovskiy Andrey 1971 КМС P-Kamchatsky 3:19:26.0 0:52:18.0 106 М6 228 Golovenko Gennadiy 1952 I Amursk 3:19:53.0 0:52:45.0 107 М2 104 Kamenev Roman 1973 I Milkovo settlement 3:20:36.0 0:53:28.0 108 М5 237 Shkaberda Valentin 1955 P-Kamchatsky 3:20:55.0 0:53:47.0 109 М0 248 Kazuto Michael 1981 Noginsk, Moscow region 3:21:39.0 0:54:31.0 110 М0 83 Dzhugliy Maxim 1993 I Yelizovo 3:21:57.0 0:54:49.0 111 М0 221 Klykov Victor 1984 Milkovo settlement 3:21:58.0 0:54:50.0 112 М4 86 Chekanov Igor 1961 P-Kamchatsky 3:22:18.0 0:55:10.0 113 М6 116 Abakumov Victor 1950 КМС Moscow 3:22:29.0 0:55:21.0 114 М0 182 Sahibgareyev Ruslan 1981 Ufa 3:23:06.0 0:55:58.0 115 М0 155 Ivanov Peter 1982 P-Kamchatsky 3:23:17.0 0:56:09.0 116 М6 220 Chaykin Yevgeniy 1951 I Milkovo settlement 3:23:30.0 0:56:22.0 117 М2 213 Elenberg Vladimir 1974 I Komsomolsk 3:23:46.0 0:56:38.0 118 М1 125 Pikulin Denis 1975 P-Kamchatsky 3:24:08.0 0:57:00.0 119 М2 92 Morozov Sergey 1972 Zaprudnya settlement, Moscow region 3:24:10.0 0:57:02.0 120 М6 126 Sarapulov Ivan 1954 Pionerskiy settlement 3:24:28.0 0:57:20.0 121 М3 144 Akimov Igor 1965 I Milkovo settlement 3:24:44.0 0:57:36.0 122 М0 238 Bolotov Pavel 1982 P-Kamchatsky 3:25:00.0 0:57:52.0 123 М2 84 Lauritsen John 1972 Yefremov 3:25:02.0 0:57:54.0 124 М6 139 Pislegin Valeriy 1954 I Komsomolsk 3:25:04.0 0:57:56.0 125 М4 172 Golichenkov Vladimir 1961 I Moscow 3:25:22.0 0:58:14.0 126 М2 256 Buriy Vladimir 1971 P-Kamchatsky 3:25:35.0 0:58:27.0 127 М4 97 Kozhin Peter 1961 St Petersburg 3:25:45.0 0:58:37.0 128 М3 180 Kryukov Pavel 1969 Palana 3:26:24.0 0:59:16.0 129 М2 107 Karpichev Pavel 1970 КМС Mytischy 3:26:25.0 0:59:17.0 130 М4 109 Boriskin Yevgeniy 1961 I Milkovo settlement 3:27:07.0 0:59:59.0 131 М6 177 Krasilnikov Yakov 1952 I Milkovo settlement 3:27:07.0 0:59:59.0 132 М0 93 Belov Maxim 1985 I Zaprudnya settlement, Moscow region 3:27:36.0 1:00:28.0 133 М7 140 Tyuterev
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kamchatka Free
    FREE KAMCHATKA PDF Marcelo Figueras,Frank Wynne | 312 pages | 19 May 2011 | Grove Press / Atlantic Monthly Press | 9780802170873 | English | New York, United States Kamchatka Krai - Wikipedia It is geographically located in the Far East region of the country, and it is administratively part of the Far Eastern Kamchatka District. Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky is the largest city and capital of Kamchatka Krai, and home to over half of Kamchatka krai's population. The okrug Kamchatka the status of a special administrative division of the krai, Kamchatka the name of Koryak Okrug. The remainder is formed by a minor Kamchatka mainland Kamchatka, Karaginsky Island and the Commander Islands in the Bering Sea. It is bordered by Magadan Oblast to the west and Chukotka to the north. Kamchatka Krai is an active volcanic zone Kamchatka is home to Kluchevskayathe Kamchatka volcano in Eurasiaand the Decade Volcanoes of Avachinsky and Koryaksky. Kamchatka Krai occupies the territory of the Kamchatka Peninsulathe adjacent part of the mainland, the island Karaginsky and Commander Islands. Kamchatka belongs to the zone of volcanic activity, there are about large and medium-sized volcanoes, 29 of them are active. With the volcanic activity associated with the formation of many minerals, as well as a manifestation of hydro geo thermal activity: education fumaroles, geysers, hot Kamchatka, etc. Despite Kamchatka lying at similar latitudes to Scotlandit is mostly subarcticmore continental in the hinterland and more maritime and prone to monsoons on the coast. Most of the peninsula is covered with forests of stone birchwhile alder and cedar elfin are commonly found at higher altitudes.
    [Show full text]
  • Karaginsky Bay Salmon Fisheries Vostochny Bereg, Maksimovsky, Koryakmoreprodukt, Nachikinskoe & Severo Vostochnaya
    MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.1 April 2020 8950 Martin Luther King Jr. Street N. #202 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702-2211 Tel: (727) 563-9070 Fax: (727) 563-0207 Email: [email protected] President: Andrew A. Rosenberg, Ph.D. Karaginsky Bay Salmon Fisheries Vostochny Bereg, Maksimovsky, Koryakmoreprodukt, Nachikinskoe & Severo Vostochnaya Final Report and Determination 9 June 2020 Conformity Assessment Body (CAB) MRAG Americas Amanda Stern-Pirlot, Raymond Beamesderfer, Dmitry Assessment team Lajus Vostochny Bereg LLC, Maksimovsky LLC, Fishery client Koryakmoreproduct LLC, Nachikinskoe LLC, Severo- Vostochnaya LLC Assessment Type Initial Assessment MRAG Americas – US2667 Karaginsky CRG VBMaks and KMP salmon fisheries FRD 1 MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.1 April 2020 Document Control Record Document Draft Submitted By Date Reviewed By Date ACDR DL, RB 28 April 2019 ASP 29 April 2019 CDR/PRDR DL, RB, ASP 20 Sept 2019 ASP 25 Nov 2019 PCDR DL, RB, ASP 16 April 2020 ASP 17 April 2020 FRD DL, RB, ASP 1 June 2020 EW 3 June 2020 MRAG Americas – US2667 Karaginsky CRG VBMaks and KMP salmon fisheries FRD 2 MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.1 April 2020 1 Executive summary ........................................................................................6 2 Report details .................................................................................................7 2.1 Authorship and peer review details........................................................................ 7 2.2 Version details .........................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Species in Kamchatka: Distribution and Communities
    Botanica Pacifica. A journal of plant science and conservation. 2017. 6(1): 3–12 DOI: 10.17581/bp.2017.06101 Invasive species in Kamchatka: distribution and communities Larisa M. Abramova 1, Olga A. Chernyagina 2, Elizaveta A. Devyatova 3* Larisa M. Abramova 1 ABSTRACT e­mail: [email protected] This paper presents information about the distribution of invasive plant species Olga A. Chernyagina 2 in the Kamchatka Peninsula and the communities formed by these species in e­mail: [email protected] the urban areas. Some of these species are from the "black list" of invasive Elizaveta A. Devyatova 3* plants of Russia and some plants are usual for central Russia. These species were e­mail: [email protected] introduced to the Kamchatka Peninsula and actively spread over the urban area in recent years. We assign communities with the dominance of the species under study to 2 classes of vegetation: Galio-Urticetea and Molinio-Arrhenatheretea. The 1 Botanical Garden­Institute of the paper presents the prodromus of vegetation communities with the dominance of Ufa Scientific Centre of the Russian Aca­ the invasive species and a brief description of the syntaxa. The invasive species demy of Sciences, Ufa, 450080, Russia successfully invade synanthropic habitats, including the natural communities. It is 2 Kamchatka Branch of Pacific Institute necessary to observe their ecological status and find ways to prevent their further of Geography FEB RAS, Petropavlovsk­ spread in the Kamchatskii Krai. Kamchatskii, 683000, Russia Keywords: Kamchatka, synanthropic vegetation, alien plants, invasive species, invasion focal points 3 Vitus Bering Kamchatka State University, Petropavlovsk­ Kamchatskii, 683032, РЕЗЮМЕ Russia Абрамова Л.М., Чернягина О.А., Девятова Е.А.
    [Show full text]
  • ? Nnsipra Bulletin ?
    Ñ NNSIPRA BULLETIN Ñ Norwegian Network for the Support of the Indigenous Peoples of the Russian Arctic (NNSIPRA) Сеть Норвежских Организаций в Поддержку Коренных Народов Российского Севера No. 3, November 1999 - English Language Edition Secretariat: Norsk Polarinstitutt, Polarmiljøsenteret, N-9296 Tromsø E-mail: [email protected] Norwegian Polar Institute, Polar Environmental Centre, Phone: +47 - 77 75 05 00 N-9296 Tromsø, Norway Fax: +47 - 77 75 05 01 Coordinator / Editor: Winfried K. Dallmann, Tromsø Assistant Coordinator: Galina Diachkova (Дьячкова Галина), Moscow Assistant Editor: Helle V. Goldman, Tromsø NNSIPRA Bulletin is an information publication of the Norwegian Network for the Support of the Indigenous Peoples of the Russian Arctic. The Bulletin is issued twice a year. Additional issues are produced as new information warrants it. The Bulletin is edited in English and Russian and distributed to all registered network participants, as well as relevant state agencies and funding institutions. Distribution is free. All written contributions are appreciated. NNSIPRA is a communication network linking Russian Indigenous Peoples' Organisations (IPOs) with Norwegian and other international organisations alarmed about the future of the indigenous peoples of the Russian North. NNSIPRA's main goal is to spread information, to mediate contacts, to assist in project co-ordination and application for funding, and to ascertain through the IPOs that related Norwegian projects take sufficient care of indigenous peoples’ concerns. CONTENTS OF THIS EDITION: Letter from the Secretariat 3 The immense need for aid and support 3 Winfried K. Dallmann (Norwegian Polar Institute) and Tove S. Petersen (Arctic Council IPS) Arctic Leaders Summit III: 5 Circumpolar leaders reach out to Russian aboriginals 5 Jane George (reprint from Nunatsiaq News) Declaration of the Arctic Leaders Summit III 5 The Saami/Nordic programme "Capacity building for Russia's indigenous peoples …" 7 Lars Kullerud (UNEP/GRID-Arendal) International Public Fund for Support to Social and Economic Developm.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Opportunities in the Russian Far East
    1 INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST 1 2 INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST Chukotka Petrochemical industry AAutonomous Area Mining Power industry Kamchatka Territory Agriculture Republic of Sakha Fishery and aquaculture (Yakutia) Magadan Region Wood harvesting and processing Khabarovsk Territory Machine building Sakhalin Region Real estate and tourism Transport and logistics Amur Region Jewish Autonomous Region Primorsky Territory Healthcare 2 3 INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST Petrochemical Chukotka Petrochemical industry AAutonomous industry Area Mining Power industry Kamchatka Territory Agriculture Republic of Sakha Fishery and aquaculture (Yakutia) Magadan Projects underway Region Wood harvesting and NGL field Khabarovsk processing Territory Processing facility Machine building LNG plant Investment Opportunities Real estate and tourism Oil and gas field Sakhalin Region Transport and logistics Amur Processing facility Region Jewish Autonomous Region Primorsky LNG plant Territory Healthcare 3 4 INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST Sector Potential Petrochemical industry Attraction Factors State Support Mining Unique business environment ▪ Significant reserves (27% of gas and 17% of oil of the APR), estimated reserves – over USD 1.0 trillion. ▪ The Russian Far East offers unparalleled preferences to businesses – special legal treatment in the Advanced Special Economic Zones ▪ Industry majors are engaged in the sector (Gazprom, SIBUR, Power industry (ASEZ) and Free Port of Vladivostok
    [Show full text]
  • Demonstrating Sustainable Conservation of Biodiversity in Four Protected Areas of Russia’S Kamchatka Oblast - Phase 2 PIMS #3346
    Demonstrating Sustainable Conservation of Biodiversity in Four Protected Areas of Russia’s Kamchatka Oblast - Phase 2 PIMS #3346 UNDP RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON THE GEF FULL SIZE PROJECT BRIEF Response to comments from GEF Council USA - Comment 1: Micro credit: The project is for only 4 years. We are concerned that there is not enough time to develop the capacity for a viable micro credit institution given the long history of subsidies in the region. Is there an existing rural finance or micro credit institution in the area that will manage this component? Will there be a savings component to the project? How will it be sustained after the project closes? Small grants facility: Who will mange the facility? How will it be monitored and evaluated? What is the relationship between the facility and the micro-credit component? Response: Document reference: In the current design, the micro-credit and small grants facilities are two elements of a single SME Page50 Support Fund registered in the Bystrinsky District of the Kamchatka oblast. The Fund was designed and Page36; Page45 launched during the First Phase of the project and has been in operation for one and a half years now. Thus, by the beginning of the 2d phase the Fund has already accumulated certain experience, history and lessons from its operations in the Bystrinsky District. As noticed in the Evaluation report, by the end of the phase 1 the Fund managed to mobilize trust and ownership among the local communities and administration. Staring from 2005, the plan is to expand the activities of the Fund to other districts of the Kamchatka oblast adjacent to the project-supported protected areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Our Asacha Environmental Assessment
    TRANS-SIBERIAN GOLD PLC ASACHA GOLD PROJECT KAMCHATKA, RUSSIA Asacha Hill looking south along the main vein system ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Asacha Gold Project – Environmental Assessment Final Report ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ASACHA GOLD PROJECT KAMCHATKA, RUSSIA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MDS MINING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LTD November 2004 MDS Mining & Environmental Services November 2004 Asacha Gold Project – Environmental Assessment Final Report ___________________________________________________________________________________________ FOREWORD This Environmental Assessment for the Asacha Gold Project located in the Kamchatka Region of Eastern Russia was prepared by MDS Mining & Environmental Services (MDS) for: Trans-Siberian Gold plc Church Barn Old Farm Business Centre Church Road Toft Cambridge CB3 7RF United Kingdom All environmental and other factual information on the Asacha Gold Project used in the preparation of this document was provided by Trans-Siberian Gold in reports commissioned by them (and by others who have had an interest in the Asacha deposit) from a number of Russian and international consultants. The original sources of this information are referenced at the appropriate places in this document. The information has been accepted in good faith by MDS and has not been independently validated by MDS, who accepts no responsibility for any inaccuracies, errors or omissions in the information provided. Dr Mark Dodds-Smith Director MDS Mining & Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Water-Methane Geothermal Reservoirs in a South-West Foothills of Koryaksky Volcano, Kamchatka
    PROCEEDINGS, 46th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Stanford University, Stanford, California, February 15-17, 2021 SGP-TR-218 Water-Methane Geothermal Reservoirs in a South-West Foothills of Koryaksky Volcano, Kamchatka Alexey Kiryukhin1, Pavel Voronin1, Nikita Zhuravlev1, Galina Kopylova2 1 - Institute of Volcanology & Seismology FEB RAS, Piip 9, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, Russia, 683006, 2 - Kamchatka Branch of the Geophysical Survey of the Russian Academy of Sciences (KB GS RAS) [email protected] Keywords: Geothermal, Kamchatka, Magma, Fracking, Production, Faults, Reservoirs, Volcanoes ABSTRACT The Ketkinsky geothermal reservoirs appears to be the product of magma and water injection from the Koryaksky volcano. Actual thermal supply may be carried out by magma injections in the form of sills in the depth range of -6 to -3 km abs. from the SW sector of the Koryaksky volcano. Water supply according to the isotopic composition of water is mixed: it is carried out through the structure of the Koryaksky volcano from above 2 km abs. and at the expense magmatic fluids. The system of the identified productive faults and magma fracking system is geometrically conjugated through some of the existing faults. Well E1 located above of the magma- hydrothermal connection above mentioned demonstrates water level change sensitivity to magma fracking events of Koryaksky volcano 2008-2009. Thus, Ketkinsky geothermal field appears to be the product of magma and water injection from the Koryaksky volcano. 1. INTRODUCTION The Avachinsko-Koryaksky volcanogenic basin with an area of 2530 km2 includes 5 quaternary volcanoes (2 of which Avachinsky (2750 m abs) and Koryaksky (3456 m abs) are active), sub-basins of volcanogenic-sedimentary Neogene-Quaternary deposits up to 1.4 km thick (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Perspectives
    community.apan.org/wg/tradoc-g2/fmso/ Foreign Military Studies Office Volume 8 Issue #2 OEWATCH February 2018 FOREIGN NEWS & PERSPECTIVES OF THE OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT IRAN: FOREIGN PERSPECTIVES PERSPECTIVES ON IRAN LATIN AMERICA RUSSIA, UKRAINE 3 Iran: Revolutionary Guard Crowdsourcing Protestor 30 Big Colombian Election Coming 47 Russian General Staff’s Military Thought on “Color Revolutions” Identification 31 Venezuelan Rebel Killed and the Changing Nature of War 4 Iran: Was America Behind Uprising? 31 ELN Wants What the FARC Has 48 Multiple Drones Attack Russian Airbase in Syria 5 Iran: Lifting the Ban on Instagram was Illegal 32 The Dark Web Plagues Latin America and the Caribbean 50 Russia to Focus on Munitions, Instead of Platform 6 Iranian Authorities Block Internet Access to Citizens Amid 33 ISIS Recruitment Represents Growing Trend in Trinidad and Development Protests Tobago 51 Heavy MLRS Being Added to Russian Division and Brigades 7 Turkish Perspectives on Iran 34 Bitcoin as a Response to Hyperinflation in Venezuela? 53 Russian Ground Forces Divisions Upgrading Air Defense 8 The Sino-Iranian Relationship: Stronger than Ever 35 Why Panga Vessels Continue to Thrive in the Drug Capabilities 9 China Limits Internet Exposure to Iran Protests Trafficking World 55 New Naval System Will Be Capable of Launching Air, Shipping, 9 Indonesian Perspectives on the Iran Protests 36 Colombian Cartels and the Importance of Cocaine and Ground Attack Missiles 10 A Malaysian Perspective on US-Iran Relations Coordinators 57 Russia Increasing Military
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Plants in Flora of the Russian Far East: the Checklist and Comments Yulia K
    Russian Academy of Sciences, Far Eastern Branch Botanical Garden-Institute botanica pacifica A journal of plant science and conservation Volume 9, No. 1 2020 VLADIVOSTOK 2020 Botanica Pacifica. A journal of plant science and conservation. 2020. 9(1): 103–129 DOI: 10.17581/bp.2020.09107 Invasive plants in flora of the Russian Far East: the checklist and comments Yulia K. Vinogradova1, Elena V. Aistova2, Lyubov A. Antonova3, Olga A. Chernyagina4,5, Elena A. Chubar6, Galina F. Darman2, Eli za veta A. Devyatova4, Maria G. Khoreva7, Olga V. Kotenko2, Elena A. Marchuk8, Evgenii G. Nikolin9, Sergey V. Prokopenko10, Tamara A. Rubtsova11, Victor V. Sheiko12, Ekaterina P. Kudryavtseva13 & Pavel. V. Krestov8 Yulia K. Vinogradova1* e­mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Elena V. Aistova2 The paper presents a checklist of the species invading the natural phytocenoses 3 of the Far Eastern Federal District of Russia (FEFD) that includes 40.6 % of the Lyubov A. Antonova state territory. It summarizes original data on distribution, habitats and inva sive­ Olga A. Chernyagina4,5 ness status (IS) of 116 alien species belonging to 99 genera of 32 families. Eigh­ Elena A. Chubar6 teen species are only beginning to invade natural cenoses and have IS 3; 76 species Galina F. Darman2 intensively invade natural cenoses and are listed in the group with IS 2. Trans­ 4 former are represented by 22 species with IS 1, of which Ambrosia arte misiifolia, Elizaveta A. Devyatova Bidens frondosa, Solidago canadensis, Impatiens glandulifera and Hordeum juba tum are most Maria G. Khoreva7 widely distributed. A very strong heterogeneity of the soil and cli mate conditions Olga V.
    [Show full text]
  • West Kamchatka Salmon Fishery Ozernovsky RKZ No 55
    8950 Martin Luther King Jr. Street N. #202 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702-2211 Tel: (727) 563-9070 Fax: (727) 563-0207 Email: [email protected] West Kamchatka Salmon Fishery Ozernovsky RKZ No 55 Public Comment Draft Report 28 April 2020 Conformity Assessment Body (CAB) MRAG Americas, Inc. Assessment team Raymond Beamesderfer, Amanda Stern-Pirlot, Dmitry Lajus JSC Ozernovsky Fish Canning Plant #55, RK Zapadny LLC, Fishery client Rybkholkam LLC, Poseidon Ltd Assessment Type Initial Assessment MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.1 April 2020 Document Control Record Document Draft Submitted By Date Reviewed By Date ACDR RB, DL Sept 1 2019 ASP Sept 6 2019 CDR/PRDR RB, DL, ASP 31 Jan 2020 ASP 24 Feb 2020 PCDR RB, DL, ASP 25 April 2020 ASP 27 April 2020 MRAG Americas—West Kamchatka Ozernovsky RKZ No. 55 Public Comment Draft Report 2 MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.1 April 2020 Contents 1 Executive summary .............................................................................................. 5 2 Report details ....................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Authorship and peer review details ................................................................................... 5 2.2 Version details ...................................................................................................... 8 3 Unit(s) of Assessment and Certification, and Results Overview ........................... 9 3.1 Unit(s) of Assessment and Unit(s) of Certification ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER FOUR What Is Siberia to Russia?
    Durham E-Theses Russia's Great Power Ambitions: The Role of Siberia, the Russian Far East, and the Arctic in Russia's Contemporary Relations with Northeast Asia CONTRERAS-LUNA, RAFAEL How to cite: CONTRERAS-LUNA, RAFAEL (2016) Russia's Great Power Ambitions: The Role of Siberia, the Russian Far East, and the Arctic in Russia's Contemporary Relations with Northeast Asia, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/12034/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 RUSSIA’S GREAT POWER AMBITIONS: THE ROLE OF SIBERIA, THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST, AND THE ARCTIC IN RUSSIA’S CONTEMPORARY RELATIONS WITH NORTHEAST ASIA ________________________________________________________________________ Rafael Contreras Luna Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Government and International Affairs Durham University 2016 i ABSTRACT Being at the confluence of two worlds – East and West – has had long-term influence on how Russia has thought of its national identity, in particular prompting the question: to what extent is it joining or resisting these two worlds? This thesis argues that Russia’s self- perception of being a great power – greatpowerness - defines its status and position in the world.
    [Show full text]