DOCSLIB.ORG

Central Sandhills Community Wildfire Protection Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Central Sandhills Community Wildfire Protection Plan Central Sandhills Community Wildfire Protection Plan FOR THE COUNTIES OF B LAINE, CUSTER, GARFIELD, GREELEY, LOGAN, LOUP, THOMAS, VALLEY, WHEELER, AND PART OF LINCOLN Photo courtesy of Julie Bain, USFS JUNE, 2019 Central Sandhills Community Wildfire Protection Plan ii Central Sandhills Community Wildfire Protection Plan June, 2019 Central Sandhills Community Wildfire Protection Plan FACILITATED BY THE Nebraska Forest Service IN COLLABORATION AND COOPERATION WITH B LAINE, CUSTER, GARFIELD, GREELEY, LINCOLN, LOUP, THOMAS, VALLEY, AND WHEELER COUNTIES LOCAL VOLUNTEER FIRE DISTRICTS REGIONS 2 6 AND 51 AND CUSTER COUNTY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT CENTRAL SANDHILLS CWPP STEERING COMMITTEE LOCAL MUNICIPAL OFFICIALS LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCIES AREA LANDOWNERS Prepared by Sandy Benson, Forest Fuels Management Specialist Nebraska Forest Service Phone 402-684-2290 • [email protected] http://nfs.unl.edu Special thanks to: Joseph Stansberry Kyle Martens Ben Bohall Julie Bain Alma Beland Mark Rempe Photo courtesy of Julie Bain, USFS It is the policy of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln not to discriminate based upon age, race, ethnicity, color, national origin, gender, sex, pregnancy, disability, sexual orientation, genetic information, veteran’s status, marital status, religion or political affiliation. Central Sandhills Community Wildfire Protection Plan June, 2019 iii Central Sandhills Community Wildfire Protection Plan (This page intentionally blank) iv Central Sandhills Community Wildfire Protection Plan June, 2019 Central Sandhills Community Wildfire Protection Plan Approved By: Blaine County Board of Commissioners Signature: ______________________________ Title: ____________________________ Name __________________________________ Date: ____________________________ Custer County Board of Supervisors Signature: ______________________________ Title: ____________________________ Name __________________________________ Date: ____________________________ Garfield County Board of Commissioners Signature: ______________________________ Title: ____________________________ Name __________________________________ Date: ____________________________ Greeley County Board of Commissioners Signature: ______________________________ Title: ____________________________ Name __________________________________ Date: ____________________________ Lincoln County Board of Commissioners Signature: ______________________________ Title: ____________________________ Name __________________________________ Date: ____________________________ Logan County Board of Commissioners Signature: ______________________________ Title: ____________________________ Name __________________________________ Date: ____________________________ Loup County Board of Commissioners Signature: ______________________________ Title: ____________________________ Name __________________________________ Date: ____________________________ Central Sandhills Community Wildfire Protection Plan June, 2019 v Central Sandhills Community Wildfire Protection Plan Thomas County Board of Commissioners Signature: ______________________________ Title: ____________________________ Name __________________________________ Date: ____________________________ Valley County Board of Supervisors Signature: ______________________________ Title: ____________________________ Name __________________________________ Date: ____________________________ Wheeler County Board of Commissioners Signature: ______________________________ Title: ____________________________ Name __________________________________ Date: ____________________________ Nebraska Forest Service Signature: ______________________________ Title: ____________________________ Name __________________________________ Date: ____________________________ vi Central Sandhills Community Wildfire Protection Plan June, 2019 Central Sandhills Community Wildfire Protection Plan Table of Contents Overview Map ............................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................... iii Signature Pages ............................................................................................................................................. v Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................................... vii List of Acronyms .......................................................................................................................................... viii Introduction and Legislative Background ..................................................................................................... 1 Goals and Objectives ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Priority Landscapes ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Process ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Overview ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Wildfire Hazard: History and Impacts ......................................................................................................... 10 Emergency Operations ................................................................................................................................ 13 Community Specific Considerations Blaine County ................................................................................................................................. 16 Custer County ................................................................................................................................ 18 Garfield County .............................................................................................................................. 20 Greeley County .............................................................................................................................. 22 Lincoln County ............................................................................................................................... 24 Logan County ................................................................................................................................. 26 Loup County ................................................................................................................................... 28 Thomas County .............................................................................................................................. 30 Valley County ................................................................................................................................. 32 Wheeler County ............................................................................................................................. 34 Action Plan .................................................................................................................................................. 36 Wildfire Risk Assessment ............................................................................................................... 36 Wildfire Risk Reduction .................................................................................................................. 37 Recommendations for Increasing Emergency Preparedness ........................................................ 38 Training and Education .................................................................................................................. 40 Fuels Mitigation Strategies ............................................................................................................ 40 Five-Year Action Plan ..................................................................................................................... 42 Maintenance .................................................................................................................................. 42 Monitoring and Evaluation ............................................................................................................ 43 Endnotes ..................................................................................................................................................... 44 List of Appendices ....................................................................................................................................... 46 Central Sandhills Community Wildfire Protection Plan June, 2019 vii Central Sandhills Community Wildfire Protection Plan Central Sandhills Community Wildfire Protection Plan Acronyms Acronym Meaning BLM Bureau of Land Management BUL Biologically Unique Landscape cfs cubic feet per second CWPP; CSCWPP Community Wildfire Protection Plan; Central Sandhills Community Wildfire Protection Plan EMA Emergency Management Area/Agency EMS Emergency Medical Service FAP Forest Action Plan FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FEPP Federal Excess Property Program FFA Future Farmers of America FFP Firefighter Property GIS Geographic Information System GPS Global Positioning System HAZMAT
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (General Insurance
    8, 1909. 8 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN FRIDAY, JANUARY and the defects of NORTHWEST BRIEFS. achievements Scandinavian American Bank. the Brother in Black. In a few A resolution was introduced at Write Today straight-forward, clean-cut re- a copy meeting the city for of the recent of marks, free from partiality or "THE BANK ACCOUNT" council asking Mayor John E. prejudice, he pointed out to his a new, neat little 8-page paper aa full Philadelphia, of good things as an egg is of meat. Reyburn of to send auditors the shortcomings of the MAILED FREE. the Liberty Bell to the Alaska- Negro and deplored the fact there The Scandinavian-American Bank, Yukon-Pacific Exposition. was such a general impulse with Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. d'Oreille River Navi- them to rush to the already over- The Pend E. N. BROOKS & CO. gation Co. has just inaugurated crowded cities where the cost of For Frills For Men. the best river service which the living is the highest and competi- HXQK traveling 1 public has ever enjoyed tion the" greatest. With Booker CLASS HABEBDASEEBT on that river. T. Washington, Mayor Miller 1331 Second Aye., Seattle, Wash. agreed life of the agri- The teachers' institute held in that the culturist is the most independent Spokane is being well attended. • Albert Hansen. existence in the world. He men- Eyes Carefully Examined and Two-thirds of the Columbia riv- tioned the fact that along many Properly Fitted With Glasses er bridge is completed and about lines the Negro had already at- 706 First Avenue.
    [Show full text]
  • Cedar River State Water Trail
    A WATER TRAIL GUIDE TO THE CEDAR RIVER Iron Horse Prairie BLOOMING S.N.A. 2 2 24 PRAIRIE 16 20 STEELE CO. DODGE CO. 15 9 FREEBORN CO. MOWER CO. 56 34 218 Cr eek 36 30 WALTHAM 1 1 NEWRY 20 Mud 16 25 1 SARGEANT 105 Creek CEDAR 34 103 57 Deer 218 RIVER MAPLE ISLAND CORNING MAYVILLE 251 Roberts HOLLANDALE 36 25 Cr eek LANSING 20 CORNERS 2 25 2 34 LANSING BROWNSDALE 2 RENOVA 16 30 Hickory Lake 61 Wild Indigo Prairie S.N.A. 36 Ramsey Mill 19 Pond W.M.A. 104 ANDYVILLE 25 Wild Indigo Prairie S.N.A. Carex Ramsey Mill Pond Cr eek W.M.A. Murphy RAMSEY 16 25 218 Creek Moscow Creek Wolf Ramsey Mill Pond 25 Portage (R) 125 Yds Turtle 27 20 J.C. Hormel 56 Nature Center Dobbins 102 Creek 61 34 Austin Mill Pond NICOLVILLE 102 East 90 OAKLAND Schrafel 90 W.M.A. Side 90 HOLLANDALE Lake Mentel 46 46 AUSTIN JUNCTION Portage (L) 250 Yds W.M.A. 218 19 Roosevelt Bridge Creek 90 Driesner Park 15 3 3 30 Orchard 105 Cedar River A.M.A. Rose 28 28 river level development) trail (future gauge Creek Route Description for the Cedar River RIVER NOTE: (R) and (L) represent right and left banks of the river when facing downstream. Cedar River Riverwood Landing A.M.A. 25.0 County Road 2 bridge ROSE River VARCO 4 24-21.6 Ramsey Mill Pond W.M.A. 4 218 CREEK Lyle-Austin W.M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Sockeye Salmon in Lake Washington
    Cedar River Sockeye Past and Present • History of the Watershed and Re-Configuration of the Basin • Baker Lake Sockeye Introductions • Lake Washington Water Quality Clean-Up • Sockeye Adult Returns • Current Limiting Factors for Juvenile and Adult Sockeye • Expectations for Future Returns (WDFW Model) ~17,000 Years Ago Vashon Glaciation Period Puget Lobe of the Cordilleran Ice Sheet Waterlines is a project of the Burke Museum. Please visit us to learn more about Seattle’s past landscapes. www.burkemuseum.org/waterlines Captain Burrows Pleasure Resort, 1906 Captain Burrows resort at the mouth of the Black River from 1897 to 1917 [Renton Historical Society note]. Sign in image: Captain Burrows. Summer-Winter Pleasure Resort. Good Fishing-Hunting-Boating . Renton Historical Society collection, UW (648A) • “The only fish in them is a species of trout, very few in number, the largest of which are about a foot in length.” • Hammond 1886, in reference to Lakes Washington and Sammamish. • "A small salmon was said to live permanently in Lake Washington spawning in the creeks which emptied into the lake. The Duwamish of that section were said to prefer this salmon to that which entered the rivers from the Sound.” • Smith (1940), reporting on cultural interviews with local tribal elders. City of Renton created a new waterway in 1912 that diverted the lower Cedar River from the Black River into Lake Washington. (Buerge 1985) The purpose of this 2,000 foot channel was to abate flooding and to provide a “Commercial Waterway” for sea-going vessels after the completion of the ship locks at Ballard.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Impacts on Water Management in the Puget Sound Region, Washington, USA Julie A
    Climate Change Impacts on Water Management in the Puget Sound Region, Washington, USA Julie A. Vano1, Nathalie Voisin1, Lan Cuo1,2, Alan F. Hamlet1,2, Marketa McGuire Elsner2, Richard N. Palmer3, Austin Polebitski1, and Dennis P. Lettenmaier1,2 Abstract limate change is projected to result, on average, in earlier snowmelt and reduced summer flows, patterns that are not well represented in the historical observations used for planning and reliability analyses by water utilities. CWe extend ongoing efforts in the Puget Sound basin cities of Everett, Seattle, and Tacoma to characterize differences between historic and future streamflow and the ability of the region’s water supply systems to meet future demands. We use future streamflow simulations for the 2020s, 2040s, and 2080s from the Distributed Hydrology-Soil- Vegetation Model (DHSVM), driven by climate simulations archived by the 2007 Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). We use ensembles of streamflow predictions produced by DHSVM forced with multiple downscaled ensembles from the IPCC climate models as inputs to reservoir system models for the Everett, Seattle, and Tacoma water supply systems. Over the next century, under average conditions all three systems are projected to experience a decline and eventual disappearance of the springtime snowmelt peak in their inflows. How these shifts impact water management depends on the specifics of the reservoir system and their operating objectives, site-specific variations in the influence that reductions in snowmelt have on reservoir inflows, and the adaptive capacity of each system. Without adaptations, average seasonal drawdown of reservoir storage is projected to increase in all of the systems throughout the 21st century.
    [Show full text]
  • Thousands of Products from a Single Source
    Abrasives Appliances & Fireplaces Bathroom Accessories Cabinets & Counter Tops Cutting Tools Fasteners Hand Tools Heating & Cooling Hose & Fittings Janitorial Supplies Material Handling Equipment Municipal Materials Pipe, Valves, Fittings, and Tubing Plumbing Supplies Thousands of Products Power Tools & Machinery from a Single Source... Protective Clothing & Safety Precision Measuring Tools Pumps & Compressors Residential Water Systems Shop Supplies Tool & Die and Mold Supplies www.trumbull.com Capabilities and Programs that add Value! Experience Since 1922, Trumbull Industries has provided the products you need when you need them. Trumbull has OVER 300 DEDICATED EMPLOYEES who are eager to provide prompt & friendly assistance. Quality We offer the BEST NAME BRANDS available and QUALITY SERVICE. If you need a supplier that you can count on for timely, accurate delivery, contact us! Inventory Trumbull Industries has over 100,000 PRODUCTS in stock both at the Master Distribution Center in Warren, Ohio and at your local Trumbull branch warehouse. Blanket Order Program Trumbull can maintain LOCAL INVENTORY of “special items” utilizing our blanket order program. If you need products that are factory specials or are difficult to purchase, let Trumbull help you develop a stocking program. Special Services Trumbull provides SPECIAL SERVICES for many customers. Quality inspections and documentation, certifications, custom invoicing are a few examples. Let Trumbull help design a program for you! Supply Chain Management Trumbull can help you develop
    [Show full text]
  • Dozen American Warships on Scene
    THE WASHINGTON HERALD, SUNIjAY, AUGUST 2. 1914. ' SUNDAY OUTINGS COPP DESCRIBES Diplomatic ,, Tempest Raves in , Haiti ((omnnr n mini AR011CAPITAL MONROE DOCTRINE TREMBLES IN THE BALANCE OUIlilUL liLHm OOXTINDKD FBOU FiGE EIGHT. Former Chief Probation Off- Du-po- nt Dozen Warships ahead on Connecticut avenue pa tiling American On Scene icer of Capital Now Has Circle and Farrago! Square to 1S.7 Pennsylvania avenue opposite Unique Institution. White House. iHiBiBCjiBiBiBiBiBiBiBiBiBiBUliBiBiBiBiBiBiBiBiBiBKj Q 3 Bntt?A.WjSSaSaaBgBBMiBBiBMiBMiBiBaBiBSSBtTjI sHlllllllllllllllllllllllll La Plata and Chapel Polat. fSt 'iiiSi"'-- Thirty-tw- o miles of Maryland State HAS CURE FOR DESPAIR highway connect Washington with La Plata and the remainder of the distance of tank-ridin- g were seen, Washington to Chapel la over good dirt road. MOTORCYCLE NOTES. e Point riders-ar- showing a disposition to equip Philadelphia Pastor Tells of Hii Meth- The trip Is a favorite one for many biggest and Mary- What nromlses to be the their machines aa required by the new who enjoy a trip Into Southern most successful event of its kind ever regulations. ods in Leading Despondent land and the prospect of a good meal at traffic conducted by the National Capital Motor- Back to Hope. the end of the Journey. cycle Club began at 2 o'clock yesterday This section of Maryland was one of afternoon, whan T. O. Wansleben cneca-- STUDEBAKER PUBLICITY the earliest settled portions of the United ed out from the Tenth street dubrooma By EARLR F. DORSET. States. Later this part of the State came and started on the run to Into notice at the time Booth shot Lin- Rock Point Md.
    [Show full text]
  • Moose River Plains Wild Forest - South Anc D Little Moose Wilderness Owns
    l r T s e d a Protect Yourself c s ^ ok Hiking trails can be rough and rugged a Bro • Moose River Plains Wild Forest - South anC d Little Moose Wilderness owns ! Br - they are not maintained as park Eighth Lake id E [J!j Sagamore c d walkways - wear boots or shoes See North Map Campground la a ! Lake P o e R designed for hiking. [J!(!G k Indian !9 ! " a ! !j L Lake ] - • Know the weather forecast; plan and e Sag k l am roo l Sugarloaf Fourth o [J!( st B i re Lo v Mtn prepare based on current and [J h Lake !0 R t d r forecasted conditions. !G o !S p N o B L U E R I D G E r • Pack a day pack with items like water, o e Inlet Sixth !0 L W I L D E R N E S S v [J i Lake e ! flashlight, extra clothing, etc. k ra R !0 e a Ko Lak ke Seveth L La • Sign in and out of all trail registers th Mohegan l h n i nth- t Wakely d eve ig Lake M ! that you encounter. a R S ly j! !( r E Pond ?g ke Wak r [J T a ely M Trl a W tn d Respect Others n e t M O O S E R I V E R !A iln k C k M o • Be courteous of all other users e P L A I N S W I L D ro ! im B (10) j! !(!G L F O R E S T ey [J regardless of their sport, speed or e dl ak ra Limekiln L ake L B Cellar Pd t[ skill level.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Washington the Cedar River Watershed Is One of Two
    INTERNAL REPORT 102 FOREST PLANTCOMMUNITIESOF THELOWER CEDARRIVER WATERSHED D.R. M. Scott and J. Long University of Washington INTRODUCTION The Cedar River Watershed is one of two principal sites for the Western Coniferous Biome of the International Biological Program (IBP). Various physical add biological components of the watershed are being intensively studied as part of the Analysis of Ecosystems objectives of IBP. The purpose of this report is to present the results of an initial recon- naissance-level study of the forest vegetation of the watershed. The . tentative delineations and descriptions of this vegetation may be useful in the stratification of the watershed for intensive ecological research. A proposal for an inventory of terrestrial ecosystems of the Cedar River drainage by Scott and Del Moral (1971) was not funded for 1972. However, a half-time graduate student salary for six months and some transporta- tion were made available. This limited funding made possible the initiation of a survey of the forest communities of the watershed. The emphasis during this first field season was placed on the vegetation of the lower watershed. This decision was based on several factors, including the uncertainty of, transportation to the upper watershed and the fact that some study of the upper watershed, specifically the Findley Lake Basin, had already been completed (Del Moral, unpublished). DESCRIPTION OF THE LOWER WATERSHED The lower watershed can be defined, for the purposes of this report, as that part of the Cedar River Watershed below 600 m in elevation. On this basis it represents approximately 14,000 ha or 40% of the total watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • LOT TITLE 1Z RARE 1930'S Indian 4 Cylinder Motorcycle 2Z RARE 1929
    A B 1 LOT TITLE 2 1Z RARE 1930's Indian 4 cylinder Motorcycle 3 2Z RARE 1929 Indian V-Twin Motorcycle 4 3Z RARE 1920's Indian Motorcycle Project 5 4Z RARE Early Excelsior Motorcycle Frame 6 5Z Allstate Scooter Project 7 6Z Vintage Harley Davidson Motorcycle Frame 8 7Z RARE Early Harley Davidson Motorcycle Frame 9 8Z Vintage Wards Motorcycle Project 10 9Z Vintage Harley Davidson Hummer Motorcycle 11 10Z Vespa Aquila Piaggio GA Project 12 11Z 1953 Zundapp Motorcycle 13 12Z Benelli Motorcycle Project 14 13Z Honda Dream Project or Parts 15 14Z Vintage Harley Davidson Motorcycle Side Car 16 15Z RARE Indian Motorcycle Side Car 17 16Z RARE Harley Davidson Motorcycle Side Car 18 17Z RARE 1911 Wagner Motorcycle Frame and Motor 19 18Z 1950's Sears Pugh Chez Motorcycle 20 19Z Vintage Indian Motorcycle Frame Project 21 20Z Vintage Servicycle Motorcycle Project 22 23Z RARE Pierce Motorcycle Upright Single Cylinder Motor 23 24Z RARE Wagner Motorcycle Project Motor 24 26Z Early Indian Motorcycle Transmission 25 27Z Early Harley Davidson Springer Front Motorcycle Forks 26 28Z Early Harley Davidson Springer Front Motorcycle Forks 27 29Z RARE Thor Motorcycle Upright Single Cylinder Motor 28 30Z Rare Henderson Motorcycle Cutaway 4 cylinder motor 29 31Z Early Indian Motorcycle Tank 30 32Z Early Harley Davidson Motorcycle Tank 31 33Z Early Indian Motorcycle Tank 32 34Z Early Indian Motorcycle Tank 33 35Z Early Harley Davidson Motorcycle Tank 34 36Z A B 35 37Z Vintage Motorcycle Tank 36 38Z Vintage Motorcycle Tank 37 39Z Vintage Smith Moto Wheel 38 40Z RARE
    [Show full text]
  • Ashland Post Fire Landscape Assessment 2014 2
    Ashland Post Fire Landscape United States Assessment Forest Depart ment of Service Agriculture Ashland Ranger District Custer National Forest Powder River and Rosebud Counties, MT May 2014 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Ashland Post Fire Landscape Assessment 2014 2 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 Ashland Ecological and Social/Economic Niche .............................................................................. 11 1.1.1 Livestock Grazing ...................................................................................................................... 11 1.1.2 Mixed Prairie and Forest ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Otoe County Appendix
    Table of Contents Otoe County ................................................................................. 3 Village of Burr ............................................................................ 24 Village of Douglas ..................................................................... 35 Village of Dunbar ....................................................................... 47 Village of Lorton ........................................................................ 59 City of Nebraska City ................................................................ 70 Village of Otoe ........................................................................... 87 Village of Palmyra ................................................................... 100 City of Syracuse ...................................................................... 112 Village of Talmage ................................................................... 127 Village of Unadilla ................................................................... 140 Nebraska City Public Schools ............................................... 152 Palmyra District OR-1 ............................................................. 163 Palmyra Rural Fire District ..................................................... 172 Syracuse Volunteer Fire Department .................................... 179 Talmage Rural Fire Department ............................................. 186 Unadilla Volunteer Fire and Rescue ...................................... 193 Nemaha NRD Multi-Jurisdictional
    [Show full text]
  • International Corporate Investment in Ohio Operations June 2020
    Research Office A State Affiliate of the U.S. Census Bureau International Corporate Investment in Ohio Operations 20 September 2007 June 20 June 2020 Table of Contents Introduction and Explanations Section 1: Maps Section 2: Alphabetical Listing by Company Name Section 3: Companies Listed by Country of Ultimate Parent Section 4: Companies Listed by County Location International Corporate Investment in Ohio Operations June 2020 THE DIRECTORY OF INTERNATIONAL CORPORATE INVESTMENT IN OHIO OPERATIONS is a listing of international enterprises that have an investment or managerial interest within the State of Ohio. The report contains graphical summaries of international firms in Ohio and alphabetical company listings sorted into three categories: company name, country of ultimate parent, and county location. The enterprises listed in this directory have 5 or more employees at individual locations. This directory was created based on information obtained from Dun & Bradstreet. This information was crosschecked against company Websites and online corporate directories such as ReferenceUSA®. There is no mandatory state filing of international status. When using this directory, it is important to recognize that global trade and commerce are dynamic and in constant flux. The ownership and location of the companies listed is subject to change. Employment counts may differ from totals published by other sources due to aggregation, definition, and time periods. Research Office Ohio Development Services Agency P.O. Box 1001, Columbus, Ohio 43266-1001 Telephone: (614) 466-2116 http://development.ohio.gov/reports/reports_research.htm International Investment in Ohio - This survey identifies 4,303 international establishments employing 269,488 people. - Companies from 50 countries were identified as having investments in Ohio.
    [Show full text]