DOCSLIB.ORG

View Geotechnical Engineering. Syllabus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
View Geotechnical Engineering. Syllabus Course Descriptor CE 357 – Geotechnical Engineering Page 1 Department of CAEE Spring Semester 2021 The University of Texas at Austin Unique Nos. 16095, 16100, 16105, 16110, 16115, 16120, 16125, 16130, 16135, 16140, 16145, 16150, 16155, 16160 CE 357 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING Class Lectures: Laboratory: Days: M, W, F Varies with lab section Time: 11:00 a.m. – 12:00 noon Or Ernest Cockrell, Jr., Hall 3:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. ECJ B.140 Instructor: Lab TAs: TBA (varies with section) Dr. Jorge G. Zornberg Office: ECJ 9.227G E-mail: [email protected] Office hours: M, W 1:00 p.m. – 2:00 p.m. Course Objectives and Academic/Learning Goals The overall objectives of this course are to expose civil, architectural, and environmental engineering undergraduate students to the terminology, important principles, and basic methods of analysis used in geotechnical engineering. Geotechnical engineering focuses on how soil and rock support and affect the performance of structures built on or below the earth's surface. Accordingly, this course introduces the student to the basic principles that govern the behavior of soils, and geotechnical engineering works. The central concepts to be covered in this class are: (1.) Index properties and classification of soils; (2.) Soil hydraulic conductivity and pore water movement; (3.) Soil compressibility, consolidation, and settlements; (4.) Shear strength of soil; (5.) Geosynthetic types and functions; (6.) Stresses in soil and the effective stress concept; and (7.) Engineering soil properties and their measurement. An understanding of these basic concepts is essential in the design of foundations for structures, retaining walls, tunnels, excavations, earth fills, dams, pavements, stable earth slopes, sanitary landfills, and environmental remediation projects. By the end of this course, the student should be able to: (1.) Classify the different types of geotechnical materials. (2.) Become familiar with the tests needed to describe and predict the behavior of a soil, permitting the student to work effectively with specialists in geotechnical engineering. (3.) Apply basic hydraulic flow principles to interpret the behavior of geotechnical components in hydraulic systems (e.g. earth dams). (4.) Explain the response in effective stresses to a change in total stresses. 1 Course Descriptor CE 357 – Geotechnical Engineering Page 2 (5.) Apply the theory of consolidation to estimate time-dependent settlements. Select and justify the selection of solutions to settlement-related problems. (6.) Acquire the background knowledge needed to complete more advanced courses in geotechnical engineering (CE 360K - Foundation Engineering, CE 375 - Earth Slopes and Retaining Structures, as well as courses at the graduate level). (7.) Improve professional engineering skills, including the presentation of technical data and written communications. Course Delivery This is a hybrid course, which means that some of the course content is delivered in person and some online. As the course progresses, the course TAs and I will coordinate any in-person components of the course. However, we will conduct the in-person components in a way that those of you that are taking the course entirely online can also gain access to the content. My initial plan for the course is reflected in the course syllabus. However, I may change the mix of in-person and online, in either direction, in response to changing health conditions. I understand how challenging this is and I will do my best to keep things as planned. Synchronous and Asynchronous Course Components The course will make extensive use of the Modules features in Canvas Learning Management System (LMS) to facilitate the organization of course components. These components are briefly discussed below to highlight their sequencing in each course module. Additional information is provided subsequently in this syllabus regarding these components. The module components are color-coded and/or capitalized to facilitate following their sequence. Specifically, the different module components will be conducted as follows: • ASYNCHRONOUS COMPONENTS BEFORE SYNCHRONOUS MEETINGS: They include pre-recorded videos, which should be watched ahead of the synchronous meeting. You should plan your schedule accordingly, as the lecture/lab will be conducting assuming that everyone has successfully completed the items required before the meeting. All pre- meeting/lab components are DUE by the time of the synchronous meeting (i.e. lecture meetings or labs). • SYNCHRONOUS COMPONENTS: During which the class will meet in person or via Zoom and will start at the regular schedule of the class (Monday and Wednesdays at 1:00 pm for the lectures), Fridays at 1:00 pm for the labs). They may finish before 3:00pm depending on the volume of information that has been delivered asynchronously. • ASYNCHRONOUS COMPONENTS AFTER SYNCHRONOUS MEETINGS: They will provide additional opportunities to learn the course material. They also include the assessment components of the course. Because of the online nature of the course components, the number of assessment components will be more frequent, yet with lower stakes than in the case of typical (non-online) courses. The due date of the post-meeting components will be explicitly indicated. The pre-meeting components of the modules may include: • GATHER SLIDE PRINTOUTS: This involves obtaining the printouts of the relevant PowerPoint slides to be used during the videos and the synchronous components of the course. You will need to write on these printouts during the lectures and laboratories. • PRE-RECORDED LECTURE/LABORATORY VIDEOS: They involve prerecorded lectures/labs that should be watched BEFORE the synchronous lecture/laboratory session begins. They correspond to the asynchronous portion of this course. They will present relevant topics to toe course and will include quizzes to facilitate your understanding of the material. 2 Course Descriptor CE 357 – Geotechnical Engineering Page 3 • QUIZZES: They will be used to assess your knowledge during the asynchronous or synchronous lectures/laboratories. They will be graded unless noted otherwise. The meeting components of the modules may include: • SYNCHRONOUS MEETINGS: The class will meet in person or via Zoom to discuss the material presented in pre-class videos or to cover new topics for the class • SYNCHRONOUS LABORATORIES: They class will also meet in person or via Zoom to cover the laboratory material. While you will not be conducted your own lab experiments, our TAs will have generated experimental data that will allow you to prepare reports and evaluations of such data. The post-meeting components of the modules may include: • HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENTS: They will provide additional opportunities to learn important components of the course material. Unlike the quizzes and exams, collaboration with your classmates is allowed (and even encouraged) to complete these assignments. Their submissions are individual, though. • LAB REPORTS: They involve compilation of the experimental data generated in preparation of the laboratories. • EXAMS: They will be used to assess your holistic understanding of the course material. • READING MATERIAL: Including material covered in class, as well as complementary background and relevant information. They will be useful as material to read after the lectures. Information Technology Considering the online nature of the course components, the technology used to mediate such components has been carefully organized. You will need access to a laptop or desktop computer (modern and updated operating system) and a reliable internet connection. You will also need to have available during the lectures a version of the course packet in which you can write (printed or using a second iPad/tablet where you can write). The following information technology platforms will be used in this course: • ZOOM: Videotelephony and online services to be used for delivery of the synchronous components of the course. • CANVAS: Learning Management System (LMS) used to facilitate the organization of course components. The Modules in Canvas will be used to organize the learning components of the course • PANOPTO: Main video platform to be used to deliver the asynchronous components of this course. They will be complemented with other video sources. • GRADESCOPE: Platform to be used to compile and deliver exams in the course • PIAZZA: Discussion platform adopted in this course for communication among students, TAs and Instructor. • QUIZZES: They will be compiled using both CANVAS and PANOPTO. Will be used to assess understanding of asynchronous components of the course. Course Prerequisites • Civil Engineering 319F - Elementary Mechanics of Fluids Course Textbooks 1. Class Textbook: Das, B.M. and Sobhan, K.: Principles of Geotechnical Engineering – Ninth Edition. Thomson Engineering, 2017; ISBN-10: 1305970934. 3 Course Descriptor CE 357 – Geotechnical Engineering Page 4 2. Course Notes: Zornberg, Jorge G., CE 357: Geotechnical Engineering Class Handouts - Available on-line in Canvas in the Module for each lecture. The notes include supporting materials for the course lectures. Please have them available for the pre-recorded lectures and for the synchronous lectures. 3. Laboratory Text: "Laboratory Notes for CE 357 - Geotechnical Engineering." (Available on-line in Canvas for each Lab). 4. Other Materials: To plot data and perform graphical solutions in homework assignments, laboratory reports, and exams, you must have a straight edge,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evaluation of Nontraditional Soil and Aggregate Stabilizers the University of Texas at Austin Authors: Alan F
    CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN Project Summary Report 7-1993-S Center for Transportation Research Project 7-1993: Evaluation of Nontraditional Soil and Aggregate Stabilizers The University of Texas at Austin Authors: Alan F. Rauch, Lynn E. Katz, and Howard M. Liljestrand May 2003 EVALUATION OF NONTRADITIONAL SOIL AND AGGREGATE STABILIZERS: A SUMMARY and at ten times the recommended tography (GPC), UV/Vis spectroscopy, Introduction application rates. These tests failed to and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) Proprietary chemical products are show significant, consistent changes spectroscopy. In some cases, we syn- marketed by a number of companies for in the engineering properties of the thesized the stabilizer components in stabilizing pavement base and subgrade test soils following treatment with the the laboratory or purchased them from soils. Usually supplied as concentrated three selected products at the applica- other chemical supply companies to liquids, these products are diluted in tion rates used. verify our conclusions. water on the project site and sprayed The three stabilizer products were on the soil to be treated prior to mix- What We Did... then reacted with three reference clays ing and compaction. If effective, these We began by selecting three and five native Texas clay soils. We products might be used as alternatives commercially available, liquid soil tested samples of the well-character- for treating sulfate-rich soils, which are stabilizer products for evaluation. ized, reference clays (kaolinite, illite, susceptible to excessive heaving when Although no effort was made to as- and montmorillonite) to increase the treated with traditional, calcium-based semble and classify a comprehensive likelihood of observing subtle physi- stabilizers such as lime, cement, and fly list of available products and suppliers, cal-chemical changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Isotropic Work Softening Model for Frictional
    Yang, K.-H., Nogueira, C., and Zornberg, J.G. (2008). “Isotropic Work Softening Model for Frictional Geomaterials: Development Based on Lade and Kim soil Constitutive Model.” Proceedings of the XXIX Iberian Latin American Congress on Computational Methods in Engineering, CILAMCE 2008, Maceio, Brazil, November 4-7, pp. 1-17 (CD-ROM). ISOTROPIC WORK SOFTENING MODEL FOR FRICTIONAL GEOMATERIALS: DEVELOPMENT BASED ON LADE AND KIM CONSTITUTIVE SOIL MODEL Kuo-Hsin Yang [email protected] Dept. of Civil Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Texas, Austin, USA Christianne de Lyra Nogueira [email protected] Dept. of Mine Engineering, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil Jorge G. Zornberg [email protected] Dept. of Civil Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Texas, Austin, USA Abstract: An isotropic softening model for predicting the post-peak behavior of frictional geomaterials is presented. The proposed softening model is a function of plastic work which can include all possible stress-strain combinations. The development of softening model is based on the Lade and Kim constitutive soil model but improves previous work by characterizing the size of decaying yield surface more realistically by assuming an inverse sigmoid function. Compared to original softening model using the exponential decay function, the benefits of using the inverse sigmoid function are highlighted as: (1) provide a smoother transition from hardening to softening occurring at the peak strength point, and (2) limit the decrease of yield surface at a residual yield surface, which is a minimum size of yield surface during softening. The proposed softening model requires three parameters; each parameter has it own physical meaning and can be easily calibrated by a triaxial compression test.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Composts : Moisture Holding and Water Quality
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/TX-04/0-4403-2 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date AUGUST 2003 CHARACTERISTICS OF COMPOSTS: MOISTURE HOLDING 6. Performing Organization Code AND WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Christine J. Kirchhoff, Dr. Joseph F. Malina, Jr., P.E., DEE, and Dr. 0-4403-2 Michael Barrett, P.E. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research 11. Contract or Grant No. The University of Texas at Austin 0-4403 3208 Red River, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78705-2650 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Research Report Research and Technology Implementation Office 9/1/2001-8/31-2003 P.O. Box 5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, TX 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and the Texas Department of Transportation. 16. Abstract The objective of this study was investigation of the potential beneficial use of compost manufactured topsoil in highway rights-of-way in Texas. The water holding capacity and the physical, chemical and microbiological characteristics of composted manures (dairy cattle, poultry litter, and feedlot), composted biosolids and sandy and clay soil; compost manufacture topsoil (CMT) that contained composted manures or composted biosolids mixed with either sandy soil or clay soil; as well as erosion control compost (ECC) that contained compost and wood chips were evaluated.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoysynthetic Reinforced Embankment Slopes Akshay Kumar Jha and Madhav Madhira
    Chapter Geoysynthetic Reinforced Embankment Slopes Akshay Kumar Jha and Madhav Madhira Abstract Slope failures lead to loss of life and damage to property. Slope instability of natural slope depends on natural and manmade factors such as excessive rainfall, earthquakes, deforestation, unplanned construction activity, etc. Manmade slopes are formed for embankments and cuttings. Steepening of slopes for construc- tion of rail/road embankments or for widening of existing roads is a necessity for development. Use of geosynthetics for steep slope construction considering design and environmental aspects could be a viable alternative to these issues. Methods developed for unreinforced slopes have been extended to analyze geosynthetic reinforced slopes accounting for the presence of reinforcement. Designing geosyn- thetic reinforced slope with minimum length of geosynthetics leads to economy. This chapter presents review of literature and design methodologies available for reinforced slopes with granular and marginal backfills. Optimization of reinforce- ment length from face end of the slope and slope - reinforcement interactions are also presented. Keywords: slopes, geosynthetics, reinforcement, optimization of length, marginal soils, steepening 1. Introduction Landslides in slopes and failures of embankment and cut slopes lead to loss of life and property. Several factors, natural and manmade, such as heavy rainfall, unplanned construction, deforestation, restricting waterways of rivers and their tributaries are major causes for instability of slopes. Factors controlling stability of natural slopes are type of soil, environmental conditions, groundwater, stress history, rainfall, cloud burst, earthquakes, etc. Landslide mortality rate exceeds one per 100 km2 per year in developing countries like India, China, Nepal, Peru, Venezuela, Philippines and Tajikistan [1, 2].
    [Show full text]
  • FHWA/TX-07/0-5202-1 Accession No
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/TX-07/0-5202-1 Accession No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Determination of Field Suction Values, Hydraulic Properties, August 2005; Revised March 2007 and Shear Strength in High PI Clays 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Jorge G. Zornberg, Jeffrey Kuhn, and Stephen Wright 0-5202-1 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research 11. Contract or Grant No. The University of Texas at Austin 0-5202 3208 Red River, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78705-2650 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical Report Research and Technology Implementation Office September 2004–August 2006 P.O. Box 5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, TX 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Project Title: Determination of Field Suction Values in High PI Clays for Various Surface Conditions and Drain Installations 16. Abstract Moisture infiltration into highway embankments constructed by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) using high Plasticity Index (PI) clays results in changes in shear strength and in flow pattern that leads to recurrent slope failures. In addition, soil cracking over time increases the rate of moisture infiltration. The overall objective of this research is to determine the suction, hydraulic properties, and shear strength of high PI Texas clays. Specifically, two comprehensive experimental programs involving the characterization of unsaturated properties and the shear strength of a high PI clay (Eagle Ford clay) were conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Mechanisms and Efficacy of Three Liquid Chemical Soil Stabilizers
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 1993-1 2. Government 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/TX-03/1993-1 (Volume 1) Accession No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date AN ANALYSIS OF THE MECHANISMS AND EFFICACY May 2003 OF THREE LIQUID CHEMICAL SOIL STABILIZERS: VOLUME 1 7. Author(s) 6. Performing Organization Code Alan F. Rauch, Lynn E. Katz, and Howard M. Liljestrand 8. Performing Organization Report No. 1993-1 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research The University of Texas at Austin 11. Contract or Grant No. 3208 Red River, Suite 200 Research Project 7-1993 Austin, TX 78705-2650 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Research Report Research and Technology Implementation Office 14. Sponsoring Agency Code P.O. Box 5080 Austin, TX 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project conducted in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. 16. Abstract Liquid chemical products are marketed by a number of companies for stabilizing pavement base and subgrade soils. If effective, these products could be used as alternatives for treating sulfate-rich soils, which are susceptible to excessive heaving when treated with traditional, calcium-based stabilizers like lime, cement, and fly ash. However, the chemical composition, stabilizing mechanisms, and performance of these liquid products are not well understood. The primary objective of this study was to investigate and identify the mechanisms by which clay soils are modified or altered by these liquid chemical agents.
    [Show full text]
  • Slope Stability Charts
    The University of Texas Department of Civil Engineering Professor Stephen G. Wright SLOPE STABILITY - CHARTS OR STABILITY NUMBERS Bell, James M. (1966) "Dimensionless Parameters for Homogeneous Earth Slopes," Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 92, No. SM5, September, pp. 51-65. Bell, James M. (1968) Closure to "Dimensional Parameters for Homogeneous Earth Slopes," Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 94, No. SM3, May, pp. 763-766. Bishop, A.W. and Morgenstern, Norbert (1960) "Stability Coefficients for Earth Slopes," Geotechnique, Institution of Civil Engineers, London, Vol. 10, No. 4, December, pp. 129-150. Cousins, Brian F. (1978) "Stability Charts for Simple Earth Slopes," Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 104, No. GT2, February, pp. 267-279. Desai, Chandrakant S. (1977) "Drawdown Analysis of Slopes by Numerical Method," Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 103, No. GT7, July, pp. 667-676. Duncan, J.M. and Buchignani, A.L. (1975) An Engineering Manual for Slope Stability Studies, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, March, 83 p. Ellis, Harold B. (1973) "Use of Cycloidal Arcs for Estimating Ditch Safety," Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 99, No. SM2, February, pp. 165-179. Giger, Max W. and Krizek, Raymond J. (1976) "Stability of Vertical Corner Cut with Concentrated Surcharge Load," Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 92, No. GT1, January, pp. 31-40. Huang, Yang H. (1977) "Stability Coefficients for Sidehill Benches," Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 103, No. GT5, May, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Reliability-Based Design for External Stability of Narrow Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls: Calibration from Centrifuge Tests
    Reliability-Based Design for External Stability of Narrow Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls: Calibration from Centrifuge Tests Kuo-Hsin Yang1; Jianye Ching, M.ASCE2; and Jorge G. Zornberg, M.ASCE3 Abstract: A narrow mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) wall is defined as a MSE wall placed adjacent to an existing stable wall, with a width less than that established in current guidelines. Because of space constraints and interactions with the existing stable wall, various studies have suggested that the mechanics of narrow walls differ from those of conventional walls. This paper presents the reliability-based design (RBD) for external stability (i.e., sliding and overturning) of narrow MSE walls with wall aspects L=H ranging from 0.2 to 0.7. The reduction in earth pressure pertaining to narrow walls is considered by multiplying a reduction factor by the conventional earth pressure. The probability distribution of the reduction factor is calibrated based on Bayesian analysis by using the results of a series of centrifuge tests on narrow walls. The stability against bearing capacity failure and the effect of water pressure within MSE walls are not calibrated in this study because they are not modeled in the centrifuge tests. An RBD method considering variability in soil parameters, wall dimensions, and traffic loads is applied to establish the relationship between target failure probability and the required safety factor. A design example is provided to illustrate the design procedure. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000423. © 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers. CE Database subject headings: Earth pressure; Centrifuge models; Walls; Soil structures; Calibration.
    [Show full text]
  • SIDEWALK CROSS-SLOPE DESIGN: ANALYSIS of October 2001 Rev
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/TX-03/4171-1 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date SIDEWALK CROSS-SLOPE DESIGN: ANALYSIS OF October 2001 Rev. May 2002 ACCESSIBILITY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES 7. Author(s) 6. Performing Organization Code Kara M.Kockelman, Lydia Heard, Young-Jun Kweon, Thomas W. Rioux 8. Performing Organization Report No. 4171-1 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research The University of Texas at Austin 11. Contract or Grant No. 3208 Red River, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78705-2650 Research Project 0-4171 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Research Report Research and Technology Implementation Office 14. Sponsoring Agency Code P.O. Box 5080 Austin, TX 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and the Texas Department of Transportation. 16. Abstract Current and proposed Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines offer no specific guidance on acceptable maximum cross slopes where constraints of reconstruction prohibit meeting the 2-percent maximum cross-slope requirement for new construction. Two types of sidewalk test-section data across a sample of 50 individuals were collected, combined with an earlier sample of 17 records of participation, and analyzed here, with an emphasis on cross slopes. These examined heart-rate changes and user perception of discomfort levels, and they relied on a random-effects model and an ordered-probit model, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Compaction Requirements for Placement (1874-S)
    CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN Center for Project Summary Report 1874-S Transportation Research Assessment of Cohesionless Materials to Be Used as Compacted Fill The University of Texas at Austin Authors: Stephen G. Wright, Brad J. Arcement, and Eric R. Marx Recommended Compaction Requirements for Placement of Uniform Fine Sand Backfill Materials Objective and Scope Particular attention was paid pacted using each of the to the laboratory compaction following compaction proce- of Project procedures used and the dures: The objective of this specifications for field • TxDOT Tx 113-E- project was to develop compaction. Laboratory Compaction recommendations for com- Selection of Soil for Testing Characteristics and paction of cohesionless soils TxDOT selected several Moisture-Density Rela- used as backfill materials. sources of cohesionless fill tionship of Base Materials The Texas Department of materials for testing and • ASTM D 1557-Labora- Transportation (TxDOT) evaluation. Initially, attention tory Compaction Charac- utilizes a number of sources was focused on the El Paso teristics of Soil Using of cohesionless soils as fill area where abundant sources Modified Effort materials for embankment of cohesionless fill materials • British Standard BS-1377 construction and as backfill are available and used. Nine -Vibrating Hammer for mechanically stabilized sources of fill material were Method earth (MSE) walls. Some identified in the El Paso area • ASTM D 4253-Maximum problems have been experi- and samples were obtained Index Density and Unit enced with these materials in for further laboratory testing. Weight of Soils Using a the past, especially with After the initial selection of Vibratory Table settlements of backfills soils from the El Paso area, All tests using the Tx behind retaining walls.
    [Show full text]
  • GMS 10.1 Tutorial UTEXAS – Dam with Seepage Use SEEP2D and UTEXAS to Model Seepage and Slope Stability of an Earth Dam
    v. 10.1 GMS 10.1 Tutorial UTEXAS – Dam with Seepage Use SEEP2D and UTEXAS to model seepage and slope stability of an earth dam Objectives Learn how to build an integrated SEEP2D/UTEXAS model in GMS. Prerequisite Tutorials Required Components Time • SEEP2D – Earth Dam • GIS • 25–40 minutes • UTEXAS – Natural Slope • Map Module • Mesh Module • SEEP2D • UTEXAS Page 1 of 16 © Aquaveo 2015 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Outline .......................................................................................................................... 3 2 Program Mode..................................................................................................................... 3 3 Getting Started .................................................................................................................... 3 4 Set the Units ......................................................................................................................... 4 5 Save the GMS Project File ................................................................................................. 4 6 Create the Conceptual Model Features ............................................................................. 5 6.1 Create the Points .......................................................................................................... 5 6.2 Create the Arcs and Polygons ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Slope Stability References Alonso, EE
    1 The University of Texas Department of Civil Engineering Professor Stephen G. Wright Slope Stability References Alonso, E. E., "Risk Analysis of Slopes and Its Application to Slopes in Canadian Sensitive Clays," Geotechnique, Great Britain, Vol. 26, No. 3, Sept., 1976, pp. 453-472. Baker, R., "Determination of the Critical Slip Surface in Slope Stability Computations," International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol. 4, No. 4, Oct.-Dec., 1980, pp. 333-359. Baligh, Mohsen, and Amr S. Azzouz, "End Effects on Stability of Cohesive Slopes," Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 101, No. GT11, Nov., 1975, pp. 1105-1117. Baligh, M. M., A. S. Azzouz, and C. C. Ladd, "Line Loads on Cohesive Slopes," Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Tokyo, Vol. 2, 1977, pp. 13-16. Bazett, D.J., Adams, J.I. and Matyas, E.L. (1961) "An Investigation of Slides in a Test Trench Excavated in Fissured Sensitive Marine Clay," Proceedings, Fifth International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol. 1, pp. 431-435. Beene, R.R.W. (1967) "Waco Dam Slide," Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 93, SM4, July, pp. 35-44. Bell, James M. (1966), "Dimensionless Parameters for Homogeneous Earth Slopes," Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 92, No. SM5, Sept., pp. 51-65. Bell, James M. ·(1968) "General Slope Stability Analysis," Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 94, No. SM6, November, pp. 1253-1270. Binger, W.V. (1948) "Analytical Studies of Panama Canal Slides," Proceedings, Second International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol.
    [Show full text]