Archaeology University College Cork

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Archaeology University College Cork 194 WOODSTOWN: A VIKING-AGE SETTLEMENT IN CO. WATERFORD 7· 5 SILVER John Sheehan Introduction Forty-two items of Viking-Age silver have been found at Woodstown, Co. Waterford, mostly in hack-silver form. Of these, forty were recovered from the site's removed topsoil layers, either through metal detecting or, to a much lesser extent, by dry sieving. Preliminary analysis of the very large number of topsoil finds indicated an extensive disturbance of this material, resulting from ploughing within the site's soil mantle since its use, with little evidence to relate the artefacts to one another or to underlying features (O'Brien et al. 2005, 66-y). The remaining two finds were conventionally excavated, from stratified deposits, but were not associated with each other. The scattered nature of the silver on the site indicates that it was randomly lost, piece by piece, probably during the circulation of currency in the course of trade. The Woodstown collection, therefore, must be regarded as an 'assemblage' rather than a hoard, and as such it represents the first find of a significant number of individual silver items from a Scandinavian settlement site in Ireland. Given that only a small area of the site was archaeologically investigated, it is likely that this material represents only a moderate proportion of the original amount of silver that circulated and came to be lost there. The obvious comparanda for the items that make up the Woodstown material, which are predominantly ingots and ingot-derived hack-silver, lie in Ireland's silver hoards. However, the question of whether there actually is a meaningful and direct correspondence between the Woodstown assemblage and the phenomena represented by Ireland's hoards is debatable. Many of the hoards represent wealth, including the display and storage of it in the form of complete ornaments, while the assemblage of hack-silver from this site represents the use of wealth as currency. Discoveries made over the past decade or so in Scandinavia, Britain and, now, Ireland, suggest that, apart from single finds, there are two main distinct classes of contexts for Viking-Age silver - hoards and assemblages from settlement finds. Unfortunately, there is, as yet, no equivalent for the Woodstown silver assemblage from Viking-Age Dublin or, indeed, from elsewhere in Ireland (though the results from the recent commencement of work on the Linn Duachaill longphort, Co. Louth, seem promising in this regard). However, there are comparable assemblages from elsewhere in the Viking world, most notably from the central places at Kaupang, Vestfold, Norway (Hardh 2008), and Uppakra, Skane, Sweden (Hardh 2ooo), as well as from the winter camp established by the Danish 'great army' at Torksey, Lincolnshire, in 872-3 (Blackburn 20 I I). In each of these cases, it appears that the finds represent random losses from the pools of silver that circulated in these settlements. As was the case at Woodstown, most of the silver at these sites occurs in the form of hack-silver and is often highly fragmented, and, significantly, all of the sites have also produced impressive quantities of balance-scale weights. The Woodstown silver collection comprises two complete ingots, eleven hack-silver ingot terminals, thirteen further hack-silver ingot fragments, six hack-silver fragments of arm-rings, with two different forms represented, a hack-silver fragment of sheet, a brooch fragment, possibly hack-silver, a weight, a rod fragment and six pieces of casting waste (fig. 7. 54). In addition, the site has produced an iron rod fragment, striated and with silver inlay. Although this may not be classified as a silver/hack-silver item, it is included here for METAL 195 Figure 7.54 (Above) Selection of silver assemblage recovered from Woodstown. L. of longest complete ingot 60.9mm. Figure 7.55 (Right) Ingot from metalworking furnace 02E0441 :2367:3. L. 31.9mm (photograph: Studio lab). convenience. With two exceptions, all of the above were retrieved from topsoil and were therefore out of their primary archaeological contexts. Of the two finds from stratified deposits, the first derived from a post-medieval field bank (O'Brien et al. 2005, 63), clearly not its original context (o2E0441:1999:3 1) , while the second, a complete ingot (fig. 7· 55), derives from a fill within an apparent furnace (o2E0441:2367=3). This furnace, which was predominantly used for iron production, is of interest as preliminary analysis indicated that it also produced evidence of small scale, non-ferrous metalworking, including both of copper alloy and of silver (ch. 6). The finds from this feature include a lead balance-scale weight as well as the silver ingot (ch. 4.1), an association that would not be unexpected in an ingot-production context, as well as sherds of cupels/'heating-trays'. Cupel sherds were also recovered from other areas of the site (ch. 8.rc). It has been suggested that cupels, which were used in the assaying and refining of silver in several other contexts in Viking-Age Scandinavia, as well as in Hiberno- WOODSTOWN: A VIKING-AGE SETTLEMENT IN CO. WATERFORD Scandinavian Dublin, functioned as an element in the control of the production and use of silver as a means of payment, in the same way as balance-scales and weights did (Soderberg 2004, 122-3). Indeed, Young's analyses of several of the Woodstown cupels demonstrate that they were used in silver assaying, and that some crucibles were used for melting silver. To date, consideration of the Woodstown furnace and its associated material indicates the possibility of on-site silver-smelting, and the possible production of ingots. However, while the silver finds from the site also include a number of pieces of casting waste, this material does not in itself necessarily represent on-site silverworking. This is so because casting waste also occurs in a number of hoards from Britain and Ireland (below), indicating that it formed part of the broad pool of silver that was circulating in the Irish Sea area during the Viking Age. Nevertheless, despite this reservation, silver smithing and artefact production at Woodstown may seem a plausible possibility within the overall archaeological context of the site. If this is the case, then the first archaeologically attested evidence for Scandinavian silverworking in Ireland potentially emerges from Woodstown, even though it is accepted that Viking-Age Dublin was a more important silverworking centre. Each item of silver from the Woodstown assemblage is identified and described below. A discussion of each object-type is presented in terms of its cultural attribution and date. An overview of the material is presented within the context of related assemblages from the Scandinavian world and, finally, the potential connections of the Woodstown silver with Viking-Age hoards from early medieval Munster are explored. The Woodstown assemblage Ingots and ingot hack-silver Ingots and ingot-derived hack-silver dominate the Woodstown silver, accounting for twenty­ six of the forty-two silver items from the site. The ingots and related hack-silver are of the standard Viking-Age type- oblong bar-shaped, usually of plano-convex, trapezoidal or sub­ rectangular cross-section, most often with rounded terminals - and, as such, they do not exhibit any diagnostic features that could be of use in defining their period of currency. Ingots form a significant element of Viking-Age hoards throughout the Viking world, and functioned primarily as a simple means of storing bullion. They occur, in either complete or hack-silver form, in at least half of the eighty recorded pre-ADrooo silver hoards from Ireland that contain non-numismatic material. Sixteen of these finds also contain coins and thus their deposition dates may be determined, generally to within a short timespan. All of these are of tenth-century date, though the large number of ingots and ingot-derived hack­ silver in the Cuerdale hoard, Lancashire, deposited c.905-10 and possibly originating in large part in Hiberno-Scandinavian Dublin (Graham-Campbell 1987, 332- 6),9 serve to illustrate that ingots must also have been in circulation in Ireland during the last decades of the ninth century. Other evidence, including the unusual nature of ingots in a small number of hoards from Ireland that are ornamented with cruciform motifs that only find parallel in the Cuerdale find, suggests that ingots were more common in later ninth-century Ireland than the evidence of the coin-dated hoards alone indicates. It is also relevant to note in this regard that ingots or ingot-derived hack-silver occur in association with ornaments in fifteen non-coin dated hoards from Ireland, in most cases with Hiberno-Scandinavian broad-band arm-rings, a type that developed during the later ninth century, perhaps c.88o, and continued in general circulation until c.930 (Sheehan 201 r, 99-100). 9 For an alternative view, see Williams 201 r, 70-r. METAL 197 In short, therefore, the overall evidence indicates that ingots were more common in later ninth-century Ireland than the evidence of the coin-dated hoards alone indicates, and that they formed a regular element of Ireland's tenth-century hoards. On the basis of this evidence, the ingots and ingot-derived hack-silver, which forms the bulk of the Woodstown silver material, could date to anywhere between the mid-ninth and the end of the tenth century. One of the two silver finds from a stratified context at Woodstown- an ingot (fig. 7. 55) -was recovered from a fill within what was identified as a smithing hearth within the ditch of Enclosure One. A radiocarbon date of AD420-620 was obtained from a sample of oak charcoal from one of the hearth's fills, which was stratigraphically lower than the fill from which the ingot was derived (ch.
Recommended publications
  • "HARBOUR PRIDE", OFF HOOK HEAD, CO. WEXFORD 17Th SEPTEMBER 2009
    Leeson Lane, Dublin 2. Telephone: 01-678 3485/86. Fax: 01-678 3493. email: [email protected] www.mcib.ie REPORT OF INVESTIGATION INTO FATALITY OVERBOARD FROM MFV "HARBOUR PRIDE", OFF HOOK HEAD, CO. WEXFORD 17th SEPTEMBER 2009. The Marine Casualty Investigation Board was established on the 25th March, 2003 under The Merchant Shipping (Investigation of Marine Casualties) Act 2000 The copyright in the enclosed report remains with the Marine Casualty Investigation Board by virtue of section 35(5) of the Merchant Shipping (Investigation of Marine Casualties) Act, 2000. No person may produce, reproduce or transmit in any form or by any means this report or any part thereof without the express REPORT No. MCIB/177 permission of the Marine Casualty (No. 1 of 2010) Investigation Board. This report may be freely used for educational purposes. 1 Report MCIB/177 published by The Marine Casualty Investigation Board 7th May 2010. 2 CONTENTS PAGE 1. SYNOPSIS 4 2. FACTUAL INFORMATION 5 3. EVENTS PRIOR TO THE INCIDENT 7 4. THE INCIDENT 8 5. EVENTS FOLLOWING THE INCIDENT 10 6. CONCLUSIONS 11 7. RECOMMENDATIONS 12 8. LIST OF APPENDICES 13 9. LIST OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED 19 3 SYNOPSIS 1. SYNOPSIS 1.1 Mr. Patrick (Paddy) Mason sailed from Dunmore East, County Waterford, on 17th September 2009 with the intention of working his crab pots on the County Wexford side of Waterford Harbour. When his boat was seen to manoeuvre erratically the alarm was raised. Mr. Mason’s drowned remains were subsequently recovered from the water after a short search. 1.2 Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Óenach Clochair, Co. Limerick. Journal of Irish Archaeology 2014, 23, 171-187
    Gleeson P. Assembly and élite culture in Iron Age and late Antique Europe: a case study of Óenach Clochair, Co. Limerick. Journal of Irish Archaeology 2014, 23, 171-187. Copyright: © The author, 2014. This is an authenticated version of an article that has been published in the Journal of Irish Archaeology. Gleeson P. Assembly and élite culture in Iron Age and late Antique Europe: a case study of Óenach Clochair, Co. Limerick. Journal of Irish Archaeology 2014, 23, 171-187. Date deposited: 05/02/2016 Embargo release date: 01 December 2018 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License Newcastle University ePrints - eprint.ncl.ac.uk Assembly and élite culture in Iron Age and late Antique Europe: a case-study of Óenach Clochair, Co. Limerick Patrick Gleeson Winner of the 2014 JIA Postgraduate Prize School of History, Classics and Archaeology, Newcastle University, UK ([email protected]) This paper explores Óenach Clochair, an assembly landscape surrounding Knocklong, Co. Limerick, within its wider context. It examines its character, composition, extent and historical significance, suggesting that it was a place of regional assembly for Munster from the seventh–eighth century AD. Analysis focuses on assessing evidence for late Iron Age and early medieval activity, concentrating specifically on late Antiquity (fourth–seventh centuries AD). Through this prism it frames discussion of the broader phenomenon of assembly in Ireland within the context of developments else - where in post-Roman western Europe. Concurrently, it offers a brief analysis of one of the more important hoards of Roman material thus far found in Ireland: the Balline hoard, suggesting a socio-political context for its origins and location.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Clontarf 1014
    Clontarf 1014 – a battle of the clans? 1. The contemporary record In its account of the battle of Clontarf the northern AU report that Brian, son of Cennétig, king of Ireland, and Máel Sechnaill mac Domnaill, king of Tara, led an army to Dublin (Áth Cliath) • all of the Leinsterman (Laigin) were assembled to meet him (Brian), the foreigners of Áth Cliath, and a similar number of foreigners of Lochlainn (Scotland) • a sterling battle was fought between them, the like of which had never been encountered before Then the foreigners and the Leinstermen first broke in defeat and were completely wiped out • there fell on the side of the foreign troop Máel Mórda, king of Leinster, and Domnall, king of the Forthuatha • of the foreigners fell Dubgall, son of Amlaíb (= Óláfr), Sigurd, earl (jarl) of Orkney, and Gilla Ciaráin, heir designate of the foreigners, etc. • Brodar who slew Brian, chief of the Scandinavian fleet, together with 6,000 others was also killed or drowned Of the Irish who fell in the counter-shock were Brian, overking of the Irish of Ireland and of the foreigners [of Limerick and Waterford] and of the Britons [of Wales?], the Augustus of the whole of the north-west of Europe [= Ireland] • his son Murchad and the latter’s son Tairdelbach, Conaing, the heir designate of Mumu, Mothla, king of the Déisi Muman, etc. • the list includes numerous kings of various parts of Munster, plus Domnall, the earl of Marr in Scotland • this list carries conviction when analysed against known details The southern AI report similarly, though more
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Technical Summary Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental
    May 2019 Non-Technical Summary Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report For Consultation June/July 2019 REGAN REGAN ʹ Port of Waterford Master Plan MALONE O MALONE Form ES - 04 Ground Floor – Unit 3 Bracken Business Park Bracken Road, Sandyford Dublin 18, D18 V32Y Tel: +353- 1- 567 76 55 Email: [email protected] Title: Non-Technical Summary, Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report, Port of Waterford Master Plan, Port of Waterford Company Job Number: E1475 Prepared By: Amelia Keane Signed: _________________________ Checked By: Klara Kovacic Signed: _________________________ Approved By: Kevin O’Regan Signed: _________________________ Revision Record Issue Date Description Remark Prepared Checked Approved No. 01 20/05/19 Report FINAL AK KK KOR Copyright and Third-Party Disclaimer MOR has prepared this report for the sole use of our client (as named on the front the report) in accordance with the Client’s instructions using all reasonable skill and competence and generally accepted consultancy principles. The report was prepared in accordance with the budget and terms of reference agreed with the Client and does not in any way constitute advice to any third party who is able to access it by any means. MOR excludes to the fullest extent lawfully permitted all liability whatsoever for any costs, liabilities or losses arising as a result of or reliance upon the contents of this report by any person or legal entity (other than the Client in accordance with the terms of reference). MOR has not verified any documents or information supplied by third parties and referred to herein in compiling this document and no warranty is provided as part of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • The Suir Its Source to The
    THE SUIR ITS SO URC E TO THE SEA. L . M . M CCRAI TH , Aut “ hor of A GR E E N TR E E . T h e n t l S ui r t h a t m k i n w g e e . a g a y ” B s w e e t C lo n m l a d o r n s r i c h W a t o r d . y e , e r f ’ n “ Spe se r s Fa e r ie Q uee n . Ql lo um el ' THE CL ONJI E L CH R ON I CL E - NE WSPAPE P AI D PRI N TL G WO R KS , L TD . 1 912 . E miratiun . J E . M . G , T O WH OM T HI S B O O K AN D I TS WRITER OWE MU CH . CO TE N NTS . TH E SON G O F T H E SU IR I NT R O DU CTI ON TE MPLE M ORE T H URLE S H O LY CRO SS GO LDE N ATH ASSE L PRIORY ’ ST PE KA . UN S WE LL KNO CKGR AFFO N ’ TH E KING S STO NE TH E FO RD O F KNO CKGR AF FO N KI LLARDR I GH CAH IR CAH IR ABB E Y CAH IR CAST LE CAH I B PAR K GARNAV ILLA R O CH E ST OW N ARDFINN AN L ADY ABBE Y N E W CAST LE KNO CKLO F TY MARLF IE LD I NN I SLO N AG H ABB E Y ’ PATR I OR S WE ST .
    [Show full text]
  • SERBD Suir 2018-1
    Fish in Rivers Factsheet SERBD River Suir Factsheet: 2018/7 The River Suir is one of Ireland’s largest rivers. It rises large catchment and is comprised of limestone, just north of Templemore, Co. Tipperary and flows in sandstone and conglomerate. The primary land use a southerly direction through Thurles and Cahir before type is agriculture. The lower reaches of this river fall turning eastwards through Clonmel, Carrick-on-Suir within the Lower River Suir Special Area of and Waterford. It joins the River Barrow at Conservation. Cheekpoint only a few kilometres from its mouth at Ten sites were surveyed on the River Suir between the Waterford Harbour. Geology is mixed throughout this 28th and 31st of August 2018. The River Suir at Ferryhouse, Co. Tipperary 1 SERBD River Suir Factsheet: 2018/7 Fig 1. Map of River Suir survey sites, 2018 Site survey details, River Suir, 2018 No. River Site Method WFD Date 1 Suir, River Ardmayle Br. SP (Boat) - 28/08/2018 2 Suir, River Springmount SP (Boat) - 28/08/2018 3 Suir, River u/s of Golden SP (Boat) - 28/08/2018 4 Suir, River Swiss Cottage SP (Boat) - 29/08/2018 5 Suir, River Clocully SP (Boat) - 29/08/2018 6 Suir, River Kilmaneen SP (Boat) - 29/08/2018 7 Suir, River d/s Knocklofty SP (Boat) - 30/08/2018 8 Suir, River Loughtally SP (Boat) - 30/08/2018 9 Suir, River Ferryhouse SP (Boat) - 30/08/2018 10 Suir, River Kilsheelan Br. SP (Boat) Yes 31/08/2018 SP (Single Pass electrofishing) 2 SERBD River Suir Factsheet: 2018/7 2 Minimum density estimates (no.
    [Show full text]
  • Inspector's Report ABP-309266-21
    Inspector’s Report ABP-309266-21 Development To construct a wheelchair accessible ramp access with entrance gate and associated works to access proposed pontoon facility. (An NIS included.) Location Main Quay, Cheekpoint, County Waterford. Planning Authority Waterford City and County Council Planning Authority Reg. Ref. 20217 Applicant(s) Cheekpoint Boat Owners Ass. Type of Application Permission Planning Authority Decision Grant with conditions Type of Appeal Third Party Appellant(s) 1. Sean Doherty 2. Pat Moran Observer(s) None Date of Site Inspection 25th of March 2021 Inspector Caryn Coogan ABP-309266-21 Inspector’s Report Page 1 of 26 1.0 Site Location and Description 1.1 The site is located in Cheekpoint Harbour which is located within the Lower Suir Estuary on the southern bank of the River Suir in Co. Waterford. Cheekpoint is a coastal village, located east of Waterford City, at the confluence of the River Barrow and the River Suir. The village commands scenic views of Waterford Harbour. On the opposite side of the river along the north banks there is the Great island Power station in Co. Wexford. 1.2 The built heritage of the Harbour, consists of elements of the late 18th Century harbour such as the small stone pier and low quay walls, a row of 18th Century renovated single storey fisherman’s cottages, Daisybank House (1765) and the Mount (1750). The harbour/ pier is L-shaped. 1.3 Cheekpoint Harbour is prone to silting. In 1995 a series of groynes were built 200metres out in the river to divert the Cheekpoint Bar, which was a mudbank impeding large vessels traveling up the river, which resulted in Checkpoint silting up and now Waterford Port has to regularly dredge the river in the vicinity of Cheekpoint to ensure access to the quay.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Evidence for the Different Expressions of Scandinavian Settlement in Ireland, 840-1100
    CHAPTER THIRTY-TWO ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR THE DIFFERENT EXPRESSIONS OF SCANDINAVIAN SETTLEMENT IN IRELAND, 840-1100 Patrick F. Wallace nstead of speculating on what exactly the Irish chroniclers who described the Imid-ninth-century Scandinavian fortresses in Ireland äs longpbuirt (literally 'ship fortresses') meant by the term, it is intended here merely to provide an overview of the archaeological evidence äs it presently exists for the different types of Scandinavian- inspired settlements which existed in Viking Age Ireland. Best understood and most enduring are the towm of Dublin, Waterford, Limerick and Wexford. In their developed form in the tenth-, eleventh- and early twelfth-century Hiberno-Norse phase, these consisted of large defended settlements at the tidal conflu- ences of main rivers and their tributaries. They were located on high ground traversed by ascending streets which, together with laneways and intramural accesses, formed irregulär rather than gridded networks. Boundary fences radiated from the streets forming rows of contiguous rectangular or trapezoid plots into which settlements were divided. The archaeological record preserves rieh evidence for the buildings and layout of plots particularly at Dublin, Waterford and Wexford äs well äs at Cork where recent excavations have unearthed what had hitherto been regarded äs urban houses of Hiberno-Norse type in an indigenous urban settlement of the later eleventh- and early twelfth-century period. It appears that access through individual plots was controlled. Main buildings had their narrow ends to streets or laneways, had pathways leading to the entrances and from back entrances to lesser outbuildings and sheds in the yards at the back of the plots.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Sediment and Benthic Studies Waterford Harbour Dredging and Disposal Operations
    Marine Sediment and Benthic Studies Waterford Harbour Dredging and Disposal Operations Produced by AQUAFACT International Services Ltd On behalf of Port of Waterford Company November 2017 For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. AQUAFACT INTERNATIONAL SERVICES LTD., 12 KILKERRIN PARK, LIOSBAUN, TUAM RD., GALWAY. www.aquafact.ie [email protected] tel +353 (0) 91 756812 EPA Export 20-12-2017:03:47:54 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................... 1 2. Faunal Benthic Survey .................................................................................... 4 2.1. Materials & Methods ........................................................................................... 4 2.1.1. Sampling Procedure ..................................................................................................... 4 2.1.2. Sample Processing ....................................................................................................... 6 2.1.3. Data Analysis ............................................................................................................... 7 2.2. Results ................................................................................................................ 10 2.2.1. Community Analysis .................................................................................................. 10 2.2.1.1. Univariate Analysis ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • As Surprising As It May Be to Some, Christ
    Sitric ^Silkbeard^ Family Fireworks, and Viking Age Ireland: When Blood Kin, In-Laws, and Outlaws Read Like a'Who's Who in the Royal Zoo' of Queen Gormlaith Dr. James J. S. Johnson For where envying and strife is, there is confusion and every evil work. (James 3:16) If aViking ruled over Ireland's busy port of Dublin, for more than 40 years, one might expect that Viking had good connections -political networks and family dynasty links. True enough, but those royal connections also came with alot of family conflict baggage! This mix of family politics, applied to Viking-style conflict resolution processes, is repeatedly illustrated in the family life and political career of Dublin's Viking ruler Sitric "Silkbeard" (a/k/a "Silkenbeard") Olafsson.^ Of course. Vikings in Ireland are known by both their Irish and their Norse names. and variants abound when spelling those names —so Sitric's name appears in variants including Sigtrygg, Sigtryg, Sigtryggr, Sihtric, and Sitrick. Sitric was not an uncommon Viking name, but history only knows one Viking nicknamed Silkbeard" (or "Silkenbeard"), so that is how he will often be identified here. ^Assurprising as itmay be to some, Christ Church Cathedral, in Dublin (Ireland), was originally established by King Silkbeard around AD1028 —it now belongs to the (Anglican Protestant) Church of Ireland. Silkbeard died in AD1042. Page 1 Silkbeard had political connections, as well as family ties, directly, both by his birth and by his marriages, as well as indirectly, because his blood kin and in-laws themselves were very interconnected with the geopolitical networks of Ireland Viking Age, both inside and outside of Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • AN IRISH ELEVENTH-CENTURY COIN of the SOUTHERN O'neil. I
    AN IRISH ELEVENTH-CENTURY COIN OF THE SOUTHERN O'NEIL. By H. A LEXANDERP ARSONS. INCE the foundation of the British Numismatic Society , much has been done towards a more complete elucidation i;I of the coin ages of these islands, and amongst the notable achievements of the past "vas the discovery, by Major P. Carlyon-Brit ton, of a native issue of Wales.' I have now to place on record a further coinage of the Celtic peoples of these islands, this time of that branch of them which has its home in Ireland. It must have seemed a remarkable fac t to numismatists that the Celtic peoples of Ireland who, in the early medi seval period, had so advanced a civilization that they may be said to have taken the lead in much of the l ea~nin g of Europe, did not institute a met allic monet ary system of their own at the time of the inscribed issues of t heir Anglo-Saxon conte mporaries. Indeed, our early schools of Irish numismatists, commencing with Simon, and ending with Lindsay, boldly but not very discriminatingly, appropriate d an issue of money" to a Donald, King of Monaghan, figure I, of which the following coin is an example :- F IG . .·.- HI BE RNO-DANISH PE NNY OF DUBLIN FORMERLY ATTRIBUTED TO DONALD, KING OF MONAGHAN. H. A. PARSONS. Obverse.- + BYMN Roe + MNEGMI Reverse.- + F,LEMIEN M NO BYEL 1 Th e Saxon, Norman and Plantagenet Coinage of ' Vales, British Numismatic Journal, ii. 2 See British Numismatic J ournal, vi, p.
    [Show full text]
  • April (An T-Aibrean), 2014 Brian Boru 1014
    Volume XXXX, No. 2 • April (An t-Aibrean), 2014 Brian Boru 1014 .........................................................................................................In April, 1014, the Battle of Clontarf route by which raids could be made centralize control, and the Battle of took place. Brian Boru battled Norse and against the provinces of Connacht and Cathair Cuan, allowed some of the Norse Irish armies in north County Dublin, and de- Meath. Both Brian's father and older to remain in their settlement, but they were feated them. Brian then was killed in his tent. brother conducted river-borne raids, in wealthy and now central to trade in the re- That is the non-confusing portion of the which the young Brian would undoubt- gion, with a fleet of great value. Cian, the narrative. The rest of the story makes the edly have participated. This was probably son of his brother Mathgamain's sworn television series, “Game of Thrones,” the root of his appreciation for naval enemy Máel Muad, later became a loyal seemingly a straight-line walk in comparison. forces in his later career. The Hiberno- ally of Brian and served under him in a Norse, or Viking, from the settlement of number of campaigns. The story of Brian Boru of the Limerick influenced Brian, and provided Brian had his eyes set on the High Dalcassians was one of blood, conspiracies, the basis of alliances later in life. alliances, battles, marriages, and family. It Kingship at Tara. The Ui Neills, both was said he drove the Vikings from In 964, Brian's older brother, Mathga- southern and northern, had controlled this Ireland, but that was far from the truth.
    [Show full text]