Bowling for Columbine

Home , Bowling for Columbine, Sicko, Where to Invade Next

Örebro University Department of Humanities, Education and Social Studies English

Critical Literacy through Critical Documentaries - How Bowling for Columbine and Michael Moore hates America can be used to teach argumentative writing and source criticism to students in upper-secondary school in Sweden.

Author: Pontus Schwartz

Degree Project Essay Term 8 Supervisor: Anna Linzie

ABSTRACT

This essay seeks to illustrate how critical literacy and source criticism can be incorporated in argumentative thinking and reasoning in an assignment based on authentic materials constructed for students studying English 6 in Swedish upper-secondary school. The assignment seeks to, grounded in critical literacy theory, increase the students’ source criticism and improve their argumentative thinking and reasoning. These goals are directly connected to the aims presented in the syllabus for the English subject in Swedish upper-secondary school. The essay will state why authentic texts are suitable when teaching critical literacy skills. The essay will also present different theories to critical literacy and conclude that "the four resources model" (Luke & Freebody, 1990) can be considered most suitable for students assigned to produce argumentative texts. The authentic materials chosen for this assignment consist of three themes identified in the critical documentaries Bowling for Columbine (2002), directed by Michael Moore, and Michael Moore hates America (2004), directed by Mike Wilson. The three themes that are selected for the assignment, and nd presented in this essay are: The NRA, The 2 amendment and Is Michael Moore anti-American? The students will get a theme assigned to them and are supposed to, through instructions based on critical literacy theory, develop an argumentative text about their specific theme. Subsequently, the students are supposed to present their argumentative text in front of the class. Additionally, the goals stated in the curriculum for the English subject and the aims from the syllabus for English 6 in Swedish upper-secondary school will be presented and explained in relation to the assignment constructed for this essay and how the assignment will make them to achieve those goals.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION 3

2. BACKGROUND 8 2.1 Four different critical literacy theories 8

2.2 Authentic texts in the language classroom 15

2.3 The assignment in relation to the aims for English 6 in Swedish upper-secondary school 18

3. DISCUSSION 21

3.1 Assignment structure plan 24

3.2 Analysis of the themes 28

3.2.1 The NRA 29

3.2.2 The 2nd amendment 31

3.2.3 Is Michael Moore anti-American? 33

3.3 The expected outcome 36

4. CONCLUSION 37

5. REFERENCES 40

1. INTRODUCTION On the 20th of April 1999, two high school students, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, entered the books of modern American history through an atrocious act of violence. After attending an early morning class, consisting of bowling as an elective for gym class, Harris and Klebold walked into their high school wearing their black trademark trench coats, each carrying a gym bag containing a 20-pound homemade propane bomb inside. Harris and Klebold's plan was to detonate the bombs in the school cafeteria and most-likely deprive approximately 500 students of their life. The survivors from the detonation would be running out from the school, only to face Harris and Klebold standing outside the building with their sharp loaded rifles pointed at them. However, the bombs inside the cafeteria did not go off as planned, so Harris and Klebold had to change their implementation and start the massacre through gunfire. 12 students and one teacher were killed and over 20 people was critically wounded. 900 rounds of ammunition were fired from the weapons that Harris and Klebold carried, both purchased legally at the local K-mart just down the street. At the time “Columbine” occurred, the massacre was called unprecedented, and the deadliest school massacre in American history. It was also the second-most-covered emergent news item of the 90’s, only surpassed by the case of O.J Simpson (Muschert, 2002). Columbine generated intense debates to find someone, or something, to hold accountable for this evil act. One of the outcomes from the tragedy that was internationally highly noticed was Michael Moore’s Academy Award-winning critical documentary: Bowling for Columbine (2002), The subject of gun violence and gun-laws in America is still a highly debated topic to this day.

Depending on who you are asking, there will always be two sides of the same coin when it comes to decisions, laws and regulations. The ability to be able to argue for your opinion is central when speaking your mind trying to convince someone why they should change their attitude towards an issue. Therefore, I have constructed an assignment grounded in the horrific tragedy in Columbine, which I will present in this essay. The goal of this essay is to show how students in upper-secondary school in Sweden studying English 6 can learn the skills of critical literacy and source criticism in argumentative thinking and reasoning when arguing for or against claims presented through authentic material such as documentary films.

My thesis is that these students, through using critical literacy skills, can improve their argumentative thinking and reasoning, as well as their understanding of source criticism and usage of rhetoric, when writing an argumentative text about themes depicted in the critical documentaries Bowling for Columbine and Michael Moore hates America. The goal of this essay has been developed in this custom-made assignment, specially constructed for the critical documentaries presented above, in combination with the use of critical literacy skills for students in English 6. The background needed in order to understand the construction of the assignment will be presented in the Background section. The assignment will serve to reach the overall aim in the English curriculum that states that “I undervisningen ska eleverna få…sätta innehållet i relation till egna erfarenheter och kunskaper. Eleverna ska ges möjlighet att interagera i tal och skrift samt producera talat språk och olika texter…med stöd av olika hjälpmedel och medier. Undervisningen ska dra nytta av omvärlden som en resurs för kontakter, information och lärande samt bidra till att eleverna utvecklar förståelse av hur man söker, värderar, väljer och tillägnar sig innehåll från olika källor för information, kunskaper och upplevelser” [In teaching students should meet…and relate the content to their own experiences and knowledge. Students should be given the opportunity to interact in speech and writing, and to produce spoken language and texts of different kinds...using different aids and media. Teaching should make use of the surrounding world as a resource for contacts, information and learning, and help students develop an understanding of how to search for, evaluate, select and assimilate content from multiple sources of information, knowledge and experiences] (Skolverket [Swedish National Agency for Education], 2011, p.1). These goals from the curriculum can be concretized into more assignment-specific goals connected to the English 6 syllabus. The concretization of those goals which will be presented thoroughly in the Background section.

One could argue that the aims for the assignment designed for this essay can be divided into three interrelated goals in content learning, language learning, and critical analysis, according to an article on how to approach critical literacy by Ryshinka-Pankova (2013). The goal content learning consists of the students’ learning about the themes from the documentaries and also about the tragedy of Columbine. The goal language learning is connected to the English language and how the language is used in the topics and themes the content deals

with. The goal critical analysis is included when the students have to apply the skills of critical literacy in order to write their argumentative text.

The third goal presented above, critical analysis, is also highly connected to the rhetoric used in Bowling for Columbine and Michael Moore hates America. The students should, through this assignment, get knowledge about the modes of persuasion defined in rhetoric as ethos (ethics), logos (logic) and pathos (feelings) (Aufses, Scanlon. Shea & Aufses, 2015). For example, Moore often uses logos in the shape of sarcasm in his claims which empowers the argument since he is not making a claim. The claim becomes empowered because it does not make sense if the viewer cannot identify the message presented through sarcasm. The sarcasm can automatically create a thinking process in the mind of the viewer, since it does not make sense in comparison to Moore’s other claims. This mind trick from Moore forces the viewer to be active. If Moore instead were to present claim after claim, without any sarcasm, the viewer could more easily become inactive and therefore not pay enough attention to the claims presented. One explicit example is when the NRA and the Ku Klux Klan are mentioned in the same context. The narrator states that the Ku Klux Klan became an illegal terrorist group in 1871, the same year that the NRA was founded. The narrator then states that “of course, they had nothing to do with each other and this was just a coincidence” (Moore, 2002). This claim activates people’s logos since it is more logical that the NRA and the Ku Klux Klan are connected rather than not, if mentioned in the same sentence and in relation to the same historical moment.

Another mode of persuasion that Moore uses in Bowling for Columbine is pathos. Moore uses it in terms of music or phone calls to emergency services and often in combination with visuals of people crying or fleeing from Columbine high school. The ethos used in Bowling for Columbine is one of the primary topics discussed in Michael Moore hates America. Wilson (2004) claims that Moore tampers with filmed footage and edits clips and quotes in dishonest ways. Wilsons claim can be concluded when watching Bowling for Columbine in a more analytical way, where you can see that clips from different occasions are merged into looking like they are filmed in one sequence. All these three modes of persuasion are necessary for the students to identify and use when arguing for their position in their argumentative text in the assignment for this essay.

The way the curriculum in Swedish upper-secondary school, GY11, is designed today is to enable an increase in the use of critical literacy approaches and authentic material in the language classroom since it can be argued that such material will enhance the students motivation (Wahlström, 2016; Olin-Scheller & Tengberg, 2014). Wahlström (2016) claims that GY11 is a part of the global standards-based curriculums, where education, and the knowledge it provides, is a part of a concept called “value for money”. This explicitly means that the knowledge provided is weighted against the democratic value it brings the student in his or her role as a democratic civil citizen. Therefore, the Swedish upper-secondary school subjects, not least the English subject, have a role to play when it comes to educate our students to improve themselves into the best version of a citizen of our society.

Although this assignment, exclusively constructed for this essay, is applicable to students studying English 6 and 7 in Swedish upper-secondary school. However, this essay seeks to illustrate how this assignment could be applied in the course English 6. This essay also seeks to illustrate how the aims from the curriculum and syllabus, presented above, will be included in this assignment.

The goal of this assignment is for the students to write and present an argumentative text about a theme, presented in a critical documentary, by using critical literacy skills. In order for the students to be able to do that, they will, before attempting the assignment, watch the critical documentaries Bowling for Columbine and parts of Michael Moore hates America. One reason why only parts of Michael Moore hates America will be presented is mainly due to the time it would take the students to watch two documentaries. Secondly, Michael Moore hates America includes criticism of several other documentaries directed by Michael Moore, more than just Bowling for Columbine. Those parts of Wilson’s counter-documentary will not serve any significant purpose for the assignment in question. The reason why the students will watch these documentaries before writing their argumentative texts is that they will have to analyse claims presented and rhetoric used in Bowling for Columbine and the selected parts from Michael Moore hates America that treat Bowling for Columbine.

The students will be assigned a specific theme from the documentaries and also be instructed if they are on Moore or Wilson’s side of the argument. The reason why the students will not get to choose theme or side is in order to help them, to some extent, to leave their personal beliefs outside the argument. When the assignment is set up in this way, the students will also not be afraid of having the “wrong” opinion in front of their classmates when presenting their argumentative text. In order for the students to acquire more knowledge and information and to build strong arguments about the assigned theme from the documentaries, they will also be allowed to use the internet as a source.

To be able to complete the assignment successfully, the students must also be aware of different rhetorical aspects, such as feelings, values and attitudes, which can be identified when mastering critical literacy. The students should also be able to point out the strong and weak points of both sides’ arguments, using their knowledge of ethos, logos and pathos (Aufses, Scanlon. Shea & Aufses, 2015). The students will subsequently have to select sources critically outside the ones provided by the teacher, to ensure that they will not argue for false claims.

This assignment will hopefully give the students a deeper understanding of the importance of source criticism by using critical literacy skills. The assignment should also provide them with an increased ability to sift through divergent sources and critically analyse whether they are reliable and more importantly – why or why not. The students should also attain an understanding of how to use rhetoric in different context when arguing for, or against, one’s claim.

The Background section will, first, serve as an informative section on how and why critical literacy could and should be used in the language classroom. Secondly, how and why authentic material could be used in the language classroom will be presented. Thirdly, the core content and the goals of the Swedish syllabus for English 6 for this assignment, presented earlier, will be analysed in terms of how critical literacy can be incorporated into that core content and these goals, and especially in relation to the assignment constructed for this essay. The Discussion section will provide explicit examples of scenes from Bowling for Columbine and Michael Moore hates America that can be included in each theme chosen for

the assigned task, as well as a detailed discussion of the way in which the assignment, through a rhetorical analysis of and argumentative writing about those scenes, will allow teachers of English 6 to include the core content of the subject and to work towards the goals outlined in the curriculum. Furthermore, these findings will subsequently be discussed in relation to the goal of this essay in the Conclusion section.

2. BACKGROUND

2.1 Four different critical literacy theories

This section seeks to illustrate the definition of the concept of critical literacy. This section will also present how different theories to critical literacy can be used to acquire a deeper, critical understanding of a text and how to read the intention of the text rather than the content (What is the text trying to tell me? Who is trying to tell me that?) Lastly, this section will present how critical literacy could be used in the language classroom.

It is crucial for teachers to be aware that critical literacy is an approach, rather than a method that is ready to be applied in the classroom (Bergöö & Jönsson, 2012). Instead, of a ready-made methodology, critical literacy is a way of using your literacy, which means that the text you are reading is understood in relation to its rhetorical dimension and the social context. The content is therefore interpreted differently depending on who the reader is. Critical literacy gives the student different possibilities to communicate both visually and verbally and consequently gives the student access to literacy power, defined by Bergöö and Jönsson (2012) as “reading” from a critical literacy point of view. Reading from a critical point of view does not explicitly mean that you are reading a written text since you can equally well “read” film and other media (McLaughlin & DeVoogd, 2004; White & Cooper, 2015). The Swedish National Agency for Education suggests that critical literacy should be applied both to written texts, both print and digital and also to other types of texts, such as photos, video games and film (Bergöö & Jönsson, 2012). The primary sources that are intended to be read, using critical literacy, for the assignment presented in this essay, are the critical documentaries Bowling for Columbine and Michael Moore hates America. These texts will constitute material for the students’ reasoning in argumentative texts, which will be

written, read and presented in front of other students. This way of structuring, writing and presenting is, according to Haria, MacArthur & Edwards Santoro (2010), a way to successfully learn how to work with argumentative texts.

The critical literacy approach seeks to make readers become active and aware of what they read in everyday texts. An active reader is strategic and capable of processing the content of a text from a critical perspective and is therefore aware of the implicit purpose of the message presented in front of them. With this awareness, the reader have the skills to identify that meanings and purposes are grounded in explicit contexts, such as political, social, cultural or historical (Serafini, 2003). Critical literacy is explicitly about knowing the author’s intent and to comprehend it with a critical edge, according to Pearson in McLaughlin & DeVoogd (2001), and through this critical comprehension acquire an understanding of the content and what the text is trying to make you think, believe and do. The Swedish National Agency for Education lists that, in mandatory school, critical literacy should serve students to: “bygga förståelse för ett innehåll med hjälp av språket; kunna tolka och jämföra olika textformer; få en sammanhållen syn på språk, kunskap, identitet och demokrati, kritiskt granska klass, genus, etnicitet och andra rättvise- och maktfrågor; engagera barn/elever i för dem relevanta frågor [build an understanding of the content using the language; acquire an ability to interpret and compare different texts; acquire a cohesive vision on language, knowledge, identity and democracy; critically analyse class, gender, ethnicity, and other justice and power issues; engage students in, for them, relevant matters]” (Skolverket, 2019, my own translation).

Critical literacy and the theories developed for it can be used for different types of contents, such as the critical documentaries in this assignment. The content from the documentaries that will be used in the assignment of this essay can be explained as non-fictional texts. A non-fictional text is not simply a text that seeks to provide information to us, but a text which puts specific demands on us readers to determine what is considered reliable or not (Beers & Probst, 2016). You could think that non-fictional texts do not put any demands on the reader since they most often mean to serve as informative or to state a claim. But, in order to read from a critical literacy point of view, the reader always needs to ask themself: who is speaking? Whose voice and opinion is being expressed? What does the text want to do with

me? (Bergöö & Jönsson, 2012). Beers & Probst (2016) claim that the biggest mistake that readers do when reading a non-fictional text is that they completely rely on the author or the source. When reading Lord of the Rings, we know that it is fiction and that certain historical events, geographical pictures and characters’ perceptions, ideas or actions most likely are made up and are not related to real life. But, as soon as a published text appear on a website, in a short news message on social media, or in the paper, depicting something we are familiar with or can relate to the real world, it often becomes true or trustworthy to us. Someone reading without a critical literacy approach might not interfere with a non-fictional text and the statement it provides. Furthermore, Beers and Probst present several “headlines” that, at a first glimpse, could make sense to someone reading from a non-critical point of view. One example in their book is: “Wolves should be reintroduced into these protected areas.” This headline might not strike anyone as questionable, since you probably know, using your own background knowledge, that wolves are a part of the wildlife in your country, and it sounds like the wolves could benefit from living in certain protected areas. So yes, maybe wolves should be introduced into these selected areas again. Without critically analysing the headline, you are making this conclusion without asking yourself whose voice is not being heard. Beers and Probst use these headlines to support their claim that, in contradiction to what one at first might think, non-fictional texts do put demands on the reader and place a big responsibility on the reader to be aware of biases and claims taken out of context. If students continuously were to use critical literacy as an approach when reading non-fictional texts, they would be aware that the author is “not displaying the truth, but one vision of the truth”, and it is up to the reader to decide whether they should question their own beliefs while determining if the text in front of them is true or not (Beers & Probst, 2016, p.19).

There are different theoretical perspectives on critical literacy, but they are all based on the same relationship, which is between language and power, and the inclusion of one’s own social and cultural experiences (Olin-Scheller & Tengberg, 2017). Lankshear (1994) has, through a three-parted explanatory progression ladder, presented what skills critical literacy consists of and what one must incorporate, in order to read from a critical literacy point of view:

1. Knowing literacy (or various literacies) critically, that is having a critical perspective on literacy/literacies generally. 2. Having a critical/evaluative perspective on particular texts. 3. Having a critical perspective on – that is, being able to make critical readings of – wider social practices, arrangements, relations, allocations, procedures etc. which are mediated by, made possible by and partially sustained through the reading of texts.

(Lankshear, 1994, p.10)

Wallace (2001) explains that Lankshear’s first step includes a wide sociocultural perspective of knowing what critical literacy consists of. The first step can, therefore, be seen as a preparatory step towards the second step, which includes knowing specific linguistic tools in order to manage to make a critical analysis, before subsequently reaching the third step. The third step includes the two first steps, and in addition, demands the user to have a more explicit critical approach to a text and its content. One could argue, through referring to Lankshear’s progression ladder, that a student has acquired the knowledge of using critical literacy when mastering the third and final step, and the skills included, in the ladder. However, this skill is structured and approached in alternative ways, depending on where you teach or go to school. It also depends on which critical literacy theory you decide to work with. However, although these theories differ in some ways, it does not necessarily mean that they represent competing views since they also overlap in many ways, according to White & Cooper (2015). Below, I will present four seminal critical literacy theories: the first one by Rosenblatt (2004), a second one by Gee (2012) a third one by Bernstein (1990), and finally a theory called “the four resources model”, by Luke and Freebody (1990).

According to Rosenblatt (2004), there are two different stances that a reader can take when reading a text: an aesthetic stance and an efferent stance. Readers interpreting a text from an aesthetic stance involve their feelings to what they feel about the message presented in front of them. Reading from an efferent stance would instead mean that they are reading from a more factual point of view. Rosenblatt points out that one does not solely read from an aesthetic or an efferent stance, but rather includes both stances. Reading from both stances will force the reader to, unintentionally, shift from which stance are the most dominant one.

The stances will be incorporated differently depending on how the text affects the reader. These stances serve, what Rosenblatt calls “aspects of consciousness”. In addition to these two stances, there is a third stance. The third stance serves as a mean to understand the author’s claims by using your own background knowledge. The third stance, called the critical stance, creates a relationship between the author and the readers and allows them to achieve a greater understanding of the true purpose of the text. Through the critical stance, the readers can present their own interpretation of the meaning of the text and criticize the way the author presents the intention of the text and therefore be seen as directly connected to a critical literacy theory (Luke & Freebody, 1990). When a student succeed to see “through” a text and read the underlying purpose to critically analyse what the text actually is trying to prove, the student has reached a new “aspect of consciousness”, as Rosenblatt calls it. This new skill pushes the aesthetic and efferent stances aside and one could therefore argue that when a student masters Rosenblatt’s critical stance, the student is capable of using an approach to critical literacy. This capability means that the student is capable of the metacognitive critical thinking that critical literacy demands.

In an article by Olin-Scheller & Tengberg (2017), both Gee’s (2012) and Bernstein’s (1990) theories of critical literacy are presented. They are presented separately, although they relate to each other, and both include aspects that are significant in critical literacy. Gee’s theory consists of an informal and formal discourse. The informal discourse serves as a more personal discourse, and the formal discourse is a more academic discourse. The informal discourse is also referred to as the primary discourse and includes the students’ prior understandings, such as language, experiences, feelings and affinities. The formal discourse is referred to as the secondary discourse. Gee claims that the secondary discourse is highly connected to students’ literacy and other aims that the school seeks to teach its students, such as being open towards alternative ways of thinking and other people’s values and attitudes in different situations (Olin-Scheller & Tengberg, 2017).

In his definition of vertical and horizontal discourses, Bernstein (1990) distinguish different types of language competencies. The vertical discourse takes the form of a coherent and systematically structure. The vertical discourse is applied through analyses and evaluation, which is closely related to reading from a critical perspective. The horizontal discourse is

instead associated with more informal language, with already familiar knowledge as a central part, in comparison to the more systematic and analytic vertical discourse (Bernstein, 1999; Olin-Scheller & Tenberg, 2017). Wallace (2001) claims that Bernstein’s vertical discourse, and the abilities included in it, are learned, rather than acquired. Wallace means that the metalevel awareness that is included in the vertical discourse and thereby also critical literacy, is something that you develop through recurrent assignments in an educational environment. These abilities are not something that you can acquire without any previous experience. In the same paragraph, Wallace also refers to Lankshear (1997) who claims that the capability of “gaining conscious knowledge via explanation, analysis and similar teaching processes” is empowering. Bernstein’s vertical discourse could therefore be seen as a vital part when developing a critical way of thinking (Wallace, 2001, p.219).

The last theory of critical literacy that will be presented in this essay is the four resources model, defined by Luke and Freebody (1990). As the name reveals, this model consists of four different resources, which are developed from a critical literacy perspective. The different resources in the model consist of:

- Code-breaking: How to interpret written and visual language, How does it work? - Meaning makers: How to make meaning from written and visual texts, How do the ideas represented in the text string together? What are the cultural meanings and possible readings that can be constructed from this text? - Text users: How do the users of this written or visual text shape its composition? What do I do with this text, here and now? - Text analysis: How to detect underlying values, What is the text trying to do to me? In whose interests? (Hinrichsen & Coombs, 2013; Victoria State Government, 2018)

These resources focus on the learner, rather than the goals in the syllabus. The four resources model has been adopted on a large scale in literacy education internationally and has also been used to develop learner metacognition, which is an ability directly associated to critical

literacy, according to Hinrichsen & Coombs (2013) and Olin-Scheller & Tenberg (2017). Metacognition facilitates a critical approach and metacognitive processes and can therefore be seen as crucial when it comes to critically interpreting and evaluating different types of texts. Aspects of metacognitive processes can include the ability to draw attention to key elements or passages and know how to read certain texts in order to understand the underlying purpose.

If critical literacy theories are to be included in the language classroom, teachers have a responsibility to implement critical thinking discourses, such as Bernstein’s vertical discourse (1990), Gee’s secondary discourse (2012), Rosenblatt’s critical stance (2004) or the four resources model by Luke and Freebody (1990). To reach the goals of the assignment presented in this essay, students should get the opportunity to develop ”Strategier för källkritiskt förhållningssätt när man lyssnar till och läser framställningar från olika källor och i olika medier” [Strategies for source-critical approaches when listening to and reading communications from different sources and in different media] and ”Hur språk, bilder och ljud används för att påverka till exempel i politiska tal och reklam” [How language, picture and sound are used to express influence in such areas as political debate and advertising] (Skolverket [Swedish National Agency for Education], 2011, p.7). Both goals are presented in the syllabus for English 6 and will be achieved by the students more easily through one of the theories to critical literacy previously presented.

From this four-theories review, we can conclude that, in order to read texts from a critical perspective in their everyday life, students must learn to use these stances/discourses as naturally as they use the non-critical stances/discourses, such as the aesthetic and efferent stances, created by Rosenblatt (McLaughlin & DeVoogd, 2004). A student who reads authentic texts from a critical stance is a powerful democratic citizen, who is aware of injustices and inequality (Olin-Scheller & Tenberg, 2017), about whose voices are represented and whose voices are missing, who gains and who loses when texts are read from a non-critical stance (McLaughlin & DeVoogd, 2004).

The four resources model (Luke & Freebody, 1990) consists of, and works as a combination of, the other theories presented by Gee, Bernstein and Rosenblatt. It combines the secondary

discourse from Gee with the vertical discourse from Bernstein and Rosenblatt’s efferent stance in a way which makes the four resources model provide a complete and overall theory towards critical literacy. The four resources model has also been used to increase metacognitive skills amongst learners, skills that are directly connected to a critical literacy approach. Students should therefore use the four resources model to increase their metacognitive ability and subsequently increase their critical literacy skills. Therefore, this essay will furthermore refer to the four resources model when arguing for how critical literacy can be applied to the analysis of scenes and themes presented in the critical documentaries Bowling for Columbine and Michael Moore hates America, and subsequently when writing an argumentative text.

2.2 Authentic texts in the language classroom

Inspired by McGrath (2002), this section will provide claims why authentic texts and authentic tasks are profitable when teaching language comprehension, especially in a second language.

Authentic texts, or authentic material, is when a source used in the classroom has a different original purpose. A text in a language textbook may for example often originally be constructed in a pedagogical way to make students learn words used within a certain topic. Authentic materials do not have this purpose but might instead provide information regarding a certain topic. However, both types of texts are applicable in the language classroom. One simple rule when using authentic material is to not alter it in a significant manner. If a text is edited too much, important links that make the text cohesive may be lost, making it more difficult for students to comprehend. McGrath furthermore claims that it might be important for teachers to remember that authentic texts originally have a different purpose, but precisely because of that, they can be valuable and suitable texts to include in language teaching. In comparison to a text from a textbook, authentic texts that were written to convey information, feelings or opinions can be exploited from different angles since they, more than often, are both interesting as well as useful. If an authentic text deals with a sensitive or controversial topic, there may be advantages in editing out certain sequences that might be more inappropriate than profitable, but if the text generally is produced to depict a rather

inappropriate topic, there is not much that can be done, according to McGrath. This claim is rather significant to the assignment provided in this essay, since Bowling for Columbine especially, displays and analyses the tragic phenomenon known as school shootings, that, since “Columbine”, has been a rather common feature in America. It is not unusual that schools in America have “active-shooter drills”, where students, in the same way as if there was a fire-drill, must evacuate the school and go to an emergency assembly point (Campbell, 2018, March 17). Bowling for Columbine includes clips of emergency calls where people are crying and also raw footage from the Columbine shooting. Such subjects can seem rather controversial to bring into a classroom since these clips can affect the students in a negative way emotionally. What speaks in favour for the choice of this kind of subject is that it most certainly will generate a reaction amongst the students and good authentic texts will, according to McGrath (2002), provoke a reaction and contain interesting content. Another aspect that speaks in favour for the subject is that, since the students are taking English 6, many of them are over 18 years old and most likely used to violent subjects, especially through visual media.

An authentic text must fulfil several criteria in order to be applicable it in the language classroom. The most essential criterion, which is an indispensable one, is the relevance to the current syllabus for the selected course (McGrath, 2002). The authentic texts used for this essay will be analysed against the Swedish syllabus for English 6 in upper-secondary school, which will be clarified in the subsequent section. Two other criteria that teachers should consider when selecting texts to be used in the classroom is suitability of content (is the content interesting for the students, is the content relevant for the students’ needs, does the content display the type of material the students will come across outside the classroom?) and readability (is the content too easy/difficult for the students, is the vocabulary used relevant, is the structure to complex?) (Nuttall, 1996).

Tornberg (2000) claims that if one seeks to enhance their ability to use and interact within a language, one should get the opportunity to do so in the way the language is spoken outside the classroom. Fiction and roleplay do not serve the same purpose as letting students interact with their own thoughts and values, dreams and wishes, which they will be able to access and apply when using authentic material and real-life situations. Tornberg continues to argue that

language teachers, unlike other subject teachers in school, has the rather unique opportunity to create teaching material, based on the steering documents, from material not produced for teaching. The increasing segregation in Swedish society and educational system could serve as a reason why this opportunity should be valued and taken advantage of in the language classroom. The experiences from different cultures that students carry with them into the classroom should be considered assets, not only for the individual student, but also for the whole class. Tornberg claims that, since a societal transformation is ongoing in Sweden, the importance of including students’ different experiences (i.e. if a student is born in another country than other students) could be one of the most important missions for the language classroom today. (Tornberg, 2000)

However, the goals from the curriculum which seeks to help the students to acquire democratic values, which are a part of GY11 and other so-called standard-based curriculums entail a weak spot, according to Wahlström (2009). She claims that the structure in GY11 make students eager to choose a quick-fix, a shorter and more shallow way of learning, because of the explicit aims listed in the curriculum. Wahlström furthermore claims that this increases the importance of authentic tasks in the classroom in order to ensure that students’ learning and motivation maintain at a high level.

Sacha Berardo (2006) and Carla Kader (2009) claim that a teacher using authentic material should not emphasize what the student is producing, whether it is a written text or an oral argument, but rather focus on what the student is trying to imply. A teacher who listens and acknowledges his or her students’ efforts can hopefully provide the proper guidance needed to achieve greater fluency or language comprehension. Furthermore, Berardo and Kader argue that authentic materials should be used because the students will not encounter any artificial structure of language since the authentic material is not produced to educate originally. A continuously usage of authentic material will prepare the students to understand how language is used outside the safe zone of the classroom.

So why should one include critical documentaries when using authentic texts? Kress (2003) claims that, through the shift from “telling the world to showing the world” (quoted in Ryshinka-Pankova, 2013, p.163), is more important for literacy development nowadays, due

to the increased exposure of visual medias in our everyday life today. Ryshinka-Pankova also claims that critical visual literacies can provide second language learners with useful tools for coping with challenges stumbled upon when learning a language at an advanced level. Furthermore, she also claims that innovative teachers must, rather than should, include visual materials in their teaching. Ryshina-Pankova states that visual materials serve at least two functions in the classroom for foreign language learners. Firstly, visual materials can present a selected cultural theme or selected content including various perspectives without any significant difficulties compared to written texts. Visual materials can therefore easily provide background information through visual and/or audible content. Secondly, visual media can provide an aid when it comes to interpretations. This can of course be attained through a text as well, but visual media could be seen as a tool for students with a lacking ability to interpret a text. In order to learn from visual materials in the language classroom, the students can be informed of the critical literacy theories and the tools (i.e. what questions to ask the text, how to analyse and interpret key phrases and passages) necessary when using it (Ryshina-Pankova, 2013).

2.3 The assignment in relation to the aims for English 6 in Swedish upper-secondary school

This section seeks to illustrate the relevance of the thesis of this essay to the Swedish curriculum for upper-secondary school, GY11, specifically the English subject, and to highlight what opportunities may be included when teachers include critical literacy in language teaching.

The syllabus for English in the national curriculum for upper-secondary school includes a number of aims, but how to reach them is up to each teacher. This opportunity allows every teacher to select their own authentic material, such as the documentaries presented in this essay. The assignment presented in this essay will include several overall aims for the English subject listed in the GY11 with the most central ones stating that that “I undervisningen ska eleverna få…sätta innehållet i relation till egna erfarenheter och kunskaper. Eleverna ska ges möjlighet att interagera i tal och skrift samt producera talat språk och olika texter…med stöd av olika hjälpmedel och medier. Undervisningen ska dra nytta av

omvärlden som en resurs för kontakter, information och lärande samt bidra till att eleverna utvecklar förståelse av hur man söker, värderar, väljer och tillägnar sig innehåll från olika källor för information, kunskaper och upplevelser” [In teaching students should meet…and relate the content to their own experiences and knowledge. Students should be given the opportunity to interact in speech and writing, and to produce spoken language and texts of different kinds...using different aids and media. Teaching should make use of the surrounding world as a resource for contacts, information and learning, and help students develop an understanding of how to search for, evaluate, select and assimilate content from multiple sources of information, knowledge and experiences] (Skolverket [Swedish National Agency for Education], 2011, p.1).

These aims are later concretized in the core content of the English subject and divided into three different categories; Content of communication; Reception and Production and interaction. With its core in the overall aims just presented, the assignment structured for this essay will also cover the core contents in Content of communication depicted as: “[k]onkreta och abstrakta ämnesområden med anknytning till…aktuella ämnesområden; tankar, åsikter, idéer, erfarenheter och känslor; etiska och existenstiella frågor” [[c]oncrete and abstract subject areas related to… current issues; thoughts, opinions, ideas, experiences and feelings; ethical and existential issues] and also “[l]evnadsvillkor, attityder, värderingar, traditioner, samhällsfrågor samt kulturella, historiska, politiska och sociala förhållanden i olika sammanhang och delar av världen där engelska används” [[l]iving conditions, attitudes, values and traditions, as well as social, political and cultural conditions in different contexts and parts of the world where English is used] (Skolverket [Swedish National Agency for Education], 2011, p.7). These goals can be found within the overall theme for the visual materials and also within the assignment designed from those materials.

It can be argued that school shootings are a current issue in the United States, and the 2nd amendment in combination with liberal gun laws does seem to have an impact on the living situation in the country. In addition, Tornberg (2000) has, through her examination of the theoretic curriculum, discovered two discourses in culture and communication, and the opportunities and meaning they provide in the language classroom. Tornberg claims that a polyphonic classroom is a place which can foster democratic values and opinions, if the

classroom treats democratic content. Democratic content can highlight culture and communication in the language classroom, which can provide an exceptional opportunity in the classroom (Tornberg, 2000). Unlike most of the content in one of the standard-based curriculums, GY11, which was rather recently introduced, the democratic mission of the school is something that has been a part of the Swedish curriculum ever since the previous edition from 1994, Lpf94 (Skolverket [Swedish National Agency for Education], 1994). This democratic mission will serve as a significant part of the assignment constructed for this essay, since the assignment foregrounds that the students shall incorporate their own personal and social experiences into their critical and argumentative thinking. These experiences can differ in terms of socio-economic standards, or perhaps regarding experiences from different governments. The incorporation of democratic values, beliefs and opinions is largely what makes this assignment exclusive in terms of using critical literacy since there is no “right” claim to argue for or against for the students. Finding the correct answer as quickly as possible is not the point – instead, the objective of the assignment is to make students ask critical questions throughout their writing process based on argument analysis and argumentation. Therefore, the students can profit from incorporating own experiences, emotions and opinions in the assignment. But, if done so, still manage to keep a critical approach to the subject.

The assignment will also cover the following core content in the Reception section: “[t]alat språk… som är berättande, diskuterande, argumenterande och redogörande, även via film och andra medier” [[s]poken language… which relate, discuss, argue, report and provide descriptions, also via film and other media], “[s]trategier för källkritiskt förhållningssätt när man lyssnar till och läser framställningar från olika källor och i olika medier” [[s]trategies for source-critical approaches when listening to and reading communications from different sources and in different media], ”Strategier för att söka relevant information i…längre sekvenser av talat språk och för att uppfatta perspektiv och underförstådd betydelse” [[s]trategies to search for relevant information in…longer sequences of spoken language and to understand perspectives and implied meaning] and ”[h]ur språk, bilder och ljud används för att påverka till exempel i politiska tal och reklam” [[h]ow language, picture and sound are used to express influence in such areas as political debate and advertising] (Skolverket [Swedish National Agency for Education], 2011, p.7). The authentic material used in this

assignment are of spoken languages, in combination with how language, picture and sound work as enhancers in order to convince the audience, as stated in the three goals above. The students’ strategy on how to use their source criticism is therefore vital when facing such spoken language that is discussing and argumentative.

The core content included in the last section, Production and interaction, is:” …skriftlig produktion… där eleverna argumenterar…resonerar, sammanfattar, kommenterar, värderar och motiverar sina åsikter” [written production…where students argue…reason, summarise, comment on, assess and give reasons for their views] and “[b]earbetning av språk och struktur i egna…skriftliga framställningar. Anpassning till genre, situation och syfte” [[p]rocessing of language and structure in their own…written communications. Adaptation to genre, situation and purpose] (Skolverket [Swedish National Agency for Education], 2011, p.8). These two goals are included in the writing of the argumentative text the students are supposed to produce after all claims and facts are presented to them. In order for the students to produce a critical argumentative text, they must use the four resources model, and be able to argue and motivate how they find claims trustworthy or questionable. The students must also structure and adapt the text in a suitable way, in order for their own claims to be trustworthy.

From this section can we conclude that the assignment constructed for this essay is strongly connected to the aims presented in the steering-documents for students studying English 6 in Swedish upper-secondary school.

3. DISCUSSION

This section will first seek to further present the authentic material used in the assignment constructed for this essay. Secondly, the assignment lesson plan will be presented and also how it is relevant to the syllabus for English 6. Thereafter will the themes of the assignment be presented along with examples and claims from said themes. Lastly, a short conclusion of the possible outcome will conclude this section.

Bowling for Columbine was what made Moore go from David to Goliath, to become the successful and controversial social critic of his own country that he is today. They allowed Moore to make his infamous speech at the Academy Awards ceremony, where he accused George W. Bush, who was President of the United States at the time, of presenting fictitious election results and presenting fictitious facts to send American troops to war. The success Moore got with Bowling for Columbine is also what lead to the making of, for instance: Fahrenheit 9/11 (2004) and Where to Invade Next (2015).

Bowling for Columbine is considered one of the greatest documentaries of the 21th century and has the second highest number of votes of all documentaries on IMDb (Internet Movie Database) (IMDb, 2018). However, it might be questionable if we can be certain that Moore, as a film-maker is trustworthy. There are reasons to question the facts that Moore presents in Bowling for Columbine. For example, a police report after Columbine stated that Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, in fact, did not attend a bowling class the same morning as the shooting (Mattson, 2003); in contradiction to what Moore claimed. Moore also received harsh critique for harassing the President of the National Rifle Association (NRA), Charlton Heston, who had been diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease when Moore was interviewing him. Two years after Bowling for Columbine was released, the counter-documentary Michael Moore hates America (2004), directed by Mike Wilson, was released. In Michael Moore hates America, the more unfamiliar director, Wilson, examines and critiques several of Moore’s productions, and not least, Bowling for Columbine. Hardly surprisingly, considering the title, Wilson uses his documentary as a means to discredit Moore and the way he tampers with arguments and claims and to argue that he, therefore, must hate America. Throughout Michael Moore hates America, Wilson provides claims that either discredit Moore as an individual, or the way he produces his documentaries. The two documentaries are rather alike in the way they are produced: they are shot with a fairly small crew; the director is often displayed in picture, and several interviews with people of different professions or residents in the town relevant for the topic discussed are included to support claims presented.

But as much as the Bowling for Columbine talks about the Columbine school shooting, it also depicts the culture of the American gun laws and the high crime and murder rates that the country fights against. In these subjects, Moore claims that racism is a part of the problem, in

addition to political corruption. Moore explains the problem on how news media report current issues; and how American society takes advantage of the poor. He also explains how he thinks the gun-positive organisation NRA poisons the minds of gun-crazy citizens. Throughout the documentary, Moore compares America to other countries and argues that they do not have the same problem with gun violence that America is having. The ongoing debate about the right to bear a firearm that American citizens have through the 2nd amendment is also one of the topics that Bowling for Columbine handles. The 2nd amendment has been a highly debated topic, especially since “Columbine”, and the debate is perhaps keener than ever today after over 300 reported school shootings in America since 2013, 65 of them in 2017, with the third deadliest since the Columbine shooting occurring in February 2018 (everytownresearch.org; Cuddy, 2018, February 15).

Another theme that Moore implements throughout Bowling for Columbine is the one about the NRA and incorporated in that theme, also Moore’s eager to interrogate the NRA president between 1998 to 2003, Charlton Heston. Heston and the NRA had, according to Moore, arranged an NRA rally in Columbine about a week after the tragedy occurring at Columbine High School. In addition to that, Moore claims that the NRA had once again, only a short time after a devastating shooting, involving two 6-year olds, arranged another pro-gun rally in the same town where the shooting took place. The third theme presented in Bowling for Columbine is the one about Wilson’s claim about Moore being anti-American. Wilson tries, even with the title of his documentary, to prove this. In Bowling for Columbine, Moore does not explicitly present any claims about America that can be seen as directly anti-american. However, one can notice a sarcasm in Moore’s voice throughout almost every interview in Bowling for Columbine. But subsequently, in a clip in Michael Moore hates America, Moore explicitly states that everything he does is because he loves America. Is Moore making such “degrading” claims because America have issues that must be addressed? Perhaps he is not sarcastic, although in sounds like it? Or does he has a profound hate against his own country? In Bowling for Columbine, Moore presents several theories to why Canada does not have the same horrific statistics as America. Theories such as; there are fewer guns in the households of Canada than in America; or that Canada have less immigration than America; or citizens of Canada feel less fear amongst the residents than in America, only to name a few. But after a visit to Canada by Moore in Bowling for Columbine, his theories do not seem to depict the

truth about what separates the countries and therefore invites the viewer, to some extent, to make up their mind about what actually separates the countries. If this is another proof that Moore hates America, or if this is intentional by Moore is not explicitly stated in the documentary, but one could believe that Moore presents these claims with the knowledge about their non-significance just to make an even stronger claim.

3.1 Assignment structure plan

This assignment is structured to span over a five-week period with three 45 minute long lessons each week. In the first three weeks, the first lesson will be constructed as a lecture where the students take notes rather than study on their own. Here is what an overview at the schedule will look like: Lesson 1.1: The teacher presents the assignment, critical literacy and ethos, logos and pathos. Lesson 1.2: Student assignment: come up with a claim using ethos, logos and pathos. Lesson 1.3: Students present their claim in smaller groups. Lesson 2.1: Lecture about critical literacy and source criticism. Lesson 2.2: Student assignment: find examples on how to use critical literacy and source criticism. Lesson 2.3: Students present their examples with the rest of the class. Lesson 3.1: Lecture about argumentative writing. Lesson 3.2: Student assignment: construct a short argumentative text. Lesson 3.3: Students present their short argumentative text in a group-seminar. Lesson 4.1: Presentation of themes and watching Bowling for Columbine and Michael Moore hates America. Lesson 4.2: Watching Bowling for Columbine and Michael Moore hates America. Lesson 4.3: Oral discussion in groups about the themes from Bowling for Columbine and Michael Moore hates America. Lesson 5.1: Students work on their own with their argumentative text. Lesson 5.2: Students work on their own with their argumentative text. Lesson 5.3: Students work on their own with their argumentative text.

Lesson 1.1 - 1.3: First off when presenting a new assignment, it could be suitable to start with presenting what the goal of the assignment, final product, is supposed to be. In this case, an argumentative text for or against on of the themes from the documentaries chosen for the assignment. The teacher should thereafter also explain to the students why they are supposed to construct the argumentative text and how it will lead them towards the goals of the course. After the students have been instructed about what the final product should include and what the goal of the assignment is, the teacher should present how the students are supposed to make their way from the starting point of the assignment, to reaching the final product. The teacher can therefore present the schedule for the assignment, like the one above, and more explicitly explain to the students how each part will take place, and what every single lesson will consist of. A similar elaboration will take place below. The steering document for this assignment is the syllabus for English 6 in Swedish upper-secondary school. The goals in the syllabus, incorporated in this assignment, state that:

”I undervisningen ska eleverna få…sätta innehållet i relation till egna erfarenheter och kunskaper. Eleverna ska ges möjlighet att interagera i tal och skrift samt producera talat språk och olika texter…med stöd av olika hjälpmedel och medier. Undervisningen ska dra nytta av omvärlden som en resurs för kontakter, information och lärande samt bidra till att eleverna utvecklar förståelse av hur man söker, värderar, väljer och tillägnar sig innehåll från olika källor för information, kunskaper och upplevelser” [In teaching students should meet…and relate the content to their own experiences and knowledge. Students should be given the opportunity to interact in speech and writing, and to produce spoken language and texts of different kinds...using different aids and media. Teaching should make use of the surrounding world as a resource for contacts, information and learning, and help students develop an understanding of how to search for, evaluate, select and assimilate content from multiple sources of information, knowledge and experiences] (Skolverket [Swedish National Agency for Education], 2011, p.1)

During the first lesson, ethos, logos and pathos are also supposed to be presented, as a first step towards the final product of the assignment. The reason why these ways of persuasion are

a part of the assignment is because, as mentioned in the Introduction section, Moore often uses ethos, logos and pathos as a way to empower his claims. In order for the students to recognize this, they have to be aware of their existence and how to use them. The students will get an assignment to come up with a short claim about something of their own choice and support it using ethos, logos or pathos. It could for example be that public transportation should be free or that one should only have to work six hours every day instead of eight. To their help, they will have the “Rhetorical triangle” presented in The Allyn & Bacon Guide to Writing (Ramage, Bean & Johnson, 2015). The reason why the students get to choose the topic on their own is because they might have an easier time to come up with a claim about something that they actually have a opinion about. If they are not able to come up with a topic of their own, they are allowed to use the internet as a source to find an interesting topic to have an opinion about. Since the main goal of this short assignment is to learn about ethos, logos and pathos and how to use them, the topic the students choose is not a crucial in order to reach the final goal of the assignment. However, this short assignment is a way for the students experience how to work with content that relate to their own experiences, as presented in the syllabus (Skolverket, 2011). The first weeks’ lessons concludes with a presentation in smaller groups where the students will present their claim in order to share their arguments with their classmates. A student that has focused on ethos might get extended knowledge about how to apply pathos into an argument and vice versa.

Lesson 2.1 - 2.3: During this week, the teacher will start off the first lesson with how one can use the term to “read with and against the grain”, presented in The Allyn & Bacon Guide to Writing (Ramage, Bean & Johnson, 2015). Knowing how to read with and against the grain is a great way of using source criticism in order to understand what the author wants to mediate to the reader. The students will during the second lesson, on their own, find arguments in various sources, for instance in newspapers or internet pages and then try to agree with the author (reading with the grain) or find disproofs (reading against the grain) and oppose them against each other. The second week ends with a presentation from the students where they present the source of their choice and highlight the claims that they found when reading with the grain and the ones they found when reading against the grain.

Lesson 3.1 - 3.3: During the presentation in the first lesson, the teacher is supposed to present the four resources model (Luke & Freebody, 1990) and what it consists of. It will not be necessary for the students to acquire extended knowledge about the term critical literacy and the fact that there are several other theories to using critical literacy. However, it is vital for the goals of the assignment that the students have knowledge about how they can use critical literacy skills through the four resources model. It is also important and that they possess those skills when they are writing their own argumentative text. That is why the students will be taught the four resources model during this week, so they can practice on how to write an argumentative text using these skills. The structure of this week-long assignment follows the same as the assignments completed during the first and second week. The students will have to come up with a subject of their own choice to write their argumentative text about, following the instructions of the Luke and Freebody’s four resources model (1990). This means that the students must acquire a text, from a newspaper or a internet page, perhaps a letter to the editor or maybe a news report to be able to analyse the content. The students are later on supposed to present their short argumentative text in smaller groups during the last lesson to hopefully acquire extended knowledge from their classmates about how one can analyze a text and argue for or against a claim of your choice.

Lesson 4.1 - 4.3: The fourth week of the assignment is where the final product takes off for real. During the first two lessons, the teacher will present and show parts of the two critical documentaries, Bowling for Columbine and Michael Moore hates America, that includes the themes that the students will be assigned. During these two lessons, the teacher is also supposed to inform the students about what Bowling for Columbine, in particular, is about. Despite the title, Bowling for Columbine, the documentary does not exclusively treat the topic of the tragic school shooting, but it also includes several other subjects which Moore associates with the Columbine massacre. Some students may lack knowledge about Michael Moore, Columbine, the documentary, or even about the 2nd amendment, which are all parts of the documentary, and the themes the students are supposed to write their argumentative text about. According to McGrath (2002) and Kelly, Kelly, Offner & Vorland (2002) in order for the assignment to work out as planned, it could be suitable to hand out papers with some plain information about these subjects before starting to watch the documentaries. It is important during this phase, that the teacher provides the information in a rather plain manner

and tries to limit the information to exclusively hard facts. One would not want to give the students any first impressions or vague opinions to follow at this stage. The students should be considered blank canvases, with themselves as the only artists allowed to paint their opinion. However, it could be suitable for the students to be informed of which theme they will be assigned after watching the documentaries. If the teacher reveals the themes and which student is assigned to each theme, before screening the documentaries, the students will probably pay more attention to quotations, claims and visual impressions before, during and after the parts of the documentaries that treat their theme. After watching the documentaries a group discussion will take place during the last lesson. This lesson serves to help the students straighten out some of the question marks they might have from watching Bowling for Columbine and Michael Moore hates America. The discussion is not supposed to head any specific direction, rather than to put more information and perhaps different opinions in the students’ minds from their classmates point of view.

Lesson 5.1 - 5.3: The fifth and last week of the assignment is where the students have their primary time to create their argumentative text. The earlier stages of the assignment are supposed to help them throughout this stage of the creation and development. When the students have composed their own argumentative text, they are supposed to present it in front of the class. The reason why they are supposed to present the text is because it will serve as a final opportunity for them to learn about how one might argue for something. If the students only were to submit their text to the teacher without any presentation, a whole lot of powerful insights and arguments from the class would be lost. During the presentation, the students do not have to be afraid of speaking their minds since they have been assigned to the specific theme, and the teacher should stress that the student who is presenting their arguments does not have to support their claims. This will hopefully lead to that the students will feel more comfortable about presenting their argumentative text in front of the class, since it is not “them” standing up their argumenting for their claim.

3.2 Analysis of the themes

This section will present the three different themes that are to be assigned to the students for this assignment. This section will also present claims that can be used for each theme when

writing an argumentative text. In the assignment, the students will simply get directions if they are supposed to be for or against Moore’s claims in relation to the chosen theme from the documentaries. The themes are: The NRA, The 2nd amendment, and Is Michael Moore anti-American?

3.2.1 The NRA

The National Rifle Association (NRA) and their former President, Charlton Heston, play a rather big and significant part in Bowling for Columbine. Moore claims that the NRA, on two separate occasions, have had pro-gun rally speeches within days in the same towns where school shootings have taken place. Moore presents this claim through showing scenes from the Columbine massacre and subsequently interviews where students who have been fleeing for their lives are crying and describing to the camera what they have seen and experienced during the massacre. A guitar is playing a slow electronic riff throughout the scenes to increase the pathos of the viewer. In the next scene, we see Charlton Heston in a speaking chair, holding a rifle above his head chanting: “From my cold, dead hands!”, receiving cheers and applause from the crowd in front of him, who supposedly are NRA supporters. In addition, fragments from Heston’s speech at Denver, only 10 days after the Columbine massacre are displayed. The speech concerns Americans’ right to have freedom, to unite the country and to defeat evil. In the middle of Heston’s arguments another speech is displayed: A father who has lost his son in Columbine, speaks in front of a huge crowd as part of a demonstration against guns. The father states that “a Tech-9, semi-automatic, 30 bullet weapon, like that, that killed my son – is not used to kill deer. It has no useful purpose” (Moore, 2002). Moore sets these two speeches against each other, for the viewer to determine which one makes the most sense. In Michael Moore hates America, the First Vice President of the NRA, Sandra Froman, claims that Moore had interspersed footage from two different NRA speeches, making it look as though the speeches took place at the same time. Froman claims that editing these two speeches and replacing the flow of the speech, is a way to mislead the audience to believe that Charles Heston does not care about the victims of Columbine. Froman continues to state that the part where Heston holds the rifle above his head is from a speech in 2000, almost a year after the Columbine massacre. At a second look at Bowling for Columbine, you can clearly see that Heston wears different ties in the clips, which makes it obvious that the clips are not taken from one single speech given on one

single occasion. In the same corresponding scene in Michael Moore hates America, you can see Moore claiming during a lecture that “everything in the movie is true, everything was edited in an honest fashion” (Wilson, 2004).

Another section in Bowling for Columbine displays the history of the 2nd amendment, but also the history of the NRA. It is displayed through a short cartoon, where the narrator is speaking in what appears to be a southern accent - if this is an active choice by Moore is not discussed further. However, in my experience, people who live in the southern states are often depicted as hillbillies and therefore seen as more conservative and less intelligent. The narrator points out that in 1871, the Ku Klux Klan became an illegal terrorist organisation and in the same year, the NRA was formed. In the same sequence, the narrator says: “of course, they had nothing to do with each other and this was just a coincidence. One group legally promoted responsible gun ownership; the other shot and lynched black people” (Moore, 2002). However, if the narrator is speaking with irony or not is not explicitly certain, since he does not alter his voice or make any further claims about the NRA and the Ku Klux Klan being somehow interrelated. According to an attorney who is interviewed in Michael Moore hates America, the NRA was founded by two union officers from New York, after the Civil War, and not by the Confederate clan side. In another interview, with the NRA’s First Vice President Sandra Froman, she states that she cannot understand why Moore would mention the NRA and the Ku Klux Klan in the same sentence if they had nothing to do with each other. Froman furthermore claims that Moore must be implying that the NRA and the Ku Klux Klan believe in the same things, which, according to her, could not be farther from the truth. “The NRA serves to protect the constitution, the bill of rights, and especially, the 2nd amendment”, states Froman. (Wilson, 2004)

At the end of Bowling for Columbine, Moore gets an interview with Heston, who was president for the NRA at the time, in Heston’s home. When the interview starts, Moore does not reveal the true purpose of his visit and he and Heston seem to be on the same page, laughing and enjoying the interview. After a while, Moore alters his intent and approach towards Heston and the mood between the two becomes quickly more intense. Moore asks questions to Heston which he cannot answer and subsequently Heston flees the scene after not being able to answer Moore’s questions. A few years later, Moore received harsh critique

for harassing Heston, who had been diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease when Moore was interviewing him. Whether Moore knew this or not is unknown, but if he did, Moore surely did not show any human respect towards Heston, who had been diagnosed with such serious disease. In Michael Moore hates America, several people, including Wilson himself, claims that Moore often acquires facts and presents claims in an unethical way. If Moore did know about Heston’s condition, would Heston’s inability of arguing be less valuable to the discussion about the NRA’s pro-gun rally? Or does it not matter in what way a director of a critical documentary acquires evidence, as long as the end justifies the means?

3.2.2 The 2nd amendment

One could argue that Bowling for Columbine deals with the 2nd amendment throughout the whole documentary. However, there are some sections that treat this liberal American right explicitly. The 2nd amendment was introduced in 1791, and serves to protect the rights of individuals to possess and bear arms for traditionally lawful purposes within the home (Casenote Legal Briefs, 2017). In the first scene of Bowling for Columbine, Moore enters a bank that has an offer where you get a free gun when opening an account. One of the employees at the bank states that they are a bank and a licensed firearm dealer and keep at least 500 firearms in their vault at all times. Moore signs some documents and is handed a firearm. “Wow, sweet”, exclaims Moore as he aims the rifle around, looking satisfied as he is getting compliments on the rifle from one of the employees of the bank. Suddenly, Moore stops pointing around with the rifle, totally changing his mood and body language, asking the employees: “Hey, here’s my first question: do you think it’s a little dangerous handing out guns at a bank?” with a sarcastic smirk on his face. In the next scene, Moore parades triumphantly out of the bank with the rifle on his shoulder, looking like a happy child. “Uh, oh. That’s bad”, says one of the employees of the bank, when being interviewed about what happened, in Michael Moore hates America. According to the employee, Moore had called the bank in advance to make sure that he would receive a gun the same day that he visited the bank. She also claims that the bank only had one gun in their vault that day, and that was the one Moore had ordered in advance. Moore made it look like you could stroll into the bank, open an account, and be handed a gun, when you instead had to pass a background check which would take several weeks to get registered, according to the employees of the bank. The employees claim that some of the sequences from Moore’s visit might be factual, and

some of them might not, but what Moore depicts in Bowling for Columbine is a simplified truth and that no one had an opportunity to present a counter-claim about what really happened.

Later in the documentary, Moore is visiting the paramilitary organization Michigan Militia. The members who Moore interviews are out in the woods, shooting with their rifles at bowling pins, which they claim are used since they represent the shape of a human body. Without even hearing a question from Moore, you get to see one of the member claiming that:

This (probably about arming yourself and knowing how to operate a firearm) is an American tradition. It is an American responsibility to be armed. If you’re not armed – you’re not responsible. Who’s gonna defend your kids? The cops? The federal government? It’s your job to defend you and yours. If you don’t do it, you’re in dereliction of duty, as an American. (Moore, 2002)

Another member of the Michigan Militia claims that she carries a gun since she is a female and therefore should be able to protect herself by the best means necessary, which indirectly means to carry a gun. Furthermore, she also asks Moore: “When a criminal break into your house, who’s the first person you’re gonna call? Most people would call the police because they have guns. Cut out the middle man…If you’re not gonna protect your family – who is?” The woman makes these claims as she has her daughter, who does not seem to be older than 3 years old in her arms in front of her, making it obvious for the viewer who she intends to protect on such an occasion. One could argue that these Michigan Militia members do not represent the average American citizen; however, recent research shows that 30% of the adults in America currently own a gun (Pew Research Center, 2017), and that there are 89 civilian firearms per 100 residents in the United States (Small Arms Survey, 2011). What Moore is trying to convey by visiting the Michigan Militia is rather obvious when he, in addition to the visual pictures that show a group of “civilian militaries”, shooting at bowling pins in the woods, adds claims about former members of the organization blowing up buildings, killing 168 people in 1995. It is obvious that Moore has included this clip in his

documentary to depict how absurd the American gun laws have affected the people in a negative way. However, I am not sure the claims described above, about criminality and individual responsibility, work in Moore’s favour.

Later in Bowling for Columbine, Moore also states that Canada does not have anywhere near the same murder-rate as America, but that he, as an American, can go to Canada and purchase a firearm as easily as in the United States. Moore also claims that Canada is “one gun-loving, gun-toting, gun-crazy country”, with roughly 7 million guns nationwide. I believe that Moore contradicts himself with this claim and substantially, the overall claim in Bowling for Columbine of convincing the viewer that the reason why America has a significant high homicide rate, is because of the 2nd amendment.

Michael Moore hates America does not provide any explicit response for Moore’s visit to Michigan Militia, but Wilson does, however, claim that statistics from Interpol show that Canada’s crime rate is twice that of the United States. However, statistics show that in comparison to the 89 firearms per 100 citizens in America, Canada has 31 per 100 citizens. In addition to those numbers, in 2000, two years before Bowling for Columbine was released and four years before Michael Moore hates America was released, Canada had a national rate of 1.8 homicides per 1000,000 population - America had a 5.5 rate in the same number of citizens (Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, 2001). This means that either does Wilson present false facts about the crime rates in Canada and the United States or else is Interpol presenting false facts. My interpretation of this is that I find it rather unlikely that Interpol would present facts that are not accurate.

3.2.3 Is Michael Moore anti-American?

This last theme does not really include specific scenes from both documentaries, but rather several claims that Moore makes in Bowling for Columbine and how Wilson criticizes Moore’s claims and also discredits Moore as a person, in Michael Moore hates America. In the very first scene of Bowling for Columbine, Moore is narrating as we hear “The battle hymn of the republic” in the background:

It was the morning of April 20th, 1999, and it was pretty much like any other morning in America. The farmer did his chores, the milkman did his deliveries, the president bombed another country whose name we couldn’t pronounce…and out in a little town in Colorado, two boys went bowling at six in the morning. Yes, it was a typical day in the United States. (Moore, 2002)

According to Moore, the United States dropped more bombs than ever before on Syria on the same day that the Columbine school shooting took place. The United States and NATO bombed Syria due to the Kosovo war that took place during 1999. Moore claims that the American government did this because they knew that they would get away with it since all media would report from Columbine, instead of a massive bombing of Syria that very same day.

Although Bowling for Columbine mainly consists of claims and arguments about guns, gun control laws and the 2nd amendment, Moore also includes arguments that are directly pointed against the government and how American society is constructed differently from, for example, Canada. In the scenes from Bowling for Columbine where Moore goes to Canada, he visits a hospital. A man walks out from the hospital with stitches all over his face, looking like he has had a rather serious accident. Moore asks the man how much he had to pay for the treatment, and the man answers that he did not have to pay anything for it since it is covered by his hospital insurance. In another scene, where Moore tries to prove a point that no one in Canada locks their doors, Moore opens the doors to several homes in order to verify this claim. In one of the homes, Moore stumbles across a resident, apologizes to him, and thereafter starts a conversation. When Moore is about to end the conversation and walk away, the last words he says to the resident is: “Thanks for not shooting me” (Moore, 2002). When Moore says this, he makes the powerful statement that if you were to enter someone’s house in America, you would get shot immediately. Wilson does the same thing with the door-knocking in Michael Moore hates America, to prove Moore wrong. It turns out that out of five doors, only one was open. Whether this was by chance or not is hard to be ascertained of.

The Columbine massacre is not the only school shooting that is depicted in Bowling for Columbine, since it also includes the story of a tragic accident where a 6-year-old boy shot a girl of the same age. Moore explains that the boy’s single mother was a part of something called the welfare-to-work program. The boys mother attained the program to work off the welfare that the state had given her. Because of the fact that she had to work two jobs every day, the boy’s mother was rarely home to watch her son, and that led to the boy bringing a gun to preschool, accidentally shooting another child. Moore presents all of this since he is arguing that the system is taking advantage of the poor and unemployed, increasing the level of inequality in American society.

Bowling for Columbine is also not the only critical documentary by Moore depicting and arguing about how and what the American government is doing “against” its own people. In addition, there is also Where to Invade Next (2015), where different countries are compared to America regarding on how they deal with social and economic issues, Sicko (2007), about American health-care, and Capitalism: A Love Story (2009), where Moore examines the social and public costs from corporate interest in making the largest profit possible.

In the first scenes of Michael Moore hates America, you get to see a clip from a lecture with Moore where he, in contradiction to what Wilson claims, states that: “Everything I do is because I love America”. This clip is played over and over again, interspersed with other short clips of Moore in interviews, saying that: “Guns don’t kill people, Americans kill people” and “The worst thing you can do, [is] to become like America”. A few minutes into Michael Moore hates America, the author David Hardy, who wrote the book Michael Moore Is a Big Fat Stupid White Man (2004), the title probably taken from one of Moore’s books, Stupid White Men (2001), has his say on what he thinks of Moore. Hardy claims that Moore possesses a great many characteristics which are directly connected to the symptoms of a narcissistic personality disorder. Hardy further explains that these symptoms involve an inner self-hate which is covered by an enormous ego. This is displayed with scenes from an interview where Moore calls himself “inappropriate”, followed by: “I’m the biggest selling author in America, I’ve got the biggest selling watched documentary of all time”.

Subsequently, Wilson is trying through large parts of Michael Moore hates America to get an interview with Moore. He calls Moore’s office multiple times and he even tries to get the interview by going to the news media, calling out to Moore. But Wilson never gets the interview. Perhaps that is the strongest statement that Wilson could get from Moore? Could Moore possibly be afraid of Wilson and what he might ask or what evidence he might have against him? Maybe an interview would make it obvious that Moore does hate America?

3.3 The expected outcome

The three themes that have been presented in this section are what the students will work from when producing their argumentative text. The variety of points, statements and ideas that this section has provided are just examples of what these themes include. The students working with the assignment might find passages that are not presented here.

Both documentaries have claims that in some ways are rather ambiguous or concealed and might be hard for student in upper-secondary school to detect and subsequently question whether they are reliable or not. However, one can argue that, if the students are to use the four resources model (Luke & Freebody, 1990) and to continuously remind themselves of keep questioning the statements that are made, both by Moore and Wilson, they have a significantly bigger chance of detecting these “false” claims.

Subsequently, there might be additional difficulties for those students who are to argue for the 2nd amendment and a more liberal gun control law. However, although Bowling for Columbine seeks to convince its viewers of how bad the number of guns available nationwide in America are, I find that Bowling for Columbine presents more claims for a more liberal gun possession law than Michael Moore hates America does.

In addition, I find the relation between the themes of this assignment and the aims, presented in the syllabus for English 6, for this assignment, strongly connected to each other. Each theme discusses and treats several aims from the syllabus and will therefore contribute to arguments that include democracy, rhetorical modes of persuasion, the students’ experiences and the ability to be source-critical. As a teacher, one should through this assignment, expect

highly motivated students who will cover multiple aims from the syllabus, through using multiple factors that will lead to prosperous learning in the language classroom, according to previous research.

4. CONCLUSION

The goal of this essay was to show how students in upper-secondary school in Sweden studying English 6 can learn critical literacy skills and source criticism skills in argumentative thinking and reasoning when arguing for or against claims presented through authentic material such as documentary films. That goal was formulated in order to achieve the overall aim from the Swedish curriculum for the English subject: “I undervisningen ska eleverna få…sätta innehållet i relation till egna erfarenheter och kunskaper. Eleverna ska ges möjlighet att interagera i tal och skrift samt producera talat språk och olika texter…med stöd av olika hjälpmedel och medier. Undervisningen ska dra nytta av omvärlden som en resurs för kontakter, information och lärande samt bidra till att eleverna utvecklar förståelse av hur man söker, värderar, väljer och tillägnar sig innehåll från olika källor för information, kunskaper och upplevelser” [In teaching students should meet…and relate the content to their own experiences and knowledge. Students should be given the opportunity to interact in speech and writing, and to produce spoken language and texts of different kinds...using different aids and media. Teaching should make use of the surrounding world as a resource for contacts, information and learning, and help students develop an understanding of how to search for, evaluate, select and assimilate content from multiple sources of information, knowledge and experiences] (Skolverket [Swedish National Agency for Education], 2011, p.1), and subsequently concretized to explicit goals presented for the course English 6.

This essay’s thesis is that students, studying English 6, can achieve the goal presented above through an assignment based on authentic materials, which include the usage of a theory to critical literacy to write an argumentative text about themes depicted in the critical documentaries Bowling for Columbine and Michael Moore hates America. The argumentative text will subsequently be presented and discussed in class.

I have stated that both directors of the documentaries, Moore (Bowling for Columbine) and Wilson (Michael Moore hates America), are making claims that can be questioned and analysed from a critical literacy point of view. I have also argued that the theory that would be most suitable for students to use throughout this assignment would be the four resources model, by Luke & Freebody (1990). The four resources model can be used to increase learners’ metacognitive skills, which have been concluded to be directly connected to critical literacy (Hinrichsen & Coombs, 2013; Olin-Scheller & Tenberg, 2017; Wallace, 2001). The essay has also argued that the students for whom this assignment is intended for should get knowledge about the rhetorical modes of persuasion, ethos, logos and pathos, in order to detect the rhetorical strategies used in the documentaries and point out how they can improve, or in some cases disprove, a claim or argument.

Three themes and also specific sequences and claims from both documentaries have been presented to highlight how diverse the documentaries and the claims made by Moore and Wilson are. I believe that students without critical literacy skills only can produce argumentative texts based on their pathos. Without knowing what questions to ask, you would just probably present a text that is based on what the claims made you feel, not what they made you think. Without the critical ability to “read the text”, students would most likely present a biased text, based on their own values and beliefs and subsequently also be more naive to information presented to them. In today’s society, with instant access to all sorts of internet pages with information about everything that one could possibly think of, students must learn how to be source-critical. The democratic mission that rests upon the Swedish school system must incorporate source criticism in order to increase the general social and cultural knowledge in our country. I believe that this sort of assignment, with authentic materials, about an interesting and up-to-date topic, is one of the right ways to go.

One of the outcomes that one, as a teacher, can expect from this assignment is that the students most likely will find it easier to argue against the NRA, the 2nd amendment and that Moore is not anti-American. The students that will be assigned to argue against Moore might initially have a harder time to find arguments that speak in favour of Wilson and his claims. However, I find these two documentaries on a similar level when it comes to arguments and claims that do not hold up. However, the reason why I anticipate this assignment to be

somewhat harder for the students arguing against Moore is that we live in Sweden. The thought of living in a country where it is legal to carry a gun at all times is so far from the everyday life we live here, and therefore it might be hard for some students to see the positive parts of making guns legal for private use. However, this opinion might solely be founded based on my non-existing experiences from living in another country. Students with greater experience than me might not see the same obstacles in arguing against Moore’s claims as I do. In addition, some students, even without experience from other countries, might find it weird that Sweden does not allow guns. Some students might think that it should be indisputable that we are allowed to protect ourselves with every means necessary. It does not automatically have to lead to everybody shooting each other, since it, obviously, is up to each person to decide whether to shoot someone or not. With or without gun control laws.

I personally remember watching the surveillance tapes from Columbine high school on YouTube when I was about 13 or 14 years old. A few minutes into the video, I understood that this was not a tasteless recreation of a fictional incident. I could not believe that the surreal event I was watching had actually happened in a high school and executed by students the same age as the victims. Throughout the whole video, I remember being in shock and almost enslaved by the horrific tragedy I was watching. After watching the tape, I started searching for information about why and how this could have happened. Today, almost 15 years later, I still feel a “connection” to the topic of the Columbine massacre and I strongly believe that this topic has been an important part in the development of my own critical literacy.

I am hoping that if teachers apply this kind of assignment and the authentic materials presented in this essay, in their language classroom, their students will find it as interesting and important a subject as I do.

5. REFERENCES

Aufses, R.; Scanlon, L.; Hausmann Shea, R.& Aufses, K. (2015). Conversations in American literature: Language, rhetoric, culture. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s. Beers, K. & Probst, R. (2016). Reading Nonfiction: Notice & Note Stances, Signposts, and Strategies. Portsmouth: Heinemann. Berardo, S. (2006). The Use of Authentic Materials in the Teaching of Reading. The Reading Matrix, 6(2), 60-68. Bergöö, K. & Jönsson, K. (2012). Glädjen i att förstå: Språk- och textarbete med barn. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Bernstein, B. (1990). Class, Codes, Control. Volume IV. The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge. Bernstein, B. (1999). Vertical and Horizontal Discourse: An Essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 157-173. Campbell, A. (2018, March 17). After Parkland, a push for more school shooting drills: How “active shooter” drills became normal for a generation of American schoolchildren. Vox Media. Accessed 2018-05-20 from https://www.vox.com/policy-andpolitics/2018/2/16/17016382/school-shooting-drills-t raining Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics. (2001). Canadian Crime Statistics 2001. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. Casenote Legal Briefs. (2017). Casenote Legal Briefs for Constitutional Law Keyed to Chemerinsky. New York: Aspen Publishers. Cuddy, A. (2018, February 15). America’s History of School Shootings. Euronews. Accessed 2018-05-03 from http://www.euronews.com/2018/02/15/america-s-history-ofschool-shootings. Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund. (2018). 312 School Shootings in America Since 2013. Accessed 2018-05-03 from https://everytownresearch.org/school-shootings/. Freebody, P. & Luke, A. (1990). “Literacies” programs: Debates and demands in cultural context. Australian Journal of TESOL, 5(7), 7-16. Gee, J. (2012). Social Linguistics and Literacies. Ideology in Discourse. London: Routledge.

Haria, P.; MacArthur, C. & Edwards Santoro, L. (2010). The Effects of Teaching a TextStructure Based Reading Comprehension Strategy on Struggling Fifth Grade Students’ Ability to Summarize and Analyze Written Arguments. Hinrichsen, J. & Coombs, A. (2013). The five resources of critical literacy: a framework for curriculum integration. Research in Learning Technology, 21(21334). doi:10.3402/rlt.v21.21334 Internet Movie Database. (2018). Most Voted Documentary Titles. Accessed 2018-05-25 from https://www.imdb.com/search/title?genres=documentary&sort=num_votes Kader, C. (2009). Teaching Reading in the Foreign Language Classroom. VIDYA, 28(1), 105- 112. Kelly, C.; Kelly, L.; Offner, M. & Vorland, B. (2002). Effective Ways to Use Authentic Materials with ESL/EFL Students. The Internet TESL Journal, 8(11). Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge. Lankshear, C. (1994) Critical Literacy (Occasional paper no. 3). Canberra: Australian Curriculum Studies Association. Lankshear, C. (1997). Changing literacies (Changing education). Buckingham: Open University Press. Mattson, K. (2003). The Perils of Michael Moore: Political criticism in an age of entertainment. Social Science Premium Collection 50(2), 75-80. McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University. McLaughlin, M. & DeVoogd, G. (2004). Critical Literacy as Comprehension: Expanding Reader Response. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(1), 52-62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.48.1.5 Moore, M. (2002). Bowling for Columbine. United States: Alliance Atlantis Communications. Muschert, G. (2002). Media and Massacre: The Social Construction of the Columbine Story (Doctoral thesis, University of Colorado, Department of Sociology). Denver: University of Colorado. Nuttall, C. (1996). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language (2nd edition). Oxford: Heinemann.

Olin-Scheller, C. & Tengberg, M. (2014). Critical Reading of Argumentative Texts. Effects of an Intervention Study in 9th grade, presented at ECER 2014, The Past, the Present and the Future of Educational Research, Porto 2014. Olin-Scheller, C. & Tengberg, M. (2017). Teaching and learning critical literacy at secondary school: the importance of metacognition. Language and Education, 31(5), 418-431. Pew Research Center. (2017). America’s Complex Relationship with Guns. An in-depth look at the attitudes and experiences of U.S. adults. Washington: Pew Research Center. Rosenblatt, L. (2004). The transactional theory of reading and writing. In R. Ruddell & N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (p. 1363–1398). Newark: International Reading Association. Ryshinka-Pankova, M. (2013). Understanding “Green Germany” through Images and Film: A Critical Literacy Approach. A Journal of the American Association of Teachers of German, 46(2), 163-184. Serafini, F. (2003). Informing our practice: Modernist, transactional, and critical perspectives on children's literature and reading instruction. Reading Online, 6(6). Skolverket, The Swedish National Agency for Education (1994). Läroplan för de frivilliga skolformerna, Lpf94. Gymnasieskolan, gymnasiesärskolan, den kommunala vuxenutbildningen, statens skolor för vuxna och vuxenutbildningen för utvecklingsstörda (Curricula for the Independent School Forms, Lpf94. Compulsory School, Compulsory School for Students with Learning Disabilities, Municipal Adult Education, State Schools for Adults and Adult Education for Development-impaired Students). Stockholm: Skolverket. Skolverket, The Swedish National Agency for Education (2011). Läroplan för gymnasieskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet 2011 (Curricula for Compulsory School, Pre-School and After-school Activities 2011). Stockholm: Skolverket. Skolverket. (2019). ”Critical literacy” synliggör maktrelationer och motiverar. Accessed 2019-02-25 from https://www.skolverket.se/skolutveckling/forskning-och-utvarderingar/forskning/criti cal-literacy-synliggor-maktrelationer-och-motiverar Small Arms Survey. (2011). Research Notes: Armed Actors, Nr. 9, 2011.

Tornberg, U. (2000). Om språkundervisning i mellanrummet – och talet om ”kommunikation” och ”kultur” i kursplaner och läromedel från 1962 till 2000. Uppsala: Uppsala universitet. Tornberg, U. (2009). Språkdidaktik. Malmö: Gleerups. Victoria State Government. (2018). The Four Resources Model for Reading and Viewing. Accessed 2018-05-15 from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/teachers/teachingresources/discipline/engli sh/literacy/readingviewing/Pages/fourres.aspx Wahlström, N. (2009) Mellan leverans och utbildning: om lärande i en mål- och resultatstyrd skola. Göteborg: Daidalos. Wahlström, N. (2016). Läroplansteori och didaktik. Malmö: Gleerups. Wallace, C. (2001). Critical Literacy in the Second Language Classroom: Power and Control. In B. Comber & A. Simpson (Eds.), Negotiating Critical Literacies in Classrooms (p. 209-228). London: Routledge. White, R. & Cooper, K. (2015). Democracy and Its Discontents: Critical Literacy across Global Contexts. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Wilson, M. (2004) Michael Moore hates America. United States: HCW Films.