Katastar MHE U Srbiji
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Republic of Serbia Ipard Programme for 2014-2020
EN ANNEX Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Republic of Serbia REPUBLIC OF SERBIA IPARD PROGRAMME FOR 2014-2020 27th June 2019 1 List of Abbreviations AI - Artificial Insemination APSFR - Areas with Potential Significant Flood Risk APV - The Autonomous Province of Vojvodina ASRoS - Agricultural Strategy of the Republic of Serbia AWU - Annual work unit CAO - Competent Accrediting Officer CAP - Common Agricultural Policy CARDS - Community Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and Stabilisation CAS - Country Assistance Strategy CBC - Cross border cooperation CEFTA - Central European Free Trade Agreement CGAP - Code of Good Agricultural Practices CHP - Combined Heat and Power CSF - Classical swine fever CSP - Country Strategy Paper DAP - Directorate for Agrarian Payment DNRL - Directorate for National Reference Laboratories DREPR - Danube River Enterprise Pollution Reduction DTD - Dunav-Tisa-Dunav Channel EAR - European Agency for Reconstruction EC - European Commission EEC - European Economic Community EU - European Union EUROP grid - Method of carcass classification F&V - Fruits and Vegetables FADN - Farm Accountancy Data Network FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization FAVS - Area of forest available for wood supply FOWL - Forest and other wooded land FVO - Food Veterinary Office FWA - Framework Agreement FWC - Framework Contract GAEC - Good agriculture and environmental condition GAP - Gross Agricultural Production GDP - Gross Domestic Product GEF - Global Environment Facility GEF - Global Environment Facility GES -
Ekonomsko Osnaživanje Žena Na Selu Primeri Dobre Prakse
Ekonomsko osnaživanje žena na selu Primeri dobre prakse Beograd, avgust 2019. BEOGRADSKE NADBISKUPIJE Izdavač: Caritas Beogradske nadbiskupije Višegradska 23, 11000 Beograd +381 11 404 6941 [email protected] Katalog pripremili: Prof. Bruna Marđonović-Simonović Dr Miloje Veljić Caritas Beogradske nadbiskupije Fotografije: Nikola Miljković Dizajn i priprema za štampu: Srđan Đurđević Štampa: Caritas Valjevo Tiraž: 1000 komada Beograd, avgust 2019. Sadržaj: 4 Predgovor 6 Opšte informacije o projektu 15 Opština Aleksinac 29 Opština Boljevac 41 Opština Knjaževac 53 Opština Ražanj 64 Partneri 3 Predgovor 4 Ekonomsko osnaživanje žena na selu | Primeri dobre prakse vaj katalog je rezultat projekta „Socijalno i eko- Od 240 žena koje su prošle obuku u okviru Carita- nomsko osnaživanje žena u ruralnim oblastima sovog Projekta, 53 žene su se prijavile na konkurs za Ojugoistočne Srbije“, koji je Caritas Beogradske dodelu bespovratnih sredstava, od kojih je 40 dobilo nadbiskupije implementirao u saradnji sa Caritasom grantove u vidu opreme/materijala za unapređenje ili Slovenije i opštinama Aleksinac, Boljevac, Knjaževac pokretanje porodičnog biznisa. i Ražanj, uz finansijsku podršku Ministarstva spoljnih U katalogu predstavljamo pozitivne primere jednog poslova Slovenije. broja žena iz sve četiri opštine, sa željom da budu Žene iz ruralnih sredina se suočavaju s mnogim iza- podstrek i primer svim ženama koje imaju istu želju i zovima, bilo da su u procesu započinjanja ili unapre- motiv da samostalno započnu ili unaprede svoj poro- -
Opština Prokuplje Profil Zajednice
Opština Prokuplje Profil zajednice Lista tabela .........................................................................................................................................3 1 Uvod ...........................................................................................................................................5 2 Osnovne karakteristike..................................................................................................................5 2.1 Geografski položaj (lokacija)......................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Opšti podaci .................................................................................................................................. 7 2.3 Klima ............................................................................................................................................. 8 2.4 Lokalna samouprava (administracija) ......................................................................................... 10 2.5 Istorija, tradicija i kulturno nasleđe.............................................................................................. 15 3 Prirodni resursi ..........................................................................................................................16 4 Ljudski resursi ...........................................................................................................................20 4.1 Stanovništvo (broj stanovnika i stopa rasta) .............................................................................. -
WBIF Monitoring Report Published
MONITORING REPORT May 2021 MONITORING REPORT Abbreviations and acronyms AFD Agence Française de Développement KfW kfW Development Bank bn Billion MD Main Design CBA Cost-Benefit Analysis m Million CD Concept Design PD Preliminary Design CEB Council of Europe Development Bank PFG Project Financiers’ Group CF Co-financing / Investment Grant PFS Pre-feasibility Study DD Detailed Design PIU Support to Project Implementation Unit EWBJF European Western Balkans Joint Fund PSD Public Sector Development EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and RBMP River Basin Management Plan Development REEP/REEP Plus Regional Energy Efficiency Programme for EBRD SSF EBRD Shareholder Special Fund the Western Balkans EFA Economic and Financial Appraisal SC Steering Committee EIA Environmental Impact Assessment SD Sector Development EIB European Investment Bank SDP Sector Development Project EFSE European Fund for Southeast Europe SIA Social Impact Assessment ESIA Environmental and Social Impact SOC Social Sector Assessment SOW Supervision of Works ENE Energy Sector TA Technical Assistance ENV Environment Sector TMA Technical and Management Assistance EU European Union ToR Terms of Reference EWBJF European Western Balkans Joint Fund TRA Transport Sector FAA Financial Affordability Analysis WB EDIF Western Balkans Enterprise and Innovation FS Feasibility Study Facility GGF Green for Growth Fund WBG World Bank Group ID Identification WBIF Western Balkans Investment Framework IFI International Financial Institution WWTP Wastewater Treatment Plant IPA Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance IPF Infrastructure Project Facility IRS Interest Rate Subsidies This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the Western Balkans Investment Framework and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. -
S/2007/582 Security Council
United Nations S/2007/582 Security Council Distr.: General 28 September 2007 Original: English Report of the Secretary-General on the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo Introduction 1. The present report is submitted pursuant to Security Council resolution 1244 (1999) by which the Council decided to establish the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK) and requested the Secretary-General to report at regular intervals on the implementation of the mandate. It covers the activities of UNMIK and developments in Kosovo (Serbia), from 1 June to 31 August 2007. Kosovo future status process 2. On 1 August, I issued a statement welcoming the Contact Group’s agreement on modalities for further negotiations between Belgrade and Pristina during a new period of engagement. This effort is being led by a “Troika”, comprising representatives of the European Union, the Russian Federation and the United States of America. The United Nations has been providing support to the Troika’s mediation effort. On 30 August, the Troika held proximity talks in Vienna with delegations representing Serbia and Kosovo. Prior to those talks, the Troika held its first meeting with the Serbian Government on 10 August and with the Kosovo Unity Team on 11 and 12 August. I look forward to the Contact Group reporting to me on the results of the period of engagement by 10 December. Political situation 3. During the reporting period, the overriding political focus in Kosovo was on the deliberations on a new resolution in the Security Council. The Kosovo Albanian community and its leadership expressed disappointment when the Council failed to adopt a new resolution. -
Relation Between Radon in Schools and in Dwellings: a Case Study in a Rural Region of Southern Serbia – the “Onion Study”
Relation between radon in schools and in dwellings: a case study in a rural region of Southern Serbia – the “Onion Study” P. Bossew 1, Z.S. Žuni ć 2, C. Carpentieri 3, N. Veselinovi ć 2, G. Venoso 3, T. Tollefsen 5, S. Antignani 3, P. Kolarž 4, V. Udovi čić4, R. Banjanac 4, F. Bochicchio 3 1 German Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Köpenicker Allee 120-130, 10318 Berlin, Germany; [email protected] 2 Institute of Nuclear Sciences “Vinca”, University of Belgrade, P.O. Box 522, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia 3 Italian National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy 4 Institute of Physics, University of Belgrade, Pregrevica 118, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia 5 Institute for Transuranium Elements, European Commission - DG Joint Research Centre, Via E. Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra (VA), Italy Rationale & background - 1 • question 1: is there a statistical relationship between indoor Rn concentrations in dwellings (C) and schools (S) at nearby locations? (it can be expected for physical reasons) • question 2: if so, how can it be quantified? Can C and S be predicted from each other? Onion1-SEERAS-pb140525 2 of 16 Rationale & background - 2 -380000 • Background 1: Kriging school surveys are easier -400000 Sokobanja Bq/m³ than surveys of dwellings; -420000 600 identification of Rn prone Serbia 550 -440000 500 Vlasotince areas and estimates of Rn in 450 -460000 Bojnik dwellings from Rn in schools Crna Trava 400 350 -480000 would be practical. Lebane Surdulica Vladicin Han 300 Vranje BG • Background 2: -500000 250 For S Serbia a “school Rn” Medveda 200 -520000 150 XK Bujanovac map has been created. -
Department of Consulting and Technical Documentation
DEPARTMENT OF CONSULTING AND TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION • Documentation in the field of environment protection • Environmental Impact Assessment Study • References: • “LUKOIL-BEOPETROL”-“LUKOIL-SRBIJA” AD, Beograd, for the gas stations in Beograd, Novi Sad, Niš (Medijana, Jastrebac, BožidarAdžija), Ćićevac, Jagodina, Aleksandrovac, Ćuprija, Surdulica, Se čanj, Kanjiža, Požarevac, Smederevo, Valjevo, Leskovc. • “EUROLIFT” DOO, Niš • “JUGO-IMPEX E.E.R” DOO, Niš • “UMKA” AD Umka, Ogranak“NIŠ” • “WINNERS COMPANY” DOO, Jagodina , Poultry farm in Velika Plana-Veliko Orašje • “WINNERS COMPANY” DOO, Jagodina, Poultry farm in Požarevac-Malo Crni će • “NIŠ-EKSPRES” AD, Niš • “FRAD FILTERI” AD, Aleksinac • “TOPLI ČKI VINOGRADI” DOO , Beloljin, Gojinovac • JKP “TRŽNICA” , Niš • JKP “GRADSKA TOPLANA“ , Niš • “MARKET INŽENJERING“ DOO, Niš • “BETAHEM” DOO, Niš • “JELA JAGODINA” DOO, Jagodina • “KOLOR PRES” DOO, Lapovo • “AUTO CENTAR BOBAN”, Beograd • “PROMONT KOMERC”, Niš • “FOODLEND” DOO, Brus, Igroš • “NEŠA KOMERC”, Kušiljevo • “UDARNIK GRADNJA” DOO, Velika Plana • “UDARNIK KOMERC” DOO, Velika Plana • “LU ČA GRUPA” DOO, Smederevska Palanka • “DU INTEGRALI” DOO, Smederevo • “EUROPEAN RETAIL COMPANY“ DOO, Niš • “EUROPLAST” DOO, Niš • “ANDREJI Ć” DOO, Beloljin 1 • “METALA BOR” DOO, Svilajnac • “JUŽNA MORAVA” DOO, Vranje • JKP “GRADSKA TOPLANA”, Pirot, boiler room“CENTRALA” ans heating plant “SENJAK” • SR “GUMITEX”, Blace • SZTR “ALUPLAST”, Svilajnac • STR „BELI BOR”, Leskovac • ZDRAVSTVENI CENTAR VRANJE “, Boiler room that uses both liquid and firm heating -
ODLUKU O Izboru Pravnih Lica Za Poslove Iz Programa Mera Zdravstvene Zaštite Životinja Za Period 2014–2016
Na osnovu člana 53. stav 5. Zakona o veterinarstvu („Službeni glasnik RS”, br. 91/05, 30/10, 93/12), Ministar poljoprivrede, šumarstva i vodoprivrede donosi ODLUKU o izboru pravnih lica za poslove iz Programa mera zdravstvene zaštite životinja za period 2014–2016. godine Poslovi iz Programa mera za period 2014–2016. godine, koji su utvrđeni kao poslovi od javnog interesa, ustupaju se sledećim pravnim licima: Grad Beograd 1. VS „Tika Vet” Mladenovac Rabrovac, Jagnjilo, Markovac Amerić, Beljevac, Velika Ivanča, Velika Krsna, Vlaška, Granice, Dubona, Kovačevac, Koraćica, Mala Vrbica, 2. VS „Mladenovac” Mladenovac Međulužje, Mladenovac, selo Mladenovac, Pružatovac, Rajkovac, Senaja, Crkvine, Šepšin Baljevac, Brović, Vukićevica, Grabovac, Draževac, VS „Aćimović– 3. Obrenovac Zabrežje, Jasenak, Konatica, LJubinić, Mislođin, Piroman, Obrenovac” Poljane, Stubline, Trstenica Belo Polje, Brgulice, Veliko Polje, Dren, Zvečka, Krtinska, 4. VS „Dr Kostić” Obrenovac Orašac, Ratari, Rvati, Skela, Ušće, Urovci 5. VS „Simbiosis Vet” Obrenovac Obrenovac, Barič, Mala Moštanica 6. VS „Nutrivet” Grocka Begaljica, Pudarci, Dražanj Umčari, Boleč, Brestovik, Vinča, Grocka, Živkovac, 7. VS „Grocka” Grocka Zaklopača, Kaluđerica, Kamendo, Leštane, Pudraci, Ritopek Baroševac, Prkosava, Rudovci, Strmovo, Mali Crljeni, 8. VS „Arnika Veterina” Lazarevac Kruševica, Trbušnica, Bistrica, Dren Vrbovno, Stepojevac, Leskovac, Sokolovo, Cvetovac, 9. VS „Artmedika Vet” Lazarevac Vreoci, Veliki Crljeni, Junkovac, Arapovac, Sakulja Lazarevac, Šopić, Barzilovica, Brajkovac, Čibutkovica, VS „Alfa Vet CO 10. Lazarevac Dudovica, Lukovica, Medoševac, Mirosaljci, Zeoke, Petka, 2007” Stubica, Šušnjar, Županjac, Burovo 11. VS „Ardis Vet” Sopot Slatina, Dučina, Rogača, Sibnica, Drlupa 12. VS „Uniprim Vet” Barajevo Arnajevo, Rožanci, Beljina, Boždarevac, Manić 13. VS „Vidra-Vet” Surčin Bečmen, Petrovčić, Novi Beograd, Bežanija Surčin Surčin, Dobanovci, Boljevci, Jakovo, Progar 14. -
Подкласс Exogenia Collin, 1912
Research Article ISSN 2336-9744 (online) | ISSN 2337-0173 (print) The journal is available on line at www.ecol-mne.com Contribution to the knowledge of distribution of Colubrid snakes in Serbia LJILJANA TOMOVIĆ1,2,4*, ALEKSANDAR UROŠEVIĆ2,4, RASTKO AJTIĆ3,4, IMRE KRIZMANIĆ1, ALEKSANDAR SIMOVIĆ4, NENAD LABUS5, DANKO JOVIĆ6, MILIVOJ KRSTIĆ4, SONJA ĐORĐEVIĆ1,4, MARKO ANĐELKOVIĆ2,4, ANA GOLUBOVIĆ1,4 & GEORG DŽUKIĆ2 1 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 2 University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 3 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Dr Ivana Ribara 91, 11070 Belgrade, Serbia 4 Serbian Herpetological Society “Milutin Radovanović”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 5 University of Priština, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Biology Department, Lole Ribara 29, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia 6 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Vožda Karađorđa 14, 18000 Niš, Serbia *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Received 28 March 2015 │ Accepted 31 March 2015 │ Published online 6 April 2015. Abstract Detailed distribution pattern of colubrid snakes in Serbia is still inadequately described, despite the long historical study. In this paper, we provide accurate distribution of seven species, with previously published and newly accumulated faunistic records compiled. Comparative analysis of faunas among all Balkan countries showed that Serbian colubrid fauna is among the most distinct (together with faunas of Slovenia and Romania), due to small number of species. Zoogeographic analysis showed high chorotype diversity of Serbian colubrids: seven species belong to six chorotypes. South-eastern Serbia (Pčinja River valley) is characterized by the presence of all colubrid species inhabiting our country, and deserves the highest conservation status at the national level. -
LEADER – Osnovni Principi I Stvaranje Partnerstava
LEADER – osnovni principi i stvaranje partnerstava RADIONICA Negotin, 22.05.2018.god. TEME RADIONICE • Predstavljanje osnova LEADER pristupa • Prezentacija Lokalnih akcionih grupa u Srbiji – kratak razvojni put i trenutno stanje • Predstavljanje „Preporuka Istocnoj Srbiji u Uspostavljanju i izgradnji Lokalnih Akcionih Grupa u Odnosu na EU Integracije“ • Nacrt Pravilnika za Leader: u izradi LEADER – 27 godina uspešne metodologije za ruralni razvoj Postizanje strateških ciljeva jedne ili većeg broja osa Bolje upravljanje na lokalnom nivou Razvoj iznutra (lokalni resursi za rast i nova radna mesta) LEADER/Axis LEADER evolution 2007-2013 2,402 LAGs LEADER/Measure Mainstreamed 2014-2020 LEADER + 2,530 LAGs 2000-2006 LEADER II 1,153 LAGs Expected to reach 1994-1999 162 million All types of rural inhabitants 906 LAGs areas Disadvantaged rural areas LEADER I 1991-1993 Total public budget: 217 LAGs Total public budget: 9.7 Experimental 8.9 BILLION € phase Total public budget: Total public budget: BILLION € Total public budget: 5.4 BILLION € 5.1 BILLION € 1.2 BILLION € LEADER features • Bottom-up • Area based • Local partnership (Local Action Group) • Multi-sectoral integrated strategies • Networking • Innovation • Cooperation (inter-territorial and transnational) 5 Uloga i funkcionisanje LAG • Šta je LAG? • Zainteresovane strane: Ministarstvo odgovorno za ruralni razvoj, koje se naziva „Upravljačko telo“, Agencija za plaćanje i lokalne akcione grupe • Zadaci lokalnih akcionih grupa • LAG Teritorija LAG STRUKTURA LAG treba sadržavati najmanje sledeće -
Environmental and Risk Assessment of the Timok River Basin 2008
REC GREY PAPER Environmental and Risk Assessment of the Timok River Basin 2008 ENVSEC Initiative DISCLAIMER The opinion expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the REC, UNECE or any of the ENVSEC partners. 1 AUTHORS: Momir Paunović, PhD, University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, Serbia Ventzislav Vassilev, SIECO Consult Ltd. Bulgaria Svetoslav Cheshmedjiev, SIECO Consult Ltd. Bulgaria Vladica Simić, PhD, Institute for Biology and Ecology, University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Science, Serbia ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The present report was developed with contributions by: Mr. Stephen Stec, Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe Ms. Cecile Monnier, Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe Ms. Jovanka Ignjatovic, Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe Ms. Ella Behlyarova, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Mr. Bo Libert, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Mr. Milcho Lalov, Major of Bregovo municipality Ms. Danka Marinova, Danube River Basin Directorate - Pleven, Bulgaria 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..................................................................................................................................2 ABBREVIATIONS...............................................................................................................................................5 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................6 -
Life in Transition Survey II
Life in Transition Survey II DRAFT Technical Report June 2011 Legal notice © 2011 Ipsos MORI – all rights reserved. The contents of this report constitute the sole and exclusive property of Ipsos MORI. Ipsos MORI retains all right, title and interest, including without limitation copyright, in or to any Ipsos MORI trademarks, technologies, methodologies, products, analyses, software and know-how included or arising out of this report or used in connection with the preparation of this report. No license under any copyright is hereby granted or implied. The contents of this report are of a commercially sensitive and confidential nature and intended solely for the review and consideration of the person or entity to which it is addressed. No other use is permitted and the addressee undertakes not to disclose all or part of this report to any third party (including but not limited, where applicable, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act 2000) without the prior written consent of the Company Secretary of Ipsos MORI. Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................ 2 1.1. Background and history ....................................................................... 2 1.2. Structure of this report ......................................................................... 2 1.3. Key specifications ................................................................................ 3 2. Questionnaire development and piloting ................................. 5 2.1 Introduction ..........................................................................................