DOCSLIB.ORG

The Cambridge Companion to SCIENCE and RELIGION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Cambridge Companion to SCIENCE and RELIGION The Cambridge Companion to SCIENCE AND RELIGION In recent years, the relations between science and religion have been the object of renewed attention. Developments in physics, biology and the neurosciences have reinvigorated discussions about the nature of life and ultimate reality. At the same time, the growth of anti-evolutionary and intelligent design movements has led many to the view that science and religion are necessarily in confl ict. This bookprovides a comprehensive introduction to the relations between science and religion, with contributions from historians, philosophers, scientists and theologians. It explores the impact of religion on the origins and development of science, religious reactions to Darwinism, and the link between science and secularization. It also offers in-depth discussions of contemporary issues, with perspectives from cosmology, evolution- ary biology, psychology and bioethics. The volume is rounded out with philosophical refl ections on the connections betweenatheism and science, the nature of scientifi c and religious knowledge, anddivine action and human freedom. Peter Harrison is Andreas Idreos Professor of Science and Religion at the University of Oxford, and Director of the Ian Ramsey Centre, University of Oxford. He is the author of The Bible, Protestantism and the Rise of Natural Science (Cambridge, 1998), and The Fall of Man and the Foundation of Science (Cambridge, 2007). CAMBRIDGE COMPANIONS TO RELIGION A series of companions to major topics and key fi gures in theology and religious studies. Each volume contains specially commissioned chapters by international scholars which provide an accessible and stimulating introduction to the subject for new readers and non-specialists. Other titles in the series The Cambridge Companion to Christian Doctrine edited by Colin Gunton (1997) isbn 0 521 47118 4 hardback isbn 0 521 47695 x paperback The Cambridge Companion to Biblical Interpretation edited by John Barton (1998) isbn 0 521 48144 9 hardback isbn 0 521 48593 2 paperback The Cambridge Companion to Dietrich Bonhoeffer edited by John de Gruchy (1999) isbn 0 521 58258 x hardback isbn 0 521 58781 6 paperback The Cambridge Companion to Karl Barth edited by John Webster (2000) isbn 0 521 58476 0 hardback isbn 0 521 58560 0 paperback The Cambridge Companion to Christian Ethics edited by Robin Gill (2001) isbn 0 521 77070 x hardback isbn 0 521 77918 9 paperback The Cambridge Companion to Jesus edited by Markus Bockmuehl (2001) isbn 0 521 79261 4 hardback isbn 0 521 79678 4 paperback The Cambridge Companion to Feminist Theology edited by Susan Frank Parsons (2002) isbn 0 521 66327 x hardback isbn 0 521 66380 6 paperback The Cambridge Companion to Martin Luther edited by Donald K. McKim (2003) isbn 0 521 81648 3 hardback isbn 0 521 01673 8 paperback The Cambridge Companion to St Paul edited by James D. G. Dunn (2003) isbn 0 521 78155 8 hardback isbn 0 521 78694 0 paperback The Cambridge Companion to Postmodern Theology edited by Kevin J. Vanhoozer (2003) isbn 0 521 79062 x hardback isbn 0 521 79395 5 paperback The Cambridge Companion to John Calvin edited by Donald K. McKim (2004) isbn 0 521 81647 5 hardback isbn 0 521 01672 x paperback The Cambridge Companion to Hans Urs Von Balthasar edited by Edward T. Oakes , SJ and David Moss (2004) isbn 0 521 81467 7 hardback isbn 0 521 89147 7 paperback Continued at the back of the book The Cambridge Companion to SCIENCE AND RELIGION Edited by Peter Harrison CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo, Delhi, Dubai, Tokyo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521712514 © Cambridge University Press 2010 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2010 Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication data The Cambridge companion to science and religion / edited by Peter Harrison. p. cm. – (Cambridge companions to religion) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-521-88538-6 – ISBN 978-0-521-71251-4 (pbk.) 1. Religion and science. I. Harrison, Peter, 1955– II. Title. III. Series. bl241.c317 2010 201′.65–dc22 2010016793 ISBN 978-0-521-88538-6 Hardback ISBN 978-0-521-71251-4 Paperback Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. Contents Notes on contributors page ix Introduction 1 Peter Harrison Part I Historical interactions 19 1 The fate of science in patristic and medieval Christendom 21 David C. Lindberg 2 Religion and the Scientifi c Revolution 39 John Henry 3 Natural theology and the sciences 59 Jonathan R. Topham 4 Religious reactions to Darwin 80 Jon H. Roberts 5 Science and secularization 103 John Hedley Brooke Part II Religion and contemporary science 125 6 Scientifi c creationism and intelligent design 127 Ronald L. Numbers 7 Evolution and the inevitability of intelligent life 148 Simon Conway Morris 8 God, physics and the Big Bang 173 William R. Stoeger, SJ 9 Psychology and theology 190 Fraser Watts 10 Science, bioethics and religion 207 John H. Evans vii viii Contents Part III Philosophical perspectives 227 11 Atheism, naturalism and science: three in one? 229 Michael Ruse 12 Divine action, emergence and scientifi c explanation 244 Nancey Murphy 13 Science, God and cosmic purpose 260 John Haught 14 Ways of relating science and religion 278 Mikael Stenmark A guide to further reading 296 Index 303 Notes on contributors John Hedley Brooke was the inaugural Andreas Idreos Professor of Science and Religion at the University of Oxford, and served in that Chair from 1999 until his retirement in 2006. His several books include Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives (1991), Thinking about Matter: Studies in the History of Chemical Philosophy (1995), (with Geoffrey Cantor) Reconstructing Nature: The Engagement of Science and Religion (1998) and Science in Theistic Contexts: Cognitive Dimensions (ed. with Margaret Osler and Jitse van der Meer) (2001). Simon Conway Morris holds an ad hominem Chair in Evolutionary Palaeobiology in Cambridge University, where he is also a Fellow of St John’s College. He was elected to the Royal Society in 1990, and has won various awards. His most recent book is Life’s Solution: Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe ( 2003), and he is currently engaged with Darwin’s Compass . He is active in the public understanding of science and the science/religion debates. At home he can usu- ally be found with both hands full: one with a volume of G. K. Chesterton, the other with a glass of wine. John H. Evans is Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of California, San Diego. His research focuses on debates in the public sphere – specifi cally on religious involvement in politics, health policy and public bioethics. He is the author of Playing God? Human Genetic Engineering and the Rationalization of Public Bioethical Debate (2002) and Contested Reproduction: Genetic Techno- logies, Religion and Public Debate (2010). Peter Harrison is Andreas Idreos Professor of Science and Religion at the University of Oxford, where he is also Director of the Ian Ramsey Centre and a Fellow of Harris Manchester College. He has published extensively in the area of early modern intellectual history with a focus on the relations among science, religion and philosophy. His books include ‘Religion’ and the Religions in the English Enlightenment (1990), The Bible, Protestantism and the Rise of Natural Science (1998), and The Fall of Man and the Foundations of Science (2007). John Haught is Senior Fellow, Science and Religion, Woodstock Theological Center, Georgetown University. His area of specialization is systematic the- ology, with a particular interest in issues pertaining to science, cosmology, evo- lution, ecology and religion. He is the author of many books on science and religion including God and the New Atheism (2007), Christianity and Science ix x Notes on contributors (2007), Is Nature Enough? (2007), Deeper than Darwin (2004), and God after Darwin (2007) . He has also authored numerous articles and reviews. He lectures internationally on many issues related to science and religion. John Henry is a Reader in the Science Studies Unit of the University of Edinburgh. He has published widely in the history of science from the Middle Ages to the nineteenth century, but has a special interest in the Renaissance and early modern periods. He has recently published (with John M. Forrester) Jean Fernel’s On the Hidden Causes of Things: Forms, Souls, and Occult Diseases in Renaissance Medicine (2005), and the third edition of his Scientifi c Revolution and the Origins of Modern Science has just appeared (2008). David C. Lindberg is Hilldale Professor Emeritus of the History of Science at the University of Wisconsin, past-president of the History of Science Society, and a recipient of its Sarton Medal for lifetime scholarly achievement. He is a Fellow of the Medieval Academy of America and the Académie internationale d’histoire des sciences. He has been a Guggenheim Fellow and a visiting member of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton. He has written or edited thirteen books, including The Beginnings of Western Science (1992, 2008), recipient of the 1994 Watson Davis Prize of the History of Science Society and the 1995 John Templeton Foundation Prize for Outstanding Books in Theology and Natural Science.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Dis)Believing and Belonging: Investigating the Narratives of Young British Atheists1
    (Dis)Believing and Belonging: Investigating the Narratives of Young British Atheists1 REBECCA CATTO Coventry University JANET ECCLES Independent Researcher Abstract The development and public prominence of the ‘New Atheism’ in the West, particularly the UK and USA, since the millennium has occasioned considerable growth in the study of ‘non-religion and secularity’. Such work is uncovering the variety and complexity of associated categories, different public figures, arguments and organi- zations involved. There has been a concomitant increase in research on youth and religion. As yet, however, little is known about young people who self-identify as atheist, though the statistics indicate that in Britain they are the cohort most likely to select ‘No religion’ in surveys. This article addresses this gap with presentation of data gathered with young British people who describe themselves as atheists. Atheism is a multifaceted identity for these young people developed over time and through experience. Disbelief in God and other non-empirical propositions such as in an afterlife and the efficacy of homeopathy and belief in progress through science, equality and freedom are central to their narratives. Hence belief is taken as central to the sociological study of atheism, but understood as formed and performed in relationships in which emotions play a key role. In the late modern context of contemporary Britain, these young people are far from amoral individualists. We employ current theorizing about the sacred to help understand respondents’ belief and value-oriented non-religious identities in context. Keywords: Atheism, Youth, UK, Belief, Sacred Phil Zuckerman (2010b, vii) notes that for decades British sociologist Colin Campbell’s call for a widespread analysis of irreligion went largely un- heeded (Campbell 1971).
    [Show full text]
  • John Hedley Brooke Interviewed by Paul Merchant C1672/8
    NATIONAL LIFE STORIES ‘Science and Religion: Exploring the Spectrum’ John Hedley Brooke Interviewed by Paul Merchant C1672/8 This transcript is copyright of the British Library Board. Please refer to the Oral History curators at the British Library prior to any publication or broadcast from this document. Oral History The British Library 96 Euston Road NW1 2DB 020 7412 7404 [email protected] IMPORTANT Access to this interview and transcript is for private research only. Please refer to the Oral History curators at the British Library prior to any publication or broadcast from this document. Oral History The British Library 96 Euston Road London NW1 2DB 020 7412 7404 [email protected] Every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of this transcript, however no transcript is an exact translation of the spoken word, and this document is intended to be a guide to the original recording, not replace it. Should you find any errors please inform the Oral History curators ([email protected]) The British Library National Life Stories Interview Summary Sheet Title Page Ref no: C1672/08 Collection title: ‘Science and Religion: Exploring the Spectrum’ Life Story Interviews Interviewee’s surname: Hedley Brooke Title: Professor Interviewee’s John Sex: Male forename: Occupation: Historian of science Date and place of birth: 20th May 1944, and religion Retford, Nottinghamshire, UK Mother’s occupation: Father’s occupation: teacher teacher Dates of recording, Compact flash cards used, tracks (from – to): 21/5/15 (track 1-3), 26/06/2015 (track 4-5), 22/09/2015 (track 6-7), 20/10/2015 (track 8-9), 08/12/15 (track 10-11), 02/02/16 (12-14), 26/04/16 (track 15) Location of interview: Interviewees' home, Yealand Conyers near Lancaster and the British Library Name of interviewer: Paul Merchant Type of recorder: Marantz PMD661on compact flash Recording format : audio file 12 WAV 24 bit 48 kHz 2-channel Total no.
    [Show full text]
  • Tiffany Webster. 120213511. SIIBS. the University of Sheffield. Phd Thesis
    Tiffany Webster. 120213511. SIIBS. The University of Sheffield. PhD Thesis. March 2017. “When the Bible Meets the Black Stuff: A Contextual Bible Study Experiment.” 1 Tiffany Webster. 120213511. SIIBS. The University of Sheffield. PhD Thesis. March 2017. “When the Bible Meets the Black Stuff: A Contextual Bible Study Experiment.” 2 Tiffany Webster. 120213511. SIIBS. The University of Sheffield. PhD Thesis. March 2017. “When the Bible Meets the Black Stuff: A Contextual Bible Study Experiment.” THE SHEFFIELD INSTITUTE FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY BIBLICAL STUDIES (SIIBS) THE FACULTY OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES THE UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD “WHEN THE BIBLE MEETS THE BLACK STUFF: A CONTEXTUAL BIBLE STUDY EXPERIMENT” A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY TIFFANY WEBSTER 120213511 06 March, 2017 3 Tiffany Webster. 120213511. SIIBS. The University of Sheffield. PhD Thesis. March 2017. “When the Bible Meets the Black Stuff: A Contextual Bible Study Experiment.” CONTENTS ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….7 CHAPTER ONE. INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………8 Research Aims. …………………………………………………………………………………………..8 The Why of “When the Bible Meets the Black Stuff” or Why this Research is Important…………………………………………………………………………………………………9 How this Research Took Shape………………………………………………………………….20 Participant Consent……………………………………………………………………………………28 Terminological Clarification……………………………………………………………………….29 CHAPTER TWO. WORKING REFLEXIVELY………………………………………………………………..31 Defining Reflexivity……………………………………………………………………………………33
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Aquinas on the Separability of Accidents and Dietrich of Freiberg’S Critique
    Thomas Aquinas on the Separability of Accidents and Dietrich of Freiberg’s Critique David Roderick McPike Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctorate in Philosophy degree in Philosophy Department of Philosophy Faculty of Arts University of Ottawa © David Roderick McPike, Ottawa, Canada, 2015 Abstract The opening chapter briefly introduces the Catholic doctrine of the Eucharist and the history of its appropriation into the systematic rational discourse of philosophy, as culminating in Thomas Aquinas’ account of transubstantiation with its metaphysical elaboration of the separability of accidents from their subject (a substance), so as to exist (supernaturally) without a subject. Chapter Two expounds St. Thomas’ account of the separability of accidents from their subject. It shows that Thomas presents a consistent rational articulation of his position throughout his works on the subject. Chapter Three expounds Dietrich of Freiberg’s rejection of Thomas’ view, examining in detail his treatise De accidentibus, which is expressly dedicated to demonstrating the utter impossibility of separate accidents. Especially in light of Kurt Flasch’s influential analysis of this work, which praises Dietrich for his superior level of ‘methodological consciousness,’ this chapter aims to be painstaking in its exposition and to comprehensively present Dietrich’s own views just as we find them, before taking up the task of critically assessing Dietrich’s position. Chapter Four critically analyses the competing doctrinal positions expounded in the preceding two chapters. It analyses the various elements of Dietrich’s case against Thomas and attempts to pinpoint wherein Thomas and Dietrich agree and wherein they part ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Review 2015-16 Nurturing Wisdom ST GEORGE’S HOUSE
    ST GEORGE’S HOUSE Annual Review 2015-16 nurturing wisdom ST GEORGE’S HOUSE contents 1 Foreword 2 The Warden’s Report 4 ‘Reflections on Shakespeare’ - 2016 Annual Lecture given by Dr Rowan Williams 10 Programme Report 2015-16 13 Trustees Report 14 Financial Statement 16 Council Membership 17 Corporate Associates nurturing wisdom Foreword by The Right Reverend David Conner KCVO Dean of Windsor Once again, it is my pleasure to write a brief Foreword to the St George’s House Annual Review, to note that the House continues to flourish, and to try to convey something of the respect I have for those whose hard work and enthusiasm contribute to its being valued by many people. Clare Four times each year, at our quarterly ‘Obit’ services in St David George’s Chapel, we commemorate and give thanks for the Founder and Benefactors of the College of St George. As we do Photographs: so, we remember all those “who helped to create and establish St George’s House as a centre of learning and study”. We are reminded at each ‘Obit’ observation of the significant part that St George’s House has played in the history of the College. During 2016, as you will see from what follows in this Review, we were delighted to mark the 50th anniversary of the founding of the House by HRH The Duke of Edinburgh and Dean Robin Woods. During the past year, we have been especially mindful of the vision, imagination, and profound concern to help build a better world that were at the beginning, and have remained through the years, the inspiration of the architects of the St George’s House wide-ranging programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Renaissance Theories of Vision Edited by John Hendrix, University of Lincoln, UK and Rhode Island School of Design and Roger Williams University, USA, and Charles H
    Renaissance Theories of Vision Edited by John Hendrix, University of Lincoln, UK and Rhode Island School of Design and Roger Williams University, USA, and Charles H. Carman, University at Buffalo, USA Visual Culture in Early Modernity December 2010 244 x 172 mm 258 pages Hardback 978-1-4094-0024-0 £65.00 Includes 18 b&w illustrations How are processes of vision, perception, and sensation conceived in the Renaissance? How are those conceptions made manifest in the arts? The essays in this volume address these and similar questions to establish important theoretical and philosophical bases for artistic production in the Renaissance and beyond. The essays also attend to the views of historically significant writers from the ancient classical period to the eighteenth century, including Plato, Aristotle, Plotinus, St Augustine, Ibn Sina (Avicenna), Ibn al-Haytham (Alhazen), Ibn Sahl, Marsilio Ficino, Nicholas of Cusa, Leon Battista Alberti, Gian Paolo Lomazzo, Gregorio Comanini, John Davies, Rene Descartes, Samuel van Hoogstraten, and George Berkeley. Contributors carefully scrutinize and illustrate the effect of changing and evolving ideas of intellectual and physical vision on artistic practice in Florence, Rome, Venice, England, Austria, and the Netherlands. The artists whose work and practices are discussed include Fra Angelico, Donatello, Leonardo da Vinci, Filippino Lippi, Giovanni Bellini, Raphael, Parmigianino, Titian, Bronzino, Johannes Gumpp and Rembrandt van Rijn. Taken together, the essays provide the reader with a fresh perspective on the intellectual confluence between art, science, philosophy, and literature across Renaissance Europe. Contents Introduction, John S. Hendrix and Charles H. Carman; Classical optics and the perspectivae traditions leading to the Renaissance, Nader El-Bizri; Meanings of perspective in the Renaissance: tensions and resolution, Charles H.
    [Show full text]
  • CV Current Online 1
    Curriculum Vitae Peter Harrison Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities! Forgan-Smith Building, Level 5 The University of Queensland Qld 4072 Australia Email. [email protected] Qualifications ______________________________________________________________________ DLitt 2013 University of Oxford MA 2007 University of Oxford PhD 1989 University of Queensland MA 1985 Yale University BA 1983 University of Queensland (1st Class Hons) Dip Ed 1977 University of Queensland BSc 1976 University of Queensland Career History ______________________________________________________________________ Director, Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities, University of Queensland, 2015- Australian Laureate Fellow, 2015-19 Research Professor and Director, Centre for the History of European Discourses, University of Queensland, 2011-15 Senior Research Fellow, Ian Ramsey Centre, University of Oxford, 2011- Andreas Idreos Professor of Science and Religion; Director of the Ian Ramsey Centre, Fellow of Harris Manchester College, University of Oxford, 2007-11 Assistant Professor/Associate Professor/Professor of History and Philosophy, Bond University, 1989-2006 Fellowships and Honours ______________________________________________________________________ • Bampton Lecturer (Oxford), 2019 • Corresponding member, International Academy of the History of Science • Aldersgate Prize, 2015, for The Territories of Science and Religion. • Australian Laureate Fellow, 2015-19 • Gifford Lecturer (Edinburgh),’Science, Religion and Modernity’, 6 Lectures, 2010-11 • Christ Church, Oxford. Fowler Hamilton Visiting Fellowship. 2007 (declined) • Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ. Elizabeth and J. Richardson Dilworth Fellowship, January–August, 2005 • Bruce Mansfield Prize (Religious History) 2005 • Vice-Chancellor’s Award (Research Excellence), 2004 • Centenary Medal. Australian Honours, General List, ‘For Service to Australian Society and the Humanities in the Study of Philosophy and Religion’. 2003 • Foundation member, International Society for Science and Religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and the Individual
    RELIGION AND THE INDIVIDUAL This volume brings together a significant set of reflections on the meaning of religion for the individual as well as society. In doing so it makes a timely and valuable contribution to our understanding both of individualizing tendencies within religion, and of appropriate theoretical and methodological responses to that shift. Professor Linda Woodhead, Director AHRC/ESRC Religion and Society Programme, Lancaster University, UK What does religion mean to the individual? How are people religious and what do their beliefs, practices and identities mean to them? The individual’s place within studies of religion has tended to be overlooked recently in favour of macro analyses. Religion and the Individual draws together authors from around the world to explore belief, practice and identity. Using original case studies and other work firmly placed in the empirical, contributors discuss what religious belief means to the individual. They examine how people embody what religion means to them through practice, considering the different meanings that people attach to religion and the social expressions of their personal understandings and the ways in which religion shapes how people see themselves in relation to others. This work is cross-cultural, with contributions from Asia, Europe and North America. THEOLOGY AND RELIGION IN INTERDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVE SERIES IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE BSA SOCIOLOGY OF RELIGION STUDY GROUP BSA Sociology of Religion Study Group Series editor: Pink Dandelion and the publications committee Theology and Religion in Interdisciplinary Perspective Series editors: Douglas Davies and Richard Fenn The British Sociological Association Sociology of Religion Study Group began in 1975 and provides the primary forum in Britain for scholarship in the sociology of religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Putting Science and Engineering at the Heart of Government Policy
    House of Commons Innovation, Universities, Science and Skills Committee Putting Science and Engineering at the Heart of Government Policy Eighth Report of Session 2008–09 Volume II Oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 8 July 2009 HC 168-II Published on 23 July 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Innovation, Universities, Science & Skills Committee The Innovation, Universities, Science & Skills Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills. Current membership Mr Phil Willis (Liberal Democrat, Harrogate and Knaresborough)(Chairman) Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods (Labour, City of Durham) Mr Tim Boswell (Conservative, Daventry) Mr Ian Cawsey (Labour, Brigg & Goole) Mrs Nadine Dorries (Conservative, Mid Bedfordshire) Dr Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat, Oxford West & Abingdon) Dr Brian Iddon (Labour, Bolton South East) Mr Gordon Marsden (Labour, Blackpool South) Dr Bob Spink (UK Independence Party, Castle Point) Ian Stewart (Labour, Eccles) Graham Stringer (Labour, Manchester, Blackley) Dr Desmond Turner (Labour, Brighton Kemptown) Mr Rob Wilson (Conservative, Reading East) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental Select Committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No.152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/ius A list of reports from the Committee in this Parliament is included at the back of this volume.
    [Show full text]
  • 'No Religion' in Britain
    Journal of the British Academy, 4, 245–61. DOI 10.5871/jba/004.245 Posted 8 December 2016. © The British Academy 2016 The rise of ‘no religion’ in Britain: The emergence of a new cultural majority The British Academy Lecture read 19 January 2016 LINDA WOODHEAD Abstract: This paper reviews new and existing evidence which shows that ‘no religion’ has risen steadily to rival ‘Christian’ as the preferred self-designation of British people. Drawing on recent survey research by the author, it probes the category of ‘no religion’ and offers a characterisation of the ‘nones’ which reveals, amongst other things, that most are not straightforwardly secular. It compares the British situation with that of comparable countries, asking why Britain has become one of the few no-religion countries in the world today. An explanation is offered that highlights the importance not only of cultural pluralisation and ethical liberalisation in Britain, but of the churches’ opposite direction of travel. The paper ends by reflecting on the extent to which ‘no religion’ has become the new cultural norm, showing why Britain is most accurately described as between Christian and ‘no religion’. Keywords: religion, no religion, identity, secular, culture, ethics, liberalism, pluralism, Christianity The ‘nones’ are rising in Britain—in a slow, unplanned and almost unnoticed revolu- tion. It has been happening for a long time, but the tipping point came only very recently, the point at which a majority of UK adults described their affiliation as ‘no religion’ rather than ‘Christian’. This article explores the significance of this change. It starts by reviewing exactly what has happened, considers who the nones are, and suggests why the shift has occurred.
    [Show full text]
  • What Counts As Religion in Sociology?
    What Counts as Religion in Sociology? What Counts as Religion in Sociology? The problem of religiosity in sociological methodology Erika Willander Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in University Main Buildning, hall IX, Biskopsgatan 3, Uppsala, Friday, 26 September 2014 at 14:15 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Faculty examiner: Professor James A Beckford (University of Warwick ). Abstract Willander, E. 2014. What Counts as Religion in Sociology? The Problem of Religiosity in Sociological Methodology. 271 pp. Uppsala: Sociologiska institutionen. ISBN 978-91-506-2409-0. This thesis aims to contribute to the ongoing critical discussion within the sociology of reli- gion by focusing on the seldom considered perspective of methodology. As such, it consists of a theoretical part that problematizes the ways in which religion has been analyzed, and an empirical part that develops how religiosity can be approached in sociological studies. The thesis seeks, in other words, to contribute to how sociologists analyze religion, and addresses a research problem that has gained new relevance in the aftermath of criticism of the seculari- zation paradigm. In the theoretical part, the assumptions underlying the ways in which reli- gion is studied are revisited, as is the impact that these have had as faras the empirical study of religion is concerned in one of the countries often assumed to be secularized – i.e. Sweden. The empirical part of the thesis is comprised of three studies based on the latest European Value Survey, qualitative interviews and the Blogosphere on religion-related content (n=220000 blog posts).
    [Show full text]
  • John Hedley Brooke
    C. TH. DIMARAS ANNUAL LECTURE, 2016 JOhn HedleY BROOKE Darwinism and the Survival of Religion SECTION OF NEOHELLENIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF HISTORICAL RESEARCH / NHRF The Historical Review / La Revue Historique Section of Neohellenic Research / Institute of Historical Research Volume XIV (2017) À partir de cette année, la conférence annuelle “C. Th. Dimaras”, dédiée à la mémoire du fondateur du Centre des Recherches Néohelléniques, sera publiée en annex de la Revue Historique. Starting this year, the C. Th. Dimaras Annual Lecture, dedicated to the founder of the Centre of Neohellenic Research, will be published in The Historical Review. FOreWOrd John Hedley Brooke studied the natural sciences at Cambridge University, obtaining a first-class honours degree in 1965. Having obtained a distinction in his study of the history and philosophy of science, his Cambridge doctoral thesis was devoted to the development of organic chemistry in the nineteenth century. A research fellow at Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge (1967–68), his first academic appointment was in the school of mathematical and physical sciences at the University of Sussex (1968–69). From 1969–99 he taught in the history department at Lancaster University, becoming a member of the International Academy of the History of Science in 1993. In 1995, with Prof Geoffrey Cantor, he gave the Gifford Lecture at Glasgow University. From 1999 to 2006, he was the first Andreas Idreos Professor of Science and Religion at Oxford University, director of the Ian Ramsey Centre and fellow of Harris Manchester College. Following retirement, he spent time as a distinguished fellow at the Institute of Advanced Study, University of Durham (2007).
    [Show full text]