Yackety Yack [Serial]
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
AUDIENCE of the FEAST of the FULL MOON 22 February 2016 – 13 Adar 1 5776 23 February 2016 – 14 Adar 1 5776 24 February 2016 – 15 Adar 1 5776
AUDIENCE OF THE FEAST OF THE FULL MOON 22 February 2016 – 13 Adar 1 5776 23 February 2016 – 14 Adar 1 5776 24 February 2016 – 15 Adar 1 5776 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ As a point of understanding never mentioned before in any Akurian Lessons or Scripts and for those who read these presents: When The Most High, Himself, and anyone else in The Great Presence speaks, there is massive vision for all, without exception, in addition to the voices that there cannot be any misunderstanding of any kind by anybody for any reason. It is never a situation where a select sees one vision and another sees anything else even in the slightest detail. That would be a deliberate deception, and The Most High will not tolerate anything false that is not identified as such in His Presence. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Encamped and Headquartered in full array at Philun, 216th Realm, 4,881st Abstract, we received Call to present ourselves before The Most High, ALIHA ASUR HIGH, in accordance with standing alert. In presence with fellow Horsemen Immanuel, Horus and Hammerlin and our respective Seconds, I requested all available Seniors or their respective Seconds to attend in escort. We presented ourselves in proper station and I announced our Company to The Most High in Grand Salute as is the procedure. NOTE: Bold-italics indicate emphasis: In the Script of The Most High, by His direction; in any other, emphasis is mine. The Most High spoke: ""Lord King of Israel El Aku ALIHA ASUR HIGH, Son of David, Son of Fire, you that is Named of My Own Name, know that I am pleased with your Company even unto the farthest of them on station in the Great Distances. -
Walter Clark and the Long Progressive Era in North Carolina. (2015) Directed by Dr
KAISER, JOHN JAMES, Ph.D. Judicial Knight Errant: Walter Clark and the Long Progressive Era in North Carolina. (2015) Directed by Dr. Mark Elliott. 277 pp. From 1889-1924 Walter Clark served on the North Carolina Supreme Court. Clark, the son of a wealthy slaveholding eastern North Carolina family, emerged as a force for progressive change in North Carolina law and politics. During Justice Clark’s tenure on the North Carolina Supreme Court (Associate Justice, 1889-1902; Chief Justice 1903-1924) he forged a progressive jurisprudence that defied the traditional perception of the judiciary as a conservative bulwark against reform and instead promoted labor rights, women’s rights, and public regulation. Clark’s often controversial judicial decisions and political positions led to conflict with the state’s railroad interests, textile mills, and even the wealthy Duke family. While Clark’s activism often pushed the limits of acceptable political engagement by a sitting Supreme Court justice, he was continuously reelected to the North Carolina Supreme Court up until his death in 1924. Clark’s judicial and political career provides insight into progressive politics in North Carolina history. Early twentieth century progressives in North Carolina enacted moderate reforms in education, child labor, women’s rights, and utility regulation through the legislature. Yet Chief Justice Clark offers us a popular political figure whose views pushed for much greater reform. Clark, through legal and political means, influenced Supreme Court opinions and legislation that protected North Carolina’s laborers from workplace injury, limited child labor in the industrial workplace, expanded property and voting rights to women in North Carolina, and pushed for active public regulation of private utility companies. -
TMO Scavenger Hunt.Indd
History Hunt II Prepared by: David Shealy, Lexington, SC I. Content: A history museum is the result of many people donating valuable things. A museum is a repository of public treasures. Treasures are both small and large and serve different purposes for the people that used them. II. Prerequisites: Student should be able to locate most of the artifacts and answer the questions on this list during the group visit. III. Needed: a pencil. IV. Instructional objective: Student finds artifacts that interest them, leading to long-term individual study of that interest. Student might later give an oral or written report on artifact. Requires reading labels and observation of artifacts. V. Procedure: No running, please! Students will be allowed to roam the entire gallery. Hint – the history hunt is consecutive from the Revolutionary War exhibit to the final exhibit, World War II. Teacher may randomly divide the list up according to number of students. VI. Follow-up activity: In student’s next class meeting, set aside time for students to tell about artifacts that interested them. Search the museum for answers to these questions! 1. As you enter the museum, there is a group of paintings from the Revolutionary War. How many British soldiers are in the painting of the Battle of Cowpens by William Ranney? Hint: They wear red uniforms. ______ 2. Whose uniform vest is on the bottom of the Revolutionary War exhibit?______________________________ 3. What was the epithet (nickname) given to Colonel Banastre Tarleton? _______________________________ 4. What is the slogan on the flag for the Abbeville Dragoons? ________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ 5. -
Graham, William Alexander
Published on NCpedia (https://www.ncpedia.org) Home > Graham, William Alexander Graham, William Alexander [1] Share it now! Average: 4.7 (3 votes) Graham, William Alexander by Max R. Williams, 1986 5 Sept. 1804–11 Aug. 1875 See also: William Alexander Graham [2], Research Branch, NC Office of Archives and History, Portrait of William Alexander Graham by William Garl Browne, circa 1845-1875. Image from the North Carolina Museum of History. [3]William Alexander Graham, lawyer, planter, and governor, was the eleventh child and youngest son of Joseph and Isabella Davidson Graham. He was born on Vesuvius Plantation, the family home in eastern Lincoln County [4]. Both parents were staunch Presbyterians of Scotch-Irish ancestry; their progenitors had migrated first to western Pennsylvania before resettling in the more congenial climate of Mecklenburg County [5]. An iron entrepreneur and sometime public servant, Joseph Graham [6] (1759–1836) had achieved local fame as a young but dedicated Revolutionary officer. Isabella Davidson Graham (1762–1808) was the accomplished daughter of the John Davidsons whose Mecklenburg home, Rural Hill, was renowned as a seat of gracious living. John Davidson [7], himself a Revolutionary patriot, was a substantial farmer and practical blacksmith who, with his sons-in-law Alexander Brevard [8] and Joseph Graham, pioneered the Catawba River valley iron industry [9]. The Grahams and Davidsons were noted for their sagacity, frugality, diligence, and public spirit. William A. Graham embodied these familial traits. Under the supervision of a devoted father, now a widower, young Graham enjoyed the pleasures of a rural boyhood, learned the rudiments of plantation and furnace management, and prepared for a professional career. -
Party Polarization in the U.S. Congress
Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-71768-7 - Party Polarization in Congress Sean M. Theriault Excerpt More information 1 Party Polarization in the U.S. Congress One year to the date after the Supreme Court’s Bush v. Gore decision brought the 2000 presidential election to an end, the House of Rep- resentatives passed the Help America Vote Act (HAVA). By passing the bill, which authorized $2.65 billion to help localities both update antiquated voting equipment and recruit, hire, and train poll work- ers, House members hoped they had solved the problems that led to the fiasco in Florida. Three hundred and sixty-two legislators, which included substantial majorities of both parties, voted for the bill’s final passage; only 20 Republicans and 43 Democrats voted against it. Congressional observers and the American public may have been surprised to see the House, an institution criticized for being trapped in partisan warfare, find a bipartisan solution to one of the most highly partisan episodes in American history. Indeed, Democrats and Repub- licans alike praised House Administration Committee Chair Bob Ney and Ranking Member Steny Hoyer for working together to insure that future ballots are properly cast and appropriately counted. Con- gressman Chaka Fattah, a Democrat on the committee, offered the following assessment during floor debate: “I want to thank Chairman Ney, who I think has exhibited extraordinary leadership in moving this forward, and Ranking Member Hoyer, [for] bringing together a bipartisan group of people.”1 1 Congress, House of Representatives, 107th Congress, 1st session, Congressional Record (12 December 2001): H9290. -
Graham Residence Hall
Graham Residence Hall The Board of Trustees of the University of North Carolina named this building in 1928 to honor John Washington Graham, class of 1857.1 Graham: • Commanded Confederate troops who participated in the massacre of fugitive slaves during the 1864 Battle of Plymouth, North Carolina • Established a distinguished career as a lawyer and politician • Championed white supremacy, was likely a member of the Ku Klux Klan, and in 1872 sponsored legislation that granted Klansmen amnesty for crimes committed as members of a secret organization • Supported a state constitutional amendment and 1877 law that effectively excluded Blacks from elective county government • Served on UNC's Board of Trustees from 1876 until his death in 1928 John Washington Graham was born in 1838, the second son of William Alexander and Susannah Washington Graham. The labor of thirty-eight Black women, men, and children enslaved on the Grahams' Orange County farm made the family wealthy and paid the tuition for John's studies at the University of North Carolina. He earned an A.B. degree in 1857, joined the faculty as a Latin tutor in 1858, and in 1860 completed an L.L.B. in preparation to practice law. The university also awarded Graham two honorary degrees, an M.A. in 1859 and an L.L.D. in 1921. Graham served on UNC's Board of Trustees from 1876 until his death in 1928 and was an elected member of its executive committee beginning in 1891.2 Graham's father, William, was a prominent figure in North Carolina politics. He served in the state legislature and the U.S. -
The Executive's Privilege
PAGE PROOF DRAFT – PAGE NUMBERS SUBJECT TO CHANGE 9/18/2020 Duke Law Journal VOLUME 70 OCTOBER 2020 NUMBER 1 THE EXECUTIVE’S PRIVILEGE JONATHAN DAVID SHAUB† ABSTRACT Both the executive branch and Congress claim the final word in oversight disputes. Congress asserts its subpoenas are legally binding. The executive branch claims the final authority to assert executive privilege and, accordingly, to refuse to comply with a subpoena without consequence. These divergent views stem in large part from the relative absence of any judicial precedent, including not a single Supreme Court decision on the privilege in the context of congressional oversight. In that vacuum—unconstrained by precedent—the executive branch has developed a comprehensive theory of executive privilege to support and implement prophylactic doctrines that render Congress largely powerless in oversight disputes. For the first time, this Article sets out the full extent of the executive branch’s doctrine, the various pieces of which have been expressed in OLC opinions, letters to Congress, and court filings. Existing scholarship largely ignores this doctrine and addresses executive privilege on the basis Copyright © 2020 Jonathan David Shaub † Assistant Professor, University of Kentucky J. David Rosenberg College of Law; J.D., Northwestern Pritzker School of Law; B.A., Vanderbilt University. This article concerns congressional oversight disputes on which I worked as an Attorney-Adviser in the Office of Legal Counsel at the U.S. Department of Justice, but none of the information contained in this article is confidential or subject to any claim of privilege. This paper benefitted mightily from numerous conversations with and comments from my OLC colleagues, particularly Amin Aminfar, John Bies, Martine Cicconi, Kirti Datla, Adele El- Khouri, Caroline Flynn, Troy McKenzie, Annie Owens, Matt Roberts, and Shalev Roisman. -
University of Oklahoma Libraries Western History Collections Bob
University of Oklahoma Libraries Western History Collections Bob Burke Autographs of American Leaders Collection Note: Materials marked “on display” are available for viewing in the large glass exhibit cases in Bizzell Memorial Library, first floor, just east of the main elevators. Box 1: Autographs Folder: 1. George Washington. 1st President of the United States, 1789-1797. [on display] 2. John Adams. 2nd President of the United States, 1797-1801. 3. Thomas Jefferson. 3rd President of the United States, 1801-1809; and 2nd Vice President of the United States, 1797-1801. [on display] 4. James Madison. 4th President of the United States, 1809-1817. 5. James Monroe. 5th President of the United States, 1817-1825. 6. John Quincy Adams. 6th President of the United States, 1825-1829. 7. Andrew Jackson. 7th President of the United States, 1829-1837. [on display] 8. Martin Van Buren. 8th President of the United States, 1837-1841; 8th Vice President of the United States, 1833-1837. 9. William Henry Harrison. 9th President of the United States, 1841. [on display] 10. John Tyler. 10th President of the United States, 1841-1845. 11. James Polk. 11th President of the United States, 1845-1849. 12. Zachary Taylor. 12th President of the United States, 1849-1850. 13. Millard Fillmore. 13th President of the United States, 1850-1853; 12th Vice President of the United States, 1849-1850. 14. Franklin Pierce. 14th President of the United States, 1853-1857. [See also Oversized] 15. James Buchanan, Jr. 15th President of the United States, 1857-1861. 16. Abraham Lincoln. 16th President of the United States, 1861-1865. -
North Carolina General Assembly 1969 Session
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY 1969 SESSION RESOLUTION 49 HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 890 A JOINT RESOLUTION HONORING THE LIFE AND MEMORY OF JOHN WASHINGTON CLARK. WHEREAS, John Washington Clark died April 18, 1969, while attending a meeting of the Asheboro Rotary Club, and WHEREAS, a graveside service was held at the Methodist Cemetery in Franklinville on Sunday, April 20, 1969, which was attended by hundreds of citizens of that area and from other parts of the State, an indication of the high esteem in which John Washington Clark was held by people in all walks of life; and WHEREAS, John Washington Clark was born on October 5, 1887, the son of Walter and Susan Washington Clark, and was a member of one of the State's most distinguished families; and WHEREAS, John Washington Clark's father, Judge Walter Clark, was a distinguished North Carolinian, serving for thirty-five years as a Justice on the North Carolina Supreme Court, twenty-one years of which was as Chief Justice; and WHEREAS, Judge Walter Clark suggested the North Carolina motto,"Esse Quam Videri," and drew the bill which placed this motto on the Great Seal of the State of North Carolina; and WHEREAS, John Washington Clark's maternal grandfather was W.A. Graham, who served as Governor of North Carolina for two terms from January 1, 1845 to January 1, 1849, and who also served as a United States Senator; and WHEREAS, John Washington Clark's father, Chief Justice Walter Clark, was a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and sincerely believed in a technical education and therefore enrolled each of his five sons at North Carolina College of Agriculture and Mechanical Arts; and WHEREAS, John Washington Clark and his four brothers earned a total of nine degrees at North Carolina College of Agriculture and Mechanical Arts; and WHEREAS, each of John Washington Clark's four brothers have had distinguished careers. -
A Place for Walter Clark in the American Judicial Tradition Willis P
NORTH CAROLINA LAW REVIEW Volume 63 | Number 2 Article 2 1-1-1985 A Place for Walter Clark in the American Judicial Tradition Willis P. Whichard Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Willis P. Whichard, A Place for Walter Clark in the American Judicial Tradition, 63 N.C. L. Rev. 287 (1985). Available at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr/vol63/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Law Review by an authorized administrator of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A PLACE FOR WALTER CLARK IN THE AMERICAN JUDICIAL TRADITION WILLIS P. WHICHARDt Walter Clark, ChiefJustice of the North CarolinaSupreme Court from 1903 to 1924, is a preeminentfigure in North Carolinajurispru- dence. A forerunner in many ways, Clark was an early advocatefor such causes as women's suffrage and child labor laws. In this Article Judge Whichardreviews the evidence on Clark'sjudicialand personal life, and evaluates earlier biographicaltreatment of Clark. Although Clark died over sixty years ago, there still is no consensus on the merits of his contributions. Clark's stature as one of the most influential judges in the history of the State and the Nation, however, is undeniable. A hemlock shades an inconspicuous grave in Raleigh's Oakwood Ceme- tary. The marker reads: WALTER CLARK CHIEF JUSTICE BORN 19 AUGUST 1846 DIED 19 MAY 19241 t Associate Judge, North Carolina Court of Appeals. -
Party Polarization in the US Congress
Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-88893-6 - Party Polarization in Congress Sean M. Theriault Excerpt More information 1 Party Polarization in the U.S. Congress One year to the date after the Supreme Court’s Bush v. Gore decision brought the 2000 presidential election to an end, the House of Rep- resentatives passed the Help America Vote Act (HAVA). By passing the bill, which authorized $2.65 billion to help localities both update antiquated voting equipment and recruit, hire, and train poll work- ers, House members hoped they had solved the problems that led to the fiasco in Florida. Three hundred and sixty-two legislators, which included substantial majorities of both parties, voted for the bill’s final passage; only 20 Republicans and 43 Democrats voted against it. Congressional observers and the American public may have been surprised to see the House, an institution criticized for being trapped in partisan warfare, find a bipartisan solution to one of the most highly partisan episodes in American history. Indeed, Democrats and Repub- licans alike praised House Administration Committee Chair Bob Ney and Ranking Member Steny Hoyer for working together to insure that future ballots are properly cast and appropriately counted. Con- gressman Chaka Fattah, a Democrat on the committee, offered the following assessment during floor debate: “I want to thank Chairman Ney, who I think has exhibited extraordinary leadership in moving this forward, and Ranking Member Hoyer, [for] bringing together a bipartisan group of people.”1 1 Congress, House of Representatives, 107th Congress, 1st session, Congressional Record (12 December 2001): H9290. -
Lid L(O'l ~.C.Il!> Cf6olfml Tf:~E.L ~
g. e, ~· ; o , .....I f·;;;t e II· r7buth/ ~u,po-d7ta-j/ .. .. LiD l(o'L ~.C.Il!> Cf6olfml tf:~e.l ~ JOHN C. CALHOUN STATUE IN STATE HOUSE LOBBY S. C ST~TE PRP~RY BOARD Published by the S. C. State Library Prepared by Emily Bellinger Reynolds, Former State Librarian and Joan Reynolds Faunt, State Librarian 1966 After the surrender of Columbia on February 17, the city was almost totally destroyed by fire . Among SOUTH CAROLINA'S the buildings burned was the old State House. The quoin-stones and basement cornices at the STATE HOUSE southwestern comer of the new building crumbled South Carolina's handsome State House, constructed off three or four inches from the heat of the burning old building, according to Niernsee's report to the of native granite in Roman Corinthian style, ante legislature in 1865. The architect's plans, drawings, dates the Confederate War. The building was begun specifications, and all other records "were utterly in 1855 and the cornerstone laid June 9, 1856. swept away during that terrible night." The former State House was first occupied in De After the post-war reorganization of the state gov cember, 1789, when the capital was removed to ernment, the General Assembly, which had been Columbia from Charleston, the seat of provincial and meeting on the campus of the South Carolina College state government since 1670. Its architect was James (now the University of South Carolina), again turned Hoban, a young Irishman who later designed the its attention to completing the State House. Governor executive mansion in Washington.