DOCSLIB.ORG

In Carsten Jensen's Memory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In Carsten Jensen's Memory Science Networks • Historical Studies Volume 24 Edited by Erwin Hiebert, Eberhard Knobloch and Erhard Scholz Editorial Board: K. Andersen, Aarhus R. Halleux, Liege D. Barkan, Pasadena S. Hildebrandt, Bonn H.J.M. Bos, Utrecht D. Laugwitz, Muhltal U. Bottazzini, Roma Ch. Meinel, Regensburg J.Z. Buchwald, Cambridge, Mass. J. Peiffer, Paris K. Chemla, Paris W. Purkert, Leipzig 5.5. Demidov, Moskva D. Rowe, Mainz E.A. Fellmann, Basel A.1. Sabra, Cambridge, Mass. M. Folkerts, Munchen R.H. Stuewer, Minneapolis P. Galison, Cambridge, Mass. H. WuBing, Leipzig I. Grattan-Guinness, London V.P. Vizgin, Moskva J. Gray, Milton Keynes Carsten Jensen t Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911-1934 Editors: Finn Aaserud Helge Kragh Erik RCtdinger Roger H. 5tuewer Springer Basel AG Editors: Finn Aaserud Helge Kragh Niels Bohr Archive Dept. of History of Science Blegdamsvej 17 University of Aarhus DK-2100 Copenhagen DK-8000 Aarhus C Denmark Denmark email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Erik ROdinger Roger H. Stuewer Hyldebakken 9 Tate Laboratory of Physics DK-3070 Snekkersten University of Minnesota Denmark 116 Church Street SE email: [email protected] Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA email: [email protected] A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the Library of Congress, Washington D.C., USA Deutsche Bibliothek Cataloging-in-Publication Data Jensen, Carsten: Controversy and consensus: nuclear beta decay 1911-1934/ Carsten Jensen. Ed.: Finn Aaserud ... - Basel ; Boston; Berlin: Birkhăuser, 2000 (Science networks ; VoI. 24) ISBN 978-3-0348-9569-9 ISBN 978-3-0348-8444-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-0348-8444-0 ISBN 978-3-0348-9569-9 This work is subject to copyright. AII rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, re-use of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in other ways, and storage in data banks. For any kind of use, permission of the copyright owner must be obtained. © 2000 Springer Basel AG Originally published by Birkhăuser Verlag in 2000 Softcover reprint of the hardcover lst edition 2000 Camera-ready copy prepared by the editors. Cover Design: Micha Lotrovsky, Therwil, Switzerland Cover illustration: Lisa Meitner (by courtesy of Lotte Meitner-Graf) and Charles Drummond Ellis (by courtesy of Cambridge University Library) Printed on acid-free paper produced from chlorine-free pulp. TCF 00 ISBN 978-3-0348-9569-9 987654321 For Thomas: may he conserve his energy - but only statistically. In Carsten Jensen's Memory Since Carsten Jensen was my one and only Ph.D. student (I have since changed to other work), my coeditors have kindly accorded me the privilege of writing a few words in his memory. I first met Carsten when he attended my course on the history of quantum mechanics for 3rd year students at the University of Copenhagen. He passed with an excellent mark and shortly afterwards he turned to me because he wanted to write a historical paper in his course on atomic physics. Quite frankly, the thought crossed my mind that this was perhaps a student looking for a "soft option" . I was soon to learn otherwise. Carsten's paper discussed the hydrogen molecule ion as dealt with in the old quantum theory as well as in quantum mechanics, including the historically interesting case of an electron in an electric dipole field. After completing this paper, Carsten had clearly decided on the history of physics as his field of specialization. He decided to write his master's thesis on "Some Experimental Anomalies in the Old Quantum Mechanics". Also this work earned him a very high mark; it was later published, in slightly revised form, as "Two One-Electron Anomalies in the Old Quantum Theory" (Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 15 (1984), 73-90). I had by now come to appreciate the very high quality of Carsten's work so when he approached me again and asked me to be his supervisor for his Ph.D. dissertation, I accepted with pleasure. He first chose a broad theme within a rather brief period (the transition from atomic to nuclear physics, 1926 to 1932), but soon settled on a more limited topic over a longer period - the subject of the present book. In the spring of 1990, Carsten was awarded the Ph.D. for his very successful dissertation. A few months later he died of cancer at the age of 41. The editors have felt that this brilliant study ought to be known to scientists, historians and others interested in the topic, and have therefore prepared the present, slightly edited, version of Carsten Jensen's work for publication. The resulting book testifies to the loss that the history of science suffered by Carsten's early death. We, his friends and colleagues, will remember him above all for his kind and gentle personality, his disarming smile and his great sense of humour. Fortunately, a little of the latter is preserved in his style of writing, and hence in the present work. Erik Riidinger Editors' Acknowledgements Several individuals and institutions have taken part in the long process of editing Carsten Jensen's dissertation and otherwise making it ready for publication. We are grateful to professor emeritus Hilde Levi for her improvement of the editors' translations of quotations from German into English, and to the late pro­ fessor Allan Mackintosh for reading the manuscript for content and suggesting improvements in language. Anne Lis Rasmussen, secretary/librarian at the Niels Bohr Archive, spent months editing the manuscript on computer, introducing of­ ten complex ~1EX commands. She also entered the index terms and obtained sometimes obscure publications from which she scanned the numerous figures in the book. This work was made possible through financial support from the Foun­ dation of the Niels Bohr Institute (Niels Bohr lnstitutets Fond) and the Niels Bohr Fund (Niels Bohr Legatet). We thank the Niels Bohr Institute for use of computer facilities. Peter Harper, director of the National Cataloguing Center for the Archives of Contemporary Scientists in Bath, England, helped obtaining the first names of some of the less well-known scientists mentioned in the book. Felicity Pors, academic assistant at the Niels Bohr Archive, checked the manuscript in the very last stages. We have sought to make a conscientious effort to secure permissions to quote from unpublished material and to reproduce figures from publications. For help in improving the references to published material, as well as locating permission hold­ ers, we wish to thank, in particular: Carolyn Lye at the Churchill College Archives Centre; Adam Perkins at the Cambridge University Library; Mary Sampson at the Royal Society Archives; Margaret Kimball at the Stanford University Archives; and Marion Kazemi at the Archiv zur Geschichte der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft. For permission to quote from unpublished letters, we wish to thank the fol­ lowing: N.M. Blackett (letters of P.M.S. Blackett); George Bloch (letters of Felix Bloch); Mrs. J. Batterham and Miss J. Chadwick (letters of James Chadwick); Charles E. Miller (letters of P.A.M. Dirac); Stefan S. Fajans (letters of Kasimir Fajans); Mary Nisbet (letters of Ernest Rutherford and Ralph Fowler); R. Igor and Elfriede Gamow (letters of George Gamow); Klaus Geiger (letters of Hans Geiger); Dietrich Hahn (letters of Otto Hahn); Elisabeth Heisenberg (letters of Werner Heisenberg); Martien Kramers (letters of H.A. Kramers); Ulla E. Frisch (letters of Lise Meitner); Roswitha Rahmy, for the Pauli Committee (letters of Wolfgang Pauli); 0ystein Elgar0y (letters of Svein Rosseland); Ruth Braunizer (letters of Erwin Schrodinger); Helmuth Smekal (letters of Adolf Smekal); Walter Thirring (letters of Hans Thirring); and the Niels Bohr Archive (letters of Niels viii Editors' Acknowledgements Bohr). We have been unable to find the copyright holders of the letters of Ernest Marsden as well as of the letters of Charles Drummond Ellis, one of the main characters in the book. All figures originally appearing in Carsten Jensen's dissertation have been retained. For permission to reprint them, we thank the following: S. Hirzel Ver­ lag (reproductions from Physikalische Zeitschrift); Addison Wesley Longman Ltd. (reproductions from W.E. Burcham, Nuclear Physics: An Introduction (Longmans Green and Co. Ltd., London, 1965)); American Association of Physics Teach­ ers (reproductions from American Journal of Physics); EDP Sciences (repro­ duction from Annales de Chimie et de Physique); Cambridge University Press (reproductions-and quotations-from Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosoph­ ical Society; E. Rutherford, Radio-Activity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1904); and idem., Radioactive Substances and Their Radiations (Cam­ bridge: Cambridge University Press, 1913)); Taylor and Francis (reproductions­ and quotations-from Philosophical Magazine); American Physical Society (re­ productions-and quotations-from Physical Review); The Royal Society (repro­ ductions from Proceedings of the Royal Society); Springer Verlag (reproductions­ and quotations-from Zeitschrift fUr Physik); and Deutsche Physikalische Gesell­ schaft (reproductions-and quotation-from Verhandlungen der Deutschen Phys­ ikalischen Gesellschaft). The frontispiece photo of Carsten Jensen, as well as the photographs in Fig­ ures 1.7, 1.12, 2.1, 3.1, 3.4, 3.8, 6.1, and 6.8, have been added to the original manuscript by the editors. Most of these photographs stem from the photograph collection of the Niels Bohr Archive. We also thank Ingelise Christensen and the Cambridge University Library for providing, respectively, the frontispiece photo and the portrait of C.D. Ellis (Figure 3.1). We furthermore thank the Deutsches Museum for supplying the photograph of Otto Hahn and Lise Meitner (Figure 3.4) as well as the photograph of the beta-ray spectroscope and the beta spectrometer (Figure 1.12). The Rome conference photo (Figure 6.1) is from the Emilio Segre Collection in the Niels Bohr Library of the American Institute of Physics, whereas the Solvay conference photo (Figure 6.8) is owned by the Institut international de physique Solvay.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vorwort (PDF, 289
    JOST LEMMERICH AUFRECHT IM STURM DER ZEIT DER PHYSIKER JAMES FRANCK 1882 – 1964 DIEPHOlz · STUTTGART · BERLIN 2007 VERlaG FÜR GESCHICHTE DER NaTURWISSENSCHAFTEN UND DER TECHNIK www.gnt­verlag.de ISBN 978­3­928186­83­4 Printed in Germany. Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Vorwort und Danksagung Die Biographien über Physiker weisen nicht übersehbare Häufungen bei einigen Na­ men auf. Die Anzahl der Einsteinbiographien übersteigt sicher die Zahl 100. Auch über das Leben von Galilei und Newton sind zahlreiche Bücher geschrieben worden. In den letzten Jahren sind mehrere Biographien über Lise Meitner und neuerdings über Heisenberg erschienen. Sieht man von kürzeren Nachrufen ab, so liegen für sehr viele bedeutende Physiker des 20. Jahrhunderts bisher keine ausführlichen Biographien vor, wie zum Beispiel Patrick M. S. Blackett, Walther Bothe, Gustav Hertz, Viktor F. Hess, Max von Laue, Walther Nernst, Johannes Stark, Otto Stern, Fritz Zernike, um nur ei­ nige der Nobelpreisträger der Physik zu nennen. Ebenso sind die in den Zwanziger Jahren bedeutenden Göttinger Physiker James Franck und Robert W. Pohl nicht mit Biographien gewürdigt worden. Von Max Born liegt eine Autobiographie vor und 2005 erschien eine Biographie von Nancy Th. Greenspan. In den Fünfziger Jahren entschloss sich Johannes Jaenicke, ein enger Mitarbeiter Fritz Habers, Vorarbeiten zu einer Haber­Biographie aufzunehmen und fragte die Freunde Habers, wie James Franck, und Mitarbeiter Habers nach Erinnerungen und Beiträgen. Als Franck 1958 in Deutschland zu Besuch war, interviewte Jaenicke ihn. Die dabei gemachten Äußerungen können vielleicht als die Vorstellungen Francks zu seiner Bio­ graphie verstanden werden:1 »Es gibt verschiedene Möglichkeiten, diese Biographie zu schreiben. Wenn Sie [Jaenicke] über die wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten nicht selbst schreiben, sondern Beiträge von verschiedenen Leuten bringen wollen, gibt es so eine Art Sammelheft, wie man sie Lebenden zu Geburtstagen zu widmen pflegt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nobel Laureate George De Hevesy (1885-1966) - Universal Genius and Father of Nuclear Medicine Niese S* Am Silberblick 9, 01723 Wilsdruff, Germany
    Open Access SAJ Biotechnology LETTER ISSN: 2375-6713 The Nobel Laureate George de Hevesy (1885-1966) - Universal Genius and Father of Nuclear Medicine Niese S* Am Silberblick 9, 01723 Wilsdruff, Germany *Corresponding author: Niese S, Am Silberblick 9, 01723 Wilsdruff, Germany, Tel: +49 35209 22849, E-mail: [email protected] Citation: Niese S, The Nobel Laureate George de Hevesy (1885-1966) - Universal Genius and Father of Nuclear Medicine. SAJ Biotechnol 5: 102 Article history: Received: 20 March 2018, Accepted: 29 March 2018, Published: 03 April 2018 Abstract The scientific work of the universal genius the Nobel Laureate George de Hevesy who has discovered and developed news in physics, chemistry, geology, biology and medicine is described. Special attention is given to his work in life science which he had done in the second half of his scientific career and was the base of the development of nuclear medicine. Keywords: George de Hevesy; Radionuclides; Nuclear Medicine Introduction George de Hevesy has founded Radioanalytical Chemistry and Nuclear Medicine, discovered the element hafnium and first separated stable isotopes. He was an inventor in many disciplines and his interest was not only focused on the development and refinement of methods, but also on the structure of matter and its changes: atoms, molecules, cells, organs, plants, animals, men and cosmic objects. He was working under complicated political situation in Europe in the 20th century. During his stay in Germany, Austria, Hungary, Switzerland, Denmark, and Sweden he wrote a lot papers in German. In 1962 he edited a large part of his articles in a collection where German papers are translated in English [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Daniele Montanino Università Del Salento & INFN
    Daniele Montanino Università del Salento & INFN Suggested readings Notice that an exterminated number of (pedagogical and technical) articles, reviews, books, internet pages… can be found on the subject of Neutrino (Astro)Physics. To avoid an “overload” of readings, here I have listed just a very few number of articles and books which (probably) are not the most representative of the subject. Pedagogical introductions on neutrino physics and oscillations: • “TASI lectures on neutrino physics”, A. de Gouvea, hep-ph/0411274 • “Celebrating the neutrino” Los Alamos Science n°25, 1997 (old but still good), http://library.lanl.gov/cgi-bin/getfile?number25.htm • Dubna lectures by V. Naumov, http://theor.jinr.ru/~vnaumov/ Recent reviews: • “Neutrino masses and mixings and…”, A. Strumia & F. Vissani, hep-ph/0606054 • “Global analysis of three-flavor neutrino masses and mixings”, G.L. Fogli et al., Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 57 742 (2006), hep-ph/0506083 Books: • “Massive Neutrinos in Physics and Astrophysics”, R. Mohapatra & P. Pal, World Scientific Lecture Notes in Physics - Vol. 72 • “Physics of Neutrinos”, M. Fukugita & T. Yanagida, Springer Links: • “The neutrino unbound”, by C. Giunti & M. Laveder, http://www.nu.to.infn.it/ A NEUTRINO TIMELINE 1927 Charles Drummond Ellis (along with James Chadwick and colleagues) establishes clearly that the beta decay spectrum is really continous, ending all controversies. 1930 Wolfgang Pauli hypothesizes the existence of neutrinos to account for the beta decay energy conservation crisis. 1932 Chadwick discovers the neutron. 1933 Enrico Fermi writes down the correct theory for beta decay, incorporating the neutrino. 1937 Majorana introduced the so-called Majorana neutrino hypothesis in which neutrinos and antineutrinos are considered the same particle.
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of Vague Ideas in the Development of the Periodic System of Chemical Elements
    The Value of Vague Ideas in the Development of the Periodic System of Chemical Elements. Thomas Vogt Departments of Chemistry & Biochemistry and Philosophy University of South Carolina Abstract The exploration of chemical periodicity over the past 250 years led to the development of the Periodic System of Elements and demonstrates the value of vague ideas that ignored early scientific anomalies and instead allowed for extended periods of normal science where new methodologies and concepts are developed. The basic chemical element provides this exploration with direction and explanation and has shown to be a central and historically adaptable concept for a theory of matter far from the reductionist frontier. This is explored in the histories of Prout’s hypothesis, Döbereiner Triads, element inversions necessary when ordering chemical elements by atomic weights, and van den Broeck’s ad-hoc proposal to switch to nuclear charges instead. The development of more accurate methods to determine atomic weights, Rayleigh and Ramsey’s gas separation and analytical techniques, Moseley’s x-ray spectroscopy to identify chemical elements, and more recent accelerator-based cold fusion methods to create new elements at the end of the Periodic Table point to the importance of methodological development complementing conceptual advances. I propose to frame the crossover from physics to chemistry not as a loss of accuracy and precision but as an increased application of vague concepts such as similarity which permit classification. This approach provides epistemic flexibility to adapt to scientific anomalies and the continued growth of chemical compound space and rejects the Procrustean philosophy of reductionist physics. Furthermore, it establishes chemistry with its explanatory and operational autonomy epitomized by the periodic system of elements as a gateway to other experimental sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the James Franck Papers 1882-1966
    University of Chicago Library Guide to the James Franck Papers 1882-1966 © 2006 University of Chicago Library Table of Contents Acknowledgments 3 Descriptive Summary 3 Information on Use 3 Access 3 Citation 3 Biographical Note 4 Scope Note 15 Related Resources 21 Subject Headings 21 INVENTORY 22 Series I: Correspondence 22 Series II: Manuscripts 51 Subseries 1: Physics - work in Germany and Denmark, 1905-1934 51 Subseries 2: Physics - work in United States, 1935-1958 53 Subseries 3: Biophysics - work on Photosynthesis at Johns Hopkins, 1935-193855 Subseries 4: Biophysics - work on Photosynthesis at the University of Chicago,55 1938-48 Subseries 5: Biophysics - work on Photosynthesis after 1948 55 Subseries 6: General Articles and Talks on Science 71 Subseries 7: Papers by other scientists 72 Subseries 8: Notes, memoranda and fragments 76 Subseries 9: Atomic Scientists' Movement, 1944-1953 76 Subseries 10: Franck Memorial Symposium, May 12-13, 1966 79 Series III: Tape Recordings and Photographs 80 Subseries 1: Tape recordings 80 Subseries 2: Hertha Sponer's photograph album, Göttingen, 1920-1933 80 Series IV: Personal Documents and Memorabilia 90 Subseries 1: Documents 90 Subseries 2: Clippings 93 Subseries 3: Biographies and Obituaries 94 Subseries 4: Memorabilia; Scrolls, Certificates, Medals, Mementos 96 Series V: Robert Platzman's Editorial Papers for the "Selected Works of James98 Franck" Series VI: Addenda 103 Subseries 1: Correspondence between James Franck and his nephew and Dr. Heinz104 Kallman Subseries 2: Oversize 105 Descriptive Summary Identifier ICU.SPCL.FRANCK Title Franck, James. Papers Date 1882-1966 Size 20.5 linear feet (29 boxes) Repository Special Collections Research Center University of Chicago Library 1100 East 57th Street Chicago, Illinois 60637 U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • As Etapas Rumo À Bomba Atômica
    O maravilhoso ano de 1932 Cauê Priscila Suzana Poucos Físicos interessados 1900 •Planck 1913 •Bohr A partir de 1913 o interesse pelos estudos da Física Moderna aumentou 1928 • Dirac – Sensação de que havia se atingido um ponto crítico na física. • Corbino, Roma, (Enrico Fermi e Enrico Persico),incentivo a ciência na Itália, 1929 Palestra “As Novas Metas para Física” • Física Atomica – “Campo promissor para os físicos teóricos e experimentais” • Emilio Segre – Era uma época que precisa “atacar” o núcleo. • Era preciso de uma nova ideia. • Atomos tinham apenae elétrons e prótons (nucleo de H) • As Descobertas em 1932 era tão importantes quanto as de 1865 • Neutrons • Deutério • Pósitron • Aceleradores • Teoria dos Raios β • Radioatividade artificials A descoberta do neutron • 2 anos. • Rutherford ja tinha a ideia duma particula sem carga. (Conferencia de Baker)1920 • 1928 – Walter Boethe • Be→α(Po) com H tambem. • Libera “raios gama”, de Energia alta. • Raios penetrantes. A descoberta do neutron • Irene Curie e Frederic Jolit • Refizeram utilizando amostras de polono extremamente forte. • Conseguindo ejetar eletrons da camada de parafina. • Efeito Compton, os “raios gama” deveriam ter seção de choque altissima energia. A descoberta do neutron • Chadwick(Cavendish)– Rutherford. • Chawick: refez o experimento (He e N) • Concluiu que a radiaçao penetrante tinha comportamento neutro, e chamou de NEUTRON. • Publicou e ganhou o Nobel. • Portas Abertas para outras particulas. Descoberta do Deutério • Harold Clayton Urey • 29 abril 1893 - 1981 • Quimico • Orientador: Gilbert Newton Lewis • Conhericdo por Deutério, experiência de Urey-Miller • Premios: Nobel de Quimica (1934) Deutério • Isótopo de Hidrogênio de massa 2 • Núcleo formado por um próton e um nêutron • separaram do hidrogênio por destilação fracionada a -259°C.
    [Show full text]
  • William A. Arnold 1904–2001
    William A. Arnold 1904–2001 A Biographical Memoir by Govindjee and Nupur Srivastava ©2014 National Academy of Sciences. Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. WILLIAM ARCHIBALD ARNOLD December 6, 1904 – October 26, 2001 Elected to the NAS, 1962 William Arnold—Bill, to all who knew him—was a plant physiologist, physicist, and biologist all in one and a researcher of the highest order in each field. His achieve- ments read like a march of scientific progress. He discov- ered what came to be called the photosynthetic unit, with Robert Emerson, in 1932. He made the first reliable measurements, in his 1935 Harvard Ph.D. dissertation, of the minimum quantum requirement for the evolution of an oxygen molecule. In 1951, together with J. Robert Oppenheimer, he made critical suggestions on the mech- anism of excitation energy transfer in photosynthesis. William Arnold. the family of of Photo courtesy With Bernard Strehler in that same year he discovered delayed light emission (DLE) in photosynthetic organisms. He made the first measurements of excitation energy By Govindjee migration by depolarization of fluorescence, with Eleanor and Nupur Srivastava Meek in 1956. He discovered thermoluminescence in chloroplasts, with Helen Sherwood in 1957. He elucidated the primary photochemical reactions at the photosynthetic reaction center down to 1K with Rod Clayton in 1960. Bill discovered the presence of electroluminescence, also in chloroplasts, with Jim Azzi in 1971. As this list suggests, Bill Arnold was one of the founding fathers of our under- standing of the physical basis for photosynthesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Science, Scientific Intellectuals and British Culture in the Early Atomic Age, 1945-1956: a Case Study of George Orwell, Jacob Bronowski, J.G
    Science, Scientific Intellectuals and British Culture in The Early Atomic Age, 1945-1956: A Case Study of George Orwell, Jacob Bronowski, J.G. Crowther and P.M.S. Blackett Ralph John Desmarais A Dissertation Submitted In Fulfilment Of The Requirements For The Degree Of Doctor Of Philosophy Imperial College London Centre For The History Of Science, Technology And Medicine 2 Abstract This dissertation proposes a revised understanding of the place of science in British literary and political culture during the early atomic era. It builds on recent scholarship that discards the cultural pessimism and alleged ‘two-cultures’ dichotomy which underlay earlier histories. Countering influential narratives centred on a beleaguered radical scientific Left in decline, this account instead recovers an early postwar Britain whose intellectual milieu was politically heterogeneous and culturally vibrant. It argues for different and unrecognised currents of science and society that informed the debates of the atomic age, most of which remain unknown to historians. Following a contextual overview of British scientific intellectuals active in mid-century, this dissertation then considers four individuals and episodes in greater detail. The first shows how science and scientific intellectuals were intimately bound up with George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty Four (1949). Contrary to interpretations portraying Orwell as hostile to science, Orwell in fact came to side with the views of the scientific rig h t through his active wartime interest in scientists’ doctrinal disputes; this interest, in turn, contributed to his depiction of Ingsoc, the novel’s central fictional ideology. Jacob Bronowski’s remarkable transition from pre-war academic mathematician and Modernist poet to a leading postwar BBC media don is then traced.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Copenhagen, Denmark
    Lorenz, electromagnetism, and the theory of telephone currents Kragh, Helge Stjernholm Publication date: 2016 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (APA): Kragh, H. S. (2016, Jun 2). Lorenz, electromagnetism, and the theory of telephone currents. http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.00205 Download date: 24. Sep. 2021 1 Ludvig Lorenz, Electromagnetism, and the Theory of Telephone Currents Helge Kragh Abstract: Ludvig V. Lorenz (1829-1891) was Denmark’s first theoretical physicist and the only one whose work attracted international attention in the second half of the nineteenth century. This paper presents a survey of Lorenz’s contributions to physics with an emphasis on his work in electrodynamics and electrical science. His 1867 electrodynamic theory of light was of a theoretical and foundational nature, while his unpublished theory of telephone currents was oriented toward practical problems in long-distance telephony. Lorenz’s theories are briefly compared to those of better known physicists such as H. A. Lorentz, J. C. Maxwell, and O. Heaviside. The Danish nineteen-century physicist Ludvig V. Lorenz is not well known today (and is sometimes confused with the famous Dutch physicist Hendrik A. Lorentz). Yet his life and contributions to physics are described in, for example, the Dictionary of Scientific Biography and several other sources in the history of science literature [e.g. Pihl 1939; Pihl 1972; Kragh 1991]. A French translation of Lorenz’s collected papers was published by the mathematician Herman Valentiner in two valuable but somewhat obscure volumes [Valentiner 1898-1904]. Leading physicists in the second half of the nineteenth century were aware of his work and often referred to it.
    [Show full text]
  • Von Atomen Zu Teilchen
    Einfuhrung¨ in die Teilchenphysik Kapitel 1: Von Atomen zu Teilchen Walter Grimus Fakult¨at fur¨ Physik, Universit¨at Wien Boltzmanngasse 5, A{1090 Wien 2017W 1 Definitionen und Abkurzungen¨ mp = Masse des Protons, mn = Masse des Neutrons, me = Masse des Elektrons (Z; A): Kern mit Ordnungszahl Z und Massenzahl A 2 1 Von Atomen zu Teilchen 1.1 Strahlung und Radioaktivit¨at • November 1895 Conrad Wilhelm R¨ontgen entdeckt die X-Strahlen\ (R¨ontgen- " Strahlen) mit Hilfe einer Kathodenstrahlr¨ohre. Was passierte zwischen 1.3.1896 (Entdeckung der Radioaktivit¨at) und 4.12.1930 (Paulis Neutrino-Hypothese)? Siehe A. Pais [1] (siehe auch [2, 3]). • 1. M¨arz1896 Entdeckung der Uran-Strahlen\ durch Henri Becquerel (sp¨ater Ra- " dioaktivit¨at genannt). Becquerel untersucht Idee, dass X-Strahlen mit Phospho- reszenz zusammenh¨angen; Sonnenlicht zur Anregung von Kaliumuranyldisulphat (K2UO2(SO4)2·2H2O) zu Phosphoreszenz; Photoplatten zeigen jedoch Umriss des Minerals auch ohne vorherige Sonnenbestrahlung ! Effekt kommt vom Uran, h¨angt nicht mit spezieller U-Verbindung zusammen. • 1897 Entdeckung des Elektrons: { 1896 Arbeiten von Pieter Zeeman: Aufspaltung von Spektrallinien im Ma- gnetfeld ! Effekt durch Bewegung eines Ions\ im Atom mit e=m ∼ 103 × " (e=m)jH+ . { 7.1.1897 Erste Aussage uber¨ die Existenz eines subatomaren Teilchens durch Johann Emil Wiechert in einem Vortrag in K¨onigsberg: Kathodenstrahlen ! Teilchen mit Masse 2000 bis 4000 Mal kleiner als der des H-Atoms. { April 1897 Bestimmung von e=m aus Kathodenstrahlen durch Walter Kauf- mann in Berlin. { 30.4.1897 Vortrag von Joseph John Thomson in London: gute Bestimmung von e=m aus Kathodenstrahlen.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Group NEWSLETTER and SUMMARY of PAPERS
    Historical Group NEWSLETTER and SUMMARY OF PAPERS No. 76 Summer 2019 Registered Charity No. 207890 COMMITTEE Chairman: Dr Peter J T Morris Dr Christopher J Cooksey (Watford, 5 Helford Way, Upminster, Essex RM14 1RJ Hertfordshire) [e-mail: [email protected]] Prof Alan T Dronsfield (Swanwick) Secretary: Prof. John W Nicholson Dr John A Hudson (Cockermouth) 52 Buckingham Road, Hampton, Middlesex, Prof Frank James (Royal Institution) TW12 3JG [e-mail: [email protected]] Dr Michael Jewess (Harwell, Oxon) Membership Prof Bill P Griffith Dr Fred Parrett (Bromley, London) Secretary: Department of Chemistry, Imperial College, Prof Henry Rzepa (Imperial College) London, SW7 2AZ [e-mail: [email protected]] Treasurer: Prof Richard Buscall Exeter, Devon [e-mail: [email protected]] Newsletter Dr Anna Simmons Editor Epsom Lodge, La Grande Route de St Jean, St John, Jersey, JE3 4FL [e-mail: [email protected]] Newsletter Dr Gerry P Moss Production: School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS [e-mail: [email protected]] https://www.qmul.ac.uk/sbcs/rschg/ http://www.rsc.org/historical/ 1 Contents From the Editor (Anna Simmons) 2 RSC HISTORICAL GROUP JOINT AUTUMN MEETING 3 William Crookes (1832-1919) 3 RSC HISTORICAL GROUP NEWS 4 Secretary’s Report for 2018 (John Nicholson) 4 MEMBERS’ PUBLICATIONS 4 PUBLICATIONS OF INTEREST 4 NEWS FROM CATALYST (Alan Dronsfield) 5 FORTHCOMING EXHIBITIONS 6 SOCIETY NEWS 6 OTHER NEWS 6 SHORT ESSAYS 7 How Group VIII Elements Posed a Problem for Mendeleev (Bill Griffith) 7 Norium, Mnemonics and Mackay (William.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lorenz-Lorentz Formula: Origin and Early History Citation: H
    Firenze University Press www.fupress.com/substantia Feature Article The Lorenz-Lorentz Formula: Origin and Early History Citation: H. Kragh (2018) The Lorenz- Lorentz Formula: Origin and Early History. Substantia 2(2): 7-18. doi: 10.13128/substantia-56 Helge Kragh Copyright: © 2018 H. Kragh. This is Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 17, Copenhagen, Denmark an open access, peer-reviewed article E-mail: [email protected] published by Firenze University Press (http://www.fupress.com/substantia) and distribuited under the terms of the Abstract. Among the many eponymous formulae and laws met in textbooks in physics Creative Commons Attribution License, and chemistry, the Lorenz-Lorentz formula merits attention from a historical point of which permits unrestricted use, distri- view. The somewhat curious name of this formula, which relates the refractive index bution, and reproduction in any medi- of a substance to its density, reflects its dual origin in two areas of nineteenth-century um, provided the original author and physics, namely optics and electromagnetism. Although usually dated to 1880, the for- source are credited. mula was first established in 1869 by L. V. Lorenz (optics) and subsequently in 1878 Data Availability Statement: All rel- by H. A. Lorentz (electromagnetism). Apart from discussing the origin and priority of evant data are within the paper and its the Lorenz-Lorentz formula the paper outlines its early use in molecular physics and Supporting Information files. physical chemistry. During the late nineteenth century studies of molecular refractiv- ity based on the formula proved important in a number of ways. For example, they led Competing Interests: The Author(s) to estimates of the size of molecules and provided information about the structure of declare(s) no conflict of interest.
    [Show full text]