DOCSLIB.ORG

Part II 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Part II 2019 NST2HP Natural Sciences Tripos Part II: History and Philosophy of Science Monday 3 June 2019 09.00–12.00 Paper 1 Early History of Science, Medicine and Technology You should answer four questions in total. Answer one question from Section A and three questions from Section B. All questions carry equal weighting. Begin each answer on a separate sheet. Write legibly and on only one side of the paper. Answers must be tied up in separate bundles, marked 1, 2, 3, etc. according to the number of the question. Attach a completed coversheet to each bundle and complete a master coversheet listing all questions attempted. It is essential that you write your examination number and not your name on the coversheet and on each bundle. You may not start to read the questions printed on the subsequent pages of this question paper until instructed to do so by the invigilator. Page 1 of 2 SECTION A 1. How did increased contact between Europe and other continents change European natural knowledge? 2. Whom would a well-to-do patient consult for a cure in the early modern period? 3. How did the Ancient tradition shape the development of science and medicine? SECTION B 4. On what sources of information did ancient Greeks and Romans rely in treating scientific topics? 5. What was “medieval” about medieval medicine? 6. How was knowledge exchanged between Chinese and non-Chinese medical practitioners between 1300 and 1700? 7. How important was money in early modern medical encounters? 8. Discuss the role of women in early modern medical practice. 9. “The next care to be taken, in respect of the Senses, is a supplying of their infirmities with Instruments, and, as it were, the adding of artificial Organs to the natural; this in one of them has been of late years accomplisht with prodigious benefit to all sorts of useful knowledge, by the invention of Optical Glasses” (Robert Hooke, Micrographia). Discuss. 10. Why did natural philosophers in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries perform experiments? 11. What was the significance of chemistry to the practice of medicine in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries? 12. How do archival sources shape historians’ interpretations of the history of early medicine? END OF PAPER Page 2 of 2 NST2HP Natural Sciences Tripos Part II: History and Philosophy of Science Thursday 6 June 2019 09.00–12.00 Paper 2 Sciences and Empires (1780–present) You should answer four questions in total. Answer one question from Section A and three questions from Section B. All questions carry equal weighting. Begin each answer on a separate sheet. Write legibly and on only one side of the paper. Answers must be tied up in separate bundles, marked 1, 2, 3, etc. according to the number of the question. Attach a completed coversheet to each bundle and complete a master coversheet listing all questions attempted. It is essential that you write your examination number and not your name on the coversheet and on each bundle. You may not start to read the questions printed on the subsequent pages of this question paper until instructed to do so by the invigilator. Page 1 of 2 SECTION A 1. “The name ‘Science and Empire’ is as unsatisfactory as it is Eurocentric” (Kapil Raj, 2007). Do you agree? 2. “The ways societies support science have changed since 1800, but their reasons for doing so have not.” Assess this claim. 3. What implications did the emergence of laboratories and disciplines in Northern Europe have for the history of science and technology in East Asia? SECTION B 4. Samurai hung tablets with the solutions to geometry problems on the walls of Japanese temples in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. How did this reflect broader trends in knowledge exchange and production in the Tokugawa shogunate? 5. What problems and opportunities does the term “Humboldtian science” pose for the pursuit of a global history of science? 6. What was the relation between the public display of scientific knowledge and the production of scientific knowledge in nineteenth-century Britain? 7. Why did so many early debates about Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species focus on humans, a subject only briefly mentioned in the book? 8. What roles have the audiences for anthropology played in its development? 9. Did industrial scientists and academic scientists pursue the same goals in the early twentieth-century USA? 10. “Society does not a priori owe the scientist, even the good scientist, support, any more than it owes the artist or the writer or the musician support” (Alvin Weinberg, 1964). Why was this claim controversial? 11. How have colonisation and decolonisation affected anthropological fieldwork? 12. What does the history of Tsinghua University suggest about the relation between technocracy and socialism in the People's Republic of China? END OF PAPER Page 2 of 2 NST2HP Natural Sciences Tripos Part II: History and Philosophy of Science Tuesday 4 June 2019 09.00–12.00 Paper 3 Modern Medicine and Life Sciences (1780–present) You should answer four questions in total. Answer one question from Section A and three questions from Section B. All questions carry equal weighting. Begin each answer on a separate sheet. Write legibly and on only one side of the paper. Answers must be tied up in separate bundles, marked 1, 2, 3, etc. according to the number of the question. Attach a completed coversheet to each bundle and complete a master coversheet listing all questions attempted. It is essential that you write your examination number and not your name on the coversheet and on each bundle. You may not start to read the questions printed on the subsequent pages of this question paper until instructed to do so by the invigilator. Page 1 of 2 SECTION A 1. “It makes no sense to write a history of ‘science and medicine’ because there have been so many different kinds of science.” Discuss. 2. How have changes in the way biology and medicine are patronised been reflected in how they are practised? 3. “It has made less difference whether medicine was practised in a hospital, a laboratory or in the community than in what historical period it was done.” Discuss. SECTION B 4. What roles have men played in the history of reproductive technologies? 5. “Reductionism has been the driving ethos of twentieth-century biology.” Discuss. 6. To what degree has patenting helped or hindered biomedical science? 7. Was medicine a science or an art in the first two-thirds of the twentieth century? 8. “The term tropical medicine does not imply merely the treatment of tropical diseases. Rather, it implies a science of medicine and, more importantly, a medicine for the empire, where diseases were the great enemies of civilization.” Discuss. 9. Did medicine become militarised during World War II and stay militarised after it? 10. How did nineteenth-century doctors learn to see bodies in new ways? 11. How did the emergence of the germ theory of disease affect discourses of race and ethnicity? 12. What role did twentieth-century processes of decolonisation play in the history of global health? END OF PAPER Page 2 of 2 NST2HP Natural Sciences Tripos Part II: History and Philosophy of Science Monday 3 June 2019 09.00–12.00 Paper 4 Philosophy and Scientific Practice You should answer four questions in total. Answer one question from Section A and three questions from Section B. All questions carry equal weighting. Begin each answer on a separate sheet. Write legibly and on only one side of the paper. Answers must be tied up in separate bundles, marked 1, 2, 3, etc. according to the number of the question. Attach a completed coversheet to each bundle and complete a master coversheet listing all questions attempted. It is essential that you write your examination number and not your name on the coversheet and on each bundle. You may not start to read the questions printed on the subsequent pages of this question paper until instructed to do so by the invigilator. Page 1 of 2 SECTION A 1. What should philosophers of science learn from the plurality of science? 2. What is the function of experiments in the sciences? Discuss with reference to at least two cases from different sciences. 3. “If there are no causes in physics, there can be no causes in biology.” Discuss. SECTION B 4. Is metaphysics conceptually prior to physics? 5. Does relativity theory tell us that future events already exist? 6. What are the most significant threats to objectivity in medical science and why? 7. Are economists right to base their discipline on rational choice modelling? 8. What, if any, normative assumptions are acceptable in welfare economics? 9. “The simplest explanation is the best explanation when accounting for the behaviour of nonhuman animals.” Do you agree? 10. Is personalised medicine possible? 11. “There are, I would submit, no laws in the strict sense about organisms, because organisms are vastly more complicated and idiosyncratic structures [than those the physicist deals with]” (J.J.C. Smart, 1963). Do you agree? 12. Is mechanistic evidence enough to warrant causal inferences about the effectiveness of interventions? END OF PAPER Page 2 of 2 NST2HP Natural Sciences Tripos Part II: History and Philosophy of Science Wednesday 5 June 2019 09.00–12.00 Paper 5 Epistemology and Metaphysics of Science You should answer four questions in total. Answer one question from Section A and three questions from Section B. All questions carry equal weighting. Begin each answer on a separate sheet. Write legibly and on only one side of the paper. Answers must be tied up in separate bundles, marked 1, 2, 3, etc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Session Abstracts for 2013 HSS Meeting
    Session Abstracts for 2013 HSS Meeting Sessions are sorted alphabetically by session title. Only organized sessions have a session abstract. Title: 100 Years of ISIS - 100 Years of History of Greek Science Abstract: However symbolic they may be, the years 1913-2013 correspond to a dramatic transformation in the approach to the history of ancient science, particularly Greek science. Whereas in the early 20th century, the Danish historian of sciences Johan Ludvig Heiberg (1854-1928) was publishing the second edition of Archimedes’ works, in the early 21st century the study of Archimedes' contribution has been dramatically transformed thanks to the technological analysis of the famous palimpsest. This session will explore the historiography of Greek science broadly understood during the 20th century, including the impact of science and technology applied to ancient documents and texts. This session will be in the form of an open workshop starting with three short papers (each focusing on a segment of the period of time under consideration, Antiquity, Byzantium, Post-Byzantine period) aiming at generating a discussion. It is expected that the report of the discussion will lead to the publication of a paper surveying the historiography of Greek science during the 20th century. Title: Acid Rain Acid Science Acid Debates Abstract: The debate about the nature and effect of airborne acid rain became a formative environmental debate in the 1970s, particularly in North America and northern Europe. Based on the scientific, political, and social views of the observers, which rationality and whose knowledge one should trust in determining facts became an issue. The papers in this session discuss why scientists from different countries and socio-political backgrounds came to different conclusions about the extent of acidification.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology, a Romantic Science?
    CONEIXEMENT I SOCIETAT 11 ARTICLES ECOLOGY, A ROMANTIC SCIENCE? Josep M. Camarasa* Ecology is an unusual scientific discipline with characteristics which it shares with very few others (it is, for ex- ample, a science of synthesis, its multiple roots, holistic focus, etc.). These characteristics and the history of the discipline show ecology to be a science which is deeply marked by the Romantic thought of the late 18th and early 19th centuries and which has reached its high points in periods which coincided with a flourishing of Romantic thought –understood as a critique of contemporary civilisation from within, or a critique of modernity. Contents 1. Justification 2. ‘Normal’ science and scientific revolutions 3. Ecology, a Romantic science? A science that differs from others Romanticism and modernity: an ongoing dialectic Science and Romanticism: the emergence of ecology 4. Holism and reductionism in the history of ecology The protohistory of ecology: from Humboldt to Haeckel Ecology’s view of itself: from the name to the thing The ecology of the inter-war period: the emergence of key concepts The ecological revolution of the 1950s and 1960s: matter, energy and information Not yet a fully? ‘normal’ science: recent developments 5. What now? When is the next revival due? * Josep M. Camarasa is an advisor to the Scientific Secretariat of the Institut d'Estudis Catalans. 6 ECOLOGY, A ROMANTIC SCIENCE? 1. Justification ceda with Romanticism, not to mention Schubert, Schumann, Gericault and C. D. Friedrich. Howev- Ecology as a Romantic science? This affirmation er, few would manage to name even one Romantic will, no doubt, be greeted by many with a smile of scientist, despite the fact that the period generally condescension, confirming them in their view that associated with the Romantic movement (late 18th ecology is not a ‘serious’ science.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Distribution of Species from Humboldt and Darwin to DNA
    On the Distribution of Species From Humboldt and Darwin to DNA Sequencing and ‘Spatial Turns’ (Version: 12 – Feb – 2018) Dr. Nils Güttler & Dr. Bernhard C. Schär ETH Zurich Spring Semester 2018 Time Tue 13.15—15.00 Location HG F 26.5 Abstract How did life on planet earth not only evolve over time, but disperse across geographical space? This is one of the core questions of biogeography--a less known subdiscipline emerging around 1800 and continuing to the present. This seminar ask how biogeography came to shape our understanding of where animals, plants, people, and cultures on planet earth 'came from' and 'belong'. Objectives Much of the intellectual history of the life sciences--from the early days of Natural History to modern Biology--rests on two pillars: 1) the question of how life evolved over time, and 2) the question of how life dispersed across geographical space. While there is a vast historiographical literature on pillar no. 1 (mostly on Darwin and Darwinism), the spatial dimension of the life sciences has received far less attention by historians of science. Research into the distribution of life across space belongs to the little known subdiscipline of 'Biogeography'. Alexander von Humboldt, Alfred Russel Wallace, and Alphonse de Candolle count among the 'founding fathers' of the discipline. The aim of this seminar is to explore how theories, practices, and tools of biogeography changed from their inception in the 19th century to their more recent applications, e.g. in DNA sequencing and the environmental sciences. Students will engage with classical texts from the field and explore how their authors were both shaped by and shaped their changing social, cultural and political environments.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MAN of SCIENCE Steven Shapin
    THE IMAGE OF THE MAN OF SCIENCE Steven Shapin The relations between the images of the man of science and the social and cultural realities of scientific roles are both consequential and contingent. Finding out “who the guys were” (to use Sir Lewis Namier’s phrase) does in- deed help to illuminate what kinds of guys they were thought to be, and, for that reason alone, any survey of images is bound to deal – to some extent at least – with what are usually called the realities of social roles.1 At the same time, it must be noted that such social roles are always very substantially con- stituted, sustained, and modified by what members of the culture think is, or should be, characteristic of those who occupy the roles, by precisely whom this is thought, and by what is done on the basis of such thoughts. In socio- logical terms of art, the very notion of a social role implicates a set of norms and typifications – ideals, prescriptions, expectations, and conventions thought properly, or actually, to belong to someone performing an activity of a certain kind. That is to say, images are part of social realities, and the two notions can be distinguished only as a matter of convention. Such conventional distinctions may be useful in certain circumstances. So- cial action – historical and contemporary – very often trades in juxtapositions between image and reality. One might hear it said, for example, that modern American lawyers do not really behave like the high-minded professionals 1 For introductions to pertinent prosopography, see, e.g., Robert M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Darwinian Tension
    This is the accepted manuscript version (pre-proof) of the paper published in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part C, doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.07.003 The Darwinian Tension Romantic Science and the Causal Laws of Nature Hajo Greif* Abstract There have been attempts to subsume Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution under either one of two distinct intellectual traditions: early Victorian natural science and its descendants in political economy (as exemplified by Herschel, Lyell, or Malthus) and the romantic approach to art and science emanating from Germany (as exemplified by Humboldt and Goethe). In this paper, it will be shown how these traditions may have jointly contributed to the design of Darwin’s theory. The hypothesis is that their encounter created a particular tension in the conception of his theory which first opened up its characteristic field and mode of explanation. On the one hand, the domain of the explanandum was conceived of under a holistic and aesthetic view of nature that, in its combination with refined techniques of observation, was deeply indebted to Humboldt in particular. On the other hand, Darwin fashioned explanations for natural phenomena, so conceived, so as to identify their proper causes in a Herschelian spirit. The particular interaction between these two traditions in Darwin, it is concluded, paved the way for a transfer of the idea of causal laws to animate nature while salvaging the romantic idea of a complex, teleological and harmonious order of nature. Keywords Charles Darwin; Alexander von Humboldt; John F.W. Herschel; teleology in nature; aesthetics of nature; causal explanation Acknowledgements This work was supported by a scholarship at the Institute for Advanced Studies on Science, Technology and Society (IAS-STS), Graz, Austria, as long ago as from 2003 through 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • By María Gabriela Torres and Jesús Izaguirre)
    Nature and Culture in Nineteenth-Century Mexico: The Sociedad Mexicana de Historia Natural (1868–1914) By María Gabriela Torres Montero Submitted to the graduate degree program in History and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Chairperson Dr. Gregory T. Cushman ________________________________ Dr. Sara Gregg ________________________________ Dr. Luis Corteguera ________________________________ Dr. Robert Schwaller ________________________________ Dr. Santa Arias Date Defended: October 20, 2014 ii The Dissertation Committee for María Gabriela Torres Montero certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Nature and Culture in Nineteenth-Century Mexico: The Sociedad Mexicana de Historia Natural (1868–1914) ________________________________ Chairperson Gregory T. Cushman Date approved: October 20, 2014 iii Abstract This dissertation centers on the place natural history occupied in Mexican science and the ideas of the members of the Sociedad Mexicana de Historia Natural (SMHN). I propose that between 1865 and 1914, Mexican intellectuals who joined the Sociedad Mexicana de Historia Natural or participated on its margins, maintained a traditional, teleological understanding about the close links between the natural and social world. However, in this period they also embraced the use of scientific inquiry to enhance their understanding of the natural world in order to guide the country toward order and progress, similar to that enjoyed by other Western societies, especially France and the US. Influenced by Humboldt, Comte, Lamarck, and Spencer, Mexican scientists encouraged the study of natural history, believing that there was a strong and reciprocal relationship between the natural and social world.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander Von Humboldt and the Ecopoetics of Walt Whitman
    Colby College Digital Commons @ Colby Honors Theses Student Research 2020 "They Shall be a Kosmos:" Alexander Von Humboldt and the Ecopoetics of Walt Whitman Benjamin Theyerl Colby College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/honorstheses Part of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, Literature in English, North America Commons, Philosophy of Science Commons, and the United States History Commons Colby College theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed or downloaded from this site for the purposes of research and scholarship. Reproduction or distribution for commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the author. Recommended Citation Theyerl, Benjamin, ""They Shall be a Kosmos:" Alexander Von Humboldt and the Ecopoetics of Walt Whitman" (2020). Honors Theses. Paper 1009. https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/honorstheses/1009 This Honors Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at Digital Commons @ Colby. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Colby. “They Shall be a Kosmos:” Alexander Von Humboldt and the Ecopoetics of Walt Whitman Ben Theyerl Honors Thesis 2020 Honors Advisor: Chris Walker Second Reader: Katherine Stubbs Table of Contents/Acknowledgements Acknowledgements Introduction 1 Chapter I: The Final Applause of Science: 5 Science in Leaves of Grass and Whitman’s Ecopoetics 5 Science and Poetry in Whitman’s Epistemology 5 Hearing the Lecture:
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11 Heinrich Berghaus's Map of Human Diseases
    Chapter 11 Heinrich Berghaus's Map of Human Diseases JANE R CAMERINI The first major atlas ofworldwide thematic maps was completed in 1848, consisting of some 90 maps in two volumes. Created by Heinrich Berghaus at the Geographische Kunstschule in Potsdam, the Physikalischer Atlas (PhysicalAtlas) reflected the intense interest and activity in mapping a wide range of natural phenomena in the first part of the nineteenth century. The intent of this essay is to contextualize Berghaus's 1848 map of diseases, the earliest world map in an atlas showing the geographical distribution of epidemic and endemic human diseases (Figure 1).1 This world map of human diseases is a well-known landmark in the history of medical cartography, representing both a synthesis of the early period of medical mapping and a source from which popular and increasingly focused epidemiological maps developed.2 In situating the Berghaus disease map in the context of its makers and of the history of thematic cartography, I will argue that the map participated in a major shift in how natural phenomena were studied. This shift in conceptualizing and representing the natural world has been confounded with the notion of "Humboldtian science", and I hope to begin here to put Humboldt, Berghaus, and mid-nineteenth-century medical mapping in a larger perspective.3 In spite of the interest in place, climate, and disease dating back to the Hippocratic era (450-350 BC), the use of geographic maps to enhance the understanding of disease did not emerge until the late eighteenth century, with rapid development by Jane Camerini, Department of History of Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Putting Science in Its Place Science.Culture a Series Edited by Steven Shapin
    Putting Science in Its Place science.culture A series edited by Steven Shapin Other science.culture series titles available: The Scientific Revolution, by Steven Shapin Putting Science in Its Place Geographies of Scientific Knowledge David N. Livingstone The University of Chicago Press Chicago and London David Livingstone is professor of geography and intellectual history at Queen’s University, Belfast. A Fellow of the British Academy and the Royal Society of Arts and a member of the Royal Irish Academy, Livingstone is the author of numerous books, including The Geographical Tradition: Episodes in the History of a Contested Enterprise. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637 The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London © 2003 by The University of Chicago All rights reserved. Published 2003 Printed in the United States of America 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 1 2 3 4 5 ISBN: 0-226-48722-9 (cloth) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Livingstone, David N., 1953– Putting science in its place : geographies of scientific knowledge / David N. Livingstone. p. cm. — (Science.culture) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-226-48722-9 (acid-free paper) 1. Science—Social aspects. 2. Science and civilization. I. Title. II. Series. Q175.5 .L59 2003 303.48؅3—dc21 2003001355 ø The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1992. For Frances Contents List of Illustrations ix Preface
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    1 Climatic c hange: e cology ’ s b ig q uestion Ich werde Pfl anzen und Fo ß ilien sammeln, mit vortrefl ichen Sextanten von Ramsden, einen Quadrant von Bird, und einen Chronometer von Louis Berthoud werde ich n ü zliche astronomische Beobachtungen machen k ö nnen; ich werde die Luft chemisch zerlegen, – die ß alles ist aber nicht Hauptzwek meiner Reise. Auf das Zusammenwirken der Kr ä fte, den Einfl u ß der unbelebten Sch ö pfung auf die belebte Thier - und Pfl anzenwelt, auf diese Harmonie sollen st ä ts meine Augen gerichtet seyn. [I shall collect plants and fossils, I shall be able to make useful astronomic observations with an excellent sextant by Ramsden, with a quadrant by Bird, and a chronometer by Louis Berthoud; I shall conduct chemical analyses of the air, – but all that is not the main purpose of my expedition. Above all, I will observe the interactions of forces, the infl uence of the inanimate envi- ronment on plant and animal life. My eyes will constantly focus on this harmony.] Alexander von Humboldt (1799) in a letter to Karl Ehrenbert von Moll before his 5 - year exploration of the Americas 1 . Science is driven by substantive questions that organize and focus the intel- lectual efforts of researchers. In Astronomy, how did the Universe begin? In Physics, what comprises matter? In Biology, how are genes duplicated over generations? In Ecology, how do ecosystems change when climate changes? Answering this substantive ecological question, particularly when climate alterationCOPYRIGHTED includes an increase MATERIALin the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, requires a synthesis of all we think we know – from the physiology of plants and animals to population and community ecology to ecosystem productivity and element cycling – and we still do Global Change and the Terrestrial Biosphere: Achievements and Challenges, 1st edition.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper and Poster Abstracts for 2015 History of Science Society Meeting
    Paper and Poster Abstracts for 2015 History of Science Society Meeting Abstracts are sorted by the last name of the primary author. Author: Will Abberley Title: Darwinian Mimicry, Maladaptation and Narrative Uncertainty Session: Roundtable: Darwinian Loose Ends: Evolution, Narrative and Maladaptation (Saturday, November 21, 1:30 – 3:30 PM) Abstract: This presentation will discuss the uncertain narrative trajectories of the theories of protective mimicry described by Darwin and his supporters, Henry Walter Bates and Alfred Russel Wallace. The tendency of some organisms to resemble other, inedible species, and thus avoid being eaten, was celebrated as a vivid example of organisms adapting to their environments. Yet this mimicry was also maladaptive, as it enabled weak forms to survive by parasitically hiding behind other species’ defences. Will argues Darwin, Bates and Wallace equivocated in their narrations of mimicry as an evolutionary phenomenon. Sometimes they suggested such ‘degenerate’ mimics were doomed to extinction by the efficient mechanism of natural selection; other times they rejected this teleology, presenting natural selection as the author rather than the foe of maladaptive mimics. Author: Charlotte Abney Salomon Title: A Mineralogical Geography: Chemists, Geologists, and Mapmakers in Eighteenth- Century Sweden Session: Chemistry in (Practical) Context: Connecting Eighteenth-Century Chemistry to its Uses (Friday, November 20, 3:45 – 5:45 PM) Abstract: In the conventionally accepted history of geological mapmaking, formulated by Martin Rudwick, its techniques developed from two general scientific perspectives in France and England, that of what he calls "mineral geographers” and “traveller-naturalists,” with cartographic conventions from disparate traditions of the former coalescing with the latter to form a unified visual language within the Geological Society of London around 1820.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander Von Humboldt's Views of the Cultures of the World
    The Art of Science: Alexander von Humboldt’s Views of the Cultures of the World An Introduction by Vera M. Kutzinski and Ottmar Ette Since the turn of the century, a happy revolution has taken place in our conception of the civilizations of diff erent peoples, and of the factors that either obstruct or encourage progress. We have come to know certain peoples whose customs, institutions, and arts diff er as much from those of the Greeks and Romans as the original forms of extinct animals diff er from those species that are the focus of descriptive natural history. The Asiatick Society of Calcutta has cast a vivid light on the history of the peoples of Asia. The monuments of Egypt, which are nowadays described with ad- mirable exactitude, have been compared to monuments in the most distant lands, and my study of the indigenous peoples of the Americas appears at a time when we no longer consider as unworthy of our attention anything that diverges from the style that the Greeks bequeathed to us through their inimitable models. (2) With these remarks in the 1813 introduction to his Views of the Cordilleras and Monuments of the Indigenous Peoples of the Americas, Alexander von Hum- boldt took a clear and contentious stand within the centuries- long polemic known as the “Dispute on the New World.” This debate began with the so- called discovery and conquest of America and became more pointed during the course of the eighteenth century in the writings of the Comte de Buff on, Cornelius de Pauw, the Abbot Raynal, and many others.
    [Show full text]