sign in sign up
<<
Home , Little Round Top, Siege of Suffolk, Stonewall Brigade, Strong Vincent

Morris Penny, J. Gary Laine. Law's Brigade in the War Between the Union and the Confederacy. Shippensburg, Penn: White Mane Publishing, 1997. xxi + 458 pp. $37.50, paper, ISBN 978-1-57249-024-6.

Reviewed by Thomas D. Mays

Published on H-CivWar (August, 1997)

Anyone with an interest in the battle of Get‐ number of good maps that trace the path of each tysburg is familiar with the famous stand taken regiment in the fghting. The authors also spice on on the second day by Joshua the narrative with letters from home and interest‐ Chamberlain's 20th . Chamberlain's men ing stories of individual actions in the feld and and 's Union brigade saved camp, including the story of a duel fought behind the left fank of the and may have in‐ the lines during the siege of Sufolk. fuenced the outcome of the battle. While the leg‐ Laine and Penny begin with a very brief in‐ end of the defenders of Little Round Top contin‐ troduction to the service of Evander McIver Law ues to grow in movies and books, little has been and the regiments that would later make up the written about their opponents on that day, includ‐ brigade. Law, a graduate of the South Carolina ing Evander Law's Alabama Brigade. In the short Military Academy (now known as the Citadel), time the brigade existed (1863-1865), Law's Al‐ had been working as an instructor at a military abamians participated in some of the most des‐ prep school in Alabama when the war began. The perate contests of the war. frst regiments that would later make up part of The authors, J. Gary Laine and Morris M. Pen‐ the brigade were the 4th and 15th Alabama, ny, have a personal interest in the history of the formed in 1861. In 1862, Law rose to command brigade. Both are descendents of men who served the 4th and later the brigade in which it served. in its ranks. The work will be attractive to all stu‐ Several other regiments were raised in Alabama dents of Alabama Confederate history. Laine and during the spring of 1862. These men enlisted to Penny carefully follow the brigade through each avoid the Confederate Conscription Act and campaign from 1863 and give the reader a de‐ formed the 44th, 47th and 48th Alabama. The scat‐ tailed account of each regiment's role in battle. tered regiments were united in January 1863 to While some might fnd the battle narratives a bit form Law's Alabama Brigade of Hood's Division, confusing, they are supported with a generous Longstreet's Corps. H-Net Reviews

Law's brigade saw its frst action as a unit Much of the study follows Law in his personal during 's siege of Sufolk, Vir‐ spats with other Confederate general ofcers. Law ginia, in the winter and spring of 1863. Later, af‐ provides a perfect example of the petty jealousies ter had been wounded in the bat‐ that plagued the southern command system tle of Gettysburg, Law assumed command of the throughout the war. Although the authors provide division and led the attack on Little Round Top. an enlightening account of Law's personal battles, The brigade then traveled with Longstreet to sup‐ many readers might disagree with their interpre‐ port 's attack on the Federals at tation of his actions. When Longstreet attempted Chickamauga and continued on to Tennessee and to promote a senior brigadier (and one of Law's Longstreet's siege of Knoxville. In 1864, the personal rivals) to command of brigade returned to Virginia to take a major part Hood's division, Law became completely insubor‐ in the . The unit spent the dinate. He thought the job should have been his. rest of the war sufering the hardships of the Rather than accept Longstreet's decision and do nearly ten-month . Upon his duty, Law tendered his resignation to Robert E. Lee's surrender at Appomattox, 973 of Longstreet and went to Richmond. the 6,260 men who had served with the brigade Instead of retiring from the service as he stat‐ were still with the colors. ed he would do when he resigned, Law began a While the book is a valuable addition to the personal campaign to discredit Lee's "Old War history of Civil War brigades, it has a few faws. Horse." Once at the capitol, Law conveniently lost One drawback to the study is its lack of a clear fo‐ track of his written resignation and began to pres‐ cus. The authors have attempted to tell two sepa‐ sure politicians and government ofcials to over‐ rate stories and complete neither one. The story of ride Longstreet's recommendation of Jenkins, or Evander Law and the history of the regiments at least to transfer the Alabama brigade. When that made up his brigade are both incomplete. To that did not work, Law worked to trump up begin with, when one hears mention of "Law's charges against Longstreet. Longstreet learned of Brigade," the frst question becomes, which one? this when he discovered a petition signed by some Law was wounded during the battle of First Man‐ of the ofcers from Law's brigade in which they assas and then rose to command a brigade that in‐ asked to be transferred out of the division. That cluded the 2nd and 11th Mississippi, 6th North was too much. Longstreet called for Law's arrest Carolina, and 4th Alabama. Under Law's com‐ and court-martial for having lost his resignation mand, this brigade distinguished itself during the and inspiring insubordination within the brigade. Peninsula campaign, Second Manassas, and at But Jeferson Davis and Confederate Inspector Antietam. But the authors narrow this story to General intervened and restored only a few paragraphs, which leaves the reader Law to his command over the objections of wanting much more. Law's Alabama Brigade was Longstreet and Lee. not formed until 1863, and even then Law was not When Law attempted to return to his com‐ in direct command of it for much of the time. In mand, Longstreet again ordered his arrest. fact, William Flake Perry commanded the brigade Longstreet explained that "to hold me at the head far longer than Law. Even during the last days of of command while encouraging mutinous con‐ the war, Law was not with the brigade; he was in duct in its ranks was beyond all laws and customs temporary command of Matthew C. Butler's South of war" (James Longstreet, From Manassas to Ap‐ Carolina cavalry brigade in North Carolina. pomattox [1969], p. 549). Longstreet gave Davis an ultimatum: Either hold Law for trial or relieve

2 H-Net Reviews

Longstreet of his command. After a protracted units included Jackson's Stonewall Brigade, stand of, the situation was defused when Law Hood's Texans, and the Kentucky Orphan Brigade. was transferred out of the division. What is inter‐ The Federal army had a few well known units as esting about this is that the authors fnd little to well. The , or Black Hats, and the blame in Law's conduct. In fact, they argue, the Irish Brigade both stand out. But these famous real culprits were the authorities in Richmond units are the exception. who acted far too slowly to resolve the spat be‐ The work has a few stylistic problems that tween Jenkins and Law over who would com‐ readers might fnd bothersome as well. In addi‐ mand Hood's division. Many readers may not fnd tion to some spelling and grammatical errors, the that argument a convincing excuse for Law's dis‐ authors constantly stop the fow of the narrative honesty and blatant insubordination. Not even during or after battle descriptions to discuss con‐ the greatest Longstreet detractors could condone ficting sources. It is rare when Civil War eyewit‐ such action. ness accounts agree on small or even large details, Another problem with the study can be seen and it is best to leave the discussion of primary in its treatment of the regiments in Law's Brigade. and secondary sources in the endnotes rather The 4th and 15th Alabama had been in the feld than in the narrative. For example, in the middle since 1861. The 4th earned a fghting reputation of their description of Gettysburg, the authors during the battle of First Manassas and later on note that the long standing argument over the Peninsula. The 15th became a member of Longstreet's actions on July 2nd is a subject that Thomas J. Jackson's legendary "foot cavalry" in has "been studied in considerable depth by Free‐ the . Even the 44th, 47th, and man, Coddington, and Pfanz" (120). The problem 48th Alabama had fought at Cedar Mountain, Sec‐ with that statement is that none of those authors ond Manassas, and Antietam prior to the forma‐ is introduced in the text or even listed in the in‐ tion of the brigade. The difculty here is that the dex. The reader is left to guess their identify. Un‐ authors confne the early war records of these less readers are familiar with Douglas S. Free‐ units to a few short paragraphs and really only man's Lee's Lieutenants (1942), Edwin B. Codding‐ begin their story in 1863, almost two years into ton's The (1968), and Harry the war. Perhaps the authors would have been W. Pfanz's Gettysburg, The Second Day (1987), better served to concentrate on compiling com‐ they will be hard pressed to know. The discussion plete histories of the regiments that made up the of primary and secondary sources is best left in brigade. the endnotes. While Law's Alabama Brigade is a welcome Still, many of these points are matters of style addition to the narrow feld of Civil War brigade and interpretation and should not override the histories, it is a hard ft. During the war, soldiers book's overall contribution. Laine and Penny have saved their strongest loyalties for their regiments. produced a valuable addition to the history of One of the reasons for this is that most regiments Confederate brigades and Alabama troops in the remained intact during the war while brigades war. were formed and split up quite often. This be‐ Copyright (c) 1997 by H-Net, all rights re‐ comes obvious when one compares the fve hun‐ served. This work may be copied for non-proft dred or so regimental histories that have been educational use if proper credit is given to the au‐ written over the years with the relative handful of thor and the list. For other permission, please con‐ brigade histories. A few brigades did become fa‐ tact [email protected]. mous during the war. Some of the better known

3 H-Net Reviews

If there is additional discussion of this review, you may access it through the network, at https://networks.h-net.org/h-civwar

Citation: Thomas D. Mays. Review of Penny, Morris; Laine, J. Gary. Law's Alabama Brigade in the War Between the Union and the Confederacy. H-CivWar, H-Net Reviews. August, 1997.

URL: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=1219

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.

4