Diversifying the Bar: Lawyers Make History Biographies of Early And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Diversifying the Bar: Lawyers Make History Biographies of Early And Diversifying the bar: lawyers make history Biographies of Early and Exceptional Ontario Lawyers of Diverse Communities Arranged By Diverse Community For each lawyer, this document offers some or all of the following information: name of diverse community or heritage name gender year and place of birth; year of death where applicable year admitted to the profession in Ontario (up to 1889, the year called to the bar and/or year admitted to the courts as a solicitor; from 1889, all lawyers admitted to practice were admitted as both barristers and solicitors, and all were called to the bar) whether appointed K.C. or Q.C. biographical notes name of nominating person or organization if relevant sources used in preparing the biography and suggestions for further reading Please note that where possible, lawyers provided, approved or edited their own biographies, including the names of their community or heritage. The biographies are ordered by name of diverse community (see list on next page), then by year called to the bar, then alphabetically by last name. Francophone lawyers have two entries each, in French then English. Lawyers associated with more than one community are listed under each diverse community. For more information on the project, including the set of biographies arranged by diverse community rather than by year of call, please click here for the Diversifying the Bar: Lawyers Make History home page. Last published May 2012 by The Law Society of Upper Canada. Diversifying the bar: lawyers make history Diverse Communities Represented in the Biographies The following is a list of all diverse communities and heritages with which the early and exceptional lawyers in this project are identified. Lawyers were asked to describe their own identities; their choice of names for their communities are included below. Biographies are ordered by the name of the community; biographies of lawyers belonging to more than one community are repeated for each community. If you are interested in a particular diverse community, please conduct a word search of this file using the diverse community names listed below. Aboriginal . African Canadian . Anishinabek . Anishnabe/Ojibway . Antiochian Orthodox Christian . Austrian . Arab . Black . Black African . Bulgarian . Chinese . Dutch . Filipino . Finnish . Francophone . German . Greek . Hungarian . Indo-Guyanese . Irish Catholic . Italian . Japanese . Jewish . Jewish, Orthodox . Kanienkehaka/Haudenosaunee . Korean . Lebanese . Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgendered or Two-Spirited . Lithuanian . Métis . Muslim . Persons with Disabilities . Polish . Quebecer . Romanian . Roman Catholic . Russian . Russian-Polish . Sikh . South Asian . Tamil . Ukrainian . Women Diversifying the bar: lawyers make history Heritage or Community: Aboriginal Name: WHITE, Solomon Male Born 1836 on the Huron Reserve near Amherstburg, Ontario Died 1911 Called to the Bar: 1865 K.C. Biographical Information: Solomon White was the first person of Aboriginal heritage called to the bar in Ontario. White was the son of a Wyandot chief and a Francophone woman. He practised in Windsor and Cobalt, though he was also a farmer, businessman, and politician. In 1877, he and his father gave up their Indian status by choice, and profited personally, by promoting the conversion of some Huron Reserve lands from commonly held to individually owned lands, thereby accelerating the assimilation of the Wyandot people. However, from 1878 to 1894 (except for 1886-1890), White sat as a Conservative member of the provincial parliament, the first Aboriginal member and “the first legislator in Ontario to voice native concerns and attitudes.” (Demski) He argued for the provincial enfranchisement of Aboriginals, for native land rights, and for clemency for Aboriginals who took part in the North-West Rebellion of 1885, positions that led to his defeat at the polls. He was named K.C. in 1908. Derived solely from Peter E. Paul Demski, “Solomon White,” Dictionary of Canadian Biography Online v. 14 (University of Toronto/Université Laval). Web. Diversifying the bar: lawyers make history Heritage or Community: Aboriginal Name: KERR, William John Simcoe Male Born 1840 at Brantford, Upper Canada Died 1875 Called to the Bar: 1862 Biographical Information: William John Simcoe Kerr was the second known member of the Law Society of Upper Canada of partial Aboriginal descent. He was the descendant of two powerful military leaders and allies, Chief Joseph Brant (Thayendanagea) of the Mohawks and Sir William Johnson, superintendent of Indians in the late eighteenth century. Simcoe Kerr functioned as an intermediary among the Iroquois and between the British and the Iroquois during the period in which Aboriginal peoples lost many powers of self-government. Four years after he became a lawyer, he assumed the hereditary chieftaincy of the Six Nations at Grand River, serving from 1866 to 1875. In 1870, Aboriginal leaders from across Canada met on Six Nations lands to strategize about laws constraining their peoples and lands. Kerr, elected chairman, offered interpretations of the existing acts, section by section, to worried and angry attendees. He also contributed to the Indian Act of 1876, the legislation that defined Indian status and set out policies and structures for the management and anticipated assimilation of Aboriginal peoples. Nominated by Jacqueline Briggs. Sources: William J. Simcoe Kerr, The General Council of the Six Nations, and Delegates from Different Bands in Western and Eastern Canada (Hamilton, 1870) CIHM 05766; Sally Weaver, “The Iroquois: The Consolidation of the Grand River Reserve in the Mid- Nineteenth Century, 1847-1875,” in Edward S. Rogers and Donald B. Smith, eds., Aboriginal Ontario: Historical Perspectives on the First Nations (Toronto: Dundurn Press, 1994), 182-212. Diversifying the bar: lawyers make history Heritage or Community: Aboriginal Name: LICKERS, Norman Male Born 1913 in Six Nations Territory Died 1987 Called to the Bar: 1938 Biographical Information: In the history of Ontario’s legal profession, Norman Lickers was the first person of full Aboriginal heritage (both parents were First Nations). He earned a BA from the University of Western Ontario and became a lawyer at a time when Aboriginal people could lose their status under the Indian Act merely by graduating from university or by joining a profession. Lickers set up practice in Brantford. He soon began to speak on behalf of his community as well as his clients. In 1946, he was appointed by the federal government as counsel to the Standing Committee on Indian Affairs which sponsored important revisions to the Indian Act in 1951. However, Lickers was disbarred from practice in 1950 for professional misconduct. He continued to advocate for his people. In 1969, he organized a protest against a policy that would have abolished special status for Aboriginals. A long-serving band councillor, he also founded educational and other organizations to preserve and promote Aboriginal culture. Source: Jacqueline Briggs, "Norman E. Lickers: The Untold Story of the First Aboriginal Lawyer in Canada," unpublished paper, 2008; Constance Backhouse, “Gender and Race in the Construction of ‘Legal Professionalism’: Historical Perspectives” (2003), 2-12. http://www.lsuc.on.ca/media/constance_backhouse_gender_and_race.pdf. Diversifying the bar: lawyers make history Heritage or Community: Aboriginal Name: ISAACS, Peter Male Born 1938 in Oshweken, Ontario Called to the Bar: 1966 Biographical Information: Peter Isaacs is a Mohawk and one of the first Aboriginal lawyers in Ontario. In the 1960s, he was a partner in the leading Hamilton firm of Millar, Alexander, Tokiwa and Isaacs, a multi-ethnic firm whose successful real estate practice depended in part on its ability to attract clients of diverse communities. In 1995, he became one of the first judges of Aboriginal heritage, appointed to the Ontario Court of Justice in Stratford. Source: Philip Sworden, "'A Small United Nations': The Hamilton Firm of Millar, Alexander, Tokiwa, and Isaacs, 1962-1993," in C. Wilton, ed. Inside the Law: Canadian Law Firms in Historical Perspective (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1996), 469-97. Diversifying the bar: lawyers make history Heritage or Community: Aboriginal Name: STAATS, Howard Edwin Male Born 1940 in Six Nations Territory Called to the Bar: 1966 Q.C. Biographical Information: One of the first Aboriginal lawyers in Ontario, Howard Staats practises in Brantford. Born and raised on the Six Nations Reserve, his determination to achieve without boundaries has enabled him to set an example to all, especially to Native youth, that all dreams are attainable. Many years of professionalism, compassion, confidence and proven results have made him a pillar of the Brant County legal community. Mr. Staats was named Q.C. in 1979. His achievements have inspired his own family as well; his son Mark Staats is currently practising with the firm, and a granddaughter is presently on her path to becoming a lawyer. Diversifying the bar: lawyers make history Heritage or Community: Aboriginal Name: OPEKOKEW, Delia Female Born in Saskatchewan Called to the Bar: 1979 Biographical Information: Delia Opekokew is one of the first Aboriginal women lawyers and the first to be called to the bar in both provinces of Ontario and Saskatchewan. In private practice, she has negotiated treaty rights and advised on Aboriginal law for clients across Canada. She helped resolve the land claim of the Canoe Lake Cree Nation, her
Recommended publications
  • " We Are Family?": the Struggle for Same-Sex Spousal Recognition In
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be fmrn any type of computer printer, The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reprodudion. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e-g., maps, drawings, &arb) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to tight in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6' x 9" black and Mite photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustratims appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Bell 8 Howell Information and Leaning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 "WE ARE FAMILY'?": THE STRUGGLE FOR SAME-SEX SPOUSAL RECOGNITION IN ONTARIO AND THE CONUNDRUM OF "FAMILY" lMichelIe Kelly Owen A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Sociology and Equity Studies in Education Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto Copyright by Michelle Kelly Owen 1999 National Library Bibliothiique nationale l*B of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographic Services sewices bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395.
    [Show full text]
  • Centennial Ontario: Conflict, Change, and Identity in 1967
    Lesson Resource Kit - Centennial Ontario: Conflict, Change, and Identity in 1967 Grade 10: Canadian History since World War I Introduction Designed to fit into teachers’ practice, this resource kit provides links, activity suggestions, primary source handouts and worksheets to assist you and your students in applying, inquiring, and understanding Canada between 1945 and 1982. Front cover of Confederation Train itinerary, ca. 1965 Project files of the Centennial Planning Branch, RG 5-52-89 Archives of Ontario, I0073509 Topic Ontario during the 1960s Sources Mirror, Mirror... Looking back through the eyes of the CFPL news camera online exhibit Use the Archives of Ontario’s online exhibit about the CFPL television station: o As a learning resource for yourself o As sites to direct your students for inquiry projects o As places to find and use primary sources related to the curriculum Page | 1 Themes that can be addressed Immigration Canadian identity The civil rights movement Citizenship Curriculum Strand D. Canada, 1945-1982 Historical Thinking Overall Expectations Specific Expectations Concepts D1. Describe some key social, economic, and political events, trends, and developments in Historical Significance; D1.1, D1.2, D1.3, D1.4 Canada between 1945 and Continuity and Change 1982, and assess their significance for different groups in Canada. D2. Analyse some key experiences of and interactions between different communities in Canada, as well as Continuity and Change; D2.1, D2.2, D2.3. D2.4, interactions between Historical Perspective D2.5 Canada and the international community, from 1945 to 1982 and the changes that resulted from them. D3. analyse how significant events, individuals, and groups, including Aboriginal peoples, Québécois, and Historical Significance; immigrants, contributed to D3.1, D3.3, D3.6 Cause and Consequence the development of identity, citizenship, and heritage in Canada between 1945 and 1982.
    [Show full text]
  • Policing and Surveilling the Black Community in Toronto, Canada, 1992-2016
    From the Yonge Street Riot to the Carding Controversy: Policing and Surveilling the Black Community in Toronto, Canada, 1992-2016 By Maria Kyres A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Program in Cultural Studies in Conformity with the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada September, 2017 Copyright © Maria Kyres Abstract In the last decade, the conversation surrounding racial profiling and carding in the city of Toronto garnered much public and scholarly attention. Many journalists, academics and activists have examined the Community Contacts Policy, also known as carding, as well as mass incarceration and the police shootings and killings of unarmed, young Black men. The Yonge Street Uprising and the carding controversy in Toronto serve as two case studies to explore the ways that Black men have been disproportionately profiled, policed and surveilled in this country, particularly in the province of Ontario. Despite the fact that the Yonge Street Uprising and the carding controversy occurred decades apart, a common thread throughout both cases was the narrative of Black male criminality. In addition, it became apparent that many of the practices employed in contemporary society, such as racial profiling, carding and mass incarceration were derived from slavery, with the goal of limiting the freedom and mobility of Black people. Therefore, an examination of Canada’s historical treatment of Black people is necessary in order to demonstrate how practices rooted in slavery, such as, fugitive slave advertisements and historical representations of Black criminality helped inform current police practices. Through an analysis of historical, legal, criminological, and critical race scholarship, this work seeks to examine how and why Black people, specifically Black men, were and continue to be disproportionately more likely to be policed, surveilled and incarcerated.
    [Show full text]
  • Area 83 Eastern Ontario International Area Committee Minutes June 2
    ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS AREA 83 EASTERN ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL Area 83 Eastern Ontario International Area Committee Minutes June 2, 2018 ACM – June 2, 2018 1 ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS AREA 83 EASTERN ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL 1. OPENING…………………………………………………………………………….…………….…4 2. REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA………………………………….…………….…...7 3. ROLL CALL………………………………………………………………………….……………….7 4. REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF September 9, 2017 ACM…………………7 5. DISTRICT COMMITTEE MEMBERS’ REPORTS ……………………………………………....8 District 02 Malton……………………………………………………………………………….…….. 8 District 06 Mississauga……………………………………………………………………….…….. 8 District 10 Toronto South Central…………………………………………………………….….…. 8 District 12 Toronto South West………………………………………………………………….…. 9 District 14 Toronto North Central………………………………………………………………..….. 9 District 16 Distrito Hispano de Toronto…………………………………………………….………..9 District 18 Toronto City East……………………………………………………………………........9 District 22 Scarborough……………………………………………………………………………… 9 District 26 Lakeshore West………………………………………………………………….……….10 District 28 Lakeshore East……………………………………………………………………………11 District 30 Quinte West…………………………………………………………………………….. 11 District 34 Quinte East……………………………………………………………………………… 12 District 36 Kingston & the Islands……………………………………………………………….… 12 District 42 St. Lawrence International………………………………………………………………. 12 District 48 Seaway Valley North……………………………………………………………….……. 13 District 50 Cornwall…………………………………………………………………………………… 13 District 54 Ottawa Rideau……………………………………………………………………………. 13 District 58 Ottawa Bytown……………………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Carissima Mathen*
    C h o ic es a n d C o n t r o v e r sy : J udic ia l A ppointments in C a n a d a Carissima Mathen* P a r t I What do judges do? As an empirical matter, judges settle disputes. They act as a check on both the executive and legislative branches. They vindicate human rights and civil liberties. They arbitrate jurisdictional conflicts. They disagree. They bicker. They change their minds. In a normative sense, what judges “do” depends very much on one’s views of judging. If one thinks that judging is properly confined to the law’s “four comers”, then judges act as neutral, passive recipients of opinions and arguments about that law.1 They consider arguments, examine text, and render decisions that best honour the law that has been made. If judging also involves analysis of a society’s core (if implicit) political agreements—and the degree to which state laws or actions honour those agreements—then judges are critical players in the mechanisms through which such agreement is tested. In post-war Canada, the judiciary clearly has taken on the second role as well as the first. Year after year, judges are drawn into disputes over the very values of our society, a trend that shows no signs of abating.2 In view of judges’ continuing power, and the lack of political appetite to increase control over them (at least in Canada), it is natural that attention has turned to the process by which persons are nominated and ultimately appointed to the bench.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rt. Hon. Antonio Lamer, Chief Justice of Canada and of the Supreme Court of Canada, Is Pleased to Welcome Mr
    SUPREME COURT OF CANADA PRESS RELEASE OTTAWA, January 8,1998 -- The Rt. Hon. Antonio Lamer, Chief Justice of Canada and of the Supreme Court of Canada, is pleased to welcome Mr. Justice Ian Binnie to the Court. He stated: “I am very pleased that in the legacy of our late colleague, John Sopinka, another member of the Court has been selected directly from the legal profession. It is important that this Court always be aware of the realities of the practising Bar so that we do not lose sight of the practical effect of our judgments. I am sure that Mr. Justice Binnie, who is counsel of the highest standing in the profession, will make a very valuable and lasting contribution to this Court.” Chief Justice Lamer spoke to Mr. Justice Binnie this morning to congratulate him on his appointment. Mr. Justice Binnie has indicated that he will be available to commence his duties at the Court as of the 26th of January. However, he will not be sitting that week, nor during the two following weeks as the Court is in recess, in order that he may prepare for the Quebec Reference case which will proceed, as scheduled, during the week of February 16th. Mr. Justice Binnie’s swearing-in will take place on February 2, 1998 at 11:00 a.m. in the main courtroom. Ref.: Mr. James O’Reilly Executive Legal Officer (613) 996-9296 COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA COMMUNIQUÉ DE PRESSE OTTAWA, le 8 janvier 1998 -- Le très honorable Antonio Lamer, Juge en chef du Canada et de la Cour suprême du Canada, a le plaisir d’accueillir M.
    [Show full text]
  • Mothering and Work/ Mothering As Work
    A YORK UNIVERSITY PUBLICATION MOTHERING AND WORK/ MOTHERING AS WORK Fallminter 2004 Volume6, Number 2 $15 Featuring articles by JaneMaree Maher, Debra Langan, Lorna Turnbull, Merlinda Weinberg, Alice Home, Naomi Bromberg Bar-Yam, Chris Bobel, Kate Connolly, Maryanne Dever and Lise Saugeres, Corinne Rusch-Drutz, Orit Avishai, Susan Schalge, Kelly C. Walter Carney and many more ... Mothering and Work/ Mothering as Work FalVWinter 2004 Volume 6, Number 2 Founding Editor and Editor-in-Chief Andrea O'Reilly Advisory Board Patricia Bell-Scott, Mary Kay Blakely, Paula Caplan, Patrice DiQuinzio, Miriam Edelson, Miriam Johnson, Carolyn Mitchell, Joanna Radbord, Sara Ruddick, Lori Saint-Martin Literary Editor Rishma Dunlop Book Review Editor Ruth Panofsb Managing Editor Cheryl Dobinson Guest Editorial Board Katherine Bischoping Deborah Davidson Debra Langan Andrea O'Reilly Production Editor Luciana Ricciutelli Proofreader Randy Chase Association for Research on Mothering Atkinson Faculty of Liberal and Professional Studies, 726 Atkinson, York University 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3 Tel: (416) 736-2100 ext. 60366 Email: [email protected]; Website: www.yorku.ca~crm TheJournal of the Association for Research on Mothering (ISSN 1488-0989) is published by The Association for Research on Mothering (ARM) The Association for Research on Mothering (ARM)is the first feminist organization devoted specifically to the topics of mothering and motherhood. ARM is an association of scholars, writers, activists, policy makers, educators, parents, and artists. ARM is housed at Atkinson College, York University, Toronto, Ontario. Our mandate is to provide a forum for the discussion and dissemination of feminist, academic, and community grassroots research, theory, and praxis on mothering and motherhood.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Law Library Review Revue Canadienne Des Bibliothèques Is Published By: De Droit Est Publiée Par
    CANADIAN LAW LIBRARY REVIEW REVUE CANADIENNE DES BIBLIOTHÈQUES DE DROIT 2017 CanLIIDocs 227 VOLUME/TOME 42 (2017) No. 2 APA Journals® Give Your Users the Psychological Research They Need LEADING JOURNALS IN LAW AND PSYCHOLOGY 2017 CanLIIDocs 227 Law and Human Behavior® Official Journal of APA Division 41 (American Psychology-Law Society) Bimonthly • ISSN 0147-7307 2.884 5-Year Impact Factor®* | 2.542 2015 Impact Factor®* Psychological Assessment® Monthly • ISSN 1040-3590 3.806 5-Year Impact Factor®* | 2.901 2015 Impact Factor®* Psychology, Public Policy, and Law® Quarterly • ISSN 1076-8971 2.612 5-Year Impact Factor®* | 1.986 2015 Impact Factor®* Journal of Threat Assessment and Management® Official Journal of the Association of Threat Assessment Professionals, the Association of European Threat Assessment Professionals, the Canadian Association of Threat Assessment Professionals, and the Asia Pacific Association of Threat Assessment Professionals Quarterly • ISSN 2169-4842 * ©Thomson Reuters, Journal Citation Reports® for 2015 ENHANCE YOUR PSYCHOLOGY SERIALS COLLECTION To Order Journal Subscriptions, Contact Your Preferred Subscription Agent American Psychological Association | 750 First Street, NE | Washington, DC 20002-4242 USA ‖‖ CONTENTS / SOMMAIRE 5 From the Editor The Law of Declaratory Judgments 40 De la rédactrice Reviewed by Melanie R. Bueckert 7 President’s Message Pocket Ontario OH&S Guide to Violence and 41 Le mot de la présidente Harassment Reviewed by Megan Siu 9 Featured Articles Articles de fond Power of Persuasion: Essays
    [Show full text]
  • Continuum: Volume 37 (Winter 2013)
    OSGOODE HALL LAW SCHOOL OF YORK UNIVERSITY ALUMNI MAGAZINE • Experience Osgoode • At the Top WINTER 2013 • Advancing Experiential Leadership • Shifting the Discourse CONTINUUM Experience Osgoode 10 Experience Osgoode CONTINUUM Doctrine and theory are important building Osgoode Hall Law School blocks for a career in law, but they aren’t Alumni Magazine the only model of learning law schools Volume 37 employ. Osgoode is proud to be the first and EDITOR only Canadian law school to also include an Anita Herrmann Director, Office of External experiential education requirement as part of Relations & Communications its Juris Doctor (JD) curriculum. 416-736-5364 [email protected] CONTRIBUTING EDITOR 16 At the Top Virginia Corner We asked three high-powered business Communications Manager executives (who just happen to be women WRITERS and graduates of Osgoode) for their thoughts Meaghan Carrington on a range of subjects including what it takes Virginia Corner Kevin Hanson to succeed. Anita Herrmann Lorne Sossin Christine Ward 21 Advancing Experiential PHOTOGRAPHY Leadership AKA Photography The Law Foundation of Ontario’s Community Digital Freedom Fabrice Grover Leadership in Justice Fellowships are building Lydia Guo ’14 bridges between academia and community Ron Montes ’15 agencies by placing leading practitioners in Terry Tingchaleun temporary residence at universities and colleges. WINTER 2013 DESIGN AND PRODUCTION Fish Out of Water Design Inc. PRINTING 22 Shifting the Discourse Colour Innovations Through their academic research as well as direct Continuum is published once a year by Osgoode engagement with law reform processes and Hall Law School of York University for alumni and friends. Ideas and opinions expressed in Continuum public debates, Osgoode professors are having do not necessarily reflect those of the editors, a powerful influence on public policy-making.
    [Show full text]
  • MINISTRY of CORRECTIONS Facilities AREA 83
    MINISTRY OF CORRECTIONS Facilities AREA 83 Name of Facility Address Contact Numbers Area / District Brockville Jail 613-341-2870 10 Wall St. Fax: 613-342-0962 Area 83 Brockville, ON K6V 4R9 District 66 Golden Triangle Ontario 905-457-7050 109 McLaughlin Rd. S. Correctional Institute Fax: 905-452-8606 Area 83 Brampton, ON L6Y 2C8 District 02 Malton St. Lawrence Valley 613-341-2870 Area 83 PO Box 8000 1804 Hwy 2 Correctional & Fax: 613-345-3844 E. Treatment Centre District 66 Golden Triangle Brockville, ON K6V 7N2 Central East 705-328-6000 Area 83 Correctional Centre 541 Hwy 36 Fax: 705-328-6001 Lindsay, ON K9V 6H2 District 86 Kawartha Quinte 613-354-9701 89 Richmond Blvd. Area 83 Detention Centre Fax: 613-354-1209 Napanee, ON K7R 3S1 District 34 Quinte East Ottawa-Carleton Detention 613-824-6080 Area 83 Centre 2244 Innes Road Fax: 613-824-0732 Ottawa, ON K1B 4C4 District 54 Ottawa Rideau Toronto South Detention Center 160 Horner Ave. Area 83 Etobicoke, Ont District 6/18 Toronto Intermittent Centre 160 Horner Ave. (TIC) Etobicoke, Ont Toronto East 416-750-3513 Area 83 55 Civic Rd. Detention Centre Fax: 416-750-3345 Toronto (Scarborough), District 22 Scarborough ON M1L 2K9 1 of 1 FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES AREA 83 ONTARIO REGION Institutions Regional Treatment Centre (Max) Millhaven Institution (Max) 560 King Street West Highway 33 PO Box 22 PO Box 280 Kingston, Ontario K7L 4V7 Bath, Ontario K0H 1G0 (613) 536-6901 (613) 351-8000 Fax: (613) 536-4115 Fax: (613) 351-8136 A/Executive Director: Kathy Hinch Warden: Curtis Jackson District
    [Show full text]
  • Phd Thesis Entitled “A White Wedding? the Racial Politics of Same-Sex Marriage in Canada”, Under the Supervision of Dr
    A White Wedding? The Racial Politics of Same-Sex Marriage in Canada by Suzanne Judith Lenon A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Sociology and Equity Studies in Education Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto © Copyright by Suzanne Judith Lenon (2008) A White Wedding? The Racial Politics of Same-Sex Marriage in Canada Doctor of Philosophy, 2008 Suzanne Judith Lenon Department of Sociology and Equity Studies in Education University of Toronto Abstract In A White Wedding? The Racial Politics of Same-Sex Marriage, I examine the inter-locking relations of power that constitute the lesbian/gay subject recognized by the Canadian nation-state as deserving of access to civil marriage. Through analysis of legal documents, Parliamentary and Senate debates, and interviews with lawyers, I argue that this lesbian/gay subject achieves intelligibility in the law by trading in on and shoring up the terms of racialized neo-liberal citizenship. I also argue that the victory of same-sex marriage is implicated in reproducing and securing a racialized Canadian national identity as well as a racialized civilizational logic, where “gay rights” are the newest manifestation of the modernity of the “West” in a post-9/11 historical context. By centring a critical race/queer conceptual framework, this research project follows the discursive practices of respectability, freedom and civility that circulate both widely and deeply in this legal struggle. I contend that in order to successfully shed its historical markers of degeneracy, the lesbian/gay subject must be constituted not as a sexed citizen but rather as a neoliberal citizen, one who is intimately tied to notions of privacy, property, autonomy and freedom of choice, and hence one who is racialized as white.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Solidarity Wave' on Canadian An
    ‘It’s Our Patriotic Duty to Help Them’: the Socio-Cultural and Economic Impact of the ‘Solidarity wave’ on Canadian and Polish- Canadian Society in the Early 1980s Michal Mlynarz, University of Alberta 56 | This paper examines the economic, social, and cultural impact made on Canadian and Polish-Canadian society as a result of the mass influx of refugees from the People’s Republic of Poland to Canada in the early to mid 1980s. Although a brief overview and examination of Polish immigration history to Canada over the last few centuries is provided, the paper focuses upon the significant effect caused by the arrival of a new wave of Polish immigrants, largely consisting of highly educated and politically vocal individuals, into the country. The paper argues that this period constituted a significant turning point in Polish-Canadian history. Throughout this period, Polish communities across the country organized and rallied around the plight of the refugees and their ancestral homeland in an unprecedented fashion, supporting them through a wide variety of means, including the mass organization of protests, food and medicine drives, and sponsorship schemes to bring in as many people as possible. Mainstream Canadian society was also made more aware of and became more involved in the issue, with both politicians and average citizens nation-wide lending their support to the cause. As a result of the unique socio-cultural nature of the refugees, the great level of support displayed by Polish-Canadians, and the significant level of sympathy and
    [Show full text]