Resemblance of the Once Existing
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date:___________________August 9, 2005 I, _________________________________________________________,Ferenc Traser hereby submit this work as part of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Science in: Architecture It is entitled: RESEMBLANCE OF THE LONG EXISTING: Virtual Reconstruction of the Cistercian Monastery of Pilis This work and its defense approved by: Chair: _______________________________John E Hancock _______________________________Nnamdi Elleh _______________________________Patrick Snadon _______________________________ _______________________________ RESEMBLANCE OF THE LONG EXISTING: THE VIRTUAL RECONSTRUCTION OF THE CISTERCIAN MONASTERY OF PILIS, HUNGARY A Thesis submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the School of Architecture and Interior Design of the College of Design, Architecture, Art, and Planning 2005 by Ferenc Traser Master of Architecture, Technical University of Budapest, 2003 Committee Chair: John E. Hancock Committee Members: Nnamdi Elleh Patrick Snadon ABSTRACT Since computer reconstruction of ancient monuments is a relatively new field, many of its aspects and potentials have not yet been fully utilized or explored. This research will demonstrate that the usual emphases in computer reconstruction, such as data gathering and visual realism, both miss the essential fact that such reconstructions are, in the end, interpretive. It will also be shown that since the exact form and characteristics of now-destroyed monuments are often unknown, computer reconstructions can exploit a more open-ended set of educational, interpretive, interactive, theoretical, and analytical capacities, including revealing the uncertainties of the reconstruction itself. My aim in this research is to explore the advantages and limitations of the application of computers for study and preservation through the partial virtual reconstruction of the Gothic Cistercian Abbey of Pilis, in Hungary, that was founded in 1184. Besides creating a computer model of the site and the structure, the capacities of the new medium as a tool for studying ancient monuments will be investigated, specifically in utilizing historical representational techniques. The approach will help in understanding the history of the monastery and provide an analysis of the significant forms and geometries of the building. Furthermore, issues arising from a theoretical consideration of this medium, such as the meaning of a “reconstructed reality,” and the way our perceptions are affected by these media, will be discussed. These problems will ii be illustrated with three-dimensional models and images that are layered into the treatments of the monument itself. For example, possible alternatives for the reconstruction of the site will be developed and compared to each other. I will take advantage of graphic devices such as hiding certain elements, or transforming them into wire frame models, in order to analyze the inner structure of the abbey and to generate different interpretations of the computer-reconstructed edifice. A series of images, animations and interactive slideshows are presented, portraying the monument in various interpretations, along with text and graphic segments illustrating the theoretical approach to the reconstruction. Trough such techniques, audiences are drawn not merely to realistic forms of representation, or to final renderings of a single interpretation, but also to deeper analytical and educational content. As a prototype, “Virtual Pilis” will contribute to the growing scholarship on “virtual heritage”; in particular its capacity to deliver content to audiences, rather than merely to present images, which is the norm. KEYWORDS Virtual reconstruction, visualization techniques, Cistercian architecture, fountain, Abbey of Pilis, Hungary iii iv DEDICATION To my Mother, Wife ad Daughter v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am greatly indebted to my advisor Professor John Hancock who has accompanied this thesis from the very beginning with amazing and inspiring insights and comments. I would like to express my special thanks to Nnamdi Elleh and Patrick Snadon, who were always motivating readers and critics. I am indebted to the care and stylistic grace that my committee at the University of Cincinnati has taken this writing over the past two years. My gratitude extends to the University of Cincinnati and to CERHAS (Center for Electronic Reconstruction of Historical and Archaeological Sites) for providing the means to conclude this research. My thanks go also to Professor Tamás MezĘs at the Technical University of Budapest, who has initiated this project and drew my attention to this particular site. I am also grateful to Imre Takács, who was highly professional help and provided attention for archaeological details. For many gestures of kindness and words of encouragement offered during the passage of this text toward competition, I would like to express strong sense of gratitude to my always supportive professors: Jim Bradford, Udo Greinacher, Aarati Kanekar, Elizabeth Riorden and David Saile, as well as to my colleagues and peer students: Elizabeth Bartley, Banu Bedel, Eszter Botos, Ellen Guerrettaz, Mihai Ivan, José Kozan, Tudor Rebengiuc and Aleksandra Simiü. This thesis could not have been finished without the encouragement and fortitude of my wife, Laura Traser-Vas, who shared the ups and downs of this long process with me. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT....................................................................................................................................... II KEYWORDS ....................................................................................................................................III DEDICATION ................................................................................................................................... V ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..................................................................................................................VI TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................... 1 ILLUSTRATIONS .............................................................................................................................. 2 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER ONE –TRADITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL REPRESENTATION TECHNIQUES ................ 11 CHAPTER OBJECTIVES ....................................................................................................... 11 THE FLATTENED SPACE –J.N.L.DURAND ........................................................................ 14 THE DISASSEMBLED AXONOMETRIC –AUGUSTE CHOISY................................................... 17 THE “ANALYTIC RUIN”–EUGÈNE-EMMANUEL VIOLLET-LE-DUC.................................... 21 ANALYTIC ROMANTICISM –GIOVANNI BATTISTA PIRANESI.............................................. 24 DEPICTIONS OF ANCIENT EGYPT –DAVID ROBERTS AND OTHERS .................................... 27 EVANESCENCE OF EXISTENCE –CASPAR DAVID FRIEDRICH.............................................. 32 CONCLUSION...................................................................................................................... 34 CHAPTER TWO –EXPLORING THE VIRTUAL WORLD................................................................. 37 CHAPTER OBJECTIVES ....................................................................................................... 37 IMAGES OF THE NO LONGER EXISTING .............................................................................. 39 MOVIES OF THE VIRTUAL................................................................................................... 44 INVISIBLE ARCHITECTURE ................................................................................................. 48 EXPLORING VIRTUAL REALITIES ....................................................................................... 51 CONCLUSION...................................................................................................................... 57 CHAPTER THREE –HISTORY AND RECONSTRUCTION................................................................ 59 CHAPTER OBJECTIVES ....................................................................................................... 59 THE CISTERCIANS .............................................................................................................. 60 History of the Cistercian Order............................................................................. 61 Cistercian Architecture ......................................................................................... 66 THE CISTERCIAN ABBEY OF PILIS ...................................................................................... 71 Location of the Site............................................................................................... 71 History of the Site before the Cistercians ............................................................. 72 The Era of Cistercian Foundations........................................................... 73 Between Two Invasions and Devastation ................................................. 75 The Site ................................................................................................................