Security, Justice and Governance in South East Myanmar

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Security, Justice and Governance in South East Myanmar REPORT SAFERWORLD AND KAREN PEACE SUPPORT NETWORK SUPPORT AND KAREN PEACE SAFERWORLD 1 SECURITY, JUSTICE AND GOVERNANCE IN SOUTH EAST MYANMAR Security, justice and governance in south east Myanmar SECURITY, JUSTICE AND GOVERNANCE IN SOUTH EAST MYANMAR AND GOVERNANCE JUSTICE SECURITY, A knowledge, attitudes and practices survey in Karen ceasefire areas January 2019 Security, justice and governance in south east Myanmar A knowledge, attitudes and practices survey in Karen ceasefire areas SAFERWORLD · KAREN PEACE SUPPORT NETWORK JANUARY 2019 © Saferworld, January 2019. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without full attribution. Saferworld welcomes and encourages the utilisation and dissemination of the material included in this publication. This research was funded by the Paung Sie Facility. All views expressed are explicitly those of Saferworld and the Karen Peace Support Network. Contents Foreword v Acknowledgements vi Maps viii Key terms, acronyms and abbreviations xi Executive summary xiii 1. Introduction and key findings 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Participants in this survey 8 1.3 Key findings: security, justice, governance and politics 13 2. Governance and legitimacy 19 2.1 Village-level governance 21 2.2 Perceptions and preferences regarding governance 28 2.3 Identity, governance and implications for peace 32 2.4 Armed actors that splintered from the KNU 35 2.5 Taxation 38 2.6 Understanding territory 42 3. Security forces and experiences of violence 51 3.1 Exposure to security forces 53 3.2 Violence and abuse perpetrated by authorities 56 3.3 Before and after the ceasefires 63 3.4 Perpetrators of violence and abuse 69 4. Justice 73 4.1 Attitudes towards justice 74 4.2 Actual justice cases 80 5. Peace and conflict 85 6. Conclusion and recommendations 91 6.1 Conclusion 91 6.2 Recommendations 94 6.3 Furthering the research agenda 98 References and bibliography 100 v Foreword SAFERWORLD AND THE KAREN PEACE SUPPORT NETWORK have been work- ing together since 2013 to identify the main conflict and security issues faced by Karen people in south east Myanmar and support locally driven efforts to achieve more peaceful, just and secure communities. The members of KPSN, as the largest network of Karen civil society organisations in southeast Myanmar, have decades of collective experience working to empower local Karen communities and advocate for a sustainable and equitable peace in Karen areas. Saferworld has been working in Myanmar since 2012, building on over three decades of international experience working with partners in conflict affected areas to prevent violence and build safer lives. The way that security, justice and governance is delivered and experienced lies at the heart of the complex factors that determine how Myanmar can move towards lasting peace. Since Saferworld and KPSN first formed a partnership in 2013, it has become increasingly apparent that without efforts to transform the security, justice and governance architecture in Myanmar, this goal will remain out of reach. Con- sequently, over the last six years KPSN and Saferworld have been working to make communities more secure and peaceful, and drawing on this experience to inform and influence authorities to be inclusive and more responsive and accountable to community needs. This knowledge, attitudes and practices survey is intended to improve understand- ing of the experiences of ordinary people living in areas affected by Myanmar’s most historic armed conflict between the Government of the Union of Myanmar and the Karen National Union. It draws on the experiences of over 2020 respond- ents from 72 villages randomly selected across rural ceasefire areas in Bago, Kayin, Mon and Tanintharyi. The findings demonstrate the complexity of the governance and territorial landscape, and how these dynamics are intrinsically tied to the pro- tracted conflict, the peace process, governance reforms and aid programmes. Although the subjects covered in this report are profoundly sensitive and complex, we hope that the recommendations to the Government of the Union of Myanmar, the Karen National Union and the international aid community will support efforts to address the root causes of conflict and insecurity in the Karen ceasefire areas of south east Myanmar. John Bainbridge Saw Alex Htoo Country Manager Chairperson Saferworld, Myanmar Karen Peace Support Network vi Acknowledgements From the Karen Peace Support Network advisory team This report would not have been possible without the information, effort and support provided by the range of organisations and individuals who dedicated their time, their efforts and their insights throughout the process. Special thanks to Saferworld for its valuable and effective technical and financial assistance in launching this survey and in developing this report. We are particularly appreciative to Kim Jolliffe and Gino C. Matibag for their technical support and coordination throughout the report process. Many thanks are extended to the wider Karen Peace Support Network for the valuable workshops and trainings attended by the partners' staff and volunteers who conducted practical work in the field. We would also like to express our thanks to the KNU local authorities, the Myanmar government local authorities, and all the respondents for their cooperation. From the Saferworld research team This report is the result of the collective efforts of many individuals. The Karen Peace Support Network was particularly instrumental in the research. Utmost acclaim should be given to the six team leaders and 50 enumerators provided by the Karen Peace Support Network, without whom the research and this report would not have been possible. The teams worked tirelessly and in a highly challenging environment through November 2017 until January 2018 to conduct more than 2,000 survey inter- views. The Karen Peace Support Network further provided an advisory team who ded- icated many hours of their time to give regular input into the initial conceptualisation of the research, the development of the methodology, the sampling of research loca- tions, the development of the questionnaire, the interpretation and analysis of the data, the development of key messages and recommendations and the co-drafting of the final report. Saferworld hired 11 data encoders, who we are also grateful to, who worked throughout January 2018 to enter all the data into our database. Kim Jolliffe was the author and lead researcher. Gino C. Matibag was the lead quantitative expert involved in the research. Dr Theo Hollander (Saferworld) supervised the research team and provided technical support and input during all the stages of the report production. John Bainbridge (Saferworld) and Saw Lin Chel (Saferworld) helped to conceptualise research objectives, developed the partnership with the Karen Peace Support Network, and provided substantial input during the report drafting process. Jared Bissinger provided further quantitative analysis of the data and reviewed the report, specifically ensuring the quality of the quantitative analysis. Diana Trimino (Saferworld) provided critical input on gender, as well as overall feedback on the data analysis and final analysis. Charlotte Watson (Saferworld) provided input at various stages of the research, including feedback during the drafting process. Dr Tamara Duffey-Janser (Saferworld) and Robert Parker (Saferworld) were responsible for the final review and quality control. The Myanmar Information Management Unit assisted with the creation of the maps. The report was copyedited by Jane Lanigan and reviewed by Jessica Summers (Saferworld), with important input from Elizabeth Bourne (Saferworld). The report also benefited from the external inputs and reviews by Susanne Kempel and Maria Helene Kyed. Unless indicated otherwise, all photographs © Aung Naing Soe/Saferworld. SAFERWORLD · KAREN PEACE SUPPORT NETWORK vii About the Karen Peace Support Network (KPSN) KPSN (formerly KCBPSN) is the largest network of Karen civil society organisations in Burma [Myanmar]. Its member organisations have been providing support for vulnerable people and communities in this conflict-torn region for decades, striving to empower local communities, build transparent and accountable institutions, and help create a sustainable peace in Burma. The network is dedicated to: n Raising awareness of the peace process and of human rights issues among Karen communities n Building the capacity of communities to advocate for and realise their rights n Providing practical support for communities to create sustainable livelihoods and improve their quality of life n Supporting Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) and returnees n Monitoring the peace process n Facilitating consultation and advocacy for a sustainable and equitable peace in Burma [Myanmar] KPSN member organisations and allies: Organisation Acronym 1 Back Pack Health Worker Team BPHWT 2 Karen Affairs Committee KAC 3 Karen Development Committee KDC 4 Karen Education Department KED 5 Karen Environmental and Social Action Network KESAN 6 Karen Human Rights Group KHRG 7 Karen Office for Relief and Development KORD 8 Karen Refugee Committee KRC 9 Karen Rivers Watch KRW 10 Karen Student Network Group KSNG 11 Karen Teacher Working Group KTWG 12 Karen Women’s Empowerment Group KWEG 13 Karen Women’s Organization KWO 14 Karen Youth Organization KYO 15 Mae Tao
Recommended publications
  • Report of Assessment of Impact of Covid-19 on Value Chains of Durian in Kawkareik and Thantaungyi Townships of Myanmar
    REPORT OF ASSESSMENT OF IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON VALUE CHAINS OF DURIAN IN KAWKAREIK AND THANTAUNGYI TOWNSHIPS OF MYANMAR October 2020 Report of Assessment of COVID-19 on Value Chains of Durian EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Background and Methodology The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis has severely disrupted agricultural value chains and markets and has a significant impact on the economic performance of the agricultural sector. In order to effectively respond to the crisis, to mitigate negative impacts and contribute to economic recovery by the projects with funding support from the International Fund for Agriculture Development (IFAD), it is necessary to know the scope of the disruption, its direct and indirect consequences and potential areas/anchor points for interventions. For the above reasons, the Value Chain Capacity Building Network (VCB-N) proposes to conduct country-based assessments of the consequences of the COVID-19 crises. EMPOWER Consultancy Limited is commissioned to carry out this assessment with an overall objective of providing IFAD and its stakeholders impact of the COVID-19 crises on the economic and social performance of Durian value chains in Kawkareik and Thantaunggyi Townships of IFAD’s Eastern State project and formulating recommendations for short and mid-term level responses to mitigate negative impacts and contribute to recovery of these value chains. In order to meet the overall objectives, the specific objectives are set to: (1). examine the impact of affected chain performance such as income, poverty, food security and employment taking into account immediate and mid-term perspectives; (2). assess changes in trade arrangements, transaction costs and trade volumes and related economic consequences for chain actors; and (3).
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Briefing Note Southeastern Myanmar 5-11 June 2021 (Limited Distribution)
    Weekly Briefing Note Southeastern Myanmar 5-11 June 2021 (Limited Distribution) This weekly briefing note, covering humanitarian developments in Southeastern Myanmar from 5 June to 11 June, is produced by the Kayin Inter-Agency Coordination of the Southeastern Myanmar Working Group. Highlights • The import of soap, detergent and toothpaste from Thailand through the Myawaddy border was suspended on 4 June, according to a letter of notification from the Trades Department.1 • In Kayin State, clashes between the Tatmadaw and Karen National Union (KNU) was observed in Kyainseikgyi, Hpapun and Myawaddy townships and Thandaung town during the week. • A letter ordering the suspension of activities and temporary closure of offices of INGOs in Tanintharyi Region was issued by the Department of Social Welfare on 2 June. The closure of INGOs offices is likely to impact access to services and assistance by vulnerable people in the region. • The Karen National Liberation Army's (KNLA) Chief, General Saw Johny released a statement on 9 June, indicating that the KNLA and its members will follow political leadership of the Karen National Union (KNU). According to the statement signed by Gen. Saw Johny, the KNLA will follow the announcement that was released by the KNU's chairman Saw Mutu Say Poe on 10 May and will follow the framework of the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement (NCA) signed by the KNU. The statement also stated that KNLA members must comply with the military rules of the KNLA.2 • The security situation continues to deteriorate in Kayah State. Over 100,000 remain displaced as clashes and military reinforcements brought in by the Tatmadaw continued throughout the week.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Briefing Note Southeastern Myanmar 22 - 28 May 2021 (Limited Distribution)
    Weekly Briefing Note Southeastern Myanmar 22 - 28 May 2021 (Limited Distribution) This weekly briefing note, covering humanitarian developments in Southeastern Myanmar from 22 to 28 May, is produced by the Kayin Inter-Agency Coordination of the Southeastern Myanmar Working Group. Highlights • The humanitarian situation severely deteriorated throughout Kayah State, especially in Loikaw and Demoso Townships over the week and has resulted in the displacement of more than 70,000 people since 20 May 2021. • Clashes between the Karen National Union (KNU) and Myanmar Military Forces (MAF) continued in Kayin State and Eastern Bago. • Armed conflict, movement restrictions, landmine risks and displacement continue to severely impact communities, particularly in socio-economic terms. Commodity prices have increased, unemployment is high, and local populations are unable to continue their livelihoods activities. • In areas where fighting is more sporadic, Internally Displaced Populations (IDPs) remain in hiding due to the unpredictability of the situation and fear of further attacks, particularly airstrikes. • Displaced populations continue to have limited access to food, shelter, hygiene and sanitation. Humanitarian Situation The security situation continues to be tense in southeastern Myanmar with indiscriminate mortar shelling, deployment of armed forces and explosions in various locations. Intensified clashes were particularly observed in Kayah State, eastern Bago Region and Kayin State during the week. In Kayin State, clashes between the Karen National Union (KNU) and the Myanmar Armed Forces (MAF) were observed in Ma Htaw and Khway Thay villages in Hpapun Township on 21 and 22 May 20211 2 3 and in Wah Lu, Mae Waing, Hpar Loh Doh and Hpar Loh Pho areas, as well as on the road between Hpapun and Ka Taing Ti in Hpapun Township on 24 and 25 May 2021.4 5 Two landmine incidents were reported from Hpapun Township, near War Tho Kho village, on the road between Kamamaung and Hpapun on 24 and 25 May 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Forced Relocation and Destruction of Villagers’ Shelters by Burma/Myanmar Government Officials and Police in Hpa-An Township, Thaton District, June 2015
    News Bulletin August 26, 2015 / KHRG #15-14-NB1 Forced relocation and destruction of villagers’ shelters by Burma/Myanmar government officials and police in Hpa-an Township, Thaton District, June 2015 This News Bulletin describes an incident in which the Burma/Myanmar government police force and Burma/Myanmar Department of Forest Management destroyed and burnt down 97 villager houses, displacing approximately 500 villagers in B--- village, Hpa-an Township, Thaton District in June 2015. Despite holding Karen National Union (KNU) issued land grants, villagers were ordered by the Burma/Myanmar government to move out of their village since the government demarcated the area as a forest reserve. However, villagers reported that this land was the location of their old village, which they had to leave behind in 1983 during altercations between the Tatmadaw and the Karen National Liberation Army (KNLA). The villagers also noted that even though the government demarcated the land as a forest reserve, there are no big teak or ironwood trees there. In addition, businessmen from Hpa-an Town came and planted rubber trees and the Tatmadaw sometimes use the area for target practice. The Chief Minister of Kayin State, U Zaw Min, threatened villagers into signing a document stating they agree to dismantle their houses and would not live on that land anymore. In attempting to prevent the destruction of their village, villagers sought help from Saw P---, who attempted to advocate on their behalf, to no avail. When the villagers refused to dismantle their village, the Burma/Myanmar government police arrested 25 villagers, one monk and one KNU/KNLA- Peace Council (KNU/KNLA-PC) member and continued to raid the village, burning and looting villagers’ houses, and planting teak trees.
    [Show full text]
  • The Myanmar-Thailand Corridor 6 the Myanmar-Malaysia Corridor 16 the Myanmar-Korea Corridor 22 Migration Corridors Without Labor Attachés 25
    Online Appendixes Public Disclosure Authorized Labor Mobility As a Jobs Strategy for Myanmar STRENGTHENING ACTIVE LABOR MARKET POLICIES TO ENHANCE THE BENEFITS OF MOBILITY Public Disclosure Authorized Mauro Testaverde Harry Moroz Public Disclosure Authorized Puja Dutta Public Disclosure Authorized Contents Appendix 1 Labor Exchange Offices in Myanmar 1 Appendix 2 Forms used to collect information at Labor Exchange Offices 3 Appendix 3 Registering jobseekers and vacancies at Labor Exchange Offices 5 Appendix 4 The migration process in Myanmar 6 The Myanmar-Thailand corridor 6 The Myanmar-Malaysia corridor 16 The Myanmar-Korea corridor 22 Migration corridors without labor attachés 25 Appendix 5 Obtaining an Overseas Worker Identification Card (OWIC) 29 Appendix 6 Obtaining a passport 30 Cover Photo: Somrerk Witthayanant/ Shutterstock Appendix 1 Labor Exchange Offices in Myanmar State/Region Name State/Region Name Yangon No (1) LEO Tanintharyi Dawei Township Office Yangon No (2/3) LEO Tanintharyi Myeik Township Office Yangon No (3) LEO Tanintharyi Kawthoung Township Office Yangon No (4) LEO Magway Magwe Township Office Yangon No (5) LEO Magway Minbu District Office Yangon No (6/11/12) LEO Magway Pakokku District Office Yangon No (7) LEO Magway Chauk Township Office Yangon No (8/9) LEO Magway Yenangyaung Township Office Yangon No (10) LEO Magway Aunglan Township Office Yangon Mingalardon Township Office Sagaing Sagaing District Office Yangon Shwe Pyi Thar Township Sagaing Monywa District Office Yangon Hlaing Thar Yar Township Sagaing Shwe
    [Show full text]
  • Fberuary Newsletter 2018
    FBERUARY NEWSLETTER 2018 TRAININGS Ta’ang, Burmese, Lahu, Karen, Danu, and Pa’O backgrounds. Hsipaw Township has faced land Human Rights, Documentation of Human confiscation. Rights Violations and Transitional Justice Training in Shan State These training served as a capacity building measures, aiming to encourage and inform the As a part of the series of regular Human Rights, participants in the democratic setup. Documentation of Human Rights Violations and Transitional Justice Training, the Assistance Association for Political Prisoners (Burma) held two long trainings in the month of February. A 10- day Training from February 6-15 was organized in Namhsam City in Pa Laung Self-administered Zone in Northern Shan State and a 11-day Training from February 16-26 was held in Hsipaw City, Northern Shan State. In Namhsam City, the Training was administered by AAPP’s Human Rights Trainer, Ko Saw Than Hlaing, and Human Rights, Human Rights Documentation, and Transitional Justice Trainer, Ko Sai Myint Thu. A total of 32 people including 25 females and seven males participated in the Transitional Justice training in Nant training. Participants, all of Palaung background, Hsan, Shan State included village youths, students, heads of health organisations, village administrators, and National League for Democracy (NLD) representatives. Namhsam Township has faced issues with restriction on movement, torture by the village administrators, and human trafficking. In Hsipaw City, the Training was administered by AAPP’s Human Rights Trainer, Ma Zun Pang, and Human Rights Documentation and Transitional Justice Trainer, Ko Tin Myo Htut. A total of 26 people including 16 females and ten males participated in the training.
    [Show full text]
  • Kayin State Economy Overview Kayin State Profile: Location: Southern Myanmar Shared Borders: Mandalay Division and Shan State To
    Kayin State Economy Overview Kayin State Profile: Location: Southern Myanmar Shared borders: Mandalay Division and Shan State to the north Kayah State and Thailand to the east Bago Division and Mon State to the west Area: 30,383 sq. km Ethnicity: the area was previously known as Karen State, and is mainly inhabited by Karen ethnicities, which are also known as Sagaw Karen, Pwo Karen, Bwe Karen, Paku Karen, and other ethnicities, such as Mon, Shan, Burmese, and Pa-O. Population: 1,504,079 (Myanmar National Population and Housing Census 2014) Population density: 51. 8 persons per square kilometer, which ranks 10th in state population density in Myanmar. For the population in urban and rural areas, the census results showed that for every 100 persons, 78 persons lived in rural areas while 22 persons live in urban areas. The Population Pyramid of Kayin State, 2014 Source: 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census Geography Kayin state is formed of 4 districts, 7 townships and 458 villages with 30,383 sq. km area of land. The lowland areas, especially in the west, practice rice farming. In the east, many areas are hilly and covered with forests, with people practicing upland farming. The rocky Dawna Mountain range runs along the length of Kayin state in the east, and the southern and western parts of Kayin state, particularly around Hpa-An area. Air and Rail Transport Kayin State lacks railway infrastructure. The main rail line is only linked to the closest town in Mon State. The airport in Hpa-An and Pha-pun are rarely used for domestic and international flights.
    [Show full text]
  • The Situation in Karen State After the Elections PAPER No
    EBO ANALYSIS The Situation in Karen State after the Elections PAPER No. 1 2011 THE SITUATION IN KAREN STATE AFTER THE ELECTIONS EBO Analysis Paper No. 1/2011 For over sixty years the Karens have been fighting the longest civil war in recent history. The struggle, which has seen demands for an autonomous state changed to equal recognition within a federal union, has been bloody and characterized by a number of splits within the movement. While all splinter groups ostensibly split to further ethnic Karen aspirations; recent decisions by some to join the Burmese government’s Border Guard Force (BGF) is seen as an end to such aspirations. Although a number of Karen political parties were formed to contest the November elections, the likelihood of such parties seriously securing appropriate ethnic representation without regime capitulation is doubtful. While some have argued, perhaps correctly, that the only legitimate option was to contest the elections, the closeness of some Karen representatives to the current regime can only prolong the status quo. This papers examines the problems currently affecting Karen State after the 7 November elections. THE BORDER GUARD FORCE Despite original promises of being allowed to recruit a total of 9,000 troops, the actual number of the DKBA (Democratic Karen Buddhist Army) or Karen Border Guard Force has been reduced considerably. In fact, a number of the original offers made to the DKBA have been revoked. At a 7 May 2010 meeting held at Myaing Gyi Ngu, DKBA Chairman U Tha Htoo Kyaw stated that ‘According to the SE Commander, the BGF will retain the DKBA badge.’ In fact the DKBA were given uniforms with SPDC military patches and all Karen flags in DKBA areas were removed and replaced by the national flag.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 ERF Annual Report
    Humanitarian Multi-Stakeholder Fund Myanmar Credit: ADRA Myanmar Annual Report 2012 Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs Humanitarian Multi-Stakeholder Fund – Myanmar Annual Report 2012 Note from the Humanitarian Coordinator The Humanitarian Multi-Stakeholder Fund (HMSF) is In 2012, the HMSF demonstrated that it is an essential the Emergency Response Fund for Myanmar. The HMSF humanitarian funding tool that addresses urgent needs of provides rapid and flexible funding to address the urgent displaced people in remote areas in Myanmar where humanitarian needs of people in insecure areas, including access remains limited for the international community. those internally displaced. This in-country funding During the reporting period, the HMSF supported five mechanism facilitates the coordination of emergency projects implemented by five international non- response activities, strengthens partnerships, and governmental organisations (INGO) in partnership with complements existing funding channels in Myanmar. It five CBOs. enables humanitarian partners to meet the short-term emergency needs of vulnerable communities. The HMSF The establishment of partnerships between INGOs and is not intended to support activities that are outside the CBOs proved to be a successful strategy, enabling the scope of the humanitarian response or which could be HMSF to reach a wider number of beneficiaries and to better addressed through development channels. develop the capacity of local organisations. The international community’s determination to support Through the implementation of HMSF-funded projects, humanitarian operations in Myanmar has led to various around 35,000 people received assistance in 2012. creative initiatives to ensure those most in need are assisted. The HMSF represents an innovative approach to Project activities impacted the life of beneficiaries by: targeting populations otherwise inaccessible to improving access to safe and clean water; improving international agencies and organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Book of Political Parties in Myanmar
    Myanmar Development Research (MDR) (Present) Enlightened Myanmar Research (EMR) Wing (3), Room (A-305) Thitsar Garden Housing. 3 Street , 8 Quarter. South Okkalarpa Township. Yangon, Myanmar +951 562439 Acknowledgement of Myanmar Development Research This edition of the “Fact Book of Political Parties in Myanmar (2010-2012)” is the first published collection of facts and information of political parties which legally registered at the Union Election Commission since the pre-election period of Myanmar’s milestone 2010 election and the post-election period of the 2012 by-elections. This publication is also an important milestone for Myanmar Development Research (MDR) as it is the organization’s first project that was conducted directly in response to the needs of civil society and different stakeholders who have been putting efforts in the process of the political transition of Myanmar towards a peaceful and developed democratic society. We would like to thank our supporters who made this project possible and those who worked hard from the beginning to the end of publication and launching ceremony. In particular: (1) Heinrich B�ll Stiftung (Southeast Asia) for their support of the project and for providing funding to publish “Fact Book of Political Parties in Myanmar (2010-2012)”. (2) Party leaders, the elected MPs, record keepers of the 56 parties in this book who lent their valuable time to contribute to the project, given the limited time frame and other challenges such as technical and communication problems. (3) The Chairperson of the Union Election Commission and all the members of the Commission for their advice and contributions.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving the Incomes and Nutrition Outcomes of Rural Poor in Northern Kayin State: Nutritional Causal Analysis
    Improving the Incomes and Nutrition Outcomes of Rural Poor in Northern Kayin State: Nutritional Causal Analysis Consortium partners: Consortium of Dutch NGO’s (CDN) World Concern Myanmar (WCM) Cordaid Advisory partner: SNV Local implementing partners: Taungoo Thandawn Bwe Moh Bwa Karen Baptist Association (BMB) Taungoo Kehko Kehbah Karen Baptist Association (KKBA) Taungoo Paku Karen Baptist (PKBA) Karuna Myanmar Social Services (KMSS) NCA Consultants: Mekong Economics Myanmar October 2016 – January 2017 P a g e | 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Figures ........................................................................................................................... 2 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ 3 List of Acronyms .......................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 4 1 Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 7 Nutrition Causal Analysis (NCA) .......................................................................................................... 7 NCA in Kayin ........................................................................................................................................ 8 2 Context .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Read the WASH Assessment
    WASH ASSESSMENT Kayin, Myanmar From august 19th to 31th 2019 / Report date: September 6th 2019 Authors: Timothée LE GUELLEC (PUI), Thomas Monnet, Loïc Bruckert (Aquassistance) SOMMAIRE Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………................................. 1 Context……………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………... 1 General context………………………………………………………………………………………………….……… 1 Mission scope …………………………………………………………………………………….…………................ 2 Main findings……………………………………………….…………………………………………………….……... 3 Access to water, sanitation and hygiene…………..……………………………………………………….……… 3 Governance……………………………………….………….…………………………………………………… 3 Water availability…………………………………………….………………………………………………….… 4 Water quality…………………………………………………………………………………………………….… 5 Sanitation and hygiene…………………………………………………………………………………………… 7 WaSH in Schools………………………………………………..…………………………………….……….… 8 WaSH in health care facilities…………………………………………………………………….……………… 9 WaSH in camps……………………………………………………………………………………………………10 Logistics and market……………………………………………………………………………………………..……. 11 Equipment and material………………………………………………………………………………..………… 11 Services providers…………………………………………………………………………………………………11 Roads conditions and transportation…………………………………………………………….………………11 Constraints and opportunities……………………………………………………………………...…………………11 Recommendations………………………………………………………………………………………………………12 Long term WaSH strategy…………………………………………………………………………………...…………12 Foster coordination between state and non-state actors………………………………………………………12 Improve and monitor water quality…………………………………………………………………………….…12
    [Show full text]