DOCSLIB.ORG

Of the Redgate Golf Course in Rockville, MD

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Of the Redgate Golf Course in Rockville, MD Business Analysis of the RedGate Golf Course in Rockville, MD Prepared For: City of Rockville Recreation and Parks 111 Maryland Avenue Rockville, MD 20850 Prepared By: 501 N. Highway A1a Jupiter, FL 33477 (561) 744-6006 January 2019 Table of Contents GENERAL LIMITING CONDITIONS .......................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 2 Introduction And Purpose .................................................................................................... 2 NGF Review – 2018 ............................................................................................................ 3 Overall Summary of Findings .............................................................................................. 4 Key findings on RedGate Golf Course .......................................................................................... 4 External Environment .......................................................................................................... 5 NGF Recommendations ...................................................................................................... 6 Basic Oversight and Golf Course Management ............................................................................ 7 Operational Recommendations ..................................................................................................... 7 Physical Improvements / Capital Investment ................................................................................ 7 Financial Analysis ............................................................................................................... 8 NGF Projection Results ................................................................................................................. 8 Summary Statement ........................................................................................................... 9 Summary of Opportunities and Challenges................................................................................. 10 SUBJECT FACILITY – REDGATE GOLF COURSE ................................................................11 RedGate Golf Course Facility Overview .............................................................................11 Location, Access and Surrounding Elements ............................................................................. 12 RedGate Golf Course Facility Review ................................................................................14 Golf Course Review ..................................................................................................................... 14 Existing Golf Course Conditions Review ..................................................................................... 15 Additional Amenities and Structures Review............................................................................... 22 RedGate GC Capital Investment Considerations ........................................................................ 26 Review of Golf Operations .................................................................................................28 Contract Management Review .................................................................................................... 28 Lease Termination Issues ........................................................................................................... 29 Oversight and Staffing ................................................................................................................. 30 Technology and Marketing .......................................................................................................... 31 Golf Playing Fees ........................................................................................................................ 32 Other Operational Issues............................................................................................................. 33 RedGate GC Operational Performance ..............................................................................34 Rounds Played at RedGate GC .................................................................................................. 34 RedGate Golf Course Revenue .................................................................................................. 36 RedGate Golf Course Expenses ................................................................................................. 37 Review of Ancillary Operations (F&B Operation, Pro Shop & Driving Range) ............................ 39 The RedGate Golf Course Financial Summary ........................................................................... 40 Summary – RedGate Golf Course ......................................................................................41 EXTERNAL FACTORS AFFECTING THE OPERATION OF REDGATE GC ...........................43 National Golf Foundation Consulting, Inc. – RedGate GC FINAL Report Demographics, Economy and Weather ..............................................................................43 Demographic Analysis – Local Permanent Residents ................................................................ 43 Key Economic Factors................................................................................................................. 44 Golf Market Supply and Demand Indicators .......................................................................46 National Golf Industry Overview .................................................................................................. 46 Market Definition – Primary and Secondary Trade Areas ........................................................... 47 Local Golf Demand ...................................................................................................................... 47 Other Demand Drivers................................................................................................................. 48 Local Golf Supply ........................................................................................................................ 48 Golf Course Market Supply / Demand Summary ........................................................................ 49 Local Competitive Golf Market ...........................................................................................50 Competitive Public Access Golf Facilities Map ........................................................................... 50 Summary Information .................................................................................................................. 51 Market Area Rounds and Fee Information .................................................................................. 52 Montgomery County Revenue Authority (MCRA) Golf Network ................................................. 54 Key Findings – Competitive Golf Market ..................................................................................... 56 External Factors Summary .................................................................................................58 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CITY OF ROCKVILLE ........................................................59 NGF Observations on RedGate Golf Course ......................................................................59 Basic Oversight and Structure ............................................................................................60 Structure Options ......................................................................................................................... 60 NGF Recommendation ................................................................................................................ 62 Physical Improvement Recommendations .........................................................................62 Completion of Basic Repairs ....................................................................................................... 63 Operational Recommendations ..........................................................................................63 Technology and Marketing .......................................................................................................... 63 Player Development and Programming ...................................................................................... 65 ANALYSIS OF EXPECTED REDGATE GOLF COURSE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE ........66 RedGate GC Projections (2019-2023)................................................................................66 Basic Assumptions ...................................................................................................................... 66 Activity and Revenue Assumptions – RGGC (2019-2023) ......................................................... 66 Expense Assumptions ................................................................................................................. 67 Economic Performance Projections – 2019-2023 ....................................................................... 70 Summary Discussion – NGF Projections ............................................................................71 Limiting Conditions ...................................................................................................................... 71 SUMMARY STATEMENT .........................................................................................................72 APPENDICES...........................................................................................................................73
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 10400 Detrick Avenue Kensington, Maryland 20895 240-627-9425
    REVISED: 2/7/2018 10400 Detrick Avenue Kensington, Maryland 20895 240-627-9425 EXPANDED AGENDA February 7, 2018 Res. # 4:00 p.m. I. Election of Officers Chair Vice Chair Chair Pro Tem 4:15 p.m. II. CONSENT ITEMS Page 4 A. Approval of Minutes of January 10, 2018 4:25 p.m. III. INFORMATION EXCHANGE A. Community Forum Page 19 B. Report of the Executive Director 22 C. Calendar D. Commissioner Exchange E. Resident Advisory Board 4:40 p.m. IV. ADMINISTRATIVE AND SPECIAL SESSIONS ACTIONS Page 25 A. Ratification of Action Taken in Administrative Session on January 10, 18-07R(pg. 26) 2018: Authorization to Form a New Entity for The Acquisition of an Existing Multifamily Development 27 B. Ratification of Action Taken in Administrative Session on January 10, 18-08R(pg. 28) 29 2018: Approval to Add Ten (10) Additional Rental Assistance 18-09R(pg. 30) Demonstration (“RAD”) Vouchers to a New Multifamily Development; and Approval for Conditional Investment in a New Multifamily Development 31 C. Ratification of Action Taken in Administrative Session on January 31, 18-10R(pg. 32) 2018 – Approval to Temporarily Increase the PNC Lines of Credit to Fund The Acquisition of an Existing Multifamily Development 33 D. Ratification of Action Taken in Administrative Session on January 31, 18-11R(pg. 34) 35 2018 – Approval to a) Complete the Acquisition of an Existing 18-12R(pg. 36) Multifamily Development; b) to Fund the Acquisition, and c) to Select a Management Company for the Development; and Approval to Draw on the PNC Lines of Credit to Fund the Acquisition of an Existing Multifamily Development 37 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Rockville Reports Feb. 2020
    FEBRUARY 2020 • VOL. 66 #2 CELEBRATEYEAR. LUNAR THISSEE STORYPAGE. NEW • FIND MORE CITY NEWS AT WWW.ROCKVILLEMD.GOV • Enforcement and Education Are City Hall and Some City Facilities to Close for Focus of Strategy for Safer Streets Presidents Day Rockville is continuing its include: City Hall will be closed and push for safer city streets for • Patrols directed to address recycling and trash will not be all with renewed enforcement community concerns. collected on Monday, Feb. 17, in and education efforts. • An educational and enforce- observance of Presidents Day. The Rockville City Police ment effort in Town Center Several city facilities will oper- Department began the new that has distributed over ate on their usual schedule. year by redeploying patrol of- 500 educational brochures Recycling and trash collec- ficers to traffic patrol and fo- and issued citations and tion will not be collected on cusing enforcement efforts on warnings. Presidents Day. Collections high-incident areas. • Increased emphasis on will occur one day later City Opposes I-270 Widening A map of bicycle and pe- bringing criminal charges, throughout the week. For more destrian crashes from 2017- when appropriate, in pedes- information, call 240-314-8568 The Mayor and Council facilities, the letter said. 2019, presented during the trian-involved crashes. or visit www.rockvillemd.gov/ continued efforts last month to The Mayor and Council have Dec. 16 Mayor and Council • Greater statistical analy- recycling-trash. oppose a state project to widen actively engaged with the state meeting, shows a concentra- sis of pedestrian-involved On Monday, Feb. 17: interstates 270 and 495 over the about this proposed project, en- tion of incidents in Rockville crashes.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Notices
    JULY 26, 2007 THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY SENTINEL L-1 LEGAL NOTICES SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEES SALE SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEES SALE SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEES SALE SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEES SALE chase price sustained by the Trustees or the Noteholder, all costs and expenses of both sales, reasona- Law Offices of ble attorneys' fees, and any other damages sustained by the Trustees or the Noteholder, including, Gebhardt & Smith LLP without limitation, all incidental damages. If the Trustees are unable to convey the Property as descri- One South Street, Suite 2200 bed above, the purchaser's sole remedy at law or in equity shall be limited to a refund of the afore- Baltimore, Maryland 21202 mentioned deposit, without interest thereon. Upon refund of the deposit to the purchaser(s) as afore- said, the sale shall be void and of no effect, and the purchaser(s) shall have no further claim against SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEES’ SALE OF VALUABLE UNIMPROVED LAND the Trustees, the Noteholder or the auctioneer conducting the sale of the Property. The parties' re- LOCATED ON METROPOLITAN GROVE ROAD, GAITHERSBURG, MARYLAND spective rights and obligations regarding the terms of sale and the conduct of the sale shall be gov- erned by and interpreted according to the laws of the State of Maryland. Under and by virtue of the power of sale contained in that certain Deed of Trust, dated October 23, 2003 ("Deed of Trust"), from Kevin Howard ("Grantor") to Arrel E. Godfrey and Charles R. David V. Fontana and Kenneth R. Rhoad, Carder, IV, Trustees, which such Deed of Trust is recorded among the Land Records of Montgomery Substitute Trustees County, Maryland at Liber 25878, page 267, the holder of the indebtedness secured by said Deed of For further information, please contact: Trust ("Noteholder") having subsequently appointed David V.
    [Show full text]
  • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Planning Commission
    MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Planning Commission VIA: Tony Tomasello, City Manager FROM: John Schlichting, Director of Planning and Code Administration DATE: June 29, 2018 SUBJECT: Residential development impacts from the MCPS FY 2019 Capital Budget and the FY 2019-2024 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) The latest Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) FY 2019 Capital Budget and the FY 2019-2024 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) was recently approved by the Montgomery County Council on May 24, 2018. The information in this memo is based upon the City’s Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (APFO) and the forthcoming FY 2019 Educational Facilities Master Plan and the FY 2019-2024 CIP. Note that the FY 2019 Master Plan CIP is scheduled to be published July 2018, and will be available at http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/planning/cipmaster.aspx. Staff has spoken with MCPS staff and no significant changes are expected in the final published Master Plan CIP. Attached for your review are the relevant materials for the following high school clusters, which City of Gaithersburg residents attend: Gaithersburg Quince Orchard Colonel Zadok Magruder Watkins Mill Northwest Thomas S. Wootton Pursuant to the City’s APFO (Chapter 24, Article XV) adopted January 2, 2007 and amended October 19, 2009; April 16, 2012; and October 12, 2015; school capacity exists to support residential development at all locations within the City of Gaithersburg. A map has been provided illustrating that no area of the City is under City APFO moratorium. Two additional maps show those areas under moratorium or conditionally open, based upon the County Subdivision Staging Policy (SSP) test.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Executive Summary Taxpayers spend an extraordinary amount of money to maintain and expand America’s network of roads, rails, bridges, bike paths, and sidewalks. With this investment, we have a right to expect fair and efficient use of our tax dollars. Unfortunately, the current system instead wastes billions of dollars on inefficient and unnecessary projects and fails to equitably balance all transportation needs. The majority of surface transportation money is spent on highways and roads. In 20001, federal, state, and local taxpayers spent approximately $104 billion on highways, and $27.8 billion of that total came from federal funds. Transit spending that year totaled $32.4 billion, with $5.3 billion from federal funds.2 Federal policy has created a system where highway projects receive more money and are more easily approved than other transportation projects, yet highway projects are subject to less federal oversight. The resulting inefficiency has created a situation in which spending on highways has soared to record levels, yet congestion is increasing and many of our existing roads and bridges remain in disrepair. Road to Ruin highlights 27 proposed federal-aid highway projects from every region in the country. All of these projects face significant public opposition because they would waste tax dollars and cause significant and unnecessary harm to communities, the environment, and public health. Hundreds of projects were reviewed for Road to Ruin. Each highlights problems with federal transportation spending and raises questions about how transportation projects are approved. Federal taxpayers would be forced to spend more than $24 billion to construct these projects, based on conservative cost estimates.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Hearing Draft Plan of the Shady Grove
    THE MARYLAND - NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION Abstract This Sector Plan contains the text and supporting maps for a comprehensive amendment to the approved and adopted 2006 Shady Grove Sector Plan, as amended. It also amends The General Plan (On Wedges and Corridors) for the Physical Development of the Maryland-Washington Regional District in Montgomery and Prince George’s counties, as amended, the Master Plan of Highways and Transitways, as amended, and the Bicycle Master Plan, as amended. This Plan focuses on land use and zoning recommendations primarily surrounding the Shady Grove Metro Station, as well as mobility options, urban design and public facilities. This Plan area is also adjacent to the municipalities of Rockville, Gaithersburg and the Town of Washington Grove. Master and sector plans convey land use policy for defined geographic areas and should be interpreted together with relevant Countywide functional plans and County laws and regulations. Plan recommendations provide comprehensive guidelines for the use of public and private land; and should be referred to by public officials and private individuals when making land use decisions. Public and private land use decisions that promote plan goals are essential to fulling a plan’s vision. Master and sector plans look ahead 20 years from the date of the adoption, although they are intended to be revised every 10 to 15 years. Moreover, the circumstances when a plan is adopted will change and the specifics of a plan may become less relevant over time. Plans do not specify all development possibilities. Their sketches are for illustrative purposes only, intended to convey a sense of desirable future character rather than detailed recommendations for a particular design.
    [Show full text]
  • 10400 Detrick Avenue Kensington, Maryland 20895 240-627-9425 EXPANDED AGENDA November 1, 2017 Res. # 3:30 P.M. I. ADMINISTRATIV
    10400 Detrick Avenue Kensington, Maryland 20895 240-627-9425 EXPANDED AGENDA November 1, 2017 Res. # 3:30 p.m. I. ADMINISTRATIVE SESSION – HOC Board (Closed) Pursuant to Section 3-305(b)(1) of the General Article of the Annotated Code of the State of Maryland, this Administrative Session will be called to order to discuss personnel matter 4:00 p.m. II. CONSENT ITEMS Separate Cover A. Approval of Minutes of September 6, 2017 “ “ B. Approval of Minutes of October 4, 2017 4:05 p.m. III. INFORMATION EXCHANGE A. Community Forum 7 B. Report of the Executive Director 11 C. Calendar D. Commissioner Exchange E. Resident Advisory Board 4:45 p.m. IV. ADMINISTRATIVE AND SPECIAL SESSIONS ACTIONS Page 14 A. Ratification of Action Taken in Administrative Session on October 17-70R (pg. 15) 17, 2017: Approval of Predevelopment Funding and Authorization to Enter into a Predevelopment Agreement for Affordable Housing Units 4:50 p.m. V. COMMITTEE REPORTS and RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACTION A. Budget, Finance and Audit Committee – Com. Nelson, Chair Page 18 1. Approval of CY’18 Tax Credit Partnership Budgets 17-71 (pg. 24) 41 2. Authorization to Submit FY’19 County Operating Budget 17-72 (pg. 44) 45 3. Approval to Extend the Banking Services Contract with PNC 17-73 (pg. 48) Bank, N.A. 50 4. Approval of Extension of Property Assistance Contract 17-74 (pg. 60) 61 5. Approval of Management Contract for Spring Garden 17-75 (pg. 71) 72 6. Approval of Contract for Barclay Square and Fairfax Court 17-76 (pg.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Plan
    Gaithersburg A Character Counts! City City of Gaithersburg LAND USE PLAN 2003 MASTER1 PLAN Master Plan: Land Use Plan, April 6, 2004 CITY OF GAITHERSBURG 2003 MASTER PLAN MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Mayor Sidney A. Katz Council Vice President Ann T. Somerset Council Member Stanley J. Alster Council Member Geri Edens Council Member Henry F. Marraffa, Jr. Council Member John B. Schlichting PLANNING COMMISSION Chairperson Blanche Keller Commissioner John Bauer Commissioner Victor Hicks Commissioner Leonard Levy Commissioner Danielle L. Winborne CITY MANAGER David B. Humpton PLANNING AND CODE ADMINISTRATION Long Range Planning Team: Mark DePoe, Long Range Planning Director Kirk Eby, GIS Planner Daniel Janousek, Planner CITY OF GAITHERSBURG 2003 MASTER PLAN CHAPTER 2 LAND USE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 LAND USE AND ZONING CATEGORIES 2 MAP DESIGNATIONS 3 SPECIAL STUDY AREAS 92 Background 93 Casey-Goshen Tract 94 Muddy Branch 100 Washingtonian Center 105 Casey-Metropolitan Grove 113 Uptonís-Boston Market 132 Prepared By: Planning and Code Administration Long Range Planning Team: Mark DePoe, Long Range Planning Director Kirk Eby, GIS Planner Daniel Janousek, Planner April 6, 2004 1 MASTER PLAN: LAND USE PLAN Master Plan: Land Use Plan, April 6, 2004 INTRODUCTION The City of Gaithersburg is empowered under Article 66B (the Maryland Planning and Zoning Enabling Act) of the Annotated Code of Maryland to exercise autonomous planning and zoning powers as described. Article 66B, added to the Maryland Code in 1927 and now entitled Zoning and Planning, delegates basic planning and land use regulatory powers to the Stateís municipalities. Section 3.05, of Article 66B, mandates that a land use plan element be included in a Master Plan document.
    [Show full text]
  • Fountain Lakes Commerce Center QUALIFIED SITE Hwy 370 & Elm, Saint Charles, MO
    Site 1 (Lots H - O) City of Saint Charles, MO Fountain Lakes Commerce Center QUALIFIED SITE Hwy 370 & Elm, Saint Charles, MO Site 1 Information Community Information Lot Lot H/I/J L/N O MSA Population 2,811,588 Size 18.61 Ac 13.35 Ac 16.67Ac Fire Station 4 Minutes Zoning I-2 I-2 I-2 Police Station 10 Minutes ESA Phase 1 No RECs No RECs No RECs Hospital 10 Minutes ESA Phase 2 No No No Living Cost Index 96.6 Required Average Commute 22.4 Minutes *Preliminary Geotechnical Complete Complete Complete Sales Tax 8.95% Exploration 2018 Property Tax Rate 7.0378 Seismic Site Class D D D ISO Rating (1 is perfect) 2 out of 10 *Cultural Resource Sites Previously None None None Mapped Demographics - City of St. Charles (2017) *Wetland Water- • Population - 70,329 body Illustrated on Yes Yes Yes Site • Median Age - 38.3 *Threatened & • Median Household Income - $57,882 Endangered Species Yes Yes Yes FOUNTAIN LAKES Potentially Present • School District - Orchard Farm (100 on APR) Avg. Slope 1% 1% 1% COMMERCE CENTER FEMA Flood Zone ZonesAE; X Zones AE; X ZonesAE; X Access Information Site 1 (Lots H-J, L-N, O) Surface Soil Types CH,CL, CH, CL, CH, CL, Street Classification Minor Arterial GrowStCharles.com ML,SW ML,SW ML,SW Interstate 370 (4 lane) 3 Minutes Full reports available upon request. Interstate 70 (4 lane) 11 Minutes *Based on desktop review of available databases and resource maps . Further consultation and/or surveys may be necessary. Interstate 270 (4 lane) 13 Minutes Lambert Intl.
    [Show full text]
  • I-495 and I-270 Express Lanes Stated Preference Survey
    Maryland Department of Transportation I-495 AND I-270 EXPRESS LANES STATED PREFERENCE SURVEY Final Report │ August 9, 2019 PREPARED FOR: MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUBMITTED BY: 55 Railroad Row RSG White River Junction, VT 05001 802.295.4999 IN COOPERATION WITH: www.rsginc.com CDM SMITH Maryland Department of Transportation I-495 AND I-270 EXPRESS LANES STATED PREFERENCE SURVEY CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................ 1 2.0 QUESTIONNAIRE .............................................................................. 3 2.1 INTRODUCTION AND TRIP QUALIFICATION QUESTIONS ..................3 2.2 TRIP CHARACTERISTIC QUESTIONS ..................................................6 2.3 STATED PREFERENCE QUESTIONS ................................................. 11 2.4 DEBRIEF AND OPINION QUESTIONS ................................................. 14 2.5 EXPRESS LANES USE QUESTIONS ................................................... 16 2.6 DEMOGRAPHIC QUESTIONS .............................................................. 17 3.0 SURVEY ADMINISTRATION ........................................................... 18 3.1 EMAIL INVITATION TO MARYLAND AND VIRGINIA E-ZPASS CUSTOMERS ....................................................................................... 20 3.2 EMAIL INVITATION TO ONLINE RESEARCH PANEL ......................... 20 4.0 SURVEY ANALYSIS ........................................................................ 21 4.1 IDENTIFICATION OF OUTLIERS .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 21-183 Maryland Historical Trust State Historic Sites Inventory Form
    M: 21-183 Survey No ftlegLLsl3.3 Magi No. DOE yes no MARYLAND INVENTORY OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES Maryland Historical Trust State Historic Sites Inventory Form 1. Name (indicate preferred name) historic Mount Pleasant / The Magruder/Clements/Offutt/Casey Farm and/or common Eugene B. Casey Community Center/ Casey Barns 2. Location street & number 810 South Frederick Avenue Not for publication city, town Gaithersburg vicinity of congressional district state Maryland county Montgomery 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district X public X occupied agriculture museum X buildinq(s) private unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process X yes: restricted X_government scientific being considered yes: unrestricted industrial transportation X_not applicable no military other: 4. Owner of Property (give names and mailing addresses of all owners.) name Mayor and Council of Gaithersburg, Maryland street & number 31 South Summit Avenue telephone no.: 301- 258-6300 city, town Gaithersburg state and zip code MD 20877 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Montgomery County Courthouse liber 4315 street & number Judicial Center 50 Courthouse Square folio 349 city, town state Rockville, Maryland 6. Representation In Existing Historical Surveys title City of Gaithersburg Historic Resources Inventory date federal state county X local depository for survey records City Hall. 31 South Summit Avenue city, town Gaithersburg state Maryland 7. Description survey NO. M:21-183 Condition Check one Check one x excellent deteriorated unaltered X_ original site good ruins _X altered moved date of move fair unexposed Prepare both a summary paragraph and a general description of the resource and its various elements as it exists today.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning, Housing, and Economic Development (PHED) Committee
    PHED Committee #2 March 1, 2021 M E M O R A N D U M February 24, 2021 TO: Planning, Housing, and Economic Development (PHED) Committee FROM: Pamela Dunn, Senior Legislative Analyst SUBJECT: Shady Grove Sector Plan Minor Master Plan Amendment PURPOSE: Worksession to develop recommendations for Council consideration Expected Participants: Casey Anderson, Chair, Montgomery County Planning Board Gwen Wright, Director, Montgomery Planning Department Carrie Sanders, Mid-County Chief, Montgomery Planning Department Jessica McVary, Master Plan Supervisor, Montgomery Planning Department Nkosi Yearwood, Planner Coordinator, Montgomery Planning Department Steve Findley, Planner Coordinator, Montgomery Planning Department Luis Estrada Cepero, Urban Designer, Montgomery Planning Dominic Quattrocchi, Park Planning, Parks Department Rebecca Ballo, Supervisor, Historic Preservation, Montgomery Planning Department This is the Planning, Housing, and Economic Development (PHED) Committee’s first worksession on the Shady Grove Sector Plan Minor Master Plan Amendment. A separate memorandum from Glenn Orlin will address the transportation issues in the Plan. This memorandum will address all other Master Plan issues. Testimony relevant to this report is attached on ©1-12. Councilmembers may wish to bring their copy of the Plan to the meeting. BACKGROUND The Shady Grove Sector Plan Minor Master Plan Amendment encompasses a plan area defined by several major transportation facilities, including Frederick Road (MD 355), the Intercounty Connector (MD 200), Shady Grove Road, Redland Road, Midcounty Highway, the Metrorail station and tracks, the CSX rail tracks, and the future Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) corridor along MD 355.1 The Plan area is home to a variety of residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional uses. Established residential neighborhoods are primarily in the northern and southeastern portions of the Plan area.
    [Show full text]