Bibliography

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bibliography Bibliography Acharya, Bijay Kisor. Codification in British India. Calcutta: S.K. Banerji and Sons, 1914. Adhikari, G, ed. Documents of the History of the Communist Party of India, I, 1917–22. New Delhi: People’s Publishing House, 1971. Agnes, Flavia. Law and Gender Inequality: The Politics of Women’s Rights in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1999. ———. ‘The Supreme Court, the Media, and the Uniform Civil Code Debate’. In The Crisis of Secularism in India, edited by Anuradha Dingwaney Needham and Rajeswari Sunder Rajan, 294–315. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007. Ahir, D. C. Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Writings and Speeches (A Ready Reference Manual of 17 Volumes). Delhi: B. R. Publishing Corporation, 2007. Ahmad, Aziz. Islamic Modernism in India and Pakistan. London: Oxford University Press, 1967. ———. Studies in Islamic Culture in the Indian Environment. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964. Ahmed, Rafiuddin.The Bengal Muslims, 1871–1906: A Quest for Identity. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1996. Alam, Muzaffar.The Crisis of Empire in Mughal North: Awadh and Punjab, 1707–1748. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1986. Alam, Muzaffar and Sanjay Subrahmanyam, eds. Introduction toThe Mughal State 1526–1750, 1–72. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1998. Alavi, Hamza and J. Harriss. ‘Politics of Ethnicity in India and Pakistan’. In Sociology of ‘Developing Societies’, edited by Hamza Alavi and J. Harriss, 222–46. Hampshire: Macmillan, 1989. Alavi, Seema, ed. Introduction to The Eighteenth Century in India, 1–56. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2002. ———. ‘The Makings of Company Power: James Skinner in the Ceded and Conquered Provinces, 1802–1840’. The Indian Economic and Social History Review30 (4) (1993): 437–66. ———. The Sepoys and the Company: Tradition and Transition in Northern India, 1770–1830. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, [1995] 1998. Ali, M. Athar. ‘The Eighteenth Century: An Interpretation’. Indian Historical Review 5 (1–2) (1978–79): 175–86. ———. ‘The Mughal Polity: A Critique of Revisionist Approaches’.Modern Asian Studies 27(4) (1993): 699–710. ———. ‘The Passing of Empire: The Mughal Case’. Modern Asian Studies 9 (13) (1975): 385–96. ———. ‘Recent Theories of Eighteenth Century India’. Indian Historical Review 13 (1–2) (1986–87): 102–08. Alter, Joseph S. Gandhi’s Body: Sex, Diet, and the Politics of Nationhood. Pennsylvania, PA: The University of Pennsylvania Press, 2000. 2 A HISTORY OF MODERN INDIA Alter, Joseph T. ‘Celibacy, Sexuality and the Transformation of Gender into Nationalism in North India’. The Journal of Asian Studies 53 (1) (1994): 45–66. ———. ‘Gandhi’s Body, Gandhi’s Truth: Non-Violence and the Biomoral Imperative of Public Health’. The Journal of Asian Studies 55 (2) (1996): 301–22. Ambedkar, B. R. ‘Castes in India, Their Mechanism, Genesis and Development’. Indian Antiquary XLI (May, 1917). Babasaheb Ambedkar Writings and Speeches (BAWS), edited by Vasant Moon. Vol. 1: 3–22. Bombay: Education Department, Government of Maharashtra, 1990. Available at: http://drambedkarbooks.files. wordpress.com/2009/03/selected-work-of-dr-b-r-ambedkar.pdf. ———. In Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Writings and Speeches (BAWS), edited by Vasant Moon. 14 (1). Mumbai: Government of Maharashtra, Education Department, 1995. ———. ‘Evidence before the Southborough Committee on Franchise’. In Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches (BAWS), edited by Vasant Moon. Vol. 1: 245–77. Bombay: Education Department, Government of Maharashtra, [1919] 1979. ———. ‘Evidence of Dr. Ambedkar before the Indian Statutory Commission’. In Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches (BAWS), edited by Vasant Moon. Vol. 2: 459–90. Bombay: Education Department, Government of Maharashtra, [1928] 1982. ———. The Evolution of Provincial Finance in British India. London: P. S. King and Son, 1925. ———. Speech at the First Round Table Conference, 1930. ———. ‘Statement on Education of the Depressed Classes in the Bombay Presidency: 29 May 1928’. In B. R. Ambedkar: Perspectives on Social Exclusion and Inclusive Policies, edited by Sukhadeo Thorat and Narender Kumar, 105–08. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2008. ———.What Congress and Gandhi Have Done to the Untouchables. London: Thacker & Co, 1945; Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Writings and Speeches (BAWS), ed. Vasant Moon. Bombay: Government of Maharashtra, reprinted in 1990. Amin, Shahid. Event, Metaphor, Memory: Chauri Chaura 1922–1992. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995. ———. ‘Gandhi as Mahatma: Gorakhpur District, Eastern UP, 1921–2’. In Subaltern Studies III: Writings on South Asian History and Society, edited by R. Guha, 1–61. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1984. ———. Sugarcane and Sugar in Gorakhpur: An Inquiry into Peasant Production for Capitalist Enterprise in Colonial India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1984. ———. ‘They Also Followed Gandhi’. InPostcolonial Passages: Contemporary History-writing on India, edited by Saurabh Dube, 132–58. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2004. Anagol, Padma. The Emergence of Feminism in India, 1850–1920. Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing, 2005. ———. ‘Rebellious Wives and Dysfunctional Marriages: Indian Women’s Discourses and Participation in the Debates over Restitution of Conjugal Rights and the Child Marriage Controversy in the 1880s and 1890s’. In Women and Social Reform in Modern India, edited by Tanika Sarkar and Sumit Sarkar, 1: 282–312. Bloomington, IA: Indiana University Press, 2010. Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. New York: Verso, 1991. Anderson, W. K. and S. D. Damle. The Brotherhood in Saffron: The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and Hindu Revivalism. New Delhi: Vistaar Publications, 1987. Ansari, Sarah. ‘The Movement of Indian Muslims to West Pakistan after 1947: Partition Related Migration and BIBLIOGRAPHY 3 Its Consequences for the Pakistani Province of Sind’. In Migration: The Asian Experience, edited by Judith M. Brown and Rosemary Foots, 149–68. Oxford: St. Martin’s Press, 1994. Appadurai, Arjun. ‘Introduction: Commodities and the Politics of Value’. In The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, edited by Arjun Appadurai, 3–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986. ———. ‘Number in the Colonial Imagination’. In Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament, edited by Carol A. Breckenridge and Peter Van der Veer, 314–40. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1994. Arasaratnam, S. ‘Merchants and Commerce in Coromandel: Trends and Tendencies in the Eighteenth Century’. In On the Eighteenth Century as a Category of Indian History: Van Leur in Retrospect, edited by Leonard Blussé and Femme Gaastra, 261–88. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd, 1998. ———. ‘Trade and Political Dominion in South India, 1750–1790: Changing British–Indian Relationships’. Modern Asian Studies 13 (1) (1979): 19–40. Argov, D. Moderates and Extremists in the Indian Nationalist Movement, 1883–1920. Bombay: Asia Publishing House, 1967. Arnold, David. The Congress in Tamil Nadu, Nationalist Politics in South India 1919–1937. London: Curzon Press, 1977. ———. Gandhi: Profiles in Power. Edinburgh: Pearson Education, 2001. ———. ‘Labour Relations in a South Indian Sugar Factory 1937–39’. Social Scientist 6 (5) (1977): 16–33. ———. Police Power and Colonial Rule in Madras, 1859–1947. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1986. ———. ‘The Politics of Coalescence: The Congress in Tamilnadu’. In Congress and the Raj: Facets of the Indian Struggle, 1917–47, edited by D. A. Low, 259–88. London: Heinemann; New Delhi: Oxford University Press, [1977] 2005. ———. ‘Quit India in Madras: Hiatus of Climacteric’. In The Indian Nation in 1942, edited by G. Pandey, 207– 22.Calcutta: K. P. Bagchi & Co, 1988. ———. ‘Rebellious Hillmen: The Gudem Rampa Rebellions (1829–1914)’. In Subaltern Studies I: Writings on South Asian History and Society, edited by Ranajit Guha, 88–142. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1982. Arnold, Edwin. The Song Celestial or Bhagavad Gita. London: Trübner and Co, 1886. Asad, Talal. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003. Asher, Catherine B. and Cynthia Talbot. India Before Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Ashraf, K. M. ‘Presidential Address to the Medieval History Section’. Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, 143–52.Aligarh, 1960. Austin, Granville. The Indian Constitution: Cornerstone of a Nation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966. ———.Working a Democratic Constitution: The Indian Experience. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1999. Ayer, S. A. Unto Him a Witness. Bombay: Thacker Spink and Co., 1951. Azad, Maulana Abul Kalam. India Wins Freedom. Bombay: Orient Longman, 1959. Bagchi, A. K, ed. Colonialism and Indian Economy. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2010. ———. ‘Deindustrialization in the Nineteenth Century: Some Theoretical Implications’.Journal of Development Studies 12 (2) (1976): 135–64. ———. Private Investment in India, 1900–1939. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972. Bahadur, Lal. Indian Freedom Movement and Thought: Politics of ‘Pro-Change’ versus ‘No-Change’, 1919–1929. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers, 1983. 4 A HISTORY OF MODERN INDIA Baker, Christopher John. The Politics of South India 1920–1937. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976. Baker, Christopher John and D. A. Washbrook. ‘Rhetoric of Democracy and Development in Late Colonial India’. In Nationalism, Democracy and Development: State and Politics in India, edited by Sugata
Recommended publications
  • Course Title Gender and Public Discourse in India
    Maitrayee Chaudhuri Fall 2015 Office: 244 Friday: 8.35 am -11.35 am Phone:514-398-3507 Leacock 210 Office hours: 2:00-4:00 Fridays Email: [email protected] COURSE TITLE GENDER AND PUBLIC DISCOURSE IN INDIA Course Description This course explores how the making of a modern Indian nation state entailed a remaking of gender identities. It will look at how colonialism led to the growth of an ambiguous attitude towards modernity and how tradition and culture became key sites of contention for gender issues. Through the analysis of specific debates in public discourse, in different historical junctures in colonial and independent India, the course will examine the intersections between gender, diversities and inequalities. The course will broadly be divided into four parts. Part 1 and 2 will look at some critical events during the colonial period, while Part 3 and 4 will focus on independent India. Central to this course will be attention to contexts, actors and the manner in which gender is played out in India’s public discourse. Part 1 and 2 therefore will look at the dynamics between the colonial state, communities, social reformers, nationalists and women’s organizations. Part 3 will look at the key actors in different phases in independent India: (i) the transformed character of the state and the way other actors get reconfigured in the postcolonial context; (ii) the wide range of social and political movements including a strong and diverse women’s movement (that has since become an important voice in public debates) in the 1970s; (iii) the rise of religious fundamentalism and its attack on gender equality and secularism in the 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. Introduction The Invention of an Ethnic Nationalism he Hindu nationalist movement started to monopolize the front pages of Indian newspapers in the 1990s when the political T party that represented it in the political arena, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP—which translates roughly as Indian People’s Party), rose to power. From 2 seats in the Lok Sabha, the lower house of the Indian parliament, the BJP increased its tally to 88 in 1989, 120 in 1991, 161 in 1996—at which time it became the largest party in that assembly—and to 178 in 1998. At that point it was in a position to form a coalition government, an achievement it repeated after the 1999 mid-term elections. For the first time in Indian history, Hindu nationalism had managed to take over power. The BJP and its allies remained in office for five full years, until 2004. The general public discovered Hindu nationalism in operation over these years. But it had of course already been active in Indian politics and society for decades; in fact, this ism is one of the oldest ideological streams in India. It took concrete shape in the 1920s and even harks back to more nascent shapes in the nineteenth century. As a movement, too, Hindu nationalism is heir to a long tradition. Its main incarnation today, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS—or the National Volunteer Corps), was founded in 1925, soon after the first Indian communist party, and before the first Indian socialist party.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Women in the Quit India Movement Anil Chauhan
    P: ISSN NO.: 2394-0344 RNI No.UPBIL/2016/67980 VOL-4* ISSUE-1* (Part-1) April- 2019 E: ISSN NO.: 2455-0817 Remarking An Analisation Role of Women in The Quit India Movement Abstract The present work is an attempt to evaluate the role of women in the Quit India Movement 1942. Women, from time immemorial, have eagerly taken part in political, social and cultural affairs as and when they were required to do so. They as a force played a very crucial role in the India’s freedom struggle. The Quit India Movement of 1942, which was a spontaneous mass uprising witnessed the women at its fore front. During this movement, the women activists challenged the norms that obsessed an earlier generation of women leaders to fulfil their roles as the freedom fighters. Women during this movement boldly led processions, picketed liquor shops and fearlessly faced the British Raj’s repressions without fearing about their personal well-being.Thus,the brave Women of India created history by making their contribution in the efforts leading to the freedom of their mother land. Keywords: Evaluate Women, Quit India, Movement, Crucial, Freedom Struggle, Spontaneous, Mass Uprising Introduction Mahatma Gandhi once said "When the history of India's fight for independence comes to be written, the sacrifice made by the women of India will occupy the foremost place.". More than 77 years have passed since Quit India Movement was launched by Mahatma Gandhi on the 8th of August in 1942 at the All-India Congress Committee session in Bombay. On the very next day, Gandhiji, Jawaharlal Nehru and many other leaders of the Indian National Congress Anil Chauhan were arrested by the British Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Courses Taught at Both the Undergraduate and the Postgraduate Levels
    Jadavpur University Faculty of Arts Department of History SYLLABUS Preface The Department of History, Jadavpur University, was born in August 1956 because of the Special Importance Attached to History by the National Council of Education. The necessity for reconstructing the history of humankind with special reference to India‘s glorious past was highlighted by the National Council in keeping with the traditions of this organization. The subsequent history of the Department shows that this centre of historical studies has played an important role in many areas of historical knowledge and fundamental research. As one of the best centres of historical studies in the country, the Department updates and revises its syllabi at regular intervals. It was revised last in 2008 and is again being revised in 2011.The syllabi that feature in this booklet have been updated recently in keeping with the guidelines mentioned in the booklet circulated by the UGC on ‗Model Curriculum‘. The course contents of a number of papers at both the Undergraduate and Postgraduate levels have been restructured to incorporate recent developments - political and economic - of many regions or countries as well as the trends in recent historiography. To cite just a single instance, as part of this endeavour, the Department now offers new special papers like ‗Social History of Modern India‘ and ‗History of Science and Technology‘ at the Postgraduate level. The Department is the first in Eastern India and among the few in the country, to introduce a full-scale specialization on the ‗Social History of Science and Technology‘. The Department recently qualified for SAP.
    [Show full text]
  • Note on Misleading and Factual Misrepresentation of the Current NCERT Textbooks: a Response to the Public Notice Issued by the Rajya Sabha Secretariat
    INDIAN HISTORY CONGRESS (Established, 1935) Note on Misleading and Factual Misrepresentation of the Current NCERT Textbooks: A Response to the Public Notice Issued by the Rajya Sabha Secretariat In a recent communication the Rajya Sabha Secretariat has called for ‘Reforms in the contents and designs of Text Books with focus on: a. removing references to un-historical facts and distortions about our national heroes from the text books b. ensuring equal or proportionate references to all periods of Indian history c. highlighting the role of great historic women heroes, including Gargi, Maitreyi, or rulers like Rani of Jhansi, Rani Channamma, Chand Bibi, Zhalkari Bai etc. While History itself is a discipline having its own internal dynamic and gets enriched by continuous research and rigorous debate and discussions within the scholarly domain, the Indian History Congress has examined the claims in the aforementioned notice in the light of the contents of the existing NCERT textbooks. A completely factual examination of the textbooks, with details presented in tabular form below, based on the points mentioned above, however, suggests that the call for the reform of textbooks is not based on any academic, pedagogic or factual detail. The table below presents the references to primary sources, proportionate representations to all periods of history, national heroes, and historical female figures in the NCERT textbooks of Classes VI to XII currently in use in the country. Textbook Primary Source References* References to Proportionate National Heroes** Great Historic Representation (Period/ Women Figures Region/ Language/ Traditions) Class VI Pp. 4-6, 13, 18, 19, 26, 27, 29, P.
    [Show full text]
  • HI234: Introduction to India and South Asia
    Professor Benjamin R. Siegel Lecture, Fall 2016: History Department, Boston University Tu / Th, 12:30 – 2:00, KCB 104 Email: [email protected] Office Hours: Tu / Th 10:30 – noon Office phone: 617-353-8316 226 Bay State Road, Room 205 HI234: Introduction to India and South Asia Map of British India, c. 1909 Map of South Asia, c. 1950 Course Description It is easy to think of the Indian subcontinent, home of nearly 1.7 billion people, as a region only now moving into the global limelight, propelled by remarkable growth against a backdrop of enduring poverty, and dramatic contestations over civil society. Yet since antiquity, South Asia has been one of the world’s most dynamic crossroads, a place where cultures met and exchanged ideas, goods, and populations. The region was the site of the most prolonged and intensive colonial encounter in the form of Britain’s Indian empire, and Indian individuals and ideas entered into long conversations with counterparts in Europe, the Middle East, East and Southeast Asia, and elsewhere. Since India’s independence and partition into two countries in 1947, the region has struggled to overcome poverty, disease, ethnic strife and political conflict. Its three major countries – India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh – have undertaken three distinct experiments in democracy with three radically divergent outcomes. Those countries’ large, important diaspora populations and others have played important roles in these nation’s development, even as the larger world grows more aware of how important South Asia remains, and will become. Benjamin Siegel – HI234: Introduction to India and South Asia This course is a survey of South Asian history from antiquity to the present, focusing on the ideas, encounters, and exchanges that have formed this dynamic region.
    [Show full text]
  • Jagjivan Ram-Pub-4A
    ADDRESSES* AT THE UNVEILING OF THE STATUE OF SHRI JAGJIVAN RAM On 25 August 1995, a statue of the former Deputy Prime Minister of India and eminent parliamentarian, Babu Jagjivan Ram was unveiled at the Entrance Hall of the Lok Sabha Lobby in Parliament House by the President of India, Dr. Shanker Dayal Sharma. The statue has been sculpted by the renowned artist, Shri Ram Sutar. The ceremony was followed by a meeting in the Central Hall which was attended by a distinguished gathering. President, Dr. Shanker Dayal Sharma, the Vice-President and Chairman, Rajya Sabha, Shri K.R. Narayanan, the Prime Minister, Shri P.V. Narasimha Rao, the Speaker, Lok Sabha, Shri Shivraj V. Patil and the daughter of Shri Jagjivan Ram, Smt. Meira Kumar addressed the gathering on the occasion. The texts of the Addresses delivered on the occasion are reproduced below. ADDRESS BY THE PRESIDENT OF INDIA, DR. SHANKER DAYAL SHARMA** Shri K.R. Narayanan, Honourable Vice-President of India, Shri P.V. Narasimha Rao, Prime Minister of India, Shri Shivraj V. Patil, Honourable Speaker, Respected Smt. Indrani Ramji, Honourable Members of the Union Council of Ministers, Leaders of the Opposition, Honourable Members of Parliament, Respected Freedom Fighters, Distinguished Ladies and Gentlemen: We have gathered here today to pay our respects to Babu Jagjivan Ram, a champion of human rights and dignity and one of the great social reformers of our time. As a representative of the masses, a member of our Constituent Assembly and of successive Parliaments and Governments, Jagjivan Ramji had a profound influence in shaping contemporary India.
    [Show full text]
  • Rani of Jhansi
    The RANI OF JHANSI A Historical Play in four acts by PHILIP COX This is a reconstruction in dramatic form of the intensely moving story of the tragic young Hindu Princess, who was fated to take up arms against the British during the Indian Mutiny of 1857. There are 2 female and 12 male speaking parts, besides a crowd. The play is in eleven episodes and requires five sets of scenery. /--- - "" or not this arresting figure of a royal widow in revolt "'to Joan of Arc, her claim upon our notice is indis­ f?'·•e of the tribute paid to her by her chief military ·'" \. British side: "She was the best and bravest of ! /portrait has already secured some striking com· : George Bernard Shaw, who generously perused ~ the original :\IS., has said: "The Rani of Jhansi ..... .~ performed at an Indian Kational Theatre, as soon "' t'!iey :tave one." l\lr. William Armstrong of the Liverpool : e ~·<:rtory Theatre has stated: "You have written a most interest­ ,; ,. ;•l.,y and I enjoytd reading it very much. Sincere, dramatic, 1 • ,I cunstructtd and moYing." :\Ir. Ronald Ad.;~ms of the '1-ssy TLeatre, London, made this comment after reading the script: "This is a magnificent effurt." I :\DO~: GEORGE ALLEN (j UNWIN LTD The author has brought to this very fasci­ nating study of events and motives in a bygone age, the knowledge of a specialist supported by a varied general experience as advocate, administrator and educationist. During recent years his courses of lectures on India, delivered at Morley College, the Evening Institutes of the London County Cow1cil, Toynbee Hall and elsewhere, at-· tracted considerable attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections of Bengali Subaltern Society and Cultural Identity Through the Bangali Bhadrolok’S Lenses: an Analysis
    Parishodh Journal ISSN NO:2347-6648 Reflections Of Bengali Subaltern Society And Cultural IdentIty through the BangalI Bhadrolok’s lenses: an Analysis -Mithun Majumder Phd Research scholar, Deptt of International Relations, Jadavpur University Abstract The Bengalis are identified as culture savvy race, at the national and international levels. But if one dwells deep into Bengali culture, one may identify an admixture of elite/ higher class culture with typical lower/subaltern class culture. Often, it has been witnessed that elite/upper class culture has influenced subaltern class culture. This essay attempts to analyze such issues like: How is the position of the subaltern class reflected in typical elite class mindset? How do they define the subaltern class? Is Bengali culture dominated by the elite class only or the subaltern class gets priority as the chief producer class? This essay strives to answer many such questions Key Words: Bhadralok, Subalterns, Culture, Class, Race, JanaJati By Bengali society and cultural identity, one does mean the construction of a typical Bhadralok cultural identity and Kolkata is identified as the epicentre of Bengali Bhadralok culture. But the educated middle class city residents, salaried people, intellectuals also represent this culture. Bengali art and literature and the ideas generated from the civil society in Kolkata and its cultural exchanges with typical Mofussil or rural subaltern culture can lead to the construction of new language or dialect and may even lead to deconstruction of the same. The unorganized rural women labourers(mostly working as domestic help) often use the phrase that “ we work in Baboo homes in Kolkata”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mortal God: Imagining the Sovereign in Colonial India'
    H-Asia Imy on Banerjee, 'The Mortal God: Imagining the Sovereign in Colonial India' Review published on Saturday, October 26, 2019 Milinda Banerjee. The Mortal God: Imagining the Sovereign in Colonial India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. xviii + 435 pp. $120.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-1-107-16656-1. Reviewed by Kate Imy (University of North Texas)Published on H-Asia (October, 2019) Commissioned by Sumit Guha (The University of Texas at Austin) Printable Version: http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=53810 Milinda Banerjee’s ambitious new study, The Mortal God: Imagining the Sovereign in Colonial India, analyzes the shifting meanings of kingship, rulership, and sovereignty in late colonial Bengal. The primary goal of the work is to “focus on varying ways in which multiple political actors in colonial India ascribed divine and kingly status to specific political forms and beings” (p. 5). He finds hints of this type of political formulation in political reforms as varied as human rights, education, territorial autonomy, and employment, which he argues reflects the “democratization of divinity” (p. 6). This proves to be a fruitful yet challenging, intellectual undertaking, bridging concerns of nationalist, princely, peasant, colonial, and postcolonial forms of political imagination. It opens up many new areas of inquiry for political theory, the history of religions, and the shared histories of colonialism and anti-colonialism. After an interesting discussion of the title’s debt to the seventeenth-century political theories of Thomas Hobbes, Banerjee situates his analysis firmly within the context of colonial Bengal while gesturing to broader dynamics across India.
    [Show full text]
  • The Black Hole of Empire
    Th e Black Hole of Empire Th e Black Hole of Empire History of a Global Practice of Power Partha Chatterjee Princeton University Press Princeton and Oxford Copyright © 2012 by Princeton University Press Requests for permission to reproduce material from this work should be sent to Permissions, Princeton University Press Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 6 Oxford Street, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1TW press.princeton.edu All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Chatterjee, Partha, 1947- Th e black hole of empire : history of a global practice of power / Partha Chatterjee. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-691-15200-4 (hardcover : alk. paper)— ISBN 978-0-691-15201-1 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Bengal (India)—Colonization—History—18th century. 2. Black Hole Incident, Calcutta, India, 1756. 3. East India Company—History—18th century. 4. Imperialism—History. 5. Europe—Colonies—History. I. Title. DS465.C53 2011 954'.14029—dc23 2011028355 British Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available Th is book has been composed in Adobe Caslon Pro Printed on acid-free paper. ∞ Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 To the amazing surgeons and physicians who have kept me alive and working This page intentionally left blank Contents List of Illustrations ix Preface xi Chapter One Outrage in Calcutta 1 Th e Travels of a Monument—Old Fort William—A New Nawab—Th e Fall
    [Show full text]
  • Partition and Independence of India: 1924 Chair: Usama Bin Shafqat Committee Chair: Person ‘Year Director
    Partition and Independence of India: 1924 Chair: Usama Bin Shafqat Committee Chair: Person ‘year Director: Partition and Independence of India: 1924 PMUNC 2015 Contents Chair’s Letter………………………………………………………...…..3 Short History……………………………………………………………..5 The Brief – 1924…………………………………………………………7 Sources to Consider……………………………………………………...8 Roles……………………………………………………………………..9 Maps……………………………………………………………………12 2 Partition and Independence of India: 1924 PMUNC 2015 Chair’s Letter Dear Delegates, Welcome to one of the most uniquely exciting committees at PMUNC 2015! My name is Usama Bin Shafqat and I will be your chair as we engage in a throwback to the events that continue to define lives for more than a billion people today. I am from Islamabad, Pakistan and will be a sophomore this year—tentatively majoring in Operations Research and Financial Engineering. Model UN has always been my IR indulgence in an otherwise scientific education as I culminated my high school career by serving as the Secretary-General for the largest conference in Islamabad—the Millennial Model UN 2013. I’ve continued Model UN here at Princeton by helping out with both PMUNC and PICSIM last year—in Operations and Crisis, respectively. Outside of Model UN, I’m a major foodie and love cricket. This will be a historical crisis committee where we chart our own path through a subcontinent where the British are fast losing grip over their largest colony. We shall convene in the 1920s as political parties within India begin engaging with the masses and stand up more forcefully against the British Empire. Our emphasis will be on the interplay between the major parties in the discussions—the British, the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League.
    [Show full text]