DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report Norske Skog Key FINANCIAL FIGURES

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

08 ANNUAL REPORT NORSKE SKOG KEY FINANCIAL FIGURES DEFINITIONS 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 Income statement (NOK million) Operating revenue 26 468 27 118 28 812 25 726 25 302 24 068 23 471 30 354 26 635 18 054 Gross operating earnings 1 2 723 3 932 4 704 3 957 4 353 4 686 5 198 8 419 6 599 3 818 Operating earnings -1 407 677 -2 527 630 757 1 536 1 306 5 096 4 211 2 129 Earnings before financial expenses 2 -1 242 785 -2 275 -51 868 1 383 1 833 5 581 4 575 2 252 Profit/loss before income taxes -2 779 235 -3 480 -1 004 210 770 806 3 894 3 021 1 825 Net profit/loss for the year -2 765 -683 -3 017 -848 629 406 1 168 2 660 2 184 1 326 Balance sheet (NOK million) Non-current assets 26 980 29 307 37 577 43 740 36 861 39 219 38 197 45 417 43 717 18 828 Current assets 18 211 13 953 7 653 8 293 7 238 7 119 6 769 10 855 17 510 6 086 Total assets 45 191 43 260 45 230 52 033 44 099 46 338 44 966 56 272 61 227 24 914 Total equity 13 632 15 957 18 550 22 679 18 894 19 416 17 921 19 526 22 351 11 727 Non-current liabilities 23 277 21 533 18 802 21 700 20 052 21 402 18 814 30 858 31 906 9 021 Current liabilities 8 282 5 770 7 878 7 654 5 153 5 520 6 210 5 888 6 970 4 166 Total equity and liabilities 45 191 43 260 45 230 52 033 44 099 46 338 42 945 56 272 61 227 24 914 Net interest bearing debt 14 047 16 408 17 320 19 063 16 871 17 759 18 204 22 820 20 535 7 618 Profitability Gross operating margin % 3 10.3 14.5 16.3 15.4 17.2 19.5 22.1 27.7 24.8 21.1 Net operating margin % 4 (5.30) 2.50 (8.80) 2.40 3.00 6.30 5.60 16.80 15.80 11.80 Net profit margin % 5 (10.30) (2.30) (9.70) (3.30) 2.60 1.70 5.00 8.20 7.40 7.20 Return on assets % 6 (2.80) 1.80 (4.70) (0.10) 1.90 3.00 3.60 9.50 10.60 9.20 Return on equity % 7 (18.70) (4.00) (14.60) (4.10) 3.3 2.2 6.3 12.7 12.8 12.2 Equity ratio 8 30.20 36.90 41.50 43.60 42.80 41.90 39.90 34.70 36.50 47.10 Net interest bearing debt/equity 1.03 1.03 0.93 0.84 0.89 0.91 1.02 1.17 0.92 0.65 Net earnings per share (NOK) 9 (14.33) (3.26) (14.84) (5.98) 4.95 3.04 8.79 20.68 19.17 14.01 Net earnings per share fully diluted (NOK) 9 (14.33) (3.26) (14.84) (5.98) 4.95 3.04 8.79 20.68 19.17 14.01 Cash flow per share (NOK) 10 10.43 11.43 14.60 21.42 22.04 22.45 27.89 58.47 48.18 23.29 Cash flow per share fully diluted (NOK) 10 10.43 11.43 14.60 21.42 22.04 22.45 27.89 23.29 48.18 23.29 Liquidity Liquid assets (NOK) 11 6 196 1 886 485 902 889 930 868 4 158 8 629 803 Cash flow (NOK) 12 1 977 2 166 2 763 3 061 2 948 2 973 3 687 7 052 4 922 2 162 Current ratio 13 2.2 2.42 0.97 1.08 1.4 1.29 1.09 1.84 2.51 1.46 Definitions key financial figures: 1. Gross operating earnings = Operating earnings + Ordinary depreciation + Restructuring expenses 2. Earnings before financial expenses = Operating earnings + Interest income + Share of profit in affiliated companies 3. Gross operating margin = Gross operating earnings : Operating revenue 4. Net operating margin = Operating earnings : Operating revenue 5. Net profit margin = Net profit/loss for the year : Operating revenue 6. Return on assets = Earnings before financial expenses : Total assets (average) 7. Return on equity = Net profit/loss for the year : Equity (average) 8. Equity ratio = Equity : Total assets 9. Net earnings per share = Net profit/loss for the year : Average number of shares 10. Cash flow per share after tax = Cash flow : Average number of shares 11. Liquid assets = Cash and bank deposits + Short term investments 12. Cash flow = Net cash flow from operating activities (from statement of cash flow) 13. Current ratio = Current assets : Current liabilities 2 // Norske Skog // Annual Report 2008 // INTRODUCTION THE WORLD OF NORSKE SKOG 1 3 2 7 6 4 5 9 8 10 14 15 12 11 13 PRODUCTION capaciTY PER BUSINESS UNIT Newsprint SC LWC MFC Directory (including improved NP) (magazine) (magazine) (magazine) paper Sum 1 Norske Skog Skogn, Norway 600 000 600 000 2 Norske Skog Saugbrugs, Norway 550 000 550 000 3 Norske Skog Follum, Norway 150 000 140 000 290 000 4 Norske Skog Golbey, France 640 000 640 000 5 Norske Skog Bruck, Austria 128 000 275 000 403 000 6 Norske Skog Walsum, Germany 435 000 435 000 7 Norske Skog Parenco, The Netherlands 470 000 470 000 Total Europe 1 988 000 550 000 710 000 140 000 0 3 388 000 8 SNP Shanghai, China 145 000 145 000 9 Norske Skog Hebei, China 330 000 330 000 10 Norske Skog Singburi, Thailand 130 000 130 000 Total Asia 605 000 0 0 0 0 605 000 11 Norske Skog Tasman, New Zealand 320 000 320 000 12 Norske Skog Albury, Australia 265 000 265 000 13 Norske Skog Boyer, Australia 300 000 300 000 Total Australasia 885 000 0 0 0 0 885 000 14 Norske Skog Pisa, Brazil 185 000 185 000 15 Norske Skog BioBio, Chile 60 000 65 000 125 000 Total South America 245 000 0 0 0 65 000 310 000 Total 3 723 000 550 000 710 000 140 000 65 000 5 188 000 INTRODUCTION // Norske Skog // Annual Report 2008 // 3 INTRODUCTION contents Introduction Key financial figures 2 2 Production capacity per business unit 3 Events 2008 5 Tough measures - CEO´s comment 6 Market and costs World consumption of publication paper 8 8 The price development on input factors 10 Norske Skog´s products 11 Capital market The economic situation 12 12 Shareholder policy 14 Principal shareholders 16 Key figures related to shares 17 Corporate governance Corporate governance in Norske Skog 18 18 Board members 22 Corporate management 23 Members of corporate bodies 24 Articles of association 25 Report of the board of directors and accounts Report of the board of directors 26 26 Accounts group 36 Accounts Norske Skogindustrier ASA 78 Sustainability report Introduction 94 94 Environmental policy 95 This annual report is printed on Customer cooperation in Australia - Article from News Limited 96 65 g/m2 Norset from Raw materials 98 Norske Skog Follum. Energy 100 The cover is printed on Greenhouse gas emissions 101 250 g/m2 Cyclus Print. Production processes 103 Emissions and discharges 104 Design & Layout: Transport 106 Vestfjorden Grafisk AS Environment-related investments 107 Xynergo 108 Photo: CF-Wesenberg/kolonihaven.no Mill figures 2008 112 (Front page, page 6, 22, 23 and 111) Other photos: Norske Skog Corporate social responsibility Print: Ålgård Offset AS 114 Norske Skog´s corporate social responsibility 114 4 // Norske Skog // Annual Report 2008 // INTRODUCTION events//2008 January May septeMber The CEO and the chair of the board held a The corporate assembly elected a new board Terry Hamilton was appointed to the corpo- telephone conference aimed at the financial for Norske Skog. Kim Wahl was re-elected rate management with responsibility for the market. Two main goals for 2008 were pre- as chair, Øystein Stray Spetalen was elected activities in Asia and Australasia. sented: Lower debt and better profitability. deputy chair, Wenche Holen and Svein Ren- Norske Skog sold the main office property Norske Skog held an extraordinary general nemo were elected as new board members. Oxenøen for NOK 429.5 million. The sale of meeting following demands from Unionen Andreas Enger resigned as chief financial Oxenøen and other properties contributed to AS. Two new candidates for the company’s officer (CFO). reduce the net debt by approximately NOK corporate assembly were proposed. A major- Norske Skog presented a weak first quarter 500 million. ity of the attending shareholders voted to result. Weak price developments for the com- Norske Skog established a co-operation maintain the composition of the corporate pany’s products and strong cost increases for with German company CHOREN in the assembly at the time. input factors affected the result negatively. field of second-generation bio-diesel. February June october Norske Skog introduced a number of meas- Norske Skog entered into an agreement to In an interview with Bloomberg, Norske ures to improve profitability. Fundamental sell the wholly owned subsidiary Norske Skog stated that it expected price increases changes to the management structure were Skog Korea to Morgan Stanley Private for newsprint in Europe in 2009 to cover approved, as well as the removal of head Equity Asia and Shinhan Private Equity.
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report Norske Skog

    Annual Report Norske Skog

    09 ANNUAL REPORT NORSKE SKOG BOD report Sustainability 22 and accounts 96 report KEY FINANCIAL FIGURES DEFINITIONS 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Income statement (NOK million) Operating revenue 20 362 26 468 27 118 28 812 25 726 25 302 24 068 23 471 30 354 26 635 Gross operating earnings 1 2 185 2 723 3 932 4 704 3 957 4 353 4 686 5 198 8 419 6 599 Operating earnings (1 325) (1 407) 677 (2 527) 630 757 1 536 1 306 5 096 4 211 Earnings before financial expenses 2 (1 209) (1 242) 785 (2 275) (51) 868 1 383 1 833 5 581 4 575 Profit/loss before income taxes (1 019) (2 779) 235 (3 480) (1 004) 210 770 806 3 894 3 021 Net profit/loss for the year (1 400) (2 765) (683) (3 017) (848) 629 406 1 168 2 660 2 184 Balance sheet (NOK million) Non-current assets 23 546 26 980 29 307 37 577 43 740 36 861 39 219 38 197 45 417 43 717 Current assets 9 609 18 211 13 953 7 653 8 293 7 238 7 119 6 769 10 855 17 510 Total assets 33 155 45 191 43 260 45 230 52 033 44 099 46 338 44 966 56 272 61 227 Total equity 12 015 13 632 15 957 18 550 22 679 18 894 19 416 17 921 19 526 22 351 Non-current liabilities 17 316 23 277 21 533 18 802 21 700 20 052 21 402 18 814 30 858 31 906 Current liabilities 3 824 8 282 5 770 7 878 7 654 5 153 5 520 6 210 5 888 6 970 Total equity and liabilities 33 155 45 191 43 260 45 230 52 033 44 099 46 338 42 945 56 272 61 227 Net interest-bearing debt 9 595 14 047 16 408 17 320 19 063 16 871 17 759 18 204 22 820 20 535 Profitability Gross operating margin % 3 10.73 10.30 14.50 16.30 15.40 17.20 19.50 22.10 27.70 24.80
  • CHAPTER 47 PULP of WOOD OR of OTHER FIBROUS CELLULOSIC MATERIAL; WASTE and SCRAP of PAPER OR PAPERBOARD X 47-1 Note L

    CHAPTER 47 PULP of WOOD OR of OTHER FIBROUS CELLULOSIC MATERIAL; WASTE and SCRAP of PAPER OR PAPERBOARD X 47-1 Note L

    )&f1y3X CHAPTER 47 PULP OF WOOD OR OF OTHER FIBROUS CELLULOSIC MATERIAL; WASTE AND SCRAP OF PAPER OR PAPERBOARD X 47-1 Note l. For the purposes of heading 4702, the expression "chemical wood pulp, dissolving grades" means chemical woodpulp having by weight an insoluble fraction of 92 percent or more for soda or sulfate woodpulp or of 88 percent or more for sulfite woodpulp after one hour in a caustic soda solution containing 18 percent sodium hydroxide (NaOH) at 20oC, and for sulfite woodpulp an ash content that does not exceed 0.15 percent by weight. )&f2y3X X 47-2 4701.00.00 00 4 Mechanical woodpulp................................ t....... Free Free 4702.00.00 Chemical woodpulp, dissolving grades............... ........ Free Free 20 9 Sulfite....................................... t 40 5 Sulfate or soda............................... t 4703 Chemical woodpulp, soda or sulfate, other than dissolving grades: Unbleached: 4703.11.00 00 9 Coniferous............................... t....... Free Free 4703.19.00 00 1 Nonconiferous............................ t....... Free Free Semibleached or bleached: 4703.21.00 Coniferous............................... ........ Free Free 20 3 Semibleached........................ t 40 9 Bleached............................ t 4703.29.00 Nonconiferous............................ ........ Free Free 20 5 Semibleached........................ t 40 1 Bleached............................ t 4704 Chemical woodpulp, sulfite, other than dissolving grades: Unbleached: 4704.11.00 00 8 Coniferous............................... t....... Free Free 4704.19.00 00 0 Nonconiferous............................ t....... Free Free Semibleached or bleached: 4704.21.00 00 6 Coniferous............................... t....... Free Free 4704.29.00 00 8 Nonconiferous............................ t....... Free Free 4705.00.00 00 0 Semichemical woodpulp.............................. t....... Free Free 4706 Pulps of other fibrous cellulosic material: 4706.10.00 00 7 Cotton linters pulp..........................
  • Catalyst Paper Generates Outstanding Savings and Improves Product Quality with Honeywell’S Advanced Control Solution

    Catalyst Paper Generates Outstanding Savings and Improves Product Quality with Honeywell’S Advanced Control Solution

    Catalyst Paper Generates Outstanding Savings and Improves Product Quality with Honeywell’s Advanced Control Solution “Investing in a state-of-the-art advanced control solution from Honeywell has permitted Catalyst Paper to gain increased control over our operating systems while saving millions of dollars each year in raw materials and energy. And we have been able to accomplish all this without sacrificing the high quality of the various products we produce.” Dwight Anderson, Senior Process Control System Specialist, Catalyst Paper Benefits Catalyst Paper sought to find ways for its thermo-mechanical pulp (TMP) process to reduce dependence on kraft consumption and improve process efficiency at its Canadian Elk Falls facility. In order to maintain the company’s high quality expectations, Catalyst wanted to find new, leading-edge ways to reduce kraft consumption, because of its expense, without sacrificing any of the mill’s end-product standards. To achieve cost savings without sacrificing product quality, The Elk Falls Division is located on the Pacific coast of British Columbia, Catalyst Paper called upon Honeywell to partner with them in Canada, near the city of Campbell River on Vancouver Island developing an advanced control solution to improve their pulp quality. Background Some of the benefits realized by Catalyst Paper after the Catalyst Paper Corp., as it has been known since 2005, was implementation of Profit Controller include: formed from the amalgamation of several predecessor companies and acquisitions—including British Columbia Forest • Improved pulp quality by decreasing pulp freeness variability Products, Fletcher Challenge Canada, Norske Skog and by 41% and pulp mean fiber length variability by 21%, Newstech Recycling—each with its own rich history.
  • Nature's Recyclers Activity Guide

    Nature's Recyclers Activity Guide

    NATURE’S RECYCLERS ACTIVITY GUIDE WA-1425 To Naturalists/Interpreters: CONTENTS Many of us don’t realize that while we are rinsing cans and OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES 3 stomping milk jugs for recycling, other creatures are also busy Trash Hunt 3 recycling Lichens, mushrooms, sow bugs, earthworms and Litter — It’s Everywhere 4 beetles spend their whole lives recycling for nature Nature’s Dead Tree & Rotting Log Study 5 recyclers are responsible for turning dead plants and animals Mushroom Adventure 8 back into usable nutrients for other plants and animals Likewise, Where Do Things Come From? 9 humans are responsible for turning trash back into reusable materials INDOOR ACTIVITIES 12 Recycling For the Birds 12 Parks and outdoor recreation areas are great locations for Recycling Games 14 demonstrating the importance of recycling The natural setting has visual examples of cycles, recyclers and natural resources LONGER PROJECTS 17 You can use these examples to make connections between for Classroom, Home, or natural and human recycling, and between recycling and Residential Camp preservation of natural resources People coming to parks and Make Your Own Paper 17 nature centers to relax and enjoy the outdoors are generally Earthworm Castles 18 receptive to recycling hints and ideas that will help save the Microbe Garden 20 natural resources they love Mini-Composts 21 Natural Dyes 23 This activity guide book will help you teach about natural recycling, cycles in nature, and the important role people play IDEAS FOR EXHIBITS 24 in recycling The activities
  • Q2 2021 Presentation 16 July 2021

    Q2 2021 Presentation 16 July 2021

    Q2 2021 presentation 16 July 2021 Follow us on LinkedIn www.norskeskog.com Sustainable and innovative industry ENTERING Biochemicals 1,000 tonnes of 500 tonnes of 300 tonnes of ▪ Leading publication paper producer with five & materials biochemicals capacity1 CEBINA capacity CEBICO capacity (pilot) industrial sites globally Q1 2023 Q4 2021 ▪ Ongoing transition into higher growth and ENTERING higher value markets Renewable Interliner 760k tonnes of ~200k tonnes of ▪ Becoming a leading independent European packaging containerboard capacity Interliner capacity recycled containerboard company in 2023 Q4 2022 ▪ Packaging market growth and margin EXPANDING outlook strengthened since announcement Waste-to- Green bio- Sustainable energy plant mass energy ▪ High return waste-to-energy project +400 GWh of waste- ~425 GWh of wood ~28 GWh of biogas ~1,000 GWh of biomass energy based energy capacity pellets capacity energy capacity energy capacity2 improving green energy mix in Q2 2022 Q2 2022 ▪ Promising biochemicals and materials projects spearheaded by Circa PRESENT ▪ Industrial sites portfolio provide foundation for Publication 1,400k tonnes of 400k tonnes of 360k tonnes of further industrial development paper Newsprint capacity LWC capacity SC capacity Under construction Date Estimated start-up date 2 1) Norske Skog is the largest shareholder with ~26% ownership position in Circa; 2) Installed capacity for biofuel and waste from recycled paper of 230 MW Second quarter in brief Final investment decision made for Golbey conversion to containerboard
  • Deinking of Screen-Printed Electrodes Printed on Invasive Plant-Based Paper

    Deinking of Screen-Printed Electrodes Printed on Invasive Plant-Based Paper

    sustainability Article Article DeinkingDeinking of of Screen-Printed Screen-Printed Electrodes Printed on InvasiveInvasive Plant-Based Plant-Based Paper UrškaUrška Kav Kavˇciˇc*čič *, Igor, Igor Karlovits Karlovits and and Janja Janja Zule Zule PulpPulp and and Paper Paper Institute, Institute, Bogiši Bogiši´ceva8,ćeva 8, 1000 Ljubljana, Slov Slovenia;enia; igor.karlovits@icp-lj. [email protected] (I.K.); janja.zule@icp- [email protected] (J.Z.) (J.Z.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 21 January 2020; Accepted: 6 February 2020; Published: date Received: 21 January 2020; Accepted: 9 February 2020; Published: 12 February 2020 Abstract: The deinking of paper-based printed electronics is a growing concern regarding the Abstract: The deinking of paper-based printed electronics is a growing concern regarding the increase increase of printed electronics products. The benefits of using paper-based substrates instead of of printed electronics products. The benefits of using paper-based substrates instead of polymer polymer or ceramic for the single-use printed electrodes can contribute to sustainability goals. The or ceramic for the single-use printed electrodes can contribute to sustainability goals. The use of use of invasive plant species for making paper substrates for printed electronics is a unique invasive plant species for making paper substrates for printed electronics is a unique opportunity opportunity to have several environmental benefits. In this study, the recycling issue of these to have several environmental benefits. In this study, the recycling issue of these products through products through the use of the deinking technique was evaluated. Screen-printed electrodes the use of the deinking technique was evaluated.
  • Paper and Board Packaging Recyclability Guidelines

    Paper and Board Packaging Recyclability Guidelines

    FOR THE FU IGN TU ES R D E PAPER AND BOARD PACKAGING RECYCLABILITY GUIDELINES PAPER AND BOARD PACKAGING RECYCLABILITY GUIDELINES Helping retailers and brands specify and design packaging that can be reprocessed in paper mills 2 PAPER AND BOARD PACKAGING RECYCLABILITY GUIDELINES 3 CONTENTS PAPER AND BOARD PACKAGING RECYCLABILITY GUIDELINES Paper is a sustainable, renewable and ecologically sound choice for packaging DE because almost all paper and board is recyclable. In practice, the recyclability of 4 Plastic SIG packaging products will be determined by composition and design, and the way N they are collected and presented for reprocessing. The vast majority of paper- based products are easily recyclable. 8 Coatings FO R Paper recycling in the UK is a success story, with over 80% of paper and board 9 Peelable Solutions T packaging recovered for recycling. Paper for Recycling (PfR) is collected primarily H for use in manufacturing processes and is used as an alternative to virgin materials e.g. wood pulp. When presented it should therefore be of adequate quality and 10 Varnishes and Curable Varnishes E Recyclability of paper-based packaging economically viable to use. F As society evolves, different applications are found for paper and board which 11 Adhesives U sometimes require changes to its functionality. This is often achieved by combining 11 Alternative Barriers T the fibre substrate with another material to form a composite multi-layer laminate, U providing properties such as water resistance or a gas barrier to extend product life. These changes provide challenges for recycling, and in many instances can R 97% 12 Paper Products 3% increase the costs of reprocessing and of waste disposal.
  • Optimisation of the Norske Skog Activated Sludge Wastewater Treatment Plant at Boyer: the Role of Trace Metals and Vitamins

    Optimisation of the Norske Skog Activated Sludge Wastewater Treatment Plant at Boyer: the Role of Trace Metals and Vitamins

    Optimisation of the Norske Skog activated sludge wastewater treatment plant at Boyer: The role of trace metals and vitamins Jason Barnett BEnvSc (Honours) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Chemistry University of Tasmania June 2013 Declaration I declare this thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma in any other tertiary institution, except by way of back ground information and duly referenced in the thesis. To the best of the candidate’s knowledge and belief, no material previously published or written by another person is included in the text of the thesis except where due reference is made in the text of the thesis. This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. 30th June 2013 Jason Barnett Date ii | P a g e Abstract In January 2008 Norske Skog, Boyer (NSB) , Tasmania, commissioned an activated sludge (AS) wastewater treatment plant to lower the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and suspended solids (SS) in the treated effluent discharged from the mill. In October 2009 the company also changed the feed stock of the mill from a mixed Pinus radiata and Eucalypt to solely P. radiata, altering the pulping process. The cold caustic soda (CCS) plant was decommissioned and replaced with an additional thermo-mechanical pulping (TMP) plant. Trace metals in the mill wastewater samples were analysed before and after this transition to detect any differences due to the changed feedstock and operating conditions, and to determine if metal levels were sufficient for optimum operation of the AS wastewater treatment plant.
  • Arbeidsgruppen for Treforedlingsindustrien Kartlegging Av Muligheter Og Rammevilkår for Treforedlingsindustrien

    Arbeidsgruppen for Treforedlingsindustrien Kartlegging Av Muligheter Og Rammevilkår for Treforedlingsindustrien

    Arbeidsgruppen for treforedlingsindustrien Kartlegging av muligheter og rammevilkår for treforedlingsindustrien 10.5.2012 1 Innhold 1. Innledning .......................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Bakgrunn for arbeidsgruppen .................................................................................. 3 1.2. Arbeidsgruppens mandat, sammensetning og arbeid ............................................ 4 2. Hovedtrekk i utviklingen i treforedlingsindustrien ....................................................... 5 2.1. Nærmere om treforedlingsindustrien ...................................................................... 6 2.2. Muligheter ved omstilling til ny produksjon og investeringer i nye produkter 11 3. Råvaresituasjonen og norsk skogpolitikk ..................................................................... 12 3.1. Tilgang, avsetningsvilkår og markedssituasjonen for tømmer og trevirke ....... 13 3.2. Innsatsfaktoren tømmer og effektive transporter er viktig for treforedlingsindustriens kostnadsmessige konkurransekraft ............................ 15 3.3. Regjeringens virkemidler som skal bidra til stabil og konkurransedyktig forsyning av trevirke ................................................................................................ 17 4. Rammevilkår innenfor områdene energi og miljø ....................................................... 18 4.1. Rammevilkår på energiområdet ............................................................................
  • 4.3 Optical Properties

    4.3 Optical Properties

    Summary Mechanical pulping is a process for production of wood pulp in papermaking. Thermomechanical Pulp (TMP) and Groundwood (GW) are historically the two production methods used for mechanical pulping. Because of high electrical prices and increasing requirements in pulp quality it is of interest to improve the mechanical pulping process. The Advanced Thermomechanical Pulp (ATMP) process is a development of the TMP process developed to reduce the electrical energy consumption in production of mechanical pulp. ATMP also has better strength properties and optical properties compared to TMP. Andritz, Paper and Fibre Research Institute (PFI) and Norske Skog together have developed this production method throughout several pilot plant trials with excellent results. Mechanical pre-treatment of wood chips with a screw press and chemical addition in a high intensity primary refining stage are the features of the ATMP process. This process has recently been described (Hill et al. 2009, Hill et al. 2010, Gorski et al. 2011 and Johansson et al. 2011). Improvements in the electrical energy efficiency in refining of up to 0,65 MWh/odt or 34 % as well as higher brightness and lower shive contents compared to reference TMP pulp were shown for spruce raw material (Gorski et al. 2011) To further understand what happens with the pulp in ATMP process compared to the TMP process different investigations were carried out. Methylene blue sorption were evaluated and used to measure the total amount of anionic groups on both ATMP and TMP produced pulps. ATMP produced pulps achieved a higher number of acidic groups compared to pulps without addition of chemicals for not only the whole pulp but also for three different fractions of each pulp.
  • ANNUAL REPORT 1997 1 Main Figures Per Area

    ANNUAL REPORT 1997 1 Main Figures Per Area

    NORSKE SKOG ANNUAL REPORT 1997 1 Main figures per Area 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 Area Paper Operating revenue NOK million 9,284 9,493 8,066 5,831 4,731 4,773 5,855 6,733 5,768 Operating profit NOK million 1,134 2,078 1,708 454 469 95 656 721 398 Operating margin % 12.2 21.9 21.2 7.8 9.9 2.0 11.2 10.7 6.9 Area Fibre Operating revenue NOK million 1,376 1,222 2,171 1,498 1,052 1,202 1,247 1,709 2,025 Operating profit NOK million 49 -127 682 178 -187 -176 -164 327 615 Operating margin % 3.6 -10.4 31.4 11.9 -17.8 -14.6 -13.2 19.1 30.4 Area Building Materials Operating revenue NOK million 2,667 2,579 2,333 2,048 1,704 1,688 1,725 1,960 1,911 Operating profit NOK million -16 27 96 146 85 64 9 107 93 Operating margin % -0.6 1.0 4.1 7.1 5.0 3.8 0.5 5.5 4.9 Operating revenue per market Operating revenue per product Rest of Other world 8% 2% Pulp 8% Norway 23% Newsprint Special grades 1% USA 10% 40% SC magazine paper 20% Other Europe 25% Germany 15% LWC magazine paper 9% UK 11% France 8% Building materials 20% 2 NORSKE SKOG ANNUAL REPORT 1997 1997 Highlights Price decline caused weaker result Growth in sawn timber Expansion in Eastern Europe Prices of paper and pulp fell during the In September, Norske Skog took over In November, Norske Skog took over first quarter of 1997.
  • Sustainability Report 2019 Contents

    Sustainability Report 2019 Contents

    SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2019 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Norske Skog - The big picture 3 Strategic vision and concerns 4 Value chain 5 CEO’s comments 6 THE UN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS 8 SDG 3 – God health and well-being 9 SDG 4 – Quality education 10 SDG 5 – Gender equality 12 SDG 6 – Clean water and sanitation 14 SDG 7 – Affordable and clean energy 15 SDG 8 – Decent work and economic growth 16 SDG 9 – Industry, innovation and infrastructure 18 SDG 10 – Reduced inequalities 19 SDG 11 – Sustainable cities and communities 20 SDG 12 – Responsible consumption and production 21 SDG 13 – Climate action 24 SDG 15 – Life on land 26 SDG 16 – Peace, justice and strong institutions 28 Consistent quality 29 Renewed trust 30 Editor-in-chief: Martine Bortolotti, Norske Skog Golbey Drafting of content: Stepping Stones, Strasbourg / Norske Skog Golbey Graphic design and creation: bk.no Photo credits: Alain Bonis, Grégory Brandel GRDF, Communication Communauté d’agglomération d’Épinal, Léo-Pol Jacquot, Adrien Kurtz, JL CD88, Michel Laurent, Groupe Maury, Benoit Rajaux, Christophe Voegelé, Norske Skog Golbey photo library Paper: Lenza top recycling white Printing: Deklic Graphique Norske Skog Golbey BP 109, Route Jean-Charles Pellerin, 88194 Golbey cedex, France http://norskeskog-golbey.com/ You can help improve this report by sending your comments to this address: [email protected] Follow us: Linkedin / Facebook / Twitter Date of publication: April 2020 NORSKE SKOG ASA PAPER MILLS 6 IN 5 COUNTRIES Skogn, Norway Saugbrugs, Norway Golbey, France Bruck,