DOCSLIB.ORG

Optimal Phasing and Performance Mapping for Translunar Satellite Missions Across the Earth-Moon Nodal Cycle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

OPTIMAL PHASING AND PERFORMANCE MAPPING FOR TRANSLUNAR SATELLITE MISSIONS ACROSS THE EARTH-MOON NODAL CYCLE A Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty By Richard A. J. Hunter In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Daniel Guggenheim School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology May 2020 Copyright c Richard A. J. Hunter 2020 OPTIMAL PHASING AND PERFORMANCE MAPPING FOR TRANSLUNAR SATELLITE MISSIONS ACROSS THE EARTH-MOON NODAL CYCLE Approved by: Dr. Brian C. Gunter Daniel Guggenheim School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Edgar G. Lightsey Daniel Guggenheim School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Koki Ho Daniel Guggenheim School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Date Approved: January 08, 2020 “Exploration is in our nature. We began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still. We have lingered long enough on the shores of the cosmic ocean. We are ready at last to set sail...” Carl Sagan To my mother and father, whose strong work ethic, intelligence, and boundless support has placed within reach a profession that brings challenge and wonder. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I was exceedingly fortunate to receive my graduate education at the Georgia Institute of Technology. My time at the Guggenheim School of Aerospace Engi- neering has been transformative, though I did not make the journey alone. First and foremost, I would like to thank my mother Jane, and father Tim. Their love and support has always been steadfast, despite a son intent on leaving a re- spectable job to cross half a world for the foolhardy pursuits of rocket science. My sister Rachel, and brother James have inspired me endlessly through their stunning achievements in academia, athletics, and professional life. Their dedica- tion and vision heavily influenced the leap of faith into graduate studies. Dr. Brian Gunter has played a pivotal role in my masters degree. He provided the foundation in astrodynamics and orbit determination that would become the focus of my career. More importantly, he has proved an invaluable and enthusiastic mentor throughout this research, helping me navigate a complex problem through significant challenges. I very much look forward to our joint ventures in the future. I would also like to acknowledge Dr. Glenn Lightsey, whose intelligence and good humor were ever present and appreciated in the lab. Together with Dr. Gunter and Dr. Koki Ho, he has made the SSDL an engaging, collaborative environment that will continue to excel as a top space research and academic center. I am very grateful to the Georgia Tech collegiate triathlon team, particularly Peter Griffiths, Vincent Terrier, Kalina Paunovska, Chris Douglas, Elizabeth Spiers, Thomas Easley, Marc Papakyriakou, and David Wolfson for the camaraderie and exercise that kept me sane over the past two years. Finally, a special thank you to Dr. Avinash Rao for the conversational spark that began this research. For your support through the considerable trials we faced, I will forever be immensely grateful. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments . v List of Tables . xi List of Figures . xii Chapter 1: Motivation and Background . 1 1.1 Motivation . 1 1.1.1 Lunar Exploration: A New Focus . 1 1.1.2 Pathfinders: Small Satellite Lunar Applications . 4 1.1.3 The Barrier of Translunar Injection . 6 1.2 Background . 16 1.2.1 The Lunar Orbit . 16 1.2.2 Apollo Architecture . 21 1.2.3 Exploration Mission 1 Architecture . 23 1.2.4 Beresheet/Chandrayaan 2 Architecture . 25 1.2.5 Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory Architecture . 26 1.2.6 Optimal Lunar Pathfinder Architecture . 27 1.2.7 Lunar Arrival Conditions . 29 1.2.8 Knowledge Gap . 30 vi 1.3 Objectives . 31 1.3.1 Research Question 1: Payload Mass Dependency . 32 1.3.2 Research Question 2: Arrival Orbital Element Dependency . 32 1.3.3 Research Question 3: Departure Epoch Dependency . 33 1.3.4 Research Question 4: Launch Vehicle Compatibility . 33 Chapter 2: Technical Approach . 35 2.1 Parameter Space . 35 2.1.1 Fixed Parameters . 35 2.1.2 Variable Parameters . 37 2.1.3 Parameter Space Summary . 38 2.2 The General Mission Analysis Tool: GMAT . 38 2.3 Time Scales . 39 2.3.1 International Atomic Time: TAI . 39 2.3.2 Terrestrial Time: TT . 40 2.3.3 Universal Time: UT1 . 40 2.3.4 Coordinated Universal Time: UTC . 41 2.4 Time Formats . 41 2.4.1 Julian Date: JD . 41 2.4.2 Modified Julian Date Format: MJD . 41 2.4.3 Gregorian Date: GD . 42 2.5 Coordinate Frames . 43 2.5.1 Earth Centered Inertial Frame: ECI . 43 vii 2.5.2 Earth-Moon Rotating Frame: EMR . 43 2.5.3 Lunar Centered Inertial Frame: LCI . 44 2.5.4 Lunar Centered Lunar Fixed Frame: LCLF . 45 2.5.5 Velocity Normal Bi-Normal Frame: VNB . 46 2.6 Orbital Dynamics: The Equations of Motion . 46 2.7 Central-Body and Third-Body Gravity . 48 2.7.1 Non-Spherical Gravity . 53 2.7.2 Atmospheric Drag . 58 2.7.3 Solar Radiation Pressure . 60 2.7.4 Relativistic Correction . 62 2.7.5 Spacecraft Thrust . 63 2.8 Numerical Propagators . 66 2.9 Solver . 70 2.10 Spacecraft Model . 74 2.11 Summary of the Mathematical Architecture . 87 2.12 Trajectory Design Algorithm . 88 2.12.1 Phase 1: Coarse TLI to Target Moon . 89 2.12.2 Phase 2: Fine Impulse TLI and LOI . 89 2.12.3 Phase 3: Coarse Finite TLI Burn . 89 2.12.4 Phase 4: Fine Finite TLI Burn . 90 2.12.5 Phase 5: Fine Finite LOI and IAB Burns . 90 2.12.6 Phase 6: RAAN Coast . 91 2.12.7 Phase 7: Fine Tune Parking Orbit for Landing . 91 viii 2.12.8 Phase 8: Initiate Descent . 93 2.12.9 Phase 9: Final Approach . 93 2.12.10 Phase 10: Braking, Parabolic Free-fall, and Landing . 94 Chapter 3: Results . 95 3.1 Data Filtration and Indexing . 95 3.1.1 PACE Output . 95 3.1.2 Filtering . 96 3.1.3 Indexing . 99 3.1.4 Analysis of Filtered Results . 101 3.2 Flyby . 101 3.3 Orbit Insertion . 113 3.4 Landing . 126 3.5 Phased Translunar Injection . 137 3.6 Low Thrust Propulsion . 141 Chapter 4: Conclusions . 145 4.1 Conclusion 1: Payload Mass Dependency . 146 4.2 Conclusion 2: Arrival Orbital Element Dependency . 148 4.3 Conclusion 3: Departure Epoch Dependency . 151 4.4 Conclusion 4: Launch Vehicle Compatibility . 153 4.5 Final Remarks . 157 Appendix A: Flyby: Nodal Cycle Performance Distribution for Optimal Departures - Mission Mass and Flight Time . 160 ix Appendix B: Flyby: Nodal Cycle Performance Distribution for Optimal Departures - ∆v and Burn Time . 166 Appendix C: Orbit Insertion: Nodal Cycle Performance Distribution for Optimal Departures - Mission Mass and Flight Time . 172 Appendix D: Orbit Insertion: Nodal Cycle Performance Distribution for Optimal Departures - ∆v and Burn Time . 178 Appendix E: Landing: Nodal Cycle Performance Distribution for Opti- mal Departures - Mission Mass and Flight Time . 184 Appendix F: Landing: Nodal Cycle Performance Distribution for Opti- mal Departures - ∆v and Burn Time . 190 Appendix G: Trajectory Design Algorithm . 196 References . 219 x LIST OF TABLES 1.1 EM1 secondary payload small satellite missions . 5 1.2 TRL 9 small satellite propulsion technologies . 7 1.3 Earth-Moon segment characteristics for the Apollo 10, 11, 12 [7][8][9] 22 1.4 Earth-Moon segment characteristics for EM1 [10] . 24 2.1 Parameter space summary . 38 2.2 Force model comparison . 69 2.3 Baseline mission assumptions . 75 2.4 Kennedy Space Center compatible launch vehicles . 76 2.5 Ti-6AI-4V Titanium mechanical properties . 80 2.6 Spacecraft subsystem power demand . 84 3.1 Direct vs phased translunar injection, full thrust . 139 3.2 Direct vs phased translunar injection, half thrust . 140 3.3 High thrust vs low thrust transfer . 143 xi LIST OF FIGURES 1.1 Simplified lunar Hohmann transfer . 10 1.2 Lunar range . 17 1.3 Lunar argument of perigee, equatorial, J2000 mean equinox . 18 1.4 Lunar RAAN, ecliptic, J2000 mean equinox . 19 1.5 Lunar inclination, ecliptic, J2000 mean equinox . 19 1.6 Lunar declination, equatorial, J2000 mean equinox . 20 1.7 Lunar inclination, equatorial, J2000 mean equinox . 20 1.8 Apollo trajectory, circular parking orbit, free return . 22 1.9 EM1 trajectory, eccentric parking orbit, near-Hohmann . 23 1.10 Beresheet/Chandrayaan 2 trajectory, multiple apogee raising burns, phasing orbits . 25 1.11 GRAIL trajectory, weak stability boundary transfer [12] . 27 1.12 Ground trace targeting with lunar orbit Keplerian elements . 30 2.1 ECI frame . 43 2.2 EMR frame . 44 2.3 LCI frame . 45 2.4 LCLF frame . 46 xii 2.5 Relative acceleration of perturbing effects in Earth Orbit, Satellite Orbits, Figure 3.1 [14] . 48 2.6 N-Body inertial reference frame . 50 2.7 GMAT integration test cases, Verification and Validation of the Gen- eral Mission Analysis Tool (GMAT), table 8 [13] . 67 2.8 Comparison of GMAT integrator performance, Verification and Val- idation of the General Mission Analysis Tool (GMAT), table 9 [13] . 67 2.9 Newton-Raphson method differential correction . 70 2.10 TLI stage subsystems architecture . 78 2.11 Algorithm phases 1 and 2 . ..
Recommended publications
  • Preface Patrick Besha, Editor Alexander Macdonald, Editor in The

    Preface Patrick Besha, Editor Alexander Macdonald, Editor in The

    EARLY DRAFT - NASAWATCH.COM/SPACEREF.COM Preface Patrick Besha, Editor Alexander MacDonald, Editor In the next decade, NASA will seek to expand humanity’s presence in space beyond the International Space Station in low-Earth orbit to a new habitation platform orbiting the moon. By the late 2020’s, astronauts will live and work far deeper in space than ever before. The push to cis-lunar orbit is part of a stepping-stone approach to extend our reach to Mars and beyond. This decision to explore ever farther destinations is a familiar pattern in the history of American space exploration. Another major pattern with historical precedent is the transition from public sector exploration to private sector commercialization. After the government has developed and demonstrated a capability in space, whether it be space-based communications or remote sensing, the private sector has realized its market potential. As new companies establish a presence, the government withdraws from the market. In 2015, we are once again at a critical stage in the development of space. The most successful long-term human habitation in space, orbiting the Earth continuously since 1998, is the International Space Station. Currently at the apex of its capabilities and the pinnacle of state-of-the-art space systems, it was developed through the investments and labors of over a dozen nations and is regularly re-supplied by cargo delivery services. Its occupants include six astronauts and numerous other organisms from Earth’s ecosystems from bacteria to plants to rats. Research is conducted on the spacecraft from hundreds of organizations worldwide ranging from academic institutions to large industrial companies and from high-tech start-ups to high-school science classes.
  • The Cubesat Mission to Study Solar Particles (Cusp) Walt Downing IEEE Life Senior Member Aerospace and Electronic Systems Society President (2020-2021)

    The Cubesat Mission to Study Solar Particles (Cusp) Walt Downing IEEE Life Senior Member Aerospace and Electronic Systems Society President (2020-2021)

    The CubeSat Mission to Study Solar Particles (CuSP) Walt Downing IEEE Life Senior Member Aerospace and Electronic Systems Society President (2020-2021) Acknowledgements – National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and CuSP Principal Investigator, Dr. Mihir Desai, Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) Feature Articles in SYSTEMS Magazine Three-part special series on Artemis I CubeSats - April 2019 (CuSP, IceCube, ArgoMoon, EQUULEUS/OMOTENASHI, & DSN) ▸ - September 2019 (CisLunar Explorers, OMOTENASHI & Iris Transponder) - March 2020 (BioSentinnel, Near-Earth Asteroid Scout, EQUULEUS, Lunar Flashlight, Lunar Polar Hydrogen Mapper, & Δ-Differential One-Way Range) Available in the AESS Resource Center https://resourcecenter.aess.ieee.org/ ▸Free for AESS members ▸ What are CubeSats? A class of small research spacecraft Built to standard dimensions (Units or “U”) ▸ - 1U = 10 cm x 10 cm x 11 cm (Roughly “cube-shaped”) ▸ - Modular: 1U, 2U, 3U, 6U or 12U in size - Weigh less than 1.33 kg per U NASA's CubeSats are dispensed from a deployer such as a Poly-Picosatellite Orbital Deployer (P-POD) ▸NASA’s CubeSat Launch initiative (CSLI) provides opportunities for small satellite payloads to fly on rockets ▸planned for upcoming launches. These CubeSats are flown as secondary payloads on previously planned missions. https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/heo/home/CubeSats_initiative What is CuSP? NASA Science Mission Directorate sponsored Heliospheric Science Mission selected in June 2015 to be launched on Artemis I. ▸ https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/heliophys ics-cubesat-to-launch-on-nasa-s-sls Support space weather research by determining proton radiation levels during solar energetic particle events and identifying suprathermal properties that could help ▸ predict geomagnetic storms.
  • Solar Sail Propulsion for Deep Space Exploration

    Solar Sail Propulsion for Deep Space Exploration

    Solar Sail Propulsion for Deep Space Exploration Les Johnson NASA George C. Marshall Space Flight Center NASA Image We tend to think of space as being big and empty… NASA Image Space Is NOT Empty. We can use the environments of space to our advantage NASA Image Solar Sails Derive Propulsion By Reflecting Photons Solar sails use photon “pressure” or force on thin, lightweight, reflective sheets to produce thrust. 4 NASA Image Real Solar Sails Are Not “Ideal” Billowed Quadrant Diffuse Reflection 4 Thrust Vector Components 4 Solar Sail Trajectory Control Solar Radiation Pressure allows inward or outward Spiral Original orbit Sail Force Force Sail Shrinking orbit Expanding orbit Solar Sails Experience VERY Small Forces NASA Image 8 Solar Sail Missions Flown Image courtesy of Univ. Surrey NASA Image Image courtesy of JAXA Image courtesy of The Planetary Society NanoSail-D (2010) IKAROS (2010) LightSail-1 & 2 CanX-7 (2016) InflateSail (2017) NASA JAXA (2015/2019) Canada EU/Univ. of Surrey The Planetary Society Earth Orbit Interplanetary Earth Orbit Earth Orbit Deployment Only Full Flight Earth Orbit Deployment Only Deployment Only Deployment / Flight 3U CubeSat 315 kg Smallsat 3U CubeSat 3U CubeSat 10 m2 196 m2 3U CubeSat <10 m2 10 m2 32 m2 9 Planned Solar Sail Missions NASA Image NASA Image NASA Image Near Earth Asteroid Scout Advanced Composite Solar Solar Cruiser (2025) NASA (2021) NASA Sail System (TBD) NASA Interplanetary Interplanetary Earth Orbit Full Flight Full Flight Full Flight 100 kg spacecraft 6U CubeSat 12U CubeSat 1653 m2 86
  • Cape Canaveral Air Force Station Support to Commercial Space Launch

    Cape Canaveral Air Force Station Support to Commercial Space Launch

    The Space Congress® Proceedings 2019 (46th) Light the Fire Jun 4th, 3:30 PM Cape Canaveral Air Force Station Support to Commercial Space Launch Thomas Ste. Marie Vice Commander, 45th Space Wing Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Ste. Marie, Thomas, "Cape Canaveral Air Force Station Support to Commercial Space Launch" (2019). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 31. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-2019-46th/presentations/31 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cape Canaveral Air Force Station Support to Commercial Space Launch Colonel Thomas Ste. Marie Vice Commander, 45th Space Wing CCAFS Launch Customers: 2013 Complex 41: ULA Atlas V (CST-100) Complex 40: SpaceX Falcon 9 Complex 37: ULA Delta IV; Delta IV Heavy Complex 46: Space Florida, Navy* Skid Strip: NGIS Pegasus Atlantic Ocean: Navy Trident II* Black text – current programs; Blue text – in work; * – sub-orbital CCAFS Launch Customers: 2013 Complex 39B: NASA SLS Complex 41: ULA Atlas V (CST-100) Complex 40: SpaceX Falcon 9 Complex 37: ULA Delta IV; Delta IV Heavy NASA Space Launch System Launch Complex 39B February 4, 2013 Complex 46: Space Florida, Navy* Skid Strip: NGIS Pegasus Atlantic Ocean: Navy Trident II* Black text – current programs;
  • Astronomy News KW RASC FRIDAY JANUARY 8 2021

    Astronomy News KW RASC FRIDAY JANUARY 8 2021

    Astronomy News KW RASC FRIDAY JANUARY 8 2021 JIM FAIRLES What to expect for spaceflight and astronomy in 2021 https://astronomy.com/news/2021/01/what-to-expect-for- spaceflight-and-astronomy-in-2021 By Corey S. Powell | Published: Monday, January 4, 2021 Whatever craziness may be happening on Earth, the coming year promises to be a spectacular one across the solar system. 2020 - It was the worst of times, it was the best of times. First landing on the lunar farside, two impressive successes in gathering samples from asteroids, the first new pieces of the Moon brought home in 44 years, close-up explorations of the Sun, and major advances in low-cost reusable rockets. First Visit to Jupiter's Trojan Asteroids First Visit to Jupiter's Trojan Asteroids In October, NASA is set to launch the Lucy spacecraft. Over its 12-year primary mission, Lucy will visit eight different asteroids. One target lies in the asteroid belt. The other seven are so-called Trojan asteroids that share an orbit with Jupiter, trapped in points of stability 60 degrees ahead of or behind the planet as it goes around the sun. These objects have been trapped in their locations for billions of years, probably since the time of the formation of the solar system. They contain preserved samples of water-rich and carbon-rich material in the outer solar system; some of that material formed Jupiter, while other bits moved inward to contribute to Earth's life-sustaining composition. As a whimsical aside: When meteorites strike carbon-rich asteroids, they create tiny carbon crystals.
  • Launch Vehicle Payload Envelope Analysis

    Launch Vehicle Payload Envelope Analysis

    CC BY-SA 4.0: Open Source Satellite 2021 Payload Envelope Envelope Payload Launch Vehicle Vehicle Launch Rich Tait, Collaborator OSSAT Analysis June 2021 June Contents Why are launcher envelopes important? Launch vehicles Envelopes Tools Further questions or want to get involved? : SA 4.0 SA - CC BY CC 2021 Satellite OpenSource Why are Launcher Envelopes Important? • Spacecraft experience the harshest mechanical environment during launch. • The mechanical environment can be described across several envelopes: • Quasi-Static Loads • Random Vibration • Acoustic • Shock • Envelopes feed the preliminary design and verification of spacecraft. : SA 4.0 SA - CC BY CC 2021 Satellite OpenSource Launch Vehicles • The analysis extends to the following launch vehicles: • Space X Falcon 9 • Rocket Labs Electron • Virgin Orbit Launcher One • Firefly Alpha • ABL RS1 • Soyuz • ArianeSpace Vega C • Envelopes have been overlayed to allow an overall envelope to be defined for the OSSAT solution. : SA 4.0 SA - CC BY CC 2021 Satellite OpenSource Quasi Static Loads • Combination of steady state and low frequency loads. • Mainly concern the primary structure. • Includes handling loads. : : SA 4.0 SA - SA 4.0 SA - CC BY CC 2021 Satellite OpenSource CC BY CC Satellite Open Source 2021 CC BY BY-SA-SA 4.0 4.0: : Open Source Source Satellite Satellite 2021 2021 • • Random Vibration Random the the launch. intensity overallof gives the GRMS launches. repeatable between Statistically CC BY BY-SA-SA 4.0 4.0: : Open Source Source Satellite Satellite 2021 2021 • • Acoustic the the launch. intensity overallof gives the OASPL the spacecraft. exterior panels of on the incident Acoustic are loads CC BY BY-SA-SA 4.0 4.0: : Open Source Source Satellite Satellite 2021 2021 • Shock Loads Shock payload separation.
  • 액체로켓 메탄엔진 개발동향 및 시사점 Development Trends of Liquid

    액체로켓 메탄엔진 개발동향 및 시사점 Development Trends of Liquid

    Journal of the Korean Society of Propulsion Engineers Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 119-143, 2021 119 Technical Paper DOI: https://doi.org/10.6108/KSPE.2021.25.2.119 액체로켓 메탄엔진 개발동향 및 시사점 임병직 a, * ㆍ 김철웅 a⋅ 이금오 a ㆍ 이기주 a ㆍ 박재성 a ㆍ 안규복 b ㆍ 남궁혁준 c ㆍ 윤영빈 d Development Trends of Liquid Methane Rocket Engine and Implications Byoungjik Lim a, * ㆍ Cheulwoong Kim a⋅ Keum-Oh Lee a ㆍ Keejoo Lee a ㆍ Jaesung Park a ㆍ Kyubok Ahn b ㆍ Hyuck-Joon Namkoung c ㆍ Youngbin Yoon d a Future Launcher R&D Program Office, Korea Aerospace Research Institute, Korea b School of Mechanical Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Korea c Guided Munitions Team, Hyundai Rotem, Korea d Department of Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University, Korea * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Selecting liquid methane as fuel is a prevailing trend for recent rocket engine developments around the world, triggered by its affordability, reusability, storability for deep space exploration, and prospect for in-situ resource utilization. Given years of time required for acquiring a new rocket engine, a national-level R&D program to develop a methane engine is highly desirable at the earliest opportunity in order to catch up with this worldwide trend towards reusing launch vehicles for competitiveness and mission flexibility. In light of the monumental cost associated with development, fabrication, and testing of a booster stage engine, it is strategically a prudent choice to start with a low-thrust engine and build up space application cases.
  • Mscthesis Joseangelgutier ... Humada.Pdf

    Mscthesis Joseangelgutier ... Humada.Pdf

    Targeting a Mars science orbit from Earth using Dual Chemical-Electric Propulsion and Ballistic Capture Jose Angel Gutierrez Ahumada Delft University of Technology TARGETING A MARS SCIENCE ORBIT FROM EARTH USING DUAL CHEMICAL-ELECTRIC PROPULSION AND BALLISTIC CAPTURE by Jose Angel Gutierrez Ahumada MSc Thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering at the Delft University of Technology, to be defended publicly on Wednesday May 8, 2019. Supervisor: Dr. Francesco Topputo, TU Delft/Politecnico di Milano Dr. Ryan Russell, The University of Texas at Austin Thesis committee: Dr. Francesco Topputo, TU Delft/Politecnico di Milano Prof. dr. ir. Pieter N.A.M. Visser, TU Delft ir. Ron Noomen, TU Delft Dr. Angelo Cervone, TU Delft This thesis is confidential and cannot be made public until December 31, 2020. An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. Cover picture adapted from https://steemitimages.com/p/2gs...QbQvi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ballistic capture is a relatively novel concept in interplanetary mission design with the potential to make Mars and other targets in the Solar System more accessible. A complete end-to-end interplanetary mission from an Earth-bound orbit to a stable science orbit around Mars (in this case, an areostationary orbit) has been conducted using this concept. Sets of initial conditions leading to ballistic capture are generated for different epochs. The influence of the dynamical model on the capture is also explored briefly. Specific capture trajectories are then selected based on a study of their stabilization into an areostationary orbit.
  • ESPA Ring Datasheet

    ESPA Ring Datasheet

    PAYLOAD ADAPTERS | ESPA ESPA THE EVOLVED SECONDARY PAYLOAD ADAPTER ESPA mounts to the standard NSSL (formerly EELV) interface bolt pattern (Atlas V, Falcon 9, Delta IV, OmegA, Vulcan, Courtesy of Lockheed Martin New Glenn) and is a drop-in component in the launch stack. Small payloads mount to ESPA ports featuring either a Ø15-inch bolt circle with 24 fasteners or a 4-point mount with pads at each corner of a 15-inch square; both of these interfaces have become small satellite standards. ESPA is qualified to carry 567 lbs (257 kg), and a Heavy interface Courtesy of NASA (with Ø5/16” fastener hardware) has been introduced with a capacity of 991 lbs (450 kg). All small satellite mass capabilities require the center of gravity (CG) to be within 20 inches (50.8 cm) of the ESPA port surface. Alternative configurations can be accommodated. ESPA GRANDE ESPA Grande is a more capable version of ESPA with Ø24-inch ports; the ring height is typically 42 inches. The Ø24-inch port has been qualified by test to Courtesy of ORBCOMM & Sierra Nevada Corp. carry small satellites up to 1543 lb (700 kg). ESPA ESPA IS ADAPTABLE TO UNIQUE MISSION REQUIREMENTS • The Air Force’s STP-1 mission delivered multiple small satellites on an Atlas V. • NASA’s Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite (LCROSS): ESPA was the spacecraft hub for the LCROSS shepherding satellite in 2009. • ORBCOMM Generation 2 (OG2) launched stacks of two and three ESPA Grandes on two different Falcon 9 missions and in total deployed 17 satellites.
  • Orbital Fueling Architectures Leveraging Commercial Launch Vehicles for More Affordable Human Exploration

    Orbital Fueling Architectures Leveraging Commercial Launch Vehicles for More Affordable Human Exploration

    ORBITAL FUELING ARCHITECTURES LEVERAGING COMMERCIAL LAUNCH VEHICLES FOR MORE AFFORDABLE HUMAN EXPLORATION by DANIEL J TIFFIN Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Science Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY January, 2020 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis of DANIEL JOSEPH TIFFIN Candidate for the degree of Master of Science*. Committee Chair Paul Barnhart, PhD Committee Member Sunniva Collins, PhD Committee Member Yasuhiro Kamotani, PhD Date of Defense 21 November, 2019 *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. 2 Table of Contents List of Tables................................................................................................................... 5 List of Figures ................................................................................................................. 6 List of Abbreviations ....................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction and Background.................................................................................. 14 1.1 Human Exploration Campaigns ....................................................................... 21 1.1.1. Previous Mars Architectures ..................................................................... 21 1.1.2. Latest Mars Architecture .........................................................................
  • Askeri Lojistikte Uzay Çağı Başlıyor Mu?

    Askeri Lojistikte Uzay Çağı Başlıyor Mu?

    Askeri Lojistikte Uzay Çağı Başlıyor mu? zay alanında 60 yıldan fazla zamandır süren insan faaliyetleri, dünyadaki yaşam kalitesini artıran toplumsal faydalar üretti. Uzay araştırmalarının zorlukları, yeni bilimsel ve teknolojik bilgileri ateşleyerek, inovasyonun temel kaynaklarından biri oldu. Uzay araştırmaları, malzeme, enerji üretimi Uve enerji depolama, geri dönüşüm ve atık yönetimi, gelişmiş robotik, tıp ve medikal teknolojiler, ulaşım, mühendislik, bilgi işlem ve yazılım gibi alanlarda dünyaya anında fayda sağladı ve sağlamaya devam edecek. Bu alanlardan biri de roket teknolojisi… Uzay ekonomisinin lokomotifi olan fırlatma sektöründe son yıllarda büyük bir değişim yaşanıyor. Yerden fırlatmalı katı yakıtlı roketlerin maliyetini azaltma arayışları, yeniden kullanılabilir fırlatıcı sistemlerinin geliştirilmesine kapı araladı. Özel uzay şirketlerinin geliştirdiği yeniden kullanılabilir roketler, uzay çalışmalarının maliyetlerini azaltıp daha fazla oyuncunun uzayın olanaklarından yararlanmasının önünü açıyor. Yakın gelecekte yeniden kullanılabilir roketler yeryüzünde de bir ulaşım aracı hâline gelebilir. Örneğin ABD Hava Kuvvetleri, bu roketleri çatışma alanlarına veya insani yardım ihtiyacı duyulan bölgelere lojistik destek sağlamakta kullanmak için harekete geçti. ABD Uzay Kuvvetleri ile birlikte yürütülen Roket Kargo (Rocket Cargo) projesi1, geleneksel askeri kargo uçakları ile saatler hatta günler alabilecek 30 ila 100 ton arasındaki sevkiyatları yeniden kullanılabilir roketlerle 90 dakika2 içinde Dünya’nın herhangi bir noktasına
  • Space Coast Is Getting Busy: 6 New Rockets Coming to Cape Canaveral, KSC

    Space Coast Is Getting Busy: 6 New Rockets Coming to Cape Canaveral, KSC

    4/16/2019 Space Coast is getting busy: 6 new rockets coming to Cape Canaveral, KSC Space Coast is getting busy: 6 new rockets coming to Cape Canaveral, Kennedy Space Center Emre Kelly, Florida Today Published 4:04 p.m. ET April 11, 2019 | Updated 7:53 a.m. ET April 12, 2019 COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. – If schedules hold, the Space Coast will live up to its name over the next two years as a half-dozen new rockets target launches from sites peppered across the Eastern Range. Company, government and military officials here at the 35th Space Symposium, an annual space conference, have reaffirmed their plans to launch rockets ranging from more traditional heavy-lift behemoths to smaller vehicles that take advantage of new manufacturing technologies. Even if some of these schedules slip, at least one thing is apparent to several spaceflight experts here: The Eastern Range is seeing an unprecedented growth in commercial space companies and efforts. Space Launch System: 2020 NASA's Space Launch System rocket launches from Kennedy Space Center's pad 39B in this rendering by the agency. (Photo: NASA) NASA's long-awaited SLS, a multibillion-dollar rocket announced in 2011, is slated to become the most powerful launch vehicle in history if it can meet a stringent late 2020 deadline. The 322-foot-tall rocket is expected to launch on its first flight – Exploration Mission 1 – from Kennedy Space Center with an uncrewed Orion capsule for a mission around the moon, which fits in with the agency's wider goal of putting humans on the surface by 2024.