<<

Karstenia 40: 71-77, 2000

Hydnellum gracilipes - a link between stipitate and resupinate Hymenomycetes

URMAS KOLJALG and PERTri RENVALL

KOLJALG, U. & RENVALL, P. 2000: Hyd.nellum gracilipes - a link between stipitate and resupinate Hymenomycetes. - Karstenia 40: 71 - 77. Helsinki. ISSN 0435-3402. and phylogeny of gracilipes (P. Karst.) P. Karst. (Thelepho­ rales, Hymenomycetes) was revised. The is characterized by soft and resupi­ nate sporocarps, and the morphology supports a close relationship with tomentelloid fungi. The phylogenetic interpretation of the sequence data from the 5' end of nuclear large subunit (nucLSU) rDNA showed, however, that the closest relatives of H. gra­ cilipes are found in the Hydnellum P. Karst. The evolution of the resupinate fruitbody is outlined. The of the species is discussed and it is proposed that H. gracilipes is a mycorrhizal . Six new localities are listed. Key words: charred wood, forest fire, fruit body evolution, Hydnellum, molecular phylogeny, , Urmas Koljalg, Institute of Botany and Ecology, University of Tartu, 40 Lai St, 51005 Tartu, Estonia and Institute of Zoology and Botany, 181 Riia St, EE 51014 Tartu, Estonia. E-mail: [email protected] Pertti Renvall, Kuopio Natural History Museum, Myhkyrinkatu 22, FIN-70100 Kuo­ pio, Finland. E-mail: [email protected]

Introduction

The original description of gracilipes P. the new collections presented here show that H. Karst. ( (P.Karst.) P. Karst.) gracilipes exhibits some morphological charac­ was validly published by Karsten (1866) in the ters which are not found in the other species of Fungi Fenniae Exs. No. 521. Two years later he the genus Hydnellum. Specimens collected from (Karsten 1868) provided a more detailed descrip­ Finland and Norway have resupinate fruit bodies tion of the species. There are three specimens of and were chiefly growing on dead wood against H. gracilipes collected by Karsten himself in the the ground. Therefore they were at first treated Botanical Museum of the University of Helsinki as tomentelloid fungi, and Renvall (1995) report­ (H). They all derive from the same locality in Tam­ ed the species as sp. 1. mela, Mustiala, and were collected in August, This paper is dedicated to Dr. Tuomo Niemela 1866. (University of Helsinki) on the occasion of his New material of Hydnellum gracilipes was 60th birthday. We here revise the systematics of collected in 1988- 1996 from northern Finland by Hydnellum gracilipes. We have utilized the 5' the second author (PR) of this paper, and in 1996 end of the nuclear large subunit (nucLSU) rDNA one collection became available from Norway. sequences to study the phylogeny of H. gra­ According to the earlier data (Maas Geesteranus cilipes. We also outline the possible evolution of 1975, Stalpers 1993, Strid 1997) this species is a the stipitate type of fruit body towards the re­ pileate and distinctly stipitate fungus. However, supinate type. 72 KOLJALG & RENVALL: HYDNELLUM GRACILIPES KARSTENIA 40 (2000)

Material and methods conditions followed Gardes and Bruns (1993). The pres­ ence of fragments was checked on a 0.6% SeaKem aga­ For light microscope studies, samples were mounted in rose gel and amplified products were purified with the 3% potassium hydroxide (KOH). In addition, Cotton QIAquick kit (Qiagen Inc.) according to the manufac­ Blue (CB) and Melzer's reagent (IKI) was used. For all turer's instructions. The direct DNA sequencing was per­ measurements pictures of the samples were grabbed to formed on an ALFexpress (Pharmacia Biotech) auto­ the computer using Sony CCD Video Camera attached to mated sequencher. Thermo Sequenase fluorescent la­ the Nikon Labophot 2 microscope and analysed by Glo­ belled primer cycle sequencing kit (Amersham Int.) and bal Lab Image (Data Translation Inc.) software. The primers LR3R, LR5, LR2l , and CTB6 were used for colour name is given according to Rayner (1970), and cycle sequencing. The sequences were edited with Se­ colour indices according to the Munsell (1976) colour quencher (GeneCodes Inc.) for the Macintosh OS and system. For the methods of scanning electron microsco­ aligned by hand. The phylogenetic and distance analyses py (SEM) see K6ljalg (1996). were performed for 27 species of Thelephorales using DNA was extracted from herbarium specimens with a beta version 4.0b2a of PAUP* by David L. Swofford modified 2% CTAB method (Sa olainen et a!., 1995) (Swofford, 1991). The calculations for the maximum and after isolation purified with GeneClean kit (Bio 101 parsimony analyses were conducted as follows: heuristic Inc.). The PCR amplification was perfonned for 5' end search, addition sequence random, number of replicates of nucLSU rDNA, using primers LROR and LR7. PCR I 000, tree bisection-reconnection (TBR) swapping and

Tomente/lopsis echinospora (GB-KHL8459) Tomente//opsis zygodesmoides (O·JS2716) [ cyaneus (H-RS 16093) Amaurodon aeruginascens (O-LR37775) Amaurodon viridis (TAA-159030) te"estris (TAA-162083) Tomente//a sublilacina (GB-KHL8457) Thelephora antocepha/a (TAA-165304) The/ephora pa/mata (TAA-159127) Tomente//a botryoides (GB-KHL8453) Tomente//a cinerascens (TAA-159555) L---- pilosa (TAA-152428) Tomente//a coerulea (TAA-153804) '------Tomentella galzinii (TAA-166821) '------Tomente//a stuposa (TAA-159498) '------Tomente//a crina/is (TAA-149492) 76[ Bankerafoligineoalba (TAA-152454) L-----'1,_,0~0-----1 Phe//odon niger (TAA-152713) tomentosum (TAA-174055) Pseudotomentella mucidu/a (O-JS21792) Pseudotomente//a humico/a (O-JS26823) .------ /eucome/aena (H-SJ24158) 57 .------ imbricatum (TAA-152707) Hydne//um aurantiacum (TAA-164119)] [ Hydnellum gracilipes (KUO-PR3728) Hydnellum (TAA -159723) '----- Hydnellumfe"ugineum (TAA-159720) '------Fomitopsis pinicola '------Fomesfomentarius

Fig. l. The most parsimonious tree showing the placement of Hydnellum gracilipes (P. Karst.) P. Karst. among Thelephorales (Length = 660). Bootstrap values >50 from 100 replications are indicated above the branch. KARSTENIA 40 (2000) KQLJALG & RENVALL: HYDNELLUM GRACILIPES 73

MULPARS ON option, gaps were treated as "missing", all parsimony and distance analyses Hydnellum 1499 characters were included from what 169 were par­ gracilipes (the specimen PR 3728) was nested simony-informative. Distance analyses included the neighbour joining with Jukes-Cantor and HKY85 substi­ together with H. aurantiacum (Batsch : Fr.) P. tution models. Karst., H. peckii Banker and H.ferrugineum (Fr. : The nomenclature of the Thelephorales follows Fr.) P. Karst. Therefore we are quite confident Stalpers (1993), K6ljalg (1996) and Strid (1997). Co­ that H. gracilipes should be kept in the genus ordinates of the Finnish localities are given according to the Finnish national uniform grid system (27°E). Her­ Hydnellum, where it was already placed by barium abbreviations are according to Holmgren et a!. Karsten (1879). Heuristic search gave a single (1990). The herbarium numbers of the voucher speci­ most parsimonious tree shown in Fig. I. mens sequenced are shown in Fig. 1. Collections are kept in the herbaria TAA, GB, H, KUO and 0 . We release here the sequence of Hydnellum gracilipes. All the oth­ Taxonomy er sequences will be published elsewhere- papers on phy­ logenetic studies of Thelephorales are under prepara­ Hydnellum gracilipes (P. Karst.) P. Karst. - (Figs. tion. The sequences of Fomitopsis pinicola (Sw.: Fr.) P. 2-4) Karst. and Fomesfomentarius (L.: Fr.) Fr. were obtained from Ellen Larsson (Uni ersity ofGoteborg) and used as Medd. Soc. FaunaFloraFenn. 5:41. 1879. - Hyd­ an outgroup. num gracilipes P. Karst., Fung. Fenn. Exsicc. 521. 1866; Notiser ur Siillskapets Pro Fauna et Flora Fennica fOrhandlingar 9: 362. 1868. - Lectotype: Results and discussion Finland. Etelii-Hiime: Tammela, Mustiala, among mosses on the ground, 674: 32, 20.VIII.l866 PA. Phylogenetic analyses Karsten 3406 (H!; selected here on the basis of Although the morphology support­ the study of the original material by S. Huhtinen). ed a close relationship to tomentelloid fungi, in - Calodon gracilipes (P. Karst.) P. Karst. in Re-

Fig. 2. Scanning electron micrograph of of Hydnellum gracilipes (P. Karst.) P. Karst. (specimen P Renvall 1062). 74 KOLJALG & RENVALL: HYDNELLUM GRACILIPES KARSTENIA 40 (2000)

Micromorphology: ! system monomit­ ic, all hyphae simple septate, dextrinoid andor cyanophilous, subicular hyphae hyaline to yel­ lowish, 2- 3.5 11m in diam., thin-walled, gloeopler­ ous hyphae present, some hyphae with brown­ ish, granular encrustation, hypha! cords absent in subiculum but present in rhizomorphs. Tramal hyphae 2-4 11m in diam, thin-walled, subparallel, some hyphae with brownish, granular encrusta­ tion, mostly hyaline to yellowish, in 3% KOH some hyphae tum first lilac and then rapidly greenish, finally the colour mostly fades away, subhymenial hyphae 2-4 11m in diam, thin-walled, hyaline in 3% KOH. Cystidia absent. Basidia cy­ anophilous and dextrinoid, clavate, with 4 sterig­ mata, simple-septate at base, without transverse septa, hyaline in 3% KOH, 20-24 x 4.5- 6.5 11m. subglobose in frontal face, ellip­ soid in lateral face, tuberculate, yellowish brown in 3% KOH, cyanophilous CB+, 3.1-4.31-lm long in frontal and lateral face (mean value 3.7flm, n = 2011 ), absent.

Specimens examined: Finland. Etelii-Hiime: Tammela, Mustiala, among mosses on the ground, 674: 32, 20.VIII.l866 PA. Karsten 3406 (H, lectotype), VIII.l866 PA. Karsten 3405 (H, isolectotype), VIII.l866 PA. Karsten 3407 (H). Koillismaa. Salla, Viir­ riii Res. Sta., on charred wood of Pinus sylvestris and on debris, 7520: 610, 10.VIII.1988 P Renvall 1062 (H); Kittiliin Lappi: Muonio, A.kiiskero SW slope, on charred wood of Pinus sylvestris and on debris, 751: 37, Fig. 3. Fruit bodies of Hydnellum gracilipes (P. Karst.) 22.VIII.1999 T. Niemela 6507 & Dai (H). Sompion Lap­ P. Karst. - A: specimen J.N Stokland 26182. - B: pi: Savukoski, Jaurujoki, Vongoivanmiinnikot, on specimen P Renvall 3728. charred wood of Pinus sylvestris and on debris, 7560: 566, 27.VIII.1993 P Renvall 3312 (KUO); Inarin Lap­ pi: Inari, Laanila, on charred wood of Pinus sylvestris and on debris, 7586: 512, 13.VIII.1996 P Renva/13654 vue11ycol.3~o.9:20. 1881;11edd. Soc.Fauna (KUO); Inari, Nukkumajoki, Lake Kivenjiirvi, on FloraFenn. 6: 16. 1881. charred wood of Pinus sylvestris and on debris, 7642: 498, 17.VIII.1996 P Renvall 3728 (KUO). GeneBank® accession number: will be added Norway. 0stfold, Riimskog, Steinsvika, on Populus AY012676. log, 20.X.1997 J.N. Stokland 26182 (0). Macromorphology: annual, re­ supinate and loosely attached to substrate, with Distribution and ecology 1 (rarely 2 or 3) centric to lateral, 10-30 mm long The original description of Hydnellum gra­ and 2-5 mm diam., -like rhizomorphs, very cilipes was based on the material collected by soft and fragile when fresh, brittle when dry. Hy­ Karsten in 1866 from Tammela, 11ustiala, south­ menophore hydnoid, purplish brown when fresh, western Finland. Karsten (1868, 1881, 1882) him­ the red tint fade to more or less greyish brown self did not report further collections and de­ during drying, near Fawn (7.5YR 5/4) when dry, scribed the species as very rare. Due to the rarity concolorous with subiculum, spines more or less H. gracilipes remained enigmatic for a long time. cylindrical, somewhat curved, tapering towards The species was not mentioned by Nikolajeva the sharp apex, 0.5-1.5 (up to -21.5) (2) mm long, ( 1961) but 11aas Geesteraanus ( 197 5) provided a 5-(6)/ cmm. Resupinate areas 1- 5 x 0. 5- 3 em wide description of the species on the basis of the and up to 1.5 (2) mm thick. type material and a collection from Sweden (So- KARSTENIA 40 (2000) KQLJALG & RENVALL: HYDNELLUM GRACILIPES 75 dermanland: Nacka, between mosses, under a position and the presence of charred wood. The fallen trunk, G. Haglund & R Rydberg 5. field layer was low-growing and scanty, being VIII.1948; UPS, not studied). Strid (1997) report­ formed by the dwarf shrubs vulgaris, ed the species from Denmark (Western Jylland), Empetrum nigrum s. lat., Vaccinium vitis-idaea, Finland (Uusimaa and Etelii-Hiime) and Sweden V myrtillus, and V uliginosum. Lichens, espe­ (Smaland). We here list five new finds from Fin­ cially Cladina spp., predominate in the ground land and the first collection from Norway. Al­ layer, intermixed with the mosses Dicranum though H. gracilipes seems to be very rare, it will fuscescens, D. scoparium, Pleurozium schreberi probably be collected increasingly during forth­ and Polytrichum juniperinum. coming years. The species should be sought es­ The habitat ecology of Hydnellum gracilipes pecially in old-growth pine forests with charred exhibits some special features. The fungus was wood in northern Fennoscandia and Russia. found five times on old, uprooted and strongly According to the ten known localities Hydnel­ charred pine trunks. The basidiocarps could be lum gracilipes is a rare fungus with a more or less detected only if the trunks were lifted or turned. northern distribution pattern. Most of the collec­ They were found on the undersides of the trunks tions derive from dry forests predominated by that were closely attached to the ground but al­ Pinus sylvestris. The Norwegian specimen, how­ ways partly also on debris below the trunks. ever, was found on a Populus log in a mature These trees had fallen long ago and had evident­ southern boreal forest of deciduous trees. The ly died, become decorticated and dried while Finnish sites were dry old-growth forests charac­ standing. After the fall-down they had experi­ terized by pine snags of different sizes, a number enced one or several forest fires. Evidently the of fallen pine trunks at different stages of decom- two top thirds of the trees had burned or com-

Fig. 4. Fruit body of Hydnellum gracilipes (P. Karst.) P. Karst. (specimen T. Niemela 6507 & Dai). Photographed in situ by T. Niemela. 76 KOLJALG & RENVALL: HYDNELLUM GRACILIPES KARSTENIA 40 (2000) pletely decomposed a long time ago but the hard, evolved from stipitate forms. He put on two hy­ resin-rich and more voluminous basal parts, potheses for the possible evolution of resupi­ though heavily damaged by fire, had survived, at nate fruitbodies, viz. "Ex hypothesi, they [resupi­ least partly, almost untouched. Therefore these nate fruit bodies, authors comm.] are derived remnants of trunks remind up-rooted natural from bracket and pileate forms from which all the stumps more than windblown trunks. form-factors of the fruit-body have most eco­ The species of Hydnellum are mycorrhizal fun­ nomically disappeared, except for the posi­ gi (Agerer 1991, 1993), and it is well supported that tively geotropic, rain-protected . Ex most resupinate tomentelloid fungi, closely relat­ hypothesi, the resupinate [ s.l., ed to stipitate Thelephorales, are mycorrhiza form­ incl. all , authors comm.] are a mix­ ers (Koljalg et a!. 2000, Koljalg et a!. submitted ture of all lines of Basidiomycetes that have manuscript). Although found on charred wood it reached this state of efficiency.". Comer's (1954) is therefore evident that also Hydnellum gra­ hypotheses were accepted, e.g., by Jiilich (1981) cilipes has a life strategy of an terrestial mycor­ but later mostly critizised (see Parmasto 1986). rhizal species. On the other hand the fungus may We will not debate here which fruit body form also contribute in decomposing the remnants of might be the most ancient in the phylogeny of woody debris, particularly charred wood. Homobasidiomycetes and how all the other types have evolved from it. For a rewiev on the phylogeny of corticioid fungi and the evolution Generic placement of Hydnellum gracilipes of the fruit body types see Parmasto (1986) and According to our view Hydnellum gracilipes Ryvarden (1991). Instead we comment on the hy­ does not have a real stipe which would bear a pothesis according to which the resupinate type . Instead, the fungus utilizes dead wood to of fruit body is a simplification of more complex support the basidiocarp. If traditional morpho­ pileate forms. logical criteria are used alone, it is therefore diffi­ The mycorrhizal life strategy is generally con­ cult to accept H. gracilipes in the genus Hydnel­ sidered as an advanced character among Basidi­ lum. The soft and very fragile resupinate sporo­ omycetes. Recent below-ground fungal commu­ carps, and the lack of real stipe are characters nity studies of ectomycorrhizal fungi (Gardes & which do not fit at all in the genus of compact and Bruns 1996, Erland & Taylor 1999) have shown tough stipitate fungi. It would be much more log­ that in a variety of forest types the most impor­ ical to try to find the closest relatives in the gen­ tant mycorrhizal fungi belong to corticioid and era Pseudotomentella Svrcek or Tomentella Pat. tomentelloid species with resupinate fruit bod­ However, the microscopical characters are more ies. Accordingly it is logical to assume that the or less the same as in the other species of Hyd­ resupinate fruit body type represents an ad­ nellum, and as shown in this study, the molecular vanced way to produce basidiospores. In addi­ data (Fig. 1) clearly support the inclusion of H. tion, the ftequence and world wide distribution gracilipes in Hydnellum. The basidiocarp mor­ of resupinate Thelephorales (tomentelloid fungi) phology also raises questions about the phylog­ seem to be much higher compared to the stipitate eny of H. gracilipes and related taxa. According fungi of the same (e.g. Stalpers 1993). to the morphological characters the species Many morphological papers have indicated seems to fall inbetween the true stipitate hyd­ that the classical form taxon Corticiaceae s. lat. nums and resupinate tomentelloid fungi. Howev­ (corticioid fungi) is a paraphyletic group. As er, instead oflumping genera together, the phylo­ clearly shown by a recent molecular study (Lars­ genetic interpretation clearly divided the taxa son et a!. 1999) corticioid fungi are represented in into different clades according to the existing a number phylogenetically homogeneous clades genera and supported the generic limits as pro­ of Homobasidiomycetes, and in these clades posed by morphology. fungi with pileate fruit body types are present as well. This supports Comer's (1954) idea that cor­ ticioid fungi represent a mixture of all phylogeny Basidiocarp evolution lines of Hymenomycetes. However, it does not Comer (1954) suggested that all "higher Basidio­ prove his hypothesis that the resupinate fruit mycetes" with resupinate fruit bodies have body type has evolved from the stipitate types. KARSTENIA 40 (2000) KQLJALG & RENVALL: HYDNELLUM GRACILIPES 77

Hydnellum gracilipes provides a unique view Karsten, P. A. 1866: Hydnum gracilipes. - Fungi Fenni­ to the evolution of different fruit body types. The ae Exs. 521. Karsten, P. A. 1868: Polyporei et Hydnacei, in paroecia stipe-like rhizomorphs may represent a degener­ Tammela crescentes. - Notiser ur Sallskapets pPro ated stipe, while the resupinate part may have Fauna et Flora Fennica Fforhandlingar 9: 357- 364. evolved from the pileus. On the other hand the Karsten, P. A. 1879: Symbolae ad Mycologiam fenni­ stipe-like organs of H. gracilipes may represent cam 6. - Medd. Soc. Fauna Flora Fenn. 5: 15-46. K6ljalg, U. 1996: Tomentella () andre­ an ancient character that belonged to fungi from lated genera in Temperate Eurasia. Synopsis Fungo­ which both resupinate and stipitate forms have rum 9: l- 213 . evolved. At the moment we are not able to Koljalg, U. , Dahlberg, A. F. S., Taylor, A. , Larsson, E., present detailed answers to these questions. H. Hallenberg, N. , Stenlid, J., Larsson, K.-H., Fransson, gracilipes is, however, a peculiar fungus and by P. M., Karen, 0. & Jonsson L. 2000: Diversity and abundance of resupinate thelephoroid fungi as ecto­ displaying the possible origin of the resupinate mycorrhizal symbionts in Swedish boreal forests . - fruitbody type it may have a special role in forth­ Molecular Ecology 9 (in press). coming studies on the phylogeny of Hymeno­ K6ljalg, U., Jakucs, E., B6ka, K. & Agerer. K Three mycetes. ectomycorrhizae with cystidia formed by different Tomentella species as revealed by rDNA ITS sequenc­ es and anatomical characteristics. - Mycological Re­ search (submitted). Acknowledgements: This study was financially support­ Larsson, K.-H., Larsson, E. & K6ljalg, U. 1999: Evolu­ ed by the Estonian Science Foundation grant no 4083 tion of corticioid aphyllophoralean fungi . - Abstracts and additional funding was provided by the Carl Sten­ of the conference "25 Years of Mycology in Tiibin­ holm Foundation. We thank Ellen Larsson for providing gen": . pp. 14- 15 . University of Tiibingen, Tiibingen. the sequences of Fornes fomentarius and Fomitopsis Maas Geesteraanus, R.A. 1975: Die terrestrischen pinicola and Jogeir N. Stockland for the Norwegian ~a­ stachelpilze Europas. - 127 pp. North-Holland Pub­ terial. Seppo Huhtinen kindly gave advice on the typifi­ lishing Comp., Amsterdam. 127 pp. cation of Hydnellum gracilipes. We also thank the cura­ Munsell, A.H. 1976: Munsell book of color. - Balti­ tors of the herbaria GB , H, KUO, 0 and TAA for arrang­ more: Munsell Color, Macbeth Division of Kollmor­ ing the loans of H. gracilipes specimens. We are indebt­ gen Corporation. ed to Erast Parmasto and Karl-Henrik Larsson for dis­ Nikolajeva, T.L. 1961: Flora Plantarum Cryptoga­ cussions on the phylogeny of the fungi involved, and to marum URSS Vol 6. Fungi 2. Familia Hydnaceae. - Tuomo Niemela for providing the colour slide. 433 pp. Academia Nauk URSS , Moskva. 433 pp. Parmasto, E. 1986: On the origin of the Hymeno­ mycetes (What are corticioid fungi?). - Windahlia References 16: 3- 19. Rayner, R.W. 1970: A mycological colour chart. - Kew: Agerer, R. 1991: Ectomycorrhizae of Sarcodon imbrica­ Commonwealth Mycological Institute and British tus on Norway spruce and their chlamydospores. - Mycological Society. Mycorrhiza 1: 21 - 30. .. Renvall, P. 1995: Community structure and dynamics of Agerer, R. 1993: Ectomycorrhizae of Hydnellum pecku wood-rotting Basidiomycetes on decomposing coni­ on Norway spruce and their chlamydospores. - Myc­ fer trunks in northern Finland. - Karstenia 35: 1- 51. ologia 85: 74- 83. Ryvarden, L. 1991: Genera ofpolypores. Nomenclature Corner, J.H. 1954: The classification of the higher fun­ and taxonomy. - Synopsis Fungorum 5: 1- 363. gi. - Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London Savolainen, V. , Cuenoud, P., Spichiger, R., Martinez, 165: 4-6. M.D.P., Michele Crevecoeur, M. & Manen, J.F. 1995: Erland, S. & Taylor, A.F.S. 1999: Resupinate ectomyc­ The use of herbarium specimens in DNA phylogenet­ orrhizal fungal genera. - In: Ectomycorrhizal fungi: ics: evaluation and improvement. - Plant Systematics key genera in profile. (eds. Cairney JWG, Chambers and Evolution 197: 87- 98. SM), pp 347- 363. Springer Verlag, Hei.delberg .. Stalpers, J.A. 1993: The Aphyllophoraceous fungi I. Gardes, M. & Bruns, T.D. 1993 : ITS pnmers with en­ Keys to the species of the Thelephorales. - Studies m hanced specificity for basidiomycetes - appltcatwn Mycology 35: 1- 168. to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. - Mo­ Strid, A. 1997: Donk In: Hansen, L. & lecular Ecology 2: 113- 118. Knudsen, H. (eds.), Nordic macromycetes 3. Hetero­ Gardes, M. & Bruns, T.D. 1996: Community structure of basidiod, aphyllophoroid and gastromycetoid basidio­ ectomycorrizal fungi in a Pinus muricata forest: mycetes:. pp. 308- 315. - Nordsvamp, Copenhagen. above- and below-ground views. - Canadian Journal of Swofford, D. L. 1999: PAUP* 4.0 Phylogenetic Analy­ Botany 74:1572 572- 1583. sis Using Parsimony. Beta Version 4.0b2. Sinauer Ass., Holmgren, P.K., Holmgren, N.H. & Barnett, L.C. 1990: Sunderland. Index herbariorum I. The herbaria of the world. 8th ed. - Regnum Vegetabile 120: 1- 693. Jiilich, W. 1981: Higher taxa of Basidiomycetes. - Bib­ liotheca Mycologica 85 , 485 pp., Cramer, Vaduz.