DOCSLIB.ORG

ICC SCA Input From

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Special Review of the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia by the Sub- Committee on Accreditation of the International Coordinating Committee of National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, 2010 Submitted by Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM) and the Education and Research Association for Consumers, Malaysia (ERA Consumer Malaysia) 1.0 Introduction This submission for the Special Review of the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) by the Sub-Committee on Accreditation (SCA) of the International Coordinating Committee of National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights (ICC) focuses on: (1) the application of the new selection process of SUHAKAM; and (2) the inclusion of the new Key Performance Indicators in the appointment and dismissal of Commissioners. Besides our assessment of these two aspects, this submission also raises another major concern with regard to SUHAKAM’s performance in the promotion and protection of human rights: The delay in the appointment of new Commissioners in 2010 following the end of the respective terms of all Commissioners from the previous batch. As a result of this delay, SUHAKAM operated without Commissioners for more than one month, seriously disrupting the work of the Commission during that period. 2.0 Flawed Application of the New Selection Process While civil society organisations anticipated the setting up of the selection committee in early 2010 (following the imminent expiration of the terms of incumbent Commissioners on 23 April 2010), no development relating to the new selection process was made public by the government until February 2010. 2.1 Selection Committee Kept Secret Among the amendments made in July 2009 was the inclusion of a new five-member selection committee which would advise the Prime Minister in the selection process. However, the Prime Minister has full discretion to appoint whoever he deems fit to represent civil society in the selection committee, raising concerns among civil society organisations. Due to these concerns, on 1 February 2010, SUARAM sent an invitation to then- SUHAKAM Chairperson Abu Talib Othman – who, as the incumbent chairperson of the Commission, is one of the two automatic members of the five-member selection 1 committee – for a dialogue with Malaysian civil society organisations to obtain updates on the selection committee, especially on how the three civil society representatives in the selection committee would be appointed and how the selection committee would carry out the selection process. However, on 4 February 2010, the then-SUHAKAM Chairperson declined SUARAM’s invitation, stating that the selection committee had already been set up but yet to meet, and as such, he was in no position to provide any information pertaining to the new selection process.1 It must be noted that the setting up of the selection committee was never announced publicly and officially by the government, and it was only through the then-SUHAKAM Chairperson’s letter that civil society organisations were informed that the selection committee had already been set up. On 1 April 2010, less than one month before the respective terms of the incumbent commissioners expired, online news portal Malaysiakini reported that it was unable to obtain confirmation of the appointment of the three “civil society representatives” in the selection committee. The news report, titled, “Suhakam replacements shrouded in secrecy”, revealed that Malaysiakini had received information from undisclosed sources that the Bar Council vice president, Lim Chee Wee; Director of NAM (Non-Aligned Movement) Institute for the Empowerment of Women Malaysia, Rafiah Salim; and former Chief Judge of Malaya, Haidar Mohamed Nor, were appointed to sit in the selection committee. However, the three individuals refused to confirm their appointments.2 It was only on 6 April 2010, when an Opposition Member of Parliament queried the government in Parliament, that Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Liew Vui Keong confirmed the three names which were reported by Malaysiakini on 1 April 2010 as the appointed “civil society representatives” in the selection committee.3 2.2 Selection Process Not Inclusive and Transparent, Extremely Short Period for Nominations Later in the month of February 2010, several Malaysian civil society organisations received letters of nomination for the selection of new commissioners. The letter, dated 12 February 2010 and signed by the Director-General of the Prime Minister Department’s Legal Affairs Unit, provided each organisation with one nomination. However, only selected organisations received this letter. The letter also stated that nominations should be made no later than 1 March 2010. Considering that most civil society organisations 1 Letter to Mr. John Liu, “Re: Invitation to a Dialogue with Malaysian NGOs on the Developments of the New Selection Process of SUHAKAM”, 4 February 2010, signed by Tan Sri Abu Talib Othman. 2 See “Suhakam replacements shrouded in secrecy”, Malaysiakini, 1 April 2010, http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/128118 (accessed on 23 June 2010). 3 Liew Vui Keong (6 April 2010) First Meeting, Third Session of Twelfth Parliament, Hansard, DR.6.4.2010 (p. 11) http://www.parlimen.gov.my/hindex/pdf/DR-06042010.pdf (accessed on 23 June 2010). 2 only received the letter in the last week of February 2010,4 the timeframe given to make nominations was extremely short. In response, SUARAM, together with two other organisations which received the nomination letter – Amnesty International Malaysia and Tenaganita – wrote a letter to the Prime Minister’s Department on 22 February 2010, urging the latter to open up the process to all members of the public by making the same nomination form available on the department’s website and announcing publicly the opening of the nomination process. This is to ensure inclusiveness in the selection process. The groups also urged the government to reveal the names of the three members of the selection process who were supposedly appointed from amongst members of civil society.5 However, none of the recommendations was implemented by the government up to the time when the names of seven new commissioners were announced on 7 June 2010. On 24 February 2010, civil society organisations sent another letter – this time signed by 29 organisations and addressed to the Chief Secretary to the Government as the designated chairperson of the selection committee – making several demands with regard to the selection process, inter alia: - That the selection committee to ensures that members of the Commission be selected from a pool of qualified candidates proposed through a transparent, participatory and inclusive process guided by the Paris Principles and international human rights standards. On this aspect, the 29 civil society organisations recommended that the selection committee makes public through its own means all names and profiles of candidates received and being considered. - That the selection committee holds public interviews where each candidate’s qualifications, competence and integrity can be thoroughly and adequately reviewed by the selection committee, with the public fully informed of the process, merits of each candidate, as well as the basis of the committee’s decisions.6 However, as was the case with the Prime Minister’s Department, none of the recommendations by civil society was implemented in the entire process – up until the announcement of the names of the new commissioners. Both the Prime Minister’s Department (which coordinated the selection process) and the Chief Secretary to the Government in his capacity as the designated chairperson of the selection committee did not reply to the letters sent to them by civil society organisations. Subsequently, the selection committee operated in a secretive manner, with no news or statements on the development of the status of the selection process. 4 SUARAM received the official nomination letter by post on 22 February 2010. 5 Letter to Dato’ Abdullah Sani Ab Hamid, “Re: Nominations for the Appointment of Members of the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) for 2010-2013”, 22 February 2010, signed by SUARAM, Amnesty International Malaysia, and Tenagnita. 6 Letter to Tan Sri Mohd Sidek Haji Hassan, “Re: New Selection Process of Members of the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM)”, 24 February 2010, signed by 29 civil society organisations. 3 2.3 Government Says NGOs Need Not Be Consulted On 6 April 2010, Opposition Member of Parliament Teresa Kok questioned the government of its reasons for not consulting with civil society before setting up its selection committee. In response, Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department replied by saying, “There is no provision in the enabling law of SUHAKAM that says the Prime Minister needed to discuss with NGOs before making the appointments.”7 2.4 Two Candidates Omitted – No Explanation by the Government Then on 21 April 2010, newspaper The Star reported that the selection committee has selected nine names to be considered by the Prime Minister for the appointment to SUHAKAM. They were:8 1. Malaysia’s former United Nations permanent representative Tan Sri Hasmy Agam; 2. Indigenous rights activist Jannie Lasimbang from Sabah; 3. National Customary Rights advocate and lawyer Detta Samen from Sarawak, 4. Children’s rights activist Dr James Nayagam; 5. Women’s rights activist Maria Chin Abdullah; 6. FOMCA (Federation of Malaysian Consumers Associations) secretary-general Muhammad Sha’ani Abdullah; 7. Former ABIM (Malaysian Islamic Youth Movement) president Ahmad Azam Abdul Rahman; 8. Universiti Malaya deputy vice-chancellor Prof Datuk Dr Khaw Lake Tee; and 9. International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilisation deputy dean Prof Datuk Dr Mahmood Zuhdi Abd Majid. Following this, there was no further development for more than one month until the Prime Minister finally announced the appointment of seven new Commissioners on 7 June 2010, with former diplomat Hasmy Agam named as the Chairperson of the Commission.9 All seven were part of the nine names recommended by the selection committee to the Prime Minister.
Recommended publications
  • Prk Kerusi Parlimen Pasca Pru-14 Di Sabah: P186- Sandakan, P176-Kimanis, P185-Batu Sapi Dan Darurat

    Prk Kerusi Parlimen Pasca Pru-14 Di Sabah: P186- Sandakan, P176-Kimanis, P185-Batu Sapi Dan Darurat

    Volume 6 Issue 23 (April 2021) PP. 200-214 DOI 10.35631/IJLGC.6230014 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW, GOVERNMENT AND COMMUNICATION (IJLGC) www.ijlgc.com PRK KERUSI PARLIMEN PASCA PRU-14 DI SABAH: P186- SANDAKAN, P176-KIMANIS, P185-BATU SAPI DAN DARURAT THE POST GE-14 PARLIAMENTARY SEAT BY-ELECTIONS IN SABAH: P186- SANDAKAN, P176-KIMANIS, P185-BATU SAPI AND THE EMERGENCY Mohd Azri Ibrahim1*, Romzi Ationg2*, Mohd Sohaimi Esa3*, Irma Wani Othman4*, Saifulazry Mokhtar5 & Abang Mohd Razif Abang Muis6 1 Centre for the Promotion of Knowledge and Language Learning, Universiti Malaysia Sabah Email: [email protected] 2 Centre for the Promotion of Knowledge and Language Learning, Universiti Malaysia Sabah Email: [email protected] 3 Centre for the Promotion of Knowledge and Language Learning, Universiti Malaysia Sabah Email: [email protected] 4 Centre for the Promotion of Knowledge and Language Learning, Universiti Malaysia Sabah Email: [email protected] 5 Centre for the Promotion of Knowledge and Language Learning, Universiti Malaysia Sabah Email: [email protected] 6 Centre for the Promotion of Knowledge and Language Learning, Universiti Malaysia Sabah Email: [email protected] * Corresponding Author Article Info: Abstrak: Article history: Kertas kerja ini mengetengahkan perbincangan tentang pelaksanaan mahupun Received date: 15.01.2021 penangguhan Pilihanraya Kecil (PRK) di Sabah dalam era pasca Pilihanraya Revised date: 15.02.2021 Umum ke-14 (PRU-14) dan kaitannya dengan pelaksanaan Perintah Kawalan Accepted date: 15.03.2021 Pergerakan (PKP) serta darurat. Secara khusus, kertas kerja ini Published date: 30.04.2021 membincangkan secara mendalam pelaksanaan PRK di P186 Sandakan dan To cite this document: P176 Kimanis.
  • Circular No 279/2011 Dated 25 Nov 2011 Dear Members of the Malaysian Bar Walk for Freedom 2011: Peaceful Assembly Bill Cannot An

    Circular No 279/2011 Dated 25 Nov 2011 Dear Members of the Malaysian Bar Walk for Freedom 2011: Peaceful Assembly Bill Cannot An

    Circular No 279/2011 Dated 25 Nov 2011 Dear Members of the Malaysian Bar Walk For Freedom 2011: Peaceful Assembly Bill Cannot And Must Not Become Law! Tuesday, 29 Nov 2011 at 11:30 am, From Royal Lake Club to Parliament Martin Luther King Jr once said that “the ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.” The Malaysian Bar and indeed Malaysia is now facing such a moment of challenge and controversy — an objectionable Bill, being rushed into law with unseemly haste without adequate public consultation, which effectively robs the rakyat of our constitutional right to freedom of assembly. This Peaceful Assembly Bill (“Bill”) is far more restrictive than the current law. It is not a piece of legislation which we, as lawyers, can watch enter our statute books without standing up against it. It is not a piece of legislation which we want future generations to inherit, without us walking, and spending every ounce of our energy to oppose. If this piece of legislation makes it to the statute books, future generations would inherit a nation that is far from modern and progressive. Members of the Bar are now called upon to march to object to this Bill. The walk will take place next Tuesday, 29 Nov 2011, from the entrance of the Royal Lake Club to Parliament House, to deliver the Bar’s Proposed Amendments to the Peaceful Assembly Bill to YB Datuk Liew Vui Keong, Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department.
  • Drug Offences and the Death Penalty in Malaysia: Fair Trial Rights and Ramifications

    Drug Offences and the Death Penalty in Malaysia: Fair Trial Rights and Ramifications

    Drug Offences and the Death Penalty in Malaysia: Fair Trial Rights and Ramifications Natalia Antolak-Saper Sara Kowal Samira Lindsey Ngeow Chow Ying Thaatchaayini Kananatu with the support of Harm Reduction International MONASH LAW 1 | Drug Offences and the Death Penalty in Malaysia: Fair Trial Rights and Ramifications Faculty of Law, Monash University, Building 12, 15 Ancora Imparo Way Clayton, Victoria, 3800 Australia Telephone: +61 3 9902 6000 Website: https://www.monash.edu/law © Monash University 2020 CRICOS provider: Monash University 00008C Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this report are not necessarily those held by Monash University. 2 | Drug Offences and the Death Penalty in Malaysia: Fair Trial Rights and Ramifications Contents Introduction 5 Current Composition of Death Row in Malaysia 5 Drug Offending and the Death Penalty 6 Part 1. Death Penalty Legal Frameworks 7 1.1 Malaysian criminal justice system 7 1.2 International death penalty frameworks 8 1.3 Exclusions in the Application of the Death Penalty 9 Part 2. Fair Trial Legal Frameworks and the death penalty 10 2.1 Malaysian Legal Framework 10 2.2 International Legal Framework 11 2.3 Mandatory Death Penalty 12 Part 3. Fair Trial standards in practice in Malaysia 14 3.1 Right to be Presumed Innocent Until Proven Guilty 15 3.2 Right to be Informed Promptly and in Detail, in a Language which the Accused Understands, of the Nature and Cause of the Charge Against Him or Her 15 (a) Transparency 15 (b) Discovery 17 3.3 Right to have Adequate Time and Facility to Prepare a Defence and Communicate with Counsel of the Accused’s Own Choosing 18 3.4 Right to Choose Legal Assistance, and if Unable to Select Legal Assistance, the Right to State- provided Legal Assistance 19 (a) Effective Counsel 19 (b) Counsel of Choice 20 (c) Appeal Representation 20 3.5 Right to be Tried Without Undue Delay 21 3.6 Right to Have an Interpreter 22 Case Study 22 3.7 Privilege Against Self-incrimination 23 3.8 Right to Appeal Conviction and Sentence 24 (a) Appeal 24 (b) Revision 25 (c) Clemency 26 Case Study 27 Part 4.
  • Aturan Urusan Mesyuarat

    Aturan Urusan Mesyuarat

    MALAYSIA DEWAN RAKYAT ATURAN URUSAN MESYUARAT NASKAH SAHIH/BAHASA MALAYSIA http://www.parlimen.gov.my HARI SELASA, 28 JULAI 2020, PUKUL 10.00 PAGI Bil. 5 WAKTU PERTANYAAN-PERTANYAAN MENTERI 1. PR-1432-MQT0877 Dato' Sri Hajah Rohani binti Haji Abdul Karim [ Batang Lupar ] minta MENTERI PERUMAHAN DAN KERAJAAN TEMPATAN menyatakan apakah inisiatif yang telah diambil oleh Kementerian untuk menambahkan bilangan anggota bomba wanita khususnya di kalangan pegawai di dalam Jabatan Bomba dan Penyelamat Malaysia. 2. PR-1432-MQT0868 Tuan Wong Hon Wai [ Bukit Bendera ] minta MENTERI WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN menyatakan apakah rasional keputusan DBKL untuk penggantungan pengeluaran lesen arak di Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur dan bilakah pengeluaran lesen akan disambung semula. 3. PR-1432-MQT0876 Tuan Chong Chieng Jen [ Stampin ] minta MENTERI KESIHATAN menyatakan tentang pelan Kementerian untuk menangani isu peningkatan kes COVID-19 di Kuching terutamanya di kalangan kluster Sentosa yang melibatkan kakitangan hospital Kerajaan, 'the frontliners'. Apakah langkah tambahan yang akan diambil Kementerian untuk melindungi dan menjaga kebajikan pekerja-pekerja kesihatan, pesakit dan juga orang awam di persekitaran hospital tersebut dan juga apakah langkah tambahan untuk membendung penularan wabak COVID-19 di Kuching serta membantu peniaga-peniaga yang terjejas akibat pandemik itu. MALAYSIA DEWAN RAKYAT ATURAN URUSAN MESYUARAT NASKAH SAHIH/BAHASA MALAYSIA http://www.parlimen.gov.my HARI SELASA, 28 JULAI 2020, PUKUL 10.00 PAGI Bil. 11 WAKTU PERTANYAAN-PERTANYAAN MENTERI PERTANYAAN-PERTANYAAN BAGI JAWAB LISAN 1. PR-1432-L09070 Tuan Ramli bin Dato' Mohd Nor [ Cameron Highlands ] minta PERDANA MENTERI menyatakan apakah tindakan yang dilakukan oleh pihak Kerajaan dalam menangani isu sindiket warga asing yang mengambil kesempatan meneroka tanah-tanah di pelbagai kawasan yang belum dibangunkan Kerajaan dan pemiliknya dan apakah tindakan yang dikenakan terhadap individu warganegara Malaysia yang menjadi dalang dalam sindiket ini.
  • Countries at the Crossroads 2012: Malaysia

    Countries at the Crossroads 2012: Malaysia

    COUNTRIES AT THE CROSSROADS Countries at the Crossroads 2012: Malaysia Introduction Malaysia has over 28 million people, of whom approximately 63 percent are ethnic Malay, 25 percent Chinese, 7 percent Indian, and 4 percent Ibans and Kadazan-Dusun.1 Much of this diversity was created through the British formation of an extractive colonial economy, with the “indigenous” Malay community ordered into small holdings and rice cultivation, while the “non-Malays” were recruited from China and India into tin mining and plantation agriculture. Further, in preparing the territory for independence in 1957, the British fashioned a polity that was formally democratic, but would soon be encrusted by authoritarian controls. Throughout the 1960s, greater urbanization brought many Malays to the cities, where they encountered the comparative prosperity of the non-Malays. They perceived the multiethnic coalition that ruled the country, anchored by the United Malays National Organization (UMNO), but including the Malayan Chinese Association (MCA) and the Malayan Indian Congress (MIC), as doing little to enhance their living standards. At the same time, many non-Malays grew alienated by the discrimination they faced in accessing public sector resources. Thus, as voters in both communities swung to opposition parties in an election held in May 1969, the UMNO-led coalition, known as the Alliance, was gravely weakened. Shortly afterward, Malays and Chinese clashed in the capital, Kuala Lumpur, sparking ethnic rioting known as the May 13th incident. Two years of emergency rule followed during which parliament was closed. As the price for reopening parliament in 1971, UMNO imposed new curbs on civil liberties, thereby banning any questioning of the Malay “special rights” that are enshrined in constitution’s Article 153.
  • Undocumented Migrants and Refugees in Malaysia: Raids, Detention and Discrimination

    Undocumented Migrants and Refugees in Malaysia: Raids, Detention and Discrimination

    Undocumented migrants and refugees in Malaysia: Raids, Detention and Discrimination INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................................................................4 CHAPTER I - THE MALAYSIAN CONTEXT................................................................................................................................6 CHAPTER II – THE DE FACTO STATUS OF REFUGEES AND ASYLUM SEEKERS ..............................................................9 CHAPTER III – RELA, THE PEOPLE’S VOLUNTEER CORPS ...............................................................................................11 CHAPTER IV – JUDICIAL REMEDIES AND DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY .............................................................................14 CHAPTER V – THE SITUATION OF CHILDREN......................................................................................................................15 CHAPTER VI – CONDITIONS OF DETENTION, PUNISHMENT AND SANCTIONS...............................................................18 RECOMMENDATIONS...............................................................................................................................................................23 APPENDICE: LIST OF PERSONS MET BY THE MISSION .....................................................................................................29 March 2008 - N°489/2 Undocumented migrants and refugees in Malaysia: Raids, Detention and Discrimination
  • Newsletter 3/2018 July-December 2018 Embassy of Malaysia, Italy Embassy of Malaysia Hosted the 61St National Day Reception of M

    Newsletter 3/2018 July-December 2018 Embassy of Malaysia, Italy Embassy of Malaysia Hosted the 61St National Day Reception of M

    CIAO MALAYSIA Newsletter 3/2018 July-December 2018 Embassy of Malaysia, Italy Embassy of Malaysia hosted the 61st National Day Reception of Malaysia on 26 September 2018. It was attended by members of the diplomatic community, Italian government officials and private sectors and Malaysians in Italy. In his remark, Dato’ Malik hopes that the Malaysia-Italy relations would escalate further. On 16 September 2018, TYT Dato’ Malik organized the Malaysian Day celebration with Malaysians residing in Italy at Rumah Malaysia. The celebration was attended by almost 60 people. Malaysians sang the Negaraku followed by a cake cutting ceremony. It was a good gathering as Malaysians could mingle amongst themselves and at the same time enjoy the wonderful Malaysian cuisine prepared. MALAYSIA – ITALY SENIOR OFFICIALS BILATERAL CONSULTATIONS, ROME 2018 On 2 August 2018, the Senior Officials Bilateral Consultations were held at the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation. The Malaysian delegation was led by H.E. Raja Dato’ Nushirwan Zainal Abidin, Deputy Secretary General, Ministry of Foreign Affairs Malaysia, while the Italian side was led by H.E. Massimo Gaiani, Director General Global Affairs. The consultation was fruitful and both parties were glad to convene this meeting since the last time in 2009. Prior to the consultations, H.E. Raja Dato’ Nushirwan called on H.E. Elisabetta Belloni, Secretary General of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Italy. On 8 August 2018, H.E. Dato’ Abdul Malik Melvin Castelino as the current Chairman of ASEAN Community in Rome (ACR) hosted the 51st Anniversary of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) at the Embassy of Malaysia in Italy.
  • Federal-State Relations Under the Pakatan Harapan Government

    Federal-State Relations Under the Pakatan Harapan Government

    FEDERAL-STATE RELATIONS UNDER THE PAKATAN HARAPAN GOVERNMENT Tricia Yeoh TRENDS IN SOUTHEAST ASIA ISSN 0219-3213 TRS12/20s ISSUE ISBN 978-9-814951-13-5 30 Heng Mui Keng Terrace 12 Singapore 119614 http://bookshop.iseas.edu.sg 9 7 8 9 8 1 4 9 5 1 1 3 5 2020 TRENDS IN SOUTHEAST ASIA 20-J07166 01 Trends_2020-12.indd 1 5/10/20 2:25 PM The ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute (formerly Institute of Southeast Asian Studies) is an autonomous organization established in 1968. It is a regional centre dedicated to the study of socio-political, security, and economic trends and developments in Southeast Asia and its wider geostrategic and economic environment. The Institute’s research programmes are grouped under Regional Economic Studies (RES), Regional Strategic and Political Studies (RSPS), and Regional Social and Cultural Studies (RSCS). The Institute is also home to the ASEAN Studies Centre (ASC), the Singapore APEC Study Centre and the Temasek History Research Centre (THRC). ISEAS Publishing, an established academic press, has issued more than 2,000 books and journals. It is the largest scholarly publisher of research about Southeast Asia from within the region. ISEAS Publishing works with many other academic and trade publishers and distributors to disseminate important research and analyses from and about Southeast Asia to the rest of the world. 20-J07166 01 Trends_2020-12.indd 2 5/10/20 2:25 PM FEDERAL-STATE RELATIONS UNDER THE PAKATAN HARAPAN GOVERNMENT Tricia Yeoh ISSUE 12 2020 20-J07166 01 Trends_2020-12.indd 3 5/10/20 2:25 PM Published by: ISEAS Publishing 30 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119614 [email protected] http://bookshop.iseas.edu.sg © 2020 ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute, Singapore All rights reserved.
  • Malaysia's Anti-Fake News

    Malaysia's Anti-Fake News

    TERRORISM DILEMMAS AND DEMOCRACY Malaysia’s Anti-Fake News Act A cog in an arsenal of anti-free speech laws and a bold promise of reforms Abstract: Malaysia’s surprising fourteenth general election result in May 2018 was widely hailed as the advent of a seismic shift for press freedom in the country. The country’s draconian media control armoury was often wantonly and oppressively applied over six decades under previous rule. Key actors from that era are now presiding over bold reforms that have been promised by the new government. In keeping with its election promises, the new govern- ment sought to repeal the hastily and badly drafted Anti-Fake News Act 2018 (AFNA). The Attorney-General Tommy Thomas wrote scathingly before the Act was passed and before taking office as the new A-G: The draconian effect of the entire bill renders it unconstitutional…This is a disgraceful piece of legislation drafted by a desperate government determined to crush dissent and silence critics. The bill is so hastily and poorly drafted that it cannot under any circumstances be improved by amendment. Instead, it must be rejected outright. (Thomas, 2018) The repeal effort, however, failed and the Act remains technically on the books. This article examines the Act against a backdrop of global responses to the ‘fake news’ phenomenon; provides an overview of Malaysia’s draconian armoury of laws that impinge on freedom of expression; discusses the fad- ing optimism for proper media regulation reform in Malaysia; and concludes that meaningful media regulation reform must go beyond repealing AFNA.
  • Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM) Is Committed to Defending and Campaigning for Human Rights in Malaysia and Other Parts of the World

    Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM) Is Committed to Defending and Campaigning for Human Rights in Malaysia and Other Parts of the World

    Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM) is committed to defending and campaigning for human rights in Malaysia and other parts of the world. The organisation began in 1989 as a campaign body for the abolition of the Internal Security Act (ISA) in the aftermath of the infamous Operasi Lalang when 106 Malaysians were detained without trial. Since then, it has evolved into the leading human rights organisation in Malaysia, committed to protecting, preserving and promoting human rights. Produced by: Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM) Suara Inisiatif Sdn Bhd (562530-P) Office Address: 433A, Jalan 5/46, Malaysia: Gasing Indah, 46000 Petaling Jaya, Human Rights Selangor, Malaysia. Report 2014 Tel: +603 - 7784 3525 Fax: +603 - 7784 3526 OVERVIEW Email: [email protected] www.suaram.net Photo credit: Victor Chin, Rakan Mantin. MALAYSIA: HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT OVERVIEW 2014 1 Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM) CONTENTS Introduction 2 Detention Without Trial 4 Police Abuses of Power 6 Freedom of Expression and Information 10 Freedom of Assembly 14 Freedom of Association 16 Freedom of Religion 18 Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Migrant Workers 23 Death Penalty 27 Free and Fair Elections 27 Corruption and Accountability 30 Law and the Judiciary 32 Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) 36 MALAYSIA: HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT OVERVIEW 2014 2 Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM) INTRODUCTION In 2014, the human rights record under the Najib Razak administration has hit a new low. When he first came to power in 2009, Najib Razak introduced several reforms in an attempt to win back votes after the fiasco for the ruling coalition in the 2008 general election. This attempt at reform has been reversed after yet another debacle for BN in the 2013 general election, epitomized by the about-turn decision on the promise to repeal the Sedition Act, with the Prime Minister seemingly bowing down to demands of extremist groups for his own political survival and bent on teaching dissenting voters a lesson.
  • ASEAS - Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 2(2), 102-121

    ASEAS - Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 2(2), 102-121

    www.ssoar.info Continuity in a changing world: Malaysia's coercive security apparatus in the age of terror and beyond Humphreys, Andrew Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Humphreys, A. (2009). Continuity in a changing world: Malaysia's coercive security apparatus in the age of terror and beyond. ASEAS - Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 2(2), 102-121. https://nbn-resolving.org/ urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-362857 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de ASEAS 2 (2) Aktuelle Südostasienforschung / Current Research on South-East Asia Continuity in a Changing World: Malaysia’s Coercive Security Apparatus in the Age of Terror and Beyond Andrew Humphreys1 University of Wollongong, Australia ASEAS - Österreichische Zeitschrift für Südostasienwissenschaften / Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies SEAS - Gesellschaft für Südostasienwissenschaften / Society for South-East Asian Studies - www.SEAS.at The Malaysian government’s use of its repressive security legislation has had a signifi cant impact on Malaysia’s modern political history. The focus of the present article is on the government’s use of its coercive security apparatus since the terrorist attacks of 9/11. My argument is that the apparatus is largely unchanged by the current global climate of the ‘War on Terror.’ Notably, Malaysia’s use of coercion has become increasingly less criticized by other governments, notably those in the West.
  • Isolation and Desolation

    Isolation and Desolation

    ISOLATION AND DESOLATION CONDITIONS OF DETENTION OF PEOPLE SENTENCED TO DEATH ISOLATION AND DESOLATION MALAYSIA CONDITIONS OF DETENTION OF PEOPLE SENTENCED TO DEATH MALAYSIA “Prolonged detention of individuals sentenced to death is inhumane and is detrimental to their mental health.” - Dr Suarn Singh, former Head of Psychiatric Services of the Ministry of Health of Malaysia and psychiatry expert before CAROLE BERRIH Malaysian criminal courts. MALAYSIA NGEOW CHOW YING “During the day, I am allowed to leave the cell for a period of time, sometimes 45 minutes, sometimes more than that. But we will still be in the building, in the main hall. I just walk around. » - Michelle, Chinese woman sentenced to death in 2015. This book is derived from a fact-finding mission carried out in Malaysia from July 2019 to February 2020 by ADPAN and ECPM (Together Against the Death Penalty). It was led by an ADPAN member and two lawyers from the Malaysian Bar Council, who conducted semi-directive individual interviews with death row prisoners, relatives of people sentenced to death, faith-based organisations providing religious counselling in prison, lawyers and psychiatrists in Malaysia. Carole Berrih, the author of the report, accurately uses all the accounts collected and puts them in the context of the country’s criminal and penitentiary systems. This report is part of the “Fact-Finding mission on death row” collection which aims to make an assessment of the living conditions on death row in various countries across the world. The goal is both to report on the reality of death row and to engage public opinion.