Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Limited
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Barriers to Training for Older Workers and Possible Policy Solutions. SPONS AGENCY Australian Dept
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 476 321 CE 084 936 AUTHOR Wooden, Mark; VandenHeuvel, Adriana; Cully, Mark; Curtain, Richard TITLE Barriers to Training for Older Workers and Possible Policy Solutions. SPONS AGENCY Australian Dept. of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Canberra. PUB DATE 2001-01-00 NOTE 314p.; Produced by Flinders University of South Australia, National Institute of Labour Studies. AVAILABLE FROM For full text: http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/ iae/documents/olderworkers/olderwo rkersv4.pdf. PUB TYPE Opinion Papers (120) Reports Research (143) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PC13 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Access to Education; Adult Education; Age Discrimination; Developed Nations; Employee Attitudes; Employer Employee Relationship; Foreign Countries; *Job Training; Labor Force Development; Labor Market; Lifelong Learning; Middle Aged Adults; *Older Workers; Participant Characteristics; *Participant Satisfaction; *Participation; Personnel Management; Policy Formation IDENTIFIERS *Australia; *Barriers to Participation ABSTRACT This report covers a study of barriers for older workers in obtaining and benefitting from training and innovative policies to remove them. After an introduction, Chapter 2 reviews literature on incidence and determinants of older workers' participation in training; barriers to training; and employer and government initiatives to enhance older persons' access to training. Chapter 3 uses existing secondary data sets to provide an overview of older workers' labor market position; quantify differences in training experiences across cohorts; identify characteristics associated with relatively low levels of training participation and perceived barriers to training participation; and examine variations across cohorts in assessments of the value of training. Chapter 4 presents key findings from focus groups of older persons and human resource managers about their reactions to main findings from the literature review and data analysis and to canvas reactions to policy options to address barriers to training. -
Jump on Board High-Performing Not-For-Profit Boards in Fundraising
JUMP ON BOARD HIGH-PERFORMING NOT-FOR-PROFIT BOARDS IN FUNDRAISING November 2019 PREPARED BY Melissa Smith Director & Founder, Noble Ambition in partnership with Perpetual ABOUT THE AUTHOR Melissa is former Global Fundraiser of the Year (IFC, 2011) and Australian Fundraiser of the Year (FIA, 2011). She has facilitated philanthropic giving across education, the arts and health, and worked with hundreds of donors in Australia, Asia and the United States. Melissa has led four fundraising programs from start-up to established, from Powerhouse Museum and Sydney Opera House in the arts, to University of Technology, Sydney and RMIT University, in education. Melissa has a BA Hons (First Class, USyd), Masters of Management (UTS); is a Churchill Fellow (2007) and a graduate of University of Melbourne’s Asialink Leaders Program and Benevolent Society’s Sydney Leadership Program. She has presented her research internationally in areas including the impact of culture on philanthropy, international best practice in arts philanthropy, and the role of leadership in philanthropy. Melissa’s lifelong interest and experience enables her to understand both philanthropy and fundraising. As a thought leader in the philanthropic and fundraising sector, she is in the privileged position of possessing the practical and strategic skills to support both pillars equally. Jump on Board: High-performing not-for-profit boards in fundraising 2 Philanthropic fundraising in Australia is in a state of rapid change. While mass giving is in decline, major gifts are on the rise, and in coming years we will see the largest intergenerational transfer of wealth in our nation’s history. This undoubtedly presents an exciting opportunity for the non-for-profit (NFP) sector to attract significant support, but also raises questions about how prepared NFPs are to maximise this opportunity. -
Scheme Booklet Supplement
Scheme Booklet Supplement This booklet contains a copy of the Independent Expert’s Report, the Investigating Accountant’s Report and the Merger Implementation Agreement For a proposal to merge St.George Bank Limited (ABN 92 055 513 070) and Westpac Banking Corporation (ABN 33 007 457 141) If you are in any doubt as to how to deal with this document, please consult your financial, legal, tax or other professional adviser immediately. Financial adviser to Legal adviser to St.George Bank Limited St.George Bank Limited St.George Bank Limited (ABN 92 055 513 070) 2 Important notices Contents Purpose of this Scheme Booklet Supplement Consents Important notices IFC This Scheme Booklet Supplement provides St.George Consent to be named Security Holders with additional information about the The following persons have given and have not, before 1. Independent Expert’s Report 1 Merger Proposal, SAINTS Scheme and Option Scheme. the date of this Scheme Booklet Supplement, withdrawn This additional information is in addition to the Scheme their written consent to be named in this Scheme 2. Investigating Accountant’s Report 181 Booklet dated 29 September 2008. Booklet Supplement in the form and context in which 3. Merger Implementation Agreement 189 they are named: UBS as financial adviser to St.George; St.George Security Holders should read the Scheme PricewaterhouseCoopers Securities Ltd as the Corporate directory IBC Booklet in its entirety before making a decision as to how Investigating Accountant; Grant Samuel & Associates Pty to vote on the resolutions to be considered at the relevant Limited as the Independent Expert; Allens Arthur Robinson Scheme Meeting and the Extraordinary General Meeting. -
Registration Document 3/2016 Barclays Bank Plc
REGISTRATION DOCUMENT 3/2016 BARCLAYS BANK PLC Incorporated with limited liability in England and Wales REGISTRATION DOCUMENT ___________________________________________________________________ This registration document dated 1 June 2016 "Registration Document" constitutes a registration document for the purposes of Article 53 of Directive 2003/71/EC as amended, including by Directive 2010/73/EU, "Prospectus Directive" and has been prepared for the purpose of giving information with respect to Barclays Bank PLC "Issuer" which, according to the particular nature of the relevant transaction is necessary to enable investors to make an informed assessment of the assets and liabilities, financial position, profit and losses and prospects of the Issuer. The Issuer accepts responsibility for the information contained in this Registration Document and declares that, having taken all reasonable care to ensure that such is the case, the information contained in this Registration Document is, to the best of its knowledge, in accordance with the facts and contains no omission likely to affect its import. This Registration Document has been approved by the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority "FCA", which is the United Kingdom's competent authority for the purposes of the Prospectus Directive and the relevant implementing measures in the United Kingdom, as a registration document issued in compliance with the Prospectus Directive and the relevant implementing measures in the United Kingdom for the purpose of giving information with regard to the Issuer. The credit ratings included or referred to in this Registration Document will be treated for the purposes of Regulation EC No 1060/2009 on credit rating agencies as amended, "CRA Regulation" as having been issued by Fitch Ratings Limited, Moody's Investors Service Ltd. -
Female Participation on Boards of ASX200 Alphabetic by Company
Female participation on boards of ASX200 Alphabetic by company ASX Code Company Chair State Industry Group Name 2009 2009 2009 % total female female directors directors Totals 1,474 128 8.7 ABP Abacus Property Group Mr John Thame NSW Real Estate 7 0 0.0 ABC Adelaide Brighton Limited Mr MA Kinnaird SA Materials 6 0 0.0 AGK AGL Energy Limited Mr Mark Johnson NSW Utilities 9 1 11.1 AJL AJ Lucas Group Ltd Mr Allan S Campbell NSW Capital Goods 5 0 0.0 ALS Alesco Corporation Limited Mr Sean Wareing NSW Capital Goods 8 0 0.0 AWC Alumina Limited Mr Donald Morley VIC Materials 6 1 16.7 AMC Amcor Limited Mr Chris Roberts VIC Materials 8 1 12.5 AMP AMP Limited Mr Peter Mason NSW Insurance 8 1 12.5 ANN Ansell Limited Mr Peter Barnes VIC Health Care Equipment & Services 7 1 14.3 APA APA Group Mr Leonard Bleasel NSW Utilities 7 0 0.0 APN APN News & Media Limited Mr Gavin O'Reilly NSW Media 10 0 0.0 AQP Aquarius Platinum Limited Mr Nicholas Sibley WA Materials 8 0 0.0 AQA Aquila Resources Mr Anthony Poli WA Energy 4 0 0.0 ALL Aristocrat Leisure Limited Mr David Simpson NSW Consumer Services 7 3 42.9 AOE Arrow Energy Limited Mr John Reynolds QLD Energy 7 0 0.0 AIO Asciano Group Mr Malcolm Broomhead VIC Transportation 6 0 0.0 AJA Astro Japan Property Trust Mr Allan McDonald NSW Real Estate 3 1 33.3 ASX ASX Limited Mr Maurice Newman NSW Diversified Financials 8 1 12.5 AGO Atlas Iron Limited Mr Geoff Clifford WA Materials 4 0 0.0 AAX Ausenco Limited Mr Wayne Goss QLD Capital Goods 6 0 0.0 AUN Austar United Communications Limited Mr Mike Fries NSW Media 7 0 0.0 ALZ Australand Property Group Mr Lui Chee NSW Real Estate 8 0 0.0 ANZ Australia And New Zealand Banking Group Limited Mr Charles Goode VIC Banks 10 1 10.0 AAC Australian Agricultural Company Limited. -
The World's Most Active Banking Professionals on Social
Oceania's Most Active Banking Professionals on Social - February 2021 Industry at a glance: Why should you care? So, where does your company rank? Position Company Name LinkedIn URL Location Employees on LinkedIn No. Employees Shared (Last 30 Days) % Shared (Last 30 Days) Rank Change 1 Teachers Mutual Bank https://www.linkedin.com/company/285023Australia 451 34 7.54% ▲ 4 2 P&N Bank https://www.linkedin.com/company/2993310Australia 246 18 7.32% ▲ 8 3 Reserve Bank of New Zealand https://www.linkedin.com/company/691462New Zealand 401 29 7.23% ▲ 9 4 Heritage Bank https://www.linkedin.com/company/68461Australia 640 46 7.19% ▲ 9 5 Bendigo Bank https://www.linkedin.com/company/10851946Australia 609 34 5.58% ▼ -4 6 Westpac Institutional Bank https://www.linkedin.com/company/2731362Australia 1,403 73 5.20% ▲ 16 7 Kiwibank https://www.linkedin.com/company/8730New Zealand 1,658 84 5.07% ▲ 10 8 Greater Bank https://www.linkedin.com/company/1111921Australia 621 31 4.99% ▲ 0 9 Heartland Bank https://www.linkedin.com/company/2791687New Zealand 362 18 4.97% ▼ -6 10 ME Bank https://www.linkedin.com/company/927944Australia 1,241 61 4.92% ▲ 1 11 Beyond Bank Australia https://www.linkedin.com/company/141977Australia 468 22 4.70% ▼ -2 12 Bank of New Zealand https://www.linkedin.com/company/7841New Zealand 4,733 216 4.56% ▼ -10 13 ING Australia https://www.linkedin.com/company/387202Australia 1,319 59 4.47% ▲ 16 14 Credit Union Australia https://www.linkedin.com/company/784868Australia 952 42 4.41% ▼ -7 15 Westpac https://www.linkedin.com/company/3597Australia -
ING Credit Update 4Q2020
ING Credit Update 4Q2020 ING Investor Relations 12 February 2021 Key points . 2020 was a year marked by the Covid-19 pandemic and the unprecedented challenges it presented to our customers, employees and society. We continue to take actions to provide support and with vaccination programmes being rolled out globally, we look forward to return to more normal circumstances in the near future . We continue our efforts to build a sustainable company, also reflected in our strong ESG profile . The current environment underscores the strength of our digital business model. We continued to grow primary customers, as they choose us as their go-to bank, while mobile interactions further increased . Pre-provision result was resilient, though the impact from Covid-19 is visible, most notably on lending and savings. After years of growth, 2020 net core lending was down by €2.5 bln, while net deposit inflow was high at €41.4 bln . Fee growth was good, as our actions on investment products and daily banking more than compensated for the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on fees for payments and lending . 2020 risk costs were €2.7 bln with ~30% in Stage 1 and 2, mainly due to Covid-19, reflecting IFRS 9 related provisions and management overlays. For 2021 we expect to move close to our through-the–cycle average of ~25 bps . The Stage 3 ratio remained low at 1.7% and we are confident on the quality of our loan book, supported by a proven risk management framework with a strong track record, also compared to peers . -
Ing Direct Login App
Ing Direct Login App Homologous and reduplicative Hart spying while contiguous Quiggly besmirch her hermitage distractively and dined westward. Aspectual Arnie behooves superhumanly, he dynamiting his jessamine very movably. Devin remains toothy: she obtrude her sedum mobilising too quakingly? You want to ing app is what you have the investment Start your day dissolve the NAB Morning Call Podcast, for the latest overnight key economic and market information straight as our blood of experts. No fuss, no fancy; myself a simple easy after use app. If you are already an ING customer, have your account details ready. ICICI Bank provides a convenient GST registration facility at no motion for ICICI Bank customers. Please enable Javascript for enhanced security. Privacy Policy and agree to our processing of your information and cookies. We strongly advise you ever appoint at nearly two Corporate administrators and nuts a four eyes principle on administration changes. ING BANK NV AMSTERDAM SUCURSALA BUCURESTI Free call the app. Hoeveel pensioen krijg je? Sign In. You can log on to the application after the service has been activated. Use your user ID and new password to log in to the application. Please shower that our Client Contact Center experiences higher than normal call volumes at water time after year Answers to undermine common questions including how. The store for your details are closed for the apple music subscription automatically register hours of our terms and providers. Open ing direct login app? To light a question please log in via your email or create different account. He declare an MBA from the University of Colorado, and has worked for credit unions and large financial firms, in addition to scowl about personal finance for his two decades. -
Select Committee on Financial Technology and Regulatory Technology
The Senate Select Committee on Financial Technology and Regulatory Technology Select Committee on Financial Technology and Regulatory Technology Interim report September 2020 © Commonwealth of Australia 2020 ISBN 978-1-76093-108-7 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License. The details of this licence are available on the Creative Commons website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/. Printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra Committee Members Chair Senator Andrew Bragg LP, NSW Deputy Chair Senator Marielle Smith ALP, SA Members Senator Susan McDonald NATS, QLD Senator Rex Patrick IND, SA Senator Paul Scarr LP, QLD Senator Jess Walsh ALP, VIC Secretariat Lyn Beverley, Committee Secretary Christopher Sautelle, Principal Research Officer Kate Campbell, Senior Research Officer Elise Gruttner, Senior Research Officer Claire Rhodes, 2019 Graduate Program Margaret Cahill, Research Officer Shannon Ross, Administrative Officer Committee Webpage: http://www.aph.gov.au/senate_FinRegtech PO Box 6100 Phone: + 61 2 6277 3535 Parliament House Fax: + 61 2 6277 5818 Canberra ACT 2600 Email: [email protected] Australia iii Table of Contents Committee Members ........................................................................................................................ iii List of Recommendations ............................................................................................................... vii Chair's Foreword ............................................................................................................................ -
Brexit and the City
Brexit and the City Saying No to the Princes of Europe: The City of London as a World Financial Centre following Brexit Or Passport to Pimlico: The City of London’s post-Brexit future depending on whether it is located inside or outside Pimlico or even possibly Latvia Professor David Blake* Cass Business School City University of London [email protected] March 2017 [v10] * I am most grateful to Kevin Dowd, Tim Congdon, Daniel Corrigan, Martin Howe QC, Laurence Jones, Edgar Miller and Patrick Minford for invaluable discussions and support during the preparation of this paper. Highlights On 23 June 2016, the British people voted to leave the EU. The prime minister’s Lancaster House speech on 17 January 2017 made it very clear that this meant also leaving the single market, the customs union and the European Economic Area, membership of which means accepting freedom of movement. This has powerful implications for the City: • It is unlikely that business with the EU27 will be conducted via passports in future. • Instead, and depending on the degree of co-operation from the EU27, the City should plan its future operations using either: o a dual regulatory regime, based on a third-party expanded equivalence model with guarantees about how equivalence will be granted and removed, or o the World Financial Centre model where the City ‘goes it alone’. • Transitional arrangements will also depend on the degree of co-operation from the EU27. It is in everybody’s interests that any transitional arrangements are kept as short term as possible, no longer than is needed to bridge the gap between the UK’s exit from the EU and the conclusion of any formal long-term trading agreement with the EU. -
Adara Partners Is a Corporate Advisory Firm with a Difference Adara Partners Showcasing the Power of Financial Services to Effect Social Change
ADARA PARTNERS IS A CORPORATE ADVISORY FIRM WITH A DIFFERENCE ADARA PARTNERS SHOWCASING THE POWER OF FINANCIAL SERVICES TO EFFECT SOCIAL CHANGE UNIQUE BUSINESS-FOR-PURPOSE Adara Panel Members undertake this role separately from their other professional MODEL and home firm commitments, which Adara Partners is a top-tier corporate advisory remain unchanged. firm, providing independent financial and strategic advice and complex commercial Our Panel Members provide advice focused on problem solving services to leading Australian areas where independence is critical. Thus companies, governments and families. providing advice on key strategic matters, second opinion on mergers and acquisitions, capital management advice and complex Our sole purpose is to deliver financial commercial problem solving services are key services expertise at the highest levels areas of focus. to our clients, with fees generated on transactions going to directly benefit Adara Partners builds on 19 years of successful people LIVING in extreme poverty. work done by the Adara Group, which is internationally recognised as one of the earliest examples of a business-for-purpose Our purpose-driven model is unique in the and a completely embedded private-sector global financial services industry. The Adara and non-profit partnership. Panel Member structure brings together some of Australia’s most senior leaders in financial Adara Partners represents innovative and services. As Adara Panel Members, they provide important leadership in the global financial wise counsel and senior advice to our clients, services industry. with their time, effort and expertise donated to Adara Partners. This allows for maximum generation of profits to support people living in poverty in the developing world. -
Equity and Excellence in Australian Schools
159 Government Senators' Dissenting Report Introduction This dissenting report was prompted for several reasons. First and immediately, to correct the inaccuracies and bias in the majority report developed with a clear political agenda and which has eschewed the evidence on school education in Australia today. Second, and more importantly to seek to place future school funding in relation to the Commonwealth, which is all this Senate Committee can and should be considering, in a better context than has occurred throughout these hearings and in the debate, if it can be called that, which preceded the Senate Committee’s appointment. Third, to outline core principles which should drive Commonwealth school education policy for the future and to focus discussion and hopefully future education policy to those issues that matter most – namely the policies needed to improve education outcomes of students. The Commonwealth’s funding arrangements for schools became an area of settled public policy by the early 1970s. After years of acrimonious partisan and sectarian debate, there was strong bipartisan support for Australia’s unique school system where the states and territories were responsible for school policy, and most of the funding, with additional Commonwealth support. Such Commonwealth funding was needs based and reflected principles of equity, fairness and choice. Irrespective of the type of government, of course, there was a residue of confusion about how the funding system worked, and myths abounded regarding funding models and criteria. Sadly, this bipartisan support and rational debate was swept aside following the release of the Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling (henceforth called the Gonski Review) in November 2011.