(Received 13 January, 1978) China Has a Long-Standing Algebraic Tradition. the Earliest Extant Chinese Mathematical Text Is

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(Received 13 January, 1978) China Has a Long-Standing Algebraic Tradition. the Earliest Extant Chinese Mathematical Text Is THE JADE MIRROR OF THE FOUR UNKNOWNS - SOME REFLECTIONS* J. Hoe (received 13 January, 1978) China has a long-standing algebraic tradition. The earliest extant Chinese mathematical text isZhoubt the suanjrng ~ The arithmetical classic of the gnomon and the circular paths of heaven, thought to be of the Han period (206BC to 220AD), but almost certainly containing material dating back some thousand years. Although primarily a text on astronomy, it opens with a discussion of the theorem of Pythagoras, stated in essentially algebraic form. The second oldest extant mathematical text, also of the Han period,Jiiizhang the su&nshti - Nine chapters on the mathematical art, contains a chapter on the solution of systems of linear equations in up to five unknowns, using elementary column operations to reduce the matrix of coefficients to triangular form. Systems of indeterminate equation are also discussed, and the text contains the earliest known reference to negative numbers. The Chinese algebraic tradition reached its height in the latter part of the Song dynasty (960 to 1279AD) and the early part of the Yuan dynasty (1279 to 1368AD). The work of Zhu Shiji6 is the culmination of this tradition. Only two of Zhu Shijie's works are extant: 1. Suarucue qvmeng 'Jx„ - Introduction to mathematics, 1299AD; 2. Styuan yujian rS? Aj i ^ - The jade mirror of the four unknowns, 1303AD, * Invited address delivered at the Twelfth New Zealand Mathematics Colloquium, held at Wellington 9-12th May, 1977. Math. Chronicle 7(1978) 125-156. 125 Sarton ([1] Vol • III, p. 703) says of theS'Lyuan yu^j'ian "that it is "the most important Chinese book of its kind, and one of the outstanding mathematical books of mediaeval times". However, as late as 1968, Marco Adamo [2] affirms that Chinese mathematics is a collection of ideas copied from the Greeks and Indians. He states that the reasoning is carried out in the language of discourse, and that the meaning of Chinese mathematics is as incomprehensible as its ideas, methodology and applications are incomplete, and that only in arithmetic are there some rare signs of originality. Which of these opposing views should one accept? In order to be able to judge between these opinions, one needs to be able to look at concrete examples of the work done by Chinese mathematicians. Unfortunately, until recently, few translations of Chinese mathematical texts have been made, so that it has not been easy for mathematicians, who do not read Chinese, to do more than note the judgements made by others, while wondering at the wide divergence in the views expressed. The situation is now beginning to change. For instance, studies of two Song mathematical texts have recently been made: one by Libbrecht [3] on theShhshU jiZzhdng 1247 by Qin Jius'hao > and the other by Lam Lay Yong [4] on the Y&ng Em suctnfft of 1274/5 by Y£ng Hui . In this address, I wish however, to confine myself to some reflections on the work published in 1303 by Zhu Shijie, entitledThe jade mirror of the four unknowns [5], in the hope of giving you some idea of how Sarton and Adamo can have come to hold such opposite views. First, how true is Sarton’s viewThe that jade mirror of the four unknowns is the most important Chinese book of its kind and one of the outstanding mathematical books of mediaeval times. In order to answer this, we need to know what other books on mathematics existed in China and something of their content. We do indeed have some idea of what books existed ([6] pp 18-53), for the Chinese have kept fairly complete historical records, and the twenty-four official histories, compiled over a period of some 2000 years, contain, in addition to the usual material one would expect to find in official annals, extensive bibliographies, listing what were considered to be important works. For example, the bibliography of theHbn Shu - History of the Han dynasty3 covering the period from 206BC to 9AD, lists 21 titles on astronomy and 18 on the calendar, of which 2 are specifically on mathematics ([7] pp 1763-1766). The bibliography of theSui ShU fi| - History of the Sui dynasty, which lasted from 581 to 618AD, lists 97 titles on astronomy and ICO on the calendar of which 27 deal with mathematics ([8] pp 1017-1026). For the Tang dynasty (618 to 907AD), there are two official histories. In Jitithe Tdng Shu - Old history of the Tang dynasty, 19 works on mathematics are listed in the bibliography ([9] pp 2036-1039), whereas theXZn Tdng ShU - New history of the Tang dynasty lists 35 works of mathematics among the 75 calendrical works listed in the calendrical section ([10] pp 1543-1548; [ll] p 35). In 656AD, ten mathematical works were edited into a single collection for the use of aspiring officials preparing for the state examinations, but already, one of the important works, praised in Historythe of the Sui dynasty had been lost. This was a work on astronomical calculation known as Zhut Shu by a mathematician Zu ChongzhI who lived from 430 to 501AD, and who today is known largely for having calculated the value of it as lying between 3.1415926 and 3.1415927. He has been honoured today by having a crater on the moon named after him. The number of titles listed in these official bibliographies gives us some idea of the extent of mathematical activity up to the end of the Tang dynasty, and also of the importance accorded this type of activity. Unfortunately, we have almost no idea of what was contained in these books, apart from what survives today in the collection known as theSuanjZng shishu - The ten mathematical classics. These include the two Han texts already cited,Zhoubi the suanjing and the Jiuzhang suanshu. Even so, not all the texts in this collection 127 are complete. After the Tang dynasty, mathematical activity in China went into decline. But in 1084 AD, a printed edition of the ten mathematical classics appeared - again for the use of candidates for the state examinations. These were later copied into an encyclopaedia of all knowledge compiled in some 22,000 volumes during the fifteenth century, and known as theYdng L& dhdi&n fKjfc. Z L & - The Yong Le Encyclopaedia. 36 chapters in this encyclopaedia (Chapters 16 329 to 16 365) were devoted to mathematics. Unfortunately, only about a hundred chapters of the encyclopaedia survive today, of which only two of the chapters on mathematics (Chapters 16 343 and 16 344). These are kept in the Cambridge University Library ([6] p32). A number of bibliographies exist for the Song period. From these, Li Yan ([1l] pp 87-90) lists some 70 titles on mathematics. There also exists a bibliography entitled theSut Chu Tang Catalogue , compiled by Ydu M&o (1127-1194 AD). 95 titles are listed in the mathematical section ([6] p 40). Today, only eight works survive from the post- Tang period, or more specifically from the late Song - early Yuan period, by four mathematicians in all. They are: 1. Qin Jiushao Shushu jiuzhcng Mathematical treatise in nine sections, 1247 2. Li Ye Ceyuan haijing "SA if] & Sea mirror of circle measurements3 1248 Ylgu yandurn * -£ if New steps in computation, 1259 3. Y£ng Hul Xifingjie jiuzhang su&nfa Detailed analysis of the mathematical rules in the 'Nine chapters 1261 Riyong suanfa 0 ^ ^ Computing methods for daily use, 1262 Y6ng E va , su.hr.fa %% ^ 'Ju Yang Hui rs computing methods, 1274/5 4. Zhu Shijie Suanccue qzmeng 'jjf Introduction to mathematics, 1299 N ^ *s - Siyuan yujian \tT] Jl The jade mirror of the four unknowns, 1303 We see then, that Sarton was judgingThe jade mirror of the four unknowns in relation to the very small number of mathematical texts that survive today, and that we have no way of telling what was in the books that have been lost. We find ourselves in the position of trying to determine and assess the nature of Chinese mathematical activity from studying the handful of school text-books that survive. It is in this context that we must judge Adamo's view that Chinese mathematics shows little originality. One does not normally expect mathematical originality from a text-book.The ten mathematical classics were, as already mentioned, compiled for the use of students preparing for the civil service examinations, while the preface to the 1303 edition of The jade mirror of the four unknowns specifically praises Zhu Shijie for his teaching ability, and makes no claim for great originality. A text-book should, of course, be clear. If it is true then, that mathematical argument in Chinese was carried out in the language of discourse and that the meaning of Chinese mathematics is incomprehensible, as Adamo suggests, then these books will have failed in their primary aim. The idea that the texts are in the language of discourse, and that mathematical reasoning as we know it is not therefore possible, arises, I think, from a misunderstanding regarding the nature of the Chinese written language. This misunderstanding is still rather widespread today, and it has been argued that it is impossible for China today to assimilate the concepts of modern science because the language forces her to try to do so through the seventeenth century language of discourse ([l2] p 437). It has even been seriously suggested that the Chinese cannot hope to rival Europeans in science, 129 engineering or scholarship until they abandon their ideographs ([13] p 26). For example, I have heard it contended that it is impossible to express a term such as "electron microscope" in Chinese without saying each time the equivalent of "a system of lenses and mirrors for revealing the shape of infinitesimal things by the use of particles of electricity".
Recommended publications
  • Proquest Dissertations
    University of Alberta Qin Jiushao and His Mathematical Treatise in Nine Sections in Thirteenth-Century China by Ke-Xin Au Yong A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History History and Classics ©Ke-Xin Au Yong Fall 2011 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de ('edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-81281-5 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-81281-5 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats.
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Jeongha's Tianyuanshu and Zhengcheng Kaifangfa
    Journal for History of Mathematics http://dx.doi.org/10.14477/jhm.2014.27.3.155 Vol. 27 No. 3 (June 2014), 155–164 Hong JeongHa’s Tianyuanshu and Zhengcheng Kaifangfa 洪正夏의 天元術과 增乘開方法 Hong Sung Sa 홍성사 Hong Young Hee 홍영희 Kim Young Wook* 김영욱 Tianyuanshu and Zengcheng Kaifangfa introduced in the Song–Yuan dynasties and their contribution to the theory of equations are one of the most important achieve- ments in the history of Chinese mathematics. Furthermore, they became the most fundamental subject in the history of East Asian mathematics as well. The opera- tions, or the mathematical structure of polynomials have been overlooked by tra- ditional mathematics books. Investigation of GuIlJib (九一集) of Joseon mathemati- cian Hong JeongHa reveals thatQ Hong’s approach to polynomials is highly struc- n tural. For the expansion of k=1(x + ak), Hong invented a new method which we name Hong JeongHa’s synthetic expansion. Using this, he reveals that the pro- cesses in Zhengcheng Kaifangfa is not synthetic division but synthetic expansion. Keywords: Hong JeongHa, GuIlJib, Hong JeongHa’s synthetic expansion, Tianyuan- shu, Structure of polynomials, Binomial coefficients, Zhengcheng Kaifangfa, Shisuo Kaifangfa; 洪正夏, 九一集, 洪正夏의 組立展開, 天元術, 多項式의 構造, 二項係數, 增乘開 方法, 釋鎖開方法. MSC: 01A13, 01A25, 01A45, 01A50, 12–03, 12E05, 12E12 1 Introduction The theory of equations in Eastern mathematics has as long a history as that in the West and divides into two parts, namely constructing equations and solving them. For the former, Tianyuanshu (天元術) was introduced in the early period of the Song dynasty (960–1279) and then extended up to Siyuanshu (四元術) to repre- sent polynomials of four indeterminates by Zhu Shijie (朱世傑) in his Siyuan Yujian (四元玉鑑, 1303).
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Chinese Mathematical Arts on Seki Kowa
    THE INFLUENCE OF CHINESE MATHEMATICAL ARTS ON SEKI KOWA b y SHIGERU JOCHI, M.A. (Tokai) Thesis submitted for the degree of Ph.D. School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. 1 9 9 3 ProQuest Number: 10673061 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10673061 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ABSTRACT I will consider the influence of Chinese mathematics on Seki Kowa. For this purpose, my thesis is constructed in four parts, introduction, I the studies of editions; Shu Shn Jin Zhang and Yang Uni S u m Fa, II the conception and extension of method for making magic squares, and 1 the analysis for solving indeterminate equations. In the introduction, I will explain some similarities between Chinese mathematics in the Song dynasty and Seki Kowa's works. It will become clear that the latter was influenced by Chinese mathematics. Then I introduce some former opinions concerning which Chinese mathematical book influenced him. I shall show that two Chinese mathematical books, Shn Shn Jin Zhang and Yang Hni S u m Fa, are particularly important.
    [Show full text]
  • On Mathematical Symbols in China* by Fang Li and Yong Zhang†
    On Mathematical Symbols in China* by Fang Li and Yong Zhang† Abstract. When studying the history of mathemati- cal symbols, one finds that the development of mathematical symbols in China is a significant piece of Chinese history; however, between the beginning of mathematics and modern day mathematics in China, there exists a long blank period. Let us focus on the development of Chinese mathematical symbols, and find out the significance of their origin, evolution, rise and fall within Chinese mathematics. The Origin of the Mathematical Symbols Figure 1. The symbols for numerals are the earliest math- ematical symbols. Ancient civilizations in Babylonia, derived from the word “white” (ⱑ) which symbolizes Egypt and Rome, which each had distinct writing sys- the human’s head in hieroglyphics. Similarly, the Chi- tems, independently developed mathematical sym- nese word “ten thousand” (ϛ) in Oracle Bone Script bols. Naturally, China did not fall behind. In the 16th was derived from the symbol for scorpion, possibly century BC, symbols for numerals, called Shang Or- because it is a creature found throughout rocks “in acle Numerals because they were used in the Oracle the thousands”. In Oracle Script, the multiples of ten, Bone Script, appeared in China as a set of thirteen hundred, thousand and ten thousand can be denoted numbers, seen below. (The original can be found in in two ways: one is called co-digital or co-text, which reference [2].) combines two single figures; another one is called Oracle Bone Script is a branch of hieroglyphics. analysis-word or a sub-word, which uses two sepa- In Figure 1, it is obvious that 1 to 4 are the hiero- rate symbols to represent a single meaning (see [5]).
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematics Education in East Asia from Antiquity to Modern Times
    Mathematics education in East Asia from antiquity to modern times Man Keung SIU Department of Mathematics, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China Abstract Since the early 1990s the learning process of Asian students brought up in the tradition of the Confucian heritage culture (CHC) has become a much discussed issue. As a consequence the teaching process of Asian teachers in CHC classrooms has attracted the same attention. These two related issues are brought into focus in the so-called “CHC Learner / Teacher Paradox”. It is therefore natural to look at the history of mathematics education in some Asian countries such as China, Japan and Korea. This paper attempts to give an account of this long episode from ancient to medieval to modern times with illustrative examples. Introduction In this paper the author attempts to discuss some aspects of mathematics education in East Asia from antiquity to modern times by addressing the following questions. (i) What were the main features of mathematics education in (ancient) China / East Asia? (ii) What were some factors that led to such features? (iii) What influence did such features exert upon the development of mathematics in (ancient) China / East Asia? (iv) What lesson in mathematics education do we learn from this study? The last question is of particular interest in view of the upsurge in the recent decade of the attention paid to the process of learning and teaching in a classroom environment dominated by the so-called Confucian heritage culture1 (CHC) [see (Stevenson & Stigler, 1992; Stigler & Hiebert, 1999; Watkins et al, 1996; 2001)].
    [Show full text]
  • The Frederick Mccormick Korean Collection This Inventory Is Created Based on the Following Two Sources
    The Frederick McCormick Korean Collection This inventory is created based on the following two sources. The numeric numbers follow the list numbers in Judith Boltz’ 1986 inventory. 1. 1986 inventory of the McCormick collection, by Judith Boltz. 2. Frederick McCormick Collection in the Special Collections in the Claremont Colleges Library, the Overseas Korean Cultural Heritage Foundation, 2015. I. CHINESE CLASSICS, EDITIONS AND STUDIES A: THE BOOK OF HISTORY 1. (NLK Catalog #: 1) 서전대전 | Sŏjŏn taejŏn | 書傳大全 Complete Commentaries on the Book of History 1820, 10 vols., Woodblock Part of Complete Collection of the Five Classics (五經大全) complied by Hu Guang at the order of Emperor Yongle (永樂, r. 1402-1424) of China’s Ming Dynasty. This is a collection of scholastic discourses based on Collected Commentaries on the Book of History compiled by Cai Shen. (蔡沈, 1167-1230) 2. (NLK Catalog #: 2) 서전언해 | Sŏjŏn ŏnhae | 書傳諺解 Commentary on the Book of History 1820, 5 vols., Woodblock A vernacular translation of the Book of History (書經) that provides pronunciations and syntax in Korean throughout the original Chinese text. This is part of Vernacular Translations of Four Books and Three Classics (書經諺解) published by the order of King Seonjo (宣祖) of Joseon. B. THE BOOK OF ODES 3. (NLK Catalog #: 3) 시전대전 | Sijŏn taejŏn | 詩傳大全 Complete Commentaries on the Book of odes 1820, 10 vols., Woodblock Part of Complete Collection of the Five Classics (五經大全) that complies commentaries based on Collected Commentaries on the Book of Odes (詩集傳) published by Zhu Xi (朱熹, 1130-1200) of China’s Song Dynasty. 4. (NLK Catalog #: 4) 시경언해 | Sigyŏng ŏnhae | 詩經諺解 Commentary on the Book of Odes 1820, 7 vols., Woodblock A vernacular translation of the Book of Odes (詩經) that provides pronunciation and syntax in Korean throughout the original Chinese text.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Chinese Mathematics (A Very Short Summary)
    Ancient Chinese Mathematics (a very short summary) • Documented civilization in China from c.3000 BCE. Un- til c.200 CE, ‘China’ refers to roughly to the area shown in the map: north of the Yangtze and around the Yellow rivers. • Earliest known method of enumeration dates from the Shang dynasty (c.1600–1046 BCE) commensurate with the earliest known oracle bone script for Chinese char- acters. Most information on the Shang dynsaty comes from commentaries by later scholars, though many orig- inal oracle bones have been excavated, particularly from Anyang, its capital. • During the Zhou dynasty (c.1046–256 BCE) and especially towards the end in the Warring States period (c.475–221 BCE) a number of mathematical texts were written. Most have been lost but much content can be ascertained from later commentaries. • The warring states period is an excellent example of the idea that wars lead to progress. Rapid change created pressure for new systems of thought and technology. Feudal lords employed itinerant philosophers1) The use of iron in China expanded enormously, leading to major changes in warfare2 and commerce, both of which created an increased need for mathematics. Indeed the astronomy, the calendar and trade were the dominant drivers of Chinese mathematics for many centuries. • The warring states period ended in 221 BCE with the victory of victory of the Qin Emperor Shi Huang Di: famous for commanding that books be burned, rebuilding the great walls and for being buried with the Terracotta Army in Xi’an. China was subsequently ruled by a succession of dynasties until the abolition of the monarchy in 1912.
    [Show full text]
  • One Quadratic Equation, Different Understandings: the 13Th Century Interpretations by Li Ye and Later Commentaries in the 18Th and 19Th Centuries
    Journal for History of Mathematics http://dx.doi.org/10.14477/jhm.2017.30.3.137 Vol. 30 No. 3 (Jun. 2017), 137–162 One Quadratic Equation, Different Understandings: the 13th Century Interpretations by Li Ye and Later Commentaries in the 18th and 19th Centuries Charlotte Pollet Ying Jia-Ming* The Chinese algebraic method, the tian yuan shu, was developed during Song pe- riod (960–1279), of which Li Ye’s works contain the earliest testimony. Two 18th century editors commentated on his works: the editor of the Siku quanshu and Li Rui, the latter responding to the former. Korean scholar Nam Byeong-gil added an- other response in 1855. Differences can be found in the way these commentators considered mathematical objects and procedures. The conflicting nature of these commentaries shows that the same object, the quadratic equation, can beget differ- ent interpretations, either a procedure or an assertion of equality. Textual elements in this paper help modern readers reconstruct different authors’ understandings and reconsider the evolution of the definition of the object we now call ‘equation’. Keywords: algebra, quadratic equation, Song China, Qing China, Joseon Korea MSC: 01A13, 01A25, 01A35, 01A50, 01A55, 12–03 1 Introduction It is well-known to sinologists that our present knowledge of Song dynasty (960– 1279) mathematics derives from reconstructions made by Qing dynasty editors [24]. This time period is known for its evidential studies particularly in the fields of philol- ogy, phonology and exegesis, and for the editions of Classics in order to republish ancient Chinese texts. Some editors, convinced of the Chinese origin of algebra, used philological techniques to recover lost materials and restore the roots of ‘Chi- nese mathematics’ [15, 30].
    [Show full text]
  • KUIL, Vol. 26, 2003, 429-474 the HISTORY of CHINESE
    KUIL, vol. 26, 2003, 429-474 THE HISTORY OF CHINESE MATHEMATICS: THE PAST 25 YEARS ANDREA EBERHARD-BRÉARD REHSEIS (CNRS), France • Ph. D. Program in History • The Graduate Center, CUNY JOSEPH W. DAUBEN Ph. D. Program in History • The Graduate Center, CUNY XU YIBAO Ph.D. Program in History • The Graduate Center, CUNY RESUMEN ABSTRACT El presente artículo presenta los más This paper presents the major accom- importantes logros de la investigacián plishments of research over the past quar- sobre historia de las matemáticas chinas en ter century in the field of Chinese mathe- el ŭltimo cuarto del siglo XX. Comienza matics and its history. We begin with a con una breve panordmica sobre el estado brief overview of the progress of our de conocimientos y las principales figuras knowledge of that history, and the major que realizaron las prirneras contribuciones figures who contributed the fundamental fundamentales antes de 1975 para después early works prior to 1975, and then exam- examinar más detenidamente las aporta- ine more carefully the achievements of the ciones Ilevadas a cabo durante el ŭltimo past quarter century, beginning with a cuarto de siglo: autores europeos, publica- general overview of the subject before ciones en inglés y, finalmente, la extraor- surveying in more detail the contributions dinaria produccián en chino, en su mayor made in the past twenty-five years, first parte tras la Revolución Cultural. by Europeans, then by scholars publishing in English, after which this survey turns to examine the extraordinary production of scholarship written in Chinese, most of it since the end of the Cultural Revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of the Duoji Method and Its Development
    EASTM 20 (2003): 45-72 The Westernization of Chinese Mathematics: A Case Study of the duoji Method and its Development Tian Miao /Tian Miao is Associate Professor of History of Science at the Institute for the History of Natural Sciences, Chinese Academy of Science. Her research covers the history of mathematics in seventeenth- to nineteenth-century China. Recent publications include "Qingmo shuxue jiaoyu dui Zhongguo shuxue zhiyehua de yinxiang" m5K Wl + #1!.. ~ 31:1 c:p 00 Wl + ~R ~ 1t El~ :irJ Ufa] (The Impact of the Development of Mathematics Education on the Professionalization of Chi­ nese Mathematicians in Late Qing China) (Ziran kex.ueshi yanjiu El ~ 'f4 + _§e_ jiff ~ (Studies in the History of Natural Sciences), /998), "Qingmo shuxue jiaoshi de goucheng de tedian" m5K Wl + #1!.. jffi ITT ,tt] fflG ~ ,9- (A Study on 1he Formation of Mathematical Teachers in the Late Qing Dynasty) (Zhongguo keji shiliao c:p 00 N t:5Z _§e_ fl (Historical Materials of Science and Technology), 1998), "Jiegenfang, Tian yuan and Daishu: Algebra in Qing China" (Historia Scientiarum, /999), "Siyuan yujian de Qingdai banben Ji Jialing sicao de jiao­ /.:an yanjiu" iz:g 5t .=E ~ ITT mft fJ§_ * Ez ® 1;- iz:g "J/i- ITT ~ WI iiff Ji: (Textual Criticism Research on the Different Versions of the Siyuan Yujian and the /'roof~ for the Jialing sicao during the Qing Dynasty) (Ziran kexueshi yanjiu, /999).J * * * The duoji ±~ fl (lit., "summing piles") method of calculating the sum of a given pile is a major subject in traditional Chinese mathematics. After the sixteenth n.:ntury, Chinese mathematics failed to keep pace with Western mathematics, but Ilic duoji method is one in which the late Qing mathematicians made advances over their Western colleagues.
    [Show full text]
  • Zhu Shijie and “Pascal's” Triangle
    Zhu Shijie and “Pascal’s” Triangle Gerry Moerkerken Figure 1: Image showing Pascal’s Triangle as a fractal (self-created) Historical Background and Context Zhu Shijie ( 朱世杰 ; 1249–1314) was born near present day Beijing. He is known for unifying the mathematics of the Chinese northern and southern traditions. Two of his works were highly influential. The first, released in 1299 was Introduction to Mathematical Science, which played a role in a calculation method further develop by the Japanese. The second was The Precious Mirror and the Four Elements released in 1303.13 The book itself tells us that Zhu was a teacher for 20 years travelling “over seas and lakes” throughout China and “the number who came to be taught by him increased each day”.8 Zhu Shijie lived during a troubled time in Chinese history. For the first time the entire empire was ruled by a foreign power: Khublai Khan. The Yuan dynasty was declared by the Mongolian khan in 1271, but the conquest was not completed until 1279. Khublai was a promoter of Science, Maths, and Architecture. This can be seen by the capital building designed by the khan near present day Beijing. Despite the hatred of the Chinese towards the Mongols, the economy seemed to flourish during this time, as was written about by the Venetian, Marco Polo, and Korean, Ch’oe Pu.1 The history of mathematics in China is difficult to unravel. Straffin writes that mathematicians did not receive the same social status as humanities scholars, which may have attributed to the large gap between the work of Lui Hui in the 3rd century and the work produced by 13th century mathematicians such as Zhu.10 Martzloff adds to this that little is known of Chinese mathematicians and it is often difficult to define who the mathematicians were.8 The Chinese at the time of Zhu Shijie used counting rods.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nine Chapters on the History of Chinese Mathematics
    The Nine Chapters on the History of Chinese Mathematics Rik Brandenburg¤ Keimpe Nevenzeely 15 July 2007 Abstract This article explores Chinese mathematics from the ¯rst archeological evidence of numbers on oracle bones (14th century BC) to the time Chi- nese mathematics became a part universal mathematics (halfway the 19th century AD). First a concise overview of Chinese history and in philosophy is given. The ethical oriented Confucianism was the dominant philosophy and con- sequently little attention was given to the natural world, hindering the development of natural sciences and mathematics. Due to historical and philosophical reasons, Chinese mathematics took quite a di®erent path than its Western counterpart: Chinese mathematics was focused on alge- bra and practical applications instead of geometry and theoretical reason- ing. The Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art (ca. 1st century AD) is by far the most influential work: it would shape Chinese mathematics for centuries to come. Between the 3rd and the 11th century AD, Bud- dhist and Indian ideas got a ¯rm grip on China, yet curiously Chinese mathematics is barely influenced. In the `Chinese Renaissance' and the subsequent Mongol occupation between the 12th and 14th century Chinese mathematics will reach its zenith. In the 15th and 16th centuries mathematical development waned and important achievements were forgotten. Only after the arrival of Eu- ropean missionary-scientists at the end of the 16th and during the 17th century mathematics made progress again. The Opium Wars of the 19th century mark the end of the classical China and the indigenous Chinese mathematics would be assimilated by universal mathematics.
    [Show full text]