DOCSLIB.ORG

Paleontological Resources March 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Paleontological Resources March 2018 United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests REVISED DRAFT Forest Assessments: Paleontological Resources March 2018 Paleontologist Jim Jensen (Brigham Young University) working on large sauropod dinosaur forelimb replica (Supersaurus) excavated from Dry Mesa dinosaur quarry, Uncompahgre National Forest. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected] (link sends e-mail). USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests REVISED DRAFT Forest Plan Assessments: Paleontological Resources Contents Contents ........................................................................................................................................................ i Chapter 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 Key Issues for Paleontological Resources on the GMUG ......................................................................... 1 Summary Public Input ............................................................................................................................... 1 Use of Best Available Science .................................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 2. Condition and Trends .............................................................................................................. 2 Current Condition of Known Paleontological Sites/Localities.................................................................... 2 Information Gap regarding Paleontological Resources ......................................................................... 2 Chapter 3. Sustainability ............................................................................................................................ 7 Environmental Sustainability of Paleontological Resources ..................................................................... 7 Economic Sustainability of Paleontological Resources ............................................................................. 7 Social Sustainability of Paleontological Resources ................................................................................... 7 Chapter 4. Current Forest Plan and its Context ....................................................................................... 8 Existing Forest Plan Management Direction for Paleontological Resources ............................................ 8 Chapter 5. Potential Need for Plan Changes to Respond to Paleontological Resource Issues ......... 8 References Cited ......................................................................................................................................... 9 Appendix A. Paleontological Resources Rapid Assessment System ................................................. 12 PRRAS value 0 ........................................................................................................................................ 13 PRRAS value 1 ........................................................................................................................................ 14 PRRAS value 2 ........................................................................................................................................ 14 Relation of FYPC Values to New Categorization System ....................................................................... 14 PRASS Categorization and Paleontological Resource Management ..................................................... 15 List of Tables Table 1. Paleontological Resource Rapid Assessment System values for GMUG National Forest ............................. 17 List of Figures Figure 1. Paleontological Resources Rapid Assessment System map for the GMUG National Forest........................ 16 i Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests REVISED DRAFT Forest Plan Assessments: Paleontological Resources Chapter 1. Introduction Key Issues for Paleontological Resources on the GMUG A fundamental paleontological resources analysis for the Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests (GMUG) has never been completed, such as the Comprehensive Evaluation Reports completed for other resources areas in 2006. Therefore, a base-level understanding of what paleontological localities/sites are known on the GMUG is necessary, as well as predictive potential maps to know the likelihood of encountering significant paleontological resources during ground disturbance. With the exception of one Special Interest Area (Dry Mesa Dinosaur Quarry on the Uncompahgre Plateau), there is no strategic direction for management of the paleontological resources on the GMUG. Summary Public Input The public is immensely interested in paleontological resources, and the Rocky Mountain Regional Office’s Paleontological Program has an extensive history of providing ‘Cultural Services’ (2012 planning rule, 1909.12, chapter 10, section 13.12 Ecosystem Services) to the country through volunteer stewardship projects. The only site the public (and perhaps many internally) are aware of is the “Dry Mesa Dinosaur Quarry.” Dry Mesa is a highly significant locality managed on the Forest, but Dry Mesa is not an active fossil quarry at present, and emphasis is now on management of extensive collections in partner museums (largely Brigham Young University). However, there are many more paleontological resources on the GMUG, many undiscovered, including vertebrate trackways, plant, and invertebrate fossils, as well as fossil mammals. There is substantial public input/interest in volunteering to provide responsible management of these resources. Recent inquiry (2015) from the public (Colorado Springs Mineralogical Society) about opportunities for “casual collecting” (fossils) and rock-hounding (rocks and minerals) on surrounding forests (Rio Grande and San Juan) has revealed inaccurate information on some Forest Service interpretive panels. These panels should be updated to reflect current Rules (36 CFR 291, April 17, 2015) under current Law (PRPA, Paleontological Resources Preservation Act, 2009), and the potential presence of such inconsistencies should be reviewed on GMUG interpretive information (panels, brochures, internet). Use of Best Available Science Numerous peer-reviewed geological/paleontological publications have been drawn upon to develop an initial, and quickly hewn, predictive modeling system for the occurrence of paleontological resources on the GMUG. Historical ‘soft policy’ referred to this system as the Fossil Yield Potential Classification (FYPC). New policy in the Paleontological Program, in progress, has revamped the FYPC, and in its place developed the Paleontological Resources Rapid Assessment System (PRRAS) for short (Appendix I, Figure 1, Table 1). This system is simpler to understand and implement than previous ‘soft policy.’ 1 USDA Forest Service Much of the base geologic information comes from the State Geologic Map of Colorado in Arc/Info Format (Tweto, 1979; Green, 1992). Geologic units (Group, Formation, Member, subunits) are treated as delineated on the Tweto (1979) map. PRRAS values (0, 1, 2) are assigned by the regional paleontologist based upon literature review, consultation with partner universities and museums, communication with researchers in various applicable geologic strata, and ground reconnaissance. The use of Best Available Science herein follows the Executive Memorandum issued by President Barak Obama (March 9, 2009) regarding scientific integrity. Chapter 2. Condition and Trends Current Condition of Known Paleontological Sites/Localities Historically, relatively little attention has been devoted to paleontological
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 7 Great Pottery Projects
    ceramic artsdaily.org 7 great pottery projects | Second Edition | tips on making complex pottery forms using basic throwing and handbuilding skills This special report is brought to you with the support of Atlantic Pottery Supply Inc. 7 Great Pottery Projects Tips on Making Complex Pottery Forms Using Basic Throwing and Handbuilding Skills There’s nothing more fun than putting your hands in clay, but when you get into the studio do you know what you want to make? With clay, there are so many projects to do, it’s hard to focus on which ones to do first. So, for those who may wany some step-by-step direction, here are 7 great pottery projects you can take on. The projects selected here are easy even though some may look complicated. But with our easy-to-follow format, you’ll be able to duplicate what some of these talented potters have described. These projects can be made with almost any type of ceramic clay and fired at the recommended temperature for that clay. You can also decorate the surfaces of these projects in any style you choose—just be sure to use food-safe glazes for any pots that will be used for food. Need some variation? Just combine different ideas with those of your own and create all- new projects. With the pottery techniques in this book, there are enough possibilities to last a lifetime! The Stilted Bucket Covered Jar Set by Jake Allee by Steve Davis-Rosenbaum As a college ceramics instructor, Jake enjoys a good The next time you make jars, why not make two and time just like anybody else and it shows with this bucket connect them.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue River Valley Stratigraphic Chart
    Blue River Valley Hydrogeologic Geologic Period Phase Stratigraphic Unit Unit Modern Alluvium and outwash deposits Alluvial Aquifer Quaternary Glacial deposits Glacial deposits Glaciation Older stream and outwash terrace Local perched deposits aquifer Troublesome Formation Local aquifer Neogene Extension Volcanic rocks Volcanics Paleogene Transition Paleogene and Cretaceous intrusive Crystalline rocks bedrock Laramide Pierre Shale Smoky Hill Member Fort Hayes Limestone Pierre confining Niobrara Niobrara Formation Cretaceous unit Interior Carlile Shale Seaway Greenhorn Limestone Graneros Shale Benton Group Dakota Sandstone Dakota Aquifer Morrison Formation Morrison Aquifer Jurassic Mesozoic Entrada Sandstone Entrada Aquifer Sandstones Chinle confining Triassic Chinle Formation unit Permian Maroon Formation Ancestral Maroon-Minturn Rocky Aquifer Mountains Minturn Formation Pennsylvanian Mississippian No strata Devonian Chaffee Group Paleozoic Silurian Mississippian- Carbonates Cambrian Ordovician Manitou Formation carbonate aquifer Dotsero Formation and Cambrian Sawatch Sandstone Crystalline rocks of igneous and Crystalline Precambrian Precambrian metamorphic origin in mountainous bedrock region Table 12a-05-01. Blue River Valley stratigraphic chart. Blue River Valley Unit Thickness Hydrogeologic Geologic Period Phase Stratigraphic Unit Physical Characteristics Hydrologic Characteristics (ft) Unit Well to poorly-sorted, uncemented sands, silts and gravels along modern Modern Alluvium and outwash deposits >35 Alluvial Aquifer streams and
    [Show full text]
  • Color in Salt Glaze
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 8-1-1967 Color in salt glaze Daniel Lee Stevens Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Stevens, Daniel Lee, "Color in salt glaze" (1967). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 561. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.561 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Daniel Lee Stevens for the Master of Science in teaching in Cerami~s 'presented 0:0 August 7, 1967. Title: COLOR IN SALT GLAZE. , Abs tract approved: This thesis endeavors to bring a brief history of salt glaze to the reader, following i~s ge~esisin Germany to England and the American colonies and its continuation to the prese~t day. In order to conduct research on color in salt glaze~ a kiln had to be built for this purpose, meeting all the requirements 'that this tech- nique demands. Studies were ~ade on clay bodies to determine their throwing qualities as well as their ability to take a salt glaze. Finally, research was carried out 'in many serfes of tests studying the reactions of'various engobes and other coloring materials when ,fired in the salt glaze kiln. \ .' COLOR IN SALT GLAZE by Daniel Lee Stevens A THESIS submitted to .Portland State College, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Teaching August 1967 \ I PORTLAND STATE COL~EGE LIBRARY' .
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvanian Minturn Formation, Colorado, U.S.A
    Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2008, v. 78, 0–0 Research Articles DOI: 10.2110/jsr.2008.052 DEPOSITS FROM WAVE-INFLUENCED TURBIDITY CURRENTS: PENNSYLVANIAN MINTURN FORMATION, COLORADO, U.S.A. 1 2 2 3 2 M. P. LAMB, P. M. MYROW, C. LUKENS, K. HOUCK, AND J. STRAUSS 1Department of Earth & Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, U.S.A. 2Department of Geology, Colorado College, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80903, U.S.A. 3Department of Geography and Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, 80217-3363 U.S.A. e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Turbidity currents generated nearshore have been suggested to be the source of some sandy marine event beds, but in most cases the evidence is circumstantial. Such flows must commonly travel through a field of oscillatory flow caused by wind-generated waves; little is known, however, about the interactions between waves and turbidity currents. We explore these interactions through detailed process-oriented sedimentological analysis of sandstone event beds from the Pennsylvanian Minturn Formation in north-central Colorado, U.S.A. The Minturn Formation exhibits a complex stratigraphic architecture of fan-delta deposits that developed in association with high topographic relief in a tectonically active setting. An , 20–35-m- thick, unconformity-bounded unit of prodelta deposits consists of dark green shale and turbidite-like sandstone beds with tool marks produced by abundant plant debris. Some of the sandstone event beds, most abundant at distal localities, contain reverse- to-normal grading and sequences of sedimentary structures that indicate deposition from waxing to waning flows. In contrast, proximal deposits, in some cases less than a kilometer away, contain abundant beds with evidence for deposition by wave- dominated combined flows, including large-scale hummocky cross-stratification (HCS).
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Third Conference on Fossil Resources in the National Park Service
    ^^ ;&J Proceedings of the Third Conference on Fossil Resources in the National Park Service Rachel Benton and Ann Elder, Editors Natural Resources Report NPS/NRFOBU/NRR-94/14 °>%HIL M©^m United States Department of the Interior • National Park Service Rocky Mountain Region • Fossil Butte National Monument The National Park Service disseminates reports on high priority, current resource management information, with application for managers, through the Natural Resources Report Series. Technologies and resource management methods; how to resource management papers; popular articles through the yearly highlights report; proceedings on resource management workshops or conferences; and natural resources program recommendations and descriptions and resource action plans are also disseminated through this series. Documents in this series usually contain information of a preliminary nature and are prepared primarily for internal use within the National Park Service. This information is not intended for use in the open literature. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommenda- tion for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: Publications Coordinator National Park Service Natural Resources Publication Office P.O. Box 25287 (WASO-NRPO) Denver, CO 80225-0287 CfO Printed on Recycled Paper Proceedings of the Third Conference on Fossil Resources in the National Park Service 14-17 September 1992 Fossil Butte National Monument, Wyoming Editors: Rachel Benton
    [Show full text]
  • Clay Minerals Soils to Engineering Technology to Cat Litter
    Clay Minerals Soils to Engineering Technology to Cat Litter USC Mineralogy Geol 215a (Anderson) Clay Minerals Clay minerals likely are the most utilized minerals … not just as the soils that grow plants for foods and garment, but a great range of applications, including oil absorbants, iron casting, animal feeds, pottery, china, pharmaceuticals, drilling fluids, waste water treatment, food preparation, paint, and … yes, cat litter! Bentonite workings, WY Clay Minerals There are three main groups of clay minerals: Kaolinite - also includes dickite and nacrite; formed by the decomposition of orthoclase feldspar (e.g. in granite); kaolin is the principal constituent in china clay. Illite - also includes glauconite (a green clay sand) and are the commonest clay minerals; formed by the decomposition of some micas and feldspars; predominant in marine clays and shales. Smectites or montmorillonites - also includes bentonite and vermiculite; formed by the alteration of mafic igneous rocks rich in Ca and Mg; weak linkage by cations (e.g. Na+, Ca++) results in high swelling/shrinking potential Clay Minerals are Phyllosilicates All have layers of Si tetrahedra SEM view of clay and layers of Al, Fe, Mg octahedra, similar to gibbsite or brucite Clay Minerals The kaolinite clays are 1:1 phyllosilicates The montmorillonite and illite clays are 2:1 phyllosilicates 1:1 and 2:1 Clay Minerals Marine Clays Clays mostly form on land but are often transported to the oceans, covering vast regions. Kaolinite Al2Si2O5(OH)2 Kaolinite clays have long been used in the ceramic industry, especially in fine porcelains, because they can be easily molded, have a fine texture, and are white when fired.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Add Color to Your Ceramic Art
    ceramic artsdaily.org how to add color to your ceramic art a guide to using ceramic colorants, ceramic stains, and ceramic oxides www.ceramicartsdaily.org | Copyright © 2010, Ceramic Publications Company | How to Add Color to Your Ceramic Art | i How to Add Color to Your Ceramic Art A Guide to Using Ceramic Colorants, Ceramic Stains, and Ceramic Oxides Adding color to your ceramic art can be a tricky proposition. Unlike working with paints, what you put on your prize pot or sculpture can be very different from how it looks before and after firing. As a general rule, ceramic stains and ceramic pigments look pretty much the same before and after firing while ceramic oxides like iron oxide, cobalt oxide, and copper oxide as well as cobalt carbonate and copper carbonate all look very different. In this guide you’ll discover a little help to better understand what, how, and why ceramic colorants work in a glaze. Enjoy! The World of Ceramic Colorants by Robin Hopper The potter’s palette can be just as broad as the painter’s because there are so many ceramic colorants and combinations to choose from. By combining ceramic oxides, ceramic stains, and ceramic pigments in various proportions, you can get every color in the spectrum. The Many Faces of Iron Oxide by Dr. Carol Marians Glaze ingredients, the clay body, firing atmosphere, and even kiln-stacking techniques can all affect your firing results. Red iron oxide is one of the ceramic colorants that’s quite temperamental and affected by a lot of variables. From dark brown to unusual speckles, red iron oxide can offer a lot for a single ceramic colorant.
    [Show full text]
  • Ford Ceramic Arts Columbus, Ohio
    The Journal of the American Art Pottery Association, v.14, n. 2, p. 12-14, 1998. © American Art Pottery Association. http://www.aapa.info/Home/tabid/120/Default.aspx http://www.aapa.info/Journal/tabid/56/Default.aspx ISSN: 1098-8920 Ford Ceramic Arts Columbus, Ohio By James L. Murphy For about five years during the late 1930s, the combination of inventive and artistic talent pro- vided by Walter D. Ford (1906-1988) and Paul V. Bogatay (1905-1972), gave life to Ford Ceramic Arts, Inc., a small and little-known Columbus, Ohio, firm specializing in ceramic art and design. The venture, at least in the beginning, was intimately associated with Ohio State University (OSU), from which Ford graduated in 1930 with a degree in Ceramic Engineering, and where Bogatay began his tenure as an instructor of design in 1934. In fact, the first plant, begun in 1936, was actually located on the OSU campus, at 319 West Tenth Avenue, now the site of Ohio State University’s School of Nursing. There two periodic kilns produced “decorated pottery and dinnerware, molded porcelain cameos, and advertising specialties.” Ford was president and ceramic engineer; Norman M. Sullivan, secretary, treasurer, and purchasing agent; Bogatay, art director. Subsequently, the company moved to 4591 North High Street, and Ford's brother, Byron E., became vice-president. Walter, or “Flivver” Ford, as he had been known since high school, was interested primarily in the engineering aspects of the venture, and it was several of his processes for producing photographic images in relief or intaglio on ceramics that distinguished the products of the company.
    [Show full text]
  • Cenomanian Turonian Coniacian Santonian Campanian
    walteri aff. aff. spp. spp. imperfectus spp. (prisms) Chronostratigraphy Offshore Norway sp. 1 Geologic Time Scale 2012 Zonation (Gradstein et al., 1999, and this study) Allomorphina halli / pyriformis Sigmoilina antiqua Textularia Gavelinella intermeda gracillima Valvulineria Bulbobaculites problematicus Caudammina ovuloides Nuttallinella florealis Stensioeina granulata polonica Inoceramus Rzehakina minima Rzehakina epigona Fenestrella bellii Gaudryina filiformis Trochamminoides Haplophragmoides Gavelinella usakensis Caudammina ovula Coarse agglutinated spp. LCO dubia Tritaxia Plectorecurvoides alternans Reussella szajnochae Recurvoides Hippocrepina depressa Psammosphaera sphaerical radiolarians Ma Age/Stage Lingulogavelinella jarzevae elegans Lt NCF19 Maastrichtian volutus LCO 70 NCF18 E szajnochae dubia Lt 75 LCO of NCF17 Campanian Deep Water M Agglutinated 80 Foraminifera E bellii NCF16 Lt Inoceramus LCO NCF15 85 Santonian M E polonica NCF14 Lt Coniacian M E Marginotruncana NCF13 90 Lt Turonian M E Dicarinella NCF12 95 Lt brittonensis M NCF11 Cenomanian delrioensis LCO NCF10 E antiqua NCF9 100 Figure 2.8c. Stratigraphic ranges of Upper Cretaceous benthic foraminifera, and miscellaneous index taxa, oshore mid-Norway, with the foraminiferal zonation established in this study. s.l. Chronostratigraphy Offshore Norway Geologic Time Scale 2012 Zonation (Gradstein et al., 1999, and this study) Abathomphalus mayaroensis Pseudotextularia elegans Hedbergella planispira Hedbergella hoelzi Praeglobotruncana delrioensis Praeglobotruncana stephani
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 BLM Facts
    BLM Oregon & Washington Bureau of Land Management of Bureau U.S. Department of the Interior the Interior of U.S. Department Oregon & Washington Bureau of Land Management BLM/OR/WA/AE-10/074+1792 The Bureau of Land Management Welcomes You to Oregon & Washington! Oregon & Washington i Welcome n early 2010, President Obama announced America’s Great Outdoors initiative Ito conserve our cherished lands and encourage Americans to enjoy the outdoors. And in this I’m reminded of William Shakespeare’s quote, “One touch of nature makes the whole world kin.” Throughout my years of experience, this great notion still rings true. I can attest that Americans have grown closer by the simple virtue of spending time together in nature. And it is on this note that I am thrilled to present our 2009 edition of BLM Facts. Between 96 pages of photos, maps, and detailed facts, I’m very pleased to highlight the diversity of the BLM’s multiple use mission. We serve the public lands by accomplishing what is perhaps the most extensive range of duties by any one agency. BLM foresters use scientific methods to plan for a sustainable growth of trees which also provide a healthy environment while still affording Americans homes, offices, and jobs. Our recreation planners and interpretive specialists present inspirational educational events and breathtaking locations for Americans to visit and create long-lasting memories. Resource specialists care for our special areas protected under the National Landscape Conservation System. Scientists at the BLM complete crucial research using the most current data to ensure we maintain these lands for future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Cretaceous (Santonian-Campanian) Stratigraphy of the Northern Sacramento Valley, California
    Late Cretaceous (Santonian-Campanian) stratigraphy of the northern Sacramento Valley, California DcT^rf {Department of Geology, University of California at Davis, Davis, California 95616 rElbK L). WAKL) J ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS The Upper Cretaceous (Coniacian-lower Thick accumulations of Upper Cretaceous Strata of the Chico Formation dip gently to Campanian) Chico Formation of the north- sedimentary deposits are found on the western, the southwest. Sections were mejisured using eastern Sacramento Valley, California, includes northern, and eastern margins of the Great Val- either tape and compass or Jacob's staff. In some three newly defined members at the type local- ley of California (Fig. 1). The search for oil and areas, outcrop data were plotted on U.S. Geo- ity: (1) cobble conglomerate of the basal Pon- gas in northern California, as well as interest in logical Survey topographic quadrangles and derosa Way Member, (2) coarse-grained con- the processes of sedimentation in fore-arc re- stratigraphie columns were determined trigo- glomeratic sandstone of the overlying Musty gimes, has made the Great Valley seque nce, ex- nometrically. Paleontologic collections of mac- Buck Member, and (3) fine-grained silty sand- posed along the west side of the Sacramento rofossils were made during the measuring of stone of the uppermost Ten Mile Member. Valley, probably the best-studied fore-arc de- sections. Minor offset of bedding was observed Other outcrops of the Chico Formation exhibit posit in the world (Ojakangas, 1968; Dickinson, on more southerly exposures of the Chico For- the same three members plus an additional unit, 1971; Ingersoll, 1978, 1979). These workers in- mation, and such structural modification be- the Kingsley Cave Member, composed of mud- terpreted strata of the Great Valley sequence to comes more prominent farther north.
    [Show full text]
  • Cretaceous Research 69 (2017) 49E55
    Cretaceous Research 69 (2017) 49e55 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cretaceous Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/CretRes High-resolution calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy of the Santonian/Campanian Stage boundary, Western Interior Basin, USA * Zachary A. Kita a, , David K. Watkins a, Bradley B. Sageman b a Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA b Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA article info abstract Article history: The base of the Campanian Stage does not have a ratified Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP); Received 26 June 2016 however, several potential boundary markers have been proposed including the base of the Scaphites leei Received in revised form III ammonite Zone and the base of the paleomagnetic Chron C33r. Calcareous nannofossil assemblages 25 August 2016 from the Smoky Hill Member of the Niobrara Formation in the central Western Interior Seaway, USA Accepted in revised form 28 August 2016 were analyzed from two localities to determine relevant biohorizons and their relationships to these Available online 30 August 2016 potential boundary markers. In a previous study, the Aristocrat Angus 12-8 core (Colorado) was astro- chronologically dated and constrained using macrofossil zonations and radiometric ages. The Smoky Hill Keywords: Calcareous nannofossils Member type area (Kansas) provides an expanded interval with good to excellent nannofossil Biostratigraphy preservation.
    [Show full text]