DOCSLIB.ORG

Recent Journalism Awards Won by "Old," "New," and "Hybrid" Media Robert H

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

University of Baltimore Law ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law All Faculty Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 12-2014 Recent Journalism Awards Won by "Old," "New," and "Hybrid" Media Robert H. Lande University of Baltimore School of Law, [email protected] Thomas J. Horton University of South Dakota School of Law Virginia Callahan Independent Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/all_fac Part of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the Internet Law Commons Recommended Citation Recent Journalism Awards Won by "Old," "New," and "Hybrid" Media, University of Baltimore School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014-12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. University of Baltimore Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014-12 Recent Journalism Awards Won by 'Old," New,' and 'Hybrid' Media Robert H. Lande University of Baltimore - School of Law Thomas Jeffrey Horton University of South Dakota, School of Law Virginia Callahan Independent Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2350965 RECENT JOURNALISM AWARDS WON BY “OLD,” “NEW,” AND “HYBRID” MEDIA by Robert H. Lande, Thomas J. Horton & Virginia Callahan1 Last updated July 2013 Introduction ...................................................................................... 2 Table I: Awards for Investigatory Journalism ................................... 3 Table II: Totals for All Awards ......................................................... 3 Table III: Awards for other types of journalism that implicitly contain a significant investigatory component .................................. 4 Table IV: Pulitzer Prize Only ............................................................ 6 Donald Robinson Memorial Award for Investigative Journalism ..... 7 Gold Keyboard Award ....................................................................... 8 New York Press Club Award for Feature Reporting ......................... 9 Grantham Prize for Excellence in Reporting on the Environment .. 14 James Aronson Award for Social Justice Journalism ...................... 15 John B. Oakes Award ...................................................................... 21 The Maria Moors Cabot Prize ......................................................... 23 National Journalism Awards ........................................................... 26 George Polk Awards ........................................................................ 30 Pulitzer Prize .................................................................................... 39 Simon Rockower Awards for Excellence in Jewish Journalism ..... 44 The Sidney Awards ......................................................................... 46 Worth Bingham Prize for Investigative Journalism ........................ 51 1. The authors extend their special thanks to Neil Averitt and Albert Foer for helpful comments, and to Jennifer Burroughs, James Denvil, Sophie Li, Isaac Maron, Gary Stapleton, and Jeff Schaefer for excellent research assistance. Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2350965 2013] SHOULD THE INTERNET EXEMPT THE MEDIA SECTOR FROM ANTITRUST LAWS? 2 Introduction This compares the quality of the investigatory and local journalism contained in ―old media‖ with that contained in ―new media‖ by using the metrics the journalism industry itself uses. We ascertain which type of media has won most of the journalism awards in the years since these awards became open to the new media. To do this, we somewhat arbitrarily divided the media world into three categories: ―old,‖ ―new,‖ and ―hybrid.‖ It is admittedly extremely difficult to define ―old,‖ ―new,‖ and ―hybrid‖ types of media. Since the media sector is in flux, so too must be these definitions. Moreover, many media operations are difficult to classify. With these caveats, the ―new‖ media is the easiest to define. If a publication started online and remains online, we classify it as ―new‖ media. ―Old‖ media is difficult to define because there currently are very few newspapers, for example, that would correspond to the newspapers that existed a generation ago. Most of the traditional ―old‖ media has an online presence today. Most newspapers, including the Washington Post and the New York Times, for example, have an online version that frequently contains everything in its print edition, as well as supplemental material of a varied nature. We define these combinations of traditional hard-copy publications and their online presence as ―old‖ media even though they could not have existed a generation ago, and even if their online versions contain features commonly associated with ―new‖ media, such as videos and live chats with reporters. ―Hybrid‖ media are publications that are between new and old media in one of several ways, or are aggregations of them. Hybrid media includes four subtypes. First, hybrid media includes the convergence of old and new media. Hybrid media is the near-to or actual simultaneous use of old and new media to disseminate information. For example, hybrid media includes a print article that cites and uses an online database released concurrently with the print story. However, if the print article is the gravamen of a publication‘s efforts followed up with supplementary information online, this will be classified as old media. The converse will be classified as new media. Second, hybrid media includes a publication‘s use of both old and new media to disseminate information. The use of both media types should be near-to or approximately equal—one form, new or old, should not dominate the mode of dissemination. Third, hybrid media includes awards where the award judges mention an online or new media component as part of its decision in addition to a print source. Finally, hybrid media includes cases where an old media source and a new media source team up for a journalistic enterprise.2 For example, 2. It can be very difficult and arbitrary to classify certain sources, particularly those that we would define as hybrid sources. For example, Bloomberg would have been classified as an old media source, but its shift to a more interactive platform with the use of its subscription web-based terminal makes it more like a hybrid source. By contacting authors of the respective Bloomberg articles, we have concluded that articles not printed solely in the Bloomberg Business Week Magazine should be considered a hybrid source. In an email, Dan Golden stated that his article series ―ran on the Bloomberg terminal and web site. In addition, several of the major features . were published in print form in the magazine Bloomberg Business Week.‖ E-mail from Daniel Golden, Bloomberg News, to author (July 10, 2013, 09:11 EST) (on file with author). Another author, Janet Lorin, wrote that ―most of the stories were online only though some were also in Bloomberg Businessweek.‖ Email from Janet Lorin, Bloomberg News, to author (July 10, 2013, 06:43 EST) (on file with author). The other authors did not respond. Based on the responses we received, Bloomberg would be considered a very complex hybrid organization, with elements of both old and new media. Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2350965 2013] SHOULD THE INTERNET EXEMPT THE MEDIA SECTOR FROM ANTITRUST LAWS? 3 since the Pulitzer Prize for investigative journalism became open to the new media, there have been seven winners. Every winner was an old media source—either a traditional newspaper or the Associate Press, except for two old/new hybrid winners (see Table I infra). Table I Awards for investigative journalism, 2005 or more recent, that were open to both the ―old‖ and the ―new‖ media: Total Prize New Hybrid Old Unknown Awarded Pulitzer 7 -- 2 5 -- Golden Keyboard Award 8 -- -- 8 -- Worth Bingham Prize 4 -- 1 3 -- Donald Robinson Memorial 4 -- 2 2 -- Award National Journalism Award 4 -- -- 4 -- Sidney Award 47 11 5 31 -- Rockower Award (1st, 2nd, 12 -- -- 12 -- and 3rd places) Totals: 86 11 10 65 Table II: Totals for All Awards Award Total Awarded New Hybrid Old Unknown Donald Robinson Memorial 4 -- 2 2 -- Award for Investigative Journalism Gold Keyboard 8 -- -- 8 -- Award New York Press Club Award for 43 4 3 36 -- Feature Reporting Grantham Prize for 7 -- 4 3 -- Excellence in Reporting on 2013] SHOULD THE INTERNET EXEMPT THE MEDIA SECTOR FROM ANTITRUST LAWS? 4 the Environment James Aronson Award for 33 5 4 24 -- Social Justice Journalism John B. 9 2 3 4 -- Oakes Award The Maria Moors Cabot 18 2 1 15 -- Prize National Journalism 23 3 4 16 -- Awards George Polk 68 5 10 47 6 Awards Pulitzer Prize 37 4 9 24 -- Simon Rockower Awards for 12 -- -- 12 -- Excellence in Jewish Journalism The Sidney Awards (The 47 11 5 31 -- Hillman Foundation) Worth Bingham Prize for 4 -- 1 3 -- Investigative Journalism Totals: 313 36 46 225 6 Table III Awards for other types of journalism that implicitly contain a significant investigatory component, 2005 or more recent, that were open to both the ―old‖ and the ―new‖ media, including awards for Business reporting, Environmental reporting, and Local or Community reporting, but not awards for Commentary, Explanatory, Editorial writing, or Breaking News: 2013] SHOULD
Recommended publications
  • Freedom Or Theocracy?: Constitutionalism in Afghanistan and Iraq Hannibal Travis

    Freedom Or Theocracy?: Constitutionalism in Afghanistan and Iraq Hannibal Travis

    Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights Volume 3 | Issue 1 Article 4 Spring 2005 Freedom or Theocracy?: Constitutionalism in Afghanistan and Iraq Hannibal Travis Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njihr Recommended Citation Hannibal Travis, Freedom or Theocracy?: Constitutionalism in Afghanistan and Iraq, 3 Nw. J. Int'l Hum. Rts. 1 (2005). http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njihr/vol3/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Copyright 2005 Northwestern University School of Law Volume 3 (Spring 2005) Northwestern University Journal of International Human Rights FREEDOM OR THEOCRACY?: CONSTITUTIONALISM IN AFGHANISTAN AND IRAQ By Hannibal Travis* “Afghans are victims of the games superpowers once played: their war was once our war, and collectively we bear responsibility.”1 “In the approved version of the [Afghan] constitution, Article 3 was amended to read, ‘In Afghanistan, no law can be contrary to the beliefs and provisions of the sacred religion of Islam.’ … This very significant clause basically gives the official and nonofficial religious leaders in Afghanistan sway over every action that they might deem contrary to their beliefs, which by extension and within the Afghan cultural context, could be regarded as
  • Open House Program

    Open House Program

    Open House Agenda Monday, October 7, 2019 | 8:45 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. | North Gate Hall Twitter: @UCBSOJ | Instagram: @BerkeleyJournalism Hashtags: #UCBSOJ #BerkeleyJournalism Open House is designed for prospective students to attend as many of the day’s sessions as they wish, creating a day that best suits their needs. The expectation is that attendees will come and go from classes and information sessions as needed. Events (See Bios and Descriptions for more info) 8:45 am – 9:00 am Coffee & Refreshments (Courtyard) 10:00 am – 10:30 am Career Planning (Room B1) 10:30 am – 11:00 am Financial Planning (Room B1) 11:30 am – Noon Welcome Address by Dean Wasserman (Library) Noon – 1:00 pm Lunch (Courtyard) We’ll have themed lunch tables which you can join in order to learn more about different reporting areas. Table Reporting Themes: Audio | Democracy & Inequality | Documentary | Health, Science & Environment | Investigative | Multimedia | Narrative Writing | Photojournalism | Shortform Video 1:00 pm - 1:30 pm Investigative Reporting Program Talk (Library) 1:30 pm - 2:15 pm Chat with IRP (IRP Offices across the street, 2481 Hearst Avenue - Drop-In) 2:15 pm - 3:00 pm Chat with the Dean (Dean’s Office - Drop-In) 3:00 pm - 4:00 pm Student Panel: The Student Perspective (Library) 4:00 pm - 5:00 pm Reception with current students, faculty & staff Classes (See Bios and Descriptions for more info) 9:00 am – Noon Reporting the News J200 Sections: Democracy & Inequality Instructor: Chris Ballard | Production Lab Health & Environment Instructor: Elena Conis
  • The Civilian Impact of Drone Strikes

    The Civilian Impact of Drone Strikes

    THE CIVILIAN IMPACT OF DRONES: UNEXAMINED COSTS, UNANSWERED QUESTIONS Acknowledgements This report is the product of a collaboration between the Human Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School and the Center for Civilians in Conflict. At the Columbia Human Rights Clinic, research and authorship includes: Naureen Shah, Acting Director of the Human Rights Clinic and Associate Director of the Counterterrorism and Human Rights Project, Human Rights Institute at Columbia Law School, Rashmi Chopra, J.D. ‘13, Janine Morna, J.D. ‘12, Chantal Grut, L.L.M. ‘12, Emily Howie, L.L.M. ‘12, Daniel Mule, J.D. ‘13, Zoe Hutchinson, L.L.M. ‘12, Max Abbott, J.D. ‘12. Sarah Holewinski, Executive Director of Center for Civilians in Conflict, led staff from the Center in conceptualization of the report, and additional research and writing, including with Golzar Kheiltash, Erin Osterhaus and Lara Berlin. The report was designed by Marla Keenan of Center for Civilians in Conflict. Liz Lucas of Center for Civilians in Conflict led media outreach with Greta Moseson, pro- gram coordinator at the Human Rights Institute at Columbia Law School. The Columbia Human Rights Clinic and the Columbia Human Rights Institute are grateful to the Open Society Foundations and Bullitt Foundation for their financial support of the Institute’s Counterterrorism and Human Rights Project, and to Columbia Law School for its ongoing support. Copyright © 2012 Center for Civilians in Conflict (formerly CIVIC) and Human Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America. Copies of this report are available for download at: www.civiliansinconflict.org Cover: Shakeel Khan lost his home and members of his family to a drone missile in 2010.
  • The Pulitzer Prizes 2020 Winne

    The Pulitzer Prizes 2020 Winne

    WINNERS AND FINALISTS 1917 TO PRESENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Excerpts from the Plan of Award ..............................................................2 PULITZER PRIZES IN JOURNALISM Public Service ...........................................................................................6 Reporting ...............................................................................................24 Local Reporting .....................................................................................27 Local Reporting, Edition Time ..............................................................32 Local General or Spot News Reporting ..................................................33 General News Reporting ........................................................................36 Spot News Reporting ............................................................................38 Breaking News Reporting .....................................................................39 Local Reporting, No Edition Time .......................................................45 Local Investigative or Specialized Reporting .........................................47 Investigative Reporting ..........................................................................50 Explanatory Journalism .........................................................................61 Explanatory Reporting ...........................................................................64 Specialized Reporting .............................................................................70
  • PSC 370 H Chinese Foreign Policy Autumn 2011 Dr. Paul E. Schroeder

    PSC 370 H Chinese Foreign Policy Autumn 2011 Dr. Paul E. Schroeder

    PSC 370 H Chinese Foreign Policy Autumn 2011 Dr. Paul E. Schroeder POSC 370 H Chinese Foreign Policy Autumn 2011 The rise of China as a world power is evident in the country’s more forward and robust foreign policy. At every turn, the United States must consider China wherever American interests are at stake, be it Korea and Northeast Asia, Indochina and Southeast Asia, India/Pakistan and South Asia, or Afghanistan and Iran in the Middle East. This course describes the key factors that make up Chinese foreign policy, including its cultural tradition of dealing with foreigners, its policy-making institutions, the role of the Chinese military, domestic determinants of foreign policy, and China’s growing involvement in international regimes and issues. The course will examine China’s ever-changing foreign policy strategies, from an aggressive posture to charming its neighbors to its periodic return to a perceived aggressive stance. The course will also examine China’s role in the global economy, including issues involving international trade, currency manipulation, global warming, and China’s role in Africa and elsewhere in the growing global competition for energy resources. Throughout the course we will pay attention to how China’s foreign policy relates to international relations theories and what strategies the United States might use to manage China’s growing role in international affairs. Materials Books for Purchase: Robert G. Sutter: Chinese Foreign Relations, Rowman & Littlefield, 2008. ISBN 0-7425-5537-2 Robert G. Sutter: U.S.-Chinese Relations, Rowman & Littlefield, 2010. ISBN 978-0-7425-6842-6. James Mann: About Face: A History of America's Curious Relationship with China, From Nixon to Clinton, Knopf, 1999.
  • N Ieman Reports

    N Ieman Reports

    NIEMAN REPORTS Nieman Reports One Francis Avenue Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 Nieman Reports THE NIEMAN FOUNDATION FOR JOURNALISM AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY VOL. 62 NO. 1 SPRING 2008 VOL. 62 NO. 1 SPRING 2008 21 ST CENTURY MUCKRAKERS THE NIEMAN FOUNDATION HARVARDAT UNIVERSITY 21st Century Muckrakers Who Are They? How Do They Do Their Work? Words & Reflections: Secrets, Sources and Silencing Watchdogs Journalism 2.0 End Note went to the Carnegie Endowment in New York but of the Oakland Tribune, and Maynard was throw- found times to return to Cambridge—like many, ing out questions fast and furiously about my civil I had “withdrawal symptoms” after my Harvard rights coverage. I realized my interview was lasting ‘to promote and elevate the year—and would meet with Tenney. She came to longer than most, and I wondered, “Is he trying to my wedding in Toronto in 1984, and we tried to knock me out of competition?” Then I happened to keep in touch regularly. Several of our class, Peggy glance over at Tenney and got the only smile from standards of journalism’ Simpson, Peggy Engel, Kat Harting, and Nancy the group—and a warm, welcoming one it was. I Day visited Tenney in her assisted living facility felt calmer. Finally, when the interview ended, I in Cambridge some years ago, during a Nieman am happy to say, Maynard leaped out of his chair reunion. She cared little about her own problems and hugged me. Agnes Wahl Nieman and was always interested in others. Curator Jim Tenney was a unique woman, and I thoroughly Thomson was the public and intellectual face of enjoyed her friendship.
  • No. 19-15472(L) in the UNITED

    No. 19-15472(L) in the UNITED

    Case: 19-15472, 06/19/2019, ID: 11337072, DktEntry: 25, Page 1 of 46 No. 19-15472(L) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION; AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION; RIANA PFEFFERKORN, Movants-Appellants, WP COMPANY LLC, dba THE WASHINGTON POST, Movant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; FACEBOOK, INC., Respondents-Appellees. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS AND 23 MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS IN SUPPORT OF MOVANTS-APPELLANTS URGING REVERSAL [Caption continued on next page] Case: 19-15472, 06/19/2019, ID: 11337072, DktEntry: 25, Page 2 of 46 Katie Townsend, Esq. Counsel of Record Bruce D. Brown, Esq. Gabriel Rottman, Esq. Caitlin Vogus, Esq. Linda Moon, Esq. Gunita Singh, Esq. THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS 1156 15th St. NW, Suite 1020 Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 795-9300 Facsimile: (202) 795-9310 [email protected] Additional amici counsel listed in Appendix A Case: 19-15472, 06/19/2019, ID: 11337072, DktEntry: 25, Page 3 of 46 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press is an unincorporated association of reporters and editors with no parent corporation and no stock. American Society of News Editors is a private, non-stock corporation that has no parent. The Associated Press Media Editors has no parent corporation and does not issue any stock. Association of Alternative Newsmedia has no parent corporation and does not issue any stock.
  • LGST 642X Q2 2016 Syllabus 101816

    LGST 642X Q2 2016 Syllabus 101816

    LGST 642x Big Data, Big Responsibilities: The Law and Ethics of Business Analytics Q2 2016 | MW 10:30am-12pm | JMHH F65 Overview Significant technologies always have unintended consequences, and their effects are never neutral. A world of ubiquitous data, subject to ever more sophisticated collection, aggregation, analysis, and use, creates massive opportunities for both financial gain and social good. It also creates dangers in areas such as privacy and discrimination, as well as simple hubris about the effectiveness of management by algorithm. This course introduces students to the legal, policy, and ethical dimensions of big data, predictive analytics, and related techniques. It then examines responses—both private and governmental—that may be employed to address these concerns. Instructor Associate Professor Kevin Werbach Department of Legal Studies and Business Ethics 673 Huntsman Hall (215) 898-1222 [email protected] (best way to reach me) Office Hours: Monday 12:30-2pm, or by appointment Learning Objectives Good data-driven decision-making means not just generating solutions, but understanding how to use them. Some of the most sophisticated firms in terms of data science expertise have already gotten into trouble over concerns about privacy, security, manipulation, and discrimination. Failure to anticipate such issues can result in ethical lapses, public relations disasters, regulatory sanctions, and even legal liability. My goal is to help you develop the skills to use analytics in the most responsible way, while remaining focused on your business objectives. After completion of the course, you should be able to: 1. Identify where algorithms depend on human judgments or assumptions. 2.
  • The New Investor Tom C.W

    The New Investor Tom C.W

    The New Investor Tom C.W. Lin EVIEW R ABSTRACT A sea change is happening in finance. Machines appear to be on the rise and humans on LA LAW LA LAW the decline. Human endeavors have become unmanned endeavors. Human thought and UC human deliberation have been replaced by computerized analysis and mathematical models. Technological advances have made finance faster, larger, more global, more interconnected, and less human. Modern finance is becoming an industry in which the main players are no longer entirely human. Instead, the key players are now cyborgs: part machine, part human. Modern finance is transforming into what this Article calls cyborg finance. This Article offers one of the first broad, descriptive, and normative examinations of this sea change and its wide-ranging effects on law, society, and finance. The Article begins by placing the rise of artificial intelligence and computerization in finance within a larger social context. Next, it explores the evolution and birth of a new investor paradigm in law precipitated by that rise. This Article then identifies and addresses regulatory dangers, challenges, and consequences tied to the increasing reliance on artificial intelligence and computers. Specifically, it warns of emerging financial threats in cyberspace, examines new systemic risks linked to speed and connectivity, studies law’s capacity to govern this evolving financial landscape, and explores the growing resource asymmetries in finance. Finally, drawing on themes from the legal discourse about the choice between rules and standards, this Article closes with a defense of humans in an uncertain financial world in which machines continue to rise, and it asserts that smarter humans working with smart machines possess the key to better returns and better futures.
  • Theire Journal

    Theire Journal

    CONTENTS 20 A MUCKRAKING LIFE THE IRE JOURNAL Early investigative journalist provides relevant lessons TABLE OF CONTENTS By Steve Weinberg MAY/JUNE 2003 The IRE Journal 4 IRE gaining momentum 22 – 31 FOLLOWING THE FAITHFUL in drive for “Breakthroughs” By Brant Houston PRIEST SCANDAL The IRE Journal Globe court battle unseals church records, 5 NEWS BRIEFS AND MEMBER NEWS reveals longtime abuse By Sacha Pfeiffer 8 WINNERS NAMED The Boston Globe IN 2002 IRE AWARDS By The IRE Journal FAITH HEALER Hidden cameras help, 12 2003 CONFERENCE LINEUP hidden records frustrate FEATURES HOTTEST TOPICS probe into televangelist By MaryJo Sylwester By Meade Jorgensen USA Today Dateline NBC 15 BUDGET PROPOSAL CITY PORTRAITS Despite economy, IRE stays stable, Role of religion increases training and membership starkly different By Brant Houston in town profiles The IRE Journal By Jill Lawrence USA Today COUNTING THE FAITHFUL 17 THE BLACK BELT WITH CHURCH ROLL DATA Alabama’s Third World IMAM UPROAR brought to public attention By Ron Nixon Imam’s history The IRE Journal By John Archibald, Carla Crowder hurts credibility and Jeff Hansen on local scene The Birmingham News By Tom Merriman WJW-Cleveland 18 INTERVIEWS WITH THE INTERVIEWERS Confrontational interviews By Lori Luechtefeld 34 TORTURE The IRE Journal Iraqi athletes report regime’s cruelties By Tom Farrey ESPN.com ABOUT THE COVER 35 FOI REPORT Bishop Wilton D. Gregory, Paper intervenes in case to argue for public database president of the U. S. Conference By Ziva Branstetter of Catholic Bishops, listens to a Tulsa World question after the opening session of the conference.
  • Read the 2018-2019 Shorenstein Center Annual Report

    Read the 2018-2019 Shorenstein Center Annual Report

    Annual Report 2018–2019 Contents Letter from the Director 2 2018–2019 Highlights 4 Areas of Focus Technology and Social Change Research Project 6 Misinformation Research 8 Digital Platforms and Democracy 10 News Quality Journalist’s Resource 12 The Goldsmith Awards 15 News Sustainability 18 Race & Equity 20 Events Annual Lectures 22 Theodore H. White Lecture on Press and Politics 23 Salant Lecture on Freedom of the Press 33 Speaker Series 41 The Student Experience 43 Fellows 45 Staff, Faculty, Board, and Supporters 47 From the Director Like the air we breathe and the water we drink, the information we consume sustains the health of the body politic. Good information nourishes democracy; bad information poisons it. The mission of the Shorenstein Center is to support and protect the information ecosystem. This means promoting access to reliable information through our work with journalists, policymakers, civil society, and scholars, while also slowing the spread of bad information, from hate speech to “fake news” to all kinds of distortion and media manipulation. The public square has always had to contend with liars, propagandists, dividers, and demagogues. But the tools for creating toxic information are more powerful and widely available than ever before, and the effects more dangerous. How our generation responds to threats we did not foresee, fueled by technologies we have not contained, is the central challenge of our age. How do journalists cover the impact of misinformation without spreading it further? How do technology companies,
  • May 4, 2012 VIA REGULAR MAIL A.T. Smith Deputy Director U.S. Secret

    May 4, 2012 VIA REGULAR MAIL A.T. Smith Deputy Director U.S. Secret

    May 4, 2012 1101 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1100 Arlington, Va. 22209-2211 VIA REGULAR MAIL (703) 807-2100 www.rcfp.org A.T. Smith Lucy A. Dalglish Executive Director Deputy Director U.S. Secret Service STEERING COMMITTEE Communications Center SCOTT APPLEWHITE 245 Murray Lane, S.W. The Associated Press WOLF BLITZER Building T-5 CNN Washington, D.C. 20223 DAVID BOARDMAN Seattle Times CHIP BOK Creators Syndicate Freedom of Information Act Appeal ERIKA BOLSTAD Expedited Processing Requested for File Nos. 20120546-20120559 McClatchy Newspapers JESS BRAVIN The Wall Street Journal MICHAEL DUFFY Time Dear Mr. Smith: RICHARD S. DUNHAM Houston Chronicle This is an appeal of a denial of expedited processing under the Freedom of ASHLEA EBELING Forbes Magazine Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)(E)(i)(I) (“FOIA”), and 6 C.F.R., FRED GRAHAM InSession Chapter 1, Part 5 § 5.5. On March 27, 2012, I made a FOIA request to the JOHN C. HENRY Department of Homeland Security for expedited processing of the following: Freelance NAT HENTOFF United Media Newspaper Syndicate 1. Perfected, pending FOIA request letters submitted to your office on DAHLIA LITHWICK Slate the dates provided below, which were listed on the Securities and Exchange TONY MAURO Commission’s 2011 Annual FOIA report as being included in the “10 Oldest National Law Journal Pending Perfected FOIA Requests:”1 DOYLE MCMANUS Los Angeles Times 11/30/2005 ANDREA MITCHELL NBC News 12/2/2005 MAGGIE MULVIHILL 12/2/2005 New England Center for Investigative Reporting BILL NICHOLS 1/19/2006 Politico SANDRA PEDDIE 1/19/2006 Newsday 1/19/2006 DANA PRIEST The Washington Post 1/19/2006 DAN RATHER HD Net 2.