DOCSLIB.ORG

Many Voices, One Message Campaign

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Many Voices, One Message Campaign We join together in saying we will not tolerate domestic abuse in the Jewish community. Rabbi Laura Abrasley Rabbi Noah Cheses Rabbi William Hamilton Cantor Bruce Malin Rabbi Gershon Segal Temple Shalom Young Israel of Sharon Congregation Kehillath Israel Emeritus, Cape Cod Synagogue Congregation Beth El Atereth Israel, Rabbi Alison Adler Rabbi David Cohen- Rabbi David Hellman Rabbi Howard Mandell Newton Temple B’nai Abraham Henriquez Young Israel of Brookline Congregation Beth Israel Rabbi Charni Flame Selch Temple Sinai, Marblehead Rabbi Katy Allen Rabbi Greg Hersh Rabbi Todd Markley Rabbi Rachel Silverman Ma’yan Tikvah Rabbi Braham David Temple Emmanuel of Wakefield Temple Beth Shalom, Needham Temple Israel of Sharon Temple Shalom Medford Rabbi Thomas Alpert Rabbi Neil Hirsch Cantor Michael McCloskey Rabbi Joel Sisenwine Temple Etz Chaim, Franklin Rabbi Joe Eiduson Hevreh of Southern Berkshire Temple Emeth Temple Beth Elohim Congregation B’nai Shalom, Rabbinic Pastor Matia Rabbi Sandi Intraub Rabbi Joseph Meszler Rabbi Matthew Soffer Westborough Angelou Beth El Temple Center, Belmont Temple Sinai of Sharon Temple Israel of Boston Jewish Chaplaincy Council of Rabbi Michael Fel Rabbi Suzie Jacobson Rabbi David J. Meyer Rabbi Robin Sparr Massachusetts Temple Emunah Temple Emanu-El, Marblehead Temple Israel of Boston Rabbi Jon Spira-Savett Rabbi Sharon Cohen Rabbi Arnie Fertig Rabbi Howard L. Jaffe Rabbi Suzanne Offit Temple Beth Abraham, Nashua Anisfeld Temple Beth Shalom, Melrose Hebrew SeniorLife Temple Isaiah Rabbi Toba Spitzer Hebrew College Rabbi Sally Finestone Rabbi Randy Kafka Rabbi Allison Peiser Congregation Dorshei Tzedek Rabbi Jordana Schuster Congregation Or Atid Temple Beth Shalom, Melrose Temple Kol Tikvah, Sharon Rabbi Keith Stern Battis Rabbi Levi Fogelman Temple Beth Shalom of Needham Rabbi Cherie Koller-Fox Rabbi Barbara Penzner Temple Beth Avodah Chabad Center of Natick Temple Hillel B’nai Torah Jewish Chaplaincy Council of Rabbi Liza Stern Rabbi Alfred H. Benjamin Rabbi David Freelund Congregation Beth Shalom of the Massachusetts Rabbi Carl Perkins Congregation Eitz Chayim, Cambridge Cape Code Synagogue Temple Aliyah Blue Hills Grand Rabbi Y. A. Korff, Rabbi Jason Strauss Rabbi Shmaya Friedman Rabbi Aliza Berger Zvhil-Mezbuz Rebbe Rabbi Jay Perlman Congregation Kadimah-Toras Moshe Chabad of the North Shore Temple Beth Shalom, Needham Temple Emanuel Chaplain of the City of Boston Cantor Jodi Sufrin Rabbi Shoshana Meira Rabbi Jonathan Kraus Rabbi Richard Perlman Temple Beth Elohim, Wellesley Rabbi Audrey Marcus Friedman Beth El Temple Center Temple Ner Tamid Berkman Temple Sinai of Brookline Rabbi Michael Swarttz Temple Ohabei Shalom Rabbi Claudia Kreiman Rabbi Marcia Plumb Beth Tikvah Synagogue, Westborough Rabbi Wes Gardenswartz Congregation Mishkan Tefila Rabbi Daniel Berman Temple Emanuel Temple Beth Zion, Brookline Rabbi David B. Thomas Temple Reyim Rabbi Michael Ragozin Congregation Beth El of the Sudbury Rabbi Carol Glass Rabbi Judith Kummer Rabbi Allison Berry Jewish Chaplaincy Council of Congregation Shirat Hayam River Valley Temple Shalom Rabbi Mark Glass Massachusetts Rabbi Victor Reinstein Cantor Louise Treitman The Adams Street Shul Rabbi Moshe Bleich Rabbi Ben Lanckton Nehar Shalom Community Synagogue Beth El Temple Center, Belmont Wellesley Weston Chabad Rabbi Andrea M. Gouze Massachusetts General Hospital Rabbi Michelle Robinson Rabbi Mendy Uminer Temple Beth Emunah Rabbi Josh Breindel Rabbi Allan Lehmann Temple Emanuel Chabad at Chestnut Hill Temple Anshe Amunim Rabbi Jen Gubitz Rabbinical School of Hebrew College Rabbi Mike Rothbaum Rabbi Andrew Vogel Temple Israel of Boston Congregation Beth Elohim Rabbi Caryn Broitman Rabbi Darby Leigh Temple Sinai, Brookline Rabbi Rachel Gurevitz Hazzan Shoshana Brown Kerem Shalom Rabbi Dr. Benjamin J. Rabbi Moshe Waldoks Congregation B’nai Shalom, Samuels Temple Beth El, Fall River Rabbi David Lerner Temple Beth Zion (TBZ) Westborough Congregation Shaarei Tefillah Rabbi Avi Bukiet Temple Emunah Rabbi David Winship Rabbi Mendel Gurkow Rabbi Rachel Saphire Temple Beth David of the South Shore Center for Jewish Life Rabbi Shayke Lerner Shaloh House Chabad of the South Area Temple Beth Elohim Rabbi Kenneth Carr Chabad Center of Brookline Rabbi Julie Wolkoff Rabbi Zalman Gurkow Cantor Hollis Schachner Temple Chayai Shalom Rabbi Elaine Zecher Chabad of Nashoba Valley Rabbi Yossi Lipsker Temple Shir Tikva Chabad of the North Shore Temple Israel of Boston Rabbi Peretz Chein Cantor Peter Halpern Chabad House of Brandeis Rabbi Mayshe Schwartz JDVC Temple Shalom Rabbi Julie Zupan JDVC This project was partially supported by the Massachusetts Office for JDVC Victim Assistance through a Victims of Crime Act of 1984 (VOCA) grant from the Office for Victims of Crime, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. JDVC JDVC Department of Justice. We deeply appreciate this support. JDVC We are grateful to the Miriam Fund, which supported the Safe Havens/JF&CS JDVC Journey to Safety partnership and our research this past year. JDVC JDVC JDVC JDVC.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Debate Over Mixed Seating in the American Synagogue
    Jack Wertheimer (ed.) The American Synagogue: A Sanctuary Transformed. New York: Cambridge 13 University Press, 1987 The Debate over Mixed Seating in the American Synagogue JONATHAN D. SARNA "Pues have never yet found an historian," John M. Neale com­ plained, when he undertook to survey the subject of church seating for the Cambridge Camden Society in 1842. 1 To a large extent, the same situation prevails today in connection with "pues" in the American syn­ agogue. Although it is common knowledge that American synagogue seating patterns have changed greatly over time - sometimes following acrimonious, even violent disputes - the subject as a whole remains unstudied, seemingly too arcane for historians to bother with. 2 Seating patterns, however, actually reflect down-to-earth social realities, and are richly deserving of study. Behind wearisome debates over how sanctuary seats should be arranged and allocated lie fundamental disagreements over the kinds of social and religious values that the synagogue should project and the relationship between the synagogue and the larger society that surrounds it. As we shall see, where people sit reveals much about what they believe. The necessarily limited study of seating patterns that follows focuses only on the most important and controversial seating innovation in the American synagogue: mixed (family) seating. Other innovations - seats that no longer face east, 3 pulpits moved from center to front, 4 free (un­ assigned) seating, closed-off pew ends, and the like - require separate treatment. As we shall see, mixed seating is a ramified and multifaceted issue that clearly reflects the impact of American values on synagogue life, for it pits family unity, sexual equality, and modernity against the accepted Jewish legal (halachic) practice of sexual separatiop in prayer.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tribu1e 10 Eslller, Mv Panner in Torah
    gudath Israel of America's voice in kind of informed discussion and debate the halls of courts and the corri­ that leads to concrete action. dors of Congress - indeed every­ A But the convention is also a major where it exercises its shtadlonus on yardstick by which Agudath Israel's behalf of the Kial - is heard more loudly strength as a movement is measured. and clearly when there is widespread recognition of the vast numbers of peo­ So make this the year you ple who support the organization and attend an Agm:fah conventicm. share its ideals. Resente today An Agudah convention provides a forum Because your presence sends a for benefiting from the insights and powerfo! - and ultimately for choice aa:ommodotions hadracha of our leaders and fosters the empowering - message. call 111-m-nao is pleased to announce the release of the newest volume of the TlHllE RJENNlERT JED>JITJION ~7~r> lEN<ClY<ClUO>lPElOl l[}\ ~ ·.:~.~HDS. 1CA\J~YA<Gr M(][1CZ\V<Q . .:. : ;······~.·····················.-~:·:····.)·\.~~····· ~s of thousands we~ed.(>lig~!~d~ith the best-selling mi:i:m niw:.r c .THE :r~~··q<:>Jy(MANDMENTS, the inaugural volume of theEntzfl(lj)('dia (Mitzvoth 25-38). Now join us aswestartfromthebeginning. The En~yclop~dia provides yau with • , • A panciramicviewofthe entire Torah .Laws, cust9ms and details about each Mitzvah The pririlafy reasons and insights for each Mitzvah. tteas.. ury.· of Mid. ra. shim and stories from Cha. zal... and m.uc.h.. n\ ''"'''''' The Encyclopedia of the Taryag Mitzvoth The Taryag Legacy Foundation is a family treasure that is guaranteed to wishes to thank enrich, inspire, and elevate every Jewish home.
    [Show full text]
  • A Fresh Perspective on the History of Hasidic Judaism
    eSharp Issue 20: New Horizons A Fresh Perspective on the History of Hasidic Judaism Eva van Loenen (University of Southampton) Introduction In this article, I shall examine the history of Hasidic Judaism, a mystical,1 ultra-orthodox2 branch of Judaism, which values joyfully worshipping God’s presence in nature as highly as the strict observance of the laws of Torah3 and Talmud.4 In spite of being understudied, the history of Hasidic Judaism has divided historians until today. Indeed, Hasidic Jewish history is not one monolithic, clear-cut, straightforward chronicle. Rather, each scholar has created his own narrative and each one is as different as its author. While a brief introduction such as this cannot enter into all the myriad divergences and similarities between these stories, what I will attempt to do here is to incorporate and compare an array of different views in order to summarise the history of Hasidism and provide a more objective analysis, which has not yet been undertaken. Furthermore, my historical introduction in Hasidic Judaism will exemplify how mystical branches of mainstream religions might develop and shed light on an under-researched division of Judaism. The main focus of 1 Mystical movements strive for a personal experience of God or of his presence and values intuitive, spiritual insight or revelationary knowledge. The knowledge gained is generally ‘esoteric’ (‘within’ or hidden), leading to the term ‘esotericism’ as opposed to exoteric, based on the external reality which can be attested by anyone. 2 Ultra-orthodox Jews adhere most strictly to Jewish law as the holy word of God, delivered perfectly and completely to Moses on Mount Sinai.
    [Show full text]
  • Lelov: Cultural Memory and a Jewish Town in Poland. Investigating the Identity and History of an Ultra - Orthodox Society
    Lelov: cultural memory and a Jewish town in Poland. Investigating the identity and history of an ultra - orthodox society. Item Type Thesis Authors Morawska, Lucja Rights <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by- nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>. Download date 03/10/2021 19:09:39 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/7827 University of Bradford eThesis This thesis is hosted in Bradford Scholars – The University of Bradford Open Access repository. Visit the repository for full metadata or to contact the repository team © University of Bradford. This work is licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence. Lelov: cultural memory and a Jewish town in Poland. Investigating the identity and history of an ultra - orthodox society. Lucja MORAWSKA Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Social and International Studies University of Bradford 2012 i Lucja Morawska Lelov: cultural memory and a Jewish town in Poland. Investigating the identity and history of an ultra - orthodox society. Key words: Chasidism, Jewish History in Eastern Europe, Biederman family, Chasidic pilgrimage, Poland, Lelov Abstract. Lelov, an otherwise quiet village about fifty miles south of Cracow (Poland), is where Rebbe Dovid (David) Biederman founder of the Lelov ultra-orthodox (Chasidic) Jewish group, - is buried.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the State of New York Draft County of New York
    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK DRAFT COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------------X : CONGREGATION BETH ELOHIM : : and : : UNION TEMPLE OF BROOKLYN : : Petitioners, : Index No. ___________ : : VERIFIED PETITION : For an Order Approving Their Merger under Section 208 : of the Religious Corporations Law : : -------------------------------------------------------------------------X Petitioner Congregation Beth Elohim and Petitioner Union Temple of Brooklyn respectfully state that: 1. (a) Petitioner Congregation Beth Elohim is a religious corporation organized under the New York Religious Corporations Law (“RCL”) whose articles of incorporation were filed in the Office of the Clerk of Kings County on February 9, 1862. A copy of the articles of incorporation of Congregation Beth Elohim is attached hereto as Exhibit A-1 and a copy of the Bylaws of Congregation Beth Elohim, as modified to reflect the approved terms of the Merger (as defined below), is attached hereto as Exhibit A-2. (b) Petitioner Union Temple of Brooklyn is a religious corporation organized under the RCL whose articles of incorporation were filed in the Office of the Clerk of Kings County on September 1, 1921. A copy of the articles of incorporation of Union Temple of Brooklyn is attached hereto as Exhibit B-1 and a copy of the Bylaws of Union Temple of Brooklyn is attached hereto as Exhibit B-2. 12085747v.1 (c) This petition is made in support of an application for an Order, under Section 208 of the RCL, approving the
    [Show full text]
  • L1teracy As the Creation of Personal Meaning in the Lives of a Select Group of Hassidic Women in Quebec
    WOMEN OF VALOUR: L1TERACY AS THE CREATION OF PERSONAL MEANING IN THE LIVES OF A SELECT GROUP OF HASSIDIC WOMEN IN QUEBEC by Sharyn Weinstein Sepinwall The Department of Integrated Studies in Education A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research , in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Education Faculty of Education McGiII University National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1+1 of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Ottawa ON K1A ON4 canada Canada Our fie Notre réIérfInœ The author bas granted a non­ L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library ofCanada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies ofthis thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/film, de reproduction sur papier ou sur fonnat électronique. The author retains ownership ofthe L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts from it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son pemnsslOn. autorisation. 0-612-78770-2 Canada Women of Valour: Literacy as the Creation of Personal Meaning in the Lives of a Select Group of Hassidic Women in Quebec Sharyn Weinstein Sepinwall 11 Acknowledgments One of my colleagues at McGiII in the Faculty of Management was fond of saying "writing a dissertation should change your life." Her own dissertation had been reviewed in the Wall Street Journal and its subsequent acclaim had indeed, 1surmised, changed her life.
    [Show full text]
  • Hasidic Judaism - Wikipedia, the Freevisited Encyclopedi Ona 1/6/2015 Page 1 of 19
    Hasidic Judaism - Wikipedia, the freevisited encyclopedi ona 1/6/2015 Page 1 of 19 Hasidic Judaism From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Sephardic pronunciation: [ħasiˈdut]; Ashkenazic , תודיסח :Hasidic Judaism (from the Hebrew pronunciation: [χaˈsidus]), meaning "piety" (or "loving-kindness"), is a branch of Orthodox Judaism that promotes spirituality through the popularization and internalization of Jewish mysticism as the fundamental aspect of the faith. It was founded in 18th-century Eastern Europe by Rabbi Israel Baal Shem Tov as a reaction against overly legalistic Judaism. His example began the characteristic veneration of leadership in Hasidism as embodiments and intercessors of Divinity for the followers. [1] Contrary to this, Hasidic teachings cherished the sincerity and concealed holiness of the unlettered common folk, and their equality with the scholarly elite. The emphasis on the Immanent Divine presence in everything gave new value to prayer and deeds of kindness, alongside rabbinical supremacy of study, and replaced historical mystical (kabbalistic) and ethical (musar) asceticism and admonishment with Simcha, encouragement, and daily fervor.[2] Hasidism comprises part of contemporary Haredi Judaism, alongside the previous Talmudic Lithuanian-Yeshiva approach and the Sephardi and Mizrahi traditions. Its charismatic mysticism has inspired non-Orthodox Neo-Hasidic thinkers and influenced wider modern Jewish denominations, while its scholarly thought has interested contemporary academic study. Each Hasidic Jews praying in the Hasidic dynasty follows its own principles; thus, Hasidic Judaism is not one movement but a synagogue on Yom Kippur, by collection of separate groups with some commonality. There are approximately 30 larger Hasidic Maurycy Gottlieb groups, and several hundred smaller groups. Though there is no one version of Hasidism, individual Hasidic groups often share with each other underlying philosophy, worship practices, dress (borrowed from local cultures), and songs (borrowed from local cultures).
    [Show full text]
  • Hasidic Literature As a Literary Tradition
    Elly Moseson Work-in-progress – Not for circulation or citation Hasidic Literature as a Literary Tradition I. Introduction One of the most significant contributions of the Hasidic movement to Jewish culture is its vast and rich literary tradition. Over the past two and a half centuries, Hasidic writers have produced thousands of books many of which have had great influence both within the movement and beyond it. In addition to their value as creative works of religious literature in their own right, these works also provide insight into Hasidic history, ideology and culture. However, much about the origins and development of this tradition remains obscure. How and when did the Hasidic literary tradition begin? What is its exact relationship to the Hasidic movement? In what sense can we even speak of Hasidic literature as a distinct literary tradition? How do we define the Hasidic literary corpus and what are the criteria by which to include or exclude a given work from it? The designation of a given body of texts as a distinct literary tradition generally implies the recognition of some shared elements and thus serves to facilitate our understanding of these texts by highlighting certain historical connections or common thematic or stylistic features. This is presumably also the case when we speak about Hasidic literature but what exactly is distinctive in either the form or content of Hasidic texts that can be used to tie them to each other is not entirely obvious. While it is of course reasonable to assume that there is some relation between Hasidic literature and the Hasidic movement, determining what exactly is this relation is complicated by the fact that the Hasidic movement itself is not easy to define, especially in its formative period.
    [Show full text]
  • Women and Hasidism: a “Non-Sectarian” Perspective
    Jewish History (2013) 27: 399–434 © The Author(s) 2013. This article is published DOI: 10.1007/s10835-013-9190-x with open access at Springerlink.com Women and Hasidism: A “Non-Sectarian” Perspective MARCIN WODZINSKI´ University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Hasidism has often been defined and viewed as a sect. By implication, if Hasidism was indeed a sect, then membership would have encompassed all the social ties of the “sectari- ans,” including their family ties, thus forcing us to consider their mothers, wives, and daughters as full-fledged female hasidim. In reality, however, women did not become hasidim in their own right, at least not in terms of the categories implied by the definition of Hasidism as a sect. Reconsideration of the logical implications of the identification of Hasidism as a sect leads to a radical re-evaluation of the relationship between the hasidic movement and its female con- stituency, and, by extension, of larger issues concerning the boundaries of Hasidism. Keywords Hasidism · Eastern Europe · Gender · Women · Sectarianism · Family Introduction Beginning with Jewish historiography during the Haskalah period, through Wissenschaft des Judentums, to Dubnow and the national school, scholars have traditionally regarded Hasidism as a sect. This view had its roots in the earliest critiques of Hasidism, first by the mitnagedim and subsequently by the maskilim.1 It attributed to Hasidism the characteristic features of a sect, 1The term kat hahasidim (the sect of hasidim)orkat hamithasedim (the sect of false hasidim or sanctimonious hypocrites) appears often in the anti-hasidic polemics of the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of Kahal Kadosh Beth Elohim of Charleston, SC
    The Story of Kahal Kadosh Beth Elohim of Charleston, SC Congregation Founded 1749 Religious School Founded 1838 Present Sanctuary Built 1840 A National Historic Landmark of the United States The Oldest Synagogue in continuous use in the United States Founding Reform Jewish Congregation in the United States www.kkbe.org 2 Beginnings The story of Kahal Kadosh Beth Elohim (KKBE) is one of faith, devotion, and perseverance in the American tradition of freedom of worship. Charleston was established in 1670; the earliest known reference to a Jew in the English settlement was in 1695. Soon other, primarily Sephardic, Jews followed, attracted by the civil and religious liberty of South Carolina. By 1749, these pioneers were sufficiently numerous to organize our congregation, Kahal Kadosh Beth Elohim (Holy Congregation House of God). Fifteen years later, they also 1794 Synagogue before fire in 1838 established the now historic Coming Street Cemetery, the South’s oldest remaining colonial Jewish burial site. At first congregants worshipped in private homes; in 1780 they used an improvised synagogue adjacent to the present Temple grounds. In 1794 they dedicated a new synagogue building described then as the largest in the United States, “spacious and elegant” which signified the high degree of social acceptance Charleston Jews enjoyed. This handsome, cupolated Georgian synagogue was destroyed in the great Charleston fire of 1838 and replaced in 1840 on the same Hasell Street site by the present imposing structure. The Interior before 1838 fire by colonnaded Temple, dedicated in early 1841, is Solomon Nunez Carvalho renowned as one of the country’s finest examples of Greek Revival architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear CBE/Union Temple Community, We Are
    Dear CBE/Union Temple Community, We are thrilled to write with the exciting news that, in a near unanimous vote, the memberships of both Congregation Beth Elohim and Union Temple decided to combine our congregations. We now petition the New York Supreme Court requesting approval of the merger. This represents an incredibly exciting future for our congregations. Together, we will create a thriving center for progressive Jewish life in Brooklyn for decades to come. Our three-building campus, stretching from Park Slope to Prospect Heights and beyond, will grow our ability to serve Jews of all ages through lifelong learning, spiritual life, arts and culture, and engagement with the world around us, as well as to build upon the programs and services we currently provide. Most importantly, we will build a community where we support each other, and where we, as Jews, can ask the hardest questions about how we make meaning in our lives and what our purpose is while we are here. We will create a place for human connection, meaning, and joy, a life-affirming place where Jews and our partners of all faiths come together to dream of a world redeemed. We’ve reached this moment through the hard work of our CBE-Union Temple Merger Exploration Committee, including Jonathan Gertman, Emily Kurtz, Tomer Inbar, Rob Raich and Alan Herman. Thank you for being part of this historic moment for our congregations. L’Shalom, John Horowitz, President of CBE Rabbi Rachel Timoner Jeff Stein, President of Union Temple Rabbi Stephanie Kolin.
    [Show full text]
  • June 20, 2018 the Honorable Jeff Sessions Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice Washington, DC 20530 the Honorable Kirstje
    June 20, 2018 The Honorable Jeff Sessions Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice Washington, DC 20530 The Honorable Kirstjen Nielsen Secretary of Homeland Security Department of Homeland Security Washington, DC 20528 Dear Attorney General Sessions and Secretary Nielsen, On behalf of the 55 undersigned national and 291 state and local Jewish organizations and institutions, we write to express our strong opposition to the recently expanded “zero-tolerance” policy that includes separating children from their migrant parents when they cross the border. This policy undermines the values of our nation and jeopardizes the safety and well-being of thousands of people. As Jews, we understand the plight of being an immigrant fleeing violence and oppression. We believe that the United States is a nation of immigrants and how we treat the stranger reflects on the moral values and ideals of this nation. Many of these migrant families are seeking asylum in the United States to escape violence in Central America. Taking children away from their families is unconscionable. Such practices inflict unnecessary trauma on parents and children, many of whom have already suffered traumatic experiences. This added trauma negatively impacts physical and mental health, including increasing the risk of early death.1 Separating families is a cruel punishment for children and families simply seeking a better life and exacerbates existing challenges in our immigration system. It adds to the backlog of deportation cases and legal challenges in federal courts, places thousands more immigrants in detention facilities and shelters, endangers the lives of more children, and instills additional fear in people seeking safety in our country.
    [Show full text]