DOCSLIB.ORG

Tarwin Valley Coastal Guardians Inc. (TVCG Inc.) (No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tarwin Valley Coastal Guardians Inc. (TVCG Inc.) (No Tarwin Valley Coastal Guardians Inc. (TVCG Inc.) (No. A0042978C) C/- The Secretary 26th February, 2015 Ms Jeanette Radcliffe Committee Secretary Select Committee on Wind Turbines PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Dear Ms. Radcliffe, Please accept this submission from Tarwin Valley Coastal Guardians Inc. (TVGC) to the Senate Select Committee on Wind Turbines. In this submission, we detail some of our experiences of the planning and environment assessment, approval, compliance and enforcement processes for the Bald Hills Wind Energy Facility (BHWEF), Tarwin Lower in South Gippsland, Victoria during its pre- construction and construction, but not post-construction, stages. At the time of writing, the BHWEF had not commenced generation. The timescale covered by this submission is 2004 to current. Our submission is made in two parts: A and B. The attached document is Part A (hereafter referred to as the “TVCG Part A Sub”). It was commissioned by TVCG Inc. and prepared by consulting researcher and advocate, Ms. Cheryl Wragg, in consultation with TVCG members. TVCG Part A Sub refers to statutory planning and related aspects of WEF regulation. The TVCG Part B SubReport has already been submitted separately The TVCG Part B SubReport was commissioned by TVCG in 2009 and refers to BHWEF statutory environmental assessment processes. It was prepared by evolutionary biologist, Dr. Lucas Bluff, in consultation with TVCG members. Our submission refers to two distinct regulatory areas for wind energy facilities (WEF) – statutory planning, and the environment, and refers to the following Senate Select Committee ToRs: • how effective the Clean Energy Regulator is in performing its legislative responsibilities and whether there is a need to broaden those responsibilities (ToR ‘b’); • the implementation of planning processes in relation to wind farms, including the level of information available to prospective wind farm hosts (ToR ‘d’ ); • the adequacy of monitoring and compliance governance of wind farms (ToR ‘e’ ); • the application and integrity of national wind farm guidelines (ToR ‘f’ ); • the effect that wind towers have on fauna and aerial operations around turbines, including firefighting and crop management (ToR ‘g’). We define ‘fauna’ in (g) to include wildlife. 1 We would welcome the opportunity to present to the Senate Select Committee about our submission. We would greatly appreciate if the Committee was able to schedule public hearings in Melbourne to facilitate easier attendance by TVCG representatives. If you have any questions about the contents of our submission please contact Cheryl Wragg If the Senate Select Committee is organising presentations, please contact me about TVCG representation. Yours sincerely, Mr. Lindsay Overall Secretary TVCG Inc. 2 Tarwin Valley Coastal Guardians Inc. (TVCG Inc.) TVCG Part A Submission to the Senate Select Committee on Wind Turbines Prepared by Ms. Cheryl Wragg in consultation with TVCG members Tarwin Valley Coastal Guardians Inc. (No. A0042978C) Mr. Lindsay Overall, Secretary Mr. Don Jelbart, President 3 Index 1. About TVCG Inc……………………………………………………. 5 2. Site and surrounds of the BHWEF……………………………… 5 3. Details of the BHWEF……………………………………………… 6 4. Objections to the BHWEF…………………………………………. 6 5. 2004 Planning Panel’s Regulatory Approaches………………. 9 6. Victoria’s WEF statutory planning & regulation and comments about the Panel’s regulatory approaches ….………………….. 12 6.1 Victoria’s WEF statutory planning arrangements……. 12 6.2 Regulating Bat and Avifauna Impacts………………….. 14 6.3 Protection of Coastal landscape………………………... 14 6.4 Regulating Acoustic Emissions…………………………. 15 6.5 Regulating residential amenity of future dwellings at pre WEF amenity Standards……………………………....19 7. Sorting out permit breaches and regulatory failures the VCAT way……………………………………………………………………. 23 8. Monitoring and compliance governance of BHWEF during construction…………………………………………………………. 28 8.1 Cultural Heritage Management Plans…………………... 29 8.2 Unauthorised relocation of Turbines and Substation..30 8.3 Gullen WEF and a New South Wales – Victoria comparison…..……………………………………………… 32 8.4 Some BHWEF impacts on local flora and fauna…….. 33 9. A Commonwealth Wind Energy Regulator…………………….. 35 10. References…………………………………………………………... 37 11. Appendices………………………………………………………….. 38 Front Cover (p 3): (Unauthorised) BHWEF Civil Design Plans (As Built), northern sector, December 2013 4 1. About TVCG Inc. TVCG Inc. was formed and incorporated in 2002 by residents of the Bald Hills/Tarwin Lower region in South Gippsland, Victoria. It is a voluntary, not-for-profit association focused on environmental conservation and protection of the lower Tarwin River valley and nearby coastline. TVCG’s Statement of Purposes is: • To promote the protection and conservation of the natural environment of the Tarwin Valley region on public and private lands including its coastline, parks, conservation and reserve areas, remnant vegetation and waterways; • To lobby all levels of government to resource the extension of conservation areas and to maintain and protect existing designated conservation and reserve areas; • To encourage local residents and visitors to value the natural environment of the Tarwin Valley region; • To form alliances with other conservation organisations and/or community based groups to progress matters compatible with the purposes of this Association; • From time to time to adopt and employ such other strategies which may enhance or progress the protection and conservation of the natural environment of the Tarwin Valley region . Most TVCG members are local farmers and landowners with a strong environmental and conservation ethic pre-dating the formation of the association. Our members established Friends of the Cape Liptrap Peninsula including the Bald Hills and Kings Flat Reserves . Many of us are also active and committed members of our local LandCare group. 2. Site and surrounds of the BHWEF Section 1 of the TVCG Part B SubReport provides a detailed description of the environmental context of the BHWEF. Residents and local landowners are strongly attuned to the natural beauty and conservation values of our ‘Prom Territory’ neighbourhood and consider we are fortunate to be its custodians and carers. While bush clearing was a pre-requisite of land ownership imposed by the late 1940s Victorian government, Shire of Woorayl, and Rural Development Bank, our families left intact significant tracts of remnant vegetation. These continue to provide habitat for flora and fauna. Over the decades we have preserved these by using sensitive farming practices, supplementing these with plantings and looking after our area’s dedicated conservation reserves. The 2004 Planning Panel described some of our efforts thus: ‘astonishing quantities of native plantings had taken place’. 1 The ridge, upon which the northern section of BHWEF now stands, rises above the larger Tullaree wetland. Historically, this area is rich in biodiversity. Despite drainage works, the wetland still fills up in winter providing important habitat for many faunal species. These include species deemed to be matters of national environmental significance under the Commonwealth’s Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act, 1 2004 Bald Hills Wind Farm Project EES, EES Supplement and Called In Permits Report, 24 June 2004 p 212 5 including migratory birds. The southern section of the BHWEF is one kilometre or so from the coastline and directly abuts the Cape Liptrap national park. Taken together with its close proximity to the coastline, the area provided a rich food source for Gunnai-Kurnai and Bunurong peoples. Not surprisingly, the 1763 hectares used for the BHWEF are scattered with aboriginal archaeology including human grave sites. There are twenty three residential properties at or within two kilometres of the BHWEF, and between eight -eleven 2 other properties directly adjoining the BHWEF entitled to house sites, by right of Victorian and South Gippsland Shire planning schemes. Five of the twenty three residential properties belong to landowners participating as ‘stakeholders’ in the BHWEF development. Two ‘stakeholder’ property owners currently live in situ. 3. Details of the BHWEF The BHWEF comprises 52 RePower MM 92 turbines. The hub height of each tower is 80 metres with a rotor tip height of 124.75 metres. Each turbine consists of a tower and a 3-bladed rotor (92.5 metres diameter) standing on a reinforced concrete foundation. The tower is made of welded steel segments. Each turbine nacelle, rotor, and hub weighs 96.5 tonnes 3. The turbines are rated to generate 2.05 MW. All turbine componentry is fully imported. The BHWEF Planning Permit was first issued referring to the use of Repower MM 82 turbines which are smaller and shorter than the MM92 model. In 2009, the Minister for Planning approved a secondary consent application by the developer to change the turbine model. BHWEF is not the first WEF in Gippsland4 however, to date, it is the largest. Services to the BHWEF include more than twenty seven kilometres of internal roads, a laydown area for each turbine, a substation measuring 100 metres by 50 metres, an underground electrical cabling system, a 30+ kilometre transmission line to Leongatha South grid connection, a ‘met mast’, and various temporary buildings and services associated with construction. The main entrance is accessed from Buffalo-Waratah Road, Tarwin Lower. This $400million project has a very considerable construction footprint.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gippsland Roadmap
    9 Dec 2019 The Energy Innovation Foreword Co-operative1, which has 10 years of experience On behalf of the Victorian Government, I am pleased to present the Victorian Regional Renewable Energy Roadmaps. delivering community-based As we transition to cleaner energy with new opportunities for jobs and greater security of supply, we are looking to empower communities, accelerate renewable energy and build a more sustainable and prosperous energy efficiency and state. renewable energy initiatives in Victoria is leading the way to meet the challenges of climate change by enshrining our Victorian Renewable Energy Targets (VRET) into law: 25 per the Southern Gippsland region, cent by 2020, rising to 40 per cent by 2025 and 50 per cent by 2030. Achieving the 2030 target is expected to boost the Victorian economy by $5.8 billion - driving metro, regional and rural industry and supply chain developed this document in development. It will create around 4,000 full time jobs a year and cut power costs. partnership with Community It will also give the renewable energy sector the confidence it needs to invest in renewable projects and help Victorians take control of their energy needs. Power Agency (community Communities across Barwon South West, Gippsland, Grampians and Loddon Mallee have been involved in discussions to help define how Victoria engagement and community- transitions to a renewable energy economy. These Roadmaps articulate our regional communities’ vision for a renewable energy future, identify opportunities to attract investment and better owned renewable energy understand their community’s engagement and capacity to transition to specialists)2, Mondo renewable energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Alinta Energy Sustainability Report 2018/19
    Alinta Energy Sustainability Report 2018/19 ABN 39 149 229 998 Contents A message from our Managing Director and CEO 2 Employment 50 FY19 highlights 4 Employment at Alinta Energy 52 Key sustainability performance measures 6 Employee engagement 53 Employee data 54 Our business 8 Supporting our people 55 Offices 10 Ownership 10 Our communities 60 Where we operate 12 Community development program 62 Electricity generation portfolio 14 Employee volunteering 62 Sales and customers 17 Sponsorships, donations and partnerships 64 Vision and values 18 Excellence Awards – community contribution 64 Business structure and governance 19 Community impacts from operations 65 Executive leadership team 20 Management committees 21 Markets and customers 66 Board biographies 21 Customer service 68 Risk management and compliance 23 Branding 72 Economic health 24 New products and projects 74 Market regulation and compliance 74 Safety 26 Fusion – our transformation program 77 Safety performance 28 Safety governance 29 Our report 80 Safety and wellbeing initiatives and programs 32 Reporting principles 82 Glossary 83 Environment 34 GRI and UNSDG content index 85 Climate change and energy industry 36 Sustainability materiality assessment 88 National government programs, policies and targets 39 Deloitte Assurance Report 96 State government programs, policies and targets 40 Energy consumption and emissions 42 Our approach to renewable energy 43 Energy efficiency and emission reduction projects 45 Environmental compliance 46 Waste and water 47 Case study 48 2018/19 Alinta Energy - Sustainability Report Page 1 Changes to our vision and leadership A message My comment above on our new vision to be the best energy company sounds a little different than in the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Town and Country Planning Board of Victoria
    1965-66 VICTORIA TWENTIETH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING BOARD OF VICTORIA FOR THE PERIOD lsr JULY, 1964, TO 30rH JUNE, 1965 PRESENTED TO BOTH HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 5 (2) OF THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1961 [Appro:timate Cost of Report-Preparation, not given. Printing (225 copies), $736.00 By Authority A. C. BROOKS. GOVERNMENT PRINTER. MELBOURNE. No. 31.-[25 cents]-11377 /65. INDEX PAGE The Board s Regulations s Planning Schemes Examined by the Board 6 Hazelwood Joint Planning Scheme 7 City of Ringwood Planning Scheme 7 City of Maryborough Planning Scheme .. 8 Borough of Port Fairy Planning Scheme 8 Shire of Corio Planning Scheme-Lara Township Nos. 1 and 2 8 Shire of Sherbrooke Planning Scheme-Shire of Knox Planning Scheme 9 Eildon Reservoir .. 10 Eildon Reservoir Planning Scheme (Shire of Alexandra) 10 Eildon Reservoir Planning Scheme (Shire of Mansfield) 10 Eildon Sub-regional Planning Scheme, Extension A, 1963 11 Eppalock Planning Scheme 11 French Island Planning Scheme 12 Lake Bellfield Planning Scheme 13 Lake Buffalo Planning Scheme 13 Lake Glenmaggie Planning Scheme 14 Latrobe Valley Sub-regional Planning Scheme 1949, Extension A, 1964 15 Phillip Island Planning Scheme 15 Tower Hill Planning Scheme 16 Waratah Bay Planning Scheme 16 Planning Control for Victoria's Coastline 16 Lake Tyers to Cape Howe Coastal Planning Scheme 17 South-Western Coastal Planning Scheme (Shire of Portland) 18 South-Western Coastal Planning Scheme (Shire of Belfast) 18 South-Western Coastal Planning Scheme (Shire of Warrnambool) 18 South-Western Coastal Planning Scheme (Shire of Heytesbury) 18 South-Western Coastal Planning Scheme (Shire of Otway) 18 Wonthaggi Coastal Planning Scheme (Borough of Wonthaggi) 18 Melbourne Metropolitan Planning Scheme 19 Melbourne's Boulevards 20 Planning Control Around Victoria's Reservoirs 21 Uniform Building Regulations 21 INDEX-continued.
    [Show full text]
  • National Greenpower Accreditation Program Annual Compliance Audit
    National GreenPower Accreditation Program Annual Compliance Audit 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2007 Publisher NSW Department of Water and Energy Level 17, 227 Elizabeth Street GPO Box 3889 Sydney NSW 2001 T 02 8281 7777 F 02 8281 7799 [email protected] www.dwe.nsw.gov.au National GreenPower Accreditation Program Annual Compliance Audit 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2007 December 2008 ISBN 978 0 7347 5501 8 Acknowledgements We would like to thank the National GreenPower Steering Group (NGPSG) for their ongoing support of the GreenPower Program. The NGPSG is made up of representatives from the NSW, VIC, SA, QLD, WA and ACT governments. The Commonwealth, TAS and NT are observer members of the NGPSG. The 2007 GreenPower Compliance Audit was completed by URS Australia Pty Ltd for the NSW Department of Water and Energy, on behalf of the National GreenPower Steering Group. © State of New South Wales through the Department of Water and Energy, 2008 This work may be freely reproduced and distributed for most purposes, however some restrictions apply. Contact the Department of Water and Energy for copyright information. Disclaimer: While every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that this document is correct at the time of publication, the State of New South Wales, its agents and employees, disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of anything or the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done in reliance upon the whole or any part of this document. DWE 08_258 National GreenPower Accreditation Program Annual Compliance Audit 2007 Contents Section 1 | Introduction.......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    The Senate Select Committee on Wind Turbines Final report August 2015 Commonwealth of Australia 2015 ISBN 978-1-76010-260-9 Secretariat Ms Jeanette Radcliffe (Committee Secretary) Ms Jackie Morris (Acting Secretary) Dr Richard Grant (Principal Research Officer) Ms Kate Gauthier (Principal Research Officer) Ms Trish Carling (Senior Research Officer) Mr Tasman Larnach (Senior Research Officer) Dr Joshua Forkert (Senior Research Officer) Ms Carol Stewart (Administrative Officer) Ms Kimberley Balaga (Administrative Officer) Ms Sarah Batts (Administrative Officer) PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Phone: 02 6277 3241 Fax: 02 6277 5829 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.aph.gov.au/select_windturbines This document was produced by the Senate Select Wind Turbines Committee Secretariat and printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License. The details of this licence are available on the Creative Commons website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/ ii MEMBERSHIP OF THE COMMITTEE 44th Parliament Members Senator John Madigan, Chair Victoria, IND Senator Bob Day AO, Deputy Chair South Australia, FFP Senator Chris Back Western Australia, LP Senator Matthew Canavan Queensland, NATS Senator David Leyonhjelm New South Wales, LDP Senator Anne Urquhart Tasmania, ALP Substitute members Senator Gavin Marshall Victoria, ALP for Senator Anne Urquhart (from 18 May to 18 May 2015) Participating members for this inquiry Senator Nick Xenophon South Australia, IND Senator the Hon Doug Cameron New South Wales, ALP iii iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Membership of the Committee ........................................................................ iii Tables and Figures ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of Ordinary Meeting - 15 April 2015 Bass Coast Shire Council
    Minutes for Ordinary Meeting Wednesday, 15 April 2015 Bass Coast Shire Council Heritage Centre, 89 Thompson Avenue, Cowes 5.00pm 1. These minutes are due to be confirmed on 20 May 2015 2. Any decision included in these minutes is subject to change resulting from a rescission motion passed by Council. Minutes of Ordinary Meeting - 15 April 2015 Bass Coast Shire Council TABLE OF CONTENTS A Present and Apologies ................................................................................................. 4 B Community Question Time ........................................................................................ 5 B .1 David Hamer, on behalf of the 4Shore Sk8 Park Committee - Funding for skatepark maintenance and supervison in the Shire ...................................... 5 B.2 Maurice Schinkel, Cowes - Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission ............................................................................................................. 6 B.3 Les Larke, Wonthaggi - Wonthaggi Public Cemetery ........................................... 6 B.4 Walter Broussard, Cowes - Blue Gum Reserve ..................................................... 8 B.5 Bernie McComb, Cowes - Community Energy ...................................................... 8 B.6 Bernie McComb, Cowes - Vegetation damage ................................................... 10 B.7 Pauline Taylor, Cowes - Green waste ................................................................. 10 B.8 Maurice Schinkel, Cowes - Agenda item E.1 Amendment C134
    [Show full text]
  • Kyoto Energypark
    Kyoto energypark Appendix K(i) Duponts Property Research Land Value Impact Assessment for Kyoto Energy Park (December 2008) pamada LAND VALUE IMPACT ASSESSMENT – KYOTO ENERGY PARK KEY INSIGHTS LAND VALUE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR KYOTO ENERGY PARK Prepared for KEY INSIGHTS December 2008 1 LAND VALUE IMPACT ASSESSMENT – KYOTO ENERGY PARK KEY INSIGHTS INTRODUCTION Duponts has been engaged by Key Insights Pty Ltd to assess the impact on land values of the Kyoto Energy Park at Mountain Station and Middlebrook Station, via Scone. Duponts has made this assessment based on a review of literature on the matter, information of the development gained from the proponent, an informal inspection of the local area, our knowledge of land values in the Scone region and our knowledge of the impact developments of this nature have on land values. BACKGROUND EXISTING WIND FARMS IN NSW There are currently four wind farms operating in NSW including Blayney Wind Farm, Crookwell Wind Farm, Hampton Wind Park and Kooragang Island. In total they generate enough electricity to supply power to approximately 6,000 homes annually. Kooragang Island Crookwell Wind Farm Blayney Wind Farm Hampton Wind Park In 1997 Energy Australia installed 1 wind turbine on Kooragang Island, on the northern side of Newcastle harbour. The wind turbine provides 600kW of energy to Energy Australia’s Pure Energy customers. Crookwell Wind farm has 8 wind turbines located in the southern tablelands of NSW. Opened in 1998 it was the first grid-connected wind farm in Australia. The wind farm has a total capacity of 4.8 MW. The wind farm is currently owned by Eraring Energy.
    [Show full text]
  • NZMT-Energy-Report May 2021.Pdf
    Acknowledgements We would like to thank Monica Richter (World Wide Fund for Nature and the Science Based Targets Initiative), Anna Freeman (Clean Energy Council), and Ben Skinner and Rhys Thomas (Australian Energy Council) for kindly reviewing this report. We value the input from these reviewers but note the report’s findings and analysis are those of ClimateWorks Australia. We also thank the organisations listed for reviewing and providing feedback on information about their climate commitments and actions. This report is part of a series focusing on sectors within the Australian economy. Net Zero Momentum Tracker – an initiative of ClimateWorks Australia with the Monash Sustainable Development Institute – demonstrates progress towards net zero emissions in Australia. It brings together and evaluates climate action commitments made by Australian businesses, governments and other organisations across major sectors. Sector reports from the project to date include: property, banking, superannuation, local government, retail, transport, resources and energy. The companies assessed by the Net Zero Momentum Tracker represent 61 per cent of market capitalisation in the ASX200, and are accountable for 61 per cent of national emissions. Achieving net zero emissions prior to 2050 will be a key element of Australia’s obligations under the Paris Agreement on climate (UNFCCC 2015). The goal of the agreement is to limit global temperature rise to well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels and to strive for 1.5 degrees. 2 Overall, energy sector commitments are insufficient for Australia to achieve a Paris-aligned SUMMARY transition to net zero. Australia’s energy sector This report finds none of the companies assessed are fully aligned with the Paris climate goals, and must accelerate its pace of most fall well short of these.
    [Show full text]
  • Biomass Solar Wind Hydro
    National GreenPower Accreditation Program Annual Audit Audit Period 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2006 COMPLIANCE AUDIT hydro solar biomass wind Prepared for The National GreenPower Steering Group October 2007 National GreenPower Accreditation Program Annual Audit Audit Period 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2006 COMPLIANCE AUDIT hydro solar biomass wind Prepared for The National GreenPower Steering Group October 2007 URS Australia Pty Ltd Level 3, 116 Miller St, North Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia Phone: +61 2 8925 5500 • Fax: +61 2 8925 5555 www.ap.urscorp.com Contents 1 Introduction-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1-1 1.1 Background 1-1 1.2 Audit Scope 1-1 1.3 Audit Methodology 1-1 1.4 Limitations and Exceptions 1-2 1.5 Structure of this Report 1-3 1.6 List of Abbreviations 1-3 2 National GreenPower Accreditation Program 2006--------------------------------------------------------2-1 2.1 Overview 2-1 2.1.1 GreenPower Products 2-1 2.1.2 Rules of the Program 2-2 2.1.3 Mandatory Renewable Energy Target 2-2 2.1.4 NSW Greenhouse Gas Reduction Scheme (GGAS) 2-2 2.1.5 GreenPower Generators 2-3 2.2 Participation 2-4 2.2.1 Reporting Period 2-4 2.2.2 GreenPower Product Providers/Products 2-4 2.3 Changes to GreenPower Products 2-5 2.3.1 GreenPower Customers 2-7 2.4 GreenPower Purchases and Sales 2-11 2.4.1 GreenPower Events, Events Customers and Events Sales 2-13 2.4.2 GreenPower Generation Sources 2-13 2.5 Energy from ‘Existing’ and ‘New’ GreenPower Generators 2-14 2.5.1
    [Show full text]
  • Westwind Energy Pty Ltd GOLDEN PLAINS WIND FARM
    GOLDEN PLAINS WIND FARM ENVIRONMENT EFFECTS STATEMENT EXPERT EVIDENCE OF BRETT LANE WestWind Energy Pty Ltd Suite 5, 61–63 Camberwell Road, Hawthorn VIC 3123 P.O. Box 337, Camberwell VIC 3124 Ph. (03) 9815 2111 Fax. (03) 9815 2685 20th July 2018 Report No.16064 (7.4) Golden Plains Wind Farm – Biodiversity Assessment Report No. 16064 (7.4) CONTENTS 1. WITNESS DETAILS ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Name and address .................................................................................................. 1 1.2. Area of expertise ...................................................................................................... 1 2. SCOPE ............................................................................................................................... 2 2.1. Relevant survey guidelines ...................................................................................... 2 2.2. Investigations undertaken for the EES ................................................................... 3 2.3. Additional Investigations and Discussions ............................................................. 6 2.4. Environment Effects Statement .............................................................................. 7 2.5. Results of Additional Investigations and Discussions ........................................... 7 3. RESPONSE TO SUBMISSIONS ......................................................................................... 9 3.1. DELWP
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Farm Collision Risk for Birds
    Wind farm collision risk for birds Cumulative risks for threatened and migratory species Swift Parrot White-bellied Sea-Eagle Orange-bellied Parrot Tasmanian Wedge-tailed Eagle Images: Dave Watts Prepared for the Australian Government Department of the Environment and Heritage by Biosis Research Pty Ltd Introduction Assessing the impact of wind farm technology on native Australian birds has, to date, generally focused on the impact any individual wind farm may have on a protected species. This method of assessment, however, may only provide part of the broader picture where a bird species has a wide distribution, may fly over long distances, and be subject to the impacts of collisions at multiple wind farms. In 2005, Biosis Research Pty Ltd was contracted by the Australian Government to develop a means of modelling the predicted cumulative risks posed to birds from collisions with turbines at multiple wind farms. Cumulative risk modelling was then undertaken for four endangered species of birds: the Orange-bellied Parrot, the Tasmanian Wedge-tailed Eagle, the Swift Parrot and the Australian population of the White-bellied Sea-eagle. The risk of collision for a number of other birds and a bat species was also modelled, focusing on wind farm developments in Gippsland, Victoria. The study centres on threatened and migratory species under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. It provides an overview of the cumulative models that have been developed and an explanation of the rationale that underlies these processes. The capacities and limitations of the modelling are also outlined, as well as some recommendations provided to improve the knowledge base required to make the modelling process more widely applicable.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Assessment of the Impact of Wind Farms on Surrounding Land Values in Australia, NSW Valuer
    PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF WIND FARMS ON SURROUNDING LAND VALUES IN AUSTRALIA NSW DEPARTMENT OF LANDS PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF WIND FARMS ON SURROUNDING LAND VALUES IN AUSTRALIA Prepared for: NSW Valuer General August 2009 RESEARCH REPORT 1 PRP REF: M.6777 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF WIND FARMS ON SURROUNDING LAND VALUES IN AUSTRALIA NSW DEPARTMENT OF LANDS CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY _____________________________________________________________ 2 1. INTRODUCTION ______________________________________________________________ 3 2. CONTEXT ___________________________________________________________________ 4 3. LITERATURE REVIEW _________________________________________________________ 5 4. METHODOLOGY _____________________________________________________________ 12 5. RESULTS ___________________________________________________________________ 16 6. DISCUSSION ________________________________________________________________ 54 7. REFERENCES _______________________________________________________________ 56 RESEARCH REPORT 1 PRP REF: M.6777 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF WIND FARMS ON SURROUNDING LAND VALUES IN AUSTRALIA NSW DEPARTMENT OF LANDS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The aim of this study was to conduct a preliminary assessment on the impacts of wind farms on surrounding land values in Australia, mainly through the analysis of property sales transaction data. This included consideration of the contribution of various factors (including distance to a wind farm, view of a wind farm, and land use) to
    [Show full text]