DOCSLIB.ORG

NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NPS Form 10-5 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NPS Form 10-5 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NPS Form 10-5 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-S OMBNo. 1024-0018 VILLAGE OF MARIEMONT Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: Village of Mariemont Other Name/Site Number: None 2. LOCATION Street & Number: Not for publication: N/A Located ten miles east of downtown Cincinnati, Ohio, bordering both sides of US 50 (Wooster Pike); bounded by Westover industrial section, Beech Street, Murray Avenue, Grove Avenue, Pocahontas Avenue, Miami Bluff Drive, and acreage south of Norfolk & Western rail lines. City/Town: Mariemont Vicinity: N/A_ State: Ohio County: Hamilton Code: 061 Zip Code: 45227 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: X__ Building(s): __ Public-Local: X District: X Public-State: ___ Site: __ Public-Federal: Structure: __ Object:__ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 1014 57 buildings 09 0_ sites 3_ structures 2 0_ objects 1030 Total 60 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 182 Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: Historic Residential Suburbs in the United States, 1830 to 1960, MPS NPS Form 10-5 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-S OMBNo. 1024-0018 VILLAGE OF MARIEMONT Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this ___ nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ___ meets ___ does not meet the National Register Criteria. Signature of Certifying Official Date State or Federal Agency and Bureau In my opinion, the property ___ meets ___ does not meet the National Register criteria. Signature of Commenting or Other Official Date State or Federal Agency and Bureau 5. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this property is: Entered in the National Register Determined eligible for the National Register Determined not eligible for the National Register Removed from the National Register Other (explain): Signature of Keeper Date of Action NFS Form 10-5 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-S OMBNo. 1024-0018 VILLAGE OF MARIEMONT Page 3 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 6. FUNCTION OR USE Historic: Domestic Sub: Single Dwelling Domestic Sub: Multiple Dwelling Domestic Sub: Secondary Structure Domestic Sub: Hotel Commerce Sub: Business Commerce Sub: Professional Commerce Sub: Financial Institution Commerce Sub: Restaurant Commerce Sub: Trade (Archeology) Social Sub: Meeting Hall Government Sub: Fire/Police Station Education Sub: School Religion Sub: Religious Facility Funerary Sub: Cemetery Funerary Sub: Graves/Burials Recreation/Culture Sub: Theatre Recreation/Culture Sub: Sports Facility Recreation/Culture Sub: Outdoor Recreation Recreation/Culture Sub: Monument/Marker Recreation/Culture Sub: Work of art Agriculture/ Sub si stence Sub: Agricultural Outbuilding Agriculture/ Sub si stence Sub: Agricultural Industry/Processing Sub: Manufacturing Facility Industry/Processing Sub: Industrial Storage Landscape Sub: Park Landscape Sub: Plaza Landscape Sub: Garden Landscape Sub: Forest Landscape Sub: Street Furniture Landscape Sub: Conservation Area Transportation Sub: Road-related (vehicular) Current: Domestic Sub: Single Dwelling Domestic Sub: Multiple Dwelling NFS Form 10-5 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-S OMBNo. 1024-0018 VILLAGE OF MARIEMONT Page 4 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form Domestic Sub: Secondary Structure Domestic Sub: Hotel Commerce Sub: Business Commerce Sub: Professional Commerce Sub: Specialty Store Commerce Sub: Restaurant Commerce Sub: Financial institution Government Sub: Government Office Government Sub: Fire/Police Station Education Sub: School Education Sub: Library Religion Sub: Religious Facility Funerary Sub: Cemetery Funerary Sub: Graves/Burials Recreation and Culture Sub: Theatre Recreation and Culture Sub: Sports Facility Recreation and Culture Sub: Outdoor Recreation Recreation and Culture Sub: Monument/Marker Recreation and Culture Sub: Work of art Agriculture/ Sub si stence Sub: Agricultural outbuilding Agriculture/ Sub si stence Sub: Agricultural Industry/Processing Sub: Manufacturing facility Industry/Processing Sub: Industrial storage Health Care Sub: Medical business/office Landscape Sub: Park Landscape Sub: Plaza Landscape Sub: Garden Landscape Sub: Forest Landscape Sub: Street furniture Landscape Sub: Conservation area Transportation Sub: Road related (vehicular) NPS Form 10-5 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-S OMBNo. 1024-0018 VILLAGE OF MARIEMONT Page 5 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 7. DESCRIPTION Architectural Classification: Early Republic Federal Early 19th & 20th Century Revivals Tudor Revival Colonial Revival Italian Renaissance Revival Late 19l & early 20 century American Movements Bungalow/Craftsman Modern Movement Art Deco MATERIALS: Entries on following pages in this section provide specific descriptions of properties and structures. Materials described below provide a general listing of materials for buildings documented. Foundation: Stone, concrete, brick Walls: Stone, brick, stucco, wood Roof: Asphalt, metal, stone Other: NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-S OMBNo. 1024-0018 VILLAGE OF MARIEMONT Page 6 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form Summary Distinctive for its cohesive plan that incorporates both formal and informal elements and its overall landscape design that encompasses a network of parks and tree-lined streets and avenues, the Village of Mariemont is an outstanding model of American garden-city design (1920-1962). The work of preeminent and pioneering American planner and garden-city practitioner John Nolen and his associate Philip Foster, the village is the most complete, comprehensive, and intact example of Nolen's community designs. Stemming from the financial support and like-minded vision of Cincinnati philanthropist Mary Emery and her advisor Charles Livingood, the community also represents one of the nation's most notable philanthropic efforts to relieve the housing shortage after World War I and to provide a model for reforming the character of American housing and neighborhoods for working-class families. Emery and Livingood envisioned a well-balanced community that offered a variety of attractive, modestly priced rental units; a wide range of well-constructed, architect-designed single family homes; and neighborhood amenities such as streetcar transportation to downtown Cincinnati, parks for recreation and inspiration, schools, a church, tree-lined roads and avenues, and a range of recreational facilities. Originally promoted as a "national exemplar" of domestic design, the village exhibits a variety of twentieth century housing types—groups of attached houses, apartment buildings, duplexes, and detached homes— primarily in the Tudor Revival and Colonial Revival styles. The earliest housing groups built in the 1920s are the work of American architects whom Livingood carefully selected with Nolen's recommendations. Among these architects were nationally recognized architects from New York, Boston, and Philadelphia, whose reputations in domestic design were well established, including Grosvenor Atterbury, Richard B. Dana, Edmund B. Gilchrist, Lois L. Howe, Louis E. Jallade, Eleanor Manning, and Carl A. Ziegler. It was also the proving ground for a number of Cincinnati architects, especially Charles A. Cellarius, whose designs and role as Mariemont's Resident Architect gained him national recognition and an invitation to serve on the Committee for House Design at the 1931 President's Conference on Home Building and Home Ownership, a landmark event in the history of America's suburbanization. Viewed as a whole, Mariemont's dwellings provide a revealing index of domestic design as practiced in the United States between 1920 and 1960 and an indicator of the changing methods and materials of construction and garden design that marked the evolution of suburban housing in the twentieth century. The Village of Mariemont possesses an unusually high degree of historic integrity. This is evident in the nearly complete and intact character of the community plans designed by John Nolen in the 1920s and executed under the leadership of Mary Emery, Charles Livingood, and the Mariemont Company. It is also evident in the pervasive park-like ambience, the streets lined with mature trees, home plantings of shrubbery and shade trees, and ingenious layout of streets that integrate the radial geometry of formal planning and the informality of naturalistic curvilinear streets. And finally it is evident in the siting, setting, architectural character, and relatively unaltered condition of detached, semi-detached and apartment houses as well as commercial
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 208-10 REX AVE Name of Resource: William L
    ADDRESS: 208-10 REX AVE Name of Resource: William L. Hirst-H. Louis Duhring Residence Proposed Action: Designation Property Owner: Virginia, William, and Hewson Baltzell Nominator: Chestnut Hill Conservancy Staff Contact: Laura DiPasquale, [email protected] OVERVIEW: This nomination proposes to designate the property at 208-10 Rex Avenue in Chestnut Hill and list it on the Philadelphia Register of Historic Places. The nomination argues that the house, constructed about 1857-60, with alterations around 1893 and a substantial rear addition in 1927, satisfies Criteria for Designation A, C, and E. Under Criterion A, the nomination contends that the property has significant character as one of the early prominent suburban villas constructed in the first period of the development of the suburban character of the Chestnut Hill section of the city after the extension of the first railroad to the area. The nomination also argues that the building is significant under Criterion A for its association with architect H. Louis Duhring, who owned and lived in the house between 1919 and 1946, and under Criterion E as a representative example of Duhring’s influential architectural work. The nomination also contends that the property is significant under Criterion C as reflecting the environment of both the period of its original Italianate construction and its Arts and Crafts addition. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the nomination demonstrates that the property at 208-10 Rex Avenue satisfies Criteria for Designation A, C, and E. ADDITIONAL MAPS: Figure 1: Detail of 1876 City Atlas of Philadelphia, 22nd Ward, Plate C. Source: Free Library of Philadelphia.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Neolithic and chalcolithic cultures in Turkish Thrace Erdogu, Burcin How to cite: Erdogu, Burcin (2001) Neolithic and chalcolithic cultures in Turkish Thrace, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/3994/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk NEOLITHIC AND CHALCOLITHIC CULTURES IN TURKISH THRACE Burcin Erdogu Thesis Submitted for Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. University of Durham Department of Archaeology 2001 Burcin Erdogu PhD Thesis NeoHthic and ChalcoHthic Cultures in Turkish Thrace ABSTRACT The subject of this thesis are the NeoHthic and ChalcoHthic cultures in Turkish Thrace. Turkish Thrace acts as a land bridge between the Balkans and Anatolia.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology Activity Pack
    Archaeology activity pack Primary KS2 Stone Age to Iron Age 1 All images and content © Museum of London 2015. This sheet is designed to be edited by teachers. The museum cannot take responsibility for edited content. How does archaeology help us understand what life was like in prehistory? This series of activities looks at how archaeologists record and interpret objects to inform our understanding about life in the past. Pupils will: use clues to sort artefacts into categories consider how and why an archaeologist records accurately where things are found use images of artefacts to think about how groups of objects can give us information about the past suggest reasons why some of our activities leave traces when others do not consolidate prior learning about Stone Age hunter-gatherers understand that there were people living here before London existed. Activity 1 Sort it! Identifying different flint tools Activity 2 The archaeological jigsaw What can we learn from a group of objects? Activity 3 Case study: Three Ways Wharf Hunter-gatherers in Uxbridge Activity 4 Leaving traces Make a Stone Age tool Activity 5 Dig it! Archaeological dig record and field journal worksheets 2 All images and content © Museum of London 2015. This sheet is designed to be edited by teachers. The museum cannot take responsibility for edited content. Activity 1 Sort it! Identifying different flint tools Introduction Begin by showing your pupils a selection of brushes; a toothbrush, a dustpan and brush, a hairbrush, a paintbrush and a floor brush. Ask pupils: What do all these objects have in common? What is each one is used for? Although all the objects are brushes, they are all used to perform different tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric ·Art of the Central Coast of British Columbia ROY L
    CHAPTER 7 Prehistoric ·Art of the Central Coast of British Columbia ROY L. CARLSON glance at any Northwest Coast art book attests firmly to the existence of a highly developed tradi­ A tion of painting and carving wood during the nineteenth century by the ancestors of the Bella Bella and Bella Coola peoples of the central coast of British Columbia. Similarly, examination of the journals of Sir Alexander Mackenzie and George Vancouver carries this tradition backward into the last decades of the eighteenth century. The reading of Mcllwraith's, The Bella Coo/a Indians (1948), or Boas', Mythology of the Bella Coo/a (1900b) and Bella Bella Tales (1932), provides some insights into the meaning of this art in the cultures which produced it. But what of the decades, centuries and millenia which preceded both the early explorers and the later ethnographers? What art was produced Fig. 7:1. Whalebone pendant resembling a rockfish from then? What techniques were employed and what styles the site of Namu dating to about 3,500 years ago. were produced? What was the meaning of this art and what were its historical relationships? This paper is directed toward answering these questions, even though in wood. At the bottom-the beginning of time for this in spite of the considerable archaeological research over part of the world-archaeological evidence comes from the last fourteen years, the data base is still very much a single component at the site of Namu (ElSx 1). The limited. assemblage from the basal levels of this site is a chipped stone industry with relationships to both the Pebble Tool Tradition and the Microblade Tradition (Ch.
    [Show full text]
  • Metate Re-Roughening, Pecking, Or Pounding?
    PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF A REPLICATNE STUDY: METATE RE-ROUGHENING, PECKING, OR POUNDING? Dawn M. Reid and Mari A. Pritchard-Parker Department of Anthropology University of California Riverside, CA 92521 ABSTRACT This paper discusses the results of a replicative study on the roughening of milling equipment, specifically metates. The intent of the replication was to ascertain ifdiffering results were achieved when various percussor types were used to re-roughen a metate-like surface. Hammerstones prepared by flaking and unmodified cobbles were utilized. The results obtained in the replication were then compared with archaeological specimens in an attempt to determine more information as to the manufacturing and use behaviors associated with milling equipment. INTRODUCTION ment would be most efficiently accom­ plished with tools of different shapes and Stone metates or grinding stones have sizes, depending upon how much mass one long been a primary food processing tool for is trying to remove and where that mass is many agricultural as well as hunting and located. Where manufacture seeks to re­ gathering societies. Use of these imple­ move a relatively large amount ofmass, re­ ments to reduce both plant and animal ma­ roughening seeks to merely mar the grind­ terial has been well documented. When a ing surface to such a degree that it becomes metate is used in conjunction with a mano useful again. Identifying potential differ­ to grind foodstuffs, sharp edges are sheared ences in the types of tools used in the manu­ off ofthe metate surface and residues from facture and maintenance ofmilling imple­ the material being ground are deposited.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Code Title Date Start Time CE Hours Description Tour Format
    Tour Program Code Title Date Start Time CE Hours Description Accessibility Format ET101 Historic Boathouse Row 05/18/16 8:00 a.m. 2.00 LUs/GBCI Take an illuminating journey along Boathouse Row, a National Historic District, and tour the exteriors of 15 buildings dating from Bus and No 1861 to 1998. Get a firsthand view of a genuine labor of Preservation love. Plus, get an interior look at the University Barge Club Walking and the Undine Barge Club. Tour ET102 Good Practice: Research, Academic, and Clinical 05/18/16 9:00 a.m. 1.50 LUs/HSW/GBCI Find out how the innovative design of the 10-story Smilow Center for Translational Research drives collaboration and accelerates Bus and Yes SPaces Work Together advanced disease discoveries and treatment. Physically integrated within the University of Pennsylvania’s Perelman Center for Walking Advanced Medicine and Jordan Center for Medical Education, it's built to train the next generation of Physician-scientists. Tour ET103 Longwood Gardens’ Fountain Revitalization, 05/18/16 9:00 a.m. 3.00 LUs/HSW/GBCI Take an exclusive tour of three significant historic restoration and exPansion Projects with the renowned architects and Bus and No Meadow ExPansion, and East Conservatory designers resPonsible for them. Find out how each Professional incorPorated modern systems and technologies while Walking Plaza maintaining design excellence, social integrity, sustainability, land stewardshiP and Preservation, and, of course, old-world Tour charm. Please wear closed-toe shoes and long Pants. ET104 Sustainability Initiatives and Green Building at 05/18/16 10:30 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Glaciation (Oakley, 1950). Variations in the Proposed Beginning Dates
    EVOLUTION OF THE HUMAN HAND AMD THE GREAT HAND-AXE TRADITION Grover S. Krantz The hand-axe is both the earliest and the longest persisting of standar- dized stone tools. They present a continuous history of one tool type from the first to the third interglacial periods, a span.of at least 200,000 years and perhaps as many as half a million. Equally remarkable is their geographical range which covers all of Africa, western Europe and southern Asia--fully half of-the then habitable Old Vorld. Aside from differences in the local stone that was utilized, hand-axes from this whole area are constructed on the same plan and show no clear regional typology. Other tool types occur with hand-axes: utilized flakes are found at all levels, and in the later half of the sequence there-are cleavers, ovates, trimmed flakes and spherical stone balls. Throughout the sequence, however, the basic design of the hand-axe continues with its intended formnapparently unchanged. We thus have a continuous record of man's attempts to produce a single type of 'implement over mst of his tool making history. (See Figure 1.) Recent discoveries of fossil man have made it increasingly evident that biological evolution of the human body was also in progress coincident with the development of ancient stone tool types. 'While the exact time of appearance of Homo siens is still in some dispute (see Stewart, 1950 and Oakley., 1957), it is no nowseriously maintained that the earliest tool makers necessarily approximated the modern or even the neanderthal morphologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Stone Age Technology
    World’s Early People DIGGING UP DNA STONE AGE TECHNOLOGY IN PARTNERSHIP WITH Worlds_Early_People_FC.indd 1 2/7/17 11:22 AM 2 Who Lived in the Stone Age? When you think of “old,” what comes to But they helped hominins to thrive. mind? Last year’s shoes? Life before the The first species to make tools is from the Internet? Try a little earlier – 2.5 million genus (category) we call Homo (human). It years earlier! is known as Homo habilis, or “handy That’s about the time some of the first person.” It most likely lived in Africa 1.5 hominins, or humanlike species that walk to 2.4 million years ago. Homo habilis upright, started making tools from rocks. represented a big change. How big? Big Their tools were simple – mainly stones enough that we call its time the Paleolithic split to form a point or a sharp edge. era, or the Old Stone Age. l THE BRAINS ability to make of Homo habilis and use tools. were about Homo habilis’s half the size of tools and brain- present-day human power helped it brains. However, spread. Over the brains of Homo millennia, it habilis were larger adapted, or made than the brains changes that of the hominins helped it survive, to that came before live in regions that it. This may have earlier species had contributed to its found too harsh. d HOMO ERECTUS, or early as 2.5 million communities, hunt “upright person,” years ago, Homo for food, create art, was probably a lot erectus was at its and control fire like Homo habilis, peak about 1.9 for warmth and but taller and thin- million years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • I 2 1994 National Register of Historic Places Registration Form Interagency Resources Division National Park Somcf
    NPS Form 10-900 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service I 2 1994 NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM INTERAGENCY RESOURCES DIVISION NATIONAL PARK SOMCF . J. , , This form is for use in nominating or requesti nations___ for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete n"eNational Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Hillandale (Main Residence and Gatehouse) other names/site number 2. Location street & number Main Residence; 3905 Mansion Court. N.W. Gatehouse; 3905 Reservoir Road. N.W. city _ Washington _ state District of Columbia code DC zip code 20007 county N/A code N/A vicinity X not for publication N/A 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets __ does not meet the National Register Criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Against All Odds MIT's Pioneering Women of Landscape Architecture
    Against all Odds MIT’s Pioneering Women of Landscape Architecture * Eran Ben-Joseph, Holly D. Ben-Joseph, Anne C. Dodge1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, School of Architecture and Planning, City Design and Development Group 77 Massachusetts Ave. 10-485 Cambridge, MA 02139 1 November 2006 * Recipient of the 6th Milka Bliznakov Prize Commendation: International Archive of Women in Architecture (IAWA) This research is aimed at exposing the influential, yet little known and short-lived landscape architecture program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) between 1900 and 1909. Not only was it one of only two professional landscape architecture education programs in the United States at the time (the other one at Harvard also started at 1900), but the first and only one to admit both women and men. Women students were attracted to the MIT option because it provided excellent opportunities, which they were denied elsewhere. Harvard, for example did not admit women until 1942 and all-women institutions such as the Cambridge School or the Cornell program were established after the MIT program was terminated. Unlike the other schools of that time, the MIT program did not keep women from the well-known academic leaders and male designers of the time nor from their male counterparts. At MIT, women had the opportunity to study directly with Beaux-Art design pioneers such as Charles S. Sargent, Guy Lowell, Désiré Despradelle, and the revered department head Francis Ward Chandler. Historical accounts acknowledged that a woman could “put herself through a stiff course” at MIT including advance science and structural engineering instruction.
    [Show full text]
  • THE Ambrkian Arciiitectcrat' Fotjndatlon
    THE AMBRKiAN ARCIIITECTCRAt' FOtJNDATlON "That Exceptional One: Women in American Architecture, 1888-1988" is organized and circulated by the American Architectural j Foundation and the AIA Women in Architecture Committee. The exhibition will premiere on • May 15,1988, at die AIA National Convention | and Design Exposition in New York City before traveling nationwide during its three-year tour. The American Institute of Architects, founded in 1857, is a voluntary not-for-profit member- i ship organization representing more than 54,000 architects and architectural profession- i als in nearly 300 state societies and local chapters stretching from Maine to Guam. The mission of the American Architectural ] Foundation, the publicly oriented arm of the ( AIA, is to advance the quality of American j architecture by stimulating the public's aware- ness and understanding of architecture and its related arts. "I cannot, in whole conscience, recommend architecture as a profession for girls. I know some women who have done well at it, but the obstacles are so great that it takes an exceptional girl to make a go of it. If she insisted on becoming an architect, I would try to dissuade her. If then, she was still determined, I would give her my blessing—she could be that exceptional one." Pietro Belluschi, EilA, 1972AIA Gold Medalist, from the 1955New York Life Insurance Company brochure, "Should You Be an Architect?" Contents 5 A Message from the President of The American Institute of Architects 6 A Message from the Chair of the AIA Women in Architecture Committee 7 Preface 9 "That Exceptional One: Women in American Architecture, 1888-1988" 27 AIA Archive of Women in Architecture 41 Selected Bibliography WHHW A Message from the President of The American Institute of Architects The American Institute of Architects is priv- past decade alone, reflecting the priority placed ileged to sponsor this major national exhibi- by the AIA to breaking down once and for all tion on the history of women in architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistory of the Northwest Coast ROY L
    CHAPTER 1 Prehistory of the Northwest Coast ROY L. CARLSON n the beginning there was ice ... in the end there were ice. Sub-arctic and then temperate fauna spread into this approximately 100,000 Indian people living along the new found land. Man was part of this fauna; he preyed IPacific coast from southeast Alaska to the mouth of on the other animals for food and used their hides for the Columbia River in Oregon ... in between is the pre­ clothing. He arrived by different routes, and brought historic period, the time span of the unknown, between with him different cultural traditions. By 10,000 years the retreat of the last continental glacier and the arrival ago ice only existed in the mountain top remnants we of the first Europeans with their notebooks and artist's still see today. sketches who ushered in the period of written history. The Northwest Coast (Fig. 1:1) is a ribbon of green, The prehistoric period here lasted from perhaps 12,000 wet forested land which hugs the Pacific coast of North years ago to the late 1700's when Cook, Vancouver, America from the mouth of the Copper River in Alaska Mackenzie and others began writing about the area and to just below the mouth of the Klamath River in northwest its inhabitants. Glacial geology suggests that the coast California. It was part of the "Salmon Area" of early was ice free by 12,000 years ago, but there remains the ethnographers and its cultures were clearly different possibility of even earlier movements of peoples whose from those of the California acorn area, the agricultural traces were wiped out by the last glacial advance.
    [Show full text]