Evolution of Reptiles

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evolution of Reptiles Evolution of Reptiles: Reptiles were 1st vertebrates to make a complete transition to life on land (more food & space) Arose from ancestral reptile group called cotylosaurs (small, lizard like reptile) Cotylosaurs adapted to other environments in Permian period 1. Pterosaurs – flying reptiles 2. Ichthyosaurs & plesiosaurs – marine reptiles 3. Thecodonts – small, land reptiles that walked on back legs Mesozoic Era called “age of reptiles” Dinosaurs dominated life on land for 160 million years Brachiosaurs were largest dinosaurs Herbivores included Brontosaurus & Diplodocus, while Tyrannosaurus were carnivores Dinosaurs became extinct at end of Cretaceous period Mass extinction of many animal species possibly due to impact of huge asteroid with earth; Asteroid Impact Theory Amniote (shelled) egg allowed reptiles to live & reproduce on land Amniote Egg: Egg had protective membranes & porous shell enclosing the embryo Has 4 specialized membranes — amnion, yolk sac, allantois, & chorion Amnion is a thin membrane surrounding a salty fluid in which the embryo “floats” Yolk sac encloses the yolk or protein-rich food supply for embryo Allantois stores nitrogenous wastes made by embryo until egg hatches Chorion lines the inside of the shell & regulates oxygen & carbon dioxide exchange Shell leathery & waterproof Internal fertilization occurs in female before shell is formed Terrestrial Adaptations: Dry, watertight skin covered by scales made of a protein called keratin to prevent desiccation (water loss) Toes with claws to dig & climb Geckos have toes modified into suction cups to aid climbing Snakes use scales & well developed muscular & skeletal systems to move Lungs for respiration Double circulation of blood through heart to increase oxygen to cells Partial separation in ventricle to separate oxygenated & deoxygenated blood Ectothermic – body temperature controlled by environment May bask or lie in sun to raise body temperature or seek shade to lower body temperature; known as thermoregulation Water conserved as nitrogen wastes excreted in dry, paste like form of uric acid crystals EXTINCT REPTILES Ever since the dinosaurs died off 65 million years ago, reptiles have had it relatively easy in the extinction department, not nearly as susceptible to environmental changes as birds, mammals, and amphibians. Regardless, there have been snakes, turtles, lizards, and crocodiles that have gone extinct in historical times. Jamaican Giant Galliwasp It sounds like something from a story, but the Jamaican giant galliwasp was a species of anguid lizard known as Celestus occiduus. Galliwasps (mostly belonging to a related genus, Diploglossus) can be found all over the Caribbean—there are variants native to Cuba, Puerto Rico, and Costa Rica—but the Jamaican giant galliwasp never quite came to terms with civilization and was last seen alive in the 1840s. Galliwasps are mysterious, secretive creatures that mainly hunt at night, so there's still a lot we don't know about their resiliency to ecological pressure. Round Island Burrowing Boa The Round Island burrowing boa is a bit of a misnomer: In fact, this 3- foot-long snake used to be native to the Indian Ocean island of Mauritius (where the dodo had gone extinct a few centuries before) and was only pushed out to the much smaller Round Island thanks to the depredations of human settlers and their pets. The last known sighting of the shy, gentle, euphoniously named Round Island burrowing boa was in 1996; by then, erosion of this snake's natural habitat by invasive goats and rabbits had spelled its doom. Cape Verde Giant Skink Skinks—not to be confused with skunks—are the world's most diverse lizards, flourishing in deserts, mountains, and polar regions. Still, individual skink species are every bit as vulnerable to destruction as any other type of animal, as evidenced by the early 20th-century disappearance of the Cape Verde giant skink, Chioninia cocteri. This species was unable to adapt either to the resident humans of the Cape Verde Islands, who prized this reptile for its valuable "skink oil," or to the relentless desertification of its natural habitat. Kawekaweau The largest gecko that ever lived, the 2-foot-long kawekaweau (you may find it easier to refer to it by an alternate name, Delcourt's giant gecko) was native to New Zealand, but human settlers drove it to extinction in the late 19th century. The last known kawekaweau was killed by a Maori chieftain around 1873. He didn't bring the body back with him as evidence, but his detailed description of the reptile was enough to convince naturalists that he had made a genuine sighting. (The name kawekaweau, by the way, refers to a mythical Maori forest lizard.) Rodrigues Giant Tortoise Rodrigues giant tortoises came in two varieties, both of which disappeared around the turn of the 19th century: the domed tortoise Cylindraspis peltastes, which only weighed about 25 pounds and barely meriting the adjective "giant" and the saddle-backed tortoise, Cylindraspis vosmaeri, which was substantially bigger. Both of these testudines lived on the island of Rodrigues, located about 350 miles east of Mauritius in the Indian Ocean, and both were hunted to extinction by human settlers, who must have been amused by these turtles' social behavior (slow-moving herds of the saddle-backed tortoises numbered in the thousands. Martinique Giant Ameiva The Martinique giant ameiva, Pholidoscelis major, was a slender, 18- inch-long lizard characterized by its pointy head and forked snakelike tongue. Ameivas can be found all over South and Central America as well as the Caribbean, but not on the island of Martinique, where the resident species has long been extinct. There's speculation that the Martinique giant ameiva may have been doomed not by human settlers but by a hurricane that literally tore apart its natural habitat. The Horned Turtle The horned turtle, genus Meiolania, was a large testudine that roamed Australia, New Caledonia, and Vanuatu. The youngest bones discovered are about 2,800 years old and are from the South Pacific island country of Vanuatu, where it was presumably hunted to extinction by aboriginal settlers. (This seems rather odd, considering that Meiolania came equipped with two horns over its eyes and a spiked tail reminiscent of Ankylosaurus.) Meiolania, by the way, came by its Greek name "little wanderer" by reference to another extinct reptile of Pleistocene Australia, the giant monitor lizard. Wonambi One of the few prehistoric snakes to be discovered in Australia, Wonambi naracoorthsis, was an 18-foot-long, 100-pound predator capable of taking down (though perhaps not swallowing) a full- grown giant wombat. A related species, W. barriei, was described in 2000. Even at the height of its powers, though, the Wonambi snakes were an evolutionary last gasp: The family of snakes from which it descended, the "madtsoiids," had a global distribution for tens of millions of years but were restricted to Australia on the cusp of the modern era. The Wonambi went extinct about 40,000 years ago, slightly before (or coincident with) the arrival of the first Aboriginal Australians. Giant Monitor Lizard Megalania, the "giant wanderer"—not to be confused with Meiolania, the "little wanderer," described above—was a 25-foot-long, 2-ton monitor lizard that would have given theropod dinosaurs a run for their money. Megalania was probably the apex predator of late Pleistocene Australia, preying on resident megafauna like the giant short-faced kangaroo and capable of giving Thylacoleo (the marsupial lion) a run for its money. Why did the giant monitor lizard go extinct 40,000 years ago? No one knows for sure, but suspects include climate change or the disappearance of this reptile's usual prey. Quinkana Quinkana was far from the biggest crocodile that ever lived, but it made up for its relative lack of heft with its unusually long legs and sharp, curved, tyrannosaur-like teeth, which must have made it a true menace to the mammalian megafauna of late Pleistocene Australia. Like its fellow reptiles from Down Under, Wonambi and the giant monitor lizard, Quinkana went extinct about 40,000 years ago, either because of hunting by Aboriginal settlers or the disappearance of its customary prey. .
Recommended publications
  • Biogeography of the Caribbean Cyrtognatha Spiders Klemen Čandek1,6,7, Ingi Agnarsson2,4, Greta J
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Biogeography of the Caribbean Cyrtognatha spiders Klemen Čandek1,6,7, Ingi Agnarsson2,4, Greta J. Binford3 & Matjaž Kuntner 1,4,5,6 Island systems provide excellent arenas to test evolutionary hypotheses pertaining to gene fow and Received: 23 July 2018 diversifcation of dispersal-limited organisms. Here we focus on an orbweaver spider genus Cyrtognatha Accepted: 1 November 2018 (Tetragnathidae) from the Caribbean, with the aims to reconstruct its evolutionary history, examine Published: xx xx xxxx its biogeographic history in the archipelago, and to estimate the timing and route of Caribbean colonization. Specifcally, we test if Cyrtognatha biogeographic history is consistent with an ancient vicariant scenario (the GAARlandia landbridge hypothesis) or overwater dispersal. We reconstructed a species level phylogeny based on one mitochondrial (COI) and one nuclear (28S) marker. We then used this topology to constrain a time-calibrated mtDNA phylogeny, for subsequent biogeographical analyses in BioGeoBEARS of over 100 originally sampled Cyrtognatha individuals, using models with and without a founder event parameter. Our results suggest a radiation of Caribbean Cyrtognatha, containing 11 to 14 species that are exclusively single island endemics. Although biogeographic reconstructions cannot refute a vicariant origin of the Caribbean clade, possibly an artifact of sparse outgroup availability, they indicate timing of colonization that is much too recent for GAARlandia to have played a role. Instead, an overwater colonization to the Caribbean in mid-Miocene better explains the data. From Hispaniola, Cyrtognatha subsequently dispersed to, and diversifed on, the other islands of the Greater, and Lesser Antilles. Within the constraints of our island system and data, a model that omits the founder event parameter from biogeographic analysis is less suitable than the equivalent model with a founder event.
    [Show full text]
  • (2007) a Photographic Field Guide to the Reptiles and Amphibians Of
    A Photographic Field Guide to the Reptiles and Amphibians of Dominica, West Indies Kristen Alexander Texas A&M University Dominica Study Abroad 2007 Dr. James Woolley Dr. Robert Wharton Abstract: A photographic reference is provided to the 21 reptiles and 4 amphibians reported from the island of Dominica. Descriptions and distribution data are provided for each species observed during this study. For those species that were not captured, a brief description compiled from various sources is included. Introduction: The island of Dominica is located in the Lesser Antilles and is one of the largest Eastern Caribbean islands at 45 km long and 16 km at its widest point (Malhotra and Thorpe, 1999). It is very mountainous which results in extremely varied distribution of habitats on the island ranging from elfin forest in the highest elevations, to rainforest in the mountains, to dry forest near the coast. The greatest density of reptiles is known to occur in these dry coastal areas (Evans and James, 1997). Dominica is home to 4 amphibian species and 21 (previously 20) reptile species. Five of these are endemic to the Lesser Antilles and 4 are endemic to the island of Dominica itself (Evans and James, 1997). The addition of Anolis cristatellus to species lists of Dominica has made many guides and species lists outdated. Evans and James (1997) provides a brief description of many of the species and their habitats, but this booklet is inadequate for easy, accurate identification. Previous student projects have documented the reptiles and amphibians of Dominica (Quick, 2001), but there is no good source for students to refer to for identification of these species.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Checklist of Extant Endemic Species and Subspecies of the Windward Dutch Caribbean (St
    Preliminary checklist of extant endemic species and subspecies of the windward Dutch Caribbean (St. Martin, St. Eustatius, Saba and the Saba Bank) Authors: O.G. Bos, P.A.J. Bakker, R.J.H.G. Henkens, J. A. de Freitas, A.O. Debrot Wageningen University & Research rapport C067/18 Preliminary checklist of extant endemic species and subspecies of the windward Dutch Caribbean (St. Martin, St. Eustatius, Saba and the Saba Bank) Authors: O.G. Bos1, P.A.J. Bakker2, R.J.H.G. Henkens3, J. A. de Freitas4, A.O. Debrot1 1. Wageningen Marine Research 2. Naturalis Biodiversity Center 3. Wageningen Environmental Research 4. Carmabi Publication date: 18 October 2018 This research project was carried out by Wageningen Marine Research at the request of and with funding from the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality for the purposes of Policy Support Research Theme ‘Caribbean Netherlands' (project no. BO-43-021.04-012). Wageningen Marine Research Den Helder, October 2018 CONFIDENTIAL no Wageningen Marine Research report C067/18 Bos OG, Bakker PAJ, Henkens RJHG, De Freitas JA, Debrot AO (2018). Preliminary checklist of extant endemic species of St. Martin, St. Eustatius, Saba and Saba Bank. Wageningen, Wageningen Marine Research (University & Research centre), Wageningen Marine Research report C067/18 Keywords: endemic species, Caribbean, Saba, Saint Eustatius, Saint Marten, Saba Bank Cover photo: endemic Anolis schwartzi in de Quill crater, St Eustatius (photo: A.O. Debrot) Date: 18 th of October 2018 Client: Ministry of LNV Attn.: H. Haanstra PO Box 20401 2500 EK The Hague The Netherlands BAS code BO-43-021.04-012 (KD-2018-055) This report can be downloaded for free from https://doi.org/10.18174/460388 Wageningen Marine Research provides no printed copies of reports Wageningen Marine Research is ISO 9001:2008 certified.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mesozoic Era Alvarez, W.(1997)
    Alles Introductory Biology: Illustrated Lecture Presentations Instructor David L. Alles Western Washington University ----------------------- Part Three: The Integration of Biological Knowledge Vertebrate Evolution in the Late Paleozoic and Mesozoic Eras ----------------------- Vertebrate Evolution in the Late Paleozoic and Mesozoic • Amphibians to Reptiles Internal Fertilization, the Amniotic Egg, and a Water-Tight Skin • The Adaptive Radiation of Reptiles from Scales to Hair and Feathers • Therapsids to Mammals • Dinosaurs to Birds Ectothermy to Endothermy The Evolution of Reptiles The Phanerozoic Eon 444 365 251 Paleozoic Era 542 m.y.a. 488 416 360 299 Camb. Ordov. Sil. Devo. Carbon. Perm. Cambrian Pikaia Fish Fish First First Explosion w/o jaws w/ jaws Amphibians Reptiles 210 65 Mesozoic Era 251 200 180 150 145 Triassic Jurassic Cretaceous First First First T. rex Dinosaurs Mammals Birds Cenozoic Era Last Ice Age 65 56 34 23 5 1.8 0.01 Paleo. Eocene Oligo. Miocene Plio. Ple. Present Early Primate First New First First Modern Cantius World Monkeys Apes Hominins Humans A modern Amphibian—the toad A modern day Reptile—a skink, note the finely outlined scales. A Comparison of Amphibian and Reptile Reproduction The oldest known reptile is Hylonomus lyelli dating to ~ 320 m.y.a.. The earliest or stem reptiles radiated into therapsids leading to mammals, and archosaurs leading to all the other reptile groups including the thecodontians, ancestors of the dinosaurs. Dimetrodon, a Mammal-like Reptile of the Early Permian Dicynodonts were a group of therapsids of the late Permian. Web Reference http://www.museums.org.za/sam/resource/palaeo/cluver/index.html Therapsids experienced an adaptive radiation during the Permian, but suffered heavy extinctions during the end Permian mass extinction.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Grouping in the Dominican Ground Lizard, Pholidoscelis Fuscatus (Fitzinger, 1843)
    Herpetology Notes, volume 12: 273-278 (2019) (published online on 18 February 2019) Characteristics of grouping in the Dominican Ground Lizard, Pholidoscelis fuscatus (Fitzinger, 1843) Victoria L. Grotbeck1,2, Grace E. Garrison3, Maria A. Eifler2,4,*, and Douglas A. Eifler4 Abstract. Animals form groups when membership provides a net benefit, but environmental conditions can contribute to intraspecific variation in sociality. We observed grouping behaviour in the Dominican Ground Lizard Pholidoscelis fuscatus (Fitzinger, 1843; formerly Ameiva) in two adjacent habitats differing in vegetation density to assess group characteristics and their environmental correlates. Demographic structure differed between sites, with the more open site having a preponderance of large individuals. Group size differed significantly between our two habitats, with larger groups occurring in the more open area. The spatial distribution of groups was not random, although we did not detect specific habitat characteristics associated with group formation. Groups tended to be composed of similar-sized individuals. Our study revealed differences in demographic structure and sociality; given the nature of the groups we observed, predation risk and foraging constraints may promote group formation. The balance of costs and benefits stemming from predator avoidance and finding food may serve to link ecological conditions and intraspecific variation in sociality. Keywords. Ameiva; Dominica; foraging; habitat structure; predation risk; size assortivity; sociality Introduction that are closely related, may differ in their propensity to form groups – both social groups and aggregations Animal groups represent a set of individuals who are (Rolland et al., 1998; Brashares et al., 2000; Fleischmann close in space and time, and can form through a variety and Kerth, 2014), and the strength of grouping tendencies of mechanisms.
    [Show full text]
  • 29 | Vertebrates 791 29 | VERTEBRATES
    Chapter 29 | Vertebrates 791 29 | VERTEBRATES Figure 29.1 Examples of critically endangered vertebrate species include (a) the Siberian tiger (Panthera tigris), (b) the mountain gorilla (Gorilla beringei), and (c) the Philippine eagle (Pithecophega jefferyi). (credit a: modification of work by Dave Pape; credit b: modification of work by Dave Proffer; credit c: modification of work by "cuatrok77"/Flickr) Chapter Outline 29.1: Chordates 29.2: Fishes 29.3: AmphiBians 29.4: Reptiles 29.5: Birds 29.6: Mammals 29.7: The Evolution of Primates Introduction Vertebrates are among the most recognizable organisms of the animal kingdom. More than 62,000 vertebrate species have been identified. The vertebrate species now living represent only a small portion of the vertebrates that have existed. The best-known extinct vertebrates are the dinosaurs, a unique group of reptiles, which reached sizes not seen before or after in terrestrial animals. They were the dominant terrestrial animals for 150 million years, until they died out in a mass extinction near the end of the Cretaceous period. Although it is not known with certainty what caused their extinction, a great deal is known about the anatomy of the dinosaurs, given the preservation of skeletal elements in the fossil record. Currently, a number of vertebrate species face extinction primarily due to habitat loss and pollution. According to the International Union for the Conservation of Nature, more than 6,000 vertebrate species are classified as threatened. Amphibians and mammals are the classes with the greatest percentage of threatened species, with 29 percent of all amphibians and 21 percent of all mammals classified as threatened.
    [Show full text]
  • Snakes, Centipedes, Snakepedes, and Centiserpents: Conflation of Liminal Species in Maya Iconography and Ethnozoology
    f No. 9, 2004 WAYEB NOTES ISSN 1379-8286 SNAKES, CENTIPEDES, SNAKEPEDES, AND CENTISERPENTS: CONFLATION OF LIMINAL SPECIES IN MAYA ICONOGRAPHY AND ETHNOZOOLOGY. (Workshop Closing Paper Presented at the XXIVth Linda Schele Forum on Maya Hieroglyphic Writing at the University of Texas at Austin, March 2000) Harri Kettunen1 and Bon V. Davis II2 1 University of Helsinki 2 University of Texas at Austin Abstract Since the identification of centipedes in the Maya hieroglyphic corpus and iconography in 1994 by Nikolai Grube and Werner Nahm (Grube & Nahm 1994: 702), epigraphers and iconographers alike have debated whether the serpentine creatures in Maya iconography depict imaginative snakes or centipedes. In this paper we argue that most serpentine creatures with unrealistically depicted heads are neither snakes nor centipedes, but a conflation of both, and even have characteristics of other animals, such as sharks and crocodiles. Thus these creatures should more aptly be designated as zoomorphs, monsters, centiserpents, or dragons. In the present article the topic will be examined using iconographic, epigraphic, zoological, and ethozoological data. Acknowledgements We would like to express our thanks to Justin Kerr for directing the Workshop on Maya ceramics at the XXIVth Maya Meeting in Austin. We would also like to thank Justin for making available hundreds of roll-out photographs of Maya ceramics and for offering us his insights on Maya iconography. Furthermore, we would like to thank Nancy Elder, the head librarian of the Biological Sciences Library at the University of Texas at Austin for providing us numerous articles relating to our topic and for directing us to relevant sources during our research on centipedes.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics of Quaternary Squamata from Cuba
    UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO MUSEU DE ZOOLOGIA Ernesto Aranda Pedroso Systematics of Quaternary Squamata from Cuba Sistemática dos Squamata Quaternários de Cuba Corrected version Dissertation presented to the PostGraduate Program of the Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo to obtain the degree of Master of Science (Systematics, Animal Taxonomy and Biodiversity) Advisor: Hussam El Dine Zaher Co-Advisor: Luis Manuel Díaz Beltrán São Paulo 2019 Resumo Aranda E. (2019). Sistemática dos Squama do Quaternário de Cuba. (Dissertação de Mestrado). Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo. A paleontologia de répteis no Caribe é um tema de grande interesse para entender como a fauna atual da área foi constituída a partir da colonização e extinção dos seus grupos. O maior número de fósseis pertence a Squamata, que vá desde o Eoceno até nossos dias. O registro abrange todas as ilhas das Grandes Antilhas, a maioria das Pequenas Antilhas e as Bahamas. Cuba, a maior ilha das Antilhas, tem um registro fóssil de Squamata relativamente escasso, com 11 espécies conhecidas de 10 localidades, distribuídas no oeste e centro do país. No entanto, existem muitos outros fósseis depositados em coleções biológicas sem identificação que poderiam esclarecer melhor a história de sua fauna de répteis. Um total de 328 fósseis de três coleções paleontológicas foi selecionado para sua análise, a busca de características osteológicas diagnosticas do menor nível taxonômico possível, e compará-los com outros fósseis e espécies recentes. No presente trabalho, o registro fóssil de Squamata é aumentado, tanto em número de espécies quanto em número de localidades. O registro é estendido a praticamente todo o território cubano.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Theecological Systemsof Puerto Rico
    United States Department of Agriculture Guide to the Forest Service Ecological Systems International Institute of Tropical Forestry of Puerto Rico General Technical Report IITF-GTR-35 June 2009 Gary L. Miller and Ariel E. Lugo The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the National Forests and national grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD).To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Authors Gary L. Miller is a professor, University of North Carolina, Environmental Studies, One University Heights, Asheville, NC 28804-3299.
    [Show full text]
  • Describing Species
    DESCRIBING SPECIES Practical Taxonomic Procedure for Biologists Judith E. Winston COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS NEW YORK Columbia University Press Publishers Since 1893 New York Chichester, West Sussex Copyright © 1999 Columbia University Press All rights reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data © Winston, Judith E. Describing species : practical taxonomic procedure for biologists / Judith E. Winston, p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-231-06824-7 (alk. paper)—0-231-06825-5 (pbk.: alk. paper) 1. Biology—Classification. 2. Species. I. Title. QH83.W57 1999 570'.1'2—dc21 99-14019 Casebound editions of Columbia University Press books are printed on permanent and durable acid-free paper. Printed in the United States of America c 10 98765432 p 10 98765432 The Far Side by Gary Larson "I'm one of those species they describe as 'awkward on land." Gary Larson cartoon celebrates species description, an important and still unfinished aspect of taxonomy. THE FAR SIDE © 1988 FARWORKS, INC. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Universal Press Syndicate DESCRIBING SPECIES For my daughter, Eliza, who has grown up (andput up) with this book Contents List of Illustrations xiii List of Tables xvii Preface xix Part One: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 3 Describing the Living World 3 Why Is Species Description Necessary? 4 How New Species Are Described 8 Scope and Organization of This Book 12 The Pleasures of Systematics 14 Sources CHAPTER 2. BIOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE 19 Humans as Taxonomists 19 Biological Nomenclature 21 Folk Taxonomy 23 Binomial Nomenclature 25 Development of Codes of Nomenclature 26 The Current Codes of Nomenclature 50 Future of the Codes 36 Sources 39 Part Two: Recognizing Species 41 CHAPTER 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Speciation Is a Burning Issue in Evolutionary Biology, but It
    Introduction Speciation is a burning issue in evolutionary biology, but it is both fascinating and frustrating. Defining speciation depends on one’s species concept viz., typological, biological, evolutionary, recognition etc. In its simplest form, speciation is lineage splitting (ancestor-descendent sequence of populations); the resulting lineages are genetically isolated and ecologically distinct. Speciation is the process of evolutionary mechanism by which new biological species (or taxa) arise. There are two ways of new species (or taxa) origin from the pre-existing one:- i. by splitting of the parent species into two or more species (by the splitting of phylogenetic lineage) and ii. by transformation of the old species into a new one in due course of time. The Biologist O.F. Cook (1906) seems to have been the first to coin the term ‘speciation’ for the splitting of lineages (cladogenesis).The process of evolutionary mechanism by which new biological plant species (or taxa) arise, is known as plant speciation. General Mechanism of Speciation operating in nature: The mechanism of speciation is a two- staged process in which reproductive isolating mechanisms (RIM's) arise between groups of populations. Stage 1 • gene flow is interrupted between two populations. • absence of gene flow allows two populations to become genetically distinct as a result of their adaptation to different local conditions (genetic drift plays an important role here). • as populations differentiate, RIMs appear because different gene pools are not mutually coadapted. • reproductive isolation appears primarily in the form of postzygotic RIMs: hybrid failure. • these early RIMs are a byproduct of genetic differentiation, not directly promoted by natural selection.
    [Show full text]