An Abstract of the Thesis Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Abstract of the Thesis Of AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Byrne Tadaaki Miyamoto for the degree of Master of Science in Wood Science presented on May 8, 2017. Title: Establishing Design Values for Potential Utilization of Western Juniper as a Building Material. Abstract approved: _____________________________________________________________________ Arijit Sinha Western juniper (Juniperus occidentalis) is a conifer that is native to Oregon, California, Washington, Nevada, and Idaho. Juniper is known to have highly decay resistant heartwood and is a popular choice for finished furniture. With recent forest management practices over the past 100 years have resulted in an immense population increase in western juniper stands, transforming the grasslands/sagebrush into juniper forests. Landowners have been encouraged to cutback western juniper to restore grassland habitat, but there is no major market associated with juniper. This study assessed the strength and durability properties of western juniper in order to develop design values in collaboration with the West Coast Lumber Inspection Bureau (WCLIB). The data will be presented to American Lumber Standard Committee (ALSC) for inclusion in the National Design Specification. Design values assigned to western juniper will allow contractors to use this species in structural and non-structural applications, especially for State funded projects. Samples were harvested from three locations in eastern Oregon, one location in northeast California, and one location in southwest Idaho. Tests were performed according to procedures described in ASTM Standard D143 small-clear specimens for compression, bending, and shear. Average strength values were calculated and compared to similar wood species. Most properties were similar to those of other species, but modulus of elasticity was significantly lower. The differences between species might be attributed to cell wall structure and distribution of lignin in the cells. Design values for western juniper were calculated using the strength values following the ASTM Standard D245 procedure for establishing structural grades and related allowable properties for visually graded lumber. Durability of western juniper was assessed using laboratory decay tests, marine tests, and ground contact exposure. The long term marine durability and ground contact tests are still on going. The laboratory decay test indicated that western juniper heartwood was highly resistant to attack by brown and white rot fungi. ©Copyright by Byrne Tadaaki Miyamoto May 8, 2017 All Rights Reserved Establishing Design Values for Potential Utilization of Western Juniper as a Building Material by Byrne Tadaaki Miyamoto A THESIS submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Presented May 8, 2017 Commencement June 2017 Master of Science thesis of Byrne Tadaaki Miyamoto presented on May 8, 2017. APPROVED: _____________________________________________________________________ Major Professor, representing Wood Science _____________________________________________________________________ Head of the Department of Wood Science and Engineering _____________________________________________________________________ Dean of the Graduate School I understand that my thesis will become part of the permanent collection of Oregon State University libraries. My signature below authorizes release of my thesis to any reader upon request. _____________________________________________________________________ Byrne Tadaaki Miyamoto, Author ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Sustainable Northwest, United States Department of Agriculture, Oregon Department of Transpiration, and Business Oregon for providing funding to make this project possible. I would also like to thank Don Devisser, from West Coast Lumber Inspection Bureau, for helping with the organization of testing as well as the development of design values. I would like to thank the faculty and staff in the wood science department, especially my professors Dr. Arijit Sinha and Dr. Jeff Morrell, for allowing me to work with them and their lab groups. They both have helped and encouraged me through each step of my education. I would like to thank Matthew Konkler, Jed Cappellazzi, and Milo Clauson for always willing to help me with the various aspects of my project. I also would like to thank the front desk staff, Jessica King, Michelle Maller, and Angela Haney. I would like to thank all the student workers that help me with my project, especially Thomas Hutton and Quinton Anderson for spending long days cutting juniper samples, as well as Kayla Naas and Raquel Albee for helping test samples. Lastly, I would like to thank my parents for supporting me throughout school and encouraging me to pursue a higher education. Also thank you to all my friends and colleagues. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................1 1.1 Research Objectives ...............................................................................................5 Chapter 2: Literature Review ...............................................................................................6 2.1 Western Juniper .....................................................................................................6 2.2 Range and Climate .................................................................................................6 2.3 Expansion ...............................................................................................................7 2.4 Market Research ..................................................................................................10 2.5 Physical and Mechanical Properties ....................................................................11 2.6 Design Values ......................................................................................................15 Chapter 3: Material And Methods .....................................................................................19 3.1 Mechanical Test Materials ...................................................................................19 3.1.1 Dry/Green Ratio Samples .........................................................................21 3.2 Mechanical Test Methods ....................................................................................21 3.2.1 Bending .....................................................................................................21 3.2.2 Compression Parallel ................................................................................23 3.2.3 Compression perpendicular .......................................................................24 3.2.4 Shear ..........................................................................................................25 3.2.5 Moisture Content and density ...................................................................26 3.2.6 Dry/Green Ratio ........................................................................................26 3.2.7 Design Value Calculations ........................................................................27 3.2.8 Statistical Analysis of Mechanical Tests ..................................................30 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page 3.3 Durability Materials and Methods .......................................................................31 3.3.1 Marine Durability Samples .......................................................................31 3.3.2 Laboratory Decay Test ..............................................................................32 3.3.3 Ground Contact Test .................................................................................34 Chapter 4: Results and Disscusion .....................................................................................36 4.1 Compression Parallel-to -Grain (||) Test ..............................................................37 4.2 Compression Perpendicular-to-Grain (⊥) Test ....................................................40 4.3 Shear Block Test ..................................................................................................44 4.4 Three-Point Bending Test ....................................................................................47 4.4.1 Modulus of Elasticity (MOE) ...................................................................47 4.4.2 Modulus of Rupture (MOR) .....................................................................50 4.5 Green/Dry Ratio of Compression Perpendicular-to-Grain and Shear .................52 4.6 Strength Values ....................................................................................................53 4.7 Design Values ......................................................................................................53 4.8 Laboratory Decay Test .........................................................................................55 Chapter 5: Summary ..........................................................................................................60 5.1 Summary ..............................................................................................................60 5.2 Conclusion ...........................................................................................................61 5.3 Limitation and Future Work Recommendations ..................................................62 Bibliography ......................................................................................................................64
Recommended publications
  • A PLACE to CHERISH and STUDY BACK Mary Mcdonald
    THE MAGAZINE OF THE OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION WINTER OREGON 2016 STATER A PLACE TO CHERISH AND STUDY BACK LOOKING LOOKING Mary McDonald >> and the forest on the hill By Ann Kinkley | Photos by Hannah O’Leary Clipboard in hand, binoculars around her neck, OSU master’s candi- date Amy Barry ’09 moves beneath a canopy of older Douglas fir in the McDonald-Dunn Research Forest, the crown jewel of the College of Forestry’s living laboratories. She’s checking snags — old, dead trees — for small birds such as chickadees, studying how different species make use of the ragged, decaying trunks and branches as the forest matures. Generations of students and researchers have studied, and will continue to study, in the 11,250 acres just beyond the northern city limits of Corvallis, exploring everything from new logging techniques to how various recreation activities change as a forest changes. Told that the woman whose generosity allowed the college to buy the first major pieces of the “Mac-Dunn” had no strong connections to the college but, simply out of gratitude and generosity, wanted to make sure its students had a good place to do their research, Barry is amazed. “That’s absolutely incredible,” she says. “It’s crucial for the work we do to have a forest like this that’s not maintained primarily for tim- ber harvest, but for research. And to have it so close — I can leave my office in Peavy Hall and be here in 15 minutes!” 20 << OREGON STATER hy did Mary McDonald, a wealthy widow in California, give money to Oregon Agricultural College to Wpurchase 6,000 acres of forestland, plus a valuable rare book collection and the resources to create a room for them, as well as endowments for scholarships in several departments? The expertise of Oregon State forestry legend George Peavy had plenty to do with it.
    [Show full text]
  • EUGENE GLENDER Growing up on a T R ?Ico Family Farii
    I EUGENE GLENDER Growing up on a T r ?ico Family FarII on County, C egon: 1910-' 941 Oral History Interviews by Bob Zybach and Jan Meranda Soap Creek Valley History Project = = = = OSU Research Forests SU RESEARCH FORESTS Monograph #9 COLLEGE OF FOE1'Y 1994 EUGENE GLENDER Growing up on a Tampico Family Farm Benton County, Oregon: 1910-1941 Oral History Interviews by Bob Zybach and Jan Meranda Soap Creek Valley History Project OSU Research Forests Monograph #9 1994 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Soap Creek Valley History Project was authorized by, and is under the direction of, Dr. William Atkinson, former Director of the OSU Research Forests. Funding for the project is provided by the OSU College of Forestry. Lisa Buschman, former OSU Research Forests secretary, transcribed interview recordings to computer ifies and assisted with draft editing, formatting, and indexing. Holly Behm Losli, Tanii Torres, and Md. Shahidul Islam, OSU Research Forests text editors, completed final formatting and indexing under the direction of Pam Beebee, OSU Research Forests Office Manager. This project could not have been completed without the help of these people. Cover Photo: Courtesy of Myra Moore Lauridson and the Soap Creek Schoolhouse Foundation. Pictured is the Moore family farm on Soap Creek, taken about 1899 or 1900 by Mrs. Lauridson's father, Samuel H. Moore. Title Page Photo: Sisters Leone (left) and Elvera (right) Glender pose in front of the Glender family farmhouse in the early 1920s. Coffin Butte appears to the north in the background, while the Beatty fir trees (reputed to have been planted in 1858 along the old wagon road to the California gold mines) are seen to the immediate east of the home.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Life of Treated and Untreated Fence Posts: 1996 Post Farm Report
    Research Contribution 26 August 1999 SERVICE LIFE OF TREATED AND UNTREATED FENCE POSTS: 1996 POST FARM REPORT by Jeffrey J Morrell Donald J Miller Philip F Schneider College of Forest Research Laboratory Forestry Oregon State University The Forest Research Laboratory of Oregon State University was established by the Oregon Legislature to conduct research leading to expanded forest yields, increased use of forest products, and accelerated economic development of the State. Its scientists conduct this research in laboratories and forests administered by the University and cooperating agencies and industries throughout Oregon. Research results are made available to potential users through the University’s educational programs and through Laboratory pub- lications such as this, which are directed as appropriate to forest landowners and managers, manufacturers and users of forest products, leaders of govern- ment and industry, the scientific community, and the general public. The Authors Jeffrey J Morrell is a professor, Donald J Miller is a professor emeritus, and Philip F Schneider is a graduate research assistant, Department of Forest Products, Oregon State University, Corvallis. Disclaimer The mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. WARNING: This publication reports research involving pesticides. It does not contain recommendations for their use, nor does it imply that the uses discussed here have been registered. All uses of pesticides must be registered by appropriate State and Federal agencies before they can be recommended. To Order Copies Copies of this and other Forest Research Laboratory publications are available from: Forestry Publications Office Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon 97331-7401 Phone: (541) 737-4271 FAX: (541) 737-2668 email: [email protected] Web site: http://www.cof.orst.edu/cof/pub/home/ Please indicate author(s), title, and publication number if known.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Highlights in Oregon 2017
    Forest Health Highlights in Oregon 2017 DRAFT Oregon Department of Pacific Northwest Region Forestry Forest Health Protection Forest Health Program for the greatest good AGENDA ITEM 4 Attachment 2 Page 1 of 36 Forest Health Highlights in Oregon 2017 Joint publication contributors: Christine Buhl¹ Zack Heath² Sarah Navarro¹ Karen Ripley² Danny Norlander¹ Robert Schroeter² Wyatt Williams¹ Ben Smith² ¹Oregon Department of Forestry ²U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender Cooperative Aerial Survey: 2017 Flight lines DRAFT The aerial survey program is changing! Give us input to better serve your needs. Front cover image: Orange hawkweed (Hieracium aurantiacum), a European exotic, was first identified in Oregon in 2017 in Clatsop County (Photo by Peter Dziuk). AGENDA ITEM 4 Attachment 2 Page 2 of 36 Table of Contents SUMMARY .........................................................................................................................................1 AERIAL AND GROUND SURVEYS .........................................................................................................2 ABIOTIC STRESSORS ...........................................................................................................................4 Climate and Weather ...................................................................................................................4 Drought .......................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Facilities Services Records, 1888-2010 Page 5 of 64
    Guide to the Facilities Services Records, 1888-2010 Page 5 of 64 Series Outline Series I. Architectural Drawings and Plans, 1901-1999 1928-1991 Series II. Building Project Files, 1938-2002 1974-1998 Series III. Building Specifications and Reports, 1909-2003 Series IV. Capital Construction Project Files, 1962-1997 Series V. Facilities Planning and Use Committee Records, 1981-1985 Series VI. General Construction Files, 1989-1997 Series VII. Minor Building Modification Files, 1985-1993 Series VIII. General Subject Numbered Files, 1968-1991 Series IX. Committee Records, 1966-2003 Series X. Correspondence, 1888-2003 Series XI. Land Ownership and Property, 1940-1951 Series XII. Policies and Procedures, 1986-1994 Series XIII. Publications, 1989-2001 Series XIV. Space Use, 1960-1969 Series XV. Staff Meeting Minutes, 1992-2001 Series XVI. Time Records, 1913-1939 Series XVII. Renderings (Drawings) of Campus Buildings, 1949-1975 Series XVIII. Book Plans, 1960-1993 Series XIX. Lighting (Interior) Study, circa early-mid 1980s Series XX. Campus, Farm, and Property Maps, 1899-1990 Series XXI. Aerial Photographs, 1952-1979 Series XXII. Photographs, 1963 Oregon State University Libraries, University Archives PDF Created January 20, 2016 Guide to the Facilities Services Records, 1888-2010 Page 7 of 64 Detailed Description of the Collection Series I. Architectural Drawings and Plans, 1901-1999 1928-1991 (196 cubic feet (7418 sheets), 151 map folders and 5 oversize boxes) Series I consists of architectural drawings and plans for construction of or major modifications to most structures on the Corvallis campus and for many at other OSU locations throughout the state. They include facilities used for teaching, research, administration, athletic events, and student housing and dining.
    [Show full text]
  • Learn. Explore. Discover! DR
    Teacher’s Guide Learn. Explore. Discover! DR. WILLIAM FERRELL FOREST DISCOVERY PROGRAM OSU Research Forest, Peavy Arboretum 541-737-4452 OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY DR. WILLIAM FERRELL FOREST DISCOVERY PROGRAM Teacher’s Guide Contents FAQ – Forest Discovery TRail (FDT) program . 1 What is the Forest Discovery Trail (FDT) Program? ................................. 1 Where does this program take place?. .1 Who is this program for? ..................................................... 1 When is the best time to bring students to the forest? ............................. 1 How to use the Forest Discovery Trail Program . 2 Forest Discovery Activity Card Sets . 3 Where to find Forest Discovery Program (FDT) Materials . 4 Teacher’s Backpacks ........................................................ 4 Online Access: ............................................................. 4 Check List - Getting Ready for your Field Trip: . 5 Tips for making your outdoor field trip fun and safe . 6 Field Trip Duration .......................................................... 6 What should you and your students bring?. .6 Safety tips ................................................................ 6 Fun is Important! ........................................................... 7 Follow your student’s interests ................................................ 7 Download iNaturalist and Seek for free to your phone through the App Store .......... 7 Who Was Dr . William Ferrell? . 8 What are the OSU Research Forests? . 8 Why take the time and effort to get students
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Needle Nutritional Status in a Nordmann Fir Christmas Tree
    Proceedings of the 8. international christmas tree research & extension conference Thomsen, Iben Margrete; Rasmussen, Hanne Nina; Sørensen, Johanne Margrethe Møller Publication date: 2008 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (APA): Thomsen, I. M., Rasmussen, H. N., & Sørensen, J. M. M. (Eds.) (2008). Proceedings of the 8. international christmas tree research & extension conference Forest & Landscape, University of Copenhagen. Download date: 09. okt.. 2021 Proceedings of the 8th International Christmas Tree Research & Extension Conference FOREST & LANDSCAPE WORKING PAPERS 26 / 2008 By Iben M. Thomsen, Hanne N. Rasmussen & Johanne M. Sørensen (Eds.) Title Proceedings of the 8th International Christmas Tree Research & Extension Conference IUFRO Working Unit 2.02.09 - Christmas Trees Hotel Bogense Kyst, Denmark, August 12th - 18th, 2007 Held by Forest & Landscape Denmark and Danish Christmas Tree Growers’ Association Editors Iben Margrete Thomsen Hanne N. Rasmussen Johanne Møller Sørensen Publisher Forest & Landscape Denmark University of Copenhagen Hørsholm Kongevej 11 DK-2970 Hørsholm Tel. +45 3533 1500 [email protected] Series-title and no. Forest & Landscape Working Papers no. 26-2008 published on www.SL.life.ku.dk also available at www.ps-xmastree.dk and www.iufro.org ISBN 978-87-7903-342-9 Citation Thomsen, I.M., Rasmussen, H.N. & Sørensen, J.M. (Eds.) 2008: Proceedings of the 8th International Christmas Tree Research and Extension Conference. Forest & Landscape Working Papers No. 26- 2008, 145 pp. Forest & Landscape Denmark, Hørsholm. Citation allowed with clear source indication Written permission is required if you wish to use Forest & Landscape’s name and/or any part of this report for sales and advertising purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fire and Tree Mortality Database, for Empirical Modeling of Individual Tree Mortality After Fire
    UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works Title The Fire and Tree Mortality Database, for empirical modeling of individual tree mortality after fire. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6066718v Journal Scientific data, 7(1) ISSN 2052-4463 Authors Cansler, C Alina Hood, Sharon M Varner, J Morgan et al. Publication Date 2020-06-22 DOI 10.1038/s41597-020-0522-7 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California www.nature.com/scientificdata opeN The Fire and Tree Mortality Data DeScripTor Database, for empirical modeling of individual tree mortality after fre C.Alina Cansler et al.# Wildland fres have a multitude of ecological efects in forests, woodlands, and savannas across the globe. A major focus of past research has been on tree mortality from fre, as trees provide a vast range of biological services. We assembled a database of individual-tree records from prescribed fres and wildfres in the United States. The Fire and Tree Mortality (FTM) database includes records from 164,293 individual trees with records of fre injury (crown scorch, bole char, etc.), tree diameter, and either mortality or top-kill up to ten years post-fre. Data span 142 species and 62 genera, from 409 fres occurring from 1981-2016. Additional variables such as insect attack are included when available. The FTM database can be used to evaluate individual fre-caused mortality models for pre-fre planning and post-fre decision support, to develop improved models, and to explore general patterns of individual fre-induced tree death. The database can also be used to identify knowledge gaps that could be addressed in future research.
    [Show full text]
  • General Recruiting Guide
    TTHISHIS IISS OOREGONREGON SSTATETATE OOREGONREGON SSTATETATE UUNIVERSITYNIVERSITY EXPLORE A PLACE. WHERE AMAZING THINGS HAPPEN. At Oregon State University, you’ll discover a place where faculty and students are working together to address the world’s greatest challenges through research and creative innovation. Explore our campus, and you’ll see why OSU is known throughout the state, the nation and the world for the excellence of its programs and the quality of its people. True to its designation as Oregon’s land-grant university, OSU is investing in the state’s economic and cultural future, with a focus in five multidisciplinary areas: advancing the arts and sciences; understanding the earth and its resources; opti- mizing economic development; advancing the health and well-being of the public; and managing natural resources and assisting natural-resource based industries. As Oregon’s premier research university, and with more than $206 million in annual research funding, the depth and breadth of OSU’s impact spans 26 countries and dozens of world-class institutions. What’s more, a recent study shows OSU’s economic footprint in the state exceeds $1.5 billion. More than 19,700 students attend OSU from every state and more than 80 foreign countries. They can choose from 200+ academic programs at campuses in Corval- lis and Bend, along with online programs through Ecampus. In addition, OSU is one of the only West Coast universities to have four cultural centers and minority education offices, contributing to the cultural diversity of Corvallis. The 420-acre OSU campus is located in the heart of Corvallis; its landmark buildings and lush landscaping contribute to the city’s beautiful setting.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008-09 Oregon State Men's Basketball Season
    2009-10 OREGON STATE MEN’S BASKETBALL • TABLE OF CONTENTS OREGON STATE QUICK FACTS TTABLEABLE OOFF CCONTENTSONTENTS School ...............................................................................Oregon State University Location .............................................................................................Corvallis, Ore. TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................... 1 John Mandic ...........................................................................................................72 Founded .............................................................................................................1868 QUICK FACTS ..................................................................................................................... 1 Jose Ortiz ................................................................................................................73 Enrollment .....................................................................................................20,200 2009-10 SCHEDULE AND ROSTER ............................................................................. 2 Wally Palmberg ......................................................................................................73 Colors ..........................................................................................Orange and Black “Red” Rocha ............................................................................................................73 THIS IS
    [Show full text]
  • George Wilcox Peavy 1869-1951
    George Wilcox Peavy 1869-1951 George Wilcox Peavy was one of the spriest, initial 181 acres were dedicated in 1926. cheeriest, most energetic and forward-looking The main body of these forested hills north “elder” foresters to ever roam the Pacific of Corvallis is now McDonald Forest, Northwest. He was a pioneer who became a totaling 6,581 acres and named after Mrs. professional forester before there was any Mary L. McDonald, whom the Dean profession in this country, who pioneered a interested in his visionary dream. great forest school, who became a Fellow of The school’s forest became a workshop for the Society of American Foresters and who fernhoppers, a laboratory for forest finally became a college president. education and a test tube for new ideas in reforestation and cultural movements of “Dean” Peavy was born on a farm near forests. The Dean made the Arboretum a Howell, Michigan, on November 12, 1869. He center for social education, where his boys went to the University of Michigan, received gained a love of their profession and a his B.S. degree in 1895 and then tried school respect for simplicity and for true teaching. After a fling at being high school democracy. principal and then newspaperman, he was stimulated by Gifford Pinchot’s call for For years, Dean Peavy served as chairman foresters and went back to Michigan. He left of the faculty committee on student affairs, Ann Arbor with a M.S.F. degree in 1905 and where his understanding of youth and his entered the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcdonald--Dunn Forest Plan
    McDonald--Dunn Forest Plan June, 2005 Interdisciplinary Planning Team Rick Fletcher, Forestry Extension, Chair Becky Johnson, Associate Dean of Forestry, Co-chair Gary Blanchard, Starker Forests Bill Emmingham, Forest Science John Hayes, Forest Science Debbie Johnson, College Forests Norm Johnson, Forest Resources Dave Lysne, College Forests Glen Murphy, Forest Engineering Mike Newton, Forest Science John Sessions, Forest Engineering 2 McDonald/Dunn Forest Plan Contents Summary .................................................................................................................................................................................................5 Introduction and Description ...........................................................................................................................................................7 Location ...................................................................................................................................................................7 History ......................................................................................................................................................................8 Geology, Soils, and Hydrology ...................................................................................................................... 10 Current Forest Condition ................................................................................................................................ 11 Forest Goals ........................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]