DOCSLIB.ORG

Shift Or Rift, Assessing US-EU Relations After Iraq

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shift Or Rift, Assessing US-EU Relations After Iraq Transat-COVER-3.qxd 12/11/2003 15:04 Page 1 Shift or Rift Assessing US-EU relations after Iraq Nicole Gnesotto, Stanley Hoffmann, Antonio Missiroli, David Gompert, Jean-Yves Haine, Ivo Daalder, James Lindsay, Martin Ortega, Patrick Clawson, Dimitrios Triantaphyllou, Daniel Serwer, Gustav Lindstrom, Brian Jenkins Edited by Gustav Lindstrom Institute for Security Studies Security for Institute Transatlantic Book 2003 Book Transatlantic European Union European Transat-COVER-3.qxd 12/11/2003 15:04 Page 2 Transatlantic Book 2003 Transatlantic Shift or Rift In January 2002 the Institute for Security Studies (ISS) beca- me an autonomous Paris-based agency of the European Union. Following an EU Council Joint Action of 20 July . 2001, it is now an integral part of the new structures Assessing US-EU relations after Iraq that will support the further development of the CFSP/ESDP. The Institute’s core mission is to provide analyses and recommendations that can be of use and relevance to the formulation of the European security and defence policy. In carrying out that mission, it also acts as an interface between European experts and decision-makers at all levels. edited by Gustav Lindstrom TRANSATEnglish-Text.qxd 12/11/2003 14:56 Page 1 Shift or rift Assessing US-EU relations after Iraq Nicole Gnesotto, Stanley Hoffmann, Antonio Missiroli, David Gompert, Jean-Yves Haine, Ivo Daalder, James Lindsay, Martin Ortega, Patrick Clawson, Dimitrios Triantaphyllou, Daniel Serwer, Gustav Lindstrom, Brian Jenkins Edited by Gustav Lindstrom Institute for Security Studies European Union Paris TRANSATEnglish-Text.qxd 12/11/2003 14:56 Page 2 Institute for Security Studies European Union Paris Director: Nicole Gnesotto © EU Institute for Security Studies 2003. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the EU Institute for Security Studies. ISBN 92-9198-043-9 Published by the EU Institute for Security Studies and printed in Alençon (France) by l’Alençonnaise d’Impressions. Cover design by Hanno Ranck. TRANSATEnglish-Text.qxd 12/11/2003 14:56 Page 3 Contents Preface 7 Nicole Gnesotto Introduction 9 Gustav Lindstrom US and EU visions of the world 1 The crisis in transatlantic relations 13 Stanley Hoffmann 2 EU, US: visions of the world, visions of the other 21 Nicole Gnesotto • Visions of the world 23 • Visions of the other 33 • Conclusion 42 The future of Europe 3 What does America want of Europe? 43 David C. Gompert • Introduction 43 • The political effects of Iraq - breakdown and catharsis 45 • The larger problem - the capabilities gap and the role of force 49 • An interests-based relationship 57 • Alternative futures 63 • Conclusion 73 4 Mind the gaps - across the Atlantic and the Union 77 Antonio Missiroli • American apples and European oranges 77 • Euros and defence 80 • Hubs and spokes 85 TRANSATEnglish-Text.qxd 12/11/2003 14:56 Page 4 The future of the United States American foreign policy and transatlantic relations 5 in the age of global politics 91 Ivo H. Daalder and James M.Lindsay • The lone global power 92 • Globalisation 94 • Hegemonists vs. globalists: the utility of power 95 • Who is right? 96 • Implications for the transatlantic relationship 99 • A tipping-point? 101 6 Power without restraint? Back to realities 105 Jean-Yves Haine • Global by ambition, alone by choice 106 • Flawed by logic, risky by nature 112 • Multilateral by identity, together by necessity 119 • Options for the future 122 CASE STUDY 1: US and EU priorities in the Middle East 7 US and European priorities in the Middle East 127 Patrick Clawson • Israeli-Palestinian peace process 127 • International intervention for Palestinian-Israeli peace? 132 • Reconstructing Iraq 135 • Iran’s nuclear programme 137 • Promoting reform 144 • Conclusion 145 8 The Achilles heel of transatlantic relations 147 Martin Ortega • US leadership, ups and downs 148 • EU involvement 150 • Shaky scenarios 152 • American and European perceptions of the Middle East 155 • The price of prejudice: Israel and Iraq 158 • From perception to vision: towards an EU policy on the Middle East 160 • Basic principles for an EU Middle East policy 163 • Epilogue: the advantages of a transatlantic policy on the Middle East 166 4 TRANSATEnglish-Text.qxd 12/11/2003 14:56 Page 5 CASE STUDY 2: US and EU in the Balkans 9 The Balkans: from American to European leadership 169 Daniel Serwer • US interests in the Balkans are multiple but secondary 170 • European interests are more vital but varied 173 • Lack of cooperation leads to ineffectiveness 176 • US leadership changes the picture 178 • The future of US/European cooperation in the Balkans 183 • Is Europe ready? 187 • Conclusions 189 The interplay between the EU and the United States 10 in the Balkans 191 Dimitrios Triantaphyllou • Between the end of the Cold War and the Dayton/Paris Accords 194 • The implications of US involvement 199 • American exceptionalism and the Balkans 204 CASE STUDY 3: Terrorism — US and European perspectives The US response to terrorism and its implications for 11 transatlantic relations 207 Brian Michael Jenkins • Towards a global phenomenon 207 • Escalating violence 210 • The US response 212 • Transatlantic differences 220 • Efforts and challenges post-9/11 226 12 Terrorism: European myths and realities 231 Gustav Lindstrom • Myth 1: Europeans don’t care about terrorism 231 • Myth 2: Europeans are not willing to use military might to combat terrorism 237 • Myth 3: European and US approaches to combating terrorism are incompatible 245 • Implications for the transatlantic link 248 a Annexes 251 • About the authors 251 • Abbreviations 253 5 TRANSATEnglish-Text.qxd 12/11/2003 14:56 Page 6 6 TRANSATEnglish-Text.qxd 12/11/2003 14:56 Page 7 Preface Nicole Gnesotto 003 will be remembered as an annus horribilis par excellence for international relations as a whole but particularly transat- 2 lantic relations. Disagreements between individual countries over the questions of whether Iraq really posed a threat and the legitimacy of military intervention have been, and remain, massive, and divisions between Europe and America have fuelled similar differences within the European Union itself. The gulf between the people of Europe and their governments has been no less marked, a clear majority of the public, either through opinion polls or in street demonstrations, having expressed their hostility to US policy on Iraq. Since the beginning of the autumn, out of weariness, resignation or pragmatism, an apparent rec- onciliation – what Kofi Annan has referred to as a semblance of consen- sus – seems to be emerging on both sides, without any illusions and with- out any noticeable effect on either the reality of the situation in Iraq or the strength of the Euro-American relationship. A multitude of questions arise from this. How is it that we have arrived at such a situation? Why is it that American neo-conservatives think they can take liberties with international law that they would refuse to allow even their closest ally to take? How, and how far, will it be possible to reduce the world’s extreme political complexity to simply an opposition of good and evil? Why should the Europeans accept that rela- tions of authority become a rule in transatlantic affairs, with the unin- tended risk that it undermines the basic democratic value of their alliance with America? Future generations will have the difficult task of judging the responsibility of each actor in bringing us to what, no matter which way one looks at it, appears to be a watershed in the contemporary his- tory of democracies. The aim of this book is more modest: to explore, through various American and European viewpoints, the extent to which a convergence of values and truly common interests could, leaving aside all ideology, make it possible to rebuild a transatlantic relationship that is dignified and respectful, but above all of benefit to the security of all. I am most thankful to Gustav Lindstrom, who is responsible for the Institute’s transatlantic programme, for having taken the lead in this project. Paris, October 2003 7 TRANSATEnglish-Text.qxd 12/11/2003 14:56 Page 8 8 TRANSATEnglish-Text.qxd 12/11/2003 14:56 Page 9 Shift or rift Introduction Assessing US-EU relations after Iraq Gustav Lindstrom The idea behind this transatlantic book predates the intense transatlantic exchanges that took place prior to the war in Iraq in early 2003. The run-up to the passage of UN Resolution 1441 in November 2002 provided clear indications that Euro-American relations were about to enter previously uncharted territory. Given these developments, the Institute decided to produce an extensive study analysing the state of transatlantic relations. For each topic, two authors – one American and one European – were commissioned to provide their thoughts and insights. The result is twelve distinct chapters covering six diverse topics. The book provides both a general overview of US-European relations and investigates specific issue areas through case studies. The diversity on the American side is particularly great, with five different insti- tutions represented among the authors. On the European side, contributions come from the multinational research team at the EU Institute for Security Studies. It should be noted that the views expressed in these chapters are the authors’ alone, and do not nec- essarily reflect those of their institutes. They were written between the spring and summer of 2003. The first two chapters cover US and EU visions of the world. They set the stage by analysing American and European foreign policy objectives and how these have diverged over the past few years. The American contribution – by Stanley Hoffmann – revis- its the transatlantic crisis that reached its climax during the war in Iraq.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The American Deep State, Deep Events, and Off-The-Books Financing
    The American Deep State, Deep Events, and Off-the- Books Financing By Prof Peter Dale Scott Region: USA Global Research, April 07, 2014 Theme: Intelligence, US NATO War Agenda The Asia-Pacific Journal, Vol. 12, Issue 14, No. 3 I have been writing about deep politics since 1993, when I gave the example of how the United States after World War sent American mafia figures to fight communism in Italy, thereby creating a corrupted politics that was soon out of control – as bad as the influence the mafia once possessed in cities like Marseille, or Chicago.1 Since then I have written about deep events, by which I mean mysterious events, like the JFK assassination, the Watergate break-in, or 9/11, which repeatedly involve law-breaking or violence, and are embedded in fact in deep politics. Some of these may be low-level, as when data is filched from a personal computer, or mid-level, like the murder of Karen Silkwood. But what I have called structural deep events are large enough to affect the whole fabric of society, with “consequences that enlarge covert government, and are subsequently covered up by systematic falsifications in media and internal government records.” We still live in the official state of emergency imposed after the last great deep event – 9/11; and this has left us in a deconstitutionalized era of warrantless surveillance, warrantless detentions, and militarized homeland security.2 In the remainder of this essay, the deep events I refer to will all be structural deep events. I have come to believe that most structural deep events (or SDEs) are interrelated, and that the study of any one of them helps understand others.
    [Show full text]
  • Stock Market Sets Records, Signaling Optimism for 2021
    P2JW056000-6-A00100-17FFFF5178F ****** THURSDAY,FEBRUARY 25,2021~VOL. CCLXXVII NO.45 WSJ.com HHHH $4.00 DJIA 31961.86 À 424.51 1.3% NASDAQ 13597.97 À 1.0% STOXX 600 413.21 À 0.5% 10-YR. TREAS. g 7/32 , yield 1.388% OIL $63.22 À $1.55 GOLD $1,796.40 g $8.00 EURO $1.2171 YEN 105.85 Lawmakers Take the Field to Keep Their Distance McKinsey What’s News Partners Vote Out Business&Finance Leader cKinsey’s partners MvotedtoremoveKeviN Kevin Sneader, who Sneader as the consulting firm’sleader afterinternal had tightened controls dissatisfaction over steps he following crises, fails took following aseries of crises forthe company. A1 to win a second term TheDow rose 1.3% to are- BY JUSTIN SCHECK cord,while the S&P 500 and AND VANESSA FUHRMANS Nasdaq gained 1.1% and 1%, respectively.The Russell McKinsey &Co.’s partners 2000 jumped 2.4%. A1,B10 votedtoremoveKeviN CustomersinTexas’ dereg- Sneader as the eliteconsulting S ulated electricity market have firm’sleader,after internal paid $28 billion morefor elec- PRES dissatisfaction over stepshe tricity over two decades than TED took following a series of cri- CIA they would have at therates SO ses forthe firm, people famil- chargedtoresidentsserved AS iar with the matter said. A/ by traditional utilities. A1 UP The decision—the result of KR astaggered voting process WeWork co-founder and that McKinsey’s approximately ex-CEONeumann is settoreap 650 senior partners undertake an extra$50 million windfall CHARLES PRIME SEATS: New Hampshire legislators attend a state House of Representatives session at a sports center in Bedford, everythree yearstochoose or and other benefitsaspart of N.H., Wednesday in order to keep all 400 members a safe distance from each other during the pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • I-Sources 01 1Er Novembre 2009 01 Sélection D’Articles Et De Documents Sur Le Renseignement & La Sécurité Internationale Publiée Par Le
    i-sources_01 1er novembre 2009 01 Sélection d’articles et de documents sur le renseignement & la sécurité internationale publiée par le ACTUALITÉ DU RENSEIGNEMENT TERRORISME blog / site PRIVATISATION DU RENSEIGNEMENT PROLIféRATION ET TRAFIC pdf ET DE LA SÉCURITÉ D’ARMES livre FORCES ET opéRATIONS SpéCIALES CRIMINALITÉ ET MAFIAS article video / podcast GUERRE DE L’INfoRMATION RISQUES INTERNATIONAUX CYBERMENACES CONFLITS ARMÉS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ACTUALITÉ DU RENSEIGNEMENT Intelligence failures and reforms – Seminar#599, July 2009 – Inde Rameshwar Nath Kao, founding father of RAW – B. Raman His name was Rameshwar Nath Kao -- Ramjee to his relatives, friends and colleagues and «Sir» to his junior colleagues. He was the founding father of the Research & Analysis Wing, India’s external intelligence agency, created on September 21, 1968, by bifurcating the Intelligence Bureau, which used to deal with internal as well as external intelligence. In 1982, Count Alexandre de Marenches, who headed the French external intelligence agency Service For External Documentation And Counter-Intelligence or SDECE as it was then known under President Valery Giscard d’Estaing, was asked by an interlocutor to name the five great intelligence chiefs of the 1970s. Mr Kao, whom he knew well and admired, was one of the five named by him. He praised the way Mr Kao had built up RAW into a professional intelligence organisation and made it play within three years of its creation a formidable role in changing the face of South Asia in 1971. He remarked: «What a fascinating mix of physical and mental elegance! What accomplishments! What friendships! And, yet so shy of talking about himself, his accomplishments and his friends.» Iftar Surprise by ISI Chief – B.
    [Show full text]
  • Americans and Europeans Dancing in the Dark
    AMERICANS AND EUROPEANS DANCING IN THE DARK A MERICANS AND E UROPEANS DANCING IN THE DARK On Our Differences and Affinities, Our Interests, and Our Habits of Life DENNIS L. BARK HOOVER INSTITUTION PRESS STANFORD UNIVERSITY STANFORD, CALIFORNIA FOR France Marie Catherine Pauline & Dwight, Matthew, Samuel Whichever way they cross the Atlantic they are going home PAGE v The Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace, founded at Stanford University in 1919 by Herbert Hoover, who went on to become the thirty-first president ofthe United States, is an interdisciplinary research centerforadvanced studyondomestic and international affairs. The views expressed in its publications are entirely thoseofthe authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views ofthe staff,officers,or Board ofOverseers ofthe Hoover Institution. www.hoover.org Hoover Institution Press Publication No. 554 Copyright ᭧ 2007 by the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without written permission of the publisher. First printing, 2007 14 13 12 11 10 09 08 07 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Manufactured in the United States of America The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences— Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48–1992.⅜ϱ Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Bark, Dennis L. Americans and Europeans dancing in the dark : on our differences and affinities, our interests, and our habits of life / Dennis L.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanley Hoffmann Was Spread Upon the Permanent Records of the Faculty
    At a meeting of the FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES on April 5, 2016, the following tribute to the life and service of the late Stanley Hoffmann was spread upon the permanent records of the Faculty. STANLEY HOFFMANN BORN: November 27, 1928 DIED: September 13, 2015 Stanley Hoffmann, the Paul and Catherine Buttenwieser University Professor, Emeritus, died at the age of 86 after a long illness, in Cambridge, Massachusetts, on September 13, 2015. As the preeminent American scholar of French and of European politics, Hoffmann charted the course of the continent’s politics in discerning essays that joined an innate sympathy to critical distance, attracting wide audiences on both sides of the Atlantic. As a leading scholar of international relations and American foreign policy, he left a deep mark on contemporary understandings of some of the most perplexing issues of our time. At Harvard, he was a founder of the Social Studies concentration in 1960 and of what is now the Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies in 1969, where, as its chairman for twenty-five years, he created a community especially receptive to young scholars. As a dazzling lecturer in the legendary courses War, Modern France, and Ethics in International Relations, he shaped the ideas of thousands of Harvard students during his fifty-eight years on the Harvard faculty. Stanley Harry Hoffmann was born in Vienna on November 27, 1928, of a distant American father and an Austrian mother, with whom he moved in the early 1930s to France, where he grew up, attending schools in Nice and Paris.
    [Show full text]
  • Revue Historique Des Armées, 247 | 2007 Bref Historique Des Services De Renseignement Et De Sécurité Français Contemp
    Revue historique des armées 247 | 2007 Le renseignement Bref historique des services de renseignement et de sécurité français contemporains Claude Faure Édition électronique URL : http://journals.openedition.org/rha/1843 ISBN : 978-2-8218-0506-4 ISSN : 1965-0779 Éditeur Service historique de la Défense Édition imprimée Date de publication : 15 juin 2007 Pagination : 70-81 ISSN : 0035-3299 Référence électronique Claude Faure, « Bref historique des services de renseignement et de sécurité français contemporains », Revue historique des armées [En ligne], 247 | 2007, mis en ligne le 01 août 2008, consulté le 19 avril 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/rha/1843 Ce document a été généré automatiquement le 19 avril 2019. © Revue historique des armées Bref historique des services de renseignement et de sécurité français contemp... 1 Bref historique des services de renseignement et de sécurité français contemporains Claude Faure 1 Héritiers d’organismes nés au cours de la Seconde Guerre mondiale, les services de renseignement et de sécurité français sont marqués dès l’origine par les conflits, ceux entre les nations et ceux entre les hommes. Fin juin 1940, alors qu’une partie de la France est occupée par l’armée allemande, une structure clandestine de renseignement est mise sur pied au sein de l’armée française d’armistice, avec l’aval du ministre de la Défense nationale, le général Weygand. Placés sous la responsabilité du colonel Louis Rivet, chef du SR/SCR (service de renseignement/section de centralisation des renseignements) du 2e bureau, ces services s’organisent sous la couverture de l’Office national du retour à la terre, du ministère de l’Agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Janvier-Février-Mars 2019 Armée & Défense X 3
    Armée &DéfenseRéserve et Nation « COMBATTANT 2020 » Le nouvel équipement du soldat de l’armée de terre année - n°1/4 e FOCUS Directive budgétaire d’emploi des réserves de l’armée de terre pour 2019 SOUS LA LOUPE SNU : les premiers volontaires dès le mois de juin Janvier - Février Mars 2019 99 PATRIMOINE 1939 : que disaient les sondages de l’époque ? RÉSERVISTE SANS RÉSERVE Être tout à votre engagement Ladifférence Unéo tout en étant Simple Rapide efficacement protégé Trois formules au choix Une adhésion simplifiée en fonction de votre situation et en ligne 1 Sûr Accessible PRÉVOYANCE-RÉSERVISTE Des allocations et/ou capitaux Des cotisations Une protection à la hauteur des risques de votre activité. versés en cas d’arrêt de travail, dès 2,31 € / mois d’invalidité ou de décès (1) Le détail et les conditionslesdétailet Legarantiesdes (1) définissont règlementUnéo,mutuelledansle h. mutualité,mutualiste 18 soumise la dispositionsCodedeàaux inscrite 30durépertoire Unéo-Ciblage au IIhlivrevendredi, lundi duauSIRENE8 Du applicable de(2)février 152019. au sous le numéro 503 380 081 et dont le siège social est situé 48 rue Barbès – 92544Barbèsruesiège–Montrougesituésocial48 estnumérodontle Vincentsousleet 380 503081 Cedex.COMTN © ORSINI/MarineCrédits© photos- : Nationale/Défense SirpaGendarmerie©Olympe ©-Goubault/Armée - l’air/Arméesde - RÉFÉRENCÉE MINISTÈRE DES ARMÉES RÉFÉRENCÉE MINISTÈRE DES ARMÉES Découvrez la différence Unéo sur groupe-uneo.fr et au 0970 809 0002 Votre force mutuelle C’est aux civils [ Georges Clemenceau ] Armée de défendre
    [Show full text]
  • FRENCH POLITICS and POLICY GROUP NEWS No.8/October 2007 FPG/Apsacoordinators: Amy G
    FRENCH POLITICS AND POLICY GROUP NEWS No.8/October 2007 FPG/APSACoordinators: Amy G. Mazur and Andrew Appleton, Nirmal Joshi (Assistant Coordinator) Department of Political Science, Washington State University e-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.wsu.edu/~frg/ FPPG/ PSA Coordinator: Ben Clift, Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Warwick e-mail [email protected] Website: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/staff/clift/psafpp/ ________________________________________________________________________ ______ GREETINGS TO ALL This is the joint newsletter of the French Politics Group of the American Political Science Association and the French Politics and Policy Group of the Political Science Association in the UK. We begin with the activities of the US-based group and follow with the UK group’s news. We invite you to also go to our websites for more information on both groups. Welcome to the new members of the APSA French Politics Group and also to Andrew Appleton who will be co convening the FPG. We currently have over 192 members, also listed on our website. Our meetings at APSA Chicago this year were the most successful to date- with a short course, five panels, a working group, our second reception and the announcement of our first Stanley Hoffmann Best Article Award. In addition to an attendance of over 110 for our various panels and roundtable, we had the pleasure of hosting two special guests - - the Deputy Chief of Mission from the French Embassy François Rivasseau and the French Consul General in Chicago, Jean Baptiste Main de Boissière. We have continued the momentum of our international collaboration with our regular French institutional partners: Association Française de Science Politique, Sciences Po Paris, CEVIPOF and starting this year, many of the Institut d’Etudes Politiques of the regions.
    [Show full text]
  • ALEXANDRE DE MARENCHES, MAÎTRE ESPION OU PROPHÈTE DE MALHEURS ? › Agathe Atkins
    ALEXANDRE DE MARENCHES, MAÎTRE ESPION OU PROPHÈTE DE MALHEURS ? › Agathe Atkins « Jeudi 15 juin 1972. L’après-midi, je vois Raphaël-Leygues, puis Marenches, avec qui je m’étais accroché. J’ai l’impression que cette vie de déjeuners à l’extérieur lui a fait prendre un certain nombre de kilos et qu’il risque plus de ce côté que de la part des services étrangers. » Jacques Foccart, La France pompidolienne. Journal de l’Élysée (1). a biographie de Jean-Christophe Notin sur Alexandre de Marenches (2), le légendaire patron du Service de docu- mentation extérieure et de contre-espionnage (Sdece, la future DGSE) de 1970 à 1981, est une contribution majeure à l’histoire des services secrets français. Au siège, Là la caserne des Tourelles, 141, boulevard Mortier ou plus familière- ment « La Piscine », on l’appelait « Dagobert », « Pervenche » et, pour les moins respectueux, « le Pachyderme ». Les journalistes l’ont long- temps surnommé « Porthos ». D’autres, adeptes d’un goût de la formule poussé, voyaient en lui « le Hoover français » car Marenches détient « un record inégalé et sans doute inégalable » : onze années de règne. Le paral- lèle s’arrête à la longueur du mandat parce qu’il n’avait pas la perversité OCTOBRE 2018 OCTOBRE 2018 171 études, reportages, réflexions de son homologue américain. De tous les responsables des services fran- çais, c’est le plus connu du grand public. Guidé par Christine Ockrent, il s’était raconté avec succès dans un livre de souvenirs, Dans le secret des princes (3), best-seller sorti cinq ans après sa démission à l’arrivée de la gauche à l’Élysée en 1981.
    [Show full text]
  • European Media Representations of US Foreign Policy Making
    Loughborough University Institutional Repository Framing the neocons : European media representations of US foreign policy making This item was submitted to Loughborough University's Institutional Repository by the/an author. Additional Information: • A Doctoral Thesis. Submitted in partial fullment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy of Loughborough University. Metadata Record: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/12167 Publisher: c George Tzogopoulos Please cite the published version. This item was submitted to Loughborough University as a PhD thesis by the author and is made available in the Institutional Repository (https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/) under the following Creative Commons Licence conditions. For the full text of this licence, please go to: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ ~~~-~-------~-,---~---",--,------.--------.--.--.--- ....-- ... ~ ....., ~l r. ., ~ ~ ~ f ;~:~: ''-' "'.' ,. --,.~'.J ,] -: ~.. 1 .: .. : ;~ ~ ~ :.; ~"..(~,;;~:;:-;, ~;~ -~.- ~. ,:.:--' ~.-:r:'- -. .....:t·.. _;,;::..... _-.. ~',· .... '~~:J;·-.-'t'.u=-"- :'. ,-". -',";:V." -"" .:_'~ ,l.:.:.. _~.~~...... '~~.-•.:..J;I! ...........~ l J.~,VV j r!~~i\10. - k - - ~ ,I t ~ ~ ~."7'1.~_~~_\W.. .._.. i ....~ r __ ~.."'"-"_~I IDat3 I !':r-,.:; ,'v·_- ••. "-'.-.:..:~.~..v..... - •.".,,'l._:.: __~-,:.-:.: ... -;-' .,._y~·.~.'"-r.:', ..-._~·>;....:.T .• "-,-~;:::,~;.:: ... ~..:.;.:~...I.~~Cl<C-~~ 'Framing the Neocons: European Media Representations of US Foreign Policy-Making' by George Tzogopoulos A Doctoral Thesis Submitted in partial
    [Show full text]
  • The Pahlavis and the Other Side of the Coins
    Comparative Civilizations Review Volume 84 Number 84 Spring 2021 Article 9 2021 The Pahlavis and the Other Side of the Coins Ardavan Khoshnood Lund University, Lund, Sweden, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, History Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Khoshnood, Ardavan (2021) "The Pahlavis and the Other Side of the Coins," Comparative Civilizations Review: Vol. 84 : No. 84 , Article 9. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/vol84/iss84/9 This Letter to the Editor is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Comparative Civilizations Review by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Khoshnood: The Pahlavis and the Other Side of the Coins 112 Number 84, Spring 2021 Letter to the Editor The Pahlavis and the Other Side of the Coins Ardavan Khoshnood Lund University, Lund, Sweden [email protected] It was with great interest that I read “Political Power of Iranian Hierocracies” by János Jany published in Comparative Civilizations Review (83, 2020: 67-102). Writing about Iranian history is not an easy task because historical points of view have been highly politicized. Such is particularly the case when discussing the Pahlavi dynasty, particularly its founder, Reza Shah Pahlavi, and his successor, Mohammed Reza Shah Pahlavi. It is therefore of major importance to be transparent and, when feasible, to present the varying views and schools of thought which may exist with respect to the Pahlavi dynasty (Khoshnood, 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • The Fates of American Presidents Who Challenged the Deep State (1963-1980) アメリカの深層国家に抗した大統領の運 命(1963-1980)
    Volume 12 | Issue 43 | Number 4 | Article ID 4206 | Oct 20, 2014 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus The Fates of American Presidents Who Challenged the Deep State (1963-1980) アメリカの深層国家に抗した大統領の運 命(1963-1980) Peter Dale Scott In the last decade it has become more and subsurface part of the iceberg I more obvious that we have in America today shall call the Deep State, which what the journalists Dana Priest and William operates according to its own Arkin have called compass heading regardless of who is formally in power.3 two governments: the one its citizens were familiar with, I believe that a significant shift in the operated more or less in the open: relationship between public and deep state the other a parallel top secret power occurred in the 1960s and 1970s, government whose parts had culminating in the Reagan Revolution of 1980. mushroomed in less than a decade In this period five presidents sought to curtail into a gigantic, sprawling universe the powers of the deep state. And as we shall of its own, visible to only a see, the political careers of all five—Kennedy, carefully vetted cadre—and its Johnson, Nixon, Ford and Carter—were cut off entirety . visible only to God.1 in ways that were unusual. One president, Kennedy, was assassinated. Another, Nixon, was forced to resign. And in 2013, particularly after the military return to power in Egypt, more and more To some extent the interplay of these two forms authors referred to this second level asof power and political organization is found in 2 America’s “deep state.” Here for example is all societies.
    [Show full text]