Soluble and Insoluble Impurities in Snow Samples from Ross Island

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Soluble and Insoluble Impurities in Snow Samples from Ross Island Soluble and insoluble impurities Snow-pit studies were conducted at three locations during the 1987-1988 field season (the Bird Saddle, the Terra Nova in snow samples Saddle, Windless Bight) and at three additional locations (Fang from Ross Island, Antarctica Glacier, the Terror Saddle, and the Ross Ice Shelf) during the 1988-1989 field season (see figure 1). We report here only our results from the 1987-1988 pit studies. Seasonal variations in JULIE M. PALAIS, RAYMOND CHUAN, oxygen-isotope ratios are reasonably well preserved at all three and MARY Jo S1ENcEI sites. The accumulation rates (in terms of centimeters of snow per year) as estimated from the oxygen isotope profiles are as follows: Windless Bight approximately 20-40 centimeters per Glacier Research Group year, Bird Saddle approximately 50-60 centimeters per year, Unioersity of New Ham ps/ore Durham, New Ham ps/ore 03824 Terra Nova Saddle approximately 40-50 centimeters per year. Major anions (sulfate, chlorine, and nitrate) were determined by ion chromatography. In this paper, we report preliminary results of snow-pit and Figure 2 shows our results of oxygen-18, sulfate, chloride, urn-core studies that we are making to examine the types of and nitrate from the Windless Bight pit. The chemical varia- soluble and insoluble particles found in snow samples collected tions seen in this pit are representative of the types of varia- around Mount Erebus, the active volcano on Ross Island, Ant- tions seen in all of the pits which we have studied to date. arctica (figure 1). This work is part of a larger study in which The major anion concentrations in the Terra Nova Saddle pit we are also making aerosol measurements aboard an LC-130 are similar to those in the Windless Bight pit. The concentra- Hercules airplane and on the ground in order to determine tions in the Bird Saddle pit, however, are similar for nitrate, whether Mount Erebus has an effect on the chemistry of the but one to two orders of magnitude greater for sulfate and up antarctic troposphere and on regional ice chemistry. The aero- to three orders of magnitude greater for chloride. The source sol measurements are made with a quartz-crystal microbalance of at least some of this sulfate and chloride is believed to be multi-stage cascade impactor to characterize the typical aerosol from sea salt, because abundant sodium chloride crystals were particles found in the volcanic plume of Mount Erebus (both seen in snow samples from this site which were filtered and on the ground at the crater rim and in the air) and in the examined by scanning electron microscope (figure 313). This is ambient troposphere (see Chuan and Palais, Antarctic Journal, probably due to the fact that the Bird Saddle is at a relatively this issue). Several aerosol measurements have also been made low elevation (750 meters) and is very close to areas of open on the ground but away from the direct effects of the volcano. water throughout, at least, the austral summer period. It is interesting to note in the Windless Bight pit profile that there are several large peaks of chloride and sulfate in the years leading up to and including the summer of 1984-1985, which was a period of increased activity at Mount Erebus (Kyle 1986). Some of these peaks appear to show excess chloride (i.e., non-sea-salt chloride) and they are probably volcanic in origin. Snow from these layers is being studied further to look for evidence of volcanic ash or other particles indicative of Erebus activity. Nitrate exhibits maxima in summer at most sites with occasional secondary peaks in winter at some sites. A possible relations with the formation of the ozone hole and the precipitation, in winter, of nitrate from polar stratospheric 30 clouds is being considered to explain these winter nitrate peaks (Legrand and Kirchner 1988). We have been developing new freeze-drying techniques (ly- ophilization) to extract particles from the snow without melt- ing. These particles, along with those collected in the cascade impactor, are examined by scanning electron microscope and energy-dispersive X-ray analysis to determine their morphol- ogy and chemical composition. Studies of particles extracted both by melting and lyophilizing snow-pit and firn-core sam- ples from sites around Ross Island are in progress and com- parisons are being made between the particles found in the snow and those sampled in the atmosphere by cascade im- pactor during the 1987-1988 and 1988-1989 field seasons. Pre- liminary results suggest that the lyophilizing technique preserves a class of amorphous particles composed of low atomic weight (Z) elements such as carbon and oxygen (see figure 3C). Similar particles have been observed in the atmospheric quartz-crystal 65 66 167o 168o I69 microbalance sampling (see Chuan and Palais, Antarctic Jour- Figure 1. Map of Ross Island showing sampling locations from nal, this issue). We also find particles composed of soluble salts 1987-1988 field season (Bird Saddle, Windless Bight, Terra Nova on these filters, such as potassium chloride (figure 3A), sodium Saddle) and 1988-1989 field season (Fang Glacier, Terror Saddle chloride (figure 313), sodium sulfate, and calcium sulfate (figure Ross Ice Shelf). (km denotes kilometer.) 3D). 1989 REVIEW 89 W A snow sample from the Terra Nova Saddle was lyophilized and passed through the cascade impactor so that we could 50 study the mass and size distribution of small particles. The 40 total recovery of particles in the size range from 0.1 to about 20 micrometers came to about 4 x 10 grams per gram of ice. .30 a The particles found on the cascade impactor stages from this sample include complex aggregates (up to about 10 micrometer 20 diameter) of insoluble material composed of silicon, alumi- 10 num, calcium, iron, sulfur, and sodium chloride crystals (ap- proximately 2-micrometer diameter) with small amounts of 01 I I magnesium sulfate, sodium sulfate, calcium sulfate (see figure 100 200 31)), and coalesced sulfuric acid droplets. 14 Examination of particles in the snow pit layers believed to be associated with fallout from Mount Erebus indicate the pres- 12 ence of silicate shards, gold, soluble salts, and oxides of chro- mium and iron, which are all thought to be characteristic of 10 Mount Erebus emissions (see Chuan and Palais, Antarctic Jour- nal, this issue). It is our pleasure to thank the LC-130 and UH-1N crews of VXE-6 for excellent logistical support. This work was funded 0 by National Science Foundation grant DPP 87-04319. 4 2 References 0 Chuan, R., and J.M. Palais. 1989. Do gold, chromium oxide, and 0 100 200 carbon-containing particles provide tracers of Mount Erebus emis- sions? Antarctic Journal of the U.S., 24(5). 8 Kyle, P.R. 1986. Volcanic activity of Mount Erebus, 1984-1986. Ant- arctic Journal of the U.S. 21(5), 7. Legrand, M., and S. Kirchner. 1988. Polar atmospheric circulation and 6 chemistry of recent (1957-1983) south polar precipitation. Geophysical Research Letters, 15, 879-882. 0 z 2 0 (. co co 100 200 N. Ln a-30 a -40 Depth (cm) Figure 2. Profiles of isotopic oxygen-18 (180), sulfate (SO42- ), ni- trate (NO3 _), and chloride (Cl-) in Windless Bight snow pit. (1iEq! I denotes microequivalents per liter. cm denotes centimeter.) 90 ANTARCTIC JOURNAL VM&O F!! C Figure 3. Scanning electron micrographs of particles extracted by lyophilization from snow samples collected at sites around Ross Island. A. Potassium chloride (KCI) pyramid—Erebus Crater Rim snow. B. Sodium chloride (NaCI) cubes—Bird Saddle snow. C. Unidentified particle composed of carbon, oxygen, and silicon—Terra Nova Saddle snow. D. Sodium sulfate (Na2SO4) and calcium sulfate (CaSO 4)— sharp, needle-like crystals—Terra Nova Saddle snow. 1989 REVIEw 91.
Recommended publications
  • DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (CEE) for ANDRILL Mcmurdo Sound Portfolio Madrid, 9/20 De Junio 2003
    XXVI ATCM Working Paper WP-002-NZ Agenda Item: IV CEP 4a NEW ZEALAND Original: English DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (CEE) FOR ANDRILL McMurdo Sound Portfolio Madrid, 9/20 de junio 2003 ANDRILL - The McMurdo Sound Portfolio An international research effort with the participation of Germany, Italy, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States of America. DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (CEE) FOR ANDRILL McMurdo Sound Portfolio Antarctica New Zealand Private Bag 4745, Christchurch Administration Building International Antarctic Centre 38 Orchard Road, Christchurch January 22, 2003 2 CONTENTS 1. NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY.....................................................................................11 2. INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................13 2.1 What is ANDRILL?...............................................................................................13 2.2 The CEE process.................................................................................................15 2.2.1 What is a CEE and why is it needed?....................................................15 2.2.2 Process for preparing the Draft CEE .....................................................15 3. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTIVITES ..............................................................17 2.1 Purpose and Need...............................................................................................17 3.1.1 Scientific justification..............................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Advance Exchange of Operational Information, 2005-2006
    Advance Exchange of Operational Information on Antarctic Activities for the 2005–2006 season United States Antarctic Program Office of Polar Programs National Science Foundation Advance Exchange of Operational Information on Antarctic Activities for 2005/2006 Season Country: UNITED STATES Date Submitted: October 2005 SECTION 1 SHIP OPERATIONS Commercial charter KRASIN Nov. 21, 2005 Depart Vladivostok, Russia Dec. 12-14, 2005 Port Call Lyttleton N.Z. Dec. 17 Arrive 60S Break channel and escort TERN and Tanker Feb. 5, 2006 Depart 60S in route to Vladivostok U.S. Coast Guard Breaker POLAR STAR The POLAR STAR will be in back-up support for icebreaking services if needed. M/V AMERICAN TERN Jan. 15-17, 2006 Port Call Lyttleton, NZ Jan. 24, 2006 Arrive Ice edge, McMurdo Sound Jan 25-Feb 1, 2006 At ice pier, McMurdo Sound Feb 2, 2006 Depart McMurdo Feb 13-15, 2006 Port Call Lyttleton, NZ T-5 Tanker, (One of five possible vessels. Specific name of vessel to be determined) Jan. 14, 2006 Arrive Ice Edge, McMurdo Sound Jan. 15-19, 2006 At Ice Pier, McMurdo. Re-fuel Station Jan. 19, 2006 Depart McMurdo R/V LAURENCE M. GOULD For detailed and updated schedule, log on to: http://www.polar.org/science/marine/sched_history/lmg/lmgsched.pdf R/V NATHANIEL B. PALMER For detailed and updated schedule, log on to: http://www.polar.org/science/marine/sched_history/nbp/nbpsched.pdf SECTION 2 AIR OPERATIONS Information on planned air operations (see attached sheets) SECTION 3 STATIONS a) New stations or refuges not previously notified: NONE b) Stations closed or refuges abandoned and not previously notified: NONE SECTION 4 LOGISTICS ACTIVITIES AFFECTING OTHER NATIONS a) McMurdo airstrip will be used by Italian and New Zealand C-130s and Italian Twin Otters b) McMurdo Heliport will be used by New Zealand and Italian helicopters c) Extensive air, sea and land logistic cooperative support with New Zealand d) Twin Otters to pass through Rothera (UK) upon arrival and departure from Antarctica e) Italian Twin Otter will likely pass through South Pole and McMurdo.
    [Show full text]
  • Continental Field Manual 3 Field Planning Checklist: All Field Teams Day 1: Arrive at Mcmurdo Station O Arrival Brief; Receive Room Keys and Station Information
    PROGRAM INFO USAP Operational Risk Management Consequences Probability none (0) Trivial (1) Minor (2) Major (4) Death (8) Certain (16) 0 16 32 64 128 Probable (8) 0 8 16 32 64 Even Chance (4) 0 4 8 16 32 Possible (2) 0 2 4 8 16 Unlikely (1) 0 1 2 4 8 No Chance 0% 0 0 0 0 0 None No degree of possible harm Incident may take place but injury or illness is not likely or it Trivial will be extremely minor Mild cuts and scrapes, mild contusion, minor burns, minor Minor sprain/strain, etc. Amputation, shock, broken bones, torn ligaments/tendons, Major severe burns, head trauma, etc. Injuries result in death or could result in death if not treated Death in a reasonable time. USAP 6-Step Risk Assessment USAP 6-Step Risk Assessment 1) Goals Define work activities and outcomes. 2) Hazards Identify subjective and objective hazards. Mitigate RISK exposure. Can the probability and 3) Safety Measures consequences be decreased enough to proceed? Develop a plan, establish roles, and use clear 4) Plan communication, be prepared with a backup plan. 5) Execute Reassess throughout activity. 6) Debrief What could be improved for the next time? USAP Continental Field Manual 3 Field Planning Checklist: All Field Teams Day 1: Arrive at McMurdo Station o Arrival brief; receive room keys and station information. PROGRAM INFO o Meet point of contact (POC). o Find dorm room and settle in. o Retrieve bags from Building 140. o Check in with Crary Lab staff between 10 am and 5 pm for building keys and lab or office space (if not provided by POC).
    [Show full text]
  • Program Information
    PROGRAM INFO Program Information National Science Foundation Introduction The purpose of the United States Antarctic Program (USAP) Field Manual is to provide an overview of USAP field logistics, operations, and safety. It contains information relevant to field deployments and living and working in an Antarctic field camp and is intended to en- hance your success in the field. It is your responsibility to be familiar with the skills and techniques covered in this manual. This is intended to be a reference manual and it should be taken into the field with you. Valuable knowledge is provided. Safety, environ- mental stewardship, and your health are of paramount importance. Continued vigilance and action in these areas are essential to main- tain a safe and productive environment for work in Antarctica. The harsh conditions encountered in the field setting, coupled with relatively short deployments and important scientific objectives, re- quire effective leadership and constant risk management from all team members. Reducing the risk of injury and illness depends on a combination of systematic risk assessment, hazard elimination or control, appropriate use of personal protective equipment, and safe work practices. This manual is designed to be used in conjunction with the USAP Field Practices Manual located on www.usap.gov. The Field Prac- tices Manual provides pre-deployment, planning information that is useful during the Support Information Packet (SIP) process. Use of these manuals and adherence to the guidelines set forth will en- hance both your safety and productivity while working in Antarctica. We wish you a very safe and productive field season. Kelly Falkner – Director, Division of Polar Programs Scott Borg – Section Head, Antarctic Infrastructure and Logistics Eric Saltzman – Section Head, Antarctic Sciences USAP Continental Field Manual 1 First Aid Emergency Response Checklist o Survey the scene.
    [Show full text]
  • AMPS Operational Utility
    AMPS Operational Utility Arthur M. Cayette, Chester V. Clogston and James E. Frodge SPAWAR Systems Center, Charleston, SC 1. Introduction and maintain an arid environment. Inflections from Since the inception of the Antarctic Mesoscale this region will typically provide dry katabatic winds Prediction System (AMPS) a unique combination and produce fair weather at McMurdo. of research and numerical modeling development The Ross Sea provides a huge moisture has provided a robust experimental model for the source with a warm surface creating instability. Antarctic. This model has been evaluated in the Moisture can be derived from this region even operational field at McMurdo Station. Operational during the dark of winter with sublimation driven by forecasters have viewed the output twice daily, relatively thin and warm sea ice, polynas, and finding great value in the strengths identifying leads. A major change in McMurdo area weather weaknesses in various situations. Although it is can be noticed when the Ross Sea opens and the an experimental model, the fine resolution and availability of moisture maximizes. Other changes increased prognosis reliability has made this the in the local weather can occur, produced by the model of choice for the U.S. Antarctic Program location of open water in relation to McMurdo. weather operations personnel. When strong southerly winds are driven through Weaknesses have been discovered in the the McMurdo Sound, a reciprocating northerly flow placement of moisture, and temperatures within will typically produce snow and reduced cloud the inversion layer. Strengths have been found in bases driven by the newly opened water. Strong wind patterns, coastal thickness values, elevated winds to the east of Ross Island force ice packs inversions, and projections of low level moisture into the McMurdo Sound and decrease instability when initial validation correlates.
    [Show full text]
  • 2003-2004 Science Planning Summary
    2003-2004 USAP Field Season Table of Contents Project Indexes Project Websites Station Schedules Technical Events Environmental and Health & Safety Initiatives 2003-2004 USAP Field Season Table of Contents Project Indexes Project Websites Station Schedules Technical Events Environmental and Health & Safety Initiatives 2003-2004 USAP Field Season Project Indexes Project websites List of projects by principal investigator List of projects by USAP program List of projects by institution List of projects by station List of projects by event number digits List of deploying team members Teachers Experiencing Antarctica Scouting In Antarctica Technical Events Media Visitors 2003-2004 USAP Field Season USAP Station Schedules Click on the station name below to retrieve a list of projects supported by that station. Austral Summer Season Austral Estimated Population Openings Winter Season Station Operational Science Opening Summer Winter 20 August 01 September 890 (weekly 23 February 187 McMurdo 2003 2003 average) 2004 (winter total) (WinFly*) (mainbody) 2,900 (total) 232 (weekly South 24 October 30 October 15 February 72 average) Pole 2003 2003 2004 (winter total) 650 (total) 27- 34-44 (weekly 17 October 40 Palmer September- 8 April 2004 average) 2003 (winter total) 2003 75 (total) Year-round operations RV/IB NBP RV LMG Research 39 science & 32 science & staff Vessels Vessel schedules on the Internet: staff 25 crew http://www.polar.org/science/marine. 25 crew Field Camps Air Support * A limited number of science projects deploy at WinFly. 2003-2004 USAP Field Season Technical Events Every field season, the USAP sponsors a variety of technical events that are not scientific research projects but support one or more science projects.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-2021 Science Planning Summaries
    Project Indexes Find information about projects approved for the 2020-2021 USAP field season using the available indexes. Project Web Sites Find more information about 2020-2021 USAP projects by viewing project web sites. More Information Additional information pertaining to the 2020-2021 Field Season. Home Page Station Schedules Air Operations Staffed Field Camps Event Numbering System 2020-2021 USAP Field Season Project Indexes Project Indexes Find information about projects approved for the 2020-2021 USAP field season using the USAP Program Indexes available indexes. Astrophysics and Geospace Sciences Dr. Robert Moore, Program Director Project Web Sites Organisms and Ecosystems Dr. Karla Heidelberg, Program Director Find more information about 2020-2021 USAP projects by Earth Sciences viewing project web sites. Dr. Michael Jackson, Program Director Glaciology Dr. Paul Cutler, Program Director More Information Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences Additional information pertaining Dr. Peter Milne, Program Director to the 2020-2021 Field Season. Integrated System Science Home Page TBD Station Schedules Antarctic Instrumentation & Research Facilities Air Operations Dr. Michael Jackson, Program Director Staffed Field Camps Education and Outreach Event Numbering System Ms. Elizabeth Rom; Program Director USAP Station and Vessel Indexes Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station McMurdo Station Palmer Station RVIB Nathaniel B. Palmer ARSV Laurence M. Gould Special Projects Principal Investigator Index Deploying Team Members Index Institution Index Event Number Index Technical Event Index Other Science Events Project Web Sites 2020-2021 USAP Field Season Project Indexes Project Indexes Find information about projects approved for the 2020-2021 USAP field season using the Project Web Sites available indexes. Principal Investigator/Link Event No.
    [Show full text]
  • Background to the ANDRILL Mcmurdo Ice Shelf Project (Antarctica) and Initial Science Volume
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln ANDRILL Research and Publications Antarctic Drilling Program 2007 Background to the ANDRILL McMurdo Ice Shelf Project (Antarctica) and Initial Science Volume T. R. Naish Victoria University of Wellington, [email protected] R. D. Powell Northern Illinois University, [email protected] R. H. Levy University of Nebraska–Lincoln, [email protected] ANDRILL-MIS Science Team Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/andrillrespub Part of the Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons Naish, T. R.; Powell, R. D.; Levy, R. H.; and ANDRILL-MIS Science Team, "Background to the ANDRILL McMurdo Ice Shelf Project (Antarctica) and Initial Science Volume" (2007). ANDRILL Research and Publications. 29. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/andrillrespub/29 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Antarctic Drilling Program at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in ANDRILL Research and Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Terra Antartica 2007, 14(3), 121-130 Background to the ANDRILL McMurdo Ice Shelf Project (Antarctica) and Initial Science Volume T. N AISH1,2*, R. POWELL3, R. LEVY4 & THE ANDRILL-MIS SCIENCE TEAM5 1Antarctic Research Centre, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington - New Zealand 2Geological and Nuclear (GNS) Science, PO Box 30368, Lower Hutt - New Zealand 3Department of Geology and Environmental Geosciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, 60115-2854 - USA 4ANDRILL Science Management Offi ce, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0341 - USA 5 http://www.andrill.org/support/references/appendixc.html *Corresponding author ([email protected]) INTRODUCTION TO THE VOLUME (Horgan et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The First 50 Years of Victoria University of Wellington Antarctic
    The First 50 Years of Victoria University of Wellington Antarctic Research Centre Antarctic Expeditions Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand Phone +64-4-463 6587, Fax +64-4-463 5186 E-mail [email protected] www.vuw.ac.nz/antarctic Recollections and reunion programme Victoria University of Wellington 30 June – 1 July 2007 Table of Contents inside front cover Welcome . .2 Recent Benefactors . .3 Reunion programme . .4 Reunion participants . .6 The Birth of VUWAE . .10 Members of VUWAE: 1957-2007 . .12 Recollections of the first 50 years . .18 Victoria University of Wellington Antarctic Expeditions: The First 50 Years Welcome Recent Benefactors Prior to my first departure for the Ice on a VUWAE expedition, I heard the Throughout the history of VUWAE, Harry Keys, Barry Kohn, Phil Kyle, pre-season talk that ARC Director, Professor Peter Barrett claims to have inherited from Bob Clark. organizations and individuals have sponsored Judy Lawrence, Barrie McKelvey, John and supported the programme with equipment Nankervis, Anthony Parker, Russell Plume, “There are basically only two things to remember”, he instructed. “Firstly, help out and money. Most recently the Antarctic Bryan Sissons, David Skinner, Tim Stern, with the boring jobs at Scott Base. This will put you in a good position with base Research Centre has received a $1 million David Sugden, Tony Taylor, John Thurston, staff, which will make their job easier, and will help make the rest of your field donation from former student Alan Eggers, who Colin Vucetich, Trish Walbridge, Robin season go smoothly. Secondly, come back safely.
    [Show full text]
  • Oceanography and Sedimentation Beneath The
    ISSN 0375 8192 ANTARCTIC RESEARCH CENTRE Antarctic Data Series No 25 OCEANOGRAPHY AND SEDIMENTATION BENEATH THE MCMURDO ICE SHELF IN WINDLESS BIGHT, ANTARCTICA 2005 (Revised August 2007) P.J. Barrett1, L. Carter1, D. Damiani2, G.B. Dunbar1, E. Dunker3, G. Giorgetti2, M.A. Harper1, R.M. McKay1, F. Niessen3, U. Nixdorf3, A.R. Pyne1, C. Riesselmann4, N. Robinson5, C. Hollis6 and P. Strong6 1 Antarctic Research Centre, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, NZ. 2 Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Siena, 8 via Laterina, Siena 52100, Italy. 3 Alfred Wegener Institut fur Polar- und Meerforschung, Columbusstrasse, Bremerhaven, Germany. 4 Department of Geological & Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 90425, USA. 5 National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, PO Box 14-901, Kilbirnie, Wellington, NZ. 6 Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences, PO Box 30-368, Lower Hutt, NZ. in association with the Antarctic Data Series No. 25 A Publication of the Antarctic Research Centre: Victoria University of Wellington PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand This publication is available in pdf format at our http site. http://www.victoria.ac.nz/antarctic/ Cover image: Field Camp at Windless Bight with Mt Erebus on the right. Contents Contents ....................................................................................................................................................... i Figures ........................................................................................................................................................iii
    [Show full text]
  • 2004-2005 Science Planning Summary
    2004-2005 USAP Field Season Table of Contents Project Indexes Project Websites Station Schedules Technical Events Environmental and Health & Safety Initiatives 2004-2005 USAP Field Season Table of Contents Project Indexes Project Websites Station Schedules Technical Events Environmental and Health & Safety Initiatives 2004-2005 USAP Field Season Project Indexes Project websites List of projects by principal investigator List of projects by USAP program List of projects by institution List of projects by station List of projects by event number digits List of deploying team members Scouting In Antarctica Technical Events Media Visitors 2004-2005 USAP Field Season USAP Station Schedules Click on the station name below to retrieve a list of projects supported by that station. Austral Summer Season Austral Estimated Population Openings Winter Season Station Operational Science Openings Summer Winter 20 August 05 October 890 (weekly 23 February 187 McMurdo 2004 2004 average) 2004 (winter total) (WINFLY*) (Mainbody) 2,900 (total) 232 (weekly South 24 October 30 October 15 February 72 average) Pole 2004 2004 2004 (winter total) 650 (total) 34-44 (weekly 22 September 40 Palmer N/A 8 April 2004 average) 2004 (winter total) 75 (total) Year-round operations RV/IB NBP RV LMG Research 39 science & 32 science & staff Vessels Vessel schedules on the Internet: staff 25 crew http://www.polar.org/science/marine. 25 crew Field Camps Air Support * A limited number of science projects deploy at WinFly. 2004-2005 USAP Field Season Technical Events Every field season, the USAP sponsors a variety of technical events that are not scientific research projects but support one or more science projects.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Antarctic Activities 2001-2002
    United States Antarctic Activities 2001-2002 This site fulfills the annual obligation of the United States of America as an Antarctic Treaty signatory to report its activities taking place in Antarctica. This portion details planned activities for July 2001 through June 2002. Modifications to these plans will be published elsewhere on this site upon conclusion of the 2001-2002 season. National Science Foundation Arlington, Virginia 22230 November 30, 2001 Information Exchange Under United States Antarctic Activities Articles III and VII(5) of the ANTARCTIC TREATY Introduction Organization and content of this site respond to articles III(1) and VII(5) of the Antarctic Treaty. Format is as prescribed in the Annex to Antarctic Treaty Recommendation VIII-6, as amended by Recommendation XIII-3. The National Science Foundation, an agency of the U.S. Government, manages and funds the United States Antarctic Program. This program comprises almost the totality of publicly supported U.S. antarctic activities—performed mainly by scientists (often in collaboration with scientists from other Antarctic Treaty nations) based at U.S. universities and other Federal agencies; operations performed by firms under contract to the Foundation; and military logistics by units of the Department of Defense. Activities such as tourism sponsored by private U.S. groups or individuals are included. In the past, some private U.S. groups have arranged their activities with groups in another Treaty nation; to the extent that these activities are known to NSF, they are included. Visits to U.S. Antarctic stations by non-governmental groups are described in Section XVI. This document is intended primarily for use as a Web-based file, but can be printed using the PDF option.
    [Show full text]