DOCSLIB.ORG

Nikolai Vavilov and His Little-Known Impact on Weed Science J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nikolai Vavilov and His Little-Known Impact on Weed Science J Weed Science 2014 62:207–216 Vavilovian Mimicry: Nikolai Vavilov and His Little-Known Impact on Weed Science J. Scott McElroy* Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov was an early 20th century Russian plant scientist who was killed by Joseph Stalin in 1943 for his adherence to basic genetic principles. Vavilov is well known within plant breeding and plant evolutionary biology circles, yet the science of Vavilov is just as important to the field of weed science. Specifically, Vavilov proposed that certain weeds adapted to weed control practices to survive in prehistorical agrarian societies. Most would refer to this adaption as crop mimicry, but the term ‘‘Vavilovian mimicry’’ is more apt. Vavilovian mimicry requires three factors: a model—the crop or desirable plant; a mimic—the weed; and an operator—the discriminating agent, possibly human, animal, or machine. In a modern context, it is proposed that weed adaptation to herbicide applications be included as a form of Vavilovian mimicry, with the acknowledgement that the operator is the herbicide. In this context, Vavilovian mimicry is the adaption of the weed mimic to be perceived by the operator as visually, physically, or biochemically indistinguishable from the crop model. This review will cover the history and legacy of Vavilov in a condensed version in the hope that weed scientists will hold this individual in high regard in our future endeavors and begin to acknowledge Vavilov as one of the first scientists to propose that weeds can mimic the attributes of crops. Key words: Adaptation, crop mimicry, evolution, herbicide resistance, Nikolai Vavilov, Vavilovian mimicry. In 2012 to 2013, at national scientific meetings I are often listed as the name of the All-Union posed a question to numerous weed and agronomic Institute headed by Vavilov), Vavilov was a leading scientist: ‘‘Are you familiar with the work of Nikolai world researcher in the field of plant breeding and Vavilov?’’ No one with whom I spoke could tell me genetics. If left to guide plant breeding research in who Nikolai Vavilov was—although many were the Soviet Union, modern-day Russia could be familiar with Vavilov’s nemesis Trofim Lysenko. quite different. Instead, the work of Vavilov was After a short survey of weed science–related discarded, and the world is poorer for it. Stalin and textbooks, the only citations of Vavilov were in his crony pseudoscientists systematically intimidat- Holzner and Numata (1982) and the works of Jack ed, imprisoned, starved, and killed scientists, all for R. Harlan. Other prominent weed science textbooks political control of scientific knowledge. Nikolai such as Zimdahl (2007) and Radosevich et al. Vavilov died due to the harsh conditions of his (1997) mention the work of Vavilov indirectly, but imprisonment on January 26, 1943. He was do not specifically mention Vavilov. To be fair, imprisoned because being on the right side of until a few years earlier I myself had never heard of science left him on the wrong side of Joseph Stalin. Vavilov until I stumbled on to the book The Murder The story of Nikolai Vavilov is important for of Nikolai Vavilov (Pringle 2008). Pringle (2008) numerous reasons. His story illustrates the danger- tells the story of one of the most brilliant biologists ous mixture of politics and science that can pervert who ever existed, a story that few people have ever scientific research and stall technological advance- heard because in postczarist Russia, Joseph Stalin ment (Roll-Hansen 2005). His story is inspirational virtually exterminated legitimate science, replacing because throughout his persecution he remained world-renowned scientists with working-class, self- dedicated to his country as a scientist, and even in taught pseudoscientists. As a plant breeder and plant the face of certain death in a Soviet prison he geneticist and head of his All-Union Institute of remained an inspiration to prisoners around him. Botany and Applied Cultures (other similar names The story of Vavilov illustrates the importance of free speech and expression in the scientific commu- nity. For the weed science community, it is the DOI: 10.1614/WS-D-13-00122.1 * Associate Professor, Department of Crop, Soil, and overlooked discoveries and theories of weed adap- Environmental Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL tation to cropping systems that need to be 36849. Corresponding author’s E-mail: [email protected] rediscovered and acknowledged. McElroy: Vavilovian mimicry N 207 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.35.76, on 26 Sep 2021 at 19:56:00, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-13-00122.1 throughout the world, while at the time the Soviet Union was becoming more isolated (Crow 1993). Vavilov had created a comprehensive plant breeding and genetics program to rival any other in the world and he did it by not being closed off to the world but by being open to all discoveries and ideas that all had to offer (Medvedev 1970). But in the Stalinist-led Soviet Union, scientists affiliated with persons outside the country were seen as possible conspirators against the government (Crow 1993; Medvedev 1970). Vavilov was frequently labeled a traitor and spy for foreign governments plotting to destroy the Soviet Union by not producing improved varieties of crops fast enough, thus prolonging famines and starvation. Trofim Lysenko was a self-taught crop scientist who garnered attention as an opponent of Vavilov. Lysenko used political posturing, bold promises that could not be delivered upon, and absolute lies to destroy scientific research in the Soviet Union beginning in the 1930s (Crow 1993; Medvedev 1970; Roll-Hansen 2005). Lysenko dismissed the dominant scientific theories of the day proposed by Mendel, Darwin, and Morgan, such as basic heredity, chromosome theory, and the existence Figure 1. Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov. November 25, 1887– of mutations (Medvedev 1970). Lysenko and his January 26, 1943. (Image provided by N.I. Vavilov Research Lysenkoists created theories based on Lamarckism, Institute of Plant Industry, St. Petersburg, Russia.) which stated that environmental factors experienced by an organism could be passed off to the offspring Nikolai Vavilov and His Nemesis Trofim (Crow 1993). Building upon Lamarckism, Lysen- Lysenko: Historical Context koists had to develop a new doctrine to replace mutation and chromosome theory. To Lysenko, the It is impossible to discuss the science of Vavilov hereditary unit of a plant was the cell itself. Lysenko without first discussing the historical context in believed that by subjecting the cell to a given which Vavilov worked. Vavilov was born in 1887 environment one could change the plant into a and rose to prominence as a scientist in the mid- more fit variety or plant type (Crow 1993). Lysenko 1920s to lead the All-Union Institute of Botany and theorized that there were certain points in the life of Applied Cultures in the Soviet Union (Figure 1). a plant in which the environment was ‘‘assimilated’’ Vavilov was well connected throughout the world into a plant’s heredity (Medvedev 1970). But at with scientists such as William Bateson and other periods in the life history, a plant would not Hermann Joseph Muller, and incorporated the be influenced by environmental stimuli. Lysenko work of non-Russian scientists into his work— proposed that the stress itself actually caused including the work of Gregor Mendel, Charles changes that would lead to greater stress tolerance Darwin, and Thomas Hunt Morgan (Crow 1993). in plants. As an illustration of this ignorance, Soyfer Vavilov was in no way controversial in his scientific (1989) presents a picture dated 1948, which shows views. He was at the forefront in the mainstream of Lysenko boldly claiming he had even used this scientific thought in the area of genetics and plant method to change Triticum spp. (wheat) into Secale breeding during his career. Vavilov served as vice cereale L. (rye). It must be noted that Lysenko’s president to the 1932 XI International Genetics ideas fit well into political thought at the time, as Conference held in Ithaca, NY, and was elected the Communists held that if Communism created a president of the 1939 XII International Genetics better environment for the people then the people Conference held in Edinburgh, Scotland. Vavilov themselves would improve, and that these improve- saw value in integrating scientific ideas from ments would then be passed on to subsequent 208 N Weed Science 62, April–June 2014 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.35.76, on 26 Sep 2021 at 19:56:00, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-13-00122.1 generations (Roll-Hansen 2005), the correlation Cultivated Plants, comprising 25 separate manu- being that Marxism improves the people just as the scripts. The compilation of the Russian version of conditions in which a plant is grown change the these manuscripts was published in 1987 on the plant and the subsequent plant generations. Inter- 100th anniversary of Vavilov’s birth. The English estingly, Mendelian genetics was seen as anticom- version was published in 1992. As a matter of munist in the Soviet Union at the time and the convenience, this manuscript is cited as ‘‘Vavilov contention between Western and Soviet science over 1992, page number’’ to allow for ease of reference to Mendelian genetics is an example of one of the first this book. propaganda battles of the Cold War (Wolfe 2011). The downfall of Nikolai Vavilov occurred By knowing the past, looking at elements from throughout the 1930s, with the final blow from which crops developed and gathering cultivated Trofim Lysenko occurring in 1935 to 1938, which plants in the ancient centers of agriculture, we led to Vavilov’s eventual death in 1943 (Crow hope to learn soon how to control the historic 1993; Medvedev 1970; Soyfer 1989).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lysenkoism: the Danger of Political Correctness Emily G. Badger
    Badger !0 Lysenkoism: The Danger of Political Correctness Emily G. Badger Senior Division Historical Paper Paper Length: 2,334 words Badger !1 What is truth? A simple definition of truth would be anything that can be tested and proven in a universal process, for example, the scientific method. What happens in an environment where truth is not allowed to be tested? What would the consequences be? Unfortunately, there was a time in history when this was true, and it was strikingly recent. In the late 1920’s Mendelian genetics were replaced by Lysenkoism in Soviet Russia, just before the start of World War II. Though the conflict started as a dispute of truth within scientific circles, it quickly became evident that Lysenko’s underlying motive was not to make scientific discoveries, but to gain political power. The tragic result of politically correct truth replacing scientific truth was mass starvation and ultimately the crippling of a world superpower. To understand how such a catastrophic event could occur, it is necessary to understand the political climate of the Soviet Union at the time. First, it is important to note that Russia was a communist state, which meant there was an intense hatred of anyone who was considered bourgeois, a member of the middle class who upheld the interests of capitalism rather than communism (Collins English Dictionary). Bourgeois members of Russian society were hated because they were property owners; they were not considered to be working for a living and thus were the enemy of Communism. Being called bourgeois in Russia at this time was essentially a death sentence, as those who disagreed with Communist values were “removed” by the government.
    [Show full text]
  • Obi-Wan Kenobi “May the Force Be with You”
    Obi-Wan Kenobi “may the Force be with you” Chinese abacus Mayan abacus Yupana Calculator, Inca Brahmagupta India 598–668 Mu ḥammad ibn M ūsā al-Khw ārizm ī Uzbekistan / Persia 780 – 850 Founder of Algebra On the Calculation with Hindu Numerals translated into Latin as Algoritmi de numero Indorum Aristotle 384 to 322 BCE Why →→→ How The Alchymist, in Search of the Philosophers' Stone by Joseph Wright of Derby, 1771 1661 Robert Boyle (gas volume varies inversely to its pressure) 1787, Antoine Lavoisier (matter is conserved) Nicolas Flamel France (1330 – 1418) (died at age 88) Imaginative portrait. Abraham the Jew: Levite, Astronomer & philosopher. To the Jewish people that is in exile in France due to the fury of God. Hello in the name of the God of Israel. Prophecy Metal transformation City of Leon the substance of the eternal spirit emerged. Aristotle 384 to 322 BCE Why →→→ How Galileo Galilei 1564 – 1642 Aristotle Why →→→ How Galileo challenge Greek philosophy Newton science = how ; religion = why Sir Isaac Newton 1643 – 1727 Force ~ motion change Sir Isaac Newton 1643 – 1727 Why bother? Moving objects ? 1 + 1 = 1.9 Albert Einstein 1879 – 1955 E = m c 2 Trofim Denisovich Lysenko speaking at the Kremlin in 1935 Claiming x3 to x4 wheat crop Imprisoned and died Due to Lysenko Isaak Agol, Solomon Levit, Grigorii Levitskii, Georgii Karpechenko, Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov Georgii Nadson, world's largest collection of plant seeds November 1887 (Moscow city) Nikolai Vavilov – January 1943 (Moscow prison) (of malnutrition) Many more … NSF Grant No. DMR-0619458 NSF Grant No. CBET-0960229 Guillaume Amontons, 1663 – 1705 Friction ~ load Charles-Augustin de Coulomb 1736 – 1806 David Tabor (23 October 1913 – 26 November 2005) Friction ~ contact area Lamar University, Dec 2009 Drop Friction ~ Inverse of Load Drop Friction ~ Inverse of contact area Centrifugal Adhesion Balance CAB Centrifugal Adhesion Balance, CAB Waiting! NSF Grant No.
    [Show full text]
  • Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov: Plant Geographer, Geneticist, Martyr
    Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov: Plant Geographer, Geneticist, Martyr of Science Jules Janick1 Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN Additional index words. centers of origin, centers of diversity, germplasm, plant breeding Abstract. Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov (1887–1943), one of the pioneers of 20th century plant breeding, is best known for seminal work in identifying centers of origins and diversity for cultivated plants. Vavilov studied genetics with William Bateson from 1913 to 1914 at the John Innis Horticultural Institute. In 1921, he was chosen by Vladimir Lenin to head the Branch of Applied Botany in Petrograd (St. Petersburg) and rose to be the Director of the All-Union Institute of Agriculture in Leningrad, where he oversaw agricultural research for the entire country. By 1934, Vavilov established more than 400 research institutes and experiment stations with a staff of 20,000. His efforts established the Soviet Union as a world leader in genetics and plant breeding in the 1920s and early 1930s. Vavilov carried out an extensive series of expeditions worldwide, including the United States, to collect germplasm; and he created the world’s largest repository, over 250,000 seed accessions. However, as a result of famine in the Soviet Union in the late 1920s, partly as a result of forced collectivization of peasants, Vavilov came in conflict with an ambitious agronomist, Trofim Lysenko, who came to prominence with an agricultural technique proposed in 1928, of exposing chilled, soaked seeds of wheat (dubbed vernalization) to extend production in northern areas of Russia. Lysenko’s rejection of Mendelian genetics won the support of Joseph Stalin, leading to the arrest and death sentence of Vavilov, although this was later commuted to 20 years imprisonment.
    [Show full text]
  • Nikolai Ivanovic Vavilov (1887-1943) [1]
    Published on The Embryo Project Encyclopedia (https://embryo.asu.edu) Nikolai Ivanovic Vavilov (1887-1943) [1] By: Baranski, Marci Keywords: Law of Homologous Lines [2] Vavilov Research Institute of Plant Industry [3] Lysenkoism [4] agricultural science [5] Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov proposed theories of plant genetic diversity and participated in the political debate about genetics in Russia in the early twentieth century. Vavilov collected plant species around the world, building one of the first and most comprehensive seed banks, and he spent much of his life researching plant breeding and genetics. Vavilov also developed a theory of the historical centers of origin of cultivated plants. Vavilov spent most of his scientific career in Russia, although he studied abroad and traveled extensively. The ascent of geneticist Trofim Lysenko, favored by Joseph Stalin, and Vavilov's public criticism of Lysenko lead to Vavilov's arrest in 1940 and his death in prison three years later. Vavilov was born in Moscow, Russia, on 25 November 1887 to Aleksandra Mikhailovna and Ivan Ilich Vavilov, a wealthy merchant. Vavilov had three younger siblings: his sister Alexandra, who became a doctor; his sister Lydia, who studied microbiology but died in 1913 due to smallpox; and his brother Sergei, who became a physicist and later president of the Soviet Academy of Sciences. Vavilov began his undergraduate studies in 1908 at the Timiryazev Academy of Agriculture (formerly the Moscow Agricultural Institute) in Moscow, studying genetics and horticulture. Vavilov studied plant immunity and Charles Darwin [6]'s 1859 theory of evolution [7], and his undergraduate thesis was on slugs, titled, "Golye slizni (ulitki), povrezhdayushchie polya i ogorody v Moskovskoy gubernii" (Destructive Slugs of the Fields and Gardens of Moscow Province's).
    [Show full text]
  • Corinto G.L. Cultivation As Taking Care of Plant Diversity and Global
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTHROPOLOGY Vol. 33 - n. 3-4 (203-217) - 2018 Corinto G.L. Cultivation as Taking Care of Plant Department of Education, Cultural Heritage and Diversity and Global Commons: Tourism, University of Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov’s Legacy Macerata, Italy Email: gianluigi.corinto unimc.it Biodiversity and agrobiodiversity are global commons and hu- mans should well understand the necessity of managing natural and farm induced plant variability at world level. In the 1930s, DOI: 10.14673/IJA2018341034 Russian geneticist, botanist and geographer Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov carried out worldwide researches on plant variety, col- lecting and storing germplams of all world major crops. His vi- sion on world centers of origin of cultivated plants is outdated, but his scientific ideas on plant geographical diversity preceded the ongoing concerns for loss of plant variability. In fact, even today FAO considers areas originally individuated by Vavilov as global priority genetic reserve locations for wild relatives of 12 main food crops. Both storing and farming will assure so- KEY WORDS: cultivation, commons, cieties productive and conservative services, and studying the Vavilov’s centers, biodiversity, geographical diversity of plants is a strong necessity for assur- agrobiodiversity ing sustainability on a global scale. Introduction: Biodiversity and Agrobiodiversity Prominent scholar Thomas Lovejoy coined the locution biological diversity in the early 1980s, while the word biodiversity appeared in a print publication in 1988 when entomologist Edward O. Wilson used it as the title of the proceedings of the 1985 forum during which Walter G. Rosen first proposed this term (Farnham, 2007). Since then, success in common language was constantly increasing, even though long before many other thinkers, scientists, men, and women of culture and practitioners had placed the concept of biodiversity at the center of their attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Trofim Lysenko and Genetics in Soviet Russia (1927-1962)
    Trofim Lysenko and genetics in Soviet Russia (1927-1962) Bibliography 1. V. Soifer, Lysenko and the tragedy of Soviet science, Rutgers, 1994 2. D. Joravsky, The Lysenko affair, Cambridge University Press,1970 3. W. Gratzer, The undegrowth of science, Oxford University Press, 2000 Genetics n the branch of biology that studies heredity and variations in living organisms n I will discuss how genetics was declared a pseudo-science in a large country for more than thirty years n We will also try to understand the reasons behind this unfortunate story Timeline Morgan: DNA discovery 1953 chromosome studies 1933 Russian revolution 1917 Lysenko’s influence Lamarck Darwin Mendel Stalin’s rule 1790 1810 1830 1850 1870 1890 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 Charles Robert Darwin (1809-1882) §Formulated the evolution theory in his book “The Origin of Species” §“… in the struggle for existence, …, favourable variations would tend to be preserved, and unfavourable ones to be destroyed. The results of this would be the formation of a new species.” How are structural changes passed from one generation to another? Darwin 1790 1810 1830 1850 1870 1890 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744-1829) §Developed a classification of animals and plants based on their structural characteristics §Suggested that hereditary changes accumulate during the lifetime of an organism under the influence of environmental stimuli §These accumulated changes are then passed to the next generation Lamarck Darwin 1790 1810 1830 1850 1870 1890 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of the Soviet Agricultural Research System for the Republics of Central Asia and Caucasus
    Discussion Paper No 99-1 January 1999 The Legacy of the Soviet Agricultural Research System for the Republics of Central Asia and Caucasus Alexei Morgunov Larry Zuidema Discussion Papers are preliminary reports of work in progress at the International Service for National Agricultural Research (ISNAR). They are intended to stimulate discussion and elicit comments from interested professionals both within and outside ISNAR. They are not official ISNAR publications, they are not edited or reviewed by ISNAR, and their circulation is restricted. Discussion Papers reflect the views of the authors but not necessarily those of ISNAR. They may be cited with the author’s permission and due acknowledgment. International Service for National Agricultural Research (ISNAR) P.O Box 93375 2509AJ The Hague The Netherlands Tel: (+31) (70) 3496100 Fax: (+31) (70) 381 9677 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.cgiar.org/isnar Contents Acknowledgments 1. Introduction 2. Agricultural Research in the Academy of Agricultural Sciences in the Soviet Union (1918-1991) 2.1 Historical Development 2.2 National Structure and Resources 2.3 Management of Agricultural Research 2.4 National and International Linkages 3. Evaluation of the USSR Academy of Agricultural Sciences (1929-1991) 3.1 Advantages 3.2 Disadvantages 4. The Development of National Agricultural Research Systems in the Republics (1991-1998) 4.1 Armenia 4.2 Azerbaijan 4.3 Georgia 4.4 Kazakstan 4.5 Kyrgyzstan 4.6 Tadjikistan 4.7 Turkmenistan 4.8 Uzbekistan 4.9 Russia 4.10 Ukraine 5. Future Prospects for Agricultural Research Reforms in the Republics 5.1 Current Trends in Reforming Agricultural Research 5.2 Application of Strategies for Reforming Agricultural Research 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanist Interior 43.1
    2012 THE MICHIGAN BOTANIST 85 BOOK REVIEWS Pringle, Peter. 2008. The Murder of Nikolai Vavilov: The Story of Stalin’s Persecution of One of the Great Scientists of the Twentieth Century . New York. Simon & Schuster. 370 pp. ISBN-13: 978-0-7432-6498-3. $26.00. Hardbound. In this captivating biography of the Russian plant geneticist/botanist Nikolai Vavilov, Pringle tells the story of how one of the twentieth centuries greatest botanists who dreamed of feeding the world died of starvation. Though he worked for numerous years for the Russian state, Vavilov was persecuted, incarcerated, interrogated and very likely tortured by Stalin’s communist regime for his unwavering confidence in Mendelian ge - netics. Vavilov, as portrayed by Pringle, was a passionate man full of energy, insatiable cu - riosity and unrelenting drive. He was first and foremost a scientist, though Pringle also devotes time to discussing Vavilov’s family life. And though many of the charges brought against Vavilov by the KGB were of subterfuge and disloyalty to the motherland, Pringle works throughout the biography to show Vavilov as the incomparable patriot he is re - vealed to be in numerous personal journals, letters, interviews and records. Vavilov even tried to convince American contemporaries working at the time with T. H. Morgan to come to Russia and join him in his botanical cross breeding experiments. Of those who accepted Vavilov’s invitation, only a few lived through the closing of Stalin’s fist around scientists he deemed to be too theoretical. Fueled in part by the common suspicion of the time that academics, particularly those well born, did not have the interests of the common people at heart, the U.S.S.R eventu - ally stalled biological advancement in the motherland by fully backing the work of the uneducated would-be scientist, Forim Lysenko.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Vernalization
    1 From spring & winter wheat to the Lamarckist transmutation theory, to the tragedies of 2 Lysenkoism in Soviet Russia, to the elusive florigen and plant natural variation & 3 epigenetics research: Here’s... 4 A Short History of Vernalization 5 Marc Somssich 6 Persson Lab, School of BioSciences, the University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, VIC, Australia 7 Email: [email protected] ; Twitter: @somssichm 8 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3660691 9 10 Humans have known for centuries that some plants would only flower and produce yield in 11 late spring or summer if they are planted and germinated before winter1. Such crop plants 12 display an enhanced cold tolerance, and survive through winter with the help of a protective 13 layer of snow, sheltering them from freezing1. The benefit of growing such winter varieties is 14 that they produce higher yield than spring varieties1. Importantly, such winter varieties don’t 15 just tolerate winter weather – they actually require it, as they won’t flower at all without this 16 period of cold1. Today, this cold treatment is designated ‘vernalization’. 17 Spring vs. Winter Wheat – Different Plants or Different Environments? (1800s) 18 Around the year 1800 it was still a matter of debate what caused the difference in behavior 19 between spring and winter varieties of the same crop1,2. According to John Lawrence, a 20 farmer and author of the 1800 ‘New Farmer's Calendar’, ‘it has been disputed, whether any 21 specific difference exists between spring and winter wheat’2. The question at the time was, if 22 these are actually different plants, or if their behavior was simply modified by their 23 environment2.
    [Show full text]
  • President of Stalin' S Academy
    President of Stalin' s Academy The Mask and Responsibility of Sergei Vavilov By Alexei Kojevnikov * T HAS BECOME A CLICH$ when speaking about Sergei Vavilov (1891-1951), to I start with a dramatic comparison of two fates: that of Sergei himself-a high-ranking official, president of the Soviet Academy of Sciences at the apogee of Stalin's rule, 1945- 1951; and that of his brother Nikolai-a famous geneticist who became a victim of the purges and starved in prison in 1943. Although the general reader may find it paradoxical, such a pattern was not unusual for that epoch. Participants in political games accepted the cruelty and dangers of that life as inevitable, and even Politburo members-Viacheslav Molotov and Mikhail Kalinin--could have convicts among their closest relatives. Sergei Vavilov proved himself a true politician who both administered the scientific academy and delivered the required political speeches during a time characterized by the cold war, Communist totalitarianism, nationalism (including anti-Semitism), Stalin's personality cult, and ideological purges in culture and science. He managed to perform this job without committing any major political mistakes and died in 1951 in full official recognition; Nikita Khrushchev, speaking at his funeral, called Vavilov a "non-Party Bolshevik," a laudatory term for one who was not formally a member of the Communist Party.' (See Figure 1.) However, Vavilov did not fit any of the stereotypical images of Soviet officials-the rude and energetic revolutionary, the gloomy apparatchik, and so forth. He was a phleg- matic and solitary intellectual whose hobby was searching for rare books among the heaps in secondhand bookstores and who translated Isaac Newton's Lectiones opticae into Rus- sian.
    [Show full text]
  • *31.7 Books.Indd NS AB NEW.Indd
    NATURE|Vol 454|31 July 2008 SUMMER BOOKS OPINION edge and extension at the trailing edge. as T. rex’s crater of doom by proving it was with others, including my late professor, Derek Alvarez leads us to this hypothesis along a 300,000 years too old. Alvarez’s frequent refer- Ager, he has helped geologists to understand personal and scientific journey through many ences to the crater as the uncontested ‘smoking that uniformitarianism and gradualism are not scientific, historical and cultural byways. gun’ would otherwise, presumably, have been the same thing. On the timescale of a planet, The book reads like an extended field guide phrased more circumspectly. uniformity must also embrace rare, catastrophic and notebook — Alvarez mingles the story of Like Alvarez’s previous book, The Mountains events that may recur on timescales far beyond his involvement with Italian geologists with of St Francis is a first-person participant history. the duration of civilizations and even species. accounts of his travels, discoveries and what This genre carries dangers, not least the pitfall Whatever the truth behind his sometimes might be called an Italian history of the world, of overplaying the author’s centrality. Alvarez is overconfident side-statements about the end- in which various historical figures receive given to grand gesture, and sometimes allows Cretaceous extinction, meteorite impacts, the proper credit for thinking of things first. himself to come too close to writing what iridium anomaly, Chicxulub crater and science Many of them, such as the seventeenth-cen- Stephen Jay Gould dubbed “cardboard history”. history, the tectonic story running through this tury Danish geologist Nicolaus Steno, need no For example, he avers that, by the 1930s, Alfred book is compelling and engagingly told.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Law in Ukraine: from the Roots to the Bud
    UCLA UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy Title Environmental Law in Ukraine: From the Roots to the Bud Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6bd236s5 Journal UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 11(2) Author Sak, Pamela Bickford Publication Date 1993 DOI 10.5070/L5112018804 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Environmental Law in Ukraine: From the Roots to the Bud Pamela Bickford Sak* For me, it is the same if I have many suits and a lot of gold, but I die tomorrow. Why do I need these suits and gold? Ecology is life. That's why ecology is in the first place and economy is in the second.' INTRODUCTION Environmentalism is vital to Ukraine's survival. Yet the institu- tion of an effective environmental protection system is linked pre- cariously to the democratization and privatization processes. Consequently, Ukraine's environmentalists must emerge victorious over bureaucracy and industry. To date, Ukraine's environmental- ists have not been passive, having secured positions of political power, a strong democratic foundation, and popular support. Therefore, environmentalists may succeed in restoring and preserv- ing Ukraine's environment. In this paper, I examine how Ukraine has come so desperately to need an environmental movement and why its environmentalists may succeed. Part I is a brief introduction to Ukraine. The parts which follow look at the pre-Soviet period (II), the Soviet period (III), and the transition period (IV). Specifically, this paper exam- ines the environmental ethics, players, and regulations for each of these periods. * J.D., National Law Center, George Washington University, May 1993; B.A.
    [Show full text]