DOCSLIB.ORG

Project No. 2012/302922

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project No. 2012/302922 European Commission Mid-term review of the Cocaine Route Programme financed by the EU Instrument for Stability Final Report Project No. 2012/302922 This project is funded by A project implemented by The European Commission HTSPE Limited HTSPE Limited Thamesfield House Boundary Way Hemel Hempstead Herts HP2 7SR United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 1442 202400 Fax: +44 (0) 1442 266438 Email: [email protected] Web: www.htspe.com EuroTrends 43, rue d’Aboukir 75002 Paris France Tel: +33-1-42 22 93 30 Web: www.euro-trends.net Expert 1 – Axel KLEIN Expert 2 – Stella Aku ATTAKPAH Expert 3 – Sergio URIBE This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of HTSPE Limited and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. June 2013 (5012121) Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................................ 3 LIST OF ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................. 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 8 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 13 1.1 Security and Development .......................................................................................... 13 1.2 The Cocaine Route Programme .................................................................................. 13 2.3 The Mid-term Review ................................................................................................. 15 3. FINDINGS ...................................................................................................................... 16 3.1 The Evaluation Questions ........................................................................................... 16 3.2 Relevance .................................................................................................................... 16 3.3 Design ......................................................................................................................... 23 4. EFFECTIVENESS .............................................................................................................. 26 4.1 Delivery of planned benefits and results: fighting against organised crime groups .. 26 4.2 Enhancing the Cooperation Capacity of Law Enforcement and Judicial Authorities at Regional and Trans-Regional Level .......................................................................................... 27 5. EFFICIENCY .................................................................................................................... 28 5.1 Management arrangements and coordination .......................................................... 28 5.2 Management, planning and implementation ............................................................ 29 5.3 Information management and deadlines ................................................................... 30 5.4 Project management .................................................................................................. 30 6. IMPACT ......................................................................................................................... 32 6.1 Achievement of project objectives: human security ................................................... 32 6.2 Impact on development benefits ................................................................................ 33 6.3 Impact on beneficiary agencies .................................................................................. 34 6.4 From network to institution building - AMERIPOL...................................................... 35 6.5 Shifting the focus from organised crime - the challenge of PRELAC........................... 36 7. SUSTAINABILITY ............................................................................................................ 37 7.1 Ownership ................................................................................................................... 37 7.2 Policy Support ............................................................................................................. 37 7.3 Institutional capacity .................................................................................................. 38 7.4 Local perceptions ........................................................................................................ 39 8 COHERENCE ................................................................................................................... 40 8.1 Project Overlaps and Complementarity...................................................................... 40 8.1.1 COPOLAD .................................................................................................................... 40 8.1.2 Projects in West Africa ................................................................................................ 42 3 8.2 Supporting development and EU values ..................................................................... 42 9. EC VALUE ADDED - WHAT IS THE ADDED VALUE OF IFS SUPPORT FOR THE CRP?.............. 43 9.1 The appropriateness of IfS funding for the CRP against guiding principles................ 43 10. VISIBILITY .................................................................................................................. 47 11. OVERALL ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................. 47 11.1 Identifying the Threat of Organised Crime ................................................................. 47 11.2 Lessons learnt ............................................................................................................. 48 12. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................. 51 12.1 Methodological issues ................................................................................................ 51 12.2 The project design and the IfS .................................................................................... 52 12.3 Programme management and coordination .............................................................. 53 12.4 Capacity enhancement for "international cooperation of law enforcement and judicial services" ...................................................................................................................... 54 12.5 Judicial component ..................................................................................................... 54 12.6 International cooperation - at regional level .............................................................. 55 12.7 Trans-regional cooperation ........................................................................................ 55 12.8 The relationship with partners ................................................................................... 55 12.9 Coherence with EU policies ......................................................................................... 56 12.10 Information / analysis ............................................................................................ 58 13. RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................ 58 ANNEX 1 – TERMS OF REFERENCE .......................................................................................... 64 ANNEX 2 – THE EVALUATION TEAM ....................................................................................... 93 ANNEX 3 – LOGFRAME ........................................................................................................... 96 ANNEX 4 – EVALUATION QUESTIONS AND RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS .....................................101 ANNEX 5 – METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................................116 ANNEX 6 – LIST OF INTERVIEWS AND CONSULTATIONS ..........................................................122 ANNEX 7 – LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONSULTED ........................................................................131 ANNEX 8 – PROJECT SUMMARIES ..........................................................................................135 ANNEX 9 – MISSION REPORT, WEST AFRICA ..........................................................................152 ANNEX 10 – PERFORMANCE OF THE CONTRACTORS ..............................................................159 ANNEX 11 – DRUG SEIZURES FROM AIRCOP AND SEACOP ......................................................163 ANNEX 12 – DRUG OFFENDERS IN THE PRISON POPULATION IN LATIN AMERICA ....................166 ANNEX 13 – MAPPING OF DRUGS, SECURITY AND JUSTICE-RELATED RELEVANT PROJECTS ......168 4 List of Acronyms AAP Annual Action Programme AD Alternative Development AFRICOM Africa Command AIRCOP Airport Cooperation Programme AIAMP Asociación Ibero Americana de Ministerios Públicos AMERIPOL American Police Community AML Anti-money laundering AUC Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia BKA BundesKriminalAmt BNI Bureau of National Investigation CELAC Comunidad de Estados Latinoamericanos y Caribeños CENcomm WCO Customs Enforcement Network communication system CENTIF Cellule National de Traitement des informations Financières CFATF Caribbean Financial Action Task Force CFT Counter financing of terrorism CIFAD Centre
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Special Report No 9/2016 EU External Migration Spending in Southern
    Special Report No 9/2016 (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) EU external migration spending in Southern Mediterranean and Eastern Neighbourhood countries until 2014 together with the replies of the Commission 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi - L - 1615 Luxembourg T (+352) 4398 – 1 E [email protected] eca.europa.eu 2 CONTENTS Paragraph Abbreviations and acronyms Glossary Executive summary I - V Introduction 1 - 20 EU external migration policy 2 - 20 The policy framework 2 - 5 A global approach to external migration 6 - 8 Priority given to neighbourhood countries 9 Varied institutional and financial instruments 10 - 11 Different sources of the EU's external migration spending 12 - 16 Financing and management arrangements 17 - 20 Audit scope and approach 21 - 26 Coherence of objectives, identification of partner country needs and monitoring instruments need improving 27 - 65 A wide range of policy objectives not always interlinked 27 - 31 Identification of partner countries’ needs requires better attention 32 - 37 Monitoring and assessment instruments need improving 38 - 51 Geographic and thematic priorities were difficult to verify 52 - 60 Intervention spread over a wide geographical area 61 - 65 Weaknesses affected the effectiveness of the EU's external migration spending (TPMA and ENPI) in the Southern Mediterranean and the Eastern Partnership countries 66 - 89 Shortcomings in operational objectives and result indicators made projects’ effectiveness difficult to assess 67 - 69 Factors hindering effectiveness 70 - 73
    [Show full text]
  • Motion: Europe Is Worth It – for a Green Recovery Rooted in Solidarity and A
    German Bundestag Printed paper 19/20564 19th electoral term 30 June 2020 version Preliminary Motion tabled by the Members of the Bundestag Agnieszka Brugger, Anja Hajduk, Dr Franziska Brantner, Sven-Christian Kindler, Dr Frithjof Schmidt, Margarete Bause, Kai Gehring, Uwe Kekeritz, Katja Keul, Dr Tobias Lindner, Omid Nouripour, Cem Özdemir, Claudia Roth, Manuel Sarrazin, Jürgen Trittin, Ottmar von Holtz, Luise Amtsberg, Lisa Badum, Danyal Bayaz, Ekin Deligöz, Katja Dörner, Katharina Dröge, Britta Haßelmann, Steffi Lemke, Claudia Müller, Beate Müller-Gemmeke, Erhard Grundl, Dr Kirsten Kappert-Gonther, Maria Klein-Schmeink, Christian Kühn, Stephan Kühn, Stefan Schmidt, Dr Wolfgang Strengmann-Kuhn, Markus Tressel, Lisa Paus, Tabea Rößner, Corinna Rüffer, Margit Stumpp, Dr Konstantin von Notz, Dr Julia Verlinden, Beate Walter-Rosenheimer, Gerhard Zickenheiner and the Alliance 90/The Greens parliamentary group be to Europe is worth it – for a green recovery rooted in solidarity and a strong 2021- 2027 EU budget the by replaced The Bundestag is requested to adopt the following resolution: I. The German Bundestag notes: A strong European Union (EU) built on solidarity which protects its citizens and our livelihoods is the best investment we can make in our future. Our aim is an EU that also and especially proves its worth during these difficult times of the corona pandemic, that fosters democracy, prosperity, equality and health and that resolutely tackles the challenge of the century that is climate protection. We need an EU that bolsters international cooperation on the world stage and does not abandon the weakest on this earth. proofread This requires an EU capable of taking effective action both internally and externally, it requires greater solidarity on our continent and beyond - because no country can effectively combat the climate crisis on its own, no country can stamp out the pandemic on its own.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Thematic Instruments
    1. Thematic instruments 1.1. Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation (INSC) The Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation (INSC) was established following Council Regulation (Euratom) no 300/2007 of 19 February 2007,1 replacing and widening the TACIS Nuclear Safety Programme,2 which had been established to help prevent nuclear incidents in the former USSR satellite states. The INSC aims to fund actions from a broad range of stakeholders and cover the promotion and development of an effective regulatory framework for nuclear safety (including materials and radiation protection). It also allows for the provision of tech- nical support to nuclear stakeholders in 15 countries (at national, local or regional level with private companies, NGOs, the Joint Research Centre (JRC), EU agencies and international organisations). Adopted following the ordinary legislation procedure3 and based on the multiannu- al strategy programme,4 €524 million have been allocated to the INSC for the 2007- 2013 period. The Instrument is implemented through annual action programmes. A margin of manoeuvre is preserved as it is possible to engage in emergency or sup- port measures without clear prior indications in the multiannual strategy paper. For example, a nuclear incident requires urgent safety measures and cannot be planned explicitly into a multiannual strategic programme. On 25 January 2013, a new cooperation mechanism5 was established between the EU and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).6 Once adopted, the new multian- nual financial framework should have a budget of €560 million for the period 2014- 1. See: Council Regulation n°300/2007 of 19 February 2007 establishing an Instrument for Nuclear Safety Coop- eration: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:081:0001:0010:EN:PDF.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Eu Foreign Policy Architecture
    THE NEW EU FOREIGN POLICY ARCHITECTURE REVIEWING THE FIRST TWO YEARS OF THE EEAS NIKLAS HELWIG PAUL IVAN HRANT KOSTANYAN CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN POLICY STUDIES (CEPS) BRUSSELS The Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) is an independent policy research institute in Brussels. Its mission is to produce sound policy research leading to constructive solutions to the challenges facing Europe. The views expressed in this book are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed to CEPS or any other institution with which they are associated or to the European Union. Niklas Helwig is a Marie Curie Researcher of the EXACT network at the University of Edinburgh and Cologne and focuses on the institutional development of EU foreign policy. He worked for the Centre for European Policy Studies and the Finnish Institute of International Affairs. Paul Ivan is a Romanian diplomat. Previously, he worked as a researcher for the Centre for European Policy Studies, where he focused on EU political and institutional issues and the European External Action Service. Hrant Kostanyan is an associate research fellow at CEPS and a PhD candidate at the Centre for EU Studies at Ghent University. He worked as an external expert for International Alert, based in London, in the Eastern Europe and South Caucasus research project. He also worked as an expert on a European Commission-funded project on the EU’s relations with Russia and the Eastern Partnership at the EU Neighbourhood Info Centre. The authors thank Piotr Maciej Kaczyński for his comments on an earlier draft. ISBN 978-94-6138-262-7 © Copyright 2013, Centre for European Policy Studies and the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • EU Policy Towards Its Eastern Neighbours
    OÂRODEK STUDIÓW WSCHODNICH IM. MARKA KARPIA CENTRE FOR EASTERN STUDIES INTEGRATION OR IMITATION? EU policy towards its Eastern Neighbours K a t a r z y n a P e ł c z y ƒ s k a - N a ł ´ c z The author would like to thank Ms Katarzyna Jarzyƒska for her assistance in the preparation of the source materials The paper was prepared within the framework of the IFRI-OSW research programme N U M E R / I S S U E 3 6 W A R S Z A W A , K W I E C I E ¡ 2 0 1 1 PRACE OSW W A R S A W , A P R I L 2 0 1 1 O S W S T U D I E S © Copyright by OÊrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia Editor Anna ¸abuszewska Co-operation Katarzyna Kazimierska Translation Ilona Duchnowicz Co-operation Nicholas Furnival, Timothy Harrell Graphic design Dorota Nowacka Publisher OÊrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia / Centre for Eastern Studies ul. Koszykowa 6a, Warszawa / Warsaw, Poland phone + 48 /22/ 525 80 00 fax +48 /22/ 525 80 40 osw.waw.pl ISBN 978-83-62936-00-7 Contents INTEGRATION OR IMITATION? EU policy towards its Eastern Neighbours Introduction / 5 Executive Summary / 8 Part I. Eastern neighbourhood – how far from the European Union? / 14 Part II. The Eastern vector of the neighbourhood policy / 29 Postscript. How to avoid the pretence? / 55 INTEGRATION OR IMITATION? EU policy towards its Eastern Neighbours Introduction The European Union’s policy towards the six post-Soviet countries, Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova, Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan, has entered a new phase since 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy 2010
    STRATEGY 2010 What Direction for European Development Policy? Directorate-General of Global Affairs, Development and Partnerships French Proposals DIRECTORATE-GENERAL OF GLOBAL AffaIRS, DEVELOPMENT AND PARTNERSHIPS WHAT DIRECTION FOR EUROPEAN DEVELOPMENT POLICY? FRENCH PROPOSALS Évaluation réalisée par : Pluricité Nicolas Subileau Alix de Saint-Albin Michel Hoffert Synthèse du rapport (français et russe) Rapport remis en décembre 2009 MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AND EUROPEAN AFFAIRS contentS Acknowledgements This document would not have been possible without the active participation and input from various Directorates of the Ministry for Foreign and European Affairs (MAEE), the Ministry of the Economy, Industry and Employment (MINEIE), the French Development Agency (AFD), the Ministry of Immigration, National Identity, Integration and Co-development (MIIIDS), the Ministry of the Interior, Overseas France and Territorial Communities (MIOMCT), the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries (MAAP), the Ministry of Ecology, Energy, Sustainable Development and the Sea (MEEDEM), the Ministry of Defence and the Secretariat General for European Affairs (SGAE). The document was also enriched by consultations with civil society. The layout of this document was prepared by European Development Policy Pole of the Directorate General of Global Affairs, Development and Partnerships (DGM), which organised the consultation meetings. The following people also participated in different ways in the discussions, drafting and review of this document: For the MAEE:
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Urban Dimension of the Security Sector
    Examining the Urban Dimension of the Security Sector Research Report Project Title: Providing Security in Urban Environments: The Role of Security Sector Governance and Reform Project supported by the Folke Bernadotte Academy (FBA) and the Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) February 2018 Authors (in alphabetical order): Andrea Florence de Mello Aguiar, Lea Ellmanns, Ulrike Franke, Praveen Gunaseelan, Gustav Meibauer, Carmen Müller, Albrecht Schnabel, Usha Trepp, Raphaël Zaffran, Raphael Zumsteg 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents Authors Acknowledgements List of Abbreviations 1 Introduction: The New Urban Security Disorder 1.1 Puzzle and research problem 1.2 Purpose and research objectives 1.3 Research questions 1.4 Research hypotheses 1.5 Methodology 1.6 Outline of the project report 2 Studying the Security Sector in Urban Environments 2.1 Defining the urban context 2.2 Urbanisation trends 2.3 Urban security challenges 2.4 Security provision in urban contexts 2.5 The ‘generic’ urban security sector 2.6 Defining SSG and SSR: from national to urban contexts 3 The Urban SSG/R Context: Urban Threats and Urban Security Institutions 3.1 The urban SSG/R context: a microcosm of national SSG/R contexts 3.2 The urban environment: priority research themes and identified gaps 3.3 Excursus: The emergence of a European crime prevention policy 3.4 Threats prevalent and/or unique to the urban context – and institutions involved in threat mitigation 3.5 The urban security sector: key security, management and oversight institutions
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of the Interior
    Republic of Ghana MEDIUM TERM EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK (MTEF) FOR 2020-2023 MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR PROGRAMME BASED BUDGET ESTIMATES For 2020 Republic of Ghana MINISTRY OF FINANCE Responsive, Ethical, Ecient, Professional – Transforming Ghana Beyond Aid Finance Drive, Ministries-Accra Digital Address: GA - 144-2024 M40, Accra - Ghana +233 302-747-197 [email protected] mofep.gov.gh @ministryofinanceghana © 2019. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the Ministry of Finance On the Authority of His Excellency Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo, President of the Republic of Ghana MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR i | 2020 BUDGET ESTIMATES The MoI MTEF PBB for 2020 is also available on the internet at: www.mofep.gov.gh ii | 2020 BUDGET ESTIMATES Contents PART A: STRATEGIC OVERVIEW OF THE MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR .......... 2 1. MTDPF POLICY OBJECTIVES ........................................................................ 2 2. GOAL ............................................................................................................... 2 3. CORE FUNCTIONS ......................................................................................... 2 4. POLICY OUTCOME INDICATORS AND TARGETS ........................................ 3 5. EXPENDITURE TRENDS FOR THE MEDIUM-TERM ..................................... 4 6. SUMMARY OF KEY ACHIEVEMENTS IN 2019 .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • MINISTRY of the INTERIOR Management 45 47 53 53 55 55 Educational Letters Issued Institutions Greater Accra
    Past Years Projections Output Republic of Ghana Main Outputs Budget Indicative Indicative Indicative Indicator 2017 2018 Year Year Year Year 2019 2020 2021 2022 Number of Audit of MMDAs Management 27 27 27 27 27 27 MEDIUM leTERMtters issued EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK (MTEF) Number of Audit of MDA Management 275 280 360 360 375 375 Agencies FOR 2019-2022 letters issued Audit of Number of Traditional Management 5 5 15 15 15 15 Councils letters issued Audit of Pre- Number of tertiary MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR Management 45 47 53 53 55 55 Educational letters issued Institutions Greater Accra Region NuPROGRAMMEmber of BASED BUDGET ESTIMATES Audit of MMDAs Management 16 For16 20191 6 16 16 16 letters issued Number of Audit of MDA Management 146 150 170 170 190 190 Agencies letters issued Audit of Number of Traditional Management 5 5 6 6 6 6 Councils letters issued Audit of Pre- Number of tertiary Management 33 37 43 43 45 45 Educational letters issued Institutions Central Region Number of Audit of MMDAs Management 20 20 20 20 20 20 letters issued Number of Audit of MDA Management 198 200 260 260 265 265 Agencies letters issued Audit of Number of Traditional Management 5 5 15 15 15 15 Councils letters issued Audit of Pre- Number of tertiary Management 63 62 75 75 70 70 Educational letters issued Institutions Western Region On the Authority of His Excellency Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo, 22 | President of the Republic of Ghana 2019 BUDGET ESTIMATES i | 2019 BUDGET ESTIMATES MINISTRY OFPast Yea rTHEs INTERIORProjections Output Main Outputs Budget Indicative
    [Show full text]
  • UN Police Magazine 8
    8th edition, January 2012 MAGAZINE United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations asdf Sustainable Peace through Justice and Security January 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS 8th Edition [ INTRODUCTION ] [ BUILDING NATIONAL CAPACITY ] 1 ] United Nations Police Play an Invaluable Role 8 ] Peace: Keep it. Build it. Ban Ki-moon, United Nations Secretary-General Dmitry Titov, Assistant Secretary-General Office of 2 ] Helping to Build Accountable Police Services Rule of Law and Security Institutions, Hervé Ladsous, Under-Secretary-General Department of Peacekeeping Operations Department of Peacekeeping Operations 5 ] UN Policing 3 ] Professionalism: UN Policing 2012 6 ] Côte D’Ivoire Ann-Marie Orler, United Nations Police Adviser 7 ] Democratic Republic of the Congo 9 ] Haiti [ UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL EFFORT ] 12 ] Liberia 13 ] South Sudan 20 ] International Network of Female Police 17 ] Special Political Missions Peacekeepers launched at IAWP 24 ] International Female Police Peacekeeper Award 2011 26 ] Sexual and Gender Based Violence Training [ FACTS & FIGURES ] 19 ] Top Ten Contributors of UN Police [ POLICE DIVISION ] 22 ] Actual/Authorized/Female Deployment of UN Police in Peacekeeping Missions 28 ] Consolidating Formed Police Units 27 ] Top Ten Contributors of Female UN 29 ] UNPOL and Interpol: Global Partnership Police Officers 31 ] All Points Bulletin 37 ] FPU Deployment 32 ] Policiers Francophones l’ONU a besoin de vous ! 38 ] UN Police Contributing Countries (PCCs) 33 ] Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie 39 ] Police Division Staff 36 ] Harnessing Technology for Efficiency Photo caption: UN and PNTL officers conducting a foot 37 ] Deputy Police Adviser Shoaib Dastgir patrol on market day in Atauro, Timor-Leste. (UN Photo/Martine Perret) Cover illustration: Conor Hughes/United Nations PROFESSIONAL Service – LASTING IMPACT UNITED NATIONS POLICE PLAY AN INVALUABLE ROLE Since UN Police are typically deployed into situ- Garten) (UN Photo/Mark Ban Ki-moon.
    [Show full text]
  • International Responses to Human Trafficking: the Ghanaian Experience
    Vol.7(7), pp. 62-68, November 2016 DOI: 10.5897/IJPDS2016.0282 Article Number: B02B4AF61520 International Journal of Peace and Development ISSN 2141–6621 Copyright © 2016 Studies Author(s) retain the copyright of this article http://www.academicjournals.org/IJPDS Full Length Research Paper International responses to human trafficking: The Ghanaian experience Gerald Dapaah Gyamfi University of Professional Studies, Accra, Ghana . Recieved 14 September, 2016; Accepted 26 October, 2016 Human trafficking in this era has been conceptualized as a global event that is likened to slavery because of the inhumane treatment that the victims go through. The scope and the criminal aspect of it demands police initiative to curb the menace. The current researcher used semi-structured qualitative interview, direct observation, and review of documents to gather data from Ghana Police Service and some anti-human trafficking institutions in Ghana to identify the nature, scope and responses to reduce or eradicate this menace that has detrimental effect on the people of Ghana, as a case study. Contemporarily, in terms of origin, destination and transit of people to engage in this criminal act, the menace put Ghana into Tier Two Watch-List classification in 2015 on the international level. Human trafficking in Ghana was characterized as violence, debt bondage, exploitation, deprivation of the freedom of the victims, and confiscation of travelling and other documents. The study revealed that the government of Ghana had put in only a minimal effort to curb the menace, and that the trafficking of people had created a security concern that the police must be apt to control.
    [Show full text]
  • Ghana Police Service
    Published by: Global Facilitation Network for Security Sector Reform University of Cranfield Shrivenham, UK ISSN 1740-2425 Volume 4 Number 2 - April 2006 An Overview Of The Ghana Police Service Emmanuel Kwesi Aning Acknowledgements In the preparation of this paper, several individuals and organisations have given support. Let me first thank Prosper Nii Nortey Addo, a Researcher at the African Security Dialogue and Research, who was instrumental in tracking down rare documents and setting up meetings with key officials. Probably, this work could not have been completed on time but for the consistent interest and support of two key Police officers whose personal and professional support disproves the generally held negative public view of the Police. Heartfelt thanks for DSP Paul Avuyi who took time off his busy schedule to talk and patiently ask questions. His personal interest in the work did not only end with his intellectual input, he carefully read the work and made suggestions. From the Records and Archival Department, thanks to Michael Teku for providing documents, the state of which definitely demonstrate the need for proper storage and care. There are several individuals who for several reasons want to remain unmentioned. They were instrumental in providing documents relevant to the study and sharing diverse perspectives on the Police, which has gone to enrich this short paper. The genesis of this short paper can be located within two totally separate but linked projects. One was the initiation of a study of public perceptions of the police by the Media Foundation for West Africa (MFWA) and a conference on Police and Policing in Ghana organised by the African Security Dialogue and Research (ASDR) in conjunction with MFWA and the Ministry of Interior.
    [Show full text]