DOCSLIB.ORG

Trump, with Putin, Attacks 2016 Intelligence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Trump, with Putin, Attacks 2016 Intelligence C M Y K Nxxx,2018-07-17,A,001,Bs-4C,E2 Late Edition Today, sunshine, few severe after- noon thunderstorms, high 87. To- night, clearing late, low 70. Tomor- row, mostly sunny, less humid, high 86. Weather map is on Page A16. VOL. CLXVII ... No. 58,026 © 2018 The New York Times Company NEW YORK, TUESDAY, JULY 17, 2018 $3.00 ‘I have great confidence in my intelligence people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today.’ PRESIDENT TRUMP, only moments after the Russian president conceded that he had favored Mr. Trump in the election. TRUMP, WITH PUTIN, ATTACKS 2016 INTELLIGENCE By JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS HELSINKI, Finland — President Trump stood next to President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia on Monday and pub- licly challenged the conclusion of his own intelligence agencies that Moscow inter- fered in the 2016 presidential election, wrapping up what he called a “deeply productive” summit meeting with an ex- traordinary show of trust for a leader ac- cused of attacking American democracy. In a remarkable news conference, Mr. Trump did not name a single action for which Mr. Putin should be held account- able. Instead, he saved his sharpest criti- cism for the United States and the special counsel investigation into the election in- terference, calling it a “ridiculous” probe and a “witch hunt” that has kept the two countries apart. Mr. Trump even questioned the deter- minations by his intelligence officials that Russia had meddled in the election. “They said they think it’s Russia,” Mr. Trump said. “I have President Putin; he just said it’s not Russia,” the president continued, only moments after Mr. Putin conceded that he had wanted Mr. Trump to win the election because of his prom- ises of warmer relations with Moscow. “I will say this: I don’t see any reason why it would be” Russia that was respon- sible for the election hacking, Mr. Trump added. “I have great confidence in my in- telligence people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today.” The 45-minute news conference of- fered the spectacle of the two presidents both pushing back on the notion of DOUG MILLS/THE NEW YORK TIMES Moscow’s election interference, with Mr. President Trump, with Vladimir V. Putin on Monday, saved his sharpest criticism for the United States and the special counsel inquiry into the 2016 election. Putin demanding evidence of something he said had never been proved, and Mr. Trump appearing to agree. When asked directly whether he be- Russian Made Secret Push Measured Condemnation Disdain for U.S. Institutions lieved Mr. Putin or his own intelligence agencies, Mr. Trump said there were To Sway Policy, Charges Say But No G.O.P. Plan to Act And Praise for an Adversary “two thoughts” on the matter: one from American officials like Dan Coats, his di- rector of national intelligence, asserting This article is by Matt Apuzzo, Katie Benner and Sharon This article is by Sheryl Gay Stolberg, Nicholas Fandos By MARK LANDLER Russia’s involvement; and one from Mr. LaFraniere. and Thomas Kaplan. Putin dismissing it. “I have confidence in WASHINGTON — President Trump, who glee- WASHINGTON — A Russian woman who tried to WASHINGTON — For nearly two years, Republi- both parties,” he said. fully defies the norms of presidential behavior, went He then changed the subject, demand- broker a secret meeting between Donald J. Trump and cans have watched uncomfortably, and often in silence, somewhere in Helsinki, Finland, on Monday where the Russian president, Vladimir V. Putin, during the as President Trump has swatted away accusations that ing to know why the F.B.I. never exam- none of his predecessors have ever gone: He ac- ined the hacked computer servers of the 2016 presidential campaign was charged Monday and Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential race, at- cepted the explanation of a hostile foreign leader accused of working with Americans to carry out a se- tacked his own intelligence agencies and flattered Democratic National Committee, and over the findings of his own intelligence asking about the fate of emails missing cret Russian effort to influence American politics. President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia. agencies. At the behest of a senior Russian government offi- On Monday, even for members of his own party, Mr. NEWS from the server of Hillary Clinton, his Mr. Trump’s declaration that he saw cial, the woman, Mariia Butina, made connections Trump apparently went too far. ANALYSIS campaign rival. “Where are Hillary Clin- no reason not to believe President through the National Rifle Association, religious orga- The president’s extraordinary news conference ton’s emails?” he said. Vladimir V. Putin when he said the nizations and the National Prayer Breakfast to try to with Mr. Putin in Helsinki, Finland, stunned Republi- His performance drew fierce protests Russians did not try to fix the 2016 election was steer the Republican Party toward more pro-Russia cans across the ideological spectrum and the party’s from Democrats and some Republicans, policies, court records show. Privately comparing her- political apparatus, leaving them struggling to respond extraordinary enough. But it was only one of several prompting John O. Brennan, a C.I.A. di- self to a Soviet Cold War propagandist, she worked to after the president undermined his national intelli- statements the likes of which no other president has rector under President Barack Obama, infiltrate American organizations and establish “back gence director, blamed both the United States and Rus- uttered while on foreign soil. to suggest that the remarks warranted channel” lines of communication with American poli- sia for poor relations between the two countries and He condemned the Justice Department’s investi- Mr. Trump’s impeachment. ticians. seemingly agreed to Mr. Putin’s suggestion that Robert gation of his campaign’s ties to Russia as a “disaster Continued on Page A6 “These lines could be used by the Russian Federa- S. Mueller III, the special counsel, cooperate with Rus- for our country.” He suggested that the F.B.I. deliber- tion to penetrate the U.S. national decision-making ap- sia. ately mishandled its investigation of Russia’s hacking paratus to advance the agenda of the Russian Federa- Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona, de- of the Democratic National Committee. And he la- A WIN Vladimir Putin achieved his goal: tion,” an F.B.I. agent wrote in court documents. clared, “No prior president has ever abased himself beled an F.B.I. agent who testified about that investi- affirmation of Russia’s status as a global The charges were filed under seal on Saturday, the more abjectly before a tyrant.” Newt Gingrich, the for- gation before Congress as a “disgrace to our country.” power. News Analysis. PAGE A7 day after 12 Russian intelligence officers were indicted mer House speaker and Trump adviser, declared the In the fiery, disruptive, rules-breaking arc of Mr. on a charge of hacking Democratic computers during news conference “the most serious mistake of his pres- Trump’s statecraft, his assertions during a news FACT CHECK Numerous claims from the 2016 campaign. Ms. Butina, 29, was arrested Sun- idency.” Mitt Romney, the 2012 Republican presidential conference with Mr. Putin marked a new milestone, President Trump’s news conference with Continued on Page A9 Continued on Page A9 Continued on Page A6 Russia’s leader are disputable. PAGE A8 Your Baby Is Coming. Help Is 100 Miles Away. that fewer than half of the coun- By JACK HEALY try’s rural counties still have a Obstetric Care Is Often hospital that offers obstetric care, KENNETT, Mo. — A few hours Dangerously Distant an absence that adds to the obsta- after the only hospital in town cles rural women face in getting shut its doors forever, Kela Aber- in Rural America health care. Specialists are in- nathy bolted awake at 4:30 a.m., creasingly clustered in bigger cit- screaming in pain. ies. Clinics that provide abortions, Oh God, she remembered think- long-term birth control and other ing, it’s the twins. be around the corner. Now, her reproductive services have been They were not due for another new doctor and hospital were forced to close in many smaller two months. But the contractions nearly 100 miles away. towns. seizing Ms. Abernathy’s lower Medical help is growing dan- “It’s scary,” said Katie Penn, back early that June morning told gerously distant for women in ru- who said she was rejected by eight her that her son and daughter ral America. At least 85 rural hos- doctors before finding an obstetri- were coming. Now. pitals — about 5 percent of the cian in Jonesboro, Ark., about an Ms. Abernathy, 21, staggered country’s total — have closed hour from Kennett. “You never out of bed and yelled for her since 2010, and obstetric care has know what can happen.” mother, Lynn, who had been lying faced even starker cutbacks as ru- When obstetric services leave awake on the living-room couch. ral hospitals calculate the hard They grabbed a few bags, scooped math of survival, weighing the town, a cascade of risks follows, up Ms. Abernathy’s 2-year-old son cost of providing 24/7 delivery according to experts at the Uni- and were soon hurtling across this services against dwindling birth- versity of Minnesota Rural Health poor patch of southeast Missouri rates, doctor and nursing short- Research Center who have stud- ANDREA MORALES FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES in their Pontiac Bonneville, racing ages and falling revenues.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The First Amendment, the Public-Private Distinction, and Nongovernmental Suppression of Wartime Political Debate Gregory P
    Working Paper Series Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Year 2004 The First Amendment, The Public-Private Distinction, and Nongovernmental Suppression of Wartime Political Debate Gregory P. Magarian Villanova University School of Law, [email protected] This paper is posted at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/wps/art6 THE FIRST AMENDMENT, THE PUBLIC -PRIVA TE DISTINCTION, AND NONGOVERNMENTAL SUPPRESSION OF WARTIME POLITICAL DEBATE 1 BY GREGORY P. MAGARIAN DRAFT 5-12-04 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 1 I. CONFRONTING NONGOVERNMENTAL CENSORSHIP OF POLITICAL DEBATE IN WARTIME .................. 5 A. The Value and Vulnerability of Wartime Political Debate ........................................................................... 5 1. The Historical Vulnerability of Wartime Political Debate to Nongovernmental Suppression ....................................................................... 5 2. The Public Rights Theory of Expressive Freedom and the Necessity of Robust Political Debate for Democratic Self -Government........................ 11 B. Nongovernmental Censorship of Political Speech During the “War on Terrorism” ............................................... 18 1. Misinformation and Suppression of Information by News Media ............................................ 19 2. Exclusions of Political Speakers from Privately Owned Public Spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Penal Reform, the Carceral State, and American Politics*
    Bring It On: The Future of Penal Reform, the Carceral State, and American Politics* Marie Gottschalk** Fifteen years ago, mass imprisonment was largely an invisible issue in the United States. Since then, criticism of the country’s extraordinary incarceration rate has become widespread across the political spectrum. The huge prison buildup of the past four decades has few ardent defenders at present. But reforms to reduce the number of people in jail and prison have been remarkably modest so far. Meanwhile, a tenacious carceral state has sprouted in the shadows of mass imprisonment and has been extending its reach far beyond the prison gate. It includes not only the country’s vast archipelago of jails and prisons, but also the far-reaching and growing range of penal punishments and controls that lie in the never-never land between the prison gate and full citizenship. As it sunders families and communities, and radically reworks conceptions of democracy, rights, and citizenship, the carceral state poses a formidable political and social challenge. The reach of the carceral state today is truly breathtaking. It extends well beyond the estimated 2.2 million people sitting in jail or prison today in the United States.1 It encompasses the more than 8 million people—or 1 in 23 adults―who are under some form of state control: including jail, prison, probation, parole, community sanctions, drug courts, immigrant detention, and other forms of government supervision.2 It also includes the millions of people who are booked into jail each year— nearly twelve million—and the estimated 7.5 percent of all adults who are felons or ex-felons.3 * This article is based on a revised and updated version of the concluding chapter of Marie Gottschalk, Caught: The Prison State and the Lockdown of American Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Rhetorical Constructions in Donald Trump's 2017 Inaugural Address
    Uniting Trump’s America: Rhetorical constructions in Donald Trump’s 2017 inaugural address by Joseph E. Kauffman B.A., Indiana University - Southeast, 2018 A THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS Department of Communication Studies College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2021 Approved by: Major Professor Colene Lind, Ph.D. Copyright © Joseph E. Kauffman 2021. Abstract The diversity present within the United States presents a crucial question for its populace: what does it mean to be an American? No one is better positioned to answer this query than the president, who does so through rhetorical constructions of national identity. A functional polity requires some measure of common identity and constructing it is an important task for the country’s only nationally elected and most visible representative. Yet scholars well identify Trump and his rhetoric as dangerously divisive. This paradox forces one to wonder: how did Trump attempt the task of rhetorically constructing an American national identity? The thesis that follows attends to this question with an analysis of Trump’s attempts to rhetorically construct the American people via his inaugural address. In addition to the how of Trump’s attempts at construction, I also consider who these attempts identify as true Americans and the effects that these attempts may induce in the American people. I first place this question within the context of previous research on presidential rhetoric and national identity. Scholars identify the tasks of generating, re-articulating, and maintaining national identity as key features of the modern U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 337 Truth and Consequences: Mitt Romney, Proposition 8
    File: GEDICKS.Truth and Consequences.FINAL.docCreated on: 2/10/2010 11:30:00 AM Last Printed: 2/10/2010 12:36:00 PM ESSAY TRUTH AND CONSEQUENCES: MITT ROMNEY, PROPOSITION 8, AND PUBLIC REASON Frederick Mark Gedicks* ABSTRACT Although formal religious tests for federal office are constitutionally prohibited, they have long been facts of political life in presidential elec- tions. John Kennedy remains the only non-Protestant ever elected Presi- dent, and no major party has ever nominated a non-Christian. Against this electoral history, it was predictable that mainstream Christian commentators would legitimate attacks on Mitt Romney’s Mor- monism during the Republican presidential primaries as a “false” religion. The Mormon Church itself, however, periodically intervenes in initiative and ratification campaigns to defend “true” or “divine” principles that it believes ought to be enacted into law. How unfair is it to label a religion “false” in an electoral campaign, if the religion itself regularly partici- pates in such campaigns on the basis of truth and falsity? This Essay examines the deployment of religious truth-claims in elec- toral politics through the lenses of Governor Romney’s unsuccessful cam- paign for the Republican nomination and the LDS Church’s participation in the successful Proposition 8 campaign to ban same-sex marriage in Cal- ifornia. I argue that in contemporary electoral politics, attacks on the truth * Guy Anderson Chair & Professor of Law, Brigham Young University Law School; ge- [email protected]. I presented earlier versions of this Essay during 2008 and 2009 at a conference on religion, citizenship, and multiculturalism at Harvard Law School, at a meeting of the Theory Group of the Brigham Young University Psychology Department, and at faculty colloquia at the law schools of Brigham Young University, the University of Cincinnati, the University of Denver, and DePaul Uni- versity.
    [Show full text]
  • Bill Clinton Bibliography - 2002 Thru 2020*
    Bill Clinton Bibliography - 2002 thru 2020* Books African American Journalists Rugged Waters: Black Journalists Swim the Mainstream by Wayne Dawkins PN4882.5 .D38 2003 African American Women Cotton Field of Dreams: A Memoir by Janis Kearney F415.3.K43 K43 2004 For Colored Girls Who Have Considered Politics by Donna Brazile E185.96 .B829 2018 African Americans--Biography Step by Step: A Memoir of Hope, Friendship, Perseverance, and Living the American Dream by Bertie Bowman E185.97 .B78 A3 2008 African Americans--Civil Rights Brown Versus Board of Education: Caste, Culture, and the Constitution KF4155 .B758 2003 A Matter of Justice: Eisenhower and the Beginning of the Civil Rights Revolution by David Nichols E836 .N53 2007 Winning While Losing: Civil Rights, the Conservative Movement, and the Presidency From Nixon to Obama edited by Kenneth Osgood and Derrick White E185.615 .W547 2013 African Americans--Politics and Government Bill Clinton and Black America by DeWayne Wickham E886.2 .W53 2002 Conversations: William Jefferson Clinton from Hope to Harlem by Janis Kearney E886.2 .K43 2006 African Americans--Social Conditions The Mark of Criminality: Rhetoric, Race, and Gangsta Rap in the War-on-crime Era * This is a non-annotated continuation of Allan Metz’s, Bill Clinton: A Bibliography. 1 by Bryan McCann ML3531 .M3 2019 Air Force One (Presidential Aircraft) Air Force One: The Aircraft that Shaped the Modern Presidency by Von Hardesty TL723 .H37 2003 Air Force One: A History of the Presidents and Their Planes by Kenneth Walsh TL723 .W35
    [Show full text]
  • Mr. Trump's Contribution to Women's Human Rights Barbara Stark Maurice A
    Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship 2018 Mr. Trump's Contribution To Women's Human Rights Barbara Stark Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Barbara Stark, Mr. Trump's Contribution To Women's Human Rights, 24 318 (2018) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship/1155 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MR. TRUMP’S CONTRIBUTION TO WOMEN’S HUMAN RIGHTS Barbara Stark I. INTRODUCTION:THE DAY AFTER ................................................................. 317 II. CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS:THE MARCH................................................. 319 A. Legal Grounds ......................................................................................... 320 B. Civil and Political Rights ......................................................................... 321 1. Organizing ............................................................................................. 321 2. The November 2017 Elections..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy, Civil Society, Social Movements, Elections Articles
    Democracy, Civil Society, Social Movements, Elections Articles 1. Social Movements, Mobilizations, and Politics How Do We Change America? By Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor ​ ​ New Yorker America, This Is Your Chance By Michelle Alexander New York Times I Know Voting Feels Inadequate Right Now By Stacey Abrams New York Times The Left Is Remaking the World By Amma Akbar New York Times When Does Activism Become Powerful? By Hahrie Han The New York Times 2. Civic Infrastructure, Civic Space, Civic Practice Where is civil society when you need it? By Michael Edwards openDemocracy Equity in the Commons By Lynn Ross Medium How Communities Lost Their Soul By Nicholas Boys Smith UnHerd From Ancient Athens to the Town Hall: Can a New Wave of Deliberative Democracy Save the World? By Paul Rosenberg Salon Democracy is a Habit: Practice It By Melvin Rogers Boston Review Americans Aren’t Practicing Democracy Anymore By Yoni Appelabaum Atlantic Normcore By Jedidiah Britton-Purdy Dissent Voting Alone By Marc Tracy New York Times Want to Build Democracy? Then Build Libraries By NILANJANA ROY ​ ​ Financial Times To Restore Civil Society, Start with the Library Erik Klinenberg NY Times Bridging Divides: Reimagining the Public Library shamichael hallman Medium The Big Picture: Defending Open Cities By Saskia Sassen Public Books Civility in Politics Is Harder Than You Think By Robert B. Talisse The Conversation Is Forgiveness the Basis of a Healthy Democracy? by RAMIN JAHANBEGLOO Zocalo Public Square Building Democratic Infrastructure By Hollie Russon Gilman, K. Sabeel Rahman, & Elena Souris Stanford Social Innovation Review 3. Creative Engagement with Politics and the Public You Can’t Count if You’re Not Counted: Exhibition Explores Census in NYC The Mellon Foundation The Art of Voting Macalester College 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Antidemocratic Effects of the Internet & Social Media: a Survey
    ANTIDEMOCRATIC EFFECTS OF THE INTERNET & SOCIAL MEDIA: A SURVEY Taisa Goodnature Professor Nathaniel A. Persily LAW 805C: Policy Practicum Spring Quarter 2016-2017 July 10, 2017 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 I. Problems ................................................................................................................... 1 A. Echo Chambers ................................................................................................... 1 B. Fake News ........................................................................................................... 5 C. Computational Propaganda (Bots) ..................................................................... 13 D. Hate Speech....................................................................................................... 18 E. Foreign Intervention in Domestic Campaigns .................................................... 25 II. Platforms ................................................................................................................. 30 A. Google/YouTube ............................................................................................... 30 B. Facebook ........................................................................................................... 33 C. Twitter............................................................................................................... 37 Conclusion ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Eyes That Blind Us: the Overlooked Phenomenon of Trafficking Into the Agricultural Sector
    The Eyes that Blind Us: The Overlooked Phenomenon of Trafficking into the Agricultural Sector SHELLEY CAVALIERI I. THE AMERICAN STATUTORY REGIME IS NEUTRAL AS TO THE LABOR SECTOR INTO WHICH TRAFFICKING OCCURS ..................................... 503 II. AMERICAN DISCOURSE ON TRAFFICKING, INCLUDING PROSECUTIONS, OVEREMPHASIZES TRAFFICKING INTO SEX WORK AND OVERLOOKS TRAFFICKING INTO OTHER LABOR SECTORS ..................................... 505 III. EXPLAINING THE DISPROPORTIONATE LEGAL RESPONSE TO SEX TRAFFICKING CASES AS COMPARED TO LABOR TRAFFICKING CASES ................................................................................................. 510 IV. TRAFFICKING INTO AGRICULTURE: A CASE STUDY IN HIDDEN FORMS OF TRAFFICKING ................................................................................. 513 V. PRACTICAL INTERVENTIONS CAN SHIFT ATTENTION AND RESOURCES TOWARD TRAFFICKING INTO THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR .............. 516 VI. CONCLUSION ...................................................................................... 518 When most people in the United States think of human trafficking, they almost inevitably envision a situation of trafficking for sexual purposes because that is the form of trafficking that has come to occupy the popular imagination. If one has only a passing familiarity with human trafficking, it is due to evening news specials or perhaps a magazine feature of a girl or young woman who was trafficked into commercial sex work. A casual re- view of the legal scholarship related to trafficking
    [Show full text]
  • Antoni Muntadas and Marshall Reese Present Political Advertisement
    FILM Antoni Muntadas and Marshall NEW YORK Reese present Political Fri, November 04, 2016 Advertisement 7:00 pm – 9:30 pm Venue SVA Theatre, 333 W 23rd St, New York, NY 10011 View map Admission Free More information SVA Theatre Credits Political Advertisement IX is sponsored by the following School of Visual Arts Departments: MFA Art Practice Department, MFA Computer Art Department, MFA Fine Arts “Political Advertisement” is a personal vision of how politics Department, MFA Social Documentary Department, and BFA and politicians are presented through the medium of TV. Fine Arts Department. It is being co- presented by Electronic Arts Intermix For 32 years, artists Muntadas and Reese have been compiling a history (EAI), a New York-based non-profit of presidential campaign spots following the evolution of political media arts resource and distribution advertising from its beginnings in 1952 to the present. Political service that is celebrating its 45th Advertisement is a personal vision of how politics and politicians are anniversary. presented through the medium of TV. For the past nine general elections, the artists premiere the latest version of the tape in a public presentation, followed by a discussion about the impact of campaign advertising. This year author Michelle Goldberg, senior contributing writer to Slate.com, will moderate a discussion on the role of advertising in the 2016 election. Her work has also appeared in The New Yorker, Rolling Stone, The Nation, The Guardian (UK) and The New Republic. Occurring during the final weekend of this year’s campaign, this event will offer a timely and important outlet for discussion as many prepare to cast their ballots.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Political Correctness an Enemy of Free Speech Or Does It Help Create a More Just Society?
    TWENTY-SECOND SEMI-ANNUAL MUNK DEBATE ANNOUNCED IS POLITICAL CORRECTNESS AN ENEMY OF FREE SPEECH OR DOES IT HELP CREATE A MORE JUST SOCIETY? Michael Eric Dyson, Michelle Goldberg, Stephen Fry, and Jordan Peterson convene in Toronto to debate political correctness. March 5, 2018 – Toronto, Canada The Munk Debates announced today the resolution for the 22nd semi-annual event, to be held in Toronto on Friday, May 18, 2018. The Spring 2018 Munk Debate will move the motion: Be it resolved, what you call political correctness, I call progress. For some, the argument is clear. Political correctness is stifling the free and open debate that fuels our democracy. It is also needlessly dividing one group from another and promoting social conflict. Others insist that creating public spaces and norms that give voice to previously marginalised groups broadens the scope of free speech. The drive toward inclusion over exclusion is essential to creating healthy, diverse polities in an era of rapid social change. Arguing for the resolution will be author, broadcaster and Georgetown University professor Michael Eric Dyson. Dyson hosts NPR’s “The Michael Eric Dyson Show,” is a contributing editor for the New Republic and has written more than a dozen books on race, culture and politics in the United States. He will be joined by Michelle Goldberg, a journalist, New York Times columnist and bestselling author. Goldberg is a frequent political commentator on MSNBC and has had her writing featured in The New Yorker, Newsweek, The Nation, the New Republic, The Guardian, and is the author of three books.
    [Show full text]
  • Les États-Unis Divisés. La Démocrafi
    Septembre 2019 LES ÉTATS-UNIS DIVISÉS LA DÉMOCRATIE AMÉRICAINE À L’ÉPREUVE DE LA PRÉSIDENCE TRUMP Frédérick Gagnon, Frédéric Heurtebize et Maud Quessard (dir.) ÉTUDE – n o 68 LES ÉTATS-UNIS DIVISÉS LA DÉMOCRATIE AMÉRICAINE À L’ÉPREUVE DE LA PRÉSIDENCE TRUMP Frédérick Gagnon, Frédéric Heurtebize et Maud Quessard (dir.) Pour citer cette étude Frédérick Gagnon, Frédéric Heurtebize et Maud Quessard (dir.), Les États- Unis divisés : la démocratie américaine à l’épreuve de la présidence Trump, Étude n° 68, IRSEM, septembre 2019. Dépôt légal ISSN : 2268-3194 ISBN : 978-2-11-152698-3 DERNIÈRES ÉTUDES DE L’IRSEM 67. Le Financement chinois dans le secteur des transports en Afrique : un risque maîtrisé Juliette GENEVAZ et Denis TULL 66. L’Expérience militaire dans les médias (2008-2018). Une diversification des formes de récits Bénédicte CHÉRON 65. MCO 4.0. Le potentiel des technologies de l’industrie 4.0 appliquées au maintien en condition opérationnelle (MCO) des équipements de défense Josselin DROFF, ICA Benoît RADEMACHER 64. Impact des nouveaux modèles économiques industriels sur les équipements des armées Dr Antoine PIETRI, ICA Benoît RADEMACHER 63. Le Rôle des armées dans la fonction « intégration » de l’État Barbara JANKOWSKI 62. Le Gazoduc Nord Stream 2. Enjeux politiques et stratégiques Céline MARANGÉ, Angélique PALLE et Sami RAMDANI 61. Améliorer la résilience psychologique des combattants et de leurs familles. Pour une prévention permettant de limiter l’impact psychologique d’un traumatisme et/ou de faciliter le rétablissement LCL Arnaud PLANIOL 60. L’Activité de renseignement des groupes jihadistes COL Olivier PASSOT 59. France and Poland Facing the Evolution of the Security Environment Barbara JANKOWSKI and Amélie ZIMA (eds.) ÉQUIPE PRÉSENTATION DE L’IRSEM Directeur Créé en 2009, l’Institut de recherche stratégique de l’École militaire Jean-Baptiste JEANGÈNE VILMER (IRSEM) est un organisme extérieur de la Direction générale des relations internationales et de la stratégie (DGRIS) du ministère des Directeur scientifique Armées.
    [Show full text]