DOCSLIB.ORG

Recovery Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Recovery Plan Recovery Plan N As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department ofthe Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering the wisestuse ofouriandandwater resources, protectingourfish and wiWlife, preservingthe environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historicalplaces, and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses ourenergyandmineral resourcesandworkstoassure that their development is in the bestinterestsofallourpeople. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities andfor people who live in island Territories under U.S. administration. K Desert Tortoise (Mojave Population) Recovery Plan Tune 1994 Prepared for Regions 1, 2, and 6 of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region I - Lead Region, Portland, Oregon. DESERT TORTOISE (MOJAVE POPULATION) RECOVERY PLAN Prepared by the Desert Tortoise Recovery Team For Regions 1, 2, and 6 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 1 - Lead Region, Portland, Oregon Approved ~ Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Concurred Chairman, Desert Tortoise Management Oversight Group Date Approved June 28. 1994 DISCLAIMER PAGE Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions which are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance ofrecovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and otherconstraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views, official positions, orapproval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan fonnulation, otherthan the Fish and WildlifeService, and gnjy after they have been signed by the Regional Director orDirector as ~ppr.Q~d. Approvedrecovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in special status, and the completion ofrecovery tasks. LiTERATURE CiTATION SHOULD READ AS FOLLOWS Fish and Wildlife Service. 1994. Desert tortoise (Mojave population) Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. 73 pages plus appendices. Additional copies may be purchased from Fish and Wildlife Reference Service 5430 GrosvenorLane, Suite 110 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Telephone: (301)492 6403 or l-(800) 582 3421 The fees forplans vary depending on the number ofpages. : RECOVERY TEAM This Recovery Plan was preparedby the Desert Tortoise Recovery Team: Dr. PeterF. Brussard, Team Leader University of Nevada, Reno Reno, Nevada Dr. Kristin H. Berry National Biological Survey Riverside, California Dr. Michael E. Gilpin University ofCalifornia, La Jolla LaJolla, California Dr. Elliott R. Jacobson University of Florida Gainesville, Florida Dr. David J. Morafica California State University, Dominguez Hills Carson, California Dr. Cecil R. Schwalbe National Biological Survey Tucson, Arizona Dr. C. Richard Tracy Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Dr. Frank C. Vasek Valley Center, California Acknowledgements Chris Mullen of the University of Nevada, Reno, provided invaluable help during all phases of the production of this recovery plan. The University of Nevada, Reno, Biology Department and Agricultural experiment station provided facilities and funding. Numerous people and organizations were instrumental in providing significant information and assistance. These include: Dr. William R. Blischke, Eddy Trevino, and Michelle Joyner-Griffith, California State University, Dominguez Hills; Dr. Jerry Boggs, U.S. Naval Weapons Center, China Lake; Capt. Elizabeth Buckrucker, U.S. Army National Training Center, Fort Irwin; Betty L. Burge, The Tortoise Group; Dr. William Boarman, Dr. Harold Avery, Dr. Jeffrey Lovich, James Carroll, Richard Franklin, Clara Stapp, and Anthony Chavez, BLM, California Desert District; Chris Catapano, Chris Tracy, Kathy Dean-Bradley, Robert Espinoza, ScottHillard, Kevin Castle, and Pamela Budhovich, Colorado State University; Deborah Clark, California Department ofFish and Game, Barstow; Thomas 0. Clark, BLM, Barstow Resource Area; Mike Coffeen, U.S. Navy, San Diego; George Cropper and Timothy Duck, BLM, Arizona Strip District; Ted Cordery, BLM, Arizona State Office; Desert Tortoise Preserve Committee; Leslie DeFalco, Todd Esque, Scott Belfit, and John Payne, BLM, Cedar City District; Sid Slone, Phil Medica, and Doug Duncan, BLM, Las Vegas District; Dr. Jerry Freilich,Joshua Tree National Monument; Brian Henen and Chuck Peterson, University ofCalifornia, Los Angeles; Jack Kawashima (deceased) and Dr. John Palmer, Southern California Edison; Dr. Anthony J. Krzysik, U.S. Army National Training Center, Fort Irwin; JeffHowland, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix; Brad Hardenbrook, Nevada Department ofWildlife, Las Vegas; Ed LaRue, Tierra Madre Consultants; Ed Lorentzen, BLM, California State Office; Dr. Claudia Luke, Biosystems Analysis; Dr. Ron Marlow, Silver State Environmental Research and Consulting; Tom Olson, Dames and Moore; Randy Radant, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources; Peter Woodman, Kiva Biological Consulting; Dr. Linda Zimmerman, Drexel University; Sherry Barrett, Pete Tuttle, and David Harlow, FWS, Reno; Jim Rorabaugh, FWS, Phoenix; Judy Hohman and Ray Bransfield, FWS, Ventura; Jay Slack, FWS, Washington D.C.; RobertBenton and Marilet Zablan, FWS, Salt Lake City; Steve Chambers, FWS, Albuquerque; and Interagency Writing Consultants. Desert Tortoise (Mojave Population) Recovery Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Current Status: The range ofthe desert tortoise, Gopherus agassizii, includes the Mojave and Sonoran deserts in southern California, southern Nevada, Arizona, the southwestern tip of Utah, and Sonora and northern Sinaloa, Mexico. The Mojave population of the desert tortoise (an administrative designation for animals living north and west ofthe Colorado River) was listed as threatened on April 2, 1990. Critical habitat for the Mojave population was designated on February 8, 1994. Habitat Requirements and Limiting Factors: The Mojave population of the desert tortoise occurs primarily on flats and bajadas characterized by scattered shrubs and abundant inter-space forgrowth ofherbaceous plants, with soils ranging from sand to sandy-gravel. Desert tortoises are also found on rocky terrain and slopes, and there is significant geographic variation in the way desert tortoises use available resources. The Mojave population was listed because desert tortoise numbers are declining precipitously in many areas. These declines are mainly attributed to direct and indirecthuman-caused mortality coupled with the inadequacy ofexisting regulatory mechanisms to protect desert tortoises and their habitat. Impacts such as the destruction, degradation, and fragmentation ofdesert tortoise habitat result from urbanization, agricultural development, livestock grazing, mining, and roads. Human “predation” is also a major factor in the decline ofdesert tortoise populations. Predation is used here in its broadest sense, meaning the taking ofdesert tortoises out oftheir populations either by death (accidental or intentional) orremoval from native habitat. An upper respiratory tract disease (URTD) is an additional major cause ofdesert tortoise mortality and population decline, particularly in the western Mojave Desert. Recovery Objective: Delisting through recovery. Delisting Criteria: Genetics, morphology, behavior, ecology, and habitat use define six distinct population segments orrecovery units’ within the range of the Mojave population: northern Colorado, eastern Colorado, upper Virgin River, eastern Mojave, northeastern Mojave, and western Mojave. The 1 For the purpose of this document, the following definitions should be used: Recovery unit - a geographic area harboringan evolutionarily distinct population of the deserttortoise (Mojavepopulation); Desert Wildlife Management Area (DWMA) - adminisu~ative area within the recovery unit which is managed such that reserve-level protection is afforded deserttortoise populations while maintaining and protecting other sensitive species and ecosystem functions (e.g., watersheds). i Desert Tortoise (MojavePopulation) Recovery Plan population within a recovery unit may be considered fordelisting when the following criteria are met (1) As determined by a scientifically credible monitoring plan, the population within a recovery unitmust exhibit a statistically significant upward trend or remain stationary for at least 25 years (one desert tortoise generation); (2) enough habitat must be protected within a recovery unit, or the habitat and desert tortoise populations must be managed intensively enough to ensure long-term viability; (3) provisions must be made forpopulation management within eachrecovery unit so that discrete population growth rates (lambdas) are maintained at or above 1.0. (4) regulatory mechanisms orland management commitments must be implemented that provide for long-term protection of desert tortoises and their habitat; and (5) the population in the recovery unit is unlikely to need protection under the Endangered Species Act in the foreseeable future. Actions Needed: This Recovery Plan describes a strategy for recovery and deisting. Keyto this strategy is - the establishment of at least one Desert WildlifeManagement Area - implementation ofreserve level protection within each DWMA
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Minutes of the January 25, 2010, Meeting of the Board of Regents
    MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 25, 2010, MEETING OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS ATTENDANCE This scheduled meeting of the Board of Regents was held on Monday, January 25, 2010, in the Regents’ Room of the Smithsonian Institution Castle. The meeting included morning, afternoon, and executive sessions. Board Chair Patricia Q. Stonesifer called the meeting to order at 8:31 a.m. Also present were: The Chief Justice 1 Sam Johnson 4 John W. McCarter Jr. Christopher J. Dodd Shirley Ann Jackson David M. Rubenstein France Córdova 2 Robert P. Kogod Roger W. Sant Phillip Frost 3 Doris Matsui Alan G. Spoon 1 Paul Neely, Smithsonian National Board Chair David Silfen, Regents’ Investment Committee Chair 2 Vice President Joseph R. Biden, Senators Thad Cochran and Patrick J. Leahy, and Representative Xavier Becerra were unable to attend the meeting. Also present were: G. Wayne Clough, Secretary John Yahner, Speechwriter to the Secretary Patricia L. Bartlett, Chief of Staff to the Jeffrey P. Minear, Counselor to the Chief Justice Secretary T.A. Hawks, Assistant to Senator Cochran Amy Chen, Chief Investment Officer Colin McGinnis, Assistant to Senator Dodd Virginia B. Clark, Director of External Affairs Kevin McDonald, Assistant to Senator Leahy Barbara Feininger, Senior Writer‐Editor for the Melody Gonzales, Assistant to Congressman Office of the Regents Becerra Grace L. Jaeger, Program Officer for the Office David Heil, Assistant to Congressman Johnson of the Regents Julie Eddy, Assistant to Congresswoman Matsui Richard Kurin, Under Secretary for History, Francisco Dallmeier, Head of the National Art, and Culture Zoological Park’s Center for Conservation John K.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts: Studying Old Master Paintings
    BOOK OF ABSTRACTS STUDYING OLD MASTER PAINTINGS ­ TECHNOLOGY AND PRACTICE THE NATIONAL GALLERY TECHNICAL BULLETIN 30TH ANNIVERSARY CONFERENCE 16­18 September 2009, Sainsbury Wing Theatre, National Gallery, London Supported by The Elizabeth Cayzer Charitable Trust STUDYING OLD MASTER PAINTINGS ­ TECHNOLOGY AND PRACTICE THE NATIONAL GALLERY TECHNICAL BULLETIN 30TH ANNIVERSARY CONFERENCE BOOK OF ABSTRACTS 16­18 September 2009 Sainsbury Wing Theatre, National Gallery, London The Proceedings of this Conference will be published by Archetype Publications, London in 2010 Contents Presentations Page Presentations (cont’d) Page The Paliotto by Guido da Siena from the Pinacoteca Nazionale of Siena 3 The rediscovery of sublimated arsenic sulphide pigments in painting 25 Marco Ciatti, Roberto Bellucci, Cecilia Frosinini, Linda Lucarelli, Luciano Sostegni, and polychromy: Applications of Raman microspectroscopy Camilla Fracassi, Carlo Lalli Günter Grundmann, Natalia Ivleva, Mark Richter, Heike Stege, Christoph Haisch Painting on parchment and panels: An exploration of Pacino di 5 The use of blue and green verditer in green colours in seventeenth­century 27 Bonaguida’s technique Netherlandish painting practice Carole Namowicz, Catherine M. Schmidt, Christine Sciacca, Yvonne Szafran, Annelies van Loon, Lidwein Speleers Karen Trentelman, Nancy Turner Alterations in paintings: From non­invasive in­situ assessment to 29 Technical similarities between mural painting and panel painting in 7 laboratory research the works of Giovanni da Milano: The Rinuccini
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Cultural Resources of the Western Mojave Desert
    BLM LIBRARY BURE/ IT 88014080 An Overview of the Cultural Resources of the Western Mojave Desert by E . G ary Stic kel and - L ois J . W einm an Ro berts with sections by Rainer Beig ei and Pare Hopa cultural resources publications anthropology— history Cover design represents a petroglyph element from Inscription Canyon, San Bernardino County, California. : AN OVERVIEW OF THE CULTURAL RESOURCES OF THE WESTERN TOJAVE DESERT by Gary Stickel and Lois J. Weinman- Roberts Environmental Research Archaeologists: A Scientific Consortium Los Angeles with sections by Rainer Berger and Pare Hopa BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT LIBRARY Denver, Colorado 88014680 Prepared for the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT California Desert Planning Program 3610 Central Avenue, Suite 402 Riverside, California 92506 Contract No. YA-512-CT8-106 ERIC W. RITTER GENERAL EDITOR Bureau of Land RIVERSIDE, CA Management Library 1980 Bldg. 50, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 *•' FOREWORD Culture resource overviews such as this bring together much of the available information on prehistoric and historic peoples and present- day Native American groups along with their associated environments. The purpose behind these studies is to provide background information for the management of and research into these prehistoric, historic, and contemporary resources. This overview is one of seven covering the southern California deserts undertaken as part of a comprehensive planning effort by the Bureau of Land Management for these deserts. Overviews aid in the day-to-day management of cultural resources and in the completion of environmental analyses and research projects. Its general value to the public in the fields of education and recreation-interpretation must also be stressed.
    [Show full text]
  • March 21–25, 2016
    FORTY-SEVENTH LUNAR AND PLANETARY SCIENCE CONFERENCE PROGRAM OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS MARCH 21–25, 2016 The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel and Convention Center The Woodlands, Texas INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT Universities Space Research Association Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute Eileen Stansbery, NASA Johnson Space Center PROGRAM COMMITTEE CHAIRS David Draper, NASA Johnson Space Center Walter Kiefer, Lunar and Planetary Institute PROGRAM COMMITTEE P. Doug Archer, NASA Johnson Space Center Nicolas LeCorvec, Lunar and Planetary Institute Katherine Bermingham, University of Maryland Yo Matsubara, Smithsonian Institute Janice Bishop, SETI and NASA Ames Research Center Francis McCubbin, NASA Johnson Space Center Jeremy Boyce, University of California, Los Angeles Andrew Needham, Carnegie Institution of Washington Lisa Danielson, NASA Johnson Space Center Lan-Anh Nguyen, NASA Johnson Space Center Deepak Dhingra, University of Idaho Paul Niles, NASA Johnson Space Center Stephen Elardo, Carnegie Institution of Washington Dorothy Oehler, NASA Johnson Space Center Marc Fries, NASA Johnson Space Center D. Alex Patthoff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Cyrena Goodrich, Lunar and Planetary Institute Elizabeth Rampe, Aerodyne Industries, Jacobs JETS at John Gruener, NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center Justin Hagerty, U.S. Geological Survey Carol Raymond, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Lindsay Hays, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Paul Schenk,
    [Show full text]
  • Art-Related Archival Materials in the Chicago Area
    ART-RELATED ARCHIVAL MATERIALS IN THE CHICAGO AREA Betty Blum Archives of American Art American Art-Portrait Gallery Building Smithsonian Institution 8th and G Streets, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20560 1991 TRUSTEES Chairman Emeritus Richard A. Manoogian Mrs. Otto L. Spaeth Mrs. Meyer P. Potamkin Mrs. Richard Roob President Mrs. John N. Rosekrans, Jr. Richard J. Schwartz Alan E. Schwartz A. Alfred Taubman Vice-Presidents John Wilmerding Mrs. Keith S. Wellin R. Frederick Woolworth Mrs. Robert F. Shapiro Max N. Berry HONORARY TRUSTEES Dr. Irving R. Burton Treasurer Howard W. Lipman Mrs. Abbott K. Schlain Russell Lynes Mrs. William L. Richards Secretary to the Board Mrs. Dana M. Raymond FOUNDING TRUSTEES Lawrence A. Fleischman honorary Officers Edgar P. Richardson (deceased) Mrs. Francis de Marneffe Mrs. Edsel B. Ford (deceased) Miss Julienne M. Michel EX-OFFICIO TRUSTEES Members Robert McCormick Adams Tom L. Freudenheim Charles Blitzer Marc J. Pachter Eli Broad Gerald E. Buck ARCHIVES STAFF Ms. Gabriella de Ferrari Gilbert S. Edelson Richard J. Wattenmaker, Director Mrs. Ahmet M. Ertegun Susan Hamilton, Deputy Director Mrs. Arthur A. Feder James B. Byers, Assistant Director for Miles Q. Fiterman Archival Programs Mrs. Daniel Fraad Elizabeth S. Kirwin, Southeast Regional Mrs. Eugenio Garza Laguera Collector Hugh Halff, Jr. Arthur J. Breton, Curator of Manuscripts John K. Howat Judith E. Throm, Reference Archivist Dr. Helen Jessup Robert F. Brown, New England Regional Mrs. Dwight M. Kendall Center Gilbert H. Kinney Judith A. Gustafson, Midwest
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan Proposed Land
    DRECP Proposed LUPA and Final EIS CHAPTER III.8. CULTURAL RESOURCES III.8 CULTURAL RESOURCES This chapter presents the Affected Environment for the Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA) Decision Area and the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP) area for cultural resources. These areas overlap, and in the following programmatic discussion are referred to broadly as the “California Desert Region.” More than 32,000 cultural resources are known in the DRECP area in every existing environmental context ⎼ from mountain crests to dry lake beds ⎼ and include both surface and subsurface deposits. Cultural resources are categorized as buildings, sites, structures, objects, and districts (including cultural landscapes and Traditional Cultural Properties) under the federal National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). Historic properties are cultural resources included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), maintained by the Secretary of the Interior (36 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 60.4). See Section III.8.1.1 for more information on federal regulations and historic properties. This chapter discusses three types of cultural resources classified by their origins: prehistoric, ethnographic, and historic. Prehistoric cultural resources are associated with the human occupation of California prior to prolonged European contact. These resources may include sites and deposits, structures, artifacts, rock art, trails, and other traces of Native American human behavior. In California, the prehistoric period began over 12,000 years ago and extended through the eighteenth century until 1769, when the first Europeans settled in California. Ethnographic resources represent the heritage of a particular ethnic or cultural group, such as Native Americans or African, European, Latino, or Asian immigrants.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.5 Cultural Resources
    4.5 – Cultural Resources 4.5 Cultural Resources This section identifies cultural and paleontological resources along the IC Project Alignment, identifies applicable significance thresholds, assesses the IC Project’s impacts to these resources and their significance, and recommends measures to avoid or substantially reduce any effects found to be potentially significant. Cultural resources are defined as any object or specific location of past human activity, occupation, or use that is identifiable through historical documentation, inventory, or oral evidence. Cultural resources can be separated into three categories: archaeological, building/structural, and traditional resources. Archaeological resources include prehistoric and historic remains of human activity. Prehistoric resources can be composed of lithic scatters, ceramic scatters, quarries, habitation sites, temporary camps/rock rings, ceremonial sites, and trails. Historic-era resources are typically those that are 50 years or older. Historic archaeological resources can consist of structural remains (e.g., concrete foundations), historic objects (e.g., bottles and cans), features (e.g., refuse deposits or scatters), and sites (e.g., resources that contain one or more of the aforementioned categories). Built environment resources range from historic buildings to canals, historic roads and trails, bridges, ditches, cemeteries, and electrical infrastructure, such as transmission lines, substations, and generating facilities. A traditional cultural resource is a resource associated with the cultural practices, traditions, beliefs, lifeways, arts, crafts, or social institutions of a living community. They are rooted in a traditional community’s history and are important in maintaining the continuing cultural identity of the community. See Section 4.18, Tribal Cultural Resources, for a discussion on cultural resources of potential importance to California Native American tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Water - Surface Water Interactions in the Lower Virgin River Area, Arizona and Nevada
    UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-1995 Ground water - surface water interactions in the lower Virgin River area, Arizona and Nevada Lynn Metcalf University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation Metcalf, Lynn, "Ground water - surface water interactions in the lower Virgin River area, Arizona and Nevada" (1995). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 502. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/z90f-mtsv This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America
    Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America There are approximately 101,135sexual abuse claims filed. Of those claims, the Tort Claimants’ Committee estimates that there are approximately 83,807 unique claims if the amended and superseded and multiple claims filed on account of the same survivor are removed. The summary of sexual abuse claims below uses the set of 83,807 of claim for purposes of claims summary below.1 The Tort Claimants’ Committee has broken down the sexual abuse claims in various categories for the purpose of disclosing where and when the sexual abuse claims arose and the identity of certain of the parties that are implicated in the alleged sexual abuse. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a chart that shows the sexual abuse claims broken down by the year in which they first arose. Please note that there approximately 10,500 claims did not provide a date for when the sexual abuse occurred. As a result, those claims have not been assigned a year in which the abuse first arose. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the state or jurisdiction in which they arose. Please note there are approximately 7,186 claims that did not provide a location of abuse. Those claims are reflected by YY or ZZ in the codes used to identify the applicable state or jurisdiction. Those claims have not been assigned a state or other jurisdiction. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the Local Council implicated in the sexual abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Kane County, Utah Resource Management Plan
    Kane County Resource Management Plan Adopted 28 November 2011 KANE COUNTY, UTAH RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN For the Physical Development of the Unincorporated Area Pursuant to Section 17-27-301 of the Utah Code ADOPTED 28 NOVEMBER 2011 Should any part of the Kane County Resource Management Plan be determined invalid, no longer applicable or need modification, those changes shall affect only those parts of the Plan that are deleted, invalidated or modified and shall have no effect on the remainder of the Resource Management Plan. This document was prepared by the Division of Community and Economic Development of the Five County Association of Governments under the guidance and direction of the Kane County Resource Development Committee, Kane County Land Use Authority and the Board of County Commissioners. Funding used to prepare this document came from Kane County contributions, a Regional Planning grant from the Utah Permanent Community Impact Board and a Planning and Technical Assistance Grant from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration. - 1 - Kane County Resource Management Plan Adopted 28 November 2011 Acknowledgments Every effective planning process includes a multitude of individuals if it is to be successful. This effort is no different. Many individuals have had an impact upon the preparation and adoption of this Plan. However, most important are the residents of Kane County, who have responded to surveys, interviews, and attended public meetings and hearings. All who did so should be commended for their desire to be a participant in determining the future of Kane County. Some specific individuals and groups have had intensive involvement in the Kane County planning process, and are acknowledged below: Kane County Commission Kane County Land Use Authority Doug Heaton, Chairman Shannon McBride, Land Use Administrator Dirk Clayson Tony Chelewski, Chairman Jim Matson Roger Chamberlain Wade Heaton Kane County Staff Robert Houston Verjean Caruso, Co.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001
    CALIFORNIA HISTORIC MILITARY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES INVENTORY VOLUME I: INVENTORIES OF HISTORIC BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES ON CALIFORNIA MILITARY INSTALLATIONS Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 Prepared by: FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION Sacramento, California 95834 and JRP JRP HISTORICAL CONSULTING SERVICES Davis, California 95616 March2000 Calirornia llisloric Miliiary Buildings and Structures Inventory, \'olume I CONTENTS Page CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................... i FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................ ii TABLES ......................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................... viii SERIES INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ ix 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1-1 I. I Purpose and Goals ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Canyon Council Oa Where to Go Camping Guide
    GRAND CANYON COUNCIL OA WHERE TO GO CAMPING GUIDE GRAND CANYON COUNCIL, BSA OA WHERE TO GO CAMPING GUIDE Table of Contents Introduction to The Order of the Arrow ....................................................................... 1 Wipala Wiki, The Man .................................................................................................. 1 General Information ...................................................................................................... 3 Desert Survival Safety Tips ........................................................................................... 4 Further Information ....................................................................................................... 4 Contact Agencies and Organizations ............................................................................. 5 National Forests ............................................................................................................. 5 U. S. Department Of The Interior - Bureau Of Land Management ................................ 7 Maricopa County Parks And Recreation System: .......................................................... 8 Arizona State Parks: .................................................................................................... 10 National Parks & National Monuments: ...................................................................... 11 Tribal Jurisdictions: ..................................................................................................... 13 On the Road: National
    [Show full text]