Internet Essentials from Comcast

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

If your child receives free school lunches, you may qualify for Internet EssentialsSM from Comcast. Bring the Internet home for just $9.95 a month. The world has gone digital. Internet service has become essential for success. That’s why we created Internet Essentials. It’s available to households with children who receive free school lunches under the National School Lunch Program. While participating in Internet Essentials, customers will receive: AFFORDABLE INTERNET $ 95 no • price increases a month • activation fees Get fast Internet service so the whole 9 + tax • equipment rental fees family can enjoy: • Email • Homework • Sharing photos A LOW-COST • Job searches COMPUTER FREE • Paying bills online INTERNET TRAINING • Watching videos Available Available online, in print at initial • + tax and in person Downloading music enrollment • And so much more! Sign up today! Call toll-free: 1-855-8-INTERNET (1-855-846-8376). For more information visit: InternetEssentials.com. Restrictions apply. Not available in all areas. Limited to XFINITY® Internet Economy service for new residential customers meeting certain eligibility criteria. Advertised price applies to a single outlet. Actual speeds vary and are not guaranteed. After initial participation, if a customer is determined to be no longer eligible for the program but continues to receive Comcast service, regular rates will apply. Subject to Internet Essentials program terms and conditions. Call 1-855-846-8376 for restrictions and complete details, or visit InternetEssentials.com. ©2011 Comcast. All rights reserved. Internet Essentials is a program to provide home Internet service for families. It is not a school program, and is not endorsed or required by your school. Your school is not responsible for Internet Essentials accounts. .
Recommended publications
  • Comcast/NBC Universal Merger CASE STUDY

    Comcast/NBC Universal Merger CASE STUDY

    Comcast/NBC Universal Merger CASE STUDY Client In 2010, US cable company Comcast, a Multichannel Video Programming Distributor, and NBC Universal Inc (NBCU), a broadcast and for-pay programming provider, sought BLOOMBERG TV government approval for their proposed merger. During the merger review, Bates White Partner, Duke University professor, and former FCC chief economist Leslie M. Industry Marx submitted a report on behalf of Bloomberg TV, a video programming provider that had concerns about the merger impeding its effective competition in this market. COMMUNICATIONS Professor Marx suggested a number of remedies that were subsequently imposed on the merging parties by the FCC. Professor Marx showed how the integration between NBCU-owned CNBC, the dominant business channel, and Comcast, the dominant programming distributor in areas where demand for financial news is highest (e.g., New York and Chicago), would greatly increase the merged firm’s ability and incentive to anticompetitively foreclose Bloomberg TV from accessing end users (TV viewers and Internet users). After explaining the economic theories that led to a conclusion regarding competitive harm from the merger’s vertical integration, Professor Marx empirically measured the extent to which the merged firm could distort competition in the provision of financial news programming. Among other avenues, competitive harm could come from Comcast’s refusal to include Bloomberg TV in some of its programming bundles. This action would place Bloomberg TV in a tier with fewer subscribers, thereby disadvantaging Bloomberg TV and making end users more likely to turn to CNBC. Professor Marx also proposed conditions that could alleviate the anticipated competitive harms she had identified.
  • Moments That Matter Executive Summary 2017 Corporate Social Responsibility Report (Covering 2016)

    Moments That Matter Executive Summary 2017 Corporate Social Responsibility Report (Covering 2016)

    Moments that matter Executive Summary 2017 Corporate Social Responsibility Report (covering 2016) At Comcast NBCUniversal, we bring people closer to what matters. To the moments of purpose and passion that make our world a better place. About our commitment “Across all of our businesses “As a technology and broadband and platforms, we have a unique leader, it is our responsibility opportunity to connect people and obligation to do what to the moments that matter we can to help close the most to them.” digital divide.” BRIAN L. ROBERTS DAVID L. COHEN Chairman and CEO Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Diversity Officer From our place as one of the largest media, technology, and broadband companies in the world, we have the unique ability to help solve some of the most challenging social issues of our time. Our impact starts with our philanthropy and volunteerism, and it grows with our efforts to connect the unconnected and our ability to amplify the voices of today’s change- makers in our communities and within our own walls. That’s why we invest in digital inclusion, foster the brightest innovators and entrepreneurs, and spotlight young, diverse filmmakers. It’s why we hold up the microphone for community problem-solvers, and uphold and empower our own Comcast NBCUniversal family to make a lasting difference. Our influence and reach make it possible to create a positive impact every day. $500+ million In 2016, Comcast NBCUniversal provided more than $500 million in cash and in-kind contributions to local and national organizations that share our commitment to improving communities.
  • Internet Freedom in China: U.S. Government Activity, Private Sector Initiatives, and Issues of Congressional Interest

    Internet Freedom in China: U.S. Government Activity, Private Sector Initiatives, and Issues of Congressional Interest

    Internet Freedom in China: U.S. Government Activity, Private Sector Initiatives, and Issues of Congressional Interest Patricia Moloney Figliola Specialist in Internet and Telecommunications Policy May 18, 2018 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R45200 Internet Freedom in China: U.S. Government and Private Sector Activity Summary By the end of 2017, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) had the world’s largest number of internet users, estimated at over 750 million people. At the same time, the country has one of the most sophisticated and aggressive internet censorship and control regimes in the world. PRC officials have argued that internet controls are necessary for social stability, and intended to protect and strengthen Chinese culture. However, in its 2017 Annual Report, Reporters Without Borders (Reporters Sans Frontières, RSF) called China the “world’s biggest prison for journalists” and warned that the country “continues to improve its arsenal of measures for persecuting journalists and bloggers.” China ranks 176th out of 180 countries in RSF’s 2017 World Press Freedom Index, surpassed only by Turkmenistan, Eritrea, and North Korea in the lack of press freedom. At the end of 2017, RSF asserted that China was holding 52 journalists and bloggers in prison. The PRC government employs a variety of methods to control online content and expression, including website blocking and keyword filtering; regulating and monitoring internet service providers; censoring social media; and arresting “cyber dissidents” and bloggers who broach sensitive social or political issues. The government also monitors the popular mobile app WeChat. WeChat began as a secure messaging app, similar to WhatsApp, but it is now used for much more than just messaging and calling, such as mobile payments, and all the data shared through the app is also shared with the Chinese government.
  • The Internet and "Telecommunications Services," Universal Service Mechanisms, Access Charges, and Other Flotsam of the Regulatory System

    The Internet and "Telecommunications Services," Universal Service Mechanisms, Access Charges, and Other Flotsam of the Regulatory System

    The Internet and "Telecommunications Services," Universal Service Mechanisms, Access Charges, and Other Flotsam of the Regulatory System Jonathan Weinbergt In troduction .............................................................................................. 2 11 I. B ackground ...................................................................................... 2 14 A . InternetA rchitecture................................................................ 215 B . Telephone Regulation .............................................................. 217 1. The Federal-State Divide ................................................. 218 2. Comp uter II ...................................................................... 220 3. The 1996 Telecommunications Act ................................. 222 II. The Internet and Universal Service Mechanisms ............................ 225 A. The Report to Congress on Universal Service ......................... 225 B. The Breakdown of the Telecommunications/InformationService D istinction................................................................................ 227 C. Why the Telecommunications/InformationService D istinction Doesn't Work ........................................................ 232 D. Universal Service Redux .......................................................... 234 III. The Internet and Access Charges .................................................... 239 A . The Status Q uo ......................................................................... 239 B . Beyond the
  • Mass Media in the USA»

    Mass Media in the USA»

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by BSU Digital Library Mass Media In The USA K. Khomtsova, V. Zavatskaya The topic of the research is «Mass media in the USA». It is topical because mass media of the United States are world-known and a lot of people use American mass media, especially internet resources. The subject matter is peculiarities of different types of mass media in the USA. The aim of the survey is to study the types of mass media that are popular in the USA nowadays. To achieve the aim the authors fulfill the following tasks: 1. to define the main types of mass media in the USA; 2. to analyze the popularity of different kinds of mass media in the USA; 3. to mark out the peculiarities of American mass media. The mass media are diversified media technologies that are intended to reach a large audience by mass communication. There are several types of mass media: the broadcast media such as radio, recorded music, film and tel- evision; the print media include newspapers, books and magazines; the out- door media comprise billboards, signs or placards; the digital media include both Internet and mobile mass communication. [4]. In the USA the main types of mass media today are: newspapers; magazines; radio; television; Internet. NEWSPAPERS The history of American newspapers goes back to the 17th century with the publication of the first colonial newspapers. It was James Franklin, Benjamin Franklin’s older brother, who first made a news sheet.
  • Philadelphia

    Philadelphia

    Business TV Basic SD HD SD HD SD HD SD HD 2 601 KJWP Me TV 9 602 WTXF - Fox 20 614 WWSI - Telemundo 191 HSN 3 604 KYW - CBS 10 610 WCAU - NBC 21 607 QVC 615 WPPX ION 5 605 WPSG - CW 12 612 WHYY - PBS 22 609 HSN 853-902 Music Choice 6 606 WPVI - ABC Affiliate 13 613 WNJN PBS 24 603 WUVP - Univision Digital Music 7 617 WPHL 15 WLVT - PBS 25 Retro TV 8 608 RCN TV 19 WFMZ - Independent 190 QVC Business TV News SD HD SD HD SD HD SD HD 126 550 BBC America 305 650 CNN Custom 311 652 MSNBC 320 655 TWC 189 Discover Lehigh 306 656 CNN Headline News 315 653 Fox News Channel 322 Fusion Valley 310 651 CNBC 316 654 Fox Business 325 657 Bloomberg 301 C-SPAN Network Business TV Entertainment SD HD SD HD SD HD SD HD 101 619 BET 115 637 E! Entertainment 221 669 TV Land 333 660 Travel 105 620 A&E 116 658 truTV 222 641 Freeform 335 661 Discovery 106 621 Bravo 141 596 FXM 224 642 Food 340 662 History 107 622 TBS 142 667 American Movie 225 643 HGTV 345 663 TLC 108 623 TNT Classics 241 649 Nickelodeon 350 670 Nat Geo 109 624 USA 160 675 MTV 250 647 Disney 362 698 FXX 111 626 FX 165 676 VH1 256 Sprout 202 639 Lifetime Business TV Sports SD HD SD HD SD HD SD HD 363 681 ESPN 370 685 Comcast 376 YES National 389 690 NFL Network 364 682 ESPN 2 Sportsnet PA 380 575 CBS College Sports 391 695 MLB Network 365 683 ESPNEWS 372 686 Big Ten Network 381 694 The Golf Channel 392 697 NBA TV 368 680 ESPNU 374 MSG National 382 691 NBC Sports Network 375 689 Fox Sports 1 388 693 NHL Network Philadelphia Not all channels are available in all areas.
  • Adelphia-Time Warner=Comcast Transaction Is Not in the Public I N Terest

    Adelphia-Time Warner=Comcast Transaction Is Not in the Public I N Terest

    Adelphia-Time Warner=Comcast Transaction is Not in the Public In terest CWA Presentation to FCC February 22,2006 Transaction is Not in the Public Interest . Anti-Competitive Impact . Negative Impact on Employees 2 Part 1. Anti-Competitive Impact . Cable companies have already used their market power to stifle video competition by limiting access to Regional Sports Networks or raising prices w The transaction will significantly increase market power in regions with RSNs Cable companies will have even more incentive and power to limit prospective Telco competitors 3 Cable Companies Have Utilized their Market Power over RSNs to Stifle Current DBS Competition . Exclusive Deals Comcast in Philadelphia has exclusive access to its RSN that carries Phillies, 76ers and Flyers Time Warner in Charlotte obtained exclusive access to an unaffiliated RSN that carried Bobcats games - even after this RSN went off the air Bobcat games are still only carried by Time Warner. 9 Increased Rates Comcast in Chicago bought the RSN and doubled the rate charged to DirecTV Time Warner in Cleveland has exclusive marketing deal with a new RSN that only carries Indians games but is charging competitors a rate that is almost the same as previously paid to carry Indians, Cavaliers, Reds and Blue Jackets games. Comcast and Time Warner own Sportsnet NY a new RSN that will carry Mets games but is charging higher prices than the YES network that carries Yankees games - even though the Mets have 1/3 the ratings The Impact of Cable’s Strategy: Less Competition Where cable companies have exclusive Regional Sports Networks, satellite penetration is half the national rate National Satellite Penetration 25.1 percent San Diego (Cox exclusive Padres) 12.8 percent .
  • Spinco to Be Known As Greatland Connections Inc

    Spinco to Be Known As Greatland Connections Inc

    Filed by Charter Communications Inc. Pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act of 1933 and deemed filed pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Subject Company: Charter Communications Inc. Commission File No. 001-33664 The following is a joint press release that was issued on September 3, 2014 by Charter Communications, Inc. and Comcast Corporation: SpinCo to be known as GreatLand Connections Inc. STAMFORD, Conn. and PHILADELPHIA - September 3, 2014 - Charter Communications, Inc. (NASDAQ:CHTR) and Comcast Corporation (NASDAQ: CMCSA, CMCSK) today announced the name of the new cable company that will be spun off from Comcast upon completion of the Comcast - Time Warner Cable merger and the Comcast - Charter transactions. The company referred to as “SpinCo” or “Midwest Cable LLC” will be known as GreatLand Connections Inc. “We are pleased to publicly announce the name of this exciting new company we are building,” said Michael Willner, President and Chief Executive Officer of GreatLand Connections. “The name GreatLand Connections pays homage to the rich history and striking geographies of the diverse communities in which the company will operate. It brings to mind our commitment to connecting people and businesses with terrific products and excellent service in the almost 1000 historic communities - large and small - across the 11 states we will serve.” GreatLand Connections Inc., a new, independent, publicly-traded company, will own and operate former Comcast systems serving approximately 2.5 million customers across the Midwest and Southeast. At its inception, it is expected to be the fifth largest cable company in the United States.
  • Internet Essentials from Comcast Has Helped 10 Million Low-Income Americans Connect to the Tools and Resources They Need to Succeed in an Increasingly Digital World

    Internet Essentials from Comcast Has Helped 10 Million Low-Income Americans Connect to the Tools and Resources They Need to Succeed in an Increasingly Digital World

    Internet Essentials from Comcast has helped 10 million low-income Americans connect to the tools and resources they need to succeed in an increasingly digital world. TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter from Dave Watson .................................................................2 Digital Divide in the U.S. ...................................................................5 Program Timeline ............................................................................6 Program Retrospective .....................................................................8 Program Design ............................................................................ 10 Elements of Success ...................................................................... 16 Program Impact ................................................................................ 20 What’s Next ....................................................................................... 24 Commitment to Digital Equity ........................................................ 26 Student from Northeast High School III 1 Letter from Dave Watson $ about Comcast’s Commitment 7to 00Digital EquityM When we launched Internet Essentials 10 years ago, we began an ambitious journey to connect low-income Americans to the Internet. Thanks to the hard work and support of so many, Internet Essentials is now the largest and most comprehensive Internet adoption program in the country, connecting more than 10 million* people. Ten million people over 10 years is an exciting milestone, but it’s just the beginning
  • Digital Subscriber Lines and Cable Modems Digital Subscriber Lines and Cable Modems

    Digital Subscriber Lines and Cable Modems Digital Subscriber Lines and Cable Modems

    Digital Subscriber Lines and Cable Modems Digital Subscriber Lines and Cable Modems Paul Sabatino, [email protected] This paper details the impact of new advances in residential broadband networking, including ADSL, HDSL, VDSL, RADSL, cable modems. History as well as future trends of these technologies are also addressed. OtherReports on Recent Advances in Networking Back to Raj Jain's Home Page Table of Contents ● 1. Introduction ● 2. DSL Technologies ❍ 2.1 ADSL ■ 2.1.1 Competing Standards ■ 2.1.2 Trends ❍ 2.2 HDSL ❍ 2.3 SDSL ❍ 2.4 VDSL ❍ 2.5 RADSL ❍ 2.6 DSL Comparison Chart ● 3. Cable Modems ❍ 3.1 IEEE 802.14 ❍ 3.2 Model of Operation ● 4. Future Trends ❍ 4.1 Current Trials ● 5. Summary ● 6. Glossary ● 7. References http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/~jain/cis788-97/rbb/index.htm (1 of 14) [2/7/2000 10:59:54 AM] Digital Subscriber Lines and Cable Modems 1. Introduction The widespread use of the Internet and especially the World Wide Web have opened up a need for high bandwidth network services that can be brought directly to subscriber's homes. These services would provide the needed bandwidth to surf the web at lightning fast speeds and allow new technologies such as video conferencing and video on demand. Currently, Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) and Cable modem technologies look to be the most cost effective and practical methods of delivering broadband network services to the masses. <-- Back to Table of Contents 2. DSL Technologies Digital Subscriber Line A Digital Subscriber Line makes use of the current copper infrastructure to supply broadband services.
  • Xumo Taps Newsy As News Content Partner on Its Smart TV Platform

    Xumo Taps Newsy As News Content Partner on Its Smart TV Platform

    Xumo taps Newsy as news content partner on its smart TV platform Oct. 27, 2015 CINCINNATI – Viewers of Newsy, the leading over-the-top video news service that brings context and perspective to a growing millennial audience, will now have another way to access its content. As part of a deal announced today, Newsy will offer a channel on Xumo, a new connected TV technology platform that provides free access to programming across multiple content delivery options. The partnership provides for easy viewing of Newsy’s live and on-demand content on smart television sets. Newsy is a wholly owned subsidiary of The E.W. Scripps Company (NYSE: SSP). The deal is the latest in Newsy’s growing roster of OTT distribution partners, which also includes Comcast’s Watchable, Pluto TV, Roku and Amazon Fire TV. Xumo viewers will be able to view Newsy via Newsy Live, a continually updated feed of the day’s top stories as well as hourly updates from the newsroom, as well as on-demand. “With connected TV households reaching majority this year, Newsy’s partnership with Xumo is all about positioning the company to deliver our brand of journalism when and where our younger audience is seeking it,” said Blake Sabatinelli, general manager of Newsy. Xumo sought to strengthen its news offerings with Newsy’s world and national news coverage across verticals including politics, entertainment, science and technology. Newsy is known for delivering video news and analysis of the top stories from around the world, without the hype and bias found in some other news providers.
  • Achieving "The Franchise": the Comcast-Nbc Universal Merger and the New Media Marketplace

    Achieving "The Franchise": the Comcast-Nbc Universal Merger and the New Media Marketplace

    ACHIEVING "THE FRANCHISE": THE COMCAST-NBC UNIVERSAL MERGER AND THE NEW MEDIA MARKETPLACE Thomas Curtint I. INTRODUCTION In 1997, then-Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC" or "Commission") Reed Hundt delivered a speech to the leaders of the cable industry in which he described the future of cable television in terms of what he called "the Franchise."' According to Hundt, this model "consists of the core package of the most popular TV channels and the most popular way to deliver them." Hundt acknowledged that the cable industry "has made huge inroads on the delivery side," and classified broadcast television as "the other side of the Franchise." 2 The Chairman further forecasted that "the core pro- gramming package may or may not be possessed by local broadcasters in the future."' Nearly thirteen years after Chairman Hundt foretold an all-in-one entertain- ment content and delivery service, the Comcast Corporation ("Comcast") is on its way to realizing this vision of "the Franchise," as the media delivery giant undertakes efforts to merge with NBC Universal.' If successful, the merger would give the nation's largest cable corporation control over NBC Univer- t J.D. Candidate, May 2011. Tom would like to thank his parents, Thomas and Donna Curtin, his brother Frank and his extended family for always encouraging the writing proc- ess. He would also like to thank his friends for their constant support, and the Editors and Associates of COMMLAW CONSPECTUS Volumes 18 and 19 for their valued input and advice. I Reed Hundt, Chairman, Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, Speech at the National Cable Television Association: Cable, Broadcasting, and The Franchise (Mar.