DOCSLIB.ORG

Navigating the Tenure Process 2012 Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Navigating the Tenure Process 2012 Report Newsletter of the Committee on the Status of Women in the Economics Profession Winter 2013 Published triennially by the American Economic Association’s Committee on the Status of Women Visit CSWEP.org in the Economics Profession Navigating the Tenure Process Introduction The Tenure Process at The Tenure Process at Tenure Letters Should I Stay or Should I by Petra Todd Research Universities Liberal Arts Colleges by Rachel Croson Go Now? page 3 by Petra Todd page 4 by Cecilia Conrad page 7 page 9 by Donna K. Ginther page 10 Finkelstein wins John 2012 REPORT Bates Clark Medal of the COMMITTEE on the Amy Finkelstein, the 2008 winner of STATUS of WOMEN in the the Elaine Bennett Award, won the ECONOMICS PROFESSION John Bates Clark medal awarded bi- ennially by the American Econom- submitted by Marjorie B. McElroy, ics Association to the top economist CSWEP Chair under age 40. Finkelstein is the Ford The American Economic Associa- Professor of Economics at the Mas- tion created the Committee on the sachusetts Institute of Technology, Status of Women in the Economics from which she received her PhD Profession (CSWEP) and charged in Economics in 2001. She holds it to monitor the status of women an undergraduate degree in Govern- in the profession and to undertake CONTENTS ment from Harvard University and professional activities to improve 2012 CSWEP Report page 1, 15–24 an M.Phil in Economics from Oxford this status. In addition to surveying University, where she was a Marshall CSWEP Board, Directory page 2 all U.S. economics departments for Scholar. its annual statistical report, CSWEP From the Chair page 2, 26 Finkelstein works at the intersec- sponsors six competitive-entry paper Feature Articles: tion of public economics and health continued on page 15 Tenure Process pages 3–14 economics. The award committee Top Ten Tips page 14 recognized Professor Finkelstein for her ability to identify important and CSWEP Sponsored Sessions TOP TEN TIPS at the Midwest Economic policy-relevant research areas and FOR WRITING Association Meeting page 27 her careful and convincing empirical Calls for Papers and Abstracts page 27 work. The committee also noted her RESEARCH, TEACHING, & SERVICE sophisticated methods and impor- Session Summaries available online tant contributions to the literature on STATEMENTS Upcoming Regional insurance markets. PLEASE SEE PAGE 14 Meetings back cover continued on page 25 DIRECTORY OF CSWEP BOARD MEMBERS From the Chair Marjorie McElroy, Serena Ng CSWEP Chair Professor of Economics Professor of Economics Columbia University CSWEP at the ASSA/AEA Meetings, Duke University, Box 90097 1012 International Affairs January 2013 Durham, NC 27708-0097 Building (919) 660-1840 420 W 118th St. Some 65 old and new friends of CSWEP gathered FAX: (919) 684-8974 New York, NY 10027 Business Meeting to review CESWEP activities [email protected] (212) 854-5488 and the status of women in the profession and to FAX (212) 854-8059 celebrate the recipient of the Carolyn Shaw Bell Award, Catherine Eck- Susan Averett [email protected] [CSWEP East] el of Texas A&M. Given annually to an individual who has furthered Professor of Economics Petra Todd the status of women in the economics profession, Eckel presented Lafayette College Professor of Economics an inspiring view of mentoring. In addition, given biennially for out- Easton, PA 18042 McNeil 160 standing research by a woman near the beginning of her career, this (610) 330-5307 University of Pennsylvania year the Bennett Prize was awarded to Anna Mikusheva of MIT. Three FAX (610) 330-5715 3718 Locust Walk [email protected] Philadelphia, PA 19104 of the six winners to date have gone on to win the Clark Medal. Miku- CSWEP East: http://www.iona. (215) 898-4084 sheva will receive her prize at the 2014 Business Meeting. edu/eea/ FAX (215) 573-2057 The 2013 AEA Meeting in San Diego saw the first CSWEP Cecilia Conrad [email protected] Mentoring Breakfast. Thirty senior women mentors and the first 110 Vice President and Dean junior economists who applied gathered for a modest breakfast and a Pomona College Shelly White-Means [CSWEP South] rich networking experience. A meet and greet affair, participants could 425 N. College Avenue, #211 pick a table associated with a topic such as research, handling ref- Claremont, CA 91711 Professor of Economics (909) 621-8328 University of Tennessee eree reports, teaching, grants, work-life balance or they could enter FAX: (909) 621-8576 Suite 205N Johnson Building more open-ended discussions. Many had their immediate questions [email protected] 847 Monroe Avenue answered. Others initiated peer-to-peer or junior-senior mentoring re- Memphis, TN 38163 Linda Goldberg (901) 448-7666 lationships. The discussions went on long after the breakfast officially Vice President of International [email protected] ended. Congratulations to Linda Goldberg and Terra McKinnish for Research creating and organizing this new way to mentor. Look for repeats at International Research Function Anne Winkler future AEA meetings. [CSWEP Midwest] Federal Reserve Bank of New York The Executive Committee of the AEA continued to endorse the Ce- 33 Liberty Street Professor of Economics New York, NY 10045 University of Missouri–St. Louis MENT national and regional mentoring workshops by continuing (212) 720-2836 One University Boulevard funding for the workshop organizers through 2014. The sentiment FAX: (212) 20-6831 St. Louis, MO 63121 of the Executive Committee favored expanding these workshops and [email protected] (314) 516-5563 work is underway to find a feasible way to do so. FAX (314) 516-5352 Jennifer Imazeki [email protected] The Executive Committee of the AEA continued to endorse the Ce- [CSWEP West] CSWEP Midwest: http://web. MENT national and regional mentoring workshops by continuing Associate Professor of Economics grinnell.edu/mea/ funding for the workshop organizers. The sentiment of the Executive San Diego State University Committee favored expanding these workshops and work is underway 5500 Camponile Drive Madeline Zavodny, to find a feasible way to do so. San Diego, CA 92187 Newsletter Oversight (619) 867-4408 Editor As usual, competitive submissions to CSWEP generated six lively FAX (619) 594-5062 Professor of Economics AEA paper sessions, three on gender-related issues organized by Su- [email protected] Agnes Scott College san Averett and Kevin Lang and three on health organized by Frank CSWEP West: http://www.weain- 141 E. College Ave. Sloan and Shelley White-Means. After reviews, eight of these 24 pa- ternational.org/ Decatur, GA 30030 pers were selected for publication and are forthcoming in the Papers Kevin Lang, at large (404) 471-6377 [email protected] and Proceedings issue of the AER in May 2013. Professor of Economics Looking forward to the 2014 ASSA/AEA Meetings in Philadel- Boston University, Room 302A Boston, MA 02215 phia, CSWEP will organize three sessions on gender-related topics (617) 353-5694 and three sessions on structural econometrics. Look for the AEA 2013 FAX: (617) 353-4449 call for papers in this Newsletter, in the summer Journal of Economic [email protected] NEWSLETTER STAFF continued on page 26 Terra McKinnish, CeMENT Marjorie McElroy, Editor Associate Professor of Economics Petra Todd, Co-editor University of Colorado What is CSWEP? Boulder, CO 80309 Helen Kalevas, Assistant Editor CSWEP (the Committee on the Status of Women in the Economics Profession) is a stand- (303) 492-6770 Madeline Zavodny, Oversight ing committee of the AEA (American Economics Association). It was founded in 1971 to FAX (303) 492-8960 Editor monitor the position of women in the economics profession and to undertake activities Leda Black, Graphic Designer to improve that position. Our thrice yearly newsletters are one of those activities. See our [email protected] website at www.cswep.org for more information on what we are doing. 2 CSWEP Newsletter Winter 2013 Feature Articles Navigating the Tenure Process Introduction by Petra Todd, University of Pennsylvania he theme of the articles in this CSWEP newsletter is navigating the tenure process at different kinds of institutions. The articles describe Thow the process works and offer tips on steps that a junior faculty member can take to maximize the chances of a favorable outcome. One ar- ticle also considers the relative benefits of going on the market during the tenure-track period. In “The Tenure Process at Research Universities,” researchers even when you may be the only person I provide an overview of how the tenure process in your department working in your field, and how to works at research-oriented institutions. The ar- continually improve your teaching skills. ticle describes how the process starts, the people Most institutions require that people who come involved, the different elements of the dossier, the up for tenure get so-called tenure letters from ex- different types of evaluation criteria, and the weight ternal evaluators. Although it may seem that this based on different criteria. With multiple demands part of the tenure process is completely uncontrol- on a junior faculty member’s time, it can be diffi- lable, given that the evaluators are not usually from cult to decide where best to allocate effort in a way the candidate’s institution and most are not chosen that ultimately will support a case for tenure. This by the candidate, there are in fact several strategies article provides guidance as to how to divide your that junior faculty can pursue during the time lead- time between activities, such as research, teaching, ing up to tenure. Rachel Croson discusses ways of applying for grants, attending conferences, giving getting senior people to know about you and your seminars, and advising students and where to con- work. She explains the importance of thinking about centrate your efforts early in your career.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How Universal School Vouchers Affect Educational And
    How Universal School Vouchers Affect Educational and Labor Market Outcomes: Evidence from Chile David Bravo Sankar Mukhopadhyay Petra E. Todd1 1David Bravo is Professor of Economics at the University of Chile and Director of the Microdata Center. Sankar Mukhodpadhyay is Assistant Professor of Economics at the University of Nevada. Petra Todd is Professor of Economics at the University of Pennsylvania. A preliminary version of this paper was presented at a conference in Amsterdam in May, 2008 and at the annual meeting of the Society of Chilean economists in September, 2008. We thank Jere R. Behrman, Sergio Urzua, and Kenneth I. Wolpin for helpful discussions. We are grateful for research support from a grant from the Spencer Foundation. We also acknowledge the support in the form of a pilot grant from the National Institutes of Health - National Institute on Aging, Grant number P30 AG12836, the Boettner Center for Pensions and Retirement Security at the University of Pennsylvania, and National Institutes of Health - National Institute of Child Health and Development Population Research Infrastructure Program R24 HD-044964, all at the University of Pennsylvania. Abstract This paper studies the effects of school vouchers in Chile, which adopted a nationwide school voucher program 28 years ago. Chile has a relatively unregulated, decentralized, competitive market in primary and secondary education and therefore provides a unique setting in which to study how voucher programs affect school choice as well as educational attainment and labor market outcomes. This paper develops and estimates a dynamic model of schooling and work decisions using data from the 2002 Historia Laboral y Seguridad Social and the 2004 Enquesta Proteccion Social (EPS) surveys.
    [Show full text]
  • Behrman 2011
    Do Conditional Cash Transfers for Schooling Generate Lasting Benefits? A Five-Year Followup of PROGRESA/Oportunidades Jere R. Behrman Susan W. Parker Petra E. Todd ABSTRACT Conditional cash transfer (CCT) programs link public transfers to human capital investment in hopes of alleviating current poverty and reducing its intergenerational transmission. However, little is known about their long- term impacts. This paper evaluates longer-run impacts on schooling and work of the best-known CCT program, Mexico’s PROGRESA/Oportunida- des, using experimental and nonexperimental estimators based on groups with different program exposure. The results show positive impacts on schooling, reductions in work for younger youth (consistent with postpon- ing labor force entry), increases in work for older girls, and shifts from agricultural to nonagricultural employment. The evidence suggests school- ing effects are robust with time. Jere R. Behrman is the W. R. Kenan Jr. Professor of Economics and Sociology and PSC research associ- ate at the University of Pennsylvania. Susan W. Parker is a professor/researcher in the Division of Eco- nomics at the Center for Research and Teaching in Economics (CIDE) in Mexico City. Petra E. Todd is professor of economics and a research associate of PSC at the University of Pennsylvania, the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) and the Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). This work received support from the Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica (INSP) and the Mellon Foundation/Population Studies Center (PSC)/University of Pennsylvania grant to Todd (P.I.) on “Long-term Impact Evaluation of the Oportunidades Program in Rural Mexico.” The authors thank three anonymous referees, Bernardo Herna´ndez, Iliana Yaschine and seminar participants at the University of Pennsylvania, the World Bank, and the University of Goettingen for helpful comments on early versions of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Economics 673 Econometrics of Program Evaluation Geert Ridder John Strauss KAP 310A KAP 318A [email protected] [email protected]
    Economics 673 Econometrics of Program Evaluation Geert Ridder John Strauss KAP 310A KAP 318A [email protected] [email protected] 740-3511 740-7698 Office hours: Thu 11-12 Mo 11-1 This course is designed to provide econometric theory and applications on the subject of program evaluation. We will explore the following topics in this course: Social Experiments Difference in difference estimators Matching and unconfounded assignment Regression discontinuity design Instrumental variables and local average treatment effects (LATE) Program evaluation and economic theory Organization There are weekly lectures. The grade will be based on a take home exam in the middle of the course and a paper. There are three options for the paper: (i) it can be based on research that you are involved in, (ii) it can be an exploration of an econometric method discussed in this class, e.g. a small simulation study, or (iii) it can be a critical evaluation of a (small) number of papers on a particular topic covered in the course. We encourage you to decide soon which option you will pursue so that we can give some guidance. Blackboard Some of the lecture notes will be made available on blackboard. Reading List General: Imbens, Guido and Jeffrey Wooldridge. 2009. “Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation”, Journal of Economic Literature, 47(1):5-86. Deaton, Angus. 2010. Instruments, randomization and learning about development, Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2):424-455. Heckman, James J. 2010. Building bridges between structural and program evaluation approaches to evaluating policy, Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2):356-398.
    [Show full text]
  • Slides DCDP Models As a Framework for Policy Evaluation Petra Todd
    DCDP Models as a Framework for Policy Evaluation Petra E Todd University of Pennsylvania SSSI Chicago July, 2013 Todd DCDP Models 1/118 Introduction • Based on Handbook of Labor Economics Chapter by Michael Keane, Petra Todd and Kenneth Wolpin • Introduction to the methods of structural estimation of discrete choice dynamic programming models (DCDP) for policy evaluation purposes. • The development of DCDP estimation methods over the last 25 years opened up new frontiers for empirical research in labor economics, industrial organization, economic demography, health economics, development economics and political economy • Will survey applications in labor economics and development. Todd DCDP Models 2/118 Early papers • Gotz and McCall (1984) considered the decision to re-enlist in the military • Miller (1984) the decision to change occupations • Pakes (1986) the decision to renew a patent • Rust (1987) the decision to replace a bus engine • Wolpin (1984) the decision to have a child Todd DCDP Models 3/118 Introduction to the solution and estimation of DCDP models • The development of the DCDP empirical framework was a natural extension of the static discrete choice empirical framework. • The latent variable specification is the building block for economic models of discrete choice. • Consider a binary choice model in which an economic agent with imperfect foresight, denoted by i, makes a choice at each discrete period t, from t = 1, ..T , between two alternatives dit ∈ {0, 1}. • Might be the choice of whether to accept a job offer or remain unemployed or whether to attend college or enter the labor force or whether to participate in a training program.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae for James J. Heckman
    September 13, 2021 James Joseph Heckman Department of Economics University of Chicago 1126 East 59th Street Chicago, Illinois 60637 Telephone: (773) 702-0634 Fax: (773) 702-8490 Email: [email protected] Personal Date of Birth: April 19, 1944 Place of Birth: Chicago, Illinois Education B.A. 1965 (Math) Colorado College (summa cum laude) M.A. 1968 (Econ) Princeton University Ph.D. 1971 (Econ) Princeton University Dissertation “Three Essays on Household Labor Supply and the Demand for Market Goods.” Sponsors: S. Black, H. Kelejian, A. Rees Graduate and Undergraduate Academic Honors Phi Beta Kappa Woodrow Wilson Fellow NDEA Fellow NIH Fellow Harold Willis Dodds Fellow Post-Graduate Honors Honorary Degrees and Professorships Doctor Honoris Causa, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna, Austria. Jan- uary, 2017. Doctor of Social Sciences Honoris Causa, Lignan University, Hong Kong, China. November, 2015. Honorary Doctorate of Science (Economics), University College London. September, 2013. Doctor Honoris Causis, Pontifical University, Santiago, Chile. August, 2009. Doctor Honoris Causis, University of Montreal.´ May 2004. 1 September 13, 2021 Doctor Honoris Causis, Bard College, May 2004. Doctor Honoris Causis, UAEM, Mexico. January 2003. Doctor Honoris Causis, University of Chile, Fall 2002. Honorary Doctor of Laws, Colorado College, 2001. Honorary Professor, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China, June, 2014. Honorary Professor, Renmin University, P. R. China, June, 2010. Honorary Professor, Beijing Normal University, P. R. China, June, 2010. Honorary Professor, Harbin Institute of Technology, P. R. China, October, 2007. Honorary Professor, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China, 2003. Honorary Professor, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China, 2001. Honorary Professor, University of Tucuman, October, 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Economics 250A Partial Course Outline and Reading List
    Economics 250a Partial Course Outline and Reading List This is the first course in the graduate labor economics sequence, and will focus on labor supply, labor demand, local labor markets, and simple search models. The emphasis of the course is on linking basic theoretical insights with empirical patterns in the labor market, using a combination of methodologies. Students are expected to have completed first year micro, marco, and econo- metrics courses. There will be a number of problem sets throughout the term, which all students must hand in (though working in groups is strongly encour- aged). Students are expected to have familiarity with programs like Stata and Matlab. I will be adjusting the content of the course and adding some additional readings. I will also hand out my lecture notes. I recommend reading the starred paper(s) in each section before the lecture, and as many of the other papers as possible. Lecture 1: Review of basic consumer theory; functional form, ag- gregation, discrete choice This is background material - no lecture given - but I will hand out notes. Angus Deaton and John Muellbauer, Economics and Consumer Behavior, Cambridge Press, 1980 Geoffrey Jehle and Philip Reny, Advanced Microeconomic Theory (2nd ed), Addision Wesley, 2001 Jerry Hausman, 'Exact Consumer's Surplus and Deadweight Loss' Am Econ Review 71 (Sept 1981), 662-676 John Chipman, 'Aggregation and Estimation in the Theory of Demand' History of Political Economy 38 (annual supplement), pp. 106-125. Kenneth Train. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Cambridge Press 2003. Kenneth A. Small and Harvey A. Rosen 'Applied Welfare Economics with Discrete Choice Models.' Econometrica, 49 (January 1981), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Gabrielle Vasey University of Pennsylvania
    GABRIELLE VASEY www.gabriellevasey.com [email protected] UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA Placement Director: Guillermo Ordonez [email protected] 215-898-1875 Placement Director: David Dillenberger [email protected] 215-898-1503 Graduate Student Coordinator: Gina Conway [email protected] 215-898-5691 Office Contact Information Personal Information Department of Economics Citizenship: Canada Room 528, PCPSE Languages: English (native) 133 South 36th Street French (advanced) Philadelphia, PA 19104-6297 Gender: Female 215 292-6845 Undergraduate Studies: B.S., Mathematics, St. Francis Xavier University, 2014 Masters Level Work: M.A., Economics, University of Western Ontario, 2015 M.A., Economics, University of Pennsylvania, 2019 Graduate Studies: University of Pennsylvania, 2015 to present Thesis Title: “Enrollment, Labor, and Effort: Analyzing the Educational Choices of Middle School Students in Mexico” Expected Completion Date: May 2021 Thesis Committee and References: Professor Petra Todd (Advisor) Professor Jere Behrman Department of Economics Department of Economics University of Pennsylvania University of Pennsylvania th 133 South 36th Street, Suite 606 133 South 36 Street, Suite 616 Philadelphia, PA, 19104 Philadelphia, PA, 19104 [email protected] [email protected] 215-898-4084 215-898-7704 Professor Holger Sieg Professor Arthur van Benthem Department of Economics Wharton Business Economics and Public Policy University of Pennsylvania University of Pennsylvania 133 South 36th Street, Suite 615 3733 Spruce Street, 372 Vance Hall Philadelphia, PA, 19104 Philadelphia, PA, 19104 [email protected] [email protected] 215-898-4084 215-898-3013 Fields: Development Economics, Education Economics, Environmental Economics, Empirical Microeconomics Teaching Experience: Summer, 2018 Introduction to Microeconomics, UPenn, Instructor Fall, 2017 Introduction to Microeconomics, UPenn, Instructor Spring, 2020 Advanced Econometric Techniques and Applications, UPenn, TA for Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dynamic Model of Personality, Schooling, and Occupational Choice
    A Dynamic Model of Personality, Schooling, and Occupational Choice Petra E Todd and Weilong Zhang ∗ April 25, 2018 Abstract This paper develops a dynamic model of schooling and occupational choices that incorporates person- ality traits, as measured by the so-called “Big Five" traits. The model is estimated using the longitudinal HILDA dataset from Australia. Personality traits are found to play a critical role in explaining education and occupation choices over the lifecycle. The traits evolve during young adult years but stabilize in the mid-30s. Results show that individuals with a comparative advantage in schooling and white-collar work have, on average, higher cognitive skills and higher personality trait scores. The estimated model is used to evaluate two education policies: compulsory senior secondary school and a 50% college subsidy. Both policies are found to be effective in increasing educational attainment, but the compulsory schooling policy provides greater benefits to lower socioeconomic groups. Allowing personality traits to evolve with age and with years of schooling proves to be important in capturing heterogeneity in how people respond to educational policies. JEL: C54, J24, I24, I28 Keywords: personality traits and education policies, unobserved types, lifetime inequality, dynamic discrete choice ∗Petra Todd is Edmund J. and Louise W. Kahn Term Professor of Economics at the University of Pennsylvania and a member of the U Penn Population Studies Group, NBER and IZA. Zhang is a PhD student in the U Penn economics department. The paper was presented at the Washington University Graduate Student Conference, the summer school on socioeconomic inequality at Univ of Chicago, and the ZEW summer workshop.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 January 2013 CURRICULUM VITAE NIELS-HUGO BLUNCH
    January 2013 CURRICULUM VITAE NIELS-HUGO BLUNCH Department of Economics Washington and Lee University Lexington, VA 24450, USA Phone: 540-458-8619 Email: [email protected] AREAS OF INTEREST: Development economics, labor economics, health economics, population & household economics, economics of transition, applied econometrics, program evaluation. EDUCATION: (1) DEGREE PROGRAMS: Ph.D., Economics, The George Washington University, USA (2006). Master of Science, Economics and Econometrics, University of Southampton, UK (1997). Master of Arts, Economics, University of Aarhus, Denmark (1997). Bachelor of Arts, Economics, University of Aarhus, Denmark (1994). (2) OTHER EDUCATION / SHORT COURSES: Economic Development. Denver, CO; conducted by Anne Case and Angus Deaton (2011). Advanced Econometrics: Non-Linear Models. Princeton University, NJ; conducted by Bo Honoré (2010). Econometric Theory II. Princeton University, NJ; conducted by Angus Deaton (2010). Topics in Applied Microeconometrics. The Aarhus School of Business; conducted by Rafael Lalive (2010). Cross-Section Econometrics. San Francisco, CA; conducted by Guido Imbens and Jeffrey Wooldridge (2009). Ghana: Challenges of a Developing Nation. CIEE/IFDS, The Aya Centre, Legon, Ghana and the University of Ghana at Legon; conducted by Michael Williams (2008). Public Investments in Health Capital. The Danish National Institute of Social Research; conducted by Janet Currie (2007). Econometric Evaluation of Labor Market Programs. University of Aarhus; conducted by Michael Lechner and Jeffrey Smith (2006). Empirical Strategies. University of Aarhus; conducted by Joshua Angrist (2006). Evaluating Social Programs: Econometric Cost-Benefit Analysis. University of Copenhagen; conducted by Petra Todd (2004). Presenting Data and Information. Arlington, VA; conducted by Edward Tufte (2003). Analysis of Dynamic Panel Data Models. World Bank, Washington, DC; conducted by Michael Binder (2002).
    [Show full text]
  • June, 2014 Methods for Evaluating Social Programs Petra Todd
    June, 2014 Methods for Evaluating Social Programs Petra Todd Course Description This course will examine econometric methods for evaluating e↵ects of program interventions. Typical interventions that might be of interest include job training or other active labor market programs, education programs (such as school subsidy programs), or health programs. The first part of the course will examine ex post evaluation methods that are applicable after the program has been implemented and data are available on persons who participated in the program and possibly also on a group of people who did not participate. We consider both the case where the program was randomly assigned and when assignment was not random. We will consider questions related to implementation and design of randomized experiments and methods for nonexperimental data, including regression estimators, matching estimators, control function estimators, regression discontinuity methods, IV and LATE estimators, and MTE estimators. The second part of the course will consider methods for ex ante evaluation, that is, methods for evaluating programs that do not yet exist or for evaluating modified versions of existing programs. These methods typically make more extensive use of structural models. We will consider mainly static and dynamic discrete choice finite horizon models as frameworks for social policy evaluation. It is recommended that students who take this course have a good background with microecono- metric methods, including panel data methods and nonparametric regression/density
    [Show full text]
  • Personality Traits, Intra-Household Allocation and the Gender Wage Gap
    Personality Traits, Intra-household Allocation and the Gender Wage Gap Christopher J Flinn, Petra E Todd and Weilong Zhang ∗ February 15, 2017 Abstract A model of how personality traits affect household time and resource allo- cation decisions and wages is developed and estimated. In the model, house- holds choose between two modes of behavior: cooperative or noncooperative. Spouses receive wage offers and allocate time to supplying labor market hours and to producing a public good. Personality traits, measured by the so-called Big Five traits, can affect household bargaining weights and wage offers. Model parameters are estimated by Simulated Method of Moments using the House- hold Income and Labor Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) data. Personality traits are found to be important determinants of household bargaining weights and of wage offers and to have substantial implications for understanding the sources of gender wage disparities. JEL: D1, J12, J16, J22, J31, J71 Keywords: gender wage differentials, personality and economic outcomes, household bargaining, time allocations ∗Christopher Flinn is Professor of Economics at New York University and at Collegio Carlo Alberto, Italy. Petra Todd is Edmund J. and Louise W. Kahn Term Professor of Economics at the University of Pennsylvania and a member of the U Penn Population Studies Group, NBER and IZA. Weilong Zhang is a PhD student in the U Penn economics department. 1 1 Introduction Early models of household decision-making specified a unitary model that as- sumed that a household maximizes a single utility function. (e.g. Becker (1981)) In recent decades, however, researchers have made substantial progress towards mod- eling the household as a collection of individual agents with clearly delineated pref- erences, which permits consideration of questions related to the distribution of re- sources within the household.
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Todd's Reading List
    Recommended Readings The main references are the following: Heckman, James J., Lalonde, Robert J. and Smith, James A. (1999): The Economics and Econo- metrics of Active Labor Market Programs in Handbook of Labor Economics, Volume 3A, eds. Orley C. Ashenfelter and David Card. Todd, Petra E. (2005): Evaluating Social Programs with Endogenous Program Placement and Selection of the Treated, draft of chapter under preparation for Handbook of Development Economics, downloadable from http://athena.sas.upenn.edu/ petra/papers/hae.pdf Imbens, Guido and Jeffrey M. Wooldridge (2008): \Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation," NBER working paper #14251. Todd, Petra E and Wolpin, Kenneth I. \Structural Estimation and Policy Evaluation in Devel- oping Countries, Annual Review of Economics, ed. Charles Manski. Keane, Michael, Todd, Petra E. and Wolpin, Kenneth I.\The Structural Estimation of Behavioral Models: Discrete Choice Dynamic Programming Methods and Applications, 2010, Handbook of Labor Economics, ed. David Card and Orley Ashenfelter, Volume 2, Elsevier, p. 332-461. Other Recommended Readings (1) Ex Post Evaluation Methods Matching estimators Abadie, Alberto and Guido Imbens (2006): "Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects,” Econometrica, 74, 1, 235-267. Angrist, J. and Imbens, G. "Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects” in Econometrica, March, 1994, v62, n2, p467(9). Ashenfelter, Orley (1978): Estimating the Effect of Training Programs on Earnings in Review of Economics and Statistics, 60, 47-57. Ashenfelter, Orley and David Card (1985): Using the Longitudinal Structure of Earnings to Estimate the Effect of Training Programs," in Review of Economics and Statistics, 67, 648- 660.
    [Show full text]