DOCSLIB.ORG

POSIT Jects Within 7 Days, He Or She Shall Be Deemed to Have Concurred in the Deci- AUTHORITY: Sec

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
POSIT Jects Within 7 Days, He Or She Shall Be Deemed to Have Concurred in the Deci- AUTHORITY: Sec Immigration and Naturalization Service, Justice § 213.1 Commissioner of the submission of a States, the LEA shall ensure departure Form I±854. from the United States and so inform (b) Termination of paroleÐ(1) General. the district director in whose jurisdic- The Commissioner may terminate pa- tion the alien has last resided. The dis- role for any alien (including a member trict director, if necessary, shall over- of the alien's family) in parole status see the alien's departure from the Unit- under this section where termination is ed States and, in any event, shall no- in the public interest. A district direc- tify the Commissioner of the alien's de- tor may also terminate parole when, in parture. The Commissioner shall be no- the district director's opinion, termi- tified in writing of the failure of any nation is in the public interest and cir- alien authorized parole under this cumstances do not reasonably permit paragraph to depart in accordance with referral of the case to the Commis- an order of exclusion and deportation sioner. In such a case, the Commis- entered after parole authorized under sioner shall be notified immediately. In this paragraph has been terminated. the event the Commissioner, or in the (d) Failure to comply with procedures. appropriate case, a district director, Any failure to adhere to the parole pro- decides to terminate the parole of a cedures contained in this section shall alien witness or informant authorized immediately be brought to the atten- under the terms of this paragraph, the tion of the Commissioner, who will no- Assistant Attorney General, Criminal tify the Attorney General. Division, and the relevant LEA shall be notified in writing to that effect. The [60 FR 44265, Aug. 25, 1995] Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Division, shall concur in or object to PART 213ÐADMISSION OF ALIENS that decision. Unless the Assistant At- ON GIVING BOND OR CASH DE- torney General, Criminal Division, ob- POSIT jects within 7 days, he or she shall be deemed to have concurred in the deci- AUTHORITY: Sec. 103, 66 Stat. 173; 8 U.S.C. sion. In the event of an objection by 1103. the Assistant Attorney General, Crimi- nal Division, the matter will be expedi- § 213.1 Admission under bond or cash tiously referred to the Deputy Attor- deposit. ney General for a final resolution. In The district director having jurisdic- no circumstances shall the alien or the tion over the intended place of resi- relevant LEA have a right of appeal dence of an alien may accept a public from any decision to terminate parole. charge bond prior to the issuance of an (2) Termination of parole and admission immigrant visa to the alien upon re- in S classification. When an LEA has ceipt of a request directly from a Unit- filed a request for an alien in author- ed States consular officer or upon pres- ized parole status to be admitted in S entation by an interested person of a nonimmigrant classification and that notification from the consular officer request has been approved by the Com- requiring such a bond. Upon acceptance missioner pursuant to the procedures of such a bond, the district director outlines in 8 CFR 214.2(t), the Commis- shall notify the U.S. consular officer sioner may, in the exercise of discre- who requested the bond, giving the tion: date and place of acceptance and the (i) Terminate the alien's parole sta- amount of the bond. The district direc- tus; tor having jurisdiction over the place (ii) Determine eligibility for waivers; where the examination for admission is and being conducted or the special inquiry (iii) Admit the alien in S non- officer to whom the case is referred immigrant classification pursuant to may exercise the authority contained the terms and conditions of section in section 213 of the Act. All bonds and 101(a)(15(S) of the Act and 8 CFR agreements covering cash deposits 214.2(t). given as a condition of admission of an (c) Departure. If the alien's parole has alien under section 213 of the Act shall been terminated and the alien has been be executed on Form I±352 and shall be ordered excluded from the United in the sum of not less than $1,000. The 213 VerDate 21-FEB-97 13:41 Feb 21, 1997 Jkt 174022 PO 00000 Frm 00213 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 E:\CFR\174022.022 174022 § 214.1 8 CFR Ch. I (1±1±97 Edition) officer accepting such deposit shall (v) Section 101(a)(15)(K) is divided give his receipt therefor on Form I±305. into (K)(i) for the fiance(e) and (K)(ii) For procedures relating to bond riders, for the fiance(e)'s children; and acceptable sureties, cancellation or (vi) Section 101(a)(15)(L) is divided breaching of bonds, see part 103 of this into (L)(i) for principal aliens and chapter. (L)(ii) for such alien's spouse and chil- dren. [29 FR 10579, July 30, 1964, as amended at 32 (2) Classification designations. For the FR 9626, July 4, 1967] purpose of this chapter the following nonimmigrant designations are estab- PART 214ÐNONIMMIGRANT lished. The designation in the second CLASSES column may be used to refer to the ap- propriate nonimmigrant classification. Sec. 214.1 Requirements for admission, exten- Section Designation sion, and maintenance of status. 101(a)(15)(A)(i) ......................................... A±1. 214.2 Special requirements for admission, 101(a)(15)(A)(ii) ........................................ A±2. extension, and maintenance of status. 101(a)(15)(A)(iii) ....................................... A±3. 214.3 Petitions for approval of schools. 101(a)(15)(B)(i) ......................................... B±1. 214.4 Withdrawal of school approval. 101(a)(15)(B)(ii) ........................................ B±2. 101(a)(15)(C)(i) ........................................ C±1. 214.5 Libyan and third country nationals 101(a)(15)(C)(ii) ........................................ C±2. acting on behalf of Libyan entities. 101(a)(15)(C)(iii) ....................................... C±3. 214.6 Canadian and Mexican citizens seeking 101(a)(15)(D)(i) ........................................ D±1. temporary entry to engage in business 101(a)(15)(D)(ii) ........................................ D±2. activities at a professional level. 101(a)(15)(E)(i) ......................................... E±1. 101(a)(15)(E)(ii) ........................................ E±2. AUTHORITY: 8 U.S.C. 1101, 1103, 1182, 1184, 101(a)(15)(F)(i) ......................................... F±1. 1186a, 1187, 1221, 1281, 1282; 8 CFR part 2. 101(a)(15)(F)(ii) ........................................ F±2. 101(a)(15)(G)(i) ........................................ G±1. 101(a)(15)(G)(ii) ....................................... G±2. § 214.1 Requirements for admission, 101(a)(15)(G)(iii) ....................................... G±3. extension, and maintenance of sta- 101(a)(15)(G)(iv) ...................................... G±4. tus. 101(a)(15)(g)(v) ........................................ G±5. 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(A) .................................... H±1A. (a) General. (1) Nonimmigrant classes. 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(B) .................................... H±1B. For the purpose of administering the 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(A) ................................... H±2A. 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(B) ................................... H±2B. nonimmigrant provisions of the Act, 101(a)(15)(H)(iii) ....................................... H±3. the following administrative subclassi- 101(a)(15)(H)(iv) ....................................... H±4. fications of nonimmigrant classifica- 101(a)(15)(I) ............................................. I. tions as defined in section 101(a)(15) of 101(a)(15)(J)(i) ......................................... J±1. 101(a)(15)(J)(ii) ........................................ J±2. the Act are established: 101(a)(15)(K)(i) ......................................... K±1. (i) Section 101(a)(15)(B) is divided 101(a)(15)(K)(ii) ........................................ K±2. into (B)(i) for visitors for business and 101(a)(15)(L)(i) ......................................... L±1. 101(a)(15)(L)(ii) ........................................ L±2. (B)(ii) for visitors for pleasure; 101(a)(15)(M)(i) ........................................ M±1. (ii) Section 101(a)(15)(C) is divided 101(a)(15)(M)(ii) ....................................... M±2. into (C)(i) for aliens who are not dip- 101(a)(15)(N)(i) ........................................ N±8. 101(a)(15)(N)(ii) ........................................ N±9. lomats and are in transit through the 101(a)(15)(O)(i) ........................................ O±1. United States; (C)(ii) for aliens in tran- 101(a)(15)(O)(ii) ....................................... O±2. sit to and from the United Nations 101(a)(15)(O)(iii) ....................................... O±3. Headquarters District; and (C)(iii) for 101(a)(15)(P)(i) ......................................... P±1. 101(a)(15)(P)(ii) ........................................ P±2. alien diplomats in transit through the 101(a)(15)(P)(iii) ....................................... P±3. United States; 101(a)(15)(P)(iv) ....................................... P±4. (iii) Section 101(a)(15)(H) is divided to 101(a)(15)(Q) ........................................... Q. 101(a)(15)(R)(i) ........................................ R±1. create an (H)(iv) subclassification for 101(a)(15)(R)(ii) ........................................ R±2. the spouse and children of a non- 101(a)(15)(S)(i) ......................................... S±5. immigrant classified under section 101(a)(15)(S)(ii) ........................................ S±6. 101(a)(15) (H) (i), (ii), or (iii);
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CC22 N848AE HP Jetstream 31 American Eagle 89 5 £1 CC203 OK
    CC22 N848AE HP Jetstream 31 American Eagle 89 5 £1 CC203 OK-HFM Tupolev Tu-134 CSA -large OK on fin 91 2 £3 CC211 G-31-962 HP Jetstream 31 American eagle 92 2 £1 CC368 N4213X Douglas DC-6 Northern Air Cargo 88 4 £2 CC373 G-BFPV C-47 ex Spanish AF T3-45/744-45 78 1 £4 CC446 G31-862 HP Jetstream 31 American Eagle 89 3 £1 CC487 CS-TKC Boeing 737-300 Air Columbus 93 3 £2 CC489 PT-OKF DHC8/300 TABA 93 2 £2 CC510 G-BLRT Short SD-360 ex Air Business 87 1 £2 CC567 N400RG Boeing 727 89 1 £2 CC573 G31-813 HP Jetstream 31 white 88 1 £1 CC574 N5073L Boeing 727 84 1 £2 CC595 G-BEKG HS 748 87 2 £2 CC603 N727KS Boeing 727 87 1 £2 CC608 N331QQ HP Jetstream 31 white 88 2 £1 CC610 D-BERT DHC8 Contactair c/s 88 5 £1 CC636 C-FBIP HP Jetstream 31 white 88 3 £1 CC650 HZ-DG1 Boeing 727 87 1 £2 CC732 D-CDIC SAAB SF-340 Delta Air 89 1 £2 CC735 C-FAMK HP Jetstream 31 Canadian partner/Air Toronto 89 1 £2 CC738 TC-VAB Boeing 737 Sultan Air 93 1 £2 CC760 G31-841 HP Jetstream 31 American Eagle 89 3 £1 CC762 C-GDBR HP Jetstream 31 Air Toronto 89 3 £1 CC821 G-DVON DH Devon C.2 RAF c/s VP955 89 1 £1 CC824 G-OOOH Boeing 757 Air 2000 89 3 £1 CC826 VT-EPW Boeing 747-300 Air India 89 3 £1 CC834 G-OOOA Boeing 757 Air 2000 89 4 £1 CC876 G-BHHU Short SD-330 89 3 £1 CC901 9H-ABE Boeing 737 Air Malta 88 2 £1 CC911 EC-ECR Boeing 737-300 Air Europa 89 3 £1 CC922 G-BKTN HP Jetstream 31 Euroflite 84 4 £1 CC924 I-ATSA Cessna 650 Aerotaxisud 89 3 £1 CC936 C-GCPG Douglas DC-10 Canadian 87 3 £1 CC940 G-BSMY HP Jetstream 31 Pan Am Express 90 2 £2 CC945 7T-VHG Lockheed C-130H Air Algerie
    [Show full text]
  • B-201635 Claim for Air Transportation and Warehousing Services
    THE CO MPTROLLER GENERAL DECISION .0 -i).) OF T H E U NITED S TATES W A S H I N G T C N. C 2 0 5 4 8 FILE: B-201635 DATE: February 25, 1981 MATTER OF: Nordair Ltd. DIGEST: 1. Claim based on 12 invoices for air transporta- tion and warehousing services provided under Air Force contract may not be considered since services under invoices were performed more than 6 years before claim was received by General Accounting Office. Therefore, 31 U.S.C. § 71a (1976) prevents considera- tion of claim. 2. Claim based on three invoices for similar services is denied since: (1) first invoice evidences claim against private party, not Government; (2) copy of second invoice has not been sub- mitted and record does not show any other documentation to support payment of claimed amount; and (3) third invoice evidences fuel charge which was cost to contractor, not Govern- ment. On November 7, 1979, our Office received a claim for $6,699.22 from Nordair Ltd. for the pay- ment of 15 invoices dating back to 1972 and 1973 /Nit for air transportation and warehousing services) provided to the Air Force. On November 13, 1980, our Claims Group informed Nordair that the claimed payment for 12 of the invoices (X207011, X208020, X209032, N209072, X211024, X301012, X302020, X303006, X304028, X305051, X306022, and X307013) could not be considered since the claim was received by our Office more than 6 years after the invoices' dates (all prior to September 1973), therefore, the claim for -these invoices was considered to be barred by 31 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 25 Box 31/3 Airline Codes
    March 2021 APPENDIX 25 BOX 31/3 AIRLINE CODES The information in this document is provided as a guide only and is not professional advice, including legal advice. It should not be assumed that the guidance is comprehensive or that it provides a definitive answer in every case. Appendix 25 - SAD Box 31/3 Airline Codes March 2021 Airline code Code description 000 ANTONOV DESIGN BUREAU 001 AMERICAN AIRLINES 005 CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 006 DELTA AIR LINES 012 NORTHWEST AIRLINES 014 AIR CANADA 015 TRANS WORLD AIRLINES 016 UNITED AIRLINES 018 CANADIAN AIRLINES INT 020 LUFTHANSA 023 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. (CARGO) 027 ALASKA AIRLINES 029 LINEAS AER DEL CARIBE (CARGO) 034 MILLON AIR (CARGO) 037 USAIR 042 VARIG BRAZILIAN AIRLINES 043 DRAGONAIR 044 AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS 045 LAN-CHILE 046 LAV LINEA AERO VENEZOLANA 047 TAP AIR PORTUGAL 048 CYPRUS AIRWAYS 049 CRUZEIRO DO SUL 050 OLYMPIC AIRWAYS 051 LLOYD AEREO BOLIVIANO 053 AER LINGUS 055 ALITALIA 056 CYPRUS TURKISH AIRLINES 057 AIR FRANCE 058 INDIAN AIRLINES 060 FLIGHT WEST AIRLINES 061 AIR SEYCHELLES 062 DAN-AIR SERVICES 063 AIR CALEDONIE INTERNATIONAL 064 CSA CZECHOSLOVAK AIRLINES 065 SAUDI ARABIAN 066 NORONTAIR 067 AIR MOOREA 068 LAM-LINHAS AEREAS MOCAMBIQUE Page 2 of 19 Appendix 25 - SAD Box 31/3 Airline Codes March 2021 Airline code Code description 069 LAPA 070 SYRIAN ARAB AIRLINES 071 ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES 072 GULF AIR 073 IRAQI AIRWAYS 074 KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES 075 IBERIA 076 MIDDLE EAST AIRLINES 077 EGYPTAIR 078 AERO CALIFORNIA 079 PHILIPPINE AIRLINES 080 LOT POLISH AIRLINES 081 QANTAS AIRWAYS
    [Show full text]
  • Richter & Associés Inc. Appellant Richter
    [1999] 1 R.C.S. QUEBEC´ c. NOLISAIR INT. (SYNDIC DE) 759 Richter & Associ´es Inc. Appellant Richter & Associ´es inc. Appelante v. c. The Deputy Minister of Revenue of Le sous-ministre du Revenu du Quebec Respondent Qu´ebec Intim´e and et The Attorney General of Canada Mis en Le procureur g´en´eral du Canada Mis en cause cause and between et entre Tremblay & Compagnie, syndics et Tremblay & Compagnie, syndics et gestionnaires lt´ee Appellant gestionnaires lt´ee Appelante v. c. The Deputy Minister of Revenue of Le sous-ministre du Revenu du Quebec Respondent Qu´ebec Intim´e and et The Attorney General of Canada Mis en Le procureur g´en´eral du Canada Mis en cause cause INDEXED AS: QUEBEC (DEPUTY MINISTER OF REVENUE) v. REPERTORI´ E´: QUEBEC´ (SOUS-MINISTRE DU REVENU) c. NOLISAIR INTERNATIONAL INC. (TRUSTEE OF); SECURIT´ E´ NOLISAIR INTERNATIONAL INC. (SYNDIC DE); SECURIT´ E´ SAGLAC (1992) INC. (TRUSTEE OF) v. QUEBEC (DEPUTY SAGLAC (1992) INC. (SYNDIC DE) c. QUEBEC´ (SOUS- MINISTER OF REVENUE) MINISTRE DU REVENU) File No.: 26272. No du greffe: 26272. 1999: April 22; 1999: April 29. 1999: 22 avril; 1999: 29 avril. Present: Lamer C.J. and L’Heureux-Dub´e, Gonthier, Pr´esents: Le juge en chef Lamer et les juges L’Heureux- Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache and Dub´e, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci, Major, Binnie JJ. Bastarache et Binnie. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR EN APPEL DE LA COUR D’APPEL DU QUEBEC´ QUEBEC Bankruptcy — Creditors — Provincial Crown — Faillite — Cr´eanciers — Couronne provinciale — Deductions at source — Deemed trust.
    [Show full text]
  • BEECH D18S/ D18C & RCAF EXPEDITER Mk.3 (Built at Wichita, Kansas Between 1945 and 1957)
    Last updated 10 March 2021 BEECH 18 PRODUCTION LIST Compiled by Geoff Goodall PART 2: BEECH D18S/ D18C & RCAF EXPEDITER Mk.3 (Built at Wichita, Kansas between 1945 and 1957) Beech D18S VH-FIE (A-808) flown by owner Rod Lovell at Mangalore, Victoria in April 1984. Photo by Geoff Goodall The D18S was the first new commercial Beechcraft model at the end of World War II. It began a production run of 1,800 Beech 18 variants for the post-war market (D18S, D18C, E18S, G18S, H18), all built by Beech Aircraft Company at their Wichita Kansas plant. The “S” suffix indicated it was powered by the reliable 450hp P&W Wasp Junior series. The first D18S c/n A-1 was first flown in October 1945 at Beech field, Wichita. On 5 December 1945 the D18S received CAA Approved Type Certificate No.757, the first to be issued to any post-war aircraft. The first delivery of a new model D18S to a customer departed Wichita the following day. From 1947 the D18C model was available as an executive version with more powerful 525hp Continental R-9A radials, also offered as the D18C-T passenger transport approved by CAA for feeder airlines. Beech assigned c/n prefix "A-" to D18S production, and "AA-" to the small number of D18Cs. Total production of the D18S, D18C and Canadian Expediter Mk.3 models was 1,035 aircraft. A-1 D18S NX44592 Beech Aircraft Co, Wichita KS: prototype, ff Wichita 10.45/48 (FAA type certification flight test program until 11.45) NC44592 Beech Aircraft Co, Wichita KS 46/48 (prototype D18S, retained by Beech as demonstrator) N44592 Tobe Foster Productions, Lubbock TX 6.2.48 retired by 3.52 further details see Beech 18 by Parmerter p.184 A-2 D18S NX44593 Beech Aircraft Co, Wichita KS: ff Wichita 11.45 NC44593 reg.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transition to Safety Management Systems (SMS) in Aviation: Is Canada Deregulating Flight Safety?, 81 J
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 81 | Issue 1 Article 3 2002 The rT ansition to Safety Management Systems (SMS) in Aviation: Is Canada Deregulating Flight Safety? Renè David-Cooper Federal Court of Appeal of Canada Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Renè David-Cooper, The Transition to Safety Management Systems (SMS) in Aviation: Is Canada Deregulating Flight Safety?, 81 J. Air L. & Com. 33 (2002) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol81/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. THE TRANSITION TO SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (SMS) IN AVIATION: IS CANADA DEREGULATING FLIGHT SAFETY? RENE´ DAVID-COOPER* ABSTRACT In 2013, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) adopted Annex 19 to the Chicago Convention to implement Safety Management Systems (SMS) for airlines around the world. While most ICAO Member States worldwide are still in the early stages of introducing SMS, Canada became the first and only ICAO country in 2008 to fully implement SMS for all Canadian-registered airlines. This article will highlight the documented shortcomings of SMS in Canada during the implementation of the first ever SMS framework in civil aviation. While air carriers struggled to un- derstand and introduce SMS into their operations, this article will illustrate how Transport Canada (TC) did not have the knowledge or the necessary resources to properly guide airline operators during this transition, how SMS was improperly tai- lored for smaller air carriers, and how the Canadian govern- ment canceled safety inspections around the country, leaving many air carriers partially unregulated.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeox FP)1.0 CANADIAN TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH FORUM Lip LE GROUPE DE RECHERCHES SUR LES TRANSPORTS AU CANADA
    jEOX FP)1.0 CANADIAN TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH FORUM Lip LE GROUPE DE RECHERCHES SUR LES TRANSPORTS AU CANADA 20th ANNUAL MEETING PROCEEDINGS TORONTO, ONTARIO MAY 1985 591 AT THE CROSSROADS - THE FINANCIAL HEALTH OF CANADA'S LEVEL I AIRLINES by R.W. Lake,. J.M. Serafin and A., Mozes Research Branch, Canadian Transport Commission INTRODUCTION In 1981 the Air Transport Committee and the 'Research Branch of the Canadian Transport Commission on a joint basis, and in conjunction with the major Canadian airlines, (who formed a Task Force) undertook a programme of studies concerning airline pricing and financial performance. This paper is based on a CTC Working Paper' which presented current data on the topic, and interpreted them in the context of the financial and regulatory circumstances faced by the airlines as of July 1984. ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE The trends illustrated in Figure 1 suggest that air trans- portation may have reached the stage of a mature industry with air . travel/transport no longer accounting for an increasing proportion of economic activity. This mile/stone in the industry's life cycle, if in fact it has been reached, would suggest that an apparent fall in the income elasticity of demand for air travel between 1981 and 1983 could persist. As data reflecting the apparent demand re- surgence of 1984 become available, the picture may change, but 1 LAKE Figure 2 Figure 1 AIR FARE INDICES AIR TRANSPORT REVENUE AS A PERCENT OF GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT 1.90 1.20.. 1.80. 1.70 - 1.10 -, 1.60. ..... 1.50. .. 8 .: . 1.40 -, r,.
    [Show full text]
  • 363 Part 238—Contracts With
    Immigration and Naturalization Service, Justice § 238.3 (2) The country where the alien was mented on Form I±420. The contracts born; with transportation lines referred to in (3) The country where the alien has a section 238(c) of the Act shall be made residence; or by the Commissioner on behalf of the (4) Any country willing to accept the government and shall be documented alien. on Form I±426. The contracts with (c) Contiguous territory and adjacent transportation lines desiring their pas- islands. Any alien ordered excluded who sengers to be preinspected at places boarded an aircraft or vessel in foreign outside the United States shall be contiguous territory or in any adjacent made by the Commissioner on behalf of island shall be deported to such foreign the government and shall be docu- contiguous territory or adjacent island mented on Form I±425; except that con- if the alien is a native, citizen, subject, tracts for irregularly operated charter or national of such foreign contiguous flights may be entered into by the Ex- territory or adjacent island, or if the ecutive Associate Commissioner for alien has a residence in such foreign Operations or an Immigration Officer contiguous territory or adjacent is- designated by the Executive Associate land. Otherwise, the alien shall be de- Commissioner for Operations and hav- ported, in the first instance, to the ing jurisdiction over the location country in which is located the port at where the inspection will take place. which the alien embarked for such for- [57 FR 59907, Dec. 17, 1992] eign contiguous territory or adjacent island.
    [Show full text]
  • Wings News 05-06 & Collection 2013
    Etihad Airways A330-200 Thai Airways A340-500 Antonov AN-225 Interfl ug Mil Mi-8 Scenix Schiphol Airport WINGS NEWS 05-06 & COLLECTION 2013 02 Inhalt / Content AUS LIEBE ZUM DETAIL DETAILS ARE OUR PASSION Seite / Page Liebe Herpa-Kunden, Sammler und Modellfans, Dear Herpa customers, collectors and model fans, WINGS NEWS 05-06 Herzlichen Glückwunsch: Sie halten die neue Frühjahrs-Collection mit den Herpa- Congratulations on picking up the new Spring Collection – Herpa’s model trends inclu- Neuheiten zur Lieferung im Mai und Juni 2013 Modelltrends in Ihren Händen – mit vielen Neuheiten und neuen Formen bis Juni 2013. ding many new releases and new types for the period up to June 2013. The “biggest” New items to be released in May and June 2013 Das „größte“ Highlight dieser Ausgabe stellt die Antonov AN-225 im Maßstab 1:200 highlight of this issue is the Antonov AN-225 in the 1/200 scale. The original plane is 03-05 ......................................................1/500 dar. Im Original ist der Flieger Rekordhalter für den mit 190 Tonnen schwersten Ein- the record holder for the world’s heaviest individual transport of 190 tons. As a mat- zeltransport der Welt. Auch im Modell mit 442 Millimetern Breite und 427 Millimetern ter of fact, even the 442 millimeter wide and 427 millimeter long model is a little giant Länge ist er ein kleiner Gigant. Ein Transportwunder der Lüfte ist auch die C5-Galaxy. of the skies. Another transport wonder of world aviation is the C5-Galaxy. Indeed, until 06 .................................................1/500 Scenix Bis 1982 war sie das größte Flugzeug der Welt, und auch heute sind viele der ur- 1982 it was the world’s biggest airplane – and even today, many of the 131 sprünglich 131 Maschinen vor allem im militärischen Dienst unterwegs.
    [Show full text]
  • Neilson Vol Portar Esquiadors a L'aeroport D'andorra-La
    L'EINA QUE PERMET COBRAR AL MOMENT www.bsa.ad DIVENDRES, 22 DE JULIOL DEL 2016 NÚM. 3.108 / ANY 13 Neilson vol portar esquiadors a l’aeroport d’Andorra-la Seu ,%&!AkRMAQUEMANTCONTACTESAMBCOMPANYIESINTERESSADESAOPERARDESDAQUESTAINFRAESTRUCTURA AVUI ÉS NOTÍCIA pàgina 3 JONATHAN GIL LdA demana una compareixença del Tribunal de Comptes ANDORRA pàgina 8 El Mercat de Nadal de la capital costarà 360.000 euros ANDORRA pàgina 9 L’Andorra Ultra Trail tindrà una nova prova de 233 quilòmetres ESPORTS pàgina 18 OPINIÓ ANTÒNIA ESCODA TXEMA DÍAZ- El Comú d’Escaldes treballarà per En formació contínua TORRENT Lingüista i professor El dret a la peresa Europa: una canviar tot el paviment que rellisca història de sexe no ANDORRA pàgina 10 consentit Compensació de 77.400 € PizzeriaITALIA - Asador pels talls d’internet de juny da Corrado ANDORRA pàgina 6 7uDJUDGDODSL]]D" 3HUÕODYHULWDEOHSL]]D" Corrado us espera a ITALIA L’únic forn de llenya de la Capital Tel.: (+376) 86 10 88 Prat de la Creu 29 - Andorra La Vella - Principat d’Andorra WWW.BONDIA.AD / TEL. 808 888 / FAX 828 888 DIVENDRES, 22 DE JULIOL DEL 2016 15 Pirineus Sanitat Esports Mateu Huguet, nou gerent de AJUNTAMENT DE SORT l’ICS a Lleida i l’Alt Pirineu Substitueix Jaume Capdevila, que serà director de l’Hospital Arnau de Vilanova AGÈNCIES Agències LLEIDA El ns ara director gerent de la Fundació Sant Hospital de la Seu d’Urgell, el doctor Ma- teu Huguet, va ser nomenat ahir nou gerent de la Gerència %LPIRAG¿ISMEDESL¼LOMCONSISTEIXAFERUNRECORREGUTENAIG¿ESBRAVES Territorial de l’Institut Català de la Salut a Lleida i l’Alt Piri- neu i Aran.
    [Show full text]
  • La Revolución Aérea Española
    INFORMEINFORME La Índicerevolución de aéreaRegulación española: del monopolioFiscal al 2016-2017 liderazgo mundial, Un informe de Tax Foundation divulgado por enForo veinteRegulación Inteligente años regulacioninteligente.org @FRInteligente Foro Regulación Inteligente LA REVOLUCIÓN AÉREA ESPAÑOLA LA REVOLUCIÓN AÉREA ESPAÑOLA Del monopolio al liderazgo mundial, regulacioninteligente.org | @FRInteligente | Foro Regulación Inteligente 2 Del monopolio al liderazgo mundial, regulacioninteligente.org | @FRInteligente | Foro Regulación Inteligente 3 en veinte años en veinte años Índice 1. Introducción 5 2. La revolución aérea 6 3. La Operación Salida 2018 18 4. Efectos macroeconómicos del sector aéreo 22 5. Reformas y regulación inteligente 26 6. Conclusiones 36 LA REVOLUCIÓN AÉREA ESPAÑOLA LA REVOLUCIÓN AÉREA ESPAÑOLA Del monopolio al liderazgo mundial, regulacioninteligente.org | @FRInteligente | Foro Regulación Inteligente 2 Del monopolio al liderazgo mundial, regulacioninteligente.org | @FRInteligente | Foro Regulación Inteligente 3 en veinte años en veinte años LA REVOLUCIÓN AÉREA ESPAÑOLA LA REVOLUCIÓN AÉREA ESPAÑOLA Del monopolio al liderazgo mundial, regulacioninteligente.org | @FRInteligente | Foro Regulación Inteligente 4 Del monopolio al liderazgo mundial, regulacioninteligente.org | @FRInteligente | Foro Regulación Inteligente 5 en veinte años en veinte años 1 INTRODUCCIÓN esarrollar una regulación inteligente es funda- mental para facilitar el crecimiento de los dis- Dtintos sectores económicos. Un marco flexible y abierto permite que las empresas desplieguen un mayor grado de innovación, lo que a su vez genera una carre- ra a la excelencia cuyos principales beneficiarios son los ciudadanos, en forma de mejores servicios y precios más atractivos. Un buen ejemplo de los beneficios sociales y económicos derivados de mejorar el marco regulatorio es el sector aé- reo. En los próximos días, coincidiendo con la Operación Salida, millones de personas pasarán por los aeropuertos españoles para iniciar sus vacaciones.
    [Show full text]