July 2016 Welcome New Faculty
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Karl Jordan Medal Award 1980 to KEITH S. BROWN, JR
No.4 July/Aug 1980 of the LEPIDOPTERISTS' S<:X:IETY Dave Winter, Editor 257 Common Street Dedham, MA 02026 USA ====================================================================================== ASSOCIATE EDITORS ART: Les Sielski RIPPLES: Jo Brewer ZONE COORDINATORS 1 Robert Langston 8 Kenelm Philip 2 Jon Shepard 5 Mo Nielsen 9 Eduardo Welling M. 3 Ray Stanford 6 Dave Baggett interim 10 Paul Opler 4 Hugh Freeman 7 Dave Winter 11 Quimby Hess ====================================================================================== Karl Jordan Medal Award 1980 to KEITH S. BROWN, JR. Keith S. Brown, Jr., born Oc tober 1, 1938, Chicago, Ill.; mar ried, Kay Fowell, 1962; four children, two girls and two boys. Education: California Institute of Technology, B. S., Chemistry, 1959; University of Wisconsin, Ph.D., Organic/Pharmaceutical! Biochemistry, 1962; Stanford University, Post-Doctoral, 1963; Cornell University, Sabbatical, 1979-1980. Member and held office in numerous professional and honor societies: American Chemical Society, Chemical Society (London), Society for Tropical Biology, Society of Systematic Zoology, Soc. Brasiliera Ent., Sigma Xi, Fellow, Royal Entomological Society, London, and Lepidopterists' Society (Vice-President, 1972, 1980-81; edit com. Journal, 1972 . date). Dr. Brown has had varied professional experience including biochemical research with Merck, Sharp & Dohme in 1959. He and his family moved to Brasil following postdoctoral work where he served as professor of graduate courses in natural products chemistry at the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 1964-1973. Dr. Brown is currently a professor of animal ecology, biosystematics and chemical ecology at the Universidade Estadual de Campinas in Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brasil. With well over 80 research papers and two books published, Dr. Brown's work in chemical ecology, ecological genetics, biogeography and conservation is well known. -
CHECKLIST of WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea)
WISCONSIN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 6 JUNE 2018 CHECKLIST OF WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea) Leslie A. Ferge,1 George J. Balogh2 and Kyle E. Johnson3 ABSTRACT A total of 1284 species representing the thirteen families comprising the present checklist have been documented in Wisconsin, including 293 species of Geometridae, 252 species of Erebidae and 584 species of Noctuidae. Distributions are summarized using the six major natural divisions of Wisconsin; adult flight periods and statuses within the state are also reported. Examples of Wisconsin’s diverse native habitat types in each of the natural divisions have been systematically inventoried, and species associated with specialized habitats such as peatland, prairie, barrens and dunes are listed. INTRODUCTION This list is an updated version of the Wisconsin moth checklist by Ferge & Balogh (2000). A considerable amount of new information from has been accumulated in the 18 years since that initial publication. Over sixty species have been added, bringing the total to 1284 in the thirteen families comprising this checklist. These families are estimated to comprise approximately one-half of the state’s total moth fauna. Historical records of Wisconsin moths are relatively meager. Checklists including Wisconsin moths were compiled by Hoy (1883), Rauterberg (1900), Fernekes (1906) and Muttkowski (1907). Hoy's list was restricted to Racine County, the others to Milwaukee County. Records from these publications are of historical interest, but unfortunately few verifiable voucher specimens exist. Unverifiable identifications and minimal label data associated with older museum specimens limit the usefulness of this information. Covell (1970) compiled records of 222 Geometridae species, based on his examination of specimens representing at least 30 counties. -
Influence of Habitat and Bat Activity on Moth Community Composition and Seasonal Phenology Across Habitat Types
INFLUENCE OF HABITAT AND BAT ACTIVITY ON MOTH COMMUNITY COMPOSITION AND SEASONAL PHENOLOGY ACROSS HABITAT TYPES BY MATTHEW SAFFORD THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Entomology in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2018 Urbana, Illinois Advisor: Assistant Professor Alexandra Harmon-Threatt, Chair and Director of Research ABSTRACT Understanding the factors that influence moth diversity and abundance is important for monitoring moth biodiversity and developing conservation strategies. Studies of moth habitat use have primarily focused on access to host plants used by specific moth species. How vegetation structure influences moth communities within and between habitats and mediates the activity of insectivorous bats is understudied. Previous research into the impact of bat activity on moths has primarily focused on interactions in a single habitat type or a single moth species of interest, leaving a large knowledge gap on how habitat structure and bat activity influence the composition of moth communities across habitat types. I conducted monthly surveys at sites in two habitat types, restoration prairie and forest. Moths were collected using black light bucket traps and identified to species. Bat echolocation calls were recorded using ultrasonic detectors and classified into phonic groups to understand how moth community responds to the presence of these predators. Plant diversity and habitat structure variables, including tree diameter at breast height, ground cover, and vegetation height were measured during summer surveys to document how differences in habitat structure between and within habitats influences moth diversity. I found that moth communities vary significantly between habitat types. -
Taxonomic Chauvinism Threatens the Future of Entomology
Taxonomic chauvinism threatens the future of entomology Simon R Leather ntomologists are like endangered Biological Conservation, showed that 69% mammals such as tigers and polar of the papers published over a 15-year pe- Imperial College Ebears in that they and their habi- riod focused on vertebrates with only 11% London, UK tats are on the verge of extinction (Leather, on insects, compared with a global diver- 2007) and this is likely to have a profound sity estimate of 3% and 79% respectively! negative effect on science in general. It seemed appropriate to further ex- I have identified three potential threats amine the publishing bias, so I searched to Entomology in Britain – taxonomic bias, the contents of four prestigious ecologi- Title image: funding bias (possibly fuelled by journal cal journals for 2006 and 2007, covering Unidentified impact factors) and lack of formal training. the UK, mainland Europe and the USA Neuroptera found in It has been recognised for some time that – Journal of Animal Ecology, Journal of mountain rainforests taxonomic bias within vertebrate research Applied Ecology, Oecologia and Ecology of Ecuador, one is widespread, and skewed towards birds – assigning each paper to either verte- of the most diverse terrestrial ecosystem. and mammals (e.g. Bonnet et al, 2002). brate, invertebrate (further sub-dividing (Photo: Maurice Clark and May (2002), examining the pa- into insect) and plants. Those papers that Leponce) pers published in Conservation Biology and truly took a cross-taxonomic approach I 10 Biologist | Volume 56 Number 1, February 2009 In my view | IOB classified as mixed, while those that had, for example, some elements of a cross-tax- onomy approach, I classified according to the research interests of the principal in- vestigator and the originating laboratory. -
Reptiles and Amphibians
A good book for beginners is Himmelman’s (2002) book “Discovering Moths’. Winter Moths (2000) describes several methods for By Dennis Skadsen capturing and observing moths including the use of light traps and sugar baits. There are Unlike butterflies, very little fieldwork has a few other essential books listed in the been completed to determine species suggested references section located on composition and distribution of moths in pages 8 & 9. Many moth identification northeast South Dakota. This is partly due guides can now be found on the internet, the to the fact moths are harder to capture and North Dakota and Iowa sites are the most study because most adults are nocturnal, and useful for our area. Since we often identification to species is difficult in the encounter the caterpillars of moths more field. Many adults can only be often than adults, having a guide like differentiated by studying specimens in the Wagners (2005) is essential. hand with a good understanding of moth taxonomy. Listed below are just a few of the species that probably occur in northeast South Although behavior and several physiological Dakota. The list is compiled from the characteristics separate moths from author’s personnel collection, and specimens butterflies including flight periods (moths collected by Gary Marrone or listed in Opler are mainly nocturnal (night) and butterflies (2006). Common and scientific names diurnal (day)); the shapes of antennae and follow Moths of North Dakota (2007) or wings; each have similar life histories. Both Opler (2006). moths and butterflies complete a series of changes from egg to adult called metamorphosis. -
Ts Denver Museum of Nature & Science Reports
DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE REPORTS DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE REPORTS DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE & SCIENCE OF NATURE DENVER MUSEUM NUMBER 16, OCTOBER 11, 2019 SCIENCE.DMNS.ORG/MUSEUM-PUBLICATIONS Denver Museum of Nature & Science Reports 2001 Colorado Boulevard (Print) ISSN 2374-7730 Denver, CO 80205, U.S.A. Denver Museum of Nature & Science Reports (Online) ISSN 2374-7749 REPORTS • NUMBER 16 • OCTOBER 11, 2019 • NUMBER 16 OCTOBER Cover photo: Oreas Anglewing (Polygonia oreas nigrozephyrus Scott, 1984), Gregory Canyon, Boulder County, Colorado, USA, 2 October 1973, leg. Michael G. Pogue. Photo: Bob Livingston. The Denver Museum of Nature & Science Reports (ISSN Frank Krell, PhD, Editor and Production 2374-7730 [print], ISSN 2374-7749 [online]) is an open- access, non peer-reviewed scientifi c journal publishing papers about DMNS research, collections, or other Program and Abstracts Museum related topics, generally authored or co-authored 30th Annual Meeting by Museum staff or associates. Peer review will only be arranged on request of the authors. of the High Country Lepidopterists October 11–12, 2019 The journal is available online at science.dmns.org/ Museum-Publications free of charge. Paper copies Denver Museum of Nature & Science are available for purchase from our print-on-demand publisher Lulu (www.lulu.com). DMNS owns the copyright of the works published in the Reports, which are Frank-Thorsten Krell (Ed.) published under the Creative Commons Attribution Non- Commercial license. For commercial use of published -
Two Large Tropical Moths (Thynartia Zenobia (Noctuidae) and Cocytiuns
VOLUME 53, NUMBER 3 129 VALLEE, G. & R. BEIQUE. 1979. Degilts d'une bepiaJe et Satyridae) and Burnet moths (Zygaena, Zygaenidae) from susceptihilite des peupliers. Phytoprotection 60:23- 30. temperate environments. In H.V Danks (ed.), Insect life-cycle WAGNER, D. L. & J. ROSOVSKY 1991. Mating systems in primitive polymorphism. Theory, evolution and ecological consequences Lepidopte ra, with emphasis on the reproductive behaviour of for seasonality and diapause control. Kluwer Academic Korscheltellus gracilis (Hepialidae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands. 378 pp. 102:277- 303. WAGNER, D. L., D. R. TOB!, B. L. PARKER, W. E. WALLNER & J. G. B. CHRISTIAN SCHMIDT, 208 - 10422 78 Ave., Edmonton, Alberta, LEONARD. 1989. Immature stages and natural enemies of CANADA T6E lP2, DAVlD D. LAWRIE , .301 - 10556 84 Ave., Korscheltellus gracilis (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae). Ann. Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA T6E 2H4. Entomol. Soc. Am. 82:717-724. WINN, A. F. 1909. The Hepialidae, or Ghost-moths. Can. Entomol. Received for publication 5 April 1999; revised and accepted 9 41:189-193. December 1999. WU'KI NG, W. & c. MENGELKOCH. 1994. Control of alternate-year flight activities in high-alpine Ringlet butterflies (Erebia, journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 53(3 ), 1999, 129- 130 TWO LARGE TROPICAL MOTHS (THYSANIA ZENOBIA (NOCTUIDAE) AND COCYTlUS ANTAEUS (SPHINGIDAE)) COLONIZE THE GALAPAGOS ISLANDS Additional key words: light traps, island colonization. The arrival and establishment of a species OIl an isolated oceanic (kerosene lamps) and collections made by amateur entomologists. island is a relatively rare event. The likelihood of colonization Recently (1989 and 1992), Bernard Landry carried out an intensive depends on a variety of fcatures of the species, including dispersal Lepidoptera survey on the islands but he never collected the species ability, availability of food (hostplants or prey) and ability to (Landry pers. -
The Fruit-Piercing Moths of the Genus Gonodonta Hubner
a~ 1~'I1:.§. I~ jml_ ",,'2.5 1.0 :; "III~ "'" 2.5 ~ OOj~ 2.2 :; 2.2 ~ II ~III~ I L:.; I~ L:.; ~i~ &:.:l &:., :;.: e~ :;- I~ 1.1 &;JLU"" ".. L:. .:. ...." III 1.1 ..... 25 ""'1.25 ""11.4 111111.6 ""'1 "1111..4 111111.6 MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART MICHOCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAL BUREAU Of SIANO.\ROS 196.3·A NATIONAL BUREAU or STANDAflDS·I96.l.A THE FRUIT-PIERCINBMOTHS,DF .. THEBENUS GONODONTAHUe:NER (LEPIDOPTERA, NOCTUIDAE) By E. L.TODD TECHNICAL BULLETIN NO. 1201 AGRICULTURAL RESF.ARCH SERVICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUL TURE \Vashington, D. C. Issued July 1959 CONTENTS Palee Gonodonta Hubner ______________ .___________________________________ 1 Nomenclatorial remarks _________ .___________________________________ a Distribution _______________________________________________________ 4 Biology and economic importance _____________________________________ 5 Key to the species _______ ---_________________________________________ 7 The species of Gonodlmta ________ ____________________________________ 11 Unrecognized species _______________________________________________ 50 Literature cited _____________________________________________________ 50 Index to the species and subspecil~s "-__________________________________ 52 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author expresses his appreciation the opportunity of studying specimens to the curators and the lepidopterists of from their private collections. He is the following institutions for lending especially grateful to D. S. Fletcher of him specime!'ts: American Museum of the Bdtish Museum (Natural History) Natural History, New York, N. Y.; and F. Fernandez Yepez of the Uni British :r.ruseum (Natural History), versidad Central de Venezuela. Mr. London, England.; Carnegie Museum, Fletcher provided much information Pittsburgh, Pa.; Cornell University, concerning types and made many com • Ithaca, N. Y.; Division de Entomologia, parisons of specimens sent to him with Ministerio de Agricultura y Cria, the types in the British Museum. -
2001 Contents
Carol Sellers, 118 Airdric Road, Toronto, Ontario, 1\'14G 11\'15 NSECTS THE NEWSJOURNAL OF THE TORONTO ENTOMOLOGISTS' ASSOCIATION VOLUME 6, NUMBER 2 JANUARY 2001 Contents Notes From The Editors' Desks 25 Entomophilia by Carolyn King 26 Announcements 26 Upcoming Meetings 27 Late Season Insect Sightings 2000 28 2000 Meeting Reports by Nancy van der Poorten 30 Results ofthe 2000 Presqu'ile Butterfly Count by Philip Careless 32 Notes on Nest Cavity Excavation by a Sphecid Wasp by William Mcilveen 34 Results ofthe Algonquin Odonate Counts 1999 & 2000 by Colin Jones 37 Monarch Notes by Don Davis and Carolyn King ..40 2000 Field Trip Reports by Nancy van der Poorten : .42 Flea Market(Classifieds) Inside BackCover In the Next Issue Inside Back Cover Front Cover illustration: T Shirt Contest Winning Entry by Pamela Meacher Issue Date: January 20, 2001 ISSN: 1203-3995 Members Please Note: The deadline for submissions to the May 2001 issue of Ontario Insects is March 1. Late submissions may be added at the discretion of the Editor after that date. If there are any questions or concerns regarding submissions, please feel free to contact the NEW EDITOR, Colin Jones: Box 182, Lakefield, ON, KOL 2HO, Tel (home): 705-652-5004, Tel (work): 705 755-2166, email: [email protected] Please remember when submitting electronic information to minimize format ting and send documents as plain text wherever possible. Ontario Insects Notes from the up-and-coming editor: Greetings fellow TEA members! As the Natural Resources, Peterborough. I live regular contributors to 01 in the past, I up-and-coming editor of Ontario in Lakefield (just north of Peterborough) look forward to working with you in the Insects, I thought that I would take this with my wife, Marianne and my two future. -
Population and Community Responses Along Envi- Ronmental Gradients Across Spatio-Temporal Scales
Population and community responses along envi- ronmental gradients across spatio-temporal scales Dissertation von Nicolas Alexander Konstantin Frieß Philipps-Universität Marburg März 2019 Population and community responses along environ- mental gradients across spatio-temporal scales Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) dem Fachbereich Biologie der Philipps-Universität Marburg vorgelegt von Nicolas Alexander Konstantin Frieß aus Frankfurt am Main Marburg an der Lahn, März 2019 Vom Fachbereich Biologie der Philipps-Universität Marburg als Dissertation am 17.05.2019 angenommen. Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Roland Brandl Zweitgutachterin: Prof. Dr. Nina Farwig Tag der mündlichen Prüfung am 27.06.2019 Table of Contents Table of Contents Summary ............................................................................................................................................................. iv Zusammenfassung ............................................................................................................................................. vi Chapter 1 General Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Ecological organization and processes ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Aim of the thesis ................................................................................................................................................................................. -
The Lepidoptera Families and Associated Orders of British Columbia
The Lepidoptera Families and Associated Orders of British Columbia The Lepidoptera Families and Associated Orders of British Columbia G.G.E. Scudder and R.A. Cannings March 31, 2007 G.G.E. Scudder and R.A. Cannings Printed 04/25/07 The Lepidoptera Families and Associated Orders of British Columbia 1 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................5 Order MEGALOPTERA (Dobsonflies and Alderflies) (Figs. 1 & 2)...........................................6 Description of Families of MEGALOPTERA .............................................................................6 Family Corydalidae (Dobsonflies or Fishflies) (Fig. 1)................................................................6 Family Sialidae (Alderflies) (Fig. 2)............................................................................................7 Order RAPHIDIOPTERA (Snakeflies) (Figs. 3 & 4) ..................................................................9 Description of Families of RAPHIDIOPTERA ...........................................................................9 Family Inocelliidae (Inocelliid snakeflies) (Fig. 3) ......................................................................9 Family Raphidiidae (Raphidiid snakeflies) (Fig. 4) ...................................................................10 Order NEUROPTERA (Lacewings and Ant-lions) (Figs. 5-16).................................................11 Description of Families of NEUROPTERA ..............................................................................12 -
The Largest Known Odonate in China: Hsiufua Chaoi Zhang Et Wang, Gen
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Springer - Publisher Connector Article Geology May 2013 Vol.58 No.13: 15791584 doi: 10.1007/s11434-012-5567-3 The largest known odonate in China: Hsiufua chaoi Zhang et Wang, gen. et sp. nov. from the Middle Jurassic of Inner Mongolia ZHANG HaiChun1*, ZHENG DaRan1,2, WANG Bo1, FANG Yan1 & JARZEMBOWSKI Edmund A1 1 State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China; 2 Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China Received June 26, 2012; accepted October 19, 2012; published online November 27, 2012 A new genus and species, Hsiufua chaoi Zhang et Wang, is established based on a forewing from the Middle Jurassic Haifanggou Formation in Inner Mongolia, China and attributed to Campterophlebiidae, Isophlebioidea, Odonata. It is the largest odonate known in China and the fourth in the world in terms of forewing length. The maximum size (based on forewing length) of Odonata is smaller in the Permian than in the Mesozoic which is probably due to competition for prey between Odonata and Pro- todonata in the Permian. The reason that the maximum size of Jurassic odonates is larger than that of their extant relatives is most probably less competition and lower predation pressure from contemporary aerial vertebrates. Hsiufua chaoi Zhang et Wang, new genus and species, largest odonate, Middle Jurassic, China Citation: Zhang H C, Zheng D R, Wang B, et al. The largest known odonate in China: Hsiufua chaoi Zhang et Wang, gen.