Materia Medica Vegetabilis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Materia Medica Vegetabilis L A T I N I N D E X L A T IJ N S E I N D E X LATEINISCHES INHALTSVERZEICHNIS INDEX LATIN Abelmoschus esculentus ................................................692 Aegle Marmelos ............................................... 205 Abelmoschus moschatus ....................................................1 Aegopodium podagraria..................................... 36 Abies alba ...........................................................................2 Aesculus glabra .................................................. 37 “ “...........................................................................1370 Aesculus Hippocastanum................................. 698 “ “...........................................................................1372 “ “.................................................................. 699 Abies nigra....................................................................1041 “ “.................................................................. 700 Abies sibirica ......................................................................3 “ “.................................................................. 701 Abies spec.......................................................................276 Aethusa Cynapium............................................ 38 Abrotani (Herba) ................................................................7 Aframomum Melegueta................................ 1003 Abrotani montani (Flores)............................................1242 Agar-Agar.......................................................... 39 Abrus precatorius................................................................4 Agaricus............................................................. 40 “ “..................................................................................5 Agaricus albus................................................. 787 “ “..................................................................................6 Agaricus emeticus ............................................. 41 Absinthii (Oleum)...............................................................8 Agaricus muscaria............................................. 40 Absinthii (Summi tates) .....................................................9 Agave americana............................................... 42 Absinthii alpini (Herba) ...................................................10 Agni casti (Fructus)........................................... 43 Absinthii vulgaris (Herba)................................................11 Agrimonia eupatoria.......................................... 44 Acacia bambolah ............................................................189 Agropyrum repens........................................... 648 Acacia Catechu...............................................................325 Agrostemma githago......................................... 45 Acacia Farnesiana ............................................................13 “ “................................................................... 46 Acacia spec.......................................................................12 Ailanthus glandulosa......................................... 47 “ “ ...............................................................................130 Ajovae (Fructus)................................................ 48 Acacia Suma...................................................................325 Ajovani (Semen) ................................................ 48 Acaciae (Gummi) ...........................................................130 Ajuga Chamaepitys ............................................ 49 Acaciae Bambolah (Fructus)..........................................189 Ajuga reptans...................................................... 50 Acaciae Verus (Flores).....................................................13 Alchemilla alpina ............................................... 52 Acalypha indica................................................................14 Alchemilla arvensis............................................ 53 Acanthus mollis................................................................16 Alchemilla vulgaris ............................................ 54 Acaroidis (Gummi)...........................................................15 “ “.................................................................... 55 Acer negundo....................................................................18 Alcornoco (Cortex) ............................................ 56 Acer Pseudo-platanus.......................................................19 Aletris farinose ................................................... 57 Acer rubrum......................................................................20 Alisma Plantago ................................................. 58 Acer saccharinum .............................................................17 “ “.................................................................... 59 Achillea Millefolium ......................................................904 Alkanna tinctoria................................................ 60 “ “...............................................................................905 Alkekengi (Fructus) ........................................... 61 Achillea moschata ............................................................21 Alliaria officinalis .............................................. 62 “ “ .................................................................................22 Allium ascolonicum ........................................... 63 “ “ .................................................................................23 Allium Cepa ....................................................... 64 Achillea nobilis...............................................................906 Allium porrum.................................................... 65 Achillea ptarmica..........................................................1118 Allium sativum................................................... 66 “ “ .............................................................................1119 Allium schoenoprasum ...................................... 67 Achras Zapota...............................................................1247 Allium ursinum .................................................. 68 “ “ .............................................................................1248 Allium victorialis. .......................................... 1445 Acocanthera abyssinica....................................................24 Alnus glutinosa................................................... 69 Aconitum anthora .............................................................26 “ “.................................................................... 70 Aconitum heterophyllum..................................................27 Alnus incana....................................................... 70 Aconitum Lycoctonum.....................................................28 Alnus rubra......................................................... 71 Aconitum Napellus...........................................................25 Alnus serrulata ................................................... 71 “ “..................................................................................29 Aloe..................................................................... 72 Acorus Calamus..............................................................257 Aloysia citriodora........................................... 1436 “ “................................................................................258 Alpinia galanga ................................................ 602 Actaea racemosa.............................................................379 Alpinia officinarum.......................................... 603 Actaea spicata...................................................................30 Alsidium Helminthochorton ............................ 684 “ “..................................................................................31 Alstonia constricta.............................................. 73 Adhatoda vasica ...............................................................32 Alstonia scholaris............................................... 74 Adianti aurei (Herba)........................................................33 Althaea officinalis .............................................. 75 Adiantum capillus Veneris.............................................287 “ “.................................................................... 76 Adiantum pedatum .........................................................286 “ “ ................................................................... 77 Adonis vernalis.................................................................34 Althaea rosea .................................................... 860 Althaea rosea ................................................................. 861 Angelica Archangelica Alypi (Folia) .....................................................................78 officinalis............. 107 Alyxia stellata...................................................................79 idem ............. 108 Amanita mucaria ..............................................................40 idem……....109 Amaranthus hypochondriacus..........................................80 Angosturae (Cortex)......................................... 110 Ammi major......................................................................81
Recommended publications
  • Plants of Southeastern Polynesia. 3
    Plants of Southeastern Polynesia. 3. F. R. FoSBERG1 and M.-H. SACHET1 Abstract In this paper are presented critical notes and records of species of Ophioglossum (Ophi­ oglossaceae), Waltheria (Sterculiaceae), Alyxia (Apocynaceae) and Morinda (Rubiaceae), a new varietal combination and two new varieties in Alyxia stellata, and a discussion of the generic separation of Ochrosia and Neiosperma (Apocynaceae). Ophioglossum pendulum var. falcatum (Presl) Fosberg, 0cc. Pap. Bishop Mus. 23 :29, 1962. 0. pendulum L. f. var. pendulum is common at low and moderate elevations in Tahiti. A collection from 1100 m elevation, south of Orohena, MacDaniels 1533 (US) is perfectly typical var. falcatum, apparently the first record of this variety from the Society Islands and from southern Polynesia. It is by far the commoner form in the Hawaiian Islands. The typical form, var. pendulum, with long pendant sterile parts of the fronds is common in Tahiti but very rare in Hawaii. Waltheria tomentosa (J. R. & G. Forst.) St. John, Nat. Can. 98:573, 1971.2 Lophanthus tomentosus J. R. & G. Forst., Char. Gen. 14, 1775; 28, pl. 14, 1776. Waltheria lophanthus Forst. f., Prodr. 47, 1786. It is surprising that no one had made this transfer. Of course, the application of the " Kew Rule" would have made it inappropriate prior to the formulation of the modern International Rules of Botanical Nomenclature at the Vienna Congress in 1905. However, there seems to be no reason for not now taking up the oldest available epithet for this plant. This species is still to be found on the dry sides of most of the Marquesas and on the smaller, low dry islands of the group.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Origin of Tetraploid Vernal Grasses (Anthoxanthum) in Europe
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article On the Origin of Tetraploid Vernal Grasses (Anthoxanthum) in Europe Zuzana Chumová 1,2,* , Terezie Mandáková 3,4 and Pavel Trávníˇcek 1 1 Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, CZ-242 53 Pr ˚uhonice,Czech Republic; [email protected] 2 Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, CZ-128 00 Prague, Czech Republic 3 CEITEC, Masaryk University, CZ-625 00 Brno, Czech Republic; [email protected] 4 Department of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, CZ-625 00 Brno, Czech Republic * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Polyploidy has played a crucial role in the evolution of many plant taxa, namely in higher latitudinal zones. Surprisingly, after several decades of an intensive research on polyploids, there are still common polyploid species whose evolutionary history is virtually unknown. Here, we addressed the origin of sweet vernal grass (Anthoxanthum odoratum) using flow cytometry, DNA sequencing, and in situ hybridization-based cytogenetic techniques. An allotetraploid and polytopic origin of the species has been verified. The chromosome study reveals an extensive variation between the European populations. In contrast, an autopolyploid origin of the rarer tetraploid vernal grass species, A. alpinum, has been corroborated. Diploid A. alpinum played an essential role in the polyploidization of both European tetraploids studied. Keywords: FISH; flow cytometry; GBSSI; genome size; GISH; Poaceae; polyploidy Citation: Chumová, Z.; Mandáková, T.; Trávníˇcek,P. On the Origin of Tetraploid Vernal Grasses 1. Introduction (Anthoxanthum) in Europe. Genes Anthoxanthum L., the vernal grass, is a genus of the family Poaceae, comprising annual 2021, 12, 966.
    [Show full text]
  • HAWAII and SOUTH PACIFIC ISLANDS REGION - 2016 NWPL FINAL RATINGS U.S
    HAWAII and SOUTH PACIFIC ISLANDS REGION - 2016 NWPL FINAL RATINGS U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, COLD REGIONS RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY (CRREL) - 2013 Ratings Lichvar, R.W. 2016. The National Wetland Plant List: 2016 wetland ratings. User Notes: 1) Plant species not listed are considered UPL for wetland delineation purposes. 2) A few UPL species are listed because they are rated FACU or wetter in at least one Corps region. Scientific Name Common Name Hawaii Status South Pacific Agrostis canina FACU Velvet Bent Islands Status Agrostis capillaris UPL Colonial Bent Abelmoschus moschatus FAC Musk Okra Agrostis exarata FACW Spiked Bent Abildgaardia ovata FACW Flat-Spike Sedge Agrostis hyemalis FAC Winter Bent Abrus precatorius FAC UPL Rosary-Pea Agrostis sandwicensis FACU Hawaii Bent Abutilon auritum FACU Asian Agrostis stolonifera FACU Spreading Bent Indian-Mallow Ailanthus altissima FACU Tree-of-Heaven Abutilon indicum FAC FACU Monkeybush Aira caryophyllea FACU Common Acacia confusa FACU Small Philippine Silver-Hair Grass Wattle Albizia lebbeck FACU Woman's-Tongue Acaena exigua OBL Liliwai Aleurites moluccanus FACU Indian-Walnut Acalypha amentacea FACU Alocasia cucullata FACU Chinese Taro Match-Me-If-You-Can Alocasia macrorrhizos FAC Giant Taro Acalypha poiretii UPL Poiret's Alpinia purpurata FACU Red-Ginger Copperleaf Alpinia zerumbet FACU Shellplant Acanthocereus tetragonus UPL Triangle Cactus Alternanthera ficoidea FACU Sanguinaria Achillea millefolium UPL Common Yarrow Alternanthera sessilis FAC FACW Sessile Joyweed Achyranthes
    [Show full text]
  • Spirit Germplasm Selected Class Sweetgrass Spirit Germplasm Is a Selected Class, Regions of North America
    Spirit Germplasm Selected Class Sweetgrass Spirit germplasm is a selected class, regions of North America. It is con- vegetative release of sweetgrass Hiero- sidered a facultative wetland species chloe odorata (L.) Beauv. The vegetative in the lower 48 states, a facultative propagules were originally collected in upland species in Alaska, and is listed 1991 in the Sweetgrass Hills of Toole as an endangered species in Maryland, County, Montana. The site elevation is North Carolina, and Pennsylvania. Approximate area 3,700 ft. (1,128 m), soil texture is silty of adaptation for Sweetgrass is a very early flowering, clay loam, and annual precipitation is 15 Spirit Germplasm mid-seral species that grows in mixed to 19 in. (382 to 485 mm). This release Sweetgrass plant communities of wet meadows was tested at the Bridger PMC in com- and in the transition zones of low, moist parison to ‘Radora,' a commercial release from South Dakota, communities along streams and rivers. It survives under a fairly and collections from Colorado, Kansas, Michigan, Montana, wide range of environmental conditions and prefers medium- to and North Dakota. It was found to be superior in survival, num- coarse-textured soils with 20% to 30% soil moisture content, a ber of tillers produced, spread rate, leaf length, and biomass depth to water table of 6 to 11 in. (14 to 28 cm), mostly full light production. The accepted propagation method of this species conditions, and grows best with limited competition from other is asexual (vegetative), as it has very poor seed set. species. In Montana, it has been found at elevations as low as 3,600 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaiian Santalum Species (Sandalwood)
    April 2006 Species Profiles for Pacific Island Agroforestry ver. 4.1 www.traditionaltree.org Santalum ellipticum, S. freycinetianum, S. haleakalae, and S. paniculatum (Hawaiian sandalwood) Santalaceae (sandalwood family) ‘iliahialo‘e (S. ellipticum) ‘iliahi, ‘a‘ahi, ‘aoa, lā‘au ‘ala, wahie ‘ala (S. freycinetianum, S. haleakalae, and S. paniculatum) Mark D. Merlin, Lex A.J. Thomson, and Craig R. Elevitch IN BRIEF Distribution Hawaiian Islands, varies by species. Size Small shrubs or trees, typically 5–10 m photo: M. Merlin M. photo: (16–33 ft) or larger at maturity. Habitat Varies by species; typically xeric, sub­ humid, or humid tropics with a distinct dry season of 3–5 months. Vegetation Open, drier forests and wood­ lands. Soils All species require light to medium, well drained soils. Growth rate Slow to moderate, 0.3–0.7 m/yr (1–2.3 ft/yr). Main agroforestry uses Homegardens, mixed­ species forestry. Main uses Heartwood for crafts, essential oil extraction. Yields Heartwood in 30+ years. Intercropping Because sandalwood is para­ sitic and requires one or more host plants, intercropping is not only possible but neces­ sary. Santalum freycinetianum var. Invasive potential Sandalwood has a capac­ lanaiense, rare, nearly extinct. ity for invasiveness in disturbed areas, but this Photo taken near summit of is rarely considered a problem. Lāna‘ihale, Lāna‘i in 1978. INTRODUCTION SANDALWOOD TERMS Hawaiian sandalwood species are small trees that occur naturally in open, drier forest and woodland communities. Hemi-parasitic Describes a plant that photosynthe­ They are typically multi­stemmed and somewhat bushy, at­ sizes but derives water and some nutrients through at­ taining a height of 5–10 m (16–33 ft) or larger at maturity, taching to roots of other species.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollen Morphology of Poaceae (Poales) in the Azores, Portugal
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/283696832 Pollen morphology of Poaceae (Poales) in the Azores, Portugal ARTICLE in GRANA · OCTOBER 2015 Impact Factor: 1.06 · DOI: 10.1080/00173134.2015.1096301 READS 33 4 AUTHORS, INCLUDING: Vania Gonçalves-Esteves Maria A. Ventura Federal University of Rio de Janeiro University of the Azores 86 PUBLICATIONS 141 CITATIONS 43 PUBLICATIONS 44 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, Available from: Maria A. Ventura letting you access and read them immediately. Retrieved on: 10 December 2015 Grana ISSN: 0017-3134 (Print) 1651-2049 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/sgra20 Pollen morphology of Poaceae (Poales) in the Azores, Portugal Leila Nunes Morgado, Vania Gonçalves-Esteves, Roberto Resendes & Maria Anunciação Mateus Ventura To cite this article: Leila Nunes Morgado, Vania Gonçalves-Esteves, Roberto Resendes & Maria Anunciação Mateus Ventura (2015) Pollen morphology of Poaceae (Poales) in the Azores, Portugal, Grana, 54:4, 282-293, DOI: 10.1080/00173134.2015.1096301 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00173134.2015.1096301 Published online: 04 Nov 2015. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 13 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=sgra20 Download by: [b-on: Biblioteca do conhecimento
    [Show full text]
  • Tav7 10 Coumarinderivatives.Pdf
    188 COUMARIN DERIVATIVES Definition [adapted from Lewis’ Dictionary of Toxicology 1998] Coumarin: A very toxic white crystalline substance (C9H6O2) with an odour or new-mown hay, occurring naturally in many plants, especially in the seed or seed coat (testa) where it inhibits germination until removed or destroyed e.g. by photolysis. Reference: Lake BG (1999) Coumarin metabolism, toxicity and carcinogenicity: relevance for human risk assessment. Fd. Chem. Toxicol. 37:423-453. Murray RDH, Méndez J, Brown SA (1982) The Natural Coumarins. Occurrence, Chemistry and Biochemistry. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester. Dihydroxycoumarin (dicoumarol) Core data Syndrome names: sweet clover poisoning Common sources: mouldy hays/silage of • Melilotus spp. (sweet clovers) • Anthoxanthum odoratum (sweet vernal grass) Animals affected: cattle, sheep, horses, deer Mode of action: Fungi convert coumarol in the plants to dicoumarol, an analogue of vitamin K, thus interfering with synthesis of coagulation factors VII, IX, X & prothrombin Poisoning circumstances: feeding mouldy hays or silage of coumarol-containing plants Main effects: widespread haemorrhage Diagnosis: dicoumarol assay (serum, feed) Therapy: vitamin K1 (transfusion if anaemia profound) Prevention: avoid conditions leading to mould growth when harvesting source plants Syndrome name(s): • sweet clover poisoning • ferulosis Plant sources: - mouldy hays/silage of Melilotus spp. (sweet clovers) [Family Fabaceae] Melilotus alba (white sweet clover) – major source of dihydroxycoumarin toxicity of cattle in North America; occurs in Australia, but only 1 case is on record in Australia (Wignall et al. 1961). Melilotus indica (Hexam scent) - occurs in Australia, but no cases of dihydroxycoumarin poisoning attributed to it are on record here. - mouldy hay or silage of Anthoxanthum odoratum (sweet vernal grass) [Family Poaceae] [Davies & Ashton 1964, Cranwell 1983, Pritchard et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Unassisted Invasions: Understanding and Responding to Australia's High
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Australian Journal of Botany, 2017, 65, 678–690 Turner Review No. 21 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT17152 Unassisted invasions: understanding and responding to Australia’s high-impact environmental grass weeds Rieks D. van Klinken A,C and Margaret H. Friedel B ACSIRO, EcoSciences Precinct, PO Box 2583, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia. BCSIRO, PO Box 2114, Alice Springs, NT 0871, Australia. CCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Alien grass species have been intentionally introduced into Australia since European settlement over 200 years ago, with many subsequently becoming weeds of natural environments. We have identified the subset of these weeds that have invaded and become dominant in environmentally important areas in the absence of modern anthropogenic disturbance, calling them ‘high-impact species’. We also examined why these high-impact species were successful, and what that might mean for management. Seventeen high-impact species were identified through literature review and expert advice; all had arrived by 1945, and all except one were imported intentionally, 16 of the 17 were perennial and four of the 17 were aquatic. They had become dominant in diverse habitats and climates, although some environments still remain largely uninvaded despite apparently ample opportunities. Why these species succeeded remains largely untested, but evidence suggests a combination of ecological novelty (both intended at time of introduction and unanticipated), propagule pressure (through high reproductive rate and dominance in nearby anthropogenically-disturbed habitats) and an ability to respond to, and even alter, natural disturbance regimes (especially fire and inundation). Serious knowledge gaps remain for these species, but indications are that resources could be better focused on understanding and managing this limited group of high-impact species.
    [Show full text]
  • 5-YEAR REVIEW Short Form Summary Species Reviewed: Pteralyxia Kauaiensis (Kaulu) Curre Nt Classification: Endangered
    5-YEAR REVIEW Short Form Summary Species Reviewed: Pteralyxia kauaiensis (kaulu) Curre nt Classification: Endangered Federal Register Notice announcing initiation of this review: [USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2008. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; initiation of 5-year status reviews of 70 species in Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Washington, and the Pacific Islands. Federal Register 73(83):23264- 23266. Lead Region/Field Office: Re gio n 1 /Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office, Honolulu, Hawaii Name of Reviewer(s): Marie Bruegmann, Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office, Plant Recovery Coordinator Marilet A. Zablan, Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office, Assistant Field Supervisor for Endangered Species Jeff Newman, Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office, Acting Deputy Field Supervisor Methodology used to complete this 5-year review: This review was conducted by staff of the Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), beginning on April 29, 2008. The review was based on the final critical habitat designation for Pteralyxia kauaiensis and other species from the island of Kauai (USFWS 2003), as well as a review of current, available information. The National Tropical Botanical Garden provided an initial draft of portions of the review and recommendations for conservation actions needed prior to the next five-year review. The evaluation of Samuel Aruch, biological consultant, was reviewed by the P lant Recovery Coordinator. The document was then reviewed by the Assistant Field Supervisor for Endangered Species and Acting Deputy Field Supervisor before submission to the Field Supervisor for approval. Background: For information regarding the species listing history and other facts, please refer to the Fish and Wildlife Service’s Environmental Conservation On-line System (ECOS) database for threatened and endangered species (http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_public).
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic, Environmental and Biotic Sources of Variation in the Nutrient Relations of Tropical Montane Forests
    Journal of Tropical Ecology (2016) 32:368–383. © Cambridge University Press 2015. This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. doi:10.1017/S0266467415000619 Geographic, environmental and biotic sources of variation in the nutrient relations of tropical montane forests James W. Dalling∗,†,1, Katherine Heineman∗, Grizelle Gonzalez´ ‡ and Rebecca Ostertag§ ∗ Department of Plant Biology and Program in Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology, University of Illinois, 505 S Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL 61801, USA † Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado Postal 0843–03092, Panama, Republic of Panama ‡ International Institute of Tropical Forestry, USDA Forest Service, Jard´ın Botanico´ Sur, 1201 Calle Ceiba, R´ıo Piedras, Puerto Rico, 00926–1119, USA § Department of Biology, University of Hawai‘i at Hilo, 200 W. Kawili Street, Hilo, HI 96720, USA (Received 24 September 2014; revised 9 October 2015; accepted 10 October 2015; first published online 20 November 2015) Abstract: Tropical montane forests (TMF) are associated with a widely observed suite of characteristics encompassing forest structure, plant traits and biogeochemistry. With respect to nutrient relations, montane forests are characterized by slow decomposition of organic matter, high investment in below-ground biomass and poor litter quality, relative to tropical lowland forests. However, within TMF there is considerable variation in substrate age, parent material, disturbance and species composition. Here we emphasize that many TMFs are likely to be co-limited by multiple nutrients, and that feedback among soil properties, species traits, microbial communities and environmental conditions drive forest productivity and soil carbon storage. To date, studies of the biogeochemistry of montane forests have been restricted to a few, mostly neotropical, sites and focused mainly on trees while ignoring mycorrhizas, epiphytes and microbial community structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Hawaiian Plants for Honey Bees: Oʻahu
    Native Hawaiian plants for honey bees: Oʻahu Elev Bloom Period* Scientific Name+ Common Name Soil Sun (ft) J F M A M J J A S O N D Forbs Argemone glauca Pua kala <6200 Well drained Full 2000- Partial- Astelia menziesiana Pua’akuhinia Well drained 7000 shade Bacopa monnieri Water hyssop <300 Moist Full-partial 650- Well drained- Bidens torta+ Ko’oko’olau Full 4000 moist 400- Dianella sandwicensis ‘uki’uki Dry to moist Full-partial 7000 Polynesian Heliotropium anomalum Coastal Well drained Full heliotrope Heliotropium Salt heliotrope <6800 Well drained Full curassavicum Melanthera integrifolia Nehe <150 Well drained Full-partial 2000- Lobelia hypoleuca Opelu Dry to moist Full-partial 5000 Portulaca lutea Yellow purslane <130 Well drained full Portulaca villosa Hairy purslane <2000 Well drained Full Scaevola coriacea Dwarf naupaka <150 Well drained Full Shoreline Well drained- Sesuvium portulacastrum <150 Full seapurslane wet Well drained- Waltheria indica ‘uhaloa <4000 Full moist Vines 600- Canavalia galeata ‘awikiwiki Moist Full-partial 2600 1000- Well drained- Freycinetia arborea ‘ie’ie Full-partial 5000 moist Ipomoea pes-caprae Puhuehue <2000 Well drained Full Jacquemontia Pāʻū o Hiʻiaka <100 Well drained Full-partial sandwicensis 600- Well drained- Smilax melastomifolia ‘hoi Shade 6800 wet Vigna marina Mohihihi <1000 Well drained Full-partial Shrubs 650- Abutilon menziesii Ko’oloa ‘ula Well drained Full-partial 1700 150- Well drained- Alyxia stellata Maile Full-partial 5000 moist 1000- Well drained- Broussaisia arguta Kanawao Partial
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment
    Final Environmental Assessment Kohala Mountain Watershed Management Project Districts of Hāmākua, North Kohala, and South Kohala County of Hawai‘i Island of Hawai‘i In accordance with Chapter 343, Hawai‘i Revised Statutes Proposed by: Kohala Watershed Partnership P.O. Box 437182 Kamuela, HI 96743 October 15, 2008 Table of Contents I. Summary................................................................................................................ .... 3 II. Overall Project Description ................................................................................... .... 6 III. Description of Actions............................................................................................ .. 10 IV. Description of Affected Environments .................................................................. .. 18 V. Summary of Major Impacts and Mitigation Measures........................................... .. 28 VI. Alternatives Considered......................................................................................... .. 35 VII. Anticipated Determination, Reasons Supporting the Anticipated Determination.. .. 36 VIII. List of Permits Required for Project...................................................................... .. 39 IX. Environmental Assessment Preparation Information ............................................ .. 40 X. References ............................................................................................................. .. 40 XI. Appendices ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]