DOCSLIB.ORG

Type Specimens of Birds in the American Museum of Natural History Mary Lecroy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Type Specimens of Birds in the American Museum of Natural History Mary Lecroy L Scientific Publications of the American Museum of Natural History E CROY: AMNH TYPE SPECIMENS 11 OF BIRDS, PART American Museum Novitates TYPE SPECIMENS OF BIRDS IN THE A MERICAN Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History MUSEUM OF NATUR AL HISTORY Publications Committee Robert S. Voss, Chair 11. PASSERIFORMES: PARULIDAE, DREPANIDIDAE, Board of Editors VIREONIDAE, ICTERIDAE, FRINGILLINAE, Jin Meng, Paleontology CARDUELINAE, ESTRILDIDAE, AND VIDUINAE Lorenzo Prendini, Invertebrate Zoology Robert S. Voss, Vertebrate Zoology Peter M. Whiteley, Anthropology MARY LECROY Managing Editor Mary Knight Submission procedures can be found at http://research.amnh.org/scipubs All issues of Novitates and Bulletin are available on the web from http://digitallibrary.amnh.org/dspace Order printed copies from http://www.amnhshop.com or via standard mail from: American Museum of Natural History—Scientific Publications Central Park West at 79th Street New York, NY 10024 This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (permanence of paper). AMNH BULLETIN 381 On the cover: Lithograph by J.G. Keulemans of Loxops wolstenholmei Rothschild (1900: pl. 65), front and back views of the type and only specimen, named for Henry Palmer’s field assistant, Ted Wolstenholme, who collected it in the 2013 mountains of the Wailua district, Oahu, Hawaii. No others were seen. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY TYPE SPECIMENS OF BIRDS IN THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY PART 11. PASSERIFORMES: PARULIDAE, DREPANIDIDAE, VIREONIDAE, ICTERIDAE, FRINGILLINAE, CARDUELINAE, ESTRILDIDAE, AND VIDUINAE MARY LECROY Department of Vertebrate Zoology (Ornithology) American Museum of Natural History BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY Number 381, 155 pp. Issued September 26, 2013 Copyright E American Museum of Natural History 2013 ISSN 0003-0090 CONTENTS Abstract.......................................................... 3 Introduction . ...................................................... 3 Parulidae .......................................................... 4 Drepanididae . ..................................................... 25 Vireonidae........................................................ 33 Icteridae......................................................... 43 Fringillinae....................................................... 58 Carduelinae....................................................... 60 Estrildidae . ..................................................... 84 Viduinae........................................................ 127 Acknowledgments................................................. 127 References....................................................... 128 Index.......................................................... 146 2 ABSTRACT This 11th part of ‘‘Type specimens of birds in the American Museum of Natural History’’ includes taxa in the passerine families included in volume 14 of Peters’ Check-list of birds of the world (Paynter, 1968). The original description of each name has been consulted and the currently accepted name of the taxon has been listed with reference to recent publications. The coordinates and modern names of type localities are given when found and comments on taxonomic history are provided. In this part, 352 names are treated; for 20 of these, name- bearing types are not in AMNH or were not found. This part of the type list, as well as all previous parts, are searchable and available for download from the AMNH Library website (http://digitallibrary.amnh.org/dspace/). INTRODUCTION The Rothschild Collection has been housed at the American Museum of Natural This 11th part of ‘‘Type specimens of birds History since its purchase in 1932. In the in the American Museum of Natural Histo- older literature, specimens in that collection ry’’ deals with taxa covered in volume 14 of were said to be housed in the ‘‘Tring Peters’ Check-list of birds of the world Museum.’’ The bird collection of the Natural (Paynter, 1968). As did earlier parts (Green- History Museum (formerly the British Mu- way, 1973, 1978, 1987; LeCroy and Sloss, seum (Natural History), BMNH, London) is 2000; and LeCroy, 2003, 2005, 2008, 2010, now housed at Tring on the former Roth- 2011, 2012), this part follows the order of schild estate, and this is a source of possible Peters’ Check-list series, which is the basis for confusion. I have avoided the use of ‘‘Tring the arrangement of the AMNH collection. Museum’’ in relation to AMNH specimens Since the publication of this series, DNA from the Rothschild Collection. studies of the phylogeny of birds have greatly Most of the types from the Rothschild altered our understanding of avian relation- Collection that are covered in this part of the ships, about which there is as yet no type list were listed by Hartert (1918, 1919a, consensus of opinion. Some of these studies 1920, 1928). In these lists he was attempting have been referred to in the following pages. to ‘‘fix’’ the types, as the Rothschild Collec- Dickinson (2003) is the authority for most of tion was never cataloged. I have accepted the currently accepted names for taxa cov- his nomination of ‘‘types’’ as designation of ered herein, but a number of recent regional lectotypes in cases where original descriptions works, as well as families that have been implied syntypes, as has been done in all of covered in Handbook of the birds of the world the previous parts of the AMNH type list. (del Hoyo et al., 2010, 2011) are referred to. Rothschild purchased the G.M. Mathews The format for this part follows that for collection of birds, and Hartert had only begun the previous ones. The citation of the name to list the Mathews types separately when and of the type locality is first given exactly the collection came to AMNH. None of the as it appeared in the original description. In families in this part of the type list had been the text portion for each taxon, the name of covered. When Mathews published his 1912 the type locality has been updated when that list of Australian birds, he did so under the eye has changed, with the older name given in of Hartert, and his catalog number for most of parentheses, and coordinates in degrees and his types was given. Later, after he began his mintues are given when found. AMNH own publication ‘‘Austral Avian Record,’’ he numbers for specimens in the type series of became less and less likely to definitely identify each name are given in boldface type the first his intended type specimen, especially as he time they are mentioned. If the catalog rushed to publish the later volumes of ‘‘The number of a specimen is followed by ‘‘bis,’’ birds of Australia.’’ In some cases I have it has been inserted into the catalog between designated lectotypes for Mathews’ names two specimens that had been cataloged when he has indicated his choice by attaching previously. his type label or writing ‘‘Type’’ on his label. 3 4 BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY NO. 381 I have designated the following lectotypes MNHN Muse´um National d’Histoire in part 11: Fringilla spodiogenys koenigi, Naturelle, Paris, France Spinus citrinelloides kikuyensis, Pytelia melba MZB Museum Zoologicum Bogor- mosambica, Pyrenestes ostrinus rothschildi, iense, Cibinong, Java, Indonesia Munia bichenovii bandi, Poephila acuticauda NMV National Museum of Victoria, nea, Alisteranus cinctus vinotinctus, Poephila Melbourne, Australia gouldiae kempi, and Munia subcastanea. PNG Papua New Guinea Types that might be expected to be in RMCA Royal Museum for Central AMNH, but were either not found or were Africa, Tervuren, Belgium found to be elsewhere are listed in brackets. RMNH Nationaal Centrum Voor Biodi- Paratypes for taxa for which the primary type versiteit Naturalis (formerly or types are not in AMNH are usually not Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke listed. The reader is referred to earlier parts Historie), Leiden, the Nether- of this type list by LeCroy and Sloss (2000), lands and LeCroy (2003, 2005, 2008, 2010, 2011, SAMA South Australian Museum, Ade- 2012) for expanded explanation of the laide, South Australia introductory material. SMF Forschungsinstitut und Natur- The following acronyms are used in the museum Senckenberg, Frankfurt text: am Main, Germany UMMZ Museum of Zoology, University AM Australian Museum, Sydney, of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI Australia USBGN United States Board on Geo- AMNH American Museum of Natural graphic Names, Washington, DC History, New York, NY USNM National Museum of Natural ANSP Academy of Natural Sciences, History, Washington, DC Philadelphia, PA YPM Yale Peabody Museum, Yale AOU American Ornithologists’ Union, University, New Haven, CT Washington, D.C. ZFMK Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut BIM Brooklyn Institute of Arts and und Museum A. Koenig, Bonn, Sciences (now Brooklyn Muse- Germany um), Brooklyn, NY ZMB Museum fu¨r Naturkunde, Zen- BMNH Natural History Museum, for- tralinstitut der Humboldt-Uni- merly British Museum (Natural versita¨t, Institut fu¨r Systema- History), Tring, UK tische Zoologie, Berlin CP Coleccion Phelps, Caracas, Ven- ZMO Zoologisk Museum, Oslo, Norway ezuela (formerly Christiania Museum) FMNH Field Museum of Natural Histo- ZSM Zoologische Staatssammlung, ry, Chicago, IL Munich, Germany ICZN International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature IES Instituto de Ecologia y Sistema´- PARULIDAE tica, Havana, Cuba MCZ Museum of Comparative Zoolo- The recent comprehensive phylogenetic gy, Harvard University,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vocalization Behavior of the Endangered Bahama Oriole (Icterus Northropi): Ontogenetic, Sexual, Temporal, Duetting Pair, and Geographic Variation Valerie A
    Loma Linda University TheScholarsRepository@LLU: Digital Archive of Research, Scholarship & Creative Works Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects 3-1-2011 Vocalization Behavior of the Endangered Bahama Oriole (Icterus northropi): Ontogenetic, Sexual, Temporal, Duetting Pair, and Geographic Variation Valerie A. Lee Loma Linda University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Lee, Valerie A., "Vocalization Behavior of the Endangered Bahama Oriole (Icterus northropi): Ontogenetic, Sexual, Temporal, Duetting Pair, and Geographic Variation" (2011). Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects. 37. http://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd/37 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by TheScholarsRepository@LLU: Digital Archive of Research, Scholarship & Creative Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects by an authorized administrator of TheScholarsRepository@LLU: Digital Archive of Research, Scholarship & Creative Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY School of Science and Technology in conjunction with the Faculty of Graduate Studies ____________________ Vocalization Behavior of the Endangered Bahama Oriole (Icterus northropi): Ontogenetic, Sexual, Temporal, Duetting Pair, and Geographic Variation by Valerie A. Lee ____________________ A Thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biology ____________________ March 2011 © 2011 Valerie A. Lee All Rights Reserved Each person whose signature appears below certifies that this thesis in his/her opinion is adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree Master of Science. , Chairperson William K. Hayes, Professor of Biology Stephen G.
    [Show full text]
  • Dominican Republic Endemics of Hispaniola II 1St February to 9Th February 2021 (9 Days)
    Dominican Republic Endemics of Hispaniola II 1st February to 9th February 2021 (9 days) Palmchat by Adam Riley Although the Dominican Republic is perhaps best known for its luxurious beaches, outstanding food and vibrant culture, this island has much to offer both the avid birder and general naturalist alike. Because of the amazing biodiversity sustained on the island, Hispaniola ranks highest in the world as a priority for bird protection! This 8-day birding tour provides the perfect opportunity to encounter nearly all of the island’s 32 endemic bird species, plus other Greater Antillean specialities. We accomplish this by thoroughly exploring the island’s variety of habitats, from the evergreen and Pine forests of the Sierra de Bahoruco to the dry forests of the coast. Furthermore, our accommodation ranges from remote cabins deep in the forest to well-appointed hotels on the beach, each with its own unique local flair. Join us for this delightful tour to the most diverse island in the Caribbean! RBL Dominican Republic Itinerary 2 THE TOUR AT A GLANCE… THE ITINERARY Day 1 Arrival in Santo Domingo Day 2 Santo Domingo Botanical Gardens to Sabana del Mar (Paraiso Caño Hondo) Day 3 Paraiso Caño Hondo to Santo Domingo Day 4 Salinas de Bani to Pedernales Day 5 Cabo Rojo & Southern Sierra de Bahoruco Day 6 Cachote to Villa Barrancoli Day 7 Northern Sierra de Bahoruco Day 8 La Placa, Laguna Rincon to Santo Domingo Day 9 International Departures TOUR ROUTE MAP… RBL Dominican Republic Itinerary 3 THE TOUR IN DETAIL… Day 1: Arrival in Santo Domingo.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal 2017-C-15 Below)
    AOS Classification Committee – North and Middle America Proposal Set 2017-C 15 March 2017 No. Page Title 01 02 Revise the linear sequence of genera in Fringillidae, and transfer Serinus mozambicus to Crithagra 02 09 Split Brown Creeper (Certhia americana) into two species 03 16 Transfer Violet-bellied Hummingbird from Damophila to Juliamyia 04 18 Elevate Colaptes auratus mexicanoides to species rank 05 23 Split Nashville Warbler (Oreothlypis ruficapilla) into two species 06 26 Adopt new English names for Melozone biarcuata and Melozone cabanisi 07 29 Lump Thayer’s Gull (Larus thayeri) with Iceland Gull (Larus glaucoides) 08 43 Change the spelling of the English names of Le Conte’s Thrasher (Toxostoma lecontei) and Le Conte’s Sparrow (Ammodramus leconteii) 09 46 Add Common Scoter (Melanitta nigra) to the Main List 10 49 Add Blyth’s Reed Warbler (Acrocephalus dumetorum) to the Main List 11 52 Add Chatham Albatross (Thalassarche eremita) to the Main List 12 55 Add Red-legged Honeycreeper (Cyanerpes cyaneus) to the U.S. list 13 57 Add nine species recorded from Greenland to the Main List 14 68 Split Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii) into two species 1 2017-C-1 N&MA Classification Committee pp. 658-679 Revise the linear sequence of genera in Fringillidae, and transfer Serinus mozambicus to Crithagra Background: In the past decade, several phylogenetic papers have elucidated relationships within the Fringillidae (Arnaiz-Villena et al. 2007, 2008, Nguembock et al. 2009, Lerner et al. 2011, Zuccon et al. 2012). NACC already has taken a series of actions (reviewed below) based on this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Sericornis, Acanthizidae)
    GENETIC AND MORPHOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION AND PHYLOGENY IN THE AUSTRALO-PAPUAN SCRUBWRENS (SERICORNIS, ACANTHIZIDAE) LESLIE CHRISTIDIS,1'2 RICHARD $CHODDE,l AND PETER R. BAVERSTOCK 3 •Divisionof Wildlifeand Ecology, CSIRO, P.O. Box84, Lyneham,Australian Capital Territory 2605, Australia, 2Departmentof EvolutionaryBiology, Research School of BiologicalSciences, AustralianNational University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia, and 3EvolutionaryBiology Unit, SouthAustralian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia ASS•CRACr.--Theinterrelationships of 13 of the 14 speciescurrently recognized in the Australo-Papuan oscinine scrubwrens, Sericornis,were assessedby protein electrophoresis, screening44 presumptivelo.ci. Consensus among analysesindicated that Sericorniscomprises two primary lineagesof hithertounassociated species: S. beccarii with S.magnirostris, S.nouhuysi and the S. perspicillatusgroup; and S. papuensisand S. keriwith S. spiloderaand the S. frontalis group. Both lineages are shared by Australia and New Guinea. Patternsof latitudinal and altitudinal allopatry and sequencesof introgressiveintergradation are concordantwith these groupings,but many featuresof external morphologyare not. Apparent homologiesin face, wing and tail markings, used formerly as the principal criteria for grouping species,are particularly at variance and are interpreted either as coinherited ancestraltraits or homo- plasies. Distribution patternssuggest that both primary lineageswere first split vicariantly between
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Nogoa River / Theresa Creek Sub-Basin !
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 148°E ! W Loga r I ! e n C eek s s a t a ! L k ek c o e e r k Lake R ! g C e e M a F s e Vermont i n r e r v i l h ! c ug C e le C C H tt r e re r e r e e t r ! ! DRAFT l a c ! e ! e i ! r h ! C e k e B ! C ! ree s ! k l r ! o k rr M a C ! C e n r i e ! ! e s ! p C ! N i ! k l r ! hil e ! ! k ! P e ! e ISAAC k ! ! e ! r ! ! C ! B HEVm2042 n REGIONAL r ! r k i e ! e e t g s Cr s a n We l ow k ! e o D COUNCIL e w r ! Dysart C C C m Cre ek teph ! s ! p n r a bel l S e e e ns Cr ph e ek ee e ! k k k Va u k e t ng a k e r S e re C r e C t d e ! k e g e r Cre r r r e G e ek olfan T e C i l b Isaac River C ! W a l C b k ! ! e e e k ll e e Cr ! r e Sub-basin o r a e ! B ! t y Cr Burdekin Basin a ! A M s ! ! e p n ! k T e s ! ! ! e ! h ! p tt Cre Back C ek l ! e co e e ! t S r ! ! S y ! ! ! ! B C ! ! k ! ! ! ! r ! e ! a C ! ! ! e ! t ! k ! e ! h g HEVm2009 ! k e ! ! ! r n ! ! ! k ! ! l ! f C ! ! o C k ! ! a k R r ! f e e e ! S e l e re k ! e e ! ! r! C ! ! o r ! ! p tle! y C ! ! r n r i C u ! o ! n W H b g ! k ! g ! A ! n o rC fe Cr i e R p e r ! l e k r ! C re o e ! e ! e ek p k r k ek S ! R S e ! k e ! e an C e e e ! z r r Clermont r d ! ee ! y r C ll C k C C e C e k ! h ! e S e C r ! a F r e ! t l y e e r ! p ! y ! ! C ! n k e d e k ! e o ! ! e r a k ! e ! ! ! C e l ! ! ! i ! y ! k R O l M ! e g o ! k l ! w ! e ! ! T ! e e a ! ! r S ! C ! r u ! ! M ! ! ! k ! s C G e ! ! ! HEVm2063 ! a G ! e ! a ! ! r l ! o y erm ! Theresa Creek main g ! r a ! C k ! u ! t o ! n c n ! E D ! ! k ! channel (including dam)
    [Show full text]
  • Checklistccamp2016.Pdf
    2 3 Participant’s Name: Tour Company: Date#1: / / Tour locations Date #2: / / Tour locations Date #3: / / Tour locations Date #4: / / Tour locations Date #5: / / Tour locations Date #6: / / Tour locations Date #7: / / Tour locations Date #8: / / Tour locations Codes used in Column A Codes Sample Species a = Abundant Red-lored Parrot c = Common White-headed Wren u = Uncommon Gray-cheeked Nunlet r = Rare Sapayoa vr = Very rare Wing-banded Antbird m = Migrant Bay-breasted Warbler x = Accidental Dwarf Cuckoo (E) = Endemic Stripe-cheeked Woodpecker Species marked with an asterisk (*) can be found in the birding areas visited on the tour outside of the immediate Canopy Camp property such as Nusagandi, San Francisco Reserve, El Real and Darien National Park/Cerro Pirre. Of course, 4with incredible biodiversity and changing environments, there is always the possibility to see species not listed here. If you have a sighting not on this list, please let us know! No. Bird Species 1A 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Tinamous Great Tinamou u 1 Tinamus major Little Tinamou c 2 Crypturellus soui Ducks Black-bellied Whistling-Duck 3 Dendrocygna autumnalis u Muscovy Duck 4 Cairina moschata r Blue-winged Teal 5 Anas discors m Curassows, Guans & Chachalacas Gray-headed Chachalaca 6 Ortalis cinereiceps c Crested Guan 7 Penelope purpurascens u Great Curassow 8 Crax rubra r New World Quails Tawny-faced Quail 9 Rhynchortyx cinctus r* Marbled Wood-Quail 10 Odontophorus gujanensis r* Black-eared Wood-Quail 11 Odontophorus melanotis u Grebes Least Grebe 12 Tachybaptus dominicus u www.canopytower.com 3 BirdChecklist No.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeography of Finches and Sparrows
    In: Animal Genetics ISBN: 978-1-60741-844-3 Editor: Leopold J. Rechi © 2009 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Chapter 1 PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF FINCHES AND SPARROWS Antonio Arnaiz-Villena*, Pablo Gomez-Prieto and Valentin Ruiz-del-Valle Department of Immunology, University Complutense, The Madrid Regional Blood Center, Madrid, Spain. ABSTRACT Fringillidae finches form a subfamily of songbirds (Passeriformes), which are presently distributed around the world. This subfamily includes canaries, goldfinches, greenfinches, rosefinches, and grosbeaks, among others. Molecular phylogenies obtained with mitochondrial DNA sequences show that these groups of finches are put together, but with some polytomies that have apparently evolved or radiated in parallel. The time of appearance on Earth of all studied groups is suggested to start after Middle Miocene Epoch, around 10 million years ago. Greenfinches (genus Carduelis) may have originated at Eurasian desert margins coming from Rhodopechys obsoleta (dessert finch) or an extinct pale plumage ancestor; it later acquired green plumage suitable for the greenfinch ecological niche, i.e.: woods. Multicolored Eurasian goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis) has a genetic extant ancestor, the green-feathered Carduelis citrinella (citril finch); this was thought to be a canary on phonotypical bases, but it is now included within goldfinches by our molecular genetics phylograms. Speciation events between citril finch and Eurasian goldfinch are related with the Mediterranean Messinian salinity crisis (5 million years ago). Linurgus olivaceus (oriole finch) is presently thriving in Equatorial Africa and was included in a separate genus (Linurgus) by itself on phenotypical bases. Our phylograms demonstrate that it is and old canary. Proposed genus Acanthis does not exist. Twite and linnet form a separate radiation from redpolls.
    [Show full text]
  • Fitzroy Basin Resource Operations Plan
    Fitzroy Basin Resource Operations Plan September 2014 Amended September 2015 This publication has been compiled by Water Policy—Department of Natural Resource and Mines. © State of Queensland, 2015 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Contents Chapter 1 Preliminary .............................................................................. 1 1 Short title ............................................................................................................. 1 2 Commencement of the resource operations plan amendment ............................. 1 3 Purpose of plan ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationships of the Hawaiian Honeycreepers (Drepaninini) As Indicated by Dna-Dna Hybridization
    THE RELATIONSHIPS OF THE HAWAIIAN HONEYCREEPERS (DREPANININI) AS INDICATED BY DNA-DNA HYBRIDIZATION CH^RrES G. SIBLEY AND Jo• E. AHLQUIST Departmentof Biologyand PeabodyMuseum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511 USA ABSTRACT.--Twenty-twospecies of Hawaiian honeycreepers(Fringillidae: Carduelinae: Drepaninini) are known. Their relationshipsto other groups of passefineswere examined by comparing the single-copyDNA sequencesof the Apapane (Himationesanguinea) with those of 5 speciesof carduelinefinches, 1 speciesof Fringilla, 15 speciesof New World nine- primaried oscines(Cardinalini, Emberizini, Thraupini, Parulini, Icterini), and members of 6 other families of oscines(Turdidae, Monarchidae, Dicaeidae, Sylviidae, Vireonidae, Cor- vidae). The DNA-DNA hybridization data support other evidence indicating that the Hawaiian honeycreepersshared a more recent common ancestorwith the cardue!ine finches than with any of the other groupsstudied and indicate that this divergenceoccurred in the mid-Miocene, 15-20 million yr ago. The colonizationof the Hawaiian Islandsby the ancestralspecies that radiated to produce the Hawaiian honeycreeperscould have occurredat any time between 20 and 5 million yr ago. Becausethe honeycreeperscaptured so many ecologicalniches, however, it seemslikely that their ancestor was the first passefine to become established in the islands and that it arrived there at the time of, or soon after, its separationfrom the carduelinelineage. If so, this colonist arrived before the present islands from Hawaii to French Frigate Shoal were formed by the volcanic"hot-spot" now under the island of Hawaii. Therefore,the ancestral drepaninine may have colonizedone or more of the older Hawaiian Islandsand/or Emperor Seamounts,which also were formed over the "hot-spot" and which reachedtheir present positions as the result of tectonic crustal movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining a Monophyletic Cardinalini
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 45 (2007) 1014–1032 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Defining a monophyletic Cardinalini: A molecular perspective John Klicka a,*, Kevin Burns b, Garth M. Spellman a,1 a Barrick Museum of Natural History, Box 454012, University of Nevada Las Vegas, 4505 Maryland, Parkway, Las Vegas, NV 89154-4012, USA b Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182-4614, USA Received 28 March 2007; revised 29 June 2007; accepted 10 July 2007 Available online 19 July 2007 Abstract Within the New World nine-primaried oscine assemblage, feeding morphology and behavior have long been used as a guideline for assigning membership to subgroups. For example, birds with stout, conical bills capable of crushing heavy seeds have generally been placed within the tribe Cardinalini (cardinal-grosbeaks). Many workers have tried to characterize this group more definitively, using a variety of morphological characters; however, the characters used often conflicted with one another. Previous molecular studies addressing the monophyly of Cardinalini have had only limited sampling within the group. In this study, we analyze mtDNA sequence data from all genera and 34 of the 42 Cardinalini species (sensu [Sibley, C.G., Monroe, B.L., 1990. Distribution and Taxonomy of the Birds of the World, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT]) to address the monophyly of the group and to reconstruct the most com- plete phylogeny of this tribe published to date. We found strong support for a redefined Cardinalini that now includes some members previously placed within Thraupini (tanagers; the genera Piranga, Habia, Chlorothraupis, and Amaurospiza) and some members previ- ously placed within the Parulini (wood-warblers; the genus Granatellus).
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Upper Palumeu River Watershed (Grensgebergte and Kasikasima) of Southeastern Suriname
    Rapid Assessment Program A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Upper Palumeu River Watershed (Grensgebergte and Kasikasima) of Southeastern Suriname Editors: Leeanne E. Alonso and Trond H. Larsen 67 CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL - SURINAME CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ANTON DE KOM UNIVERSITY OF SURINAME THE SURINAME FOREST SERVICE (LBB) NATURE CONSERVATION DIVISION (NB) FOUNDATION FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION CONTROL (SBB) SURINAME CONSERVATION FOUNDATION THE HARBERS FAMILY FOUNDATION Rapid Assessment Program A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Upper Palumeu River Watershed RAP (Grensgebergte and Kasikasima) of Southeastern Suriname Bulletin of Biological Assessment 67 Editors: Leeanne E. Alonso and Trond H. Larsen CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL - SURINAME CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ANTON DE KOM UNIVERSITY OF SURINAME THE SURINAME FOREST SERVICE (LBB) NATURE CONSERVATION DIVISION (NB) FOUNDATION FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION CONTROL (SBB) SURINAME CONSERVATION FOUNDATION THE HARBERS FAMILY FOUNDATION The RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment is published by: Conservation International 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 500 Arlington, VA USA 22202 Tel : +1 703-341-2400 www.conservation.org Cover photos: The RAP team surveyed the Grensgebergte Mountains and Upper Palumeu Watershed, as well as the Middle Palumeu River and Kasikasima Mountains visible here. Freshwater resources originating here are vital for all of Suriname. (T. Larsen) Glass frogs (Hyalinobatrachium cf. taylori) lay their
    [Show full text]
  • The Phylogenetic Relationships and Generic Limits of Finches
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 62 (2012) 581–596 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev The phylogenetic relationships and generic limits of finches (Fringillidae) ⇑ Dario Zuccon a, , Robert Pryˆs-Jones b, Pamela C. Rasmussen c, Per G.P. Ericson d a Molecular Systematics Laboratory, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden b Bird Group, Department of Zoology, Natural History Museum, Akeman St., Tring, Herts HP23 6AP, UK c Department of Zoology and MSU Museum, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA d Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden article info abstract Article history: Phylogenetic relationships among the true finches (Fringillidae) have been confounded by the recurrence Received 30 June 2011 of similar plumage patterns and use of similar feeding niches. Using a dense taxon sampling and a com- Revised 27 September 2011 bination of nuclear and mitochondrial sequences we reconstructed a well resolved and strongly sup- Accepted 3 October 2011 ported phylogenetic hypothesis for this family. We identified three well supported, subfamily level Available online 17 October 2011 clades: the Holoarctic genus Fringilla (subfamly Fringillinae), the Neotropical Euphonia and Chlorophonia (subfamily Euphoniinae), and the more widespread subfamily Carduelinae for the remaining taxa. Keywords: Although usually separated in a different
    [Show full text]