Stratigraphy, Structure, and Economic Geology of the Iliamna Quadrangle, Alaska

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stratigraphy, Structure, and Economic Geology of the Iliamna Quadrangle, Alaska Stratigraphy, Structure, and Economic Geology of the Iliamna Quadrangle, Alaska GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1368-B Stratigraphy, Structure, and Economic Geology of the Iliamna Quadrangle, Alaska By ROBERT L. DETTERMAN and BRUCE L. REED GEOLOGY OF THE ILIAMNA QUADRANGLE , ALASKA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1368- B A comprehensive study of Mesozoic to Holocene sedimentary, volcanic, and plutonic rocks of the Iliamna quadrangle UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1980 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY H. William Menard, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Detterman, Robert L. Stratigraphy, structure, and economic geology of the Iliamna quadrangle, Alaska. (Geology of the Iliamna quadrangle, Alaska) (Geological Survey bulletin ; 1368-B) Bibliography: p. B82 - B86. Supt.ofDocs.no.: I 193:1368-6 1. Geology-Alaska-Alaska Peninsula. I. Reed, Bruce L., 1934- joint author. II. Title. III. Series. IV. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Bulletin ; 1368-B. QE75.B9 no. 1368-B [QE84.A34] 557.3'08s [557.98'4] 79-607115 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Omce Washington, D. C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-03263-5 CONTENTS Page Abstract ________________________________________ Bl Introduction _________________________________________ 2 Previous work ______________________________________ 3 Present investigations ______________________________ 4 Acknowledgments ___________________________________ 5 Geologic setting ___________________________________ 5 Descriptive geology_________..______________________ 6 Permian(?), Triassic, and Jurassic Systems-__________________ 6 Kakhonak Complex _______________________________ 6 Triassic System ________________________________ 9 Cottonwood Bay Greenstone ____________-________-__ 9 Kamishak Formation-__________________________ 11 Bruin Limestone Member_________________________ 11 Middle Member _______________________________ 14 Ursus Member __________________________________________ 16 Jurassic System _______________________________ 17 Talkeetna Formation _____________________________ 18 Intrusive rocks ________________________________ 20 Mafic and ultramafic plutonic rocks __________________ 21 Pyroxenite________________________________ 21 Hornblendite _____________________________ 22 Gabbro __________________________________ 22 Diorite ____________________________________ 23 Quartz diorite _________________________________ 24 Quartz monzonite _____________________________ 25 Trondhjemite ________________________________ 28 Tuxedni Group__________________________________ 28 Chinitna Formation ______________________________ 32 Naknek Formation________________________________ 34 Jurassic or Cretaceous Systems ________________________ 38 Sedimentary rocks, undivided ____________________________ 38 Cretaceous System _______ _________________________ 41 Kaguyak Formation ____________________________ 41 Quartz monzonite ______________________________ 42 Cretaceous or Tertiary Systems __________________________ 43 Granodiorite and quartz monzonite ____________________ 43 Tertiary System _______________________________________ 44 Copper Lake Formation ______________________________ 45 Lower conglomerate member _______________________ 45 Sandstone and siltstone member _________________ 46 Upper conglomerate member ____________________ 47 Sedimentary rocks, undivided-______________________ 48 Volcanic rocks ___________________________________ 49 Basalt and andesite _________________________ 50 in IV CONTENTS Descriptive geology Continued Tertiary System Continued Volcanic rocks Continued Volcanic rubble and breccia _ ___ __ __ _________ 55 Gibraltar Lake Tuff ______________________________ 56 Lower member _ _ _ ______ _ _ __ __ ______ __ ___ 56 Upper member ___ __ _____ ___ ___ ___ .. __ ____ ___ _ 57 Intricate Basalt _____ _______ ___ __ __________ ___ _ 58 Intrusive rocks ___ ________ __ ___ _________________ 60 Quartz diorite ___ ___ ____ ____________ ______ _ 60 Intrusive rocks, undivided __ ______ __ ___ ______ __ 60 Volcanic necks, sills, and dikes _ __ __ _ - __ __ __ ___ _ ___ _ 61 Tertiary or Quaternary Systems-- ________ __ ___ ___ _ _____ _ 62 Volcanic rocks, undivided- _____ __ __ _______ _ _______ _ 62 Quaternary System _________________________________ 63 Volcanic rocks, undivided _ ____ ___________ __ _ ____ _____ 63 Augustine Volcanics __ ___ __ _____ _ __ ____ _ __ __ ___ 64 Surficial deposits ____ ___ __ ___ _ __ ______ __ ___ _ 66 Structural geology _ __ ____ _ ________ ____ ________________ 66 Regional setting ___ ________ _ __ __________ ___ ___ ___ 66 Folds __________ _ ______ - _______________________ 68 Faults __ _ _____ __ ______ __. ____________ _ __________ 68 Bruin Bay fault _________________________________ 68 Geologic history _ ___ ___________ __ __ ___ _____ _______ _ 70 Economic geology _ __ __ _ _______ _ _ __ _____ __ ______ 71 Petroleum _______________________________________ 72 Copper _ _ ______ _ __ _____ _ ______ __ __-_ ______ ___ 75 Gold and silver ___________________________________ 77 Iron ____________________________________ ______ 79 Limestone _ __ ____ ______ ______ _____ ____ __ ______ _ 80 Pumice _ _ _ ____ _ __ ________ _ ___ __ __ ___ ________ 81 Miscellaneous minerals _ ____ ___ _ _ ___ _____ _ ____ ___ 81 References cited _ ______ ______ ____ ___ ___ _ ____ ______ ___ 82 ILLUSTRATIONS Page PLATE 1. Geologic map of the Iliamna quadrangle, Alaska _______In pocket FIGURE 1. Index map showing location of Iliamna quadrangle __________ B3 2. Generalized stratigraphic sections of Kamishak Formation, Bruin Bay and Iliamna Bay, Ursus Cove, and Kirschner Lake __ 13 3. Stratigraphic section of Tuxedni Group and Chinitna Formation, Iniskin Peninsula __________________________ 30 4. Stratigraphic sections of Naknek Formation, Iniskin Peninsula and Kamishak Bay ___________________ 35 CONTENTS V Page FIGURE 5. Type section of Copper Lake Formation, Upper and Lower Copper Lake and Kakhonak Lake area _______. 46 6. Map showing location of natural resources in the Iliamna quadrangle ________________________. 74 TABLES Page TABLE 1. Potassium-argon ages and analytical data for some intrusive rocks in the Iliamna quadrangle _________________B26 2. Geographic and stratigraphic distribution of fossils in Naknek Formation ____________________________ 39 3. Chemical analysis of selected Tertiary volcanic rocks _ _____ _ 53 4. Chemical analysis of selected rocks from Augustine Volcanics __ 65 GEOLOGY OF THE ILIAMNA QUADRANGLE, ALASKA STRATIGRAPHY, STRUCTURE, AND ECONOMIC GEOLOGY OF THE ILIAMNA QUADRANGLE, ALASKA By ROBERT L. DETTERMAN and BRUCE L. REED ABSTRACT The Iliamna quadrangle, located near the north end of the Alaska Peninsula, is part of the magmatic arc that characterizes the peninsula. Bedrock in the quadrangle con­ sists of sedimentary, metamorphic, and intrusive and extrusive igneous rocks of Per- mian(?) to Holocene age. The named rock units include one group, 11 formations, and one complex; some are newly named, others revised. The oldest rocks are part of the Kakhonak Complex (new), a metamorphic rock preserved mainly as roof pendants in the Alaska-Aleutian Range batholith. The com­ plex contains chloritic greenschist, quartz-mica-garnet schist, gneiss, quartzite, mar­ ble, and amphibolite. Metamorphism is mainly of greenschist and low amphibolite facies; unmetamorphosed equivalent rocks are included in the Cottonwood Bay Greenstone (new), Kamishak Formation (revised) of Late Triassic age, and Talkeetna Formation of Early Jurassic age. A basin east of the early Mesozoic magmatic arc received at least 6,000 m of highly fossiliferous marine clastic sediments during the late Mesozoic. During Middle Juras­ sic time, volcanogenic graywacke and conglomerate with thick interbeds of siltstone and shale were deposited. These rocks are divided into the Red Glacier Formation, Gaikema Sandstone, Fitz Creek Siltstone, Cynthia Falls Sandstone, Twist Creek Siltstone, and Bowser Formation of the Tuxedni Group and the overlying Chinitna Formation, subdivided into the Tonnie and Paveloff Siltstone Members. By Late Juras­ sic time, the Alaska-Aleutian Range batholith had been emplaced as the core of a volcano-plutonic complex that supplied most of the detritus to the flanking basin on the southeast. The conglomerate, siltstone and shale, and arkosic sandstone of this basin are mapped as the Chisik Conglomerate, Snug Harbor Siltstone, Pomeroy Arkose, and upper sandstone members of the Naknek Formation. Deposition into this basin con­ tinued throughout the Cretaceous, but within the quadrangle, Lower Cretaceous rocks were eroded before deposition of the sediments forming the Kaguyak Formation in Late Cretaceous time. A Tertiary basin, developed in what is now Cook Inlet, received about 6,500 m of nonmarine clastic rock. A small part of the basal sequence is preserved as the Copper Lake Formation (new). The greater part of the nonmarine Tertiary sequence underlies Cook Inlet. Three periods of intrusive activity are recorded. The oldest began in late Early Jurassic time, about 180 m.y. ago, and continued for about 20 m.y. Rocks formed are chiefly diorite, quartz diorite, and granodiorite with lesser amounts of hormblendite and quartz monzonite, part of a 1,300-km-long magmatic arc in southern Alaska. A Bl B2 GEOLOGY OF THE ILIAMNA QUADRANGLE, ALASKA second period, between 83 and 55 m.y. ago, produced small plutons, chiefly of quartz monzonite and granodiorite,
Recommended publications
  • Podiform Chromite Deposits—Database and Grade and Tonnage Models
    Podiform Chromite Deposits—Database and Grade and Tonnage Models Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5157 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey COVER View of the abandoned Chrome Concentrating Company mill, opened in 1917, near the No. 5 chromite mine in Del Puerto Canyon, Stanislaus County, California (USGS photograph by Dan Mosier, 1972). Insets show (upper right) specimen of massive chromite ore from the Pillikin mine, El Dorado County, California, and (lower left) specimen showing disseminated layers of chromite in dunite from the No. 5 mine, Stanislaus County, California (USGS photographs by Dan Mosier, 2012). Podiform Chromite Deposits—Database and Grade and Tonnage Models By Dan L. Mosier, Donald A. Singer, Barry C. Moring, and John P. Galloway Scientific Investigations Report 2012-5157 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 This report and any updates to it are available online at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2012/5157/ For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Mosier, D.L., Singer, D.A., Moring, B.C., and Galloway, J.P., 2012, Podiform chromite deposits—database and grade and tonnage models: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Or Early Callovian) Ammonites from Alaska and Montana
    Jurassic (Bathonian or Early Callovian) Ammonites From Alaska and Montana By RALPH W. IMLAY SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 374-C Descr$tions and illustrations of ctphalopods of possible late Middle Jurasric (Bathonian) age UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1962 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. CONTENTS Page Page C- 1 Age of the faunas-Continued C- 1 Callovian versus Bathonian in Greenland- - - - _ - - _ - - C-2 Callovian versus Bathonian in Alaska and Montana- -- - Stratigraphic summary- __ --______ _ - - - -- - ---.- -- -.- - - C-2 Paleogeographic considerations- - -_-- -- ---- ---- Cook Inlet region, Alaska -______--------.-.--..--c-2 Summation of the evidence- - - _._ _ - _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - Iniskin Peninsula-_-_______----.--------~.--C-2 Comparisons with other faunas---------___----------- Peninsula north of Chinitna Bay----- __._ _ _._ - C-3 \Vestern interior of Canada- - - -- -- -____------- --- Talkeetna Mountains ----___-_ - - -- ---- - - -- - -- C-3 Arctic region-_-_---___-_----------------------- Western Montana- - -----__-----------------.---C-5 other regions--__-__-____----------------------- Rocky Mountain front north of the Sun River- (2-5 Geographic distribution ___-___ --- - ---------- ------ -- - Drummond area--- ---_____ _--- -- -.-- ---- -- - C-10 Summary of results- --_-____-_----_---_-_----------- Age ofthe faunas-----------_----------------------- GI0 Systematic descriptions--_ _ _ - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Evidence from Alaska---____________--------------C-10 Literature cited _-_-_---______----------------------- Evidence from Montana --_-_____ --- - - -- .--- --- - - C-12 Index---__--___-_-_------------------------------- ILLUSTRATIONS [Plates 1-3 follow index] PLATE 1. Holcophylloceras, Oecotraustes (Paroecotraustes) ?, and Arctocephalites (Cranocephalites). 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermochronology of the Talkeetna Intraoceanic Arc of Alaska: Ar/Ar, U‐Th/He, Sm‐Nd, and Lu‐Hf Dating
    TECTONICS, VOL. 30, TC1011, doi:10.1029/2010TC002798, 2011 Thermochronology of the Talkeetna intraoceanic arc of Alaska: Ar/Ar, U‐Th/He, Sm‐Nd, and Lu‐Hf dating B. R. Hacker,1 Peter B. Kelemen,2 Matthew Rioux,1,3 Michael O. McWilliams,4 Philip B. Gans,1 Peter W. Reiners,5 Paul W. Layer,6 Ulf Söderlund,7 and Jeffrey D. Vervoort8 Received 17 September 2010; revised 8 December 2010; accepted 27 December 2010; published 26 February 2011. [1] As one of two well‐exposed intraoceanic arcs, the of the Talkeetna arc was spatially variable. One‐ Talkeetna arc of Alaska affords an opportunity to under- dimensional finite difference thermal models show that stand processes deep within arcs. This study reports new this kind of spatial variability is inherent to intraoceanic Lu‐Hf and Sm‐Nd garnet ages, 40Ar/39Ar hornblende, arcs with simple construction histories. Citation: Hacker, mica and whole‐rock ages, and U‐Th/He zircon and B. R., P. B. Kelemen, M. Rioux, M. O. McWilliams, P. B. Gans, apatite ages from the Chugach Mountains, Talkeetna P. W. Reiners, P. W. Layer, U. Söderlund, and J. D. Vervoort Mountains, and Alaska Peninsula, which, in conjunc- (2011), Thermochronology of the Talkeetna intraoceanic arc of tion with existing geochronology, constrain the thermal Alaska: Ar/Ar, U‐Th/He, Sm‐Nd, and Lu‐Hf dating, Tectonics, history of the arc. Zircon U‐Pb ages establish the 30, TC1011, doi:10.1029/2010TC002798. main period of arc magmatism as 202–181 Ma in the Chugach Mountains and 183–153 Ma in the 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Text of Draft
    Reconnaissance bedrock geologic map for the northern Alaska Peninsula area, southwest Alaska Including the Dillingham, Iliamna, Lake Clark, Taylor Mountains and the western part of the Kenai and Seldovia 1:250,000-scale quadrangles Compiled by Frederic H. Wilson, Robert B. Blodgett, Charles D. Blomé, Solmaz Mohadjer, Cindi C. Preller, Edward P. Klimasauskas, Bruce M. Gamble, and Warren L. Coonrad DISCLAIMER This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. This World-Wide-Web publication was prepared by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. Although all data and software published on this Web-site have been used by the USGS, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by the USGS as to the accuracy of the data and related materials and (or) the functioning of the software. The act of distribution shall not constitute any such warranty, and no responsibility is assumed by the USGS in the use of this data, software, or related materials.
    [Show full text]
  • NSF 03-021, Arctic Research in the United States
    This document has been archived. Home is Where the Habitat is An Ecosystem Foundation for Wildlife Distribution and Behavior This article was prepared The lands and near-shore waters of Alaska remaining from recent geomorphic activities such by Page Spencer, stretch from 48° to 68° north latitude and from 130° as glaciers, floods, and volcanic eruptions.* National Park Service, west to 175° east longitude. The immense size of Ecosystems in Alaska are spread out along Anchorage, Alaska; Alaska is frequently portrayed through its super- three major bioclimatic gradients, represented by Gregory Nowacki, USDA Forest Service; Michael imposition on the continental U.S., stretching from the factors of climate (temperature and precipita- Fleming, U.S. Geological Georgia to California and from Minnesota to tion), vegetation (forested to non-forested), and Survey; Terry Brock, Texas. Within Alaska’s broad geographic extent disturbance regime. When the 32 ecoregions are USDA Forest Service there are widely diverse ecosystems, including arrayed along these gradients, eight large group- (retired); and Torre Arctic deserts, rainforests, boreal forests, alpine ings, or ecological divisions, emerge. In this paper Jorgenson, ABR, Inc. tundra, and impenetrable shrub thickets. This land we describe the eight ecological divisions, with is shaped by storms and waves driven across 8000 details from their component ecoregions and rep- miles of the Pacific Ocean, by huge river systems, resentative photos. by wildfire and permafrost, by volcanoes in the Ecosystem structures and environmental Ring of Fire where the Pacific plate dives beneath processes largely dictate the distribution and the North American plate, by frequent earth- behavior of wildlife species.
    [Show full text]
  • Facies and Mafic
    Metamorphic Facies and Metamorphosed Mafic Rocks l V.M. Goldschmidt (1911, 1912a), contact Metamorphic Facies and metamorphosed pelitic, calcareous, and Metamorphosed Mafic Rocks psammitic hornfelses in the Oslo region l Relatively simple mineral assemblages Reading: Winter Chapter 25. (< 6 major minerals) in the inner zones of the aureoles around granitoid intrusives l Equilibrium mineral assemblage related to Xbulk Metamorphic Facies Metamorphic Facies l Pentii Eskola (1914, 1915) Orijärvi, S. l Certain mineral pairs (e.g. anorthite + hypersthene) Finland were consistently present in rocks of appropriate l Rocks with K-feldspar + cordierite at Oslo composition, whereas the compositionally contained the compositionally equivalent pair equivalent pair (diopside + andalusite) was not biotite + muscovite at Orijärvi l If two alternative assemblages are X-equivalent, l Eskola: difference must reflect differing we must be able to relate them by a reaction physical conditions l In this case the reaction is simple: l Finnish rocks (more hydrous and lower MgSiO3 + CaAl2Si2O8 = CaMgSi2O6 + Al2SiO5 volume assemblage) equilibrated at lower En An Di Als temperatures and higher pressures than the Norwegian ones Metamorphic Facies Metamorphic Facies Oslo: Ksp + Cord l Eskola (1915) developed the concept of Orijärvi: Bi + Mu metamorphic facies: Reaction: “In any rock or metamorphic formation which has 2 KMg3AlSi 3O10(OH)2 + 6 KAl2AlSi 3O10(OH)2 + 15 SiO2 arrived at a chemical equilibrium through Bt Ms Qtz metamorphism at constant temperature and =
    [Show full text]
  • Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms
    Title 430 – National Soil Survey Handbook Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms Subpart A – General Information 629.0 Definition and Purpose This glossary provides the NCSS soil survey program, soil scientists, and natural resource specialists with landform, geologic, and related terms and their definitions to— (1) Improve soil landscape description with a standard, single source landform and geologic glossary. (2) Enhance geomorphic content and clarity of soil map unit descriptions by use of accurate, defined terms. (3) Establish consistent geomorphic term usage in soil science and the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS). (4) Provide standard geomorphic definitions for databases and soil survey technical publications. (5) Train soil scientists and related professionals in soils as landscape and geomorphic entities. 629.1 Responsibilities This glossary serves as the official NCSS reference for landform, geologic, and related terms. The staff of the National Soil Survey Center, located in Lincoln, NE, is responsible for maintaining and updating this glossary. Soil Science Division staff and NCSS participants are encouraged to propose additions and changes to the glossary for use in pedon descriptions, soil map unit descriptions, and soil survey publications. The Glossary of Geology (GG, 2005) serves as a major source for many glossary terms. The American Geologic Institute (AGI) granted the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) permission (in letters dated September 11, 1985, and September 22, 1993) to use existing definitions. Sources of, and modifications to, original definitions are explained immediately below. 629.2 Definitions A. Reference Codes Sources from which definitions were taken, whole or in part, are identified by a code (e.g., GG) following each definition.
    [Show full text]
  • Danise Et Al 2020 Gondwana Research.Docx.Pdf
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences 2020-06 Isotopic evidence for partial geochemical decoupling between a Jurassic epicontinental sea and the open ocean Danise, S http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/15995 10.1016/j.gr.2019.12.011 Gondwana Research Elsevier BV All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. Please cite as: Danise, S., Price, G.D., Alberti, M., Holland S.M. 2020 Isotopic evidence for partial geochemical decoupling between a Jurassic epicontinental sea and the open ocean. Gondwana Research, 82, 97–107. Isotopic evidence for partial geochemical decoupling between a Jurassic epicontinental sea and the open ocean Silvia Danise a,b,⁎, Gregory D. Price a, Matthias Alberti c, Steven M. Holland d a School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon PL4 8AA, UK b Dipartimento di Sicenze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Firenze, via La Pira 4, 50121 Firenze, Italy c Institut für Geowissenschaften, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Ludewig-Meyn-Straße 10, 24118 Kiel, Germany d Department of Geology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2501, USA a b s t r a c t Article history: Received 21 October 2019 Received in revised form 20 December 2019 Accepted 20 December 2019 Available online 30 January 2020 Handling Editor: A.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGY THEME STUDY Page 1
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARKS Dr. Harry A. Butowsky GEOLOGY THEME STUDY Page 1 Geology National Historic Landmark Theme Study (Draft 1990) Introduction by Dr. Harry A. Butowsky Historian, History Division National Park Service, Washington, DC The Geology National Historic Landmark Theme Study represents the second phase of the National Park Service's thematic study of the history of American science. Phase one of this study, Astronomy and Astrophysics: A National Historic Landmark Theme Study was completed in l989. Subsequent phases of the science theme study will include the disciplines of biology, chemistry, mathematics, physics and other related sciences. The Science Theme Study is being completed by the National Historic Landmarks Survey of the National Park Service in compliance with the requirements of the Historic Sites Act of l935. The Historic Sites Act established "a national policy to preserve for public use historic sites, buildings and objects of national significance for the inspiration and benefit of the American people." Under the terms of the Act, the service is required to survey, study, protect, preserve, maintain, or operate nationally significant historic buildings, sites & objects. The National Historic Landmarks Survey of the National Park Service is charged with the responsibility of identifying America's nationally significant historic property. The survey meets this obligation through a comprehensive process involving thematic study of the facets of American History. In recent years, the survey has completed National Historic Landmark theme studies on topics as diverse as the American space program, World War II in the Pacific, the US Constitution, recreation in the United States and architecture in the National Parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Survey Research 1965
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RESEARCH 1965 Chapter D GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 525-D Scientific notes and summaries of investiga- tions by members of the Conservation, Geo- logic, and Water Resources Divisions in geology, hydrology, and related fields - UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1965 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C., 20402 - Price $2 GEOLOGIC STUDIES Geochronology Page Implications of new radiometric ages in eastern Connecticut and Massachusetts, by Robert Zartman, George Snyder, T. W.Stern, R.F. Marvin,.and R.C.Bucknam-----------,------------------------------------------------ Reconna&sance of mineral ages of plutons in Elko County, Nev., and vicinity, by R. R. Coats, R. F. Marvin, and T.W.Stern---------------------------------------------------------------------i---------------------- Juragsic plutonism in the Cook Inlet region, Alaska, by R. L. Detterman, B. L. Reed, and M. A. Lanphere ------ ------ Age and distribution of sedimentary zircon as a guide to provenance, by R. S. Houston and J. F. Murphy - - - - - - - - - - - - Carboniferous isotopic age of the metamorphism of the Salmon Hornblende Schist and Abrams Mica Schist, southern Klamath Mountains, Calif.,*by M. A. Lanphere and W. P. Irwin- ------------------,-------------------------- Radiocarbon dates from lliamna Lake, Alaska, by R. L. Detterman, B. L. Reed, and Meyer Rubin
    [Show full text]
  • Sequence Stratigraphic Expression of Flexural Subsidence: Middle
    SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHIC EXPRESSION OF FLEXURAL SUBSIDENCE: MIDDLE JURASSIC TWIN CREEK LIMESTONE, WYOMING, U.S.A. by BOLTON HOWES (Under the Direction of Steve Holland) ABSTRACT In southwestern Wyoming, the Bajocian to Callovian Twin Creek Limestone records the incipient deposition on a foreland basin in the Sundance Seaway. The sequence stratigraphy of the Twin Creek Limestone is described in the Wyoming Range of southwestern Wyoming, and the geometry of the foreland basin is described mathematically based on estimates flexural rigidity of the underlying crust and the subsidence caused by a thrust load in central Idaho. Four depositional sequences are described. These sequences are correlated to the Bighorn Basin based on existing biostratigraphic correlations and descriptions of the sequence stratigraphic architecture of Middle Jurassic strata in the Bighorn Basin. Modeling of the flexural subsidence of the foreland basin indicates that to account for the geometry of the foreland basin some form of long-wavelength subsidence must be superimposed on the flexural subsidence associated with the thrust load in central Idaho. INDEX WORDS: carbonate rocks; Jurassic; foreland basin; sequence stratigraphy SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHIC EXPRESSION OF FLEXURAL SUBSIDENCE: MIDDLE JURASSIC TWIN CREEK LIMESTONE, WYOMING, U.S.A. By BOLTON HOWES B.A., Macalester College, 2015 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE ATHENS, GEORGIA 2017 © 2017 Bolton Howes All Rights Reserved SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHIC EXPRESSION OF FLEXURAL SUBSIDENCE: MIDDLE JURASSIC TWIN CREEK LIMESTONE, WYOMING, U.S.A. by BOLTON HOWES Major Professor: Steven M. Holland Committee: L. Bruce Railsback David S.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy, Structure, and Petrology of the Mt. Cube Area, New Hampshire by Jarvis B
    BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA STRATIGRAPHY, STRUCTURE, AND PETROLOGY OF THE MT. CUBE AREA, NEW HAMPSHIRE BY JARVIS B. HADLEY CONTENTS Page Abstract.................................................................................................................................. 115 Introduction.......................................................................................................................... 115 Acknowledgments................................................................................................................. 117 Stratified rocks....................................................................................................................... 117 General statement........................................................................................................ 117 Orfordville formation................................................................................................... 119 General statement................................................................................................ 119 Post Pond volcanic member............................................................................... 119 Black schist............................................................................................................ 121 Hardy Hill qu&rtzite............................................................................................ 122 Sunday Mountain volcanic member................................................................. 123 Low-grade rocks of the Orfordville
    [Show full text]