Question for Written Answer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Question for written answer E-000882/2021 to the Commission Rule 138 Juozas Olekas (S&D), Magdalena Adamowicz (PPE), István Ujhelyi (S&D), Manuel Pizarro (S&D), Andris Ameriks (S&D), Valdemar Tomaševski (ECR), Sara Cerdas (S&D), Elisabetta Gualmini (S&D), Marek Paweł Balt (S&D), Barry Andrews (Renew), Andreas Schieder (S&D), Robert Biedroń (S&D) Subject: Establishment of HERA and the outcomes of the meeting of 31 January 2021 The challenges of the current pandemic have once again shown that the EU needs a health union and a solidarity mechanism to manage health crises. In the legal package for the establishment of the European Health Union, the Commission also proposes the creation of the European Health Emergency Preparedness and Response Authority (HERA). One of the first steps in setting up this authority was a discussion on 31 January 2021 between the Commission President and industry leaders about the bio-defence preparedness initiative. This initiative should strengthen European vaccine production technologies and increase the EU’s resilience to potential new health threats. The discussion took place in a strictly limited format with several pharmaceutical industry representatives who had signed advanced purchase agreements for COVID-19 vaccines. 1. Could the Commission indicate when other actors will become involved in this process, in particular smaller European biotechnology companies and representatives of civil society? 2. Have the timetables for HERA and the bio-defence preparedness initiative, including the milestones and the role of Parliament, already been established? 3. How will the bio-defence preparedness initiative enhance the EU’s overall biological preparedness and health security? PE689.112v01-00.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Green Deal – the Coordinators
Green Deal – The Coordinators David Sassoli S&D ”I want the European Green Deal to become Europe’s hallmark. At the heart of it is our commitment to becoming the world’s first climate-neutral continent. It is also a long-term economic imperative: those who act first European Parliament and fastest will be the ones who grasp the opportunities from the ecological transition. I want Europe to be 1 February 2020 – H1 2024 the front-runner. I want Europe to be the exporter of knowledge, technologies and best practice.” — Ursula von der Leyen Lorenzo Mannelli Klaus Welle President of the European Commission Head of Cabinet Secretary General Chairs and Vice-Chairs Political Group Coordinators EPP S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe ENVI Renew Committee on Europe Dan-Ştefan Motreanu César Luena Peter Liese Jytte Guteland Nils Torvalds Silvia Sardone Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator the Environment, Public Health Greens/EFA GUE/NGL Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Food Safety Pacal Canfin Chair Bas Eickhout Anja Hazekamp Bas Eickhout Alexandr Vondra Silvia Modig Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator S&D S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe EPP ITRE Patrizia Toia Lina Gálvez Muñoz Christian Ehler Dan Nica Martina Dlabajová Paolo Borchia Committee on Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Industry, Research Renew ECR Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Energy Cristian Bușoi Europe Chair Morten Petersen Zdzisław Krasnodębski Ville Niinistö Zdzisław Krasnodębski Marisa Matias Vice-Chair Vice-Chair
[Show full text]
EU-Parlament: Ausschussvorsitzende Und Deren Stellvertreter*Innen Auf Den Konstituierenden Sitzungen Am Mittwoch, 10
EU-Parlament: Ausschussvorsitzende und deren Stellvertreter*innen Auf den konstituierenden Sitzungen am Mittwoch, 10. Juli 2019, haben die siebenundzwanzig permanenten Ausschüsse des EU-Parlaments ihre Vorsitzenden und Stellvertreter*innen gewählt. Nachfolgend die Ergebnisse (Reihenfolge analog zur Auflistung auf den Seiten des Europäischen Parlaments): Ausschuss Vorsitzender Stellvertreter Witold Jan WASZCZYKOEDKI (ECR, PL) AFET Urmas PAET (Renew, EE) David McALLISTER (EPP, DE) Auswärtige Angelegenheiten Sergei STANISHEV (S&D, BG) Željana ZOVKO (EPP, HR) Bernard GUETTA (Renew, FR) DROI Hannah NEUMANN (Greens/EFA, DE) Marie ARENA (S&D, BE) Menschenrechte Christian SAGARTZ (EPP, AT) Raphael GLUCKSMANN (S&D, FR) Nikos ANDROULAKIS (S&D, EL) SEDE Kinga GÁL (EPP, HU) Nathalie LOISEAU (RE, FR) Sicherheit und Verteidigung Özlem DEMIREL (GUE/NGL, DE) Lukas MANDL (EPP, AT) Pierrette HERZBERGER-FOFANA (Greens/EFA, DE) DEVE Norbert NEUSER (S&D, DE) Tomas TOBÉ (EPP, SE) Entwicklung Chrysoula ZACHAROPOULOU (RE, FR) Erik MARQUARDT (Greens/EFA, DE) Seite 1 14.01.2021 Jan ZAHRADIL (ECR, CZ) INTA Iuliu WINKLER (EPP, RO) Bernd LANGE (S&D, DE) Internationaler Handel Anna-Michelle ASIMAKOPOULOU (EPP, EL) Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE (RE, FR) Janusz LEWANDOWSKI (EPP, PL) BUDG Oliver CHASTEL (RE, BE) Johan VAN OVERTVELDT (ECR, BE) Haushalt Margarida MARQUES (S&D, PT) Niclas HERBST (EPP, DE) Isabel GARCÍA MUÑOZ (S&D, ES) CONT Caterina CHINNICI (S&D, IT) Monika HOHLMEIER (EPP, DE) Haushaltskontrolle Martina DLABAJOVÁ (RE, CZ) Tamás DEUTSCH (EPP, HU) Luděk NIEDERMAYER
[Show full text]
Hon. Mr President of the European Parliament, Dear David Sassoli
Hon. Mr President of the European Parliament, Dear David Sassoli, Since March, when the outbreak of COVID-19 intensified in Europe, the functioning of the European Parliament (EP) has changed dramatically, due to the sanitary measures applied. We understand the inevitability of the contingency plan, taking into account the need to prevent infection and the spread of the virus and to protect the health and lives of people. Six months later, the functioning of the EP is gradually returning to normal. However, there are services whose unavailability seriously impairs parliamentary work, namely the interpretation service. The European Union (EU) has 24 official languages and all deserve the same respect and treatment. We recognize that the number of languages available in committee meeting rooms has been increasing, but even so, more than half of the languages still have no interpretation. Multilingualism is a right enshrined in the Treaties that allows Members to express themselves in their own language. Now, that is not happening and we are concerned that the situation will continue, even taking into account the expected workflow in the commissions after these atypical six months. In this sense, we appeal, once again, to you, the President of the EP for the application of the letter and the spirit of the principle of multilingualism, finding solutions that respect this principle and that allow the use of any of the 24 official languages of the EU. The expression of each deputy in her/his own language is a priority so that there can be conditions to fully exercise the mandate for which she/he was elected and a condition of respect for the citizens who elected her/him.
[Show full text]
European Elections Why Vote? English
Europea2n E0lecti1ons9 THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT THE EUROPEAN ELECTIONS WHY VOTE? ENGLISH Latvia Results of the 25 May 2019 European elections Show 10 entries Search: Trend European Number of Percentage of Number of Political Parties compared affiliation votes votes seats with 2014 New Unity EPP 124 193 26.24 % 2 ↓ Social Democratic Party S&D 82 604 17.45 % 2 ↑ "Harmony" National Alliance "All for Latvia!" - ECR 77 591 16.40 % 2 ↑ For Fatherland and Freedom Development/For! 58 763 12.42 % 1 New Latvian Russian Union Greens/EFA 29 546 6.24 % 1 = Showing 1 to 5 of 5 entries Previous Next List of MEPs Inese Vaidere New Alliance EPP Sandra Kalniete New Alliance EPP Nils Ouchakov Social-democrat Party S&D Andris Ameriks Social-democrat Party S&D Tatjana Ždanoka Russian Union of Latvia Greens/EFA Roberts Zile National Alliance ECR Dace Melbärde National Alliance ECR Ivars Ijabs Development Renew Europe Lists for the elections on 25 May 2019 European Leading Name of party Translation Website Programme affiliation candidate Jauna Vienotība New Unity EPP Valdis vienotiba.lv Programme Dombrovskis Sociāldemokrātiskā Partija Social Democratic Party S&D Nils Ušakovs saskana.eu Programme "Saskaņa" (SDPS) "Harmony" Progresīvie The Progressives S&D Gunta Anča progresivie.lv Programme Nacionālā apvienība "Visu National Alliance "All for ECR Roberts Zile nacionalaapvieniba.lv Programme Latvijai!"-"Tēvzemei un Latvia!" - For Fatherland Brīvībai/LNNK" and Freedom Zaļo un Zemnieku Union of Greens and ALDE Dana zzs.lv Programme savienība (ZZS) Farmers
[Show full text]
17.3.2021 A9-0033/1 Amendment 1 István Ujhelyi, Cláudia Monteiro De
17.3.2021 A9-0033/1 Amendment 1 István Ujhelyi, Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar, Elena Kountoura, Johan Danielsson, Giuseppe Ferrandino, Josianne Cutajar, Isabel García Muñoz, Benoît Lutgen, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi, Rovana Plumb, Sylvie Guillaume, Vera Tax, Andreas Schieder, Andris Ameriks, Sara Cerdas, Petar Vitanov, Klára Dobrev, Attila Ara-Kovács, Maria Grapini, Dominique Riquet, Csaba Molnár, Sándor Rónai, Ismail Ertug, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Clara Aguilera, Marcos Ros Sempere, Heléne Fritzon, Victor Negrescu, Inma Rodríguez-Piñero, Alexis Georgoulis, Alfred Sant, Erik Bergkvist, Carlos Zorrinho, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, César Luena, Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Cristina Maestre Martín De Almagro, Rosa D’Amato, Evin Incir, Marc Angel, Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques, Pedro Marques, Valter Flego, Katalin Cseh, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Seán Kelly, Ignazio Corrao, Isabel Santos, Alicia Homs Ginel, Robert Hajšel, Nacho Sánchez Amor, Javi López, Alex Agius Saliba, Demetris Papadakis, Marc Tarabella, Sergei Stanishev, Paolo De Castro, Anna Júlia Donáth, Nora Mebarek, Leszek Miller, Margarida Marques, Adriana Maldonado López, Lina Gálvez Muñoz, Eva Kaili, Juozas Olekas, Isabel Carvalhais, Hannes Heide, Márton Gyöngyösi, Estrella Durá Ferrandis, Monika Beňová, Pina Picierno, Dietmar Köster, Agnes Jongerius, Miroslav Číž, Günther Sidl, Pietro Bartolo, Ibán García Del Blanco, Jytte Guteland, Mónica Silvana González Report A9-0033/2021 Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar EU strategy for sustainable tourism (2020/2038(INI))
[Show full text]
068517/EU XXVII. GP Eingelangt Am 09/07/21
068517/EU XXVII. GP Eingelangt am 09/07/21 Council of the European Union Brussels, 9 July 2021 (OR. en) 10606/21 PE-RE 9 'I/A' ITEM NOTE From: General Secretariat of the Council To: Permanent Representatives Committee/Council Subject: RESOLUTIONS and DECISIONS adopted by the European Parliament at its plenary part-session in Strasbourg from 5 to 8 July 2021 The Council is invited to take note of the following acts adopted by the European Parliament. At the above mentioned part-session, the European Parliament adopted 43 acts1 as follows : – 15 legislative acts – 28 non-legislative acts I. LEGISLATIVE ACTS A. ORDINARY LEGISLATIVE PROCEDURE First reading 1. Use of technologies for the processing of data for the purpose of combating online child sexual abuse (temporary derogation from Directive 2002/58/EC) Report: Birgit Sippel (A9-0258/2020) European Parliame nt legisla tive resolutio n P9_TA(2021)0319 2. Recognition of third countries certificates in inland navigation Report: Andris Ameriks (A9-0210/2021) European Parliame nt legisla tive resolutio n P9_TA(2021)0320 1 To consult the acts, Ctrl + click on the hyperlink (P9 reference) contained in the text concerned. You will be directed to the act as published on the European Parliament's website. 10606/21 FFF/icf 1 GIP.2 EN www.parlament.gv.at Second reading 3. Streamlining measures for the realisation of the TEN-T Report: Dominique Riquet (A9-0223/2021) European Parliame nt legisla tive resolutio n P9_TA(2021)0318 4. Internal Security Fund Report: Monika Hohlmeier (A9-0221/2021) European Parliame nt legisla tive resolutio n P9_TA(2021)0324 5.
[Show full text]
En En Amendments 1
European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Transport and Tourism 2017/0121(COD) 15.5.2020 AMENDMENTS 1 - 37 Draft recommendation for second reading Kateřina Konečná (PE650.437v01-00) Enforcement requirements and specific rules for posting drivers in the road transport sector Proposal for a decision (05112/1/2020 – C9-0106/2020 – 2017/0121(COD)) AM\1204898EN.docx PE650.724v01-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_LegRecomm PE650.724v01-00 2/28 AM\1204898EN.docx EN Amendment 1 Clotilde Armand Council position – Proposal for rejection The European Parliament rejects the Council position at first reading. Or. en Amendment 2 Andor Deli, Bogusław Liberadzki, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Petras Auštrevičius, Gheorghe Falcă, Tomasz Frankowski, Petar Vitanov, Rovana Plumb, Andrey Novakov, Maria Grapini, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Kosma Złotowski, Tomasz Piotr Poręba, Andris Ameriks, Angel Dzhambazki, Roberta Metsola, Roberts Zīle Council position Recital 11 a (new) Council position Amendment (11 a) In order to ensure efficient use of transport resources, take into account the operational realities and reduce the number of empty runs, which is an important element in achieving the objectives of the Paris agreement in relation to the reduction of CO2 emissions, a limited number of additional transport activities should be possible without triggering the posting rules. Such activities consist of operations performed during a period in the course of or following a bilateral international transport operation from the Member State of establishment and before the return journey to the Member State of establishment. Or. en AM\1204898EN.docx 3/28 PE650.724v01-00 EN Justification In order to respect the principle of non-discrimination and to ensure fair competition both within the EU and in relation to the hauliers from third countries it is necessary to allow additional activities not only during the bilateral transport operation, but also following the initial bilateral transport operation and before the return journey.
[Show full text]
The European Parliament Elections of 2019
The European Parliament Elections of 2019 Edited by Lorenzo De Sio Mark N. Franklin Luana Russo luiss university press The European Parliament Elections of 2019 Edited by Lorenzo De Sio Mark N. Franklin Luana Russo © 2019 Luiss University Press – Pola Srl All rights reserved ISBN (print) 978-88-6105-411-0 ISBN (ebook) 978-88-6105-424-0 Luiss University Press – Pola s.r.l. viale Romania, 32 00197 Roma tel. 06 85225481/431 www.luissuniversitypress.it e-mail [email protected] Graphic design: HaunagDesign Srl Layout: Livia Pierini First published in July 2019 Table of contents Introduction Understanding the European Parliament elections of 2019 luana russo, mark n. franklin, lorenzo de sio .....................................p. 9 part i − comparative overview Chapter One Much ado about nothing? The EP elections in comparative perspective davide angelucci, luca carrieri, mark n. franklin ...............................p. 15 Chapter Two Party system change in EU countries: long-term instability and cleavage restructuring vincenzo emanuele, bruno marino ........................................................p. 29 Chapter Three Spitzenkandidaten 2.0: From experiment to routine in European elections? thomas christiansen, michael shackleton ...........................................p. 43 Chapter Four Explaining the outcome. Second-order factors still matter, but with an exceptional turnout increase lorenzo de sio, luana russo, mark n. franklin ....................................p. 57 Chapter Five Impact of issues on party performance
[Show full text]
Latvia: European Expertise Matters Jaˉnis Ikstens
Latvia: EUropean expertise matters jaˉnis ikstens Latvia was one of the few EU countries that went to the polls on Saturday 25 May, although advance voting was also available for three days. According to the Central Elections Commission (CEC), there were 1,411,955 Latvians eligible to vote – a de- crease of 4% compared with 2014. A party list system is used to choose eight MEPs, and voters can express either a positive or a negative preference for each candida- te on a list that they vote for. As in all countries, there is a threshold of 5 per cent in order to access the European Parliament, although the effective threshold (due to the small number of seats) tends to be higher. Whilst national elections in Latvia di- vide the country into five electoral districts, for the European elections the whole country constitutes single electoral district. the campaign Both registered political parties and their alliances having no fewer than five-hun- dreds members are allowed to field candidate lists in European elections in Latvia. The CEC registered sixteen candidate lists representing both coalition and opposi- tion parties in the national parliament. along with parties that did not clear the elec- toral threshold in the 2018 Saeima elections, and organisations that did not parti- cipate in those elections. Electoral performance of new parties only recently elected to the Latvian national parliament were a matter of some interest during the campaign. Both the New Con- servative Party and the KPV LV party (Kam pieder valsts?, which means: Who owns the State?) mobilised their supporters by heavily criticising the government, and by accusing the political establishment of corruption and of mismanaging public ad- ministration.
[Show full text]
En En Joint Motion for a Resolution
European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting B9-0144/2021 } B9-0145/2021 } B9-0146/2021 } B9-0147/2021 } B9-0148/2021 } B9-0149/2021 } RC1 10.2.2021 JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rules 144(5) and 132(4) of the Rules of Procedure replacing the following motions: B9-0144/2021 (The Left) B9-0145/2021 (Verts/ALE) B9-0146/2021 (S&D) B9-0147/2021 (Renew) B9-0148/2021 (ECR) B9-0149/2021 (PPE) on the human rights situation in Kazakhstan (2021/2544(RSP)) Michael Gahler, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sandra Kalniete, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Miriam Lexmann, Janina Ochojska, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Tomáš Zdechovský, Vladimír Bilčík, Inese Vaidere, Vangelis Meimarakis, Michaela Šojdrová, Tomas Tobé, Christian Sagartz, Loránt Vincze, Magdalena Adamowicz, Ivan Štefanec, Eva Maydell, RC\1224524EN.docx PE689.006v01-00 } PE689.007v01-00 } PE689.008v01-00 } PE689.009v01-00 } PE689.010v01-00 } PE689.011v01-00 } RC1 EN United in diversityEN Luděk Niedermayer, Lefteris Christoforou, Jiří Pospíšil, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Stanislav Polčák, Krzysztof Hetman, Stelios Kympouropoulos, Maria Walsh, Seán Kelly, Peter Pollák, Romana Tomc, Loucas Fourlas, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan on behalf of the PPE Group Kati Piri, Isabel Santos, Andris Ameriks on behalf of the S&D Group Petras Auštrevičius, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Olivier Chastel, Vlad Gheorghe, Klemen Grošelj, Bernard Guetta, Svenja Hahn, Irena Joveva, Karin Karlsbro, Moritz Körner, Nathalie Loiseau, Javier Nart, Urmas Paet, Frédérique Ries, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Michal Šimečka, Nicolae Ştefănuță,
[Show full text]
The European Elections of May 2019
The European Elections of May 2019 Electoral systems and outcomes STUDY EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Kai Friederike Oelbermann and Friedrich Pukelsheim PE 652.037 – July 2020 EN The European Elections of May 2019 Electoral systems and outcomes This EPRS study provides an overview of the electoral systems and outcomes in the May 2019 elections to the European Parliament. It analyses the procedural details of how parties and candidates register their participation, how votes are cast, how valid votes are converted into seats, and how seats are assigned to candidates. For each Member State the paper describes the ballot structure and vote pattern used, the apportionment of seats among the Member State’s domestic parties, and the assignment of the seats of a party to its candidates. It highlights aspects that are common to all Member States and captures peculiarities that are specific to some domestic provisions. EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service AUTHOR(S) This study has been written by Kai-Friederike Oelbermann (Anhalt University of Applied Sciences) and Friedrich Pukelsheim (University of Augsburg) at the request of the Members’ Research Service, within the Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services (EPRS) of the Secretariat of the European Parliament. The authors acknowledge the useful comments made by Wilhelm Lehmann (European Parliament/European University Institute) on drafts of this paper. PUBLISHER Members' Research Service, Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services (EPRS) To contact the publisher, please e-mail [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN Manuscript finalised in June 2020. DISCLAIMER AND COPYRIGHT This document is prepared for, and addressed to, the Members and staff of the European Parliament as background material to assist them in their parliamentary work.
[Show full text]
En En Amendments 1
European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Industry, Research and Energy 2020/2071(INI) 19.5.2020 AMENDMENTS 1 - 156 Draft opinion Joëlle Mélin (PE650.634v01-00) Shortage of medicines - how to address an emerging problem (2020/2071(INI)) AM\1205469EN.docx PE652.374v01-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_NonLegOpinion PE652.374v01-00 2/76 AM\1205469EN.docx EN Amendment 1 Jutta Paulus on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group Draft opinion Recital -A (new) Draft opinion Amendment -A. whereas the problem of medicines shortages in the EU is long-standing and the number of incidents relating to medicines shortages has been growing in the EU Member States in recent years; Or. en Amendment 2 Jutta Paulus on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group Draft opinion Recital -A a (new) Draft opinion Amendment -A a. whereas the dependency on suppliers from a small number of third countries – the overwhelming majority of chemical raw and starting materials and active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) used for manufacturing of medicinal products for the EU market come from India and China – leads to the vulnerability of the EU health systems; whereas causes of most incidents relating to medicines shortages can be traced to disruption in the early stages of supply chains; Or. en Amendment 3 Jutta Paulus on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group AM\1205469EN.docx 3/76 PE652.374v01-00 EN Draft opinion Recital -A b (new) Draft opinion Amendment -A b. whereas production of chemical raw and starting materials and active pharmaceutical ingredients in the EU has been affected by the tendering system based on the criterion of lowest price, which incentivises the outsourcing of such production to third countries and therefore harming European companies with higher standards; whereas some facilities in these third countries often lack the capacity to enforce adherence to adequate standards of sustainable and ethical production of these materials and ingredients; whereas single winner tender systems are endangering the diversification of sources and leading to possible shortages; Or.
[Show full text]