Puget Salish People of Washington Cultural Background
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
LOWER ELWHA KLALLAM TRIBE Annual Regulation Commercial and Subsistence Sea Urchin Regulations S18-084 1
ELWHA FISHERIES OFFICE 760 Stratton Road (360) 457-4012 Port Angeles, WA 98363 FAX: (360) 452-4848 September 10, 2018 LOWER ELWHA KLALLAM TRIBE Annual Regulation Commercial and Subsistence Sea Urchin Regulations S18-084 1. SPECIES Red sea urchins – Mesocentrotus franciscanus Green sea urchins – Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis 2. FISHING AREAS Marine Shellfish Management and Catch Reporting Areas 20B, 22A, 23A, 23B, 23C, 23D, 25A, 25B, 25C, 25D, 25E, 26A (Lower Elwha U & A areas in that portion of 26A south and west of the southern tip of Possession Point on Whidbey Island 27A, 27B (north of an east-west line from Ayock Pt.) and 29. 3. OPEN TIMES AND AREAS All above areas are open to Commercial Urchin harvest September 11, 2018 through August 31, 2019 or until the respective treaty quotas have been reached. The sea urchin management areas are designated as follows: A) Red Sea Urchins San Juan Island Region: This area includes District 1, Northern San Juan Islands, (Marine Fish and Shellfish (MFSF) Catch Reporting Area 20B, and those waters of Area 22A north of a line projected east-west one-quarter mile north of Lime Kiln Light on San Juan Island and west of a line projected true north from Limestone Point on San Juan Island); and District 2, Southern San Juan Islands, (those waters of Area 22A south of a line projected east-west one-quarter mile north of Lime Kiln Light on San Juan Island, and Areas 23A). Admiralty Inlet: This Area includes MFSF Catch Reporting Areas 23B, 25A, and 25B Strait of Juan de Fuca Region: 1 This area includes District 3, Port Angeles (those waters of Area 23C east of a line projected true north from 123 degrees 48.3 minutes west longitude, and Area 23D); District 4, Sekiu, (those waters of Area 23C west of a line projected true north from 123 degrees 52.7 minutes west longitude); and District 5, Neah Bay, (Area 29 east of a line projected true north from Rasmussen Creek). -
North: Lummi, Nooksack, Samish, Sauk-Suiattle, Stillaguamish
Policy 7.01 Implementation Plan Region 2 North (R2N) Community Services Division (CSD) Serving the following Tribes: Lummi Nation, Nooksack Indian Tribe, Samish Indian Nation, Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe, Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians, Swinomish Tribal Community, Tulalip Tribes, & Upper Skagit Indian Tribe Biennium Timeframe: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Revised 04/2021 Annual Key Due Dates: April 1st - CSD Regional Administrators submit 7.01 Plan and Progress Reports (PPRs) to CSD HQ Coordinator. April 13th – CSD HQ Coordinator will submit Executive Summary & 7.01 PPRs to the ESA Office of Assistant Secretary for final review. April 23rd - ESA Office of the Assistant Secretary will send all 7.01 PPRs to Office of Indian Policy (OIP). 7.01 Meetings: January 17th- Cancelled due to inclement weather Next scheduled meeting April 17th, hosted by the Nooksack Indian Tribe. 07/07/20 Virtual 7.01 meeting. 10/16/20 7.01 Virtual meeting 01/15/21 7.01 Virtual 04/16/21 7.01 Virtual 07/16/21 7.01 Virtual Implementation Plan Progress Report Status Update for the Fiscal Year Goals/Objectives Activities Expected Outcome Lead Staff and Target Date Starting Last July 1 Revised 04/2021 Page 1 of 27 1. Work with tribes Lead Staff: to develop Denise Kelly 08/16/2019 North 7.01 Meeting hosted by services, local [email protected] , Tulalip Tribes agreements, and DSHS/CSD Tribal Liaison Memorandums of 10/18/2019 North 7.01 Meeting hosted by Understanding Dan Story, DSHS- Everett (MOUs) that best [email protected] meet the needs of Community Relations 01/17/2020 North 7.01 Meeting Region 2’s Administrator/CSD/ESA scheduled to be hosted by Upper Skagit American Indians. -
Comparing a Surface Collection to an Excavated Collection in the Lower Skagit River Delta at 45SK51
Central Washington University ScholarWorks@CWU All Master's Theses Master's Theses Summer 2017 Comparing a Surface Collection to an Excavated Collection in the Lower Skagit River Delta at 45SK51 Sherri M. Middleton Central Washington University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, and the Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Middleton, Sherri M., "Comparing a Surface Collection to an Excavated Collection in the Lower Skagit River Delta at 45SK51" (2017). All Master's Theses. 711. https://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/etd/711 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses at ScholarWorks@CWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@CWU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMPARING A SURFACE COLLECTION TO AN EXCAVATED COLLECTION IN THE LOWER SKAGIT RIVER DELTA AT 45SK51 ________________________________________________________________________ A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty Central Washington University ________________________________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Cultural and Environmental Resource Management _______________________________________________________________________ by Sherri Michelle Middleton June 2017 CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Graduate Studies We hereby approve the -
The Coast Salish: Connecting Art, Environment and Traditions
THE COAST SALISH: CONNECTING ART, ENVIRONMENT AND TRADITIONS Welcome to 21st Century Learning – Links to Our Collection. This online module and supplemental education guide was developed to allow access to hundreds of digitized images and lesson plans from Glenbow Museum’s collections. Our hope is to extend our vision of ‘More people, interacting with art, culture and ideas more often.’ Please visit and enjoy 21st Century Learning – The Coast Salish: Connecting Art, Environment and Traditions. 1 This educator’s package presents the traditional way of life of the Coast Salish people. The information encourages students to examine artifacts from the Glenbow Museum’s collection and connects them to other cultures, communities and environments from within Canada. Included in this guide are: Information on the Coast Salish people including high-resolution photographs artifacts, archival photographs and essays. Lesson plans including discussions for looking at primary sources, curriculum connections and lesson plans for a variety of ages and abilities. Detailed listing of vocabulary and concepts. Suggested sources for further research and other information. 2 HISTORY OF GLENBOW MUSEUM Glenbow Museum began with the remarkable vision of petroleum entrepreneur and lawyer Eric Lafferty Harvie. Mr. Harvie came into his fortune when oil was discovered in 1949 on land near Leduc and Redwater, for which he held the mineral rights. With this prosperity, he decided to pursue his favourite passion — collecting — and simultaneously return some of his good fortune back to the region that had been so generous to him. Mr. Harvie's goal was to collect the objects representing the history and culture of Western Canada as well as from around the world. -
Tribal Element
Tribal Element Three federally-recognized Indian Tribes, the Sauk-Suiattle Tribe, the Stillaguamish Tribe, and the Tulalip Tribes, occupy areas of present-day Snohomish County. These Tribes and their ancestors are a land and water based people, part of a larger group of aboriginal Tribes and First Nations known as the Coast Salish peoples, who live around the Salish Sea in what is now Washington State and the Canadian Province of British Columbia. The Coast Salish Tribes and First Nations have lived here since time immemorial, enjoying a landscape rich in natural resources. Coast Salish lifeways are tied to the natural environment of the Pacific Northwest, especially the Salish Sea. Today the Sauk-Suiattle, Stillaguamish, and the Tulalip Tribes are sovereign nations recognized by the United States government. Each Tribe has its own government with its own governing charter or constitution and set of general laws. These Tribes reserved lands in what is now Snohomish County as Indian reservation homelands. The Tribes have important historic and cultural sites both on and off their reservations. Each Tribe continues to exercise off-reservation rights reserved under treaty with the United States, including the right to fish in usual and accustomed fishing grounds and the right to hunt and gather on open and unclaimed lands. Snohomish County acknowledges the historic and present-day connection between tribal people and the land base, and recognizes each Tribe’s sovereignty. Snohomish County is committed to partnering with the Tribes to protect and preserve Tribal cultural and treaty resources, the natural environment, and sacred cultural areas. The relationship between these Tribes and Snohomish County is especially important when activities of county government, particularly land use regulation, have implications for one or more Tribes. -
Port Gamble and Jamestown S'kllalam Tribes Brief
Case: 19-35611, 02/18/2020, ID: 11599180, DktEntry: 34, Page 1 of 81 No. 19-35610, 19-35611, 19-35638 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ________________ LOWER ELWHA KLALLAM INDIAN TRIBE; JAMESTOWN S’KLALLAM TRIBE; PORT GAMBLE S’KLALLAM TRIBE, Petitioners-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, v. LUMMI NAT ION, Respondent-Appellant-Cross-Appellee SWINOMISH INDIAN TRIBAL COMMUNITY; SUQUAMISH TRIBE; STATE OF WASHINGTON; MAKAH INDIAN TRIBE; STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE; UPPER SKAGIT INDIAN TRIBE; NISQUALLY INDIAN TRIBE; TULALIP TRIBES; SQUAXIN ISLAND TRIBE; SKOKOMISH INDIAN TRIBE, Real-parties-in-interest ________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, No. 2:11-sp-00002-RSM ________________ BRIEF FOR APPELLEES-CROSS-APPELLANTS JAMESTOWN AND PORT GAMBLE S’KLALLAM TRIBES ________________ GEORGE W. HICKS, JR. LAUREN RASMUSSEN KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Counsel of Record 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW LAW OFFICES OF Washington, DC 20004 LAUREN P. RASMUSSEN (202) 389-5000 1904 Third Avenue, Suite 1030 Seattle, WA 98107 (206) 623-0900 [email protected] Counsel for Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe and Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe February 18, 2020 Case: 19-35611, 02/18/2020, ID: 11599180, DktEntry: 34, Page 2 of 81 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT The Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe and Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe are federally recognized Indian Tribes by the Secretary of the Interior. 83 Fed. Reg. 4235-02 (January 30, 2018). Accordingly, a corporate disclosure statement is not required by Rule 26.1 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Case: 19-35611, 02/18/2020, ID: 11599180, DktEntry: 34, Page 3 of 81 TABLE OF CONTENTS CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ......................................................... -
Hylebos Watershed Plan
Hylebos Watershed Plan July 2016 EarthCorps 6310 NE 74th Street, Suite 201E Seattle, WA 98115 Prepared by: Matt Schwartz, Project Manager Nelson Salisbury, Ecologist William Brosseau, Operations Director Pipo Bui, Director of Foundation and Corporate Relations Rob Anderson, Senior Project Manager Acknowledgements Support for the Hylebos Watershed Plan is provided by the Puget Sound Stewardship and Mitigation Fund, a grantmaking fund created by the Puget Soundkeeper Alliance and administered by the Rose Foundation for Communities and the Environment. Hylebos Watershed Plan- EarthCorps 2016 | 1 June 28, 2016 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 History of EarthCorps/Friends of the Hylebos ........................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Key Stakeholders ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 2 Purpose of Report- The Why ............................................................................................................................... 7 3 Goals and Process- The What and The How ................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Planning Process .................................................................................................................................................... -
Section II Community Profile
Section II: Community Profile Section II Community Profile Hazard Mitigation Plan 2010 Update 9 [this page intentionally left blank] 10 Hazard Mitigation Plan 2010 Update Section II: Community Profile Community Profile Disclaimer: The Tulalip Tribes Tribal/State Hazard Mitigation Plan covers all the people, property, infrastructure and natural environment within the exterior boundaries of the Tulalip Reservation as established by the Point Elliott Treaty of January 22, 1855 and by Executive Order of December 23, 1873, as well as any property owned by the Tulalip Tribes outside of this area. Furthermore the Plan covers the Tulalip Tribes Usual and Accustom Fishing areas (U&A) as determined by Judge Walter E. Craig in United States of America et. al., plaintiffs v. State of Washington et. al., defendant, Civil 9213 Phase I, Sub Proceeding 80-1, “In Re: Tulalip Tribes’ Request for Determination of Usual and Accustom Fishing Places.” This planning scope does not limit in any way the Tulalip Tribes’ hazard mitigation and emergency management planning concerns or influence. This section will provide detailed information on the history, geography, climate, land use, population and economy of the Tulalip Tribes and its Reservation. Tulalip Reservation History Archaeologists and historians estimate that Native Americans arrived from Siberia via the Bering Sea land bridge beginning 17,000 to 11,000 years ago in a series of migratory waves during the end of the last Ice Age. Indians in the region share a similar cultural heritage based on a life focused on the bays and rivers of Puget Sound. Throughout the Puget Sound region, While seafood was a mainstay of the native diet, cedar trees were the most important building material.there were Cedar numerous was used small to tribesbuild both that subsistedlonghouses on and salmon, large halibut,canoes. -
Battlefields & Treaties
welcome to Indian Country Take a moment, and look up from where you are right now. If you are gazing across the waters of Puget Sound, realize that Indian peoples thrived all along her shoreline in intimate balance with the natural world, long before Europeans arrived here. If Mount Rainier stands in your view, realize that Indian peoples named it “Tahoma,” long before it was “discovered” by white explorers. Every mountain that you see on the horizon, every stand of forest, every lake and river, every desert vista in eastern Washington, all of these beautiful places are part of our Indian heritage, and carry the songs of our ancestors in the wind. As we have always known, all of Washington State is Indian Country. To get a sense of our connection to these lands, you need only to look at a map of Washington. Over 75 rivers, 13 counties, and hundreds of cities and towns all bear traditional Indian names – Seattle, Tacoma, Yakima, and Spokane among them. Indian peoples guided Lewis and Clark to the Pacifi c, and pointed them safely back to the east. Indian trails became Washington’s earliest roads. Wild salmon, delicately grilled and smoked in Alderwood, has become the hallmark of Washington State cuisine. Come visit our lands, and come learn about our cultures and our peoples. Our families continue to be intimately woven into the world around us. As Tribes, we will always fi ght for preservation of our natural resources. As Tribes, we will always hold our elders and our ancestors in respect. As Tribes, we will always protect our treaty rights and sovereignty, because these are rights preserved, at great sacrifi ce, ABOUT ATNI/EDC by our ancestors. -
Chief Seattle's Speech Historylink.Org Essay 1427
Chief Seattle's Speech HistoryLink.org Essay 1427 By Walt Crowley, June 28, 1999 In addition to his namesake city, Chief Seattle (178?-1866) is best remembered for a speech given, according to pioneer Dr. Henry Smith, on the occasion of an 1854 visit to Seattle of Isaac Stevens (1818-1862). Stevens was governor and Commissioner of Indian Affairs of Washington Territory. He visited in January and again in March 1854. Chief Seattle's speech went unnoted in the written record until October 29, 1887, when the Seattle Sunday Starpublished a text reconstructed from admittedly incomplete notes by Dr. Smith. Smith rendered his memory of Chief Seattle's speech in the rather ornate (to modern ears) English of Victorian oratory. Chief Seattle would have given the speech in the Lushootseed language, which then would have been translated into Chinook Indian trade language, and then into English. Smith's text is a necessarily filtered version of the speech and was certainly embellished by him. Smith's reconstruction lacks corroboration in the written record, but it is far from implausible. Seattle was well respected among his own people and settlers as a powerful and eloquent orator in his native tongue. It is likely that he was present to meet Governor Stevens in January 1854. Stevens' assistant George Gibbs noted his presence during the March 11, 1854 meeting. Also, there are several accounts in pioneer records of Chief Seattle giving speeches to large crowds. Frederick James Grant included Smith's text in his 1891 History of Seattle, Washington and Clarence B. Bagley reprinted a slightly altered version in his 1929 History of King County, Washington(Vol. -
Indigenous History in Burnaby Resource Guide
Tsleil-Waututh community members paddling Burrard Inlet, June 18, 2014. Copyright Tsleil-Waututh Nation, Photograph by Blake Evans, 2014. Indigenous History in Burnaby Resource Guide 6501 Deer Lake Ave, Burnaby, BC V5G 3T6 | 604-297-4565 | burnabyvillagemuseum.ca 2019-06-03 The Burnaby School District is thankful to work, play and learn on the traditional territories of the hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓ and Sḵwxwú7mesẖ speaking people. As we inquire into learning more about the history of these lands, we are grateful to Burnaby Village Museum for working with our host First Nation communities. The knowledge being shared in this resource guide through our local communities supports the teaching and learning happening in our classrooms. It deepens our understanding of the history of our community and will increase our collective knowledge of our host First Nations communities’ history in Burnaby. In our schools, this guide will assist in creating place-based learning opportunities that will build pride for our Indigenous learners through the sharing of this local knowledge, but also increase understanding for our non-Indigenous learners. Through this guide, we can move closer to the Truth and Reconciliation’s Call to Action 63 (i and iii): 63. We call upon the Council of Ministers of Education, Canada to maintain an annual commitment to Indigenous education issues, including: i. Developing and implementing Kindergarten to Grade Twelve curriculum and learning resources on Indigenous peoples in Canadian history, and the history and legacy of residential schools. iii. Building student capacity for intercultural understanding, empathy, and mutual respect. We would like extend thanks to Burnaby Village Museum staff for their time and efforts in creating this resource guide. -
Barbara Lane Fc^Ido. Date: September 27, 1993 «3*Sfs' Subject: Review of Data Re: Possible Native Presence Mountain Goat Olympic National Park
Memorandum O/JLcv VJ». To: Paul Gleeson l«vu/s- fx«£»*-4'5-lz.y From: Barbara Lane fc^ido. Date: September 27, 1993 «3*SfS' Subject: Review of data re: possible native presence mountain goat Olympic National Park Enclosed is a final copy of my report "Western Washington Indian Knowledge of Mountain Goat in the Nineteenth Century: Historic, Ethnographic, and Linguistic Data". Please substitute the enclosed for the copy sent to you earlier and destroy the earlier draft. On rereading the earlier paper I discovered numerous minor typographical and editorial matters which have been corrected in the final version enclosed herewith. Also enclosed is a signed copy of the contract associated with this project. Thank you for inviting me to participate in this review. I found the subject matter stimulating. Dr. Schultz's article is a real contribution to the history of exploration in the region. WY-U3-1WM ll^l^HH hKUTI IU l.fUb-O.iUJJ'} K.tU 1 Western Washington Indian Knowlege of Mountain Goat in the Nineteenth Century : Historic, Ethnographic, and Linguistic Data Introductory remarks This commentary is written in response to a request from the National Park Service for a review of materials concerning evidence relating to presence or absence of mountain goat in the Olympic Mountains prior to introduction of this species in the 1920s. Dr. Lyman (1988) noted that the view that mountain goat were not native to the Olympic Peninsula is based on an absence of biological reports, absence of historical and ethnographic records, and lack of archaeofaunal evidence of pre-1920s presence of the species in this region.