DOCSLIB.ORG

Port Gamble and Jamestown S'kllalam Tribes Brief

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Port Gamble and Jamestown S'kllalam Tribes Brief Case: 19-35611, 02/18/2020, ID: 11599180, DktEntry: 34, Page 1 of 81 No. 19-35610, 19-35611, 19-35638 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ________________ LOWER ELWHA KLALLAM INDIAN TRIBE; JAMESTOWN S’KLALLAM TRIBE; PORT GAMBLE S’KLALLAM TRIBE, Petitioners-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, v. LUMMI NAT ION, Respondent-Appellant-Cross-Appellee SWINOMISH INDIAN TRIBAL COMMUNITY; SUQUAMISH TRIBE; STATE OF WASHINGTON; MAKAH INDIAN TRIBE; STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE; UPPER SKAGIT INDIAN TRIBE; NISQUALLY INDIAN TRIBE; TULALIP TRIBES; SQUAXIN ISLAND TRIBE; SKOKOMISH INDIAN TRIBE, Real-parties-in-interest ________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, No. 2:11-sp-00002-RSM ________________ BRIEF FOR APPELLEES-CROSS-APPELLANTS JAMESTOWN AND PORT GAMBLE S’KLALLAM TRIBES ________________ GEORGE W. HICKS, JR. LAUREN RASMUSSEN KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Counsel of Record 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW LAW OFFICES OF Washington, DC 20004 LAUREN P. RASMUSSEN (202) 389-5000 1904 Third Avenue, Suite 1030 Seattle, WA 98107 (206) 623-0900 [email protected] Counsel for Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe and Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe February 18, 2020 Case: 19-35611, 02/18/2020, ID: 11599180, DktEntry: 34, Page 2 of 81 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT The Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe and Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe are federally recognized Indian Tribes by the Secretary of the Interior. 83 Fed. Reg. 4235-02 (January 30, 2018). Accordingly, a corporate disclosure statement is not required by Rule 26.1 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Case: 19-35611, 02/18/2020, ID: 11599180, DktEntry: 34, Page 3 of 81 TABLE OF CONTENTS CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT .......................................................... i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .................................................................................... iii INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT .......................................................................... 5 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES ON CROSS-APPEAL ......................................... 5 TREATIES INVOLVED ........................................................................................... 5 RESTATEMENT OF THE CASE ............................................................................ 5 A. Background .......................................................................................... 5 1. The Boldt Decision and the Lummi U&A ................................. 6 2. The S’Klallam and Lower Elwha U&A .................................... 8 B. Lummi I, Lummi II, and Lummi III ....................................................... 8 1. Lummi I ...................................................................................... 9 2. Lummi II ................................................................................... 10 3. Lummi III .................................................................................. 12 C. Decision on Remand and This Appeal ............................................... 16 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ............................................................................... 19 S’KLALLAM ARGUMENT ON CROSS-APPEAL ............................................. 21 I. The District Court Erroneously Denied Leave to Amend the RFD ............. 21 A. There is no jurisdictional barrier to amending the RFD .................... 22 B. The proposed amended RFD states a claim under 25(a)(1) ............... 26 C. Amendment would not prejudice the Lower Elwha or the Lummi ................................................................................................ 28 Case: 19-35611, 02/18/2020, ID: 11599180, DktEntry: 34, Page 4 of 81 II. The S’Klallam Should At Least Be Permitted to File a New RFD .............. 31 III. Regardless of the Method of Proceeding, It Is Important to Determine the Western Boundary of the Lummi U&A ................................ 33 A. The western boundary of the Lummi U&A remains undefined ............................................................................................ 35 B. The boundary of the Lummi U&A is capable of precise definition ............................................................................................ 39 RESPONSE TO THE LUMMI AND LOWER ELWHA POSITIONS ................. 42 I. The Lummi’s Position Should Be Rejected ................................................. 42 II. The Lower Elwha’s Position Should Be Rejected ....................................... 53 CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................... 55 STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ADDENDUM ii Case: 19-35611, 02/18/2020, ID: 11599180, DktEntry: 34, Page 5 of 81 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Carvalho v. Equifax Info. Servs., LLC, 629 F.3d 876 (9th Cir. 2010) ...............................................................................22 DCD Programs, Ltd. v. Leighton, 833 F.2d 183 (9th Cir. 1987) ...............................................................................22 Eminence Capital, LLC v. Aspeon, Inc., 316 F.3d 1048 (9th Cir. 2003) ...................................................................... 21, 22 Gay v. Waiters’ & Dairy Lunchmen’s Union, 694 F.2d 531 (9th Cir. 1982) ...............................................................................17 Johnson v. Buckley, 356 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir. 2004) .............................................................................22 Makah Indian Tribe v. Quileute Indian Tribe, 873 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir. 2017) ................................................................ 39, 52, 54 Martin v. Wilks, 490 U.S. 755 (1989) ............................................................................................40 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe v. Lummi Indian Nation, 141 F.3d 1355 (9th Cir. 1998) .............................................................................41 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe v. Lummi Indian Nation, 234 F.3d 1099 (9th Cir. 2000) .............................................................................41 Sanford v. MemberWorks, Inc., 625 F.3d 550 (9th Cir. 2010) ...............................................................................22 Tulalip Tribes v. Suquamish Indian Tribe, 794 F.3d 1129 (9th Cir. 2015) .............................................................................50 United States v. Lummi Nation, 876 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2017) ..................................................................... passim United States v. Lummi Nation, 763 F.3d 1180 (9th Cir. 2014) ..................................................................... passim iii Case: 19-35611, 02/18/2020, ID: 11599180, DktEntry: 34, Page 6 of 81 United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, 235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000) ....................................................................... passim United States v. Washington, No. C70-9213RSM, 2019 WL 5963052 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 13, 2019) ...................................................................................................................49 United States v. Washington, 20 F. Supp. 3d 899 (W.D. Wash. 2008) .................................................. 11, 29, 40 United States v. Washington, 20 F. Supp. 3d 828 (W.D. Wash. 2007) ..............................................................37 United States v. Washington, 18 F. Supp. 3d 1172 (W.D. Wash. 1991) ...........................................................7, 8 United States v. Washington, 18 F. Supp. 3d 1123 (W.D. Wash. 1987) ..................................................... passim United States v. Washington, 626 F. Supp. 1405 (W.D. Wash. 1985) .............................................. 8, 15, 35, 40 United States v. Washington, 459 F. Supp. 1020 (W.D. Wash. 1978) ....................................................... passim United States v. Washington, 384 F. Supp. 312 (W.D. Wash. 1974).......................................................... passim Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. Suquamish Indian Tribe, 871 F.3d 844 (9th Cir. 2017) ...............................................................................49 Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. Washington, 590 F.3d 1020 (9th Cir. 2010) ................................................................ 13, 49, 50 Statute 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 ............................................................................................40 Other Authorities 1855 Treaty of Point Elliott, 12 Stat. 927 .........................................................5, 6 1855 Treaty of Point No Point, 12 Stat. 933 .............................................. 5, 6, 34 iv Case: 19-35611, 02/18/2020, ID: 11599180, DktEntry: 34, Page 7 of 81 Rules Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a) ............................................................................................21 Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 ...................................................................................................28 v Case: 19-35611, 02/18/2020, ID: 11599180, DktEntry: 34, Page 8 of 81 INTRODUCTION For generations, the Jamestown S’Klallam and Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribes have fished the waters of the Strait of Juan de Fuca, a strait off the Pacific Ocean bordered on the south by the Olympic Peninsula, site of the S’Klallam’s ancestral homes. Fishing those waters is an historic way of life for S’Klallam tribe members, as well as a source of livelihood. The importance to the S’Klallam of their continued right
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LOWER ELWHA KLALLAM TRIBE Annual Regulation Commercial and Subsistence Sea Urchin Regulations S18-084 1
    ELWHA FISHERIES OFFICE 760 Stratton Road (360) 457-4012 Port Angeles, WA 98363 FAX: (360) 452-4848 September 10, 2018 LOWER ELWHA KLALLAM TRIBE Annual Regulation Commercial and Subsistence Sea Urchin Regulations S18-084 1. SPECIES Red sea urchins – Mesocentrotus franciscanus Green sea urchins – Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis 2. FISHING AREAS Marine Shellfish Management and Catch Reporting Areas 20B, 22A, 23A, 23B, 23C, 23D, 25A, 25B, 25C, 25D, 25E, 26A (Lower Elwha U & A areas in that portion of 26A south and west of the southern tip of Possession Point on Whidbey Island 27A, 27B (north of an east-west line from Ayock Pt.) and 29. 3. OPEN TIMES AND AREAS All above areas are open to Commercial Urchin harvest September 11, 2018 through August 31, 2019 or until the respective treaty quotas have been reached. The sea urchin management areas are designated as follows: A) Red Sea Urchins San Juan Island Region: This area includes District 1, Northern San Juan Islands, (Marine Fish and Shellfish (MFSF) Catch Reporting Area 20B, and those waters of Area 22A north of a line projected east-west one-quarter mile north of Lime Kiln Light on San Juan Island and west of a line projected true north from Limestone Point on San Juan Island); and District 2, Southern San Juan Islands, (those waters of Area 22A south of a line projected east-west one-quarter mile north of Lime Kiln Light on San Juan Island, and Areas 23A). Admiralty Inlet: This Area includes MFSF Catch Reporting Areas 23B, 25A, and 25B Strait of Juan de Fuca Region: 1 This area includes District 3, Port Angeles (those waters of Area 23C east of a line projected true north from 123 degrees 48.3 minutes west longitude, and Area 23D); District 4, Sekiu, (those waters of Area 23C west of a line projected true north from 123 degrees 52.7 minutes west longitude); and District 5, Neah Bay, (Area 29 east of a line projected true north from Rasmussen Creek).
    [Show full text]
  • EVENING of NORTHWEST COASTAL ART and DANCE” Proceeds to Benefit New Tribal Arts Center
    For Immediate Release Contact: Laurie Mattson Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe 360-297-6274 [email protected] PORT GAMBLE S’KLALLAM TRIBE HOSTS “EVENING OF NORTHWEST COASTAL ART AND DANCE” Proceeds to benefit new tribal arts center Port Gamble S’Klallam Reservation (October 9, 2007)—On Saturday, October 20 at 6 p.m., the Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe will host an “Evening of Northwest Coastal Art and Dance.” This is the fifth event of its kind hosted by the Tribe. All proceeds will be set aside for a new Arts Center, which is in the early planning stages and will be built on the Port Gamble Reservation. Many regional artists have contributed works of art to be auctioned off during the event. Available pieces include: • A hand-carved canoe paddle with a butterfly art design crafted by Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribal artist Floyd Jones. • Four limited edition prints from Makah artist John Goodwin. • A handmade shawl meticulously sewn by award-winning Cree First Nations artist, Chholing Taha. • A contemporary woven tunic made in the Coastal Salish tradition, designed by Port Gamble S’Klallam tribal weaver Darlene Peters and tribal elders. • “Don’t Jump Too Soon”—an original gouache painting of a salmon after a lure by noted artist Thomas Stream, who hails from the Sun’aq Tribe of Kodiak. Event attendees will be treated to a dinner with dishes that include salmon, seafood, venison, and elk. The S’Klallam Singers and S’Klallam Youth Dancers will perform. Tickets to the “Evening of Northwest Coastal Art and Dance” are $50 per person and are available by calling 360-297-2646.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Ceded Areas in Washington State
    Blaine Lynden Sumas Fern- Nooksack Oroville Metaline dale Northport Everson Falls Lummi Nation Metaline Ione Tribal Ceded Areas Bellingham Nooksack Tribe Tonasket by Treaty or Executive Order Marcus Samish Upper Kettle Republic Falls Indian Skagit Sedro- Friday Woolley Hamilton Conconully Harbor Nation Tribe Lyman Concrete Makah Colville Anacortes Riverside Burlington Tribe Winthrop Kalispel Mount Vernon Cusick Tribe La Omak Swinomish Conner Twisp Tribe Okanogan Colville Chewelah Oak Stan- Harbor wood Confederated Lower Elwha Coupeville Darrington Sauk-Suiattle Newport Arlington Tribes Klallam Port Angeles The Tulalip Tribe Stillaguamish Nespelem Tribe Tribes Port Tribe Brewster Townsend Granite Marysville Falls Springdale Quileute Sequim Jamestown Langley Forks Pateros Tribe S'Klallam Lake Stevens Spokane Bridgeport Elmer City Deer Everett Tribe Tribe Park Mukilteo Snohomish Grand Hoh Monroe Sultan Coulee Port Mill Chelan Creek Tribe Edmonds Gold Bothell + This map does not depict + Gamble Bar tribally asserted Index Mansfield Wilbur Creston S'Klallam Tribe Woodinville traditional hunting areas. Poulsbo Suquamish Millwood Duvall Skykomish Kirk- Hartline Almira Reardan Airway Tribe land Redmond Carnation Entiat Heights Spokane Medical Bainbridge Davenport Tribal Related Boundaries Lake Island Seattle Sammamish Waterville Leavenworth Coulee City Snoqualmie Duwamish Waterway Bellevue Bremerton Port Orchard Issaquah North Cheney Harrington Quinault Renton Bend Cashmere Rockford Burien Wilson Nation
    [Show full text]
  • The Stō:Ló Is a River of Knowledge, Halq'eméylem Is a River of Stories
    Walking Backwards into the Future with Our Stories: The Stō:ló is a River of Knowledge, Halq’eméylem is a River of Stories by lolehawk Laura Buker M.A. (Education), Simon Fraser University, 1980 B.Ed., University of British Columbia, 1975 Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Curriculum Theory & Implementation Program Faculty of Education © lolehawk Laura Buker Simon Fraser University Summer 2011 All rights reserved. However, in accordance with the Copyright Act of Canada, this work may be reproduced, without authorization, under the conditions for "Fair Dealing." Therefore, limited reproduction of this work for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, review and news reporting is likely to be in accordance with the law, particularly if cited appropriately. APPROVAL Name: Laura Buker Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Title of Thesis: Walking Backwards Into the Future With Our Stories: The St6:lo is a River of Knowledge, Haq'emeylem is a River of Stories Examining Committee: Chair: Robin Brayne, Adjunct Professor Allan MacKinnon, Associate Professor Senior Supervisor Vicki Kelly, Assistant Professor Committee Member Elizabeth Phillips, Elder, St6:lo Nation Committee Member Heesoon Bai, Associate Professor Internal/External Examiner Jan Hare, University of British Columbia External Examiner Date Defended/Approved: ii Partial Copyright Licence Abstract Storytelling is the original form of education for the indigenous families along the Fraser River. These stories have informed ecological, linguistic and cultural knowledge for thousands of years. This story begins in the time of the oldest inhabitants of the Fraser Valley along the St ó:lō where the river and the indigenous peopleevolutionary share changethe same and name: transformation Stó:lō, People that of is the personal River.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of British and American Treaties with the Klallam
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR WWU Graduate School Collection WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship Fall 1977 A comparison of British and American treaties with the Klallam Daniel L. Boxberger Western Washington University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Boxberger, Daniel L., "A comparison of British and American treaties with the Klallam" (1977). WWU Graduate School Collection. 463. https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet/463 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in WWU Graduate School Collection by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MASTER’S THESIS In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master’s degree at Western Washington University, I grant to Western Washington University the non-exclusive royalty-free right to archive, reproduce, distribute, and display the thesis in any and all forms, including electronic format, via any digital library mechanisms maintained by WWU. I represent and warrant this is my original work, and does not infringe or violate any rights of others. I warrant that I have obtained written permissions from the owner of any third party copyrighted material included in these files. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of this work, including but not limited to the right to use all or part of this work in future works, such as articles or books.
    [Show full text]
  • Littleneck Beach Clallam County - New Name
    Washington State Committee on Geographic Names Proposal Summary Littleneck Beach Clallam County - New Name Township: 29N Range: 3W Section: 12 USGS Quad: Sequim Location Description: Beach, 1,600ft long. Extends 800 ft on both N and S sides of the mouth of Dean Creek, located 0.25 miles NW of Blyn. Proposal Summary: Littleneck Beach: beach; 1,600 feet long, extending 800 ft in either direction from the mouth of Dean Creek, 0.25 miles NW of Blyn; Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe named the beach for the littleneck clams that live there; Clallam County, Washington; Sec 12, T29N, R3W, Willamette Meridian; 48°1’33.38”N, 123°0’33.018”W USGS map – Sequim 1:24,000. Proposal submitted by the Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe to for a beach in Clallam County near Blyn. Site was known as "log yard" among local residents in the 1990's due to the location of a log rafting facility. The Tribe began purchasing the land in the late 1990's, and completed the restoration of the area in 2004. The beach is one of the few native colonies of littleneck clams in WA. Proponent: David Brownell Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe Cultural Resources Specialist 1033 Old Blyn Hwy Sequim, WA 98382 Proposal Received: 11/1/2017 Initial Consideration: 6/20/2018 Final Consideration: 12/7/2018 WA Committee Decision: Approved WA Board Decision: US Board Decision: Opinions: Contacted for Opinion: Clallam County Commissioners Clallam County Emergency Management City of Squim WA State Historical Society NOAA Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe Port Gamble S'Kllalam Tribe Skokomish Indian Tribe Suquamish Tribe Makah Tribe Opinions Received IN FAVOR: Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe Clallam County Sheriff's Office Janet Duncan - Jamestown S'Klallam Tribal Member Vickie Carroll - Jamestown S'Klallam Tribal Member Marlin D.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Prevention and Wellness Programs
    THE CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE COLVILLE RESERVATION • THE CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE CHEHALIS RESERVATION • COWLITZ INDIAN TRIBE • HOH TRIBE • JAMESTOWN S’KLALLAM TRIBE • KALISPEL TRIBE OF INDIANS • LOWER ELWHA KLALLAM HCA supports prevention services in the TRIBE • LUMMI NATION • MAKAH TRIBE • MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE • NISQUALLY INDIAN TRIBE • NOOKSACK INDIAN TRIBE • following communities and tribes. PORT GAMBLE S’KLALLAM TRIBE • PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS • PreventionPreventi oservicesn serv areice focuseds are f oinc ucommunitiessed in com andm uTribesnitie throughouts and Trib Washingtones throughQUILEUTEout Wa NATIONshingto •n QUINAULT INDIAN NATION • SAMISH INDIAN NATION • SAUK-SUIATTLE INDIAN TRIBE • SHOALWATER BAY TRIBE • SKOKOMISH INDIAN TRIBE • YAKAMA NATION • SPOKANE TRIBE Ferndale Nooksack Selkirk Lummi ! ! ! Mount FernWHATCOMdale ! Baker _^ Nooksack OF INDIANS • SQUAXIN ISLAND TRIBE • STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE San Juan Bellingham Republic Lummi WHATCOM ! PEND Island Upper SkagitSAN _^ OREILLE OF INDIANS • SUQUAMISH TRIBE • SWINOMISH INDIAN TRIBAL ! Samish !Concrete Bellingham OKANOGAN Republic PEND ! Sedro- OKANOGAN FERRY ^ SAN Swinomish JUAN Omak STEVENS Kalispel _ OREILLE ! Woolley SKAGIT ! JUAN Concrete ! COMMUNITY • TULALIP TRIBES • UPPER SKAGIT INDIAN TRIBE • Mt Vernon SaSauk-Suiattlemish ! Makah Oak _^ Upper _^ ! Colville Cusick ! San Juan ! FERRY STEVENS Harbor Stillaguamish Skagit SKAGIT Omak Newport YAKAMA NATION Crescent Port Townsend Darrington Kalispel CLALLAM ! ! ISLANDIsland _^ Swinomish Springdale ^ THE CONFEDERATED
    [Show full text]
  • The Strong People: a History of the Port Gamble S'klallam Tribe Now
    For Immediate Release Contact: Ginger Vaughan ([email protected]) 206-842-8922 The Strong People: A History of the Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe Now Available First book to focus on Port Gamble S’Klallam history showcases voices of elders, community members, and historians. The Strong People: A History of Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe is here! Hundreds of years of history, over four decades of interviews, and five years of curating have gone into composing this comprehensive story of the Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe. The book features historical essays, personal accounts, and photos from primary sources and was written in collaboration with S’Klallam elders, community leaders and historians. The Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe has been in the Puget Sound basin since 2400 B.C. Their history is rooted in the Pacific Northwest with evidence of an ancestral village at what is today the town of Port Gamble, Wash. Displaced from their home to make way for industry, the Port Gamble S’Klallam—through the strength, determination, and wisdom of their ancestors—have survived the challenges that have threatened their way of life. The Strong People is their story. As contributor and Tribal Elder Ron Charles wrote in the book’s introduction: “As we wrote this book, as we took time to examine our tribe’s history, it became crystal clear that today’s tribal members can look back with pride, knowing that the treaty rights we enjoy, the right to live on these beautiful lands on Port Gamble Bay, and our very right to exist as a tribe are all benefits that we possess today because of the actions taken years ago by our S’Klallam ancestors…” The Strong People covers the S’Klallam’s migration to Port Gamble Bay, their interactions with the first white settlers to the area, and how life changed after the construction of a lumber mill on their ancestral grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Ames, Kenneth M. and Herbert D.G. Maschner 1999 Peoples of BIBLIOGRAPHY the Northwest Coast: Their Archaeology and Prehistory. Thames and Hudson, London. Abbas, Rizwaan 2014 Monitoring of Bell-hole Tests at Amoss, Pamela T. 1993 Hair of the Dog: Unravelling Pre-contact Archaeological Site DhRs-1 (Marpole Midden), Vancouver, BC. Coast Salish Social Stratification. In American Indian Linguistics Report on file, British Columbia Archaeology Branch, Victoria. and Ethnography in Honor of Lawrence C. Thompson, edited by Acheson, Steven 2009 Marpole Archaeological Site (DhRs-1) Anthony Mattina and Timothy Montler, pp. 3-35. University of Management Plan—A Proposal. Report on file, British Columbia Montana Occasional Papers No. 10, Missoula. Archaeology Branch, Victoria. Andrefsky, William, Jr. 2005 Lithics: Macroscopic Approaches to Acheson, S. and S. Riley 1976 Gulf of Georgia Archaeological Analysis (2nd edition). Cambridge University Press, New York. Survey: Powell River and Sechelt Regional Districts. Report on Angelbeck, Bill 2015 Survey and Excavation of Kwoiek Creek, file, British Columbia Archaeology Branch, Victoria. British Columbia. Report in preparation by Arrowstone Acheson, S. and S. Riley 1977 An Archaeological Resource Archaeology for Kanaka Bar Indian Band, and Innergex Inventory of the Northeast Gulf of Georgia Region. Report on file, Renewable Energy, Longueuil, Québec. British Columbia Archaeology Branch, Victoria. Angelbeck, Bill and Colin Grier 2012 Anarchism and the Adachi, Ken 1976 The Enemy That Never Was. McClelland & Archaeology of Anarchic Societies: Resistance to Centralization in Stewart, Toronto, Ontario. the Coast Salish Region of the Pacific Northwest Coast. Current Anthropology 53(5):547-587. Adams, Amanda 2003 Visions Cast on Stone: A Stylistic Analysis of the Petroglyphs of Gabriola Island, B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle Participant List
    Region X Tribal TANF Institute Participant List Tiffany Adams Beverly Bennett Accountant Benefits Manager Spokane Tribal 477/TANF TANF Spokane Tribe of Indians Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe P.O. Box 100 3080 Lower Elwha Road Wellpinit, WA 99208 Port Angeles, WA 98363 Phone: 509-533-1360 Phone: 360-452-8471 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Virla Allen Bryan Blackburn Spokane Site Manager Coordinator of Operations Spokane Tribal 477/TANF South Puget Intertribal Planning Agency Spokane Tribe of Indians 3104 SE Old Olympic Highway P.O. Box 388 Shelton, WA 98584 Wellpinit, WA 99040 Phone: 360-426-3990 Phone: 509-533-1360 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Preston Boyd Rey Alvarez Program Manager Database Developer Children and Family Services, Colville Agency IT Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation Cook Inlet Tribal Council P.O. Box 150 3600 San Jeronimo Drive Nespelem, WA 99155 Anchorage, AK 99508 Phone: 509 634-2774 Phone: 907-793-3122 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Faye Brattain Marlene Andrews TANF Program Manager TANF Program Manager Social Services, Department of Human Services Workforce Development Klamath Tribe Bristol Bay Native Association 501 Chiloquin Boulevard P.O. Box 310 P.O. Box 436 Dillingham, AK 99576 Chiloquin, OR 97624 Phone: 907-842-2262 Phone: 541-783-2219 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Kurtis Barker Yvette Buckley 477-Self Sufficiency Program Director 477/TANF Program Director 477-SSP Spokane Tribal 477/TANF Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians Spokane Tribe of Indians P.O. Box 549 P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • New Royalty Crowned at S'klallam Days
    THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER OF THE PORT GAMBLE S’KLALLAM TRIBE | WWW.PGST.NSN.US | 360-297-2646 | OCT 2019 New Royalty Crowned at S’Klallam Days The 2019-2020 Port Gamble S’Klallam Court Photo by Lakeisha Rogers On Friday, September 13, during this year’s S’Klallam Days celebrations, a new Port Gamble S’Klallam Royal Court was named. Serving as 2019-2020 Royalty are Joy Joy Jones, Stan Paul, Nizhoni Price, Tyson Oliver, Faith Tom, Dakota Hayes, Hawa Tunkara, Cecil Williams-Wion, and Keelie Rogers. On Saturday, September 14, the new Royalty participated in a number of activities, including a parade on the Tribal campus (photo to the right by Karleigh Gomez). Cultural Resources Director Laura Price congratulated the new Royalty by saying, “We are always so proud of all the contestants and their desire to represent the Tribe. We look forward to an active, fun, and enriching year!” PAGE 2 | OCTOBER 2019 | PORT GAMBLE S’KLALLAM TRIBAL NEWS PGST Vision Statement Our vision is to achieve the full potential of the Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribal sovereign nation to be self-sufficient, proud, strong, healthy, educated and respected. PGST Mission Statement The mission of the Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe is to exercise sovereignty and ensure self- determination and self-sufficiency through visionary leadership. We will ensure the health, welfare and economic success of a vibrant community through education, economic development, preservation and protection of the rich culture, traditions, language, homelands, and natural resources of our Tribe. Port Gamble
    [Show full text]
  • Names, Land, and Language in Coast Salish Identity
    SSILA – Portland — January 7, 2012 Organized session: American Indian Personal Names: A Neglected Lexical Genre Traditional Personal Names in Klallam Timothy Montler (University of North Texas), Adeline Smith (Elwha Klallam Tribe), Beatrice Charles† (Elwha Klallam Tribe) [email protected] ▸ Klallam – Central Salishan, closely related to Northern Straits (Sooke, Songish, Saanich, Lummi, Samish) ▸ Names are the treasured property of families. They are given to grown children and adults in ceremonies by elders after being released by the oldest members of the family. It is always considered a great honor either to give or receive a name. ▸ Names descend bilaterally. There is a long and well documented tradition of intermarriage among the tribes, so a name associated with one place may end up established at a distant village in another tribe. ▸ Traditional Coast Salish names typically have no semantics beyond reference. They are morphologically unanalyzable and etymologically obscure. Elmendorf (1951) proposed an explanation for this. ▸ There are men’s and women’s names. A few names can be either. ▸ Native speakers can always identify a word as a name in text and usually can in isolation. Usually a name can be identified as a man’s or a woman’s. What makes personal names unique in Klallam? ▸ Phonology (1) Frequency of Klallam phonemes: Lexicon: ə ʔ a s t i n ŋ y u ɬ xʷ č c kʷ x̣ c̕ m q e qʷ k̕ʷ ŋ̕ y̕ q̕ ƛ̕ š x̣ʷ č̕ t̕ q̕ʷ w p n̕ h w̕ m̕ p̕ l k l̕ Names: ə a ʔ i t s n y m u c̕ w l x̣ ɬ c xʷ č q p š kʷ h ƛ̕ k̕ʷ m̕ e x̣ʷ k qʷ q̕ č̕ t̕ w̕ n̕ q̕ʷ p̕ y̕ l̕ ŋ ŋ̕ (2) Frequency of Saanich phonemes: Lexicon: ə s t ʔ e n i a l ŋ xʷ ɬ č kʷ q l̕ š x̣ m qʷ k̕ʷ n̕ t̕ᶿ w̕ q̕ y θ ƛ̕ t̕ x̣ʷ p ŋ̕ w m̕ q̕ʷ č̕ y̕ h p̕ u k Names: ə t l s i n a e m xʷ y t̕ᶿ x̣ ʔ q w kʷ ɬ č x̣ʷ p θ l̕ š qʷ k̕ʷ q̕ č̕ t̕ m̕ u ƛ̕ y̕ h k n̕ ŋ q̕ʷ w̕ p̕ ŋ̕ *l > y in Klallam *m > ŋ, *p > č, *y > č / #___, *w > kʷ / #___ in both languages Syllables: Unlike the Klallam lexicon where long consonant clusters are common (ɬq̕čšɬšáʔ ‘50’), syllables are easy to identify in names and are typically CV or CVC.
    [Show full text]