DOCSLIB.ORG

A Cultural Resources Assessment Survey of the G

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT SURVEY OF THE G. HARVEY ESTATES PROJECT PARCEL, GLADES COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Joseph F. Mankowski, M.A., RPA ADVANCED ARCHAEOLOGY, INC. 1126 S. Federal Hwy. #263 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33316 Phone: 954-270-6624 FAX: 954-533-0265 Email: [email protected] Prepared for: GLENN C. HARVEY AUGUST 2019 PROJECT #2019.61 AAI TECHNICAL REPORT #337 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ii LIST OF TABLES iii CONSULTANT SUMMARY 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT 3 CULTURAL SETTING 9 PREVIOUS RESEARCH 15 METHODOLOGY 17 RESULTS 23 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 28 BIBLIOGRAPHY 29 APPENDIX I. FMSF SURVEY LOG i LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. USGS map of the G. Harvey Estates project parcel. 2 Figure 2. 1907 plat map of the G. Harvey Estates project parcel. 5 Figure 3. 1948 aerial photograph of the G. Harvey Estates project parcel. 6 Figure 4. 1957 aerial photograph of the G. Harvey Estates project parcel. 7 Figure 5. Photograph view northeast at the project parcel. 8 Figure 6. Photograph view southwest at the project parcel’s southeastern boundary, the L-48 Canal, and the Herbert Hoover Dike (8GL421). 8 Figure 7. Aerial photograph (2017) of the G. Harvey Estates project parcel and shovel tests. 18 Figure 8. USGS map of the G. Harvey Estates project parcel and shovel tests. 19 Figure 9. Aerial photograph (2017) of the G. Harvey Estates project parcel’s eastern section, and shovel tests within HPZs. 20 Figure 10. Aerial photograph (2017) of the G. Harvey Estates project parcel’s mid-section, and shovel tests within HPZs. 21 Figure 11. Aerial photograph (2017) of the G. Harvey Estates project parcel’s western section, and shovel tests within HPZs. 22 Figure 12. Photograph view north at HPZ-1. 24 Figure 13. Photograph view northeast at HPZ-2 and HPZ-3. 24 Figure 14. Photograph view west at HPZ-3 and HPZ-4. 25 Figure 15. Photograph view north at HPZ-5. 25 Figure 16. Photograph view southwest at HPZ-6. 26 Figure 17. Photograph view west at HPZ-7. 26 Figure 18. Photograph view northwest at HPZ-8. 27 ii LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Previously Recorded Cultural Resources 16 Table 2. Previous Cultural Resource Investigations 16 iii CONSULTANT SUMMARY In July and August 2019, Advanced Archaeology, Inc. conducted a Cultural Resources Assessment Survey of the G. Harvey Estates project parcel for Glenn C. Harvey. The project parcel is located in Glades County (Parcel IDs: A35-38-34-A00-0060-0000, A34-38-34-A00- 0030-0000, A02-39-34-A00-0010-0000, A03-39-34-A00-0010-0000, and A04-39-34-A00-0060- 0000), at 27182 State Road East 78, Okeechobee, and is being proposed for the development of a residential housing community. The objective of this investigation was to locate and assess any prehistoric or historic cultural resources that may be present within the project boundaries, and to determine the effects upon any potential resources found. This assessment was conducted to fulfill historic resource requirements as part of the review by the State of Florida’s Division of Historical Resources (DHR Project File No.: 2018-3392), in response to Chapters 267.061 and 373.414, Florida Statutes. This assessment also was conducted in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (Public Law 89-665), as amended in 1992, and 36 C.F.R., Part 800: Protection of Historic Properties. The work and the report conform to the specifications set forth in Chapter 1A-46, Florida Administrative Code. The project parcel lies within Sections 34 and 35, Township 38 South and Range 34 East, and Sections 2, 3 and 4, Township 39 South and Range 34 East as depicted on the USGS Okeechobee NW and Okeechobee SW Quadrangle maps (Figure 1). The parcel is 214.96 hectares (531.20 acres) in size; it is an irregular polygon in shape, and is bounded by State Road 78 on its northwest side, Access Road on its northeast side, the Lake Okeechobee Rim Canal (L-48) on its southeast side, and an unnamed canal on its southwest side. Three modern structures occur within the project parcel that include two barns built in 2017 and 2018, and a prefabricated home installed in 2018. Investigations were accomplished by reviewing existing literature, maps, aerial photographs, and conducting fieldwork. A review with the Florida Master Site File (FMSF) indicated that no previously recorded cultural resources or previous cultural resource investigations occur within the project property. A pedestrian survey was conducted across the entire property, and a total of 314 shovel tests were excavated across the project parcel (Figures 7-11) at 25-meter intervals within eight High Probability Zones (HPZ 1-8), and at 100-meter intervals within a Low Probability Zone (LPZ). All shovel tests were found to be negative for cultural material. In conclusion, no prehistoric or historic cultural resources were found as a result of this Cultural Resources Assessment Survey. It is the consultant’s opinion, based on the available data that no sites regarded as being eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places occur within the project parcel. No further archaeological assessments are recommended. 1 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT The project parcel is located in Glades County (Parcel IDs: A35-38-34-A00-0060-0000, A34-38- 34-A00-0030-0000, A02-39-34-A00-0010-0000, A03-39-34-A00-0010-0000, and A04-39-34- A00-0060-0000), at 27182 State Road East 78, Okeechobee, and it lies within Sections 34 and 35, Township 38 South and Range 34 East, and Sections 2, 3 and 4, Township 39 South and Range 34 East as depicted on the USGS Okeechobee NW and Okeechobee SW Quadrangle maps (Figure 1). The parcel is 214.96 hectares (531.20 acres) in size; it is an irregular polygon in shape, and is bounded by State Road 78 on its northwest side, Access Road on its northeast side, the Lake Okeechobee Rim Canal (L-48) on its southeast side, and an unnamed canal on its southwest side. Three modern structures occur within the project parcel that include two barns built in 2017 and 2018, and a prefabricated home installed in 2018. A 1907 plat map, and aerial photographs dating to 1948 and 1957, depicts the property within a wetlands prairie, and partially within Lake Okeechobee (Figures 2-4). The aerial photographs also indicate some scattered, slightly elevated cabbage palm/oak/cypress hammocks (HPZ 2-8), and an elevated remnant linear sandbar or shoreline of Lake Okeechobee (HPZ-1). Currently, the parcel contains agricultural fields and improved pasture, and is an active cattle pasture and sod farm. The parcel primarily consists of grasslands and wetlands that are uniformly flat (Figure 5), and also contains some scattered hammocks containing oaks, palm trees, and cypress trees (Figures 12-18). The project parcel is located in the Eastern Flatwoods District, which is made up mostly of pine flatwoods, prairies, cypress domes, dunes, and mangroves. The Eastern Flatwoods District is described as “a seasonally flooded lowlands of river swamp and grassland prairies largely underlain by silty sand; a lagoonal deposit” (Brooks 1981). The property contains a wet prairie environment with interspersed prairie hammocks, which are tall high canopy clusters of, cypress trees, cabbage palms (Sabal palmetto) and Laurel Oak (Quercus laurifolia) with several other temperate and subtropical tree species and a generally open understory. Lake Okeechobee is adjacent to the project parcel, which is the largest freshwater lake in the state of Florida. It is the eighth largest natural freshwater lake among the 50 states of the United States and the second largest natural freshwater lake (the largest being Lake Michigan) contained entirely within the contiguous 48 states. Lake Okeechobee covers 730 square miles (1,900 km2), approximately half the size of the state of Rhode Island, and is exceptionally shallow for a lake of its size, with an average depth of only 9 feet (2.7 meters). The Kissimmee River, located north of Lake Okeechobee, and 3.53 km northeast of the project parcel, is the lake's primary source (Wikipedia 2019b). The project parcel contains five soil types according to the USDA Soil Survey of Glades County, Florida (USDA 2000). These soil types are defined as follows: • Hallandale fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes: This poorly drained soil is on low, broad flats and on cabbage palm hammocks. Slopes are smooth, are slightly convex or concave, and range from 0 to 2 percent. Typically, the surface layer is very dark gray fine sand 3 about 4 inches thick. The subsurface layer is dark gray fine sand to a depth of about 9 inches. The subsoil is brown fine sand to a depth of about 19 inches. The underlying material to a depth of 80 inches or more is limestone. • Gator muck, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes: This very poorly drained soil is in marshes, swamps, and wet depressions. This map unit is ponded for much of the year. Slopes are smooth and concave. They are 0 to 1 percent. Typically, the surface layer is black muck about 33 inches thick. The substratum extends to a depth of 80 inches. It is black loamy fine sand in the upper part, dark olive gray fine sandy loam in the next part, and gray fine sand in the lower part. • Boca fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes: This his poorly drained soil is in areas of cabbage palm flatwoods adjacent to sloughs, depressions, and drainageways. Slopes are smooth and are slightly convex or concave. They are 0 to 1 percent.
Recommended publications
  • Wilderness on the Edge: a History of Everglades National Park

    Wilderness on the Edge: a History of Everglades National Park

    Wilderness on the Edge: A History of Everglades National Park Robert W Blythe Chicago, Illinois 2017 Prepared under the National Park Service/Organization of American Historians cooperative agreement Table of Contents List of Figures iii Preface xi Acknowledgements xiii Abbreviations and Acronyms Used in Footnotes xv Chapter 1: The Everglades to the 1920s 1 Chapter 2: Early Conservation Efforts in the Everglades 40 Chapter 3: The Movement for a National Park in the Everglades 62 Chapter 4: The Long and Winding Road to Park Establishment 92 Chapter 5: First a Wildlife Refuge, Then a National Park 131 Chapter 6: Land Acquisition 150 Chapter 7: Developing the Park 176 Chapter 8: The Water Needs of a Wetland Park: From Establishment (1947) to Congress’s Water Guarantee (1970) 213 Chapter 9: Water Issues, 1970 to 1992: The Rise of Environmentalism and the Path to the Restudy of the C&SF Project 237 Chapter 10: Wilderness Values and Wilderness Designations 270 Chapter 11: Park Science 288 Chapter 12: Wildlife, Native Plants, and Endangered Species 309 Chapter 13: Marine Fisheries, Fisheries Management, and Florida Bay 353 Chapter 14: Control of Invasive Species and Native Pests 373 Chapter 15: Wildland Fire 398 Chapter 16: Hurricanes and Storms 416 Chapter 17: Archeological and Historic Resources 430 Chapter 18: Museum Collection and Library 449 Chapter 19: Relationships with Cultural Communities 466 Chapter 20: Interpretive and Educational Programs 492 Chapter 21: Resource and Visitor Protection 526 Chapter 22: Relationships with the Military
  • Chapter 17: Archeological and Historic Resources

    Chapter 17: Archeological and Historic Resources

    Chapter 17: Archeological and Historic Resources Everglades National Park was created primarily because of its unique flora and fauna. In the 1920s and 1930s there was some limited understanding that the park might contain significant prehistoric archeological resources, but the area had not been comprehensively surveyed. After establishment, the park’s first superintendent and the NPS regional archeologist were surprised at the number and potential importance of archeological sites. NPS investigations of the park’s archeological resources began in 1949. They continued off and on until a more comprehensive three-year survey was conducted by the NPS Southeast Archeological Center (SEAC) in the early 1980s. The park had few structures from the historic period in 1947, and none was considered of any historical significance. Although the NPS recognized the importance of the work of the Florida Federation of Women’s Clubs in establishing and maintaining Royal Palm State Park, it saw no reason to preserve any physical reminders of that work. Archeological Investigations in Everglades National Park The archeological riches of the Ten Thousand Islands area were hinted at by Ber- nard Romans, a British engineer who surveyed the Florida coast in the 1770s. Romans noted: [W]e meet with innumerable small islands and several fresh streams: the land in general is drowned mangrove swamp. On the banks of these streams we meet with some hills of rich soil, and on every one of those the evident marks of their having formerly been cultivated by the savages.812 Little additional information on sites of aboriginal occupation was available until the late nineteenth century when South Florida became more accessible and better known to outsiders.
  • Bibliography

    Bibliography

    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
  • Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site

    Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site

    University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2019 Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site Benjamin Garrett Davis University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Benjamin Garrett, "Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1570. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/1570 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOUSEHOLDS AND CHANGING USE OF SPACE AT THE TRANSITIONAL EARLY MISSISSIPPIAN AUSTIN SITE A Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology University of Mississippi by BENJAMIN GARRETT DAVIS May 2019 ABSTRACT The Austin Site (22TU549) is a village site located in Tunica County, Mississippi dating to approximately A.D. 1150-1350, along the transition from the Terminal Late Woodland to the Mississippian period. While Elizabeth Hunt’s (2017) masters thesis concluded that the ceramics at Austin emphasized a Late Woodland persistence, the architecture and use of space at the site had yet to be analyzed. This study examines this architecture and use of space over time at Austin to determine if they display evidence of increasing institutionalized inequality. This included creating a map of Austin based on John Connaway’s original excavation notes, and then analyzing this map within the temporal context of the upper Yazoo Basin.
  • A Brief History of Lake Okeechobee: a Narrative of Confict Alanna L

    A Brief History of Lake Okeechobee: a Narrative of Confict Alanna L

    A Brief History of Lake Okeechobee: A Narrative of Confict Alanna L. Lecher, Ph.D, Lynn University Abstract Lake Okeechobee is Florida’s largest lake, the largest lake in the Southeast United States, and the second largest lake contained entirely within the United States. The history of this inland sea is marked both by natural processes, and more recently human development and intervention. Adventurers can explore this behemoth of a waterway via the Lake Okeechobee Scenic Trail that enriches it, a part of the Florida National Scenic Trail. This paper synthesizes major natural and human-induced perturbations that shaped the lake and ultimately the trail that encircles it to create a narrative of Florida’s great lake. The story of Lake Okeechobee is a story of battles, frst between the land and sea, then between the lake itself and humankind. For the past few centuries Lake Okeechobee’s natural perturbations in water fow and fooding resisted the control of man, until recently when man triumphed, managing to control the fow of water in and out of the lake. Unfortunately, with this new found control a new bio- ecological threat in the form of harmful algal blooms has emerged, which again threatens the health and livelihood of South Floridians. Currently there are new eforts that seek to restore Lake Okeechobee towards a more natural state in an efort to thwart the blooms. Manuscript It’s a full moon weekend in February and runners lace up their shoes in preparation. They gather in the agricultural town of Clewiston southeast of Lake Okeechobee.
  • Draft Okeechobee Waterway Master Plan Update and Integrated

    Draft Okeechobee Waterway Master Plan Update and Integrated

    Okeechobee Waterway Project Master Plan Update DRAFT Draft Okeechobee Waterway Master Plan Update and Integrated Environmental Assessment 23 July 2018 Okeechobee Waterway Project Master Plan Update DRAFT This page intentionally left blank. Okeechobee Waterway Project Master Plan Update DRAFT Okeechobee Waterway Project Master Plan DRAFT 23 July 2018 The attached Master Plan for the Okeechobee Waterway Project is in compliance with ER 1130-2-550 Project Operations RECREATION OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE GUIDANCE AND PROCEDURES and EP 1130-2-550 Project Operations RECREATION OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE POLICIES and no further action is required. Master Plan is approved. Jason A. Kirk, P.E. Colonel, U.S. Army District Commander i Okeechobee Waterway Project Master Plan Update DRAFT [This page intentionally left blank] ii Okeechobee Waterway Project Master Plan Update DRAFT Okeechobee Waterway Master Plan Update PROPOSED FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FOR OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY MASTER PLAN UPDATE GLADES, HENDRY, MARTIN, LEE, OKEECHOBEE, AND PALM BEACH COUNTIES 1. PROPOSED ACTION: The proposed Master Plan Update documents current improvements and stewardship of natural resources in the project area. The proposed Master Plan Update includes current recreational features and land use within the project area, while also including the following additions to the Okeechobee Waterway (OWW) Project: a. Conversion of the abandoned campground at Moore Haven West to a Wildlife Management Area (WMA) with access to the Lake Okeechobee Scenic Trail (LOST) and day use area. b. Closure of the W.P. Franklin swim beach, while maintaining the picnic and fishing recreational areas with potential addition of canoe/kayak access. This would entail removing buoys and swimming signs and discontinuing sand renourishment.
  • Constructing Community and Cosmos: a Bioarchaeological Analysis of Wisconsin Effigy Mound Mortuary Practices and Mound Construction

    Constructing Community and Cosmos: a Bioarchaeological Analysis of Wisconsin Effigy Mound Mortuary Practices and Mound Construction

    CONSTRUCTING COMMUNITY AND COSMOS: A BIOARCHAEOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF WISCONSIN EFFIGY MOUND MORTUARY PRACTICES AND MOUND CONSTRUCTION By Wendy Lee Lackey-Cornelison A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILSOPHY Anthropology 2012 ABSTRACT CONSTRUCTING COMMUNITY AND COSMOS: A BIOARCHAEOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF WISCONSIN EFFIGY MOUND MORTUARY PRACTICES AND MOUND CONSTRUCTION By Wendy Lee Lackey-Cornelison This dissertation presents an analysis of the mounds, human skeletal remains, grave goods, and ritual paraphernalia interred within mounds traditionally categorized as belonging to the Wisconsin Effigy Mound Tradition. The term ‘Effigy Mound Tradition’ commonly refers to a widespread mound building and ritual phenomenon that spanned the Upper Midwest during the Late Woodland (A.D. 600-A.D. 1150). Specifically, this study explores how features of mound construction and burial may have operated in the social structure of communities participating in this panregional ceremonial movement. The study uses previously excavated skeletal material, published archaeological reports, unpublished field notes, and photographs housed at the Milwaukee Public Museum to examine the social connotations of various mound forms and mortuary ritual among Wisconsin Effigy Mound communities. The archaeological and skeletal datasets consisted of data collected from seven mound sites with an aggregate sample of 197 mounds and a minimum number of individuals of 329. The mortuary analysis in this study explores whether the patterning of human remains interred within mounds were part of a system involved with the 1) creation of collective/ corporate identity, 2) denoting individual distinction and/or social inequality, or 3) a combination of both processes occurring simultaneously within Effigy Mound communities.
  • Joint Meeting of the Hendry, Glades

    Joint Meeting of the Hendry, Glades

    JOINT MEETING OF THE HENDRY COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, GLADES COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TUESDAY, MAY 7, 2019, 6:00 p.m. OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL AUDITORIUM OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA I. INTRODUCTIONS A. Lake Okeechobee Water Level Hendry County Commissioner Karson Turner said he serves as the Chair of the Lake “O” Coalition. He said this meeting is a result of conversations in counties surrounding Lake Okeechobee. Commissioner Turner said Lake Okeechobee is known as the ‘Liquid Heart of the Everglades’. He explained that people around the lake heard that there was a movement to artificially get the lake down to 10.5 feet. This motivated the Commissioners around the lake to organize a public forum to voice their concerns and to make sure the Army Corps of Engineers and South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) heard that they want to allow science and facts to drive that conversation in regard to the levels of Lake Okeechobee. B. Introduction of Commissioners from Five Counties Commissioner Turner introduced Drew Bartlett, Executive Director of SFWMD, and Lt. Col. Jennifer Reynolds of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. He recognized Steve Layton, who is one of the Chief Aides to Congressman Brian Mast. The Commissioners from each county introduced themselves and everyone stood for the Pledge of Allegiance. Those in attendance: HENDRY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Chairman Mitchell Wills
  • East-Central Florida Pre-Columbian Wood Sculpture

    East-Central Florida Pre-Columbian Wood Sculpture

    EAST-CENTRAL FLORIDA PRE-COLUMBIAN WOOD SCULPTURE: RADIOCARBON DATING, WOOD IDENTIFICATION AND STRONTIUM ISOTOPE STUDIES Joanna Ostapkowicz, Rick J. Schulting, Ryan Wheeler, Lee Newsom, Fiona Brock, Ian Bull and Christophe Snoeck DO NOT CITE IN ANY CONTEXT WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE LEAD AUTHOR Joanna Ostapkowicz, School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, 36 Beaumont Street, Oxford, OX1 2PG ([email protected]) Rick J. Schulting, School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, 36 Beaumont Street, Oxford, OX1 2PG, UK Ryan Wheeler, Robert S. Peabody Museum of Archaeology, Andover, Mass., USA Lee Newsom, Flager College, 74 King Street, St. Augustine, FL, 32084, USA Fiona Brock, Cranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Defence Academy of the United Kingdom, Shrivenham, SN6 8LA, UK Ian Bull, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TS, UK Christophe Snoeck, Research Unit: Analytical, Environmental & Geo-Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, ESSC-WE-VUB, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium 1 Introduction Florida’s wetlands have yielded a wealth of prehistoric wood sculpture, from the remarkable site of Key Marco, excavated in 1896 by Frank Hamilton Cushing and yielding some of the finest wood carvings known from the Americas, to over 100 carvings recovered from Fort Center, to the bird effigies at Belle Glade, among many others (Purdy 1991; Sears 1982; Schwehm 1983; Wheeler 1996). Most of these sites are concentrated in the eastern and southern part of the state, with a chronology spanning from as early as AD 400 through the earliest era of European contact, and encompassing various archaeological cultures (e.g. St. Johns, Glades, and Belle Glade).
  • Paleoethnobotanical Investigations at Fort Center (8GL13), Florida

    Paleoethnobotanical Investigations at Fort Center (8GL13), Florida

    Paleoethnobotanical Investigations at Fort Center (8GL13), Florida Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Hannah Ruth Morris, B.A. Graduate Program in Anthropology The Ohio State University 2012 Thesis Committee Kristen J. Gremillion, Advisor Victor D. Thompson, Advisor Julie Field Copyright by Hannah R. Morris 2012 Abstract Archaeologists have long been interested in the emergence and development of social complexity. Traditional progressive theories of cultural evolution link socio-political complexity with agriculture. Recent research on groups called complex hunter-gatherers provides support for the idea that agriculture is not necessary for social complexity. This topic is addressed by examining plant use at Fort Center, an archaeological site in Southwestern Florida. Fort Center was first occupied around cal. 750 B.C., and earlier researchers proposed that the prehistoric inhabitants of the site cultivated maize (see Sears 1982). This thesis addresses the use of plants, including maize, at the site. The results of the macrobotanical analysis of samples from 2010 excavations do not support earlier claims that maize was cultivated during the prehistoric occupation of Fort Center. These results have implications for the way we view complex hunter- gatherers in North America. ii Dedication I would like to dedicate this thesis to my families, by blood, choice, and circumstance. To my first family – Pop, Mom, Aura, Sara, Brannen, Chelsea, Megan, Angie, and Josh – without you I would have never made it through this thesis. To my AMNH family – I would not be where I am without your inspiration, guidance, and advice.
  • Investigating the Late Woodland Climate of Old Tampa Bay, Florida

    Investigating the Late Woodland Climate of Old Tampa Bay, Florida

    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2019 Investigating The Late Woodland Climate Of Old Tampa Bay, Florida Jaime Rogers University of Central Florida Part of the Biological and Physical Anthropology Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Rogers, Jaime, "Investigating The Late Woodland Climate Of Old Tampa Bay, Florida" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 6685. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/6685 INVESTIGATING THE LATE WOODLAND CLIMATE OF OLD TAMPA BAY, FLORIDA by JAIME AUSTIN ROGERS B.S. University of Central Florida, 2015 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Anthropology in the College of Sciences at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2019 ` ABSTRACT Tampa Bay and the broader Central Gulf Coast region of Florida bear evidence of site reduction and population decline during the onset of the Late Woodland period (AD 500-1000). Concomitantly, Weeden Island culture flourished to the north, while climatic instability loomed to the south. It is unclear if the site abandonments in the area between the two are related to social or cultural change, an unstable climate, or a combination thereof. Interdisciplinary research has provided evidence for climate change and sea level regression during the sixth and seventh centuries in Southwest Florida, but these variables have yet to be investigated in Tampa Bay.
  • Florida Realtors Water Quality Report 2018

    Florida Realtors Water Quality Report 2018

    WATER QU LITY ISSUES OVERVIEW & ADVOCACY EFFORTS Presented by Florida Realtors® Water Quality Issue Brief lorida is experiencing a water crisis. Stakeholders F are asking, “How do the state and federal government manage the nation’s largest environmental restoration project? What is needed to help prevent excessive amounts of nutrients, such as nitrogen, from polluting two large estuaries on the east and west sides of Lake Okeechobee?” The answers are complicated and complex. To understand today, we must look to the past Florida’s water system stretches from Orlando to the north, to Florida “The miracle of the Bay to the south. In the early 1900s, the areas south of Lake Okeechobee light pours over the became known for fertile soil that was ideal for farming. These lands would flood during the wet season and dry out during the dry season. green and brown They were some of the most fertile farming lands in the world. expanse of sawgrass In what is now known as the Everglades Agriculture Area (EAA), state and of water, shining and federal government collaborated to create complex drainage and and slow-moving water movement structures. These structures were necessary to make sure that the towns forming around farmlands are safe from potentially below, the grass and dangerous flooding from Lake Okeechobee. A dam was constructed in water that is the 1915 to help with flood control. This human-made levee consisted of mud Prior to the construction of various meaning and the water management structures, the central fact of the lands south of Lake Okeechobee were prone to significant flooding.