The History of the First Sergeant

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The History of the First Sergeant The History of the First Sergeant by SGM Bryan A. Pinkney Student # 117 SGM Schell- MOl 28 Feb 05 -------_.._._-------------------­ ------- --------------------------------- I. Introduction: A. References: A History ofthe NCO Corps ofthe U.S. Anny(ERNEST F. FISHER, JR), Online Websites: Squad Leader.com and First Sergeant.com B. The purpose ofmy research was to learn about when the First Sergeant was established and the importance ofthe position. In this research I determined that the position of the First Sergeant is the lifeblood ofa unit. II. Body: During this briefing I will discuss the following: A. How was the position of the First Sergeant established; I will cover information on how the U.S. Anny got the idea from Baron Von Steuben. B. Duties and Responsibilities of a First Sergeant; I will inform you on the duties and responsibilities ofa First Sergeant; past and present. C. The importance ofthe First Sergeant; I will brief you on; it is the First Sergeant at whom all unit operations merge. D. I will cover how prestigious the position ofFirst Sergeant has become. III. Conclusion: First Sergeants have enormous responsibilities; someone just waiting to check the block for promotion cannot fill this position. Being the first Sergeant requires dedication, competence and commitment. BRYAN A. PINKNEY SGM, USA 2 ~---~------------- The role ofthe First Sergeant has been an ever-changing one. This paper will explore and highlight some ofthe more significant events in the History ofthe First Sergeant. As the role ofthe Army has evolved so has the role ofthe First Sergeant. This ever-developing role has morphed into that of not only one that maintains the formations, but that of a leader of units. While officers may command units, First Sergeants run them. It is this daily leadership that places First Sergeants at the forefront ofleadership. There is no doubt that the First Sergeant has come from a long and distinguished linage. It was the work and efforts ofsome ofthe best soldiers of our past that developed a First Sergeant that is truly peerless. When one looks at the armies of the world and studies the First Sergeants Responsibilities you can see with ease how the First Sergeant truly earns the title as "TOP ". The following passages will look at four major areas for understanding the First Sergeant History and what enormous responsibilities the First Sergeant has. This paper will examine the History of the First Sergeant, The importance ofthe First Sergeant, Duties and Responsibilities and the Day in the Life of a First Sergeant. Prior to Roman times the military world ofthe private was plunged in darkness. First Sergeants didn't exist and chaos and discipline ruled. However, by 16 B.c. the Roman Army Under Emperor Augustus created the logical position, the right arm of the centurion or company Commander. They called the soldier who held this position the signifier or standard-bearer. He Was responsible not only for guarding and caring for the Verillium or guidon, but also for the Administration ofthe company. The signifier wore lion or bearskins over their armor, to Highlight the importance of their position. Thanks to the signifier, the Roman Army moved from success to success until, like all empires, the Romans grew lazy and were conquered by there neighbors. 3 Once again, the world ofthe private soldier grew shadowy as the dark ages rolled over the known world and the first sergeant was forgotten. Then, in 1630, Gustavus Adolphus became King ofSweden and joined the 30-year War raging in Central Europe. He swiftly reorganized his army and gave authority and responsibility back to the NCO, especially to the senior NCO in each company. He also introduced standard uniforms and badges ofrank that allowed the senior sergeant or first sergeant to stand out as he had done in Roman times. Seeing how good the Swedish army was, others rushed to copy it and to the great joy ofprivates in all successful armies the position of first sergeant endures to this day. (This history can be found at Squad Leader.com). As is clearly demonstrated in the passage above, the Armed Forces cannot operate without First Sergeants. In setting up the American Army, General Washington relied heavily on the talents of General Baron Von Steuben. During this time, Von Steuben wrote what is referred to as the "Blue Book of Regulations". This "Blue Book" covered most ofthe organizational, administrative, and disciplinary details necessary to operate the Continental Army. While Von Steuben outlined the duties of such NCOs as the Sergeant Major, Quartermaster Sergeant and other key NCO's, it was the Company First Sergeant, the American equivalent ofthe Pruss ian Feldwebel(Mother ofthe Company), that he directed most ofhis attention. While directing most ofhis attention to the Duties ofa First Sergeant, he took the duties of a Prussian Feldwebel(Company Sgt) from the 17th century Prussian Army. We will discuss the duties ofa Prussian Feldwebel and see the similarities of Today's First Sergeant. This noncommissioned officer was chosen by the officers ofthe company, (Rank did not matter they chose who they felt was the best man for the job, They regarded patience and sobriety as vital characteristics). The conduct ofthe troops, their exactness in obeying orders and 4 the regularity of their manners, would "in large measure, depend upon the (Company Sergeant's) First Sergeant's vigilance." Standing at the top of the noncommissioned hierarchy ofrank, they were the "Overseers" ofthe company's enlisted soldiers. To this end, they kept the Hauptman, or Company Commander, informed of everything that went on in the company; whether NCOs were performing their duties in a satisfactory manner, that training was properly accomplished, and finally, at the end ofa busy day, all soldiers were accounted for in their quarters. They were the only noncommissioned officers allowed to strike a soldier. An especially disorderly soldier could be given three or four blows, with the Feldwebel's cane. (Now this type ofbehavior cannot be tolerated in today's Army, so this duty is not for Today's First sergeant) They were forbidden to flog a soldier, and the Feldwebel who overstepped his authority in this manner could themselves be punished. Moreover, they were to see that none ofthe NCOs beat their soldiers." Their tasks ofmaintaining the duty roster in an equitable manner, taking daily orders in a book and showing them to their officers, making the morning report to the captain of the state ofthe company in the form prescribed, and at the same time, acquainting them with anything material that may have happened in the company since the preceding report," all closely resembled the duties of the 17th century company sergeant. (http://usmilitary.about.com) The First Sergeant also kept a company Leaders book under the captain's supervision. These Leader books listed the names, ages, heights, places of birth, and prior occupations of all soldiers in the company. The Army maintained the books until about the first decade ofthe 20th century when the "Morning Report" finally replaced them. Since the First Sergeant was responsible for the entire company, he was, in Von Steuben's words, "not to go on duty, unless with the whole company, but is to be in camp quarters to answer any call that may be made". On the march or on the battlefield, they were "Never to lead a platoon or section, but 5 always to be a file-closer in the fonnation ofthe company, their duty being in the company like the adjutant's in the regiment For any First Sergeant who has received a telephone call at 0230 from the military Police or marched at the rear ofthe Squadron Mass, there may be reason to believe that little has changed since Von Steuben. But there has been significant changes since Von Steuben, On 16 June 1942, the Pay Readjustment Act established a new enlisted grade system, making the first sergeant equal to a master sergeant.(Squad Leader.com) The first sergeant and master sergeant shared honors as the senior NCOs oftheir day. Company commanders still appointed and dismissed first sergeants, but first sergeants now equaled a battalion or regimental sergeant major in rank. In addition, the greater number of NCOs in the company also added to the first sergeant's prestige. The new regulations stated that the first sergeant was to be chosen from the first line sergeants, not supply, mess, or motor sergeants. The regulations made it clear that the first sergeant would be chosen for his ability to lead men. This emphasis on leadership in subsequent regulations continued in Anny Regulation 600-201, dated 20 June 1956, which established the NCO as an enlisted commander of troops. It set principles and criteria for the identification, development and recognition ofthe prerogative and privileges to be accorded NCOs. A soldier's promotion was now recognized Anny-wide, not just in his regiment. The custom that the "stripes stayed with the unit" passed into oblivion. For the first time, the company commander lost his ability to appoint and dismiss first sergeants on his or her own initiative.(squad leader. com) The 1950 NCO handbook described the first sergeant's role as the maintainer of the continuity. This NCO guidebook also stated that the first sergeant "issues his orders through the platoon sergeants and others in the chain ofcommand. He does not deal directly with the men in platoons except in emergencies." This was a change for first sergeants. There were several 6 reasons for distancing the first sergeant from his men. While the basic nature ofthe first sergeant's duties changed little with time, the structure ofthe company and the requirements to administer the company grew.
Recommended publications
  • Enlisted Paths of Progression Chart
    Updated 2/24/17 Enlisted Paths of Progression Enlisted Army Marine Corps Navy Coast Guard Air Force Level Rank Occupation Rank Rank Rank Rank Skill Level E-1 Private (PV1) Skill level 10 Private (PVT) Seaman Recruit (SR) Seaman Recruit Airman Basic (AB) Seaman Recruit (SR) (SR) Fireman Recruit (FR) Airman Recruit (AR) Construction Recruit (CR) Hospital Recruit (HR) E-2 Private (PV2) Skill level 10 Private First Class Seaman Apprentice (SA) Seaman Apprentice Airman (Amn) (PFC) Seaman Apprentice (SA) (SA) Hospital Apprentice (HA) Fireman Apprentice (FA) Airman Apprentice (AA) Construction Apprentice (CA) E-3 Private First Class Skill level 10 Lance Corporal (LCpl) Seaman (SN) Seaman (SN) Airman First Class (PFC) Seaman (SN) (A1C) Hospitalman (HN) Fireman (FN) Airman (AN) Constructionman (CN) E-4 Corporal (CPL) Skill level 10 Corporal (Cpl) Petty Officer Third Class Petty Officer Third Senior Airman or (PO3) Class (PO3) (SRA) Specialist (SPC) E-5 Sergeant (SGT) Skill level 20 Sergeant (Sgt) Petty Office Second Class Petty Office Second Staff Sergeant (PO2) Class (PO2) (SSgt) E-6 Staff Sergeant Skill level 30 Staff Sergeant (SSgt) Petty Officer First Class (PO1) Petty Officer First Technical Sergeant (SSG) Class (PO1) (TSgt) E-7 Sergeant First Class Skill level 40 Gunnery Sergeant Chief Petty Officer (CPO) Chief Petty Officer Master Sergeant (SFC) (GySgt) (CPO) (MSgt) E-8 Master Sergeant Skill level 50 Master Sergeant Senior Chief Petty Officer Senior Chief Petty Senior Master (MSG) (MSgt) (SCPO) Officer (SCPO) Sergeant (SMSgt) or or First Sergeant (1SG) First Sergeant (1stSgt) E-9 Sergeant Major Skill level 50 Master Gunnery Master Chief Petty Officer Master Chief Petty Chief Master (SGM) Sergeant (MGySgt) (MCPO) Officer (MCPO) Sergeant (CMSgt) or Skill level 60* or Command Sergeant (*For some fields, Sergeant Major Major (CSM) not all.) (SgtMaj) .
    [Show full text]
  • Comparable Grades * April 2020
    DoD2B 7000.14-R Financial Management Regulation Volume 7A, Comparable Grades * April 2020 VOLUME 7A, “COMPARABLE GRADES” SUMMARY OF MAJOR CHANGES All changes are denoted by blue font. Substantive revisions are denoted by an asterisk (*) symbol preceding the section, paragraph, table, or figure that includes the revision. Unless otherwise noted, chapters referenced are contained in this volume. Hyperlinks are denoted by bold, italic, blue, and underlined font. The previous version dated April 2018 is archived. PARAGRAPH EXPLANATION OF CHANGE/REVISION PURPOSE Added the Coast Guard and a note to the “Comparable All Addition Grades.” Added a note acknowledging the establishment of U.S. Space Force as the sixth branch of the armed forces and All Addition explaining the chapter will be updated as soon as the U.S. Space Force information is available. CG-1 DoD2B 7000.14-R Financial Management Regulation Volume 7A, Comparable Grades * April 2020 Comparable Grades Pay Grade Army Navy/Coast Guard Marine Corps Air Force O-10 General Admiral General General O-9 Lieutenant General Vice Admiral Lieutenant General Lieutenant General O-8 Major General Rear Admiral (UH) Major General Major General O-7 Brigadier General Rear Admiral (LH) Brigadier General Brigadier General O-6 Colonel Captain Colonel Colonel O-5 Lieutenant Colonel Commander Lieutenant Colonel Lieutenant Colonel O-4 Major Lieutenant Major Major Commander O-3 Captain Lieutenant Captain Captain O-2 1st Lieutenant Lieutenant (JG) 1st Lieutenant 1st Lieutenant O-1 2nd Lieutenant Ensign 2nd Lieutenant
    [Show full text]
  • The Squad Leader Makes the Difference
    The Squad Leader Makes the Difference Readings on Combat at the Squad Level Volume I Lieutenant M.M. Obalde and Lieutenant A.M. Otero United States Marine Corps Marine Corps Warfighting Lab Marine Corps Combat Development Command Quantico, Virginia 22134 August 1998 1 United States Marine Corps Marine Corps Warfighting Lab Marine Corps Combat Development Command Quantico, Virginia 22134 May 1998 FOREWORD In combat, the actions of individual leaders affect the outcome of the entire battle. Squad leaders make decisions and take actions which can affect the operational and strategic levels of war. Well-trained squad leaders play an important role as combat decisionmakers on the battlefield. Leaders who show initiative, judgment, and courage will achieve decisive results not only at the squad level, but in the broader context of the battle. Without competent squad leaders, capable of carrying out a commander’s intent, even the best plans are doomed to failure. This publication illustrates how bold, imaginative squad leaders impact the outcome of a battle or campaign. The historical examples here represent some of the cases in which squad leaders were able to change the course of history. In each case, the squad leader had to make a quick decision without direct orders, act independently, and accept responsibility for the results. Short lessons are presented at the end of each story. These lessons should help you realize how important your decisions are to your Marines and your commander. In combat, you must think beyond the squad level. You must develop opportunities for your commander to exploit. Your every action must support your commander’s intent.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Ranks
    WHO WILL SERVE? EDUCATION, LABOR MARKETS, AND MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY by Lindsay P. Cohn Department of Political Science Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Peter D. Feaver, Supervisor ___________________________ David Soskice ___________________________ Christopher Gelpi ___________________________ Tim Büthe ___________________________ Alexander B. Downes Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science in the Graduate School of Duke University 2007 ABSTRACT WHO WILL SERVE? EDUCATION, LABOR MARKETS, AND MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY by Lindsay P. Cohn Department of Political Science Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Peter D. Feaver, Supervisor ___________________________ David Soskice ___________________________ Christopher Gelpi ___________________________ Tim Büthe ___________________________ Alexander B. Downes An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science in the Graduate School of Duke University 2007 Copyright by Lindsay P. Cohn 2007 Abstract Contemporary militaries depend on volunteer soldiers capable of dealing with advanced technology and complex missions. An important factor in the successful recruiting, retention, and employment of quality personnel is the set of personnel policies which a military has in place. It might be assumed that military policies on personnel derive solely from the functional necessities of the organization’s mission, given that the stakes of military effectiveness are generally very high. Unless the survival of the state is in jeopardy, however, it will seek to limit defense costs, which may entail cutting into effectiveness. How a state chooses to make the tradeoffs between effectiveness and economy will be subject to influences other than military necessity.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Military
    Israel’s Military: Emotions, Violence, and the Limits of Dissent Submitted in partial fulfilment for the requirement of the degree of Ph.D. Sorana-Cristina Jude Department of International Politics Aberystwyth University Wales September 2017 Word Count Thesis: 76, 351 Declaration This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree. Candidate name: Sorana-Cristina Jude Signature Date 15. 12. 2017 STATEMENT 1 This thesis is the result of my own investigations, except where otherwise stated. Where *correction services have been used, the extent and nature of the correction is clearly marked in a footnote(s). Other sources are acknowledged by footnotes giving explicit references. A bibliography is appended. Signature Date 15. 12. 2017 [*this refers to the extent to which the text has been corrected by others] STATEMENT 2 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter- library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signature Date I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loan after the expiry of the bar on access, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signature Date 15. 12. 2017 Summary The thesis contributes to the feminist and critical engagements with the Israeli military and its violent behaviour against Palestinian civilians. Intrigued by the public, military, and political reluctance to condemn the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) for their individual and collective violence against Palestinians, this research presents the artificial and multifaceted construction of a professional, non-threatening, and humanitarian military subjectivity as a material and symbolic figure that constrains local and international dissent against the Israeli military.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Abbreviations
    Army Abbreviations Abbreviation Rank Descripiton 1LT FIRST LIEUTENANT 1SG FIRST SERGEANT 1ST BGLR FIRST BUGLER 1ST COOK FIRST COOK 1ST CORP FIRST CORPORAL 1ST LEADER FIRST LEADER 1ST LIEUT FIRST LIEUTENANT 1ST LIEUT ADC FIRST LIEUTENANT AIDE-DE-CAMP 1ST LIEUT ADJT FIRST LIEUTENANT ADJUTANT 1ST LIEUT ASST SURG FIRST LIEUTENANT ASSISTANT SURGEON 1ST LIEUT BN ADJT FIRST LIEUTENANT BATTALION ADJUTANT 1ST LIEUT REGTL QTR FIRST LIEUTENANT REGIMENTAL QUARTERMASTER 1ST LT FIRST LIEUTENANT 1ST MUS FIRST MUSICIAN 1ST OFFICER FIRST OFFICER 1ST SERG FIRST SERGEANT 1ST SGT FIRST SERGEANT 2 CL PVT SECOND CLASS PRIVATE 2 CL SPEC SECOND CLASS SPECIALIST 2D CORP SECOND CORPORAL 2D LIEUT SECOND LIEUTENANT 2D SERG SECOND SERGEANT 2LT SECOND LIEUTENANT 2ND LT SECOND LIEUTENANT 3 CL SPEC THIRD CLASS SPECIALIST 3D CORP THIRD CORPORAL 3D LIEUT THIRD LIEUTENANT 3D SERG THIRD SERGEANT 3RD OFFICER THIRD OFFICER 4 CL SPEC FOURTH CLASS SPECIALIST 4 CORP FOURTH CORPORAL 5 CL SPEC FIFTH CLASS SPECIALIST 6 CL SPEC SIXTH CLASS SPECIALIST ACTG HOSP STEW ACTING HOSPITAL STEWARD ADC AIDE-DE-CAMP ADJT ADJUTANT ARMORER ARMORER ART ARTIF ARTILLERY ARTIFICER ARTIF ARTIFICER ASST BAND LDR ASSISTANT BAND LEADER ASST ENGR CAC ASSISTANT ENGINEER ASST QTR MR ASSISTANT QUARTERMASTER ASST STEWARD ASSISTANT STEWARD ASST SURG ASSISTANT SURGEON AUX 1 CL SPEC AUXILARY 1ST CLASS SPECIALIST AVN CADET AVIATION CADET BAND CORP BAND CORPORAL BAND LDR BAND LEADER BAND SERG BAND SERGEANT BG BRIGADIER GENERAL BGLR BUGLER BGLR 1 CL BUGLER 1ST CLASS BLKSMITH BLACKSMITH BN COOK BATTALION COOK BN
    [Show full text]
  • Senate the Senate Met at 9:30 A.M
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 109 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 151 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2005 No. 149 Senate The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was appoint the Honorable JOHN E. SUNUNU, a JORDAN BOMBINGS called to order by the Honorable JOHN Senator from the State of New Hampshire, Mr. FRIST. Mr. President, yesterday E. SUNUNU, a Senator from the State of to perform the duties of the Chair. the world received the sobering news New Hampshire. TED STEVENS, President pro tempore. that a series of three explosions struck PRAYER Mr. SUNUNU thereupon assumed the Jordan’s capital city of Amman. At The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- chair as Acting President pro tempore. least 57 innocent civilians were killed in the immediate blast, and well over fered the following prayer: f Let us pray. 100 were wounded. Eternal Spirit, fountain of wisdom, RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY In an apparently coordinated attack, reveal to us the path that leads to the LEADER terrorists targeted three large hotels fulfillment of Your will. Illuminate the The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- that are frequented by Americans. In- minds of our Senators that they will pore. The majority leader is recog- deed, when I traveled to Jordan, I accomplish Your purposes. Thwart the nized. stayed at one of those hotels, as many plans of the enemies of peace. in this body have in the past. One of As Veterans Day approaches, we ask f the blasts occurred during a wedding You to give wisdom to our military SCHEDULE party of over 300 guests.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum of Instruction for the 2021 Enlisted Promotion System (EPS)
    DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NATIONAL GUARD OF KANSAS LAND COMPONENT, JOINT FORCES HEADQUARTERS KANSAS 2722 SOUTHWEST TOPEKA BOULEVARD ` TOPEKA, KS 66611-1287 NGKS-PEZ 18 June 2020 MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT: Memorandum of Instruction for the 2021 Enlisted Promotion System (EPS) 1. References: a. AR 600-8-19, Enlisted Promotions and Reductions, 16 May 2019 b. NGR 600-200 Enlisted Personnel Management, 31 July 2009 c. NGR 600-5 The Active Guard Reserve (AGR) Program Title 32, Full Time National Guard Duty (FTNGD) Management, 21 September 2015 d. ARNG-HRH, PPOM #12-057 Statewide Vacancy Announcement (SWVA) Procedures, 24 July 2012 e. ARNG-HRH PPOM #20-008 New Implementation Guidance for the ARNG Enlisted Promotion System Selection from the Promotion List, 6 March 2020 f. ARNG-HRH PPOM #20-010 Consolidated Exceptional to Policy Concerning Army National Guard (ARNG) Enlisted Promotions During the Coronavirus (COVID) Outbreak, 28 March 2020 g. KSARNG Request To Fill Vacant Army AGR Positions – HRO Policy #2, 10 December 2019 h. KSARNG 600-200-1 Kansas Army National Guard Enlisted Career Management Program (ECMP), 09 February 2018 2. The purpose of this MOI with annexes is to provide instructions for the preparation and execution of the Enlisted Promotion System (EPS). Due to the complexity of EPS, it is strongly recommended that Soldiers, commanders, and staff review the information contained in this MOI and the cited references in its entirety in order to successfully complete all necessary requirements for NCO promotions. 3. The EPS is designed to fill authorized vacancies in the NCO ranks with the best- qualified Soldiers who have demonstrated the potential to serve in the next higher rank.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Ranks Chart
    Branch and Rank Description Army Navy / Coast Guard Air Force Marines Rank Code E01 Private (PV1) Seaman Recruit (SR) Airman Basic (AB) Private (PVT) E02 Private (PV2) Seaman Apprentice (SA) Airman (Amn) Private First Class (PFC) E03 Private First Class (PFC) Seaman (SN) Airman First Class (A1C) Lance Corporal (LCpl) Corporal (CPL) E04 Petty Officer Third Class (PO3) Senior Airman (SrA) Corporal (Cpl) Specialist (SPC) E05 Sergeant (SGT) Petty Officer Second Class (PO2) Staff Sergeant (SSgt) Sergeant (Sgt) E06 Staff Sergeant (SSG) Petty Officer First Class (PO1) Technical Sergeant (TSgt) Staff Sergeant (SSgt) Master Sergeant (MSgt) Enlisted E07 Sergeant First Class (SFC) Chief Petty Officer (CPO) Gunnery Sergeant (GySgt) First Sergeant (MSgt) Master Sergeant (MSG) Senior Master Sergeant (SMSgt) Master Sergeant (MSgt) E08 Senior Chief Petty Officer (SCPO) First Sergeant (1SG) First Sergeant (SMSgt) First Sergeant (1stSgt) Sergeant Major (SGM) Chief Master Sergeant (CMSgt) Master Gunnery Sergeant (MGySgt) E09 Master Chief Petty Officer (MCPO) First Sergeant (CMSgt) Command Sergeant Major (CSM) Sergeant Major (SgtMaj) Command Chief Master Sergeant (CCMSgt) O01 Second Lieutenant (2LT) Ensign (ENS) Second Lieutenant (2d Lt) Second Lieutenant (2dLt) O02 First Lieutenant (1LT) Lieutenant Junior Grade (LTJG) First Lieutenant (1st Lt) First Lieutenant (1Lt) O03 Captain (CPT) Lieutenant (LT) Captain (Capt) Captain (Capt) O04 Major (MAJ) Lieutenant Commander (LCDR) Major (Maj) Major (Maj) O05 Lieutenant Colonel (LTC) Commander (CDR) Lieutenant Colonel
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Hebrew Conflict and Military Terminology
    Modern Hebrew Conflict and Military Terminology The Language of the Israel Defense Forces Cato Hemmingby Master’s thesis Department of Culture Studies and Oriental Languages University of Oslo Autumn 2011 II Modern Hebrew Conflict and Military Terminology The Language of the Israel Defense Forces Cato Hemmingby III © Cato Hemmingby 2011 Modern Hebrew Conflict and Military Terminology Cato Hemmingby http://www.duo.uio.no/ Print: Reprosentralen, University of Oslo IV Acknowledgements I would like to express gratitude to a number of persons and institutions, for their help and assistance during my work with this subject. First of all, I would like to extend the most sincere thanks to my supervisor at the University of Oslo, professor Lutz Eberhard Edzard, for his skillful, dedicated and motivating approach to this thesis. Many thanks also to Espen Arnesen, who is a patient and inspiring teacher of Hebrew. Additionally, Lars Haugom has been a helpful and motivating mentor, contributing with general guidance, as well as outstanding regional knowledge. Thanks also to Yair and Judit Moy in Avnei Eitan, and my teacher Dalit Eizenkraft at The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. I am grateful for important assistance from different parts of the Norwegian defense community, and in particular Lt. Col. Palle Ydstebø at the Norwegian Defense Command and Staff College, and former Chief of Defense Sverre Diesen at SEFOSS. I have on several occasions visited The Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) in Tel Aviv, and special thanks to the Information Center manager Yoel Kozak and the experts Yehuda Ben-Meir and Shlomo Gazit. Likewise, I am very grateful to Professor Stuart A.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Corps Navy
    When communicating with members of the military by phone or in correspondence, always address them by rank and last name. In other words, never address them by rank only. This applies to all Active Duty, Guard, and Reserve members including the Standby Reserve. Army Rank How to Address the Member Designation GA General of the Army "General" GEN General "General" LTG Lieutenant General "General" MG Major General "General" BG Brigadier General "General" Col Colonel "Colonel" LTC Lieutenant Colonel "Colonel" MAJ Major "Major" CPT Captain "Captain" 1LT First Lieutenant "Lieutenant" 2LT Second Lieutenant "Lieutenant" CW2 - CW5 Chief Warrant Officer "Chief" WO1 Warrant Officer "Mr., Mrs., Ms." SMA Sergeant Major of the Army "Sergeant Major" CSM Command Sergeant Major "Sergeant Major" SGM Sergeant Major "Sergeant Major" 1SG First Sergeant "First Sergeant" MSG Master Sergeant "Sergeant" SFC Sergeant First Class "Sergeant" SSG Staff Sergeant "Sergeant" SGT Sergeant "Sergeant" CPL Corporal "Corporal" SPC Specialist "Specialist" PFC Private First Class "Private or PFC" PV2 Private "Private" PV1 Private "Private" Marine Corps Designation Rank How to Address the Member Gen General "General" LtGen Lieutenant General "General" MajGen Major General "General" BGen Brigadier General "General" Col Colonel "Colonel" LtCol Lieutenant Colonel "Colonel" Maj Major "Major" Capt Captain "Captain" 1stLt First Lieutenant "Lieutenant" 2ndLt Second Lieutenant "Lieutenant" CWO2 - CWO5 Chief Warrant Officer Chief Warrant Officer WO1 Warrant Officer Warrant Officer SgtMajMC
    [Show full text]
  • NATO Code of Ranks
    NATO UNCLASSIFIED NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION DU TRAITE DE L’ATLANTIQUE NORD MILITARY AGENCY FOR STANDARDIZATION (MAS) BUREAU MILITAIRE DE STANDARDISATION (BMS) 1110 BRUSSELS Tel. 707.5579 Fax: 707.5718 ARMY BOARD MAS(ARMY)073-MIS/2116 13 March 1996 To : Army Board Distribution List No. 5 Subject : STANAG 2116 MIS (EDITION 5) - NATO CODES FOR GRADES OF MILITARY PERSONNEL Reference : MAS(ARMY)2116(78)179 dated 14 June 1978 (Edition 4) Enclosure : STANAG 2116 (Edition 5) 1. The enclosed NATO Standardization Agreement which has been ratified by nations as reflected in page iii is promulgated herewith. 2. The reference listed above is to be destroyed in accordance with local document destruction procedures. 3. AAP-4 should be amended to reflect the latest status of the STANAG. 4. The Army Board, MAS, considers this an editorial revision of the STANAG; previous ratifying references and implementation details are deemed to be valid. G.B. FERRARI Major-General, ITAF Chairman, MAS 073/60nh(mv) NATO UNCLASSIFIED NATO UNCLASSIFIED STANAG No. 2116 (Edition 5) NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION (NATO) MILITARY AGENCY FOR STANDARDIZATION (MAS) STANDARDIZATION AGREEMENT (STANAG) SUBJECT: NATO CODES FOR GRADES OF MILITARY PERSONNEL Promulgated on 13 March 1996 G.B. FERRARI Major-General, ITAF Chairman, MAS NATO UNCLASSIFIED NATO UNCLASSIFIED RECORD OF AMENDMENTS No. Reference/date of Date Signature amendment entered 1-9 12/11/01 mv EXPLANATORY NOTES AGREEMENT 1. This NATO Standardization Agreement (STANAG) is promulgated by the Chairman MAS under the authority vested in him by the NATO Military Committee. 2. No departure may be made from the agreement without consultation with the tasking authority.
    [Show full text]