CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT for BELARUS 2016 – 1 of 112 –

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT for BELARUS 2016 – 1 of 112 – Centralized National Risk Assessment for Belarus FSC-CNRA-BY V1-0 EN FSC-CNRA-BY V1-0 CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR BELARUS 2016 – 1 of 112 – Title: Centralized National Risk Assessment for Belarus Document reference FSC-CNO.A-BY V1-0 EN code: Approval body: FSC International Center: Policy and Standards Unit Date of approval: Contact for comments: FSC International Center - Policy and Standards Unit - Charles-de-Gaulle-Str. 5 53113 Bonn, Germany +49-(0)228-36766-0 +49-(0)228-36766-30 [email protected] © 2016 Forest Stewardship Council, A.C. All rights reserved. No part of this work covered by the publisher’s copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, recording taping, or information retrieval systems) without the written permission of the publisher. Printed copies of this document are for reference only. Please refer to the electronic copy on the FSC website (ic.fsc.org) to ensure you are referring to the latest version. The Forest Stewardship Council® (FSC) is an independent, not for profit, non- government organization established to support environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world’s forests. FSC’s vision is that the world’s forests meet the social, ecological, and economic rights and needs of the present generation without compromising those of future generations. FSC-CNRA-BY V1-0 CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR BELARUS 2016 – 2 of 112 – Contents Risk designations in finalized risk assessments for Belarus ...................................... 4 Risk assessments ..................................................................................................... 5 Controlled wood category 1: Illegally harvested wood ........................................... 5 Overview ........................................................................................................... 5 Sources of legal timber in Belarus ..................................................................... 7 Risk assessment ............................................................................................... 8 Recommended control measures .................................................................... 55 Controlled wood category 2: Wood harvested in violation of traditional and human rights ................................................................................................................... 56 Risk assessment ............................................................................................. 56 Recommended control measures .................................................................... 56 Detailed analysis of sources of information and evidence ................................ 57 Controlled wood category 3: Wood from forests in which high conservation values are threatened by management activities ............................................................ 88 Overview ......................................................................................................... 88 Risk assessment ............................................................................................. 90 Recommended control measures .................................................................. 105 Information sources ....................................................................................... 106 Experts consulted .......................................................................................... 108 Controlled wood category 4: Wood from forests being converted to plantations or non-forest use ................................................................................................... 109 Risk assessment ........................................................................................... 109 Recommended control measures .................................................................. 111 Controlled wood category 5: Wood from forests in which genetically modified trees are planted ........................................................................................................ 112 Risk assessment ........................................................................................... 112 Recommended control measures .................................................................. 112 FSC-CNRA-BY V1-0 CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR BELARUS 2016 – 3 of 112 – Risk designations in finalized risk assessments for Belarus Indicator Risk designation (including functional scale when relevant) Controlled wood category 1: Illegally harvested wood 1.1 Low risk 1.2 Low risk 1.3 Low risk 1.4 Low risk 1.5 Low risk 1.6 Low risk 1.7 Low risk 1.8 Low risk 1.9 Specified risk 1.10 Low risk 1.11 Low risk 1.12 Low risk 1.13 Low risk 1.14 N/A 1.15 N/A 1.16 Low risk 1.17 Low risk 1.18 Low risk 1.19 Low risk 1.20 Low risk 1.21 N/A Controlled wood category 2: Wood harvested in violation of traditional and human rights 2.1 Low risk 2.2 Specified risk for trade union rights, freedom of association and collective bargaining, compulsory and/or forced labour, discrimination of women at work and gender wage discrimination. Low risk for all other aspects of indicator 2.2, mainly child labour. 2.3 Low risk Controlled wood category 3: Wood from forests where high conservation values are threatened by management activities 3.0 Low risk 3.1 Specified risk 3.2 Specified risk 3.3 Specified risk 3.4 Low risk 3.5 N/A 3.6 Low risk Controlled wood category 4: Wood from forests being converted to plantations or non-forest use 4.1 Low risk Controlled wood category 5: Wood from forests in which genetically modified trees are planted 5.1 Low risk FSC-CNRA-BY V1-0 CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR BELARUS 2016 – 4 of 112 – Risk assessments Controlled wood category 1: Illegally harvested wood Overview Forests in the Republic of Belarus are the exclusive property of the State,which means that all produced timber origins from state managed forests. The Forest Code (Forest Code of the Republic of Belarus of 2015 No. 332-Z) states that Belarusian forests are divided into 4 categories according to the management purpose: conservation forests, recreation and health forests, protected forests, managed forests. Harvesting of timber is allowed depending on the management and protection regime assigned based on the forest category. Forest management permits are based on the Forest Management Plan and Charter (Statute) of Forestry Enterprise. Timber harvesting is regulated according to the Edict of the President of the Republic of Belarus No.214 of 07.05.2007 (in conformity with the Edict of the President of the Republic of Belarus No.504 of 08.11.2012). All timber sales are based on online trading (bidding), which is managed by the Timber Trade Department of the Open Joint Stock Company "Belarusian Universal Commodity Exchange”. Timber can only be purchased by organisations registered in the database of the Open Joint Stock Company and must follow open official procedures. The authorities responsible for monitoring of timber harvesting and other forestry measures are as follows (Forest Code, Chapter 23, Article 106): 1) State authority of Environmental Protection (Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection of the Republic of Belarus) as well as its territorial bodies; 2) State Control Committee of the Republic of Belarus; 3) State Inspectorate for Protection of Fauna and Flora under the President of the Republic of Belarus; 4) Executive Office of the President of the Republic of Belarus; 5) State authority of Forestry Management (Ministry of Forestry of the Republic of Belarus, Ministry of Defence, etc.), as well as State Regional Forestry Boards (GPLHO); 6) Other state bodies (organisations) in accordance with the legislative acts (paragraph 2.6 of Article 106). Logging licenses are based on the data of Forest Management Plan. Harvest permits are either 1. “Logging bilet” (permission for felling of forest stand) or “Forest warrant” (“Order”) (permission for felling of a part of forest stand or individual trees). 2. Forest warrant is issued for logging by “citizens” (local people) of no more than 50 cubic meters of wood. FSC-CNRA-BY V1-0 CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR BELARUS 2016 – 5 of 112 – 3. Forest Card (“Forest bilet”) is a permission for harvesting of non-timber products. This means that the logging permits are not divided into different types of logging. In 2015, Belarus had a CPI of 32 (below the threshold of 50) and according to the World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators (on a scale of -2,5 to 2,5 in 2014) received a score of -0,50 for Government Effectiveness, -0,81 on Rule of Law and -0,32 on Control of Corruption. This indicates that the country has high corruption levels and a low degree of legal compliance despite the governance score having improved over the last 10 years. With regard to forestry and the issuance of permits for logging, specific instances of bribery and corruption are not known. There are a few cases about attempts to bribe forestry officials, but these cases are not related to forestry activities (i.e. not related to the issuance of permits, but related to the construction of buildings) (Sources: the official website of the General Prosecutor’s Office of the Republic of Belarus). The list of sources provided in FSC-PRO-60-002a, section 3.3.3 has been reviewed for relevance with regard to the national legality risk assessment of Belarus. The following sources have been
Recommended publications
  • Botrychium Simplex E. Hitchc. (Ophioglossaceae) – a New Species for the Native Flora of Ukraine
    Biodiv. Res. Conserv. 43: 7-12, 2016 BRC www.brc.amu.edu.pl DOI 10.1515/biorc-2016-0015 Submitted 8.04.2016, Accepted 23.09.2016 Botrychium simplex E. Hitchc. (Ophioglossaceae) – a new species for the native flora of Ukraine Ivan Yu. Parnikoza1* & Zbigniew Celka2 1Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics NAS of Ukraine, Zabolotnoho 150, 03680 Kyiv, Ukraine 2Department of Plant Taxonomy, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznań, Poland * corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract. The work presents the results of herbarium survey that resulted in findingBotrychium simplex E. Hitchc. – a new for the native Ukrainian flora species of the family Ophioglossaceae. A specimen of this taxon was found in the National Herbarium of Ukraine in the M. G. Kholodny Institute of Botany of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine in Kyiv (KW) among the specimens of Botrychium lunaria (L.) Sw. originating from the surroundings of Kharkiv. Thus, this finding indicates the most south-eastern locality of B. simplex in Europe found so far. Key words: least moonwort, common moonwort, rare species, Ukraine, herbarium, Kyiv, KW 1. Introduction have been conducted in Ukraine for over 10 years (see Parnikoza 2002, 2010; Chorney et al. 2004; Parnikoza The genus Botrychium Sw. is represented in the & Tsukanova 2005; Melnik 2009, Bezsmertna & Heluta world flora by 25 species (Mabberley 2008), while 2013; Votkalchuk et al. 2014; Parnikoza & Celka 2016). in Europe by seven (Valentine & Moore 2007). The The aim of this work is to provide information on majority of European species of Botrychium belong Botrychium simplex, a species not previously identified to threatened taxa on the scale of whole Europe (e.g., and listed in the native flora of Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Golden Aging Golden Aging Prospects for Healthy, Active, and Prosperous Aging in Europe and Central Asia Maurizio Bussolo, Johannes Koettl, and Emily Sinnott © 2015 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org Some rights reserved 1 2 3 4 18 17 16 15 This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The fi ndings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily refl ect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of The World Bank, all of which are specifi cally reserved. Rights and Permissions This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo. Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, you are free to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt this work, including for commercial purposes, under the following conditions: Attribution—Please cite the work as follows: Bussolo, Maurizio, Johannes Koettl, and Emily Sinnott.
    [Show full text]
  • I I I I I I I ISBN: 0-85964-482-0 I I I J :1 I I I TABLE of CONTENTS I PREFACE Iii
    A R C H. I V E S 0 F T H E 'I SOVIET COMMUNIST PARTY AND SOVIET STATE I I I I I Catalogue of Finding Aids and Docun1ents I fro1n three kev•. : archives i on n1icrofihn I I Fourth edition: June 2004 I I Published jointly by Slate Archival Service Hoover Institution on vVar. I Revolution and Peace of Russi a CRo' sarkhi \ .·) I I Distributed b\· l CfJ.., CHA D\VYCK-llFALEY 1:~ I f 1· I I I I Fourth Edition: June 2004 I I I I I I I ISBN: 0-85964-482-0 I I I J :1 I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS I PREFACE iii I INTRODUCTION v I HOW TO USE THE CATALOGUE xiii HOW TO ORDER MICROFILM XIV I LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xvii CENTRE FOR THE PRESERVATION OF CONTEMPORARY DOCUMENTATION (TsKhSD) I [Renamed Russian State Archive of Contemporary History - RGANI] OPISI I FINDING AIDS SERIES 1 I DELA/DOCUMENTS SERIES 2 ~ I RUSSIAN CENTRE FOR THE PRESERVATION AND STUDY OF DOCUMENTS OF MOST RECENT HISTORY (RTsKhIDNI) I [Renamed Russian State Archive of Social and Political History - RGASPI] OPISI I FINDING AIDS SERIES 3 I DELA/ DOCUMENTS SERIES 10 STATE ARCHIVE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION (GARF) I r-series [Collection held at Pirogovskaia Street] OPISI I FINDING AIDS SERIES 15 I DELA I DOCUMENTS SERIES 57 I STATE ARCHIVE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION (GARF) a-series [Collection held at Berezhkovskaia Naberezhnaia] I OPISI I FINDING AIDS SERIES 69 I DELA I DOCUMENTS SERIES 89 I, I­ I I 111 I PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION I The State Archival Service of the Russian Federation (Rosarkhiv), the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, and Chadwyck-Healey concluded an agreement in April 1992 to I microfilm the records and opisi (finding aids) of the Communist Party of the fonner Soviet Union, as well as other selected holdings of the State Archives.
    [Show full text]
  • The Specifics of Modern Educational Migration in the Countries of the Customs Union (Russia, Republic of Belarus, Kazakhstan)
    Yessentayeva, A., Akhemetova, B., Kadirsizova, S, et al., (2019) /Vol. 8 Núm. 19: 130-137/ Marzo - abril 2019 130 Artículo de investigación The specifics of modern educational migration in the countries of the Customs Union (Russia, Republic of Belarus, Kazakhstan) ОСОБЕННОСТИ СОВРЕМЕННОЙ ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЬНОЙ МИГРАЦИИ В СТРАНАХ ТАМОЖЕННОГО СОЮЗА Los detalles de la migración educativa moderna en los países de la Unión Aduanera (Rusia, Republica de Belarus, Kazakstan) Recibido: 15 de febrero de 2019. Aceptado: 18 de marzo de 2019 Written by: Assel Yessentayeva46 Bigaysha Z. Akhmetova47 Shynar B. Kadirsizova48 Karas Kaziev49 Gani Baiulov50 Guldensin O. Rakhimbekova51 Saltanat K. Akhtanova52 Abstract Resumen The article describes the types of student El artículo describe los tipos de migración migration and methodological approaches to its estudiantil y los enfoques metodológicos para su study. The global trends in educational migration estudio. Se analizan las tendencias mundiales de and the development of this process in Belarus in la migración educativa y el desarrollo de este the period 1999–2014 are analyzed. The countries proceso en Bielorrusia en el período 1999- of origin are highlighted, and factors that 2014. Se destacan los países de origen y se contribute to attracting educational migrants to indican los factores que contribuyen a atraer the Republic of Belarus are indicated. One of the migrantes educativos a la República de characteristic trends in the development of the Bielorrusia. Una de las tendencias características modern education system is the rapid growth of en el desarrollo del sistema educativo moderno student migration throughout the twentieth es el rápido crecimiento de la migración century. The scale of academic mobility and estudiantil a lo largo del siglo XX.
    [Show full text]
  • 11083/15 Cf/Ab 1 DG C 1 Die Delegationen
    Rat der Europäischen Union Brüssel, den 20. Juli 2015 (OR. en) 11083/15 CFSP/PESC 435 COPS 245 FIN 527 PE 128 BERATUNGSERGEBNISSE Absender: Generalsekretariat des Rates Empfänger: Delegationen Nr. Vordok.: 10549/15 Betr.: Hauptaspekte und grundlegende Optionen der GASP (Teil II Buchstabe E Nummer 25 der Interinstitutionellen Vereinbarung vom 2. Dezember 2013) - 2014 Entwurf des Jahresberichts der Hohen Vertreterin der Europäischen Union für Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik an das Europäische Parlament Die Delegationen erhalten beigefügt das Dokument "Hauptaspekte und grundlegende Optionen der GASP (Teil II Buchstabe E Nummer 25 der Interinstitutionellen Vereinbarung vom 2. Dezember 2013) – 2014 – Entwurf des Jahresberichts der Hohen Vertreterin der Europäischen Union für Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik an das Europäische Parlament", wie es der Rat am 20. Juli 2015 gebilligt hat. 11083/15 cf/ab 1 DG C 1 DE Entwurf des Jahresberichts der Hohen Vertreterin der Europäischen Union für Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik an das Europäische Parlament Hauptaspekte und grundlegende Optionen der GASP – 2014 – EINLEITUNG ................................................................................................................................ 15 1. Beispiele für das weltweite Engagement der EU ............................................................... 16 2. Künftige Herausforderungen.............................................................................................. 20 A. Tätigkeitsüberblick nach Regionen ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Situation of Human Rights in Belarus in 2012
    Human Rights Center «Viasna» Situation of Human Rights in Belarus in 2012 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Мinsk, 2013 SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN BELARUS IN 2012 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Compiled by Tatsiana Reviaka Editing and introduction by Valiantsin Stefanovich The book was prepared on the basis of the monthly reviews of the situation of human rights in Belarus in 2012. Each of the monthly reviews includes the analysis of the most important events which influenced the observation of human rights for the given period, as well as the most evident and characteristic features of the abuses registered at that time. The review was prepared on the basis of personal applications of victims of human rights violations, the facts that were registered by human rigths defenders or voiced in open information sources. The book makes use of photos by Yuliya Darashkevich Dzmitry Bushko, Siarhei Hudzilin, Nastassia Loika, the web-sites http://photo.bymedia. net, http://nn.by, http://euroradio.fm, http://www.svaboda.org, http://volkovysk.by, http://gazetaby.com, http://mfront.net, http://www.reuters.com, http://belsat.eu/be, belhouse.org and the archive of the Human Rights Center «Viasna». TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 9 Review-Chronicle of Human Rights Violations in Belarus in January 2012 19 Politically motivated criminal prosecution 19 Harassment and pressurization of human rights activists and organizations 21 Torture and cruel treatment, poor conditions of detention 23 Death penalty 25 Administrative prosecution of social and political activists 25 Restrictions on freedom of speech 27 Restrictions on freedom of assembly 28 Situation of freedom of association 30 Review-Chronicle of Human Rights Violations in Belarus in February 2012 31 Political prisoners.
    [Show full text]
  • Protected Areas in Eastern and Central Europe and the USSR Digitized by Tine Internet Arciiive
    World Conservation Union East European Programme Protected Areas in Eastern and Central Europe and the USSR Digitized by tine Internet Arciiive in 2010 witii funding from UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge Iittp://www.arcliive.org/details/protectedareasin90iucn lUCN East European Programme and World Conservation Monitoring Centre in collaboration with lUCN's Commission on National Parks and Protected Areas ^0^§> Protected Areas in Eastern and Central Europe and the USSR (An Interim Review) 1 990 Environmental Research Series The views expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect those of lUCN. Neither do the presentation of material and geographic designations employed imply any expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of lUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or bounda- ries. © 1990 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of material in this volume for educational and other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior permission from the copyright holder. Reproduction of material in this volume for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior permis- sion of the copyright holder. ISBN 2-8317-0038-8 Camera-ready copy and cover design by The Nature Conser- vation Bureau Ltd., 36 Kingfisher Court, Newbury, Berk- shire, UK. Printed by Information Press, Oxford, UK. Contents Foreword 4 Acknowledgements 4 Country Accounts 5 Albania, the People's Socialist Republic of. 6 Bulgaria, the People's Republic of 10 The Czech and Slovak Federative Republic 17 The Eastern Lander of the Federal Republic of Germany (formerly the German Democratic Republic) 24 Hungary, the Republic of 31 Poland, the Republic of.
    [Show full text]
  • Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases in Belarus the Case for Investment
    Empowered lives. Resilient nations. RUBLE Prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases in Belarus The case for investment a Prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases in Belarus The case for investment Prepared for the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Belarus by WHO Regional Office for Europe United Nations Development Programme Authors: Anna Kontsevaya Jill Farrington Oxana Rotar Dudley Tarlton Lika Gamgebeli Valiantsin Rusovich Empowered lives. Resilient nations. Abstract Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes and chronic respiratory diseases and their risk factors are an increasing public health and development challenge in Belarus. This report provides evidence that NCDs reduce economic output and discusses potential options in response. An economic burden analysis shows that economic losses from NCDs (direct and indirect costs) are 46.7 trillion old Belarusian rubles per year, which is equivalent to 5.4% of the country’s gross domestic product in 2015. An intervention costing analysis provides an estimation of the funding required to implement a set of policy interventions for tobacco and alcohol control and salt reduction, and cardiovascular disease and diabetes clinical interventions. The economic analysis demonstrated significant returns on investment for all policy interventions. Keywords CHRONIC DISEASE – ECONOMICS CHRONIC DISEASE – PREVENTION AND CONTROL COST–BENEFIT ANALYSIS REPUBLIC OF BELARUS Address requests about publications of the WHO Regional Office for Europe to: Publications WHO Regional Office for Europe UN City, Marmorvej 51 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for permission to quote or translate, on the Regional Office website (http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest).
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Management and Cost Accounting of Wood Harvesting in the Republic of Karelia
    Dissertationes Forestales 106 Development of management and cost accounting of wood harvesting in the Republic of Karelia Olga Tyukina School of Forest Science Faculty of Science and Forestry University of Eastern Finland Academic dissertation To be presented, with the permission of the Faculty of Science and Forestry of the University of Eastern Finland for public criticism in Auditorium Borealis 100 of the University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistokatu 7, Joensuu on May 28th, 2010, at 12 o’clock noon. 2 Title of dissertation: Development of management and cost accounting of wood harvesting in the Republic of Karelia Author: Olga Tyukina Dissertationes Forestales 106 Thesis supervisors: Prof. Olli Saastamoinen University of Eastern Finland, Faculty of Science and Forestry Prof. Anatoliy Petrov All-Russia Institute of Continuous Education in Forestry, Russia Prof. Lauri Sikanen University of Eastern Finland, Faculty of Science and Forestry Pre-examiners: Docent Markku Penttinen Finnish Forest Research Institute, Vantaa Unit Dr. Yuri Gerasimov Finnish Forest Research Institute, Joensuu Unit Opponent: Prof. Vladimir Syunev Petrozavodsk State University, Faculty of Forest Engineering, Russia ISSN 1795-7389 ISBN 978-951-651-301-3 (PDF) (2010) Printers: University of Eastern Finland Printing House, Joensuu 2010 Publishers: The Finnish Society of Forest Science Finnish Forest Research Institute Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry of the University of Helsinki Faculty of Science and Forestry of the University of Eastern Finland Editoral Office: Finnish Society of Forest Science P.O. Box 18, FI-01301 Vantaa, Finland http://www.metla.fi/dissertationes 3 ABSTRACT Tyukina, O. 2010. Development of management and cost accounting of wood harvesting in the Republic of Karelia.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Products Forest Annual Market Annual Review 2014-2015
    UNECE Forest Products Forest Annual MarketAnnual Review 2014-2015 UNECE Forest Products - Annual Market Review 2014-2015 UNITED NATIONS UNECE Forest Products Annual Market Review 2014-2015 II UNECE/FAO Forest Products Annual Market Review, 2014-2015 NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Data for the Commonwealth of Independent States is composed of these twelve countries: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Republic of Moldova, Russian Federation, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine and Uzbekistan. DISCLAIMER The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or carry the endorsement of the United Nations. ABSTRACT The Forest Products Annual Market Review 2014-2015 provides a comprehensive analysis of markets in the UNECE region and reports on the main market influences outside the UNECE region, using the best-available data from diverse sources. It covers the range of products from the forest to the end-user: from roundwood and primary-processed products to value-added products and those used in housing. Statistics-based chapters analyse the markets for wood raw materials, sawn softwood, sawn hardwood, wood- based panels, paper, paperboard and woodpulp. Other chapters analyse policies, institutional forestland ownership and its effects on forest products markets, and markets for wood energy. The Review highlights the role of sustainable forest products in international markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Institutional Hurdles in the Russian Forest Sector
    : LICENTIATE T H E SI S MTAS-OLOV OLSSON B MTAS-OLOV Barriers to Change? arriers to Change? Understanding the Institutional Hurdles in the Russian Forest Sector – Understanding the Institutional Hurdles in the Russian Forest Mats-Olov Olsson Sector Luleå University of Technology Department of Business Administration and Social Sciences, Division of Political Science : Universitetstryckeriet, Luleå :|: -|: - -- ⁄ -- To the memory of Jan Åke Dellenbrant Preface The main part of the research reported in this thesis was performed in the period April 1997 through December 2001, when I was working in the Forestry Program of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) in Austria. In a study labeled Institutions and the Emergence of Markets – Transition in the Russian Forest Sector a series of case studies of the institutional embedding of the forest sector in eight Russian regions was performed by a small core team of IIASA researchers in collaboration with a number of Russian colleagues and PhD students enrolled in the institute’s Young Scientists Summer Program. The intense intellectual exchange in this research group has meant a lot for me and my work with this thesis and I would like to express my gratitude to everyone involved in the project. It is not possible to name all of these people here, but they can all be found in the study’s List of Publications (see Appendix). Several people should, however, be named for all the help and support they offered me during the work with this thesis. First of all I would like to thank my friend and thesis supervisor, Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Sanctions and Russia Order in Ukraine, by Resuming Fighting and Taking Over New Towns and Villages, and Russia the West Will Have to Scale-Up Sanctions Significantly
    Sanctions have so far been the most effective instrument of Western influ- ence on Russia’s policy towards Ukraine, stopping the Kremlin from making a greater military incursion in the country. Restrictions were imposed against more than one hundred members of the Russian political and business elite, as sanctions well as dozens of Russian enterprises and banks. The annexation of Crimea and war in eastern Ukraine transformed assumptions about Russia, from a strategic partner, especially in energy, into a strategic challenge, mainly for regional secu- rity. Should Russia persist in challenging the principles of European cooperative sanctions And Russia order in Ukraine, by resuming fighting and taking over new towns and villages, And Russia the West will have to scale-up sanctions significantly. At the same time, the West should elaborate precise benchmarks against which to measure any potential Russian cooperative behaviour in Ukraine, before deciding to suspend or cancel sanctions. The Polish Institute of International Affairs (PISM) is a leading Central Europe- an think tank that positions itself between the world of politics and independent analysis. PISM provides analytical support to decision-makers, initiates public debate and disseminates expert knowledge about contemporary international relations. The work of PISM is guided by the conviction that the decision-mak- Edited by ing process in international relations should be based on knowledge that comes from reliable and valid research. The Institute carries out its own research,
    [Show full text]