Real-Time Simulation of Time-Of-Flight Sensors and Accumulation of Range Camera Data

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Real-Time Simulation of Time-Of-Flight Sensors and Accumulation of Range Camera Data Real-time Simulation of Time-of-Flight Sensors and Accumulation of Range Camera Data Echtzeit Simulation von Time-of-Flight Sensoren und Akkumulation von Tiefendaten bei der Naturwissenschaftlich-Technischen Fakultät der Universität Siegen zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Ingenieurwissenschaften (Dr.-Ing.) genehmigte Dissertation von Maik Keller 17. Juni 2015 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Andreas Kolb, Universität Siegen 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Reinhard Koch, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel Mündliche Prüfung: 13. November 2015 Printed on non-aging wood- and acid-free paper. Gedruckt auf alterungsbeständigem holz- und säurefreiem Papier. Acknowledgments I would like to thank all those who contributed to the success of this work. First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor Prof. Dr. Andreas Kolb for his great support and the opportunity he gave me to work in his research group. He gave me the freedom to explore my own ideas and he was always open for discussion and supervision of my work. I thank Prof. Dr. Reinhard Koch for agreeing to act as the second referee. I gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research within the Lynkeus project. Sincere thanks are given to all my colleagues from the Computer Graphics Group in Siegen, I enjoyed working with them very much. Special thanks go to Prof. Dr. Christof Rezk-Salama who introduced me to the world of Computer Graphics. I feel deeply grateful for co-working with my friend Dr. Jens Orthmann. He is a great person. I thank all co-authors of my publications. Especially, I would like to thank Dr. Shahram Izadi from Microsoft Research in Cambridge, and Prof. Dr. Tim Weyrich from University College London. I also would like to thank Dr. Martin Lambers, Dr. Nicolas Cuntz, and Dr. Marvin Lindner for valuable discussions and their scientific contributions to my papers. Particularly, I would like to mention Damien Lefloch and Thomas Hoegg for their inspiring discussions and their work in the field of Time- of-Flight simulation and 3D reconstruction. I thank Andrea Anders and Willi Gräfrath from the Computer Graphics Group for the handling of all administrative matters. I am very much obliged to my supervisors and colleagues from pmd technologies: Dr. Bernd Buxbaum, Dr. Robert Lange, and Jochen Penne for their support and for giving me the freedom to concentrate on finishing my research. Furthermore, I would like to thank Dr. Lutz Heyne, Stefan Hoberg, Martin Profittlich, Alexander Strauch, Michelle Schneider, and Daniel Queisser for valuable discussions and their help in the context of this thesis. I would also like to thank Maria Knaier for proof-reading this thesis. Finally, and above all, I would like to express my deep gratitude to my family: my parents Renate and Jürgen Keller, my sisters Tina and Daniela, and my parents-in- law Brigitte and Reiner Ohrndorf. They always believed in me, which I appreciate very much. Last, but not least, I would like to thank my wife Kathrin, the love of my life, and our sweet children Momo and Kasimir. My wife sacrificed a lot in order to simplify things for me. Her patience and her support enabled me to finish this work, for which I am very grateful and which is beyond any words. – Maik Keller June 2015 Abstract he present thesis addresses the topic of 3D range imaging in a twofold way: new Tmethods in the field of range data simulation as well as the accumulation of range images into a consistent data representation, namely 3D environment models, for high quality 3D object reconstruction are proposed. Within the last years inexpensive Time-of-Flight (ToF) range imaging devices have become an alternative to traditional depth measuring approaches. ToF cameras mea- sure full-range distance information by actively illuminating a scene and measuring the time until back-scattered light is detected. The final distance information is com- puted from multiple raw images. This thesis proposes a method for simulating the ToF principle in real-time along with the major sensor characteristics. The approach is motivated by physically-based illumination models and applied to the simulation of Photonic Mixing Devices, a specific type of ToF sensors. Furthermore, this thesis presents new methods of range data accumulation in real- time. While the hierarchical volumetric approach supports merging and subtraction of sub-volumes with arbitrary resolutions, the point-based fusion method accounts for spatial limitations of previous approaches and addresses high quality 3D reconstruc- tions at extended scales. Additionally, dynamically changing scenes are supported which results in advanced camera pose estimation as well as reduced drift errors. The algorithms are evaluated using simulated data as well as real camera data from structured light and ToF devices. The algorithms presented in this thesis feature an extensive data-parallel implemen- tation on current graphics processing units in order to ensure the online capability of the methods but without restricting the algorithms to hardware-specific features. i Zusammenfassung ie vorliegende Arbeit befasst sich im Bereich der 3D Tiefen-Bildverarbeitung mit Dzwei unterschiedlichen Themengebieten: zum einen geht es um neue Ansätze zur Simulation von Tiefenbilddaten, zum anderen geht es um die Akkumulierung von Entfernungsbildern in eine konsistente Datenbasis - auch 3D Umgebungsmodelle genannt - für qualitativ hochwertige 3D Objektrekonstruktionen. Im Laufe der letzten Jahre haben sich kostengünstige 3D Laufzeitkamerasysteme (Time-of-Flight, ToF) zu einer ernstzunehmenden Alternative zu traditionellen Ab- standsmessverfahren etabliert. ToF-Kameras erfassen Entfernungsbilder, indem die Szene aktiv beleuchtet und die Laufzeit des reflektierten Lichts bestimmt wird. Dabei werden die Tiefendaten aus mehreren Rohbildern rekonstruiert. Diese Arbeit stellt einen Ansatz zur Echtzeit-Simulation des ToF-Verfahrens vor, welcher auch die Simu- lation von relevanten Sensor-Charakteristiken umfasst. Der Ansatz ist physikalisch motiviert und findet seine Anwendung in der Simulation von Photomischdetektoren (Photonic Mixing Devices), welche auf dem Lichtlaufzeitverfahren basieren. Darüber hinaus werden in der vorliegenden Arbeit neue Verfahren für die Akkumu- lierung von Entfernungsbildern präsentiert. Der hierarchisch-volumetrische Ansatz unterstützt das Hinzufügen und Entfernen von Teil-Volumen mit unterschiedlicher Auflösung. Im Gegensatz zu bisherigen Ansätzen stellt die punkt-basierte Metho- de qualitativ hochwertige Rekonstruktion von großen Szenen sicher. Des Weiteren werden dynamische Szenen unterstützt. Dadurch verbessern sich die Abschätzung der Kamerapose sowie das Abdriften während der Datenfusion. Die Anwendung der Algorithmen wird unter Nutzung von Simulationsdaten und realen Kameradaten (ba- sierend sowohl auf dem strukturierten Licht-Ansatz als auch auf dem ToF Verfahren) demonstriert. Alle präsentierten Algorithmen zeichnen sich durch eine umfangreiche daten-parallele Implementierung auf derzeit verfügbaren Grafikkarten aus, um die Echtzeitverarbei- tung sicherzustellen. Die Algorithmen werden dabei nicht auf hardware-spezifische Aspekte eingeschränkt. iii Contents Abstract i 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Context ................................... 2 1.2 OverallGoals ................................ 2 1.3 Contributions................................ 3 1.4 Outline ................................... 5 2 Fundamentals 7 2.1 CurrentRangeImagingTechniques . 7 2.2 Photo Mixing Device Technology . 11 2.2.1 SignalTheory............................ 11 2.2.2 PixelDesign ............................ 13 2.2.3 SensorEffects............................ 14 2.3 EnvironmentModeling. 16 2.3.1 Types of Representation . 18 2.3.2 Registration............................. 20 2.3.3 Merging............................... 21 2.3.4 Rendering.............................. 23 2.3.5 Discussion.............................. 24 2.4 GraphicsHardware............................. 25 2.4.1 GraphicsPipeline . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 26 2.4.2 General Purpose Computation . 27 2.4.3 Discussion.............................. 29 3 Time-of-Flight Sensor Simulation 31 3.1 Motivation ................................. 31 3.2 RelatedWork................................ 32 3.3 Physically-basedSensorModel . 33 3.3.1 Illumination and Radiosity . 33 3.3.2 Simple Model with Point Light Illumination . 34 3.3.3 Enhanced Model including Area Light Illumination . 36 3.4 SimulationFramework . 36 3.5 Implementation............................... 38 3.5.1 Phase Image Calculation . 39 3.5.2 FlyingPixels ............................ 39 3.5.3 MotionBlur............................. 40 3.5.4 Correlation Function . 41 3.5.5 Integration of Sensor Noise . 42 3.6 ResultsandAnalysis ............................ 43 v vi CONTENTS 3.6.1 Evaluation: Comparison to Real Sensor Data . 43 3.6.2 Wiggling Evaluation . 44 3.6.3 Motion Evaluation . 45 3.6.4 Illumination: Point Light vs. Area Light . 45 3.6.5 ExperimentalScenes . 46 3.7 Discussion.................................. 49 4 Hierarchical Volumetric Data Accumulation 51 4.1 Motivation ................................. 51 4.2 RelatedWork................................ 53 4.3 OverviewofConcept............................ 54 4.3.1 TreeTopology ........................... 54 4.3.2 Tree Manipulation . 55 4.4 Implementation............................... 57 4.4.1 Storage of Dynamic Volume Trees . 58 4.4.2 Modification of Dynamic Volume Trees . 59 4.4.3 Redundancy Optimization . 62 4.4.4 Generation of
Recommended publications
  • Depth Camera Technology Comparison and Performance Evaluation
    DEPTH CAMERA TECHNOLOGY COMPARISON AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Benjamin Langmann, Klaus Hartmann and Otmar Loffeld ZESS – Center for Sensor Systems, University of Siegen, Paul-Bonatz-Strasse 9-11, Siegen, Germany Keywords: Depth, Range camera, Time-of-Flight, ToF, Photonic Mixer Device, PMD, Comparison. Abstract: How good are cheap depth cameras, namely the Microsoft Kinect, compared to state of the art Time-of- Flight depth cameras? In this paper several depth cameras of different types were put to the test on a variety of tasks in order to judge their respective performance and to find out their weaknesses. We will concentrate on the common area of applications for which both types are specified, i.e. near field indoor scenes. The characteristics and limitations of the different technologies as well as the concrete hardware implementations are discussed and evaluated with a set of experimental setups. Especially, the noise level and the axial and angular resolutions are compared. Additionally, refined formulas to generate depth values based on the raw measurements of the Kinect are presented. 1 INTRODUCTION when used outdoors. Currently, ToF imaging chips reaching resolutions up to 200x200 pixels are on the Depth or range cameras have been developed for market and chips with 352x288 pixels are in several years and are available to researchers as well development and for a few years some ToF chips as on the market for certain applications for about a feature methods to suppress ambient light (e.g. decade. PMDTec, Mesa Imaging, 3DV Systems and Suppression of Background Illumination - SBI). Canesta were the companies driving the Other depth cameras or measuring devices, such development of Time-of-Flight (ToF) depth as laser scanners or structured light approaches, cameras.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Interaction with Large Displays Through Monocular Computer Vision
    DIRECT INTERACTION WITH LARGE DISPLAYS THROUGH MONOCULAR COMPUTER VISION A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Information Technologies at The University of Sydney Kelvin Cheng October 2008 © Copyright by Kelvin Cheng 2008 All Rights Reserved Abstract Large displays are everywhere, and have been shown to provide higher productivity gain and user satisfaction compared to traditional desktop monitors. The computer mouse remains the most common input tool for users to interact with these larger displays. Much effort has been made on making this interaction more natural and more intuitive for the user. The use of computer vision for this purpose has been well researched as it provides freedom and mobility to the user and allows them to interact at a distance. Interaction that relies on monocular computer vision, however, has not been well researched, particularly when used for depth information recovery. This thesis aims to investigate the feasibility of using monocular computer vision to allow bare-hand interaction with large display systems from a distance. By taking into account the location of the user and the interaction area available, a dynamic virtual touchscreen can be estimated between the display and the user. In the process, theories and techniques that make interaction with computer display as easy as pointing to real world objects is explored. Studies were conducted to investigate the way human point at objects naturally with their hand and to examine the inadequacy in existing pointing systems. Models that underpin the pointing strategy used in many of the previous interactive systems were formalized.
    [Show full text]
  • Per-Pixel Calibration for RGB-Depth Natural 3D Reconstruction on GPU
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Electrical and Computer Engineering Electrical and Computer Engineering 2016 Per-Pixel Calibration for RGB-Depth Natural 3D Reconstruction on GPU Sen Li University of Kentucky, [email protected] Author ORCID Identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9906-0481 Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.13023/ETD.2016.416 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Li, Sen, "Per-Pixel Calibration for RGB-Depth Natural 3D Reconstruction on GPU" (2016). Theses and Dissertations--Electrical and Computer Engineering. 93. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/ece_etds/93 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Electrical and Computer Engineering at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Electrical and Computer Engineering by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion Capture Technologies 24
    MOTION CAPTURE TECHNOLOGIES 24. 3. 2015 DISA Seminar Jakub Valcik Outline Human Motion and Digitalization Motion Capture Devices Optical Ranging Sensor Inertial and Magnetic Comparison Human Motion Brain + Skeleton + Muscles Internal factors External Factors Musculature Shoes Skeleton Clothes Weight Type of surface Injuries Slope of surface Movement habits Wind Pregnancy Gravity State of mind Environment Motion Capture 푛 Sequence of individual frames 푚 = (푓푘)푘=1 Captured information Static body configuration Position in space Orientation of body Silhouette vs. Skeleton Appearance Based Approaches Eadweard Muybridge, 1878 Boys Playing Leapfrog, printed 1887 Appearance Base Approaches Originally only regular video cameras, CCTV Silhouette oriented 푓푘 ≔ 퐵푘 푥, 푦 ∈ {0, 1} Silhouette extraction is a common bottleneck Model Based Approaches Additional abstraction – 2D, 3D Stick figure, volumetric model, … Skeleton Joint (or end-effector), Bone Undirected acyclic graph 퐽 – tree Joint ~ Vertex, Bone ~ Edge 3×|푉 퐽 | Static configuration ~ Pose 푝 ∈ ℝ 푛 푛 푚 = (푓푘)푘=1= (푝푘)푘=1 Motion Capture Devices Optical Both, appearance and Markerless model based approaches Invasive Inertial Magnetic Only model based Mechanical approaches Radio frequency Optical Markerless MoCap Devices 3D scene reconstruction Multiple views Depth sensors RGB stereoscopic cameras Multiple synchronized cameras Additional sensors Silhouette extraction Depth sensing IR camera, ranging sensor Ranging Sensor - Triangulation Laser
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 1: Course Introduction and Overview
    MIT Media Lab MAS 131/ 531 Computational Camera & Photography: Camera Culture Ramesh Raskar MIT Media Lab http://cameraculture.media.mit.edu/ MIT Media Lab Image removed due to copyright restrictions. Photo of airplane propeller, taken with iPhone and showing aliasing effect: http://scalarmotion.wordpress.com/2009/03/15/propeller-image-aliasing/ Shower Curtain: Diffuser Courtesy of Shree Nayar. Used with permission. Source: http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/CAVE/projects/ separation/occluders_gallery.php Direct Global A Teaser: Dual Photography Projector Photocell Figure by MIT OpenCourseWare. Images: Projector by MIT OpenCourseWare. Scene Photocell courtesy of afternoon_sunlight on Flickr. Scene courtesy of sbpoet on Flickr. A Teaser: Dual Photography Projector Photocell Figure by MIT OpenCourseWare. Images: Projector by MIT OpenCourseWare. Scene Photocell courtesy of afternoon_sunlight on Flickr. Scene courtesy of sbpoet on Flickr. A Teaser: Dual Photography Projector Camera Figure by MIT OpenCourseWare. Scene Images: Projector and camera by MIT OpenCourseWare. Scene courtesy of sbpoet on Flickr. The 4D transport matrix: Contribution of each projector pixel to each camera pixel projector camera Figure by MIT OpenCourseWare. Photo courtesy of sbpoet on Flickr. Scene Images: Projector and camera by MIT OpenCourseWare. Scene courtesy of sbpoet on Flickr. The 4D transport matrix: Contribution of each projector pixel to each camera pixel projector camera Figure by MIT OpenCourseWare. Scene Images: Projector and camera by MIT OpenCourseWare. Sen et al, Siggraph 2005 Scene courtesy of sbpoet on Flickr. The 4D transport matrix: Which projector pixel contributes to each camera pixel projector camera Figure by MIT OpenCourseWare. ? Scene Images: Projector and camera by MIT OpenCourseWare. Sen et al, Siggraph 2005 Scene courtesy of sbpoet on Flickr.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article Human Depth Sensors-Based Activity Recognition Using Spatiotemporal Features and Hidden Markov Model for Smart Environments
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Computer Networks and Communications Volume 2016, Article ID 8087545, 11 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8087545 Research Article Human Depth Sensors-Based Activity Recognition Using Spatiotemporal Features and Hidden Markov Model for Smart Environments Ahmad Jalal,1 Shaharyar Kamal,2 and Daijin Kim1 1 Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang, Republic of Korea 2KyungHee University, Suwon, Republic of Korea Correspondence should be addressed to Ahmad Jalal; [email protected] Received 30 June 2016; Accepted 15 September 2016 Academic Editor: Liangtian Wan Copyright © 2016 Ahmad Jalal et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Nowadays, advancements in depth imaging technologies have made human activity recognition (HAR) reliable without attaching optical markers or any other motion sensors to human body parts. This study presents a depth imaging-based HAR system to monitor and recognize human activities. In this work, we proposed spatiotemporal features approach to detect, track, and recognize human silhouettes using a sequence of RGB-D images. Under our proposed HAR framework, the required procedure includes detection of human depth silhouettes from the raw depth image sequence, removing background noise, and tracking of human silhouettes using frame differentiation constraints of human motion information. These depth silhouettes extract the spatiotemporal features based on depth sequential history, motion identification, optical flow, and joints information. Then, these features are processed by principal component analysis for dimension reduction and better feature representation.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple View Geometry for Video Analysis and Post-Production
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2006 Multiple View Geometry For Video Analysis And Post-production Xiaochun Cao University of Central Florida Part of the Computer Sciences Commons, and the Engineering Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Doctoral Dissertation (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Cao, Xiaochun, "Multiple View Geometry For Video Analysis And Post-production" (2006). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 815. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/815 MULTIPLE VIEW GEOMETRY FOR VIDEO ANALYSIS AND POST-PRODUCTION by XIAOCHUN CAO B.E. Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1999 M.E. Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2002 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in the College of Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2006 Major Professor: Dr. Hassan Foroosh °c 2006 by Xiaochun Cao ABSTRACT Multiple view geometry is the foundation of an important class of computer vision techniques for simultaneous recovery of camera motion and scene structure from a set of images. There are numerous important applications in this area. Examples include video post-production, scene reconstruction, registration, surveillance, tracking, and segmentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Microsoft Kinect 360 and Microsoft Kinect One for Robotics and Computer Vision Applications
    UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI PADOVA DIPARTIMENTO DI INGEGNERIA DELL’INFORMAZIONE Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Ingegneria Informatica Tesi di Laurea Evaluation of Microsoft Kinect 360 and Microsoft Kinect One for robotics and computer vision applications Student: Simone Zennaro Advisor: Prof. Emanuele Menegatti Co-Advisor: Dott. Ing. Matteo Munaro 9 Dicembre 2014 Anno Accademico 2014/2015 Dedico questa tesi ai miei genitori che in questi duri anni di studio mi hanno sempre sostenuto e supportato nelle mie decisioni. 2 Gli scienziati sognano di fare grandi cose. Gli ingegneri le realizzano. James A. Michener 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Kinect XBOX 360 ............................................................................................................................ 7 1.1.1 Principle of depth measurement by triangulation ................................................................ 7 1.2 Kinect XBOX ONE ........................................................................................................................ 10 1.2.1 Principle of depth measurement by time of flight .............................................................. 13 1.2.2 Driver and SDK ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE Tof CAMERAS
    NEW SENSORS FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE METRIC SURVEY: THE ToF CAMERAS Filiberto CHIABRANDO1, Dario PIATTI2, Fulvio RINAUDO2 1Politecnico di Torino, DINSE Viale Mattioli 39, 10125 Torino, Italy, [email protected] 2 Politecnico di Torino, DITAG Corso Duca Degli Abruzzi 24 , 10129 Torino, Italy, [email protected], [email protected] Keywords: Time-of-Flight, RIM, calibration, metric survey, 3D modeling Abstract: ToF cameras are new instruments based on CCD/CMOS sensors which measure distances instead of radiometry. The resulting point clouds show the same properties (both in terms of accuracy and resolution) of the point clouds acquired by means of traditional LiDAR devices. ToF cameras are cheap instruments (less than 10.000 €) based on video real time distance measurements and can represent an interesting alternative to the more expensive LiDAR instruments. In addition, the limited weight and dimensions of ToF cameras allow a reduction of some practical problems such as transportation and on-site management. Most of the commercial ToF cameras use the phase-shift method to measure distances. Due to the use of only one wavelength, most of them have limited range of application (usually about 5 or 10 m). After a brief description of the main characteristics of these instruments, this paper explains and comments the results of the first experimental applications of ToF cameras in Cultural Heritage 3D metric survey. The possibility to acquire more than 30 frames/s and future developments of these devices in terms of use of more than one wavelength to overcome the ambiguity problem allow to foresee new interesting applications. 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ptzoptics VL-ZCAM
    PTZOptics VL-ZCAM User Manual Model Nos: PTVL-ZCAM V1.3 (English) Please check PTZOPTICS.com for the most up to date version of this document Rev 1.3 7/19 Preface Thank you for using the HD Professional Video Conferencing Camera. This manual introduces the function, installation and operation of the HD camera. Prior to installation and usage, please read the manual thoroughly. Precautions This product can only be used in the specified conditions in order to avoid any damage to the camera: • Don’t subject the camera to rain or moisture. • Don’t remove the cover. Removal of the cover may result in an electric shock, in addition to voiding the warranty. In case of abnormal operation, contact the manufacturer. • Never operate outside of the specified operating temperature range, humidity, or with any other power supply than the one originally provided with the camera. • Please use a soft dry cloth to clean the camera. If the camera is very dirty, clean it with diluted neutral detergent; do not use any type of solvents, which may damage the surface. Note This is an FCC Class A Digital device. As such, unintentional electromagnetic radiation may affect the image quality of TV in a home environment. Page i of 44 Rev 1.3 7/19 Table of Contents 1 Supplied Accessories ··································································································· 1 2 Notes ······················································································································ 1 4 Features ···················································································································
    [Show full text]
  • User Manual Model No: PTEPTZ-ZCAM-G2 V1.3 (English)
    PTZOptics EPTZ ZCAM G2 User Manual Model No: PTEPTZ-ZCAM-G2 V1.3 (English) Please check PTZOPTICS.com for the most up to date version of this document Rev 1.3 10/20 Preface Thank you for purchasing a PTZOptics Camera. This manual introduces the function, installation and operation of the camera. Prior to installation and usage, please read the manual thoroughly. Precautions This product can only be used in the specified conditions in order to avoid any damage to the camera: • Don’t subject the camera to rain or moisture. • Don’t remove the cover. Removal of the cover may result in an electric shock, in addition to voiding the warranty. In case of abnormal operation, contact the manufacturer. • Never operate outside of the specified operating temperature range, humidity, or with any other power supply than the one originally provided with the camera. • Please use a soft dry cloth to clean the camera. If the camera is very dirty, clean it with diluted neutral detergent; do not use any type of solvents, which may damage the surface. Note This is an FCC Class A Digital device. As such, unintentional electromagnetic radiation may affect the image quality of TV in a home environment. Warranty PTZOptics includes a limited parts & labor warranty for all PTZOptics manufactured cameras. Warranty lengths are shown below. The warranty is valid only if PTZOptics receives proper notice of such defects during the warranty period. PTZOptics, at its option, will repair or replace products that prove to be defective. PTZOptics manufactures its hardware products from parts and components that are new or equivalent to new in accordance with industry standard practices.
    [Show full text]
  • E2 User Manual
    Z CAM E2 User Manual v0.6 Draft (Firmware 0.89) 1. Introduction 1.1. Camera Introduction 1.2. LCD Screen The content displayed on the LCD Screen will be different when the camera is in different mode. Standby & Recording Preview Press FN + OK button when the camera is in Standby mode, it will switch to Preview mode. Press FN + OK again to come back to Standby mode. Playback Short press Power button when the camera is in Standby / Preview mode, it will switch to Playback mode. Short press Power button again to come back to Standby / Preview mode. 1.3. LED Indicator Status Green : Standby Red : Recording. Flashing Red (every 1s) : No memory card. Flashing Red (every 0.5s) : Memory card is full. Flashing Red (every 0.2s) : Camera overheat. Flashing Red (very fast) : Critical error. Flashing Red (fast & slow alternant) : Low battery 1.4. Buttons MENU: Camera setting. FN / ISO: FN or ISO quick setting (2.1 Quick Settings). Up / SHT: Up selection (or add value) or Shutter Speed / Shutter Angle quick setting (2.1 Quick Settings). Down / EV: Down selection (or reduce value) or EV quick setting (2.1 Quick Settings). OK: Confirmation or to trigger the AF function (2.1 Quick Settings). F1: AEL (Auto Exposure Lock) by default, can be changed to other quick settings (2.10 System - Fn). F2: Load profile by default, can be changed to other quick settings (2.10 System - Fn). F3: Aperture quick setting by default, can be changed to other quick settings (2.10 System - Fn). Power button: Long press for 3 seconds to power on / off the camera, short press to switch to / back from Playback mode.
    [Show full text]