Systemwall: an Isolated Firewall Using Hardware-Based Memory Introspection

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Systemwall: an Isolated Firewall Using Hardware-Based Memory Introspection SystemWall: An Isolated Firewall using Hardware-based Memory Introspection Sebastian Biedermann1 and Jakub Szefer2 1 Security Engineering Group Department of Computer Science Technische Universit¨atDarmstadt [email protected] 2 Computer Architecture and Security Laboratory Department of Electrical Engineering Yale University [email protected] Abstract. Memory introspection can be a powerful tool for analyz- ing contents of a system's memory for any malicious code. Current ap- proaches based on memory introspection have focused on Virtual Ma- chines and using a privileged software entity, such as a hypervisor, to perform the introspection. Such software-based introspection, however, is susceptible to variety of attacks that may compromise the hypervi- sor and the introspection code. Furthermore, a hypervisor setup is not always wanted. In this work, we present a hardware-based approach to memory introspection. Dedicated hardware is introduced to read and analyze memory of the target system, independent of any hypervisor or OSes running on the system. We apply the new hardware approach to memory introspection to built-up an architecture that uses DMA and fine-grained memory introspection techniques in order to match network connections to the application-layer while being isolated and undetected from the operating system or the hypervisor. We call the proposed archi- tecture SystemWall since it can be a standalone physical device which can be added as an expansion card to the mother board or a dedicated external box. The architecture is transparent and cannot be manipulated or deactivated by potential malware on the target system. We use the SystemWall in the evaluation to analyze the target system for malicious code and prevent unknown (malicious) applications from establishing network connections which can be used to spread viruses, spam or mal- ware and to leak sensitive information. 1 Introduction Memory introspection is a powerful technique for analyzing code and data con- tained in memory of a running system. Past approaches have focused on Virtual Machine (VM) based introspection techniques. In this work, we present another type of introspection, based on dedicated hardware components and software that can perform the introspection independent of any software running on the target system. We apply the introspection techniques to build the SystemWall, a firewall- like system that can analyze memory of the running target computer, detect malicious or unknown applications and block their connections to the external world. This can prevent spread of viruses, malware, spam or even leakage of sensitive documents by malicious, unknown applications. SystemWall is logically fully external to the target computer system: it can be implemented as a stand- alone box that connects to target system or a dedicated extension card on the motherboard. 1.1 Security through Firewalls In general, firewalls are either an external device only connected to the network or software-based and installed on a target computer. Firewalls control the in- coming and outgoing network traffic depending on network events and predefined rules. Firewalls can be simple packet filters blocking or allowing network packets depending on their header information like the source and the destination. Other firewalls can analyze the content of network packets (deep packet inspection), for example with regular expressions [33], which allows the definition of more sophisticated rules. External firewalls, however, do not have insight into the contents of physical memory of a target system and cannot make decisions based on what code is ac- cessing or handling the network traffic on that system. Software-based firewalls, on the other hand, monitor the network traffic as well as the application-layer of a target computer system and control the incoming and outgoing traffic de- pending on rules which refer to protocols and states of the involved applications. Software-based firewalls are widely used as personal firewalls. However, software- based firewalls are installed on a target system and can be the target of attacks themselves. In particular, malware can successfully execute attacks against the operating system and can manipulate deployed rules, disable or change the mode of the installed software-based firewall's operation. This way, the user does not even notice the infiltration of the operating system and deems the system to be secured by trusting the running firewall and assuming its correct operation. External firewalls with added ability to analyze memory of the target, like software-based firewalls, would combine best of both approaches { this is the motivation for SystemWall design. 1.2 Leveraging DMA for Security DMA (Direct Memory Access) is a specification that allows hardware devices to bypass the Central Processing Unit (CPU) and access the system memory directly. This brings the advantage that the CPU can perform other useful tasks while DMA operations are in progress and it can also accelerate certain tasks. A lot of hardware devices like graphic cards, disk controllers or network cards use DMA. Fig. 1. The SystemWall deployed as an external hardware device which can read the memory of the target and regulate the target's network traffic. Only one ethernet con- nection is shown for the target in this figure, if target has multiple network interfaces, such as two ethernet ports, SystemWall should regulate each ethernet connection. DMA has been the focus of security researchers for some years, because it allows to dump the memory of a system through certain external interfaces while bypassing the operating system and any software-based security restrictions. In particular, DMA can be exploited by an attacks on unattended, running systems which provide DMA via an external buses like ExpressCard, FireWire or Thunderbolt to create a dump of the memory. Afterwards, the memory dump can be investigated using forensic techniques in order to retrieve passwords or other sensitive information. However, DMA can also be used to increase security of a computer system and prevent numerous attacks. In particular, DMA can be used to transparently read the memory contents via the hardware, contents which can later be analyzed for malicious programs or network connections { as we do in SystemWall. 1.3 SystemWall Overview In this work, we benefit from DMA to setup an isolated firewall-like system which we call SystemWall, shown in Figure 1. The SystemWall can be deployed between the system which it protects and the Internet, and intercept all packets traveling from and to the target system. Placing SystemWall between the Inter- net and the target system allows for it to, for example, delay network packets going to or from the target while the target's memory is analyzed to validate the packets are related to a legitimate, non-malicious application. To perform the analysis, SystemWall transparently uses DMA and fine-grained memory in- trospection techniques to match detected initiations of new network connections to applications running on the system. It can use application names, hashes or even scan for shellcode to detect malicious applications and prevent them from making network connections. The SystemWall remains undetected from the operating system and is a combination of a personal software-based firewall and hardware-based memory introspection. This way, the SystemWall cannot be manipulated or disabled by potential malware which could infect the system. Given its access to target's memory, it can monitor the applications and control network connections of these applications to prevent spread of malware, viruses or potentially leakage of sensitive files. Figure 1 shows a block diagram of the SystemWall architecture, fully described in Section 3. 1.4 Paper Organization The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 presents related work. Section 3 explains the architecture and details of the SystemWall imple- mentation. Section 4 evaluates the proposed architecture and Section 5 discusses limitations. Finally, Section 6 concludes. 2 Related Work This section presents related work in the field of physical memory acquisition with the help of hardware extensions, attacks based on this, countermeasures and methods that use DMA for other purposes. Furthermore, we list some related work in the field of tamper-resistant security architectures that can run isolated from the target system and that are based on hardware extensions or a hypervisor setup. 2.1 Physical Memory Acquisition DMA has been previously exploited to execute attacks against a running system. Attackers have used buses like USB, FireWire, Thunderbolt or PCMCIA cards to transparently acquire the volatile memory of a running system without being detected and without being the subject to software-based control mechanisms. Afterwards, the memory dump can be analyzed for sensitive data like passwords. However, attackers can also write to the memory pages of the running system and this way modify the system's properties or work-flow on-the-fly. For example, a Windows 7 kernel can be directly manipulated in the memory in order to allow an attacker to log-in using a blank password [2]. Nowadays, standard DMA attacks and further procedures are even implemented in exploitation frameworks [7]. As a consequence of these attacks, several countermeasures have been sug- gested and are of interest, e.g., [23] or [24]. In particular, hardware-based mem- ory acquisition of specific memory regions can be prevented by modifying the processor's North Bridge's memory map [22]. Also, malware that uses DMA to infiltrate an operating system can be detected using techniques such as those presented by [29] or [28]. Furthermore, memory acquisition can be also used for non-attacking pur- poses, for example for the transparent acquisition and analysis of volatile mem- ory of a compromised system [8]. Seger et al. [26] presented a memory sampling mechanism based on DMA using a GPU coprocessor as an extension. Schwarz et al. [25] presented an architecture that prevents virtual guest machines access- ing memory regions of other virtual guest machines using DMA only by using software and standard hardware.
Recommended publications
  • Top 10 Cyber Crime Prevention Tips
    Top 10 Cyber Crime Prevention Tips 1. Use Strong Passwords Use different user ID / password combinations for different accounts and avoid writing them down. Make the passwords more complicated by combining letters, numbers, special characters (minimum 10 characters in total) and change them on a regular basis. 2. Secure your computer o Activate your firewall Firewalls are the first line of cyber defense; they block connections to unknown or bogus sites and will keep out some types of viruses and hackers. o Use anti-virus/malware software Prevent viruses from infecting your computer by installing and regularly updating anti-virus software. o Block spyware attacks Prevent spyware from infiltrating your computer by installing and updating anti- spyware software. 3. Be Social-Media Savvy Make sure your social networking profiles (e.g. Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, MSN, etc.) are set to private. Check your security settings. Be careful what information you post online. Once it is on the Internet, it is there forever! 4. Secure your Mobile Devices Be aware that your mobile device is vulnerable to viruses and hackers. Download applications from trusted sources. 5. Install the latest operating system updates Keep your applications and operating system (e.g. Windows, Mac, Linux) current with the latest system updates. Turn on automatic updates to prevent potential attacks on older software. 6. Protect your Data Use encryption for your most sensitive files such as tax returns or financial records, make regular back-ups of all your important data, and store it in another location. 7. Secure your wireless network Wi-Fi (wireless) networks at home are vulnerable to intrusion if they are not properly secured.
    [Show full text]
  • Trojans and Malware on the Internet an Update
    Attitude Adjustment: Trojans and Malware on the Internet An Update Sarah Gordon and David Chess IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center Yorktown Heights, NY Abstract This paper continues our examination of Trojan horses on the Internet; their prevalence, technical structure and impact. It explores the type and scope of threats encountered on the Internet - throughout history until today. It examines user attitudes and considers ways in which those attitudes can actively affect your organization’s vulnerability to Trojanizations of various types. It discusses the status of hostile active content on the Internet, including threats from Java and ActiveX, and re-examines the impact of these types of threats to Internet users in the real world. Observations related to the role of the antivirus industry in solving the problem are considered. Throughout the paper, technical and policy based strategies for minimizing the risk of damage from various types of Trojan horses on the Internet are presented This paper represents an update and summary of our research from Where There's Smoke There's Mirrors: The Truth About Trojan Horses on the Internet, presented at the Eighth International Virus Bulletin Conference in Munich Germany, October 1998, and Attitude Adjustment: Trojans and Malware on the Internet, presented at the European Institute for Computer Antivirus Research in Aalborg, Denmark, March 1999. Significant portions of those works are included here in original form. Descriptors: fidonet, internet, password stealing trojan, trojanized system, trojanized application, user behavior, java, activex, security policy, trojan horse, computer virus Attitude Adjustment: Trojans and Malware on the Internet Trojans On the Internet… Ever since the city of Troy was sacked by way of the apparently innocuous but ultimately deadly Trojan horse, the term has been used to talk about something that appears to be beneficial, but which hides an attack within.
    [Show full text]
  • Civilians in Cyberwarfare: Conscripts
    Civilians in Cyberwarfare: Conscripts Susan W. Brenner* with Leo L. Clarke** ABSTRACT Civilian-owned and -operated entities will almost certainly be a target in cyberwarfare because cyberattackers are likely to be more focused on undermining the viability of the targeted state than on invading its territory. Cyberattackers will probably target military computer systems, at least to some extent, but in a departure from traditional warfare, they will also target companies that operate aspects of the victim nation’s infrastructure. Cyberwarfare, in other words, will penetrate the territorial borders of the attacked state and target high-value civilian businesses. Nation-states will therefore need to integrate the civilian employees of these (and perhaps other) companies into their cyberwarfare response structures if a state is to be able to respond effectively to cyberattacks. While many companies may voluntarily elect to participate in such an effort, others may decline to do so, which creates a need, in effect, to conscript companies for this purpose. This Article explores how the U.S. government can go about compelling civilian cooperation in cyberwarfare without violating constitutional guarantees and limitations on the power of the Legislature and the Executive. * NCR Distinguished Professor of Law and Technology, University of Dayton School of Law. ** Associate, Drew, Cooper & Anding, P.C., Grand Rapids, Michigan. 1011 1012 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law [Vol. 43:1011 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cyber War and Deterrence Applying a General Theoretical Framework
    Cyber War and Deterrence Applying a General Theoretical Framework Capt Isaac Nacita, USAF Lt Col Mark Reith, USAF, PhD Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed or implied in the Journal are those of the authors and should not be con- strued as carrying the official sanction of the Department of Defense, Air Force, Air Education and Training Command, Air University, or other agencies or departments of the US government. This article may be reproduced in whole or in part without permission. If it is reproduced, the Air and Space Power Journal requests a courtesy line. Introduction Military history, when superficially studied, will furnish arguments in support of any theory or opinion. —Paul Bronsart von Schellendorf In September 1870, after just six weeks of what many thought would be a pro- longed war, Prussian bystanders jeered Louis-Napoléon Bonaparte as he was carried to captivity in what is now Kassel, Germany. It was a fitting portrait of French na- tional disgrace.1 Their military structures before the war and lack of strategic plan- ning were partly to blame. National archivist Dallas D. Irvine points out, “it (the French system) was almost completely effective in excluding the army’s brain power from the staff and high command. To the resulting lack of intelligence at the top can be ascribed all the inexcusable defects of French military policy.”2 Never- theless, influenced by the idea that France had lost due to its lack of morale that an offensive approach would have provided, the military regrouped and refocused it- self, this time adopting “attaque á outrance.” This doctrine was French military strategy entering World War I, and it was almost immediately proved spectacularly wrong.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Computer Trojan Horse Virus and Its Prevention ZHU Zhenfang
    International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences (IJEAS) ISSN: 2394-3661, Volume-2, Issue-8, August 2015 Study on Computer Trojan Horse Virus and Its Prevention ZHU Zhenfang to steal or viciously revise files, spy system information, steal various commands and passwords, and even format users’ Abstract— In recent years, the fast development of computer hardware. In addition, Trojan horse virus usually records network technology, has become an integral part of human’s life, keyboard operation by means of keyboard record, and then work and study. But with the popularity of the Internet, obtains the account and password of E-bank. Attackers can computer viruses, Trojans and other new terms have become some well-known network vocabularies. Studies have shown directly steal users’ wealth by obtaining accounts and that most users of computer are more or less suffered from passwords. On the other hand, Trojan horse can also cause the computer virus. So people must attach great importance to the native machine be affected by other vicious virus. network security problem. The paper studied Trojan virus. Paper first introduced the concept, characteristics and PREVENTION OF HORSE VIRUS categories of the Trojan virus and its harm, and then focused on the way and means of the Trojan’s spread. It introduced the According to the above introduction, we know that Trojan virus loading and hiding technology, too. Its last part Trojan horse virus is very dangerous. If we neglect the focused on the prevention measures, it put forward reasonable prevention, our computer may be easily attacked. For the suggestions to users, and paper also put forward prevention prevention of Trojan intrusion, Trojan intrusion should be advice to improve network security.
    [Show full text]
  • A Model of Stateful Firewalls and Its Properties
    A Model of Stateful Firewalls and its Properties Mohamed G. Gouda and Alex X. Liu1 Department of Computer Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712-1188, U.S.A. Email: {gouda, alex}@cs.utexas.edu Abstract deployed in most businesses and institutions for securing private networks. A firewall is placed at the point of entry We propose the first model of stateful firewalls. In this between a private network and the outside Internet so that model, each stateful firewall has a variable set called the all incoming and outgoing packets have to pass through it. state of the firewall, which is used to store some packets The function of a firewall is to map each incoming or out- that the firewall has accepted previously and needs to re- going packet to one of a set of predefined decisions, such as member in the near future. Each stateful firewall consists of accept or discard. Based on how a decision is made for ev- two sections: a stateful section and a stateless section. Upon ery packet, firewalls are categorized into stateless firewalls receiving a packet, the firewall processes it in two steps. In and stateful firewalls. If a firewall decides the fate of every the first step, the firewall augments the packet with an ad- packet solely by examining the packet itself, then the fire- ditional field called the tag, and uses the stateful section to wall is called a stateless firewall. If a firewall decides the compute the value of this field according to the current state fate of some packets not only by examining the packet it- of the firewall.
    [Show full text]
  • Stateful Firewalls
    05 7376 ch03 2/11/05 2:14 PM Page 55 3 Stateful Firewalls THE FOCUS OF THIS CHAPTER IS ON STATEFUL firewalls, a type of firewall that attempts to track the state of network connections when filtering packets.The stateful firewall’s capabilities are somewhat of a cross between the functions of a packet filter and the additional application-level protocol intelligence of a proxy. Because of this additional protocol knowledge, many of the problems encountered when trying to configure a packet-filtering firewall for protocols that behave in nonstandard ways (as mentioned in Chapter 2,“Packet Filtering”) are bypassed. This chapter discusses stateful filtering, stateful inspection, and deep packet inspection, as well as state when dealing with various transport and application-level protocols.We also demonstrate some practical examples of how several vendors implement state track- ing as well as go over examples of such firewalls. How a Stateful Firewall Works The stateful firewall spends most of its cycles examining packet information in Layer 4 (transport) and lower. However, it also offers more advanced inspection capabilities by targeting vital packets for Layer 7 (application) examination, such as the packet that ini- tializes a connection. If the inspected packet matches an existing firewall rule that per- mits it, the packet is passed and an entry is added to the state table. From that point forward, because the packets in that particular communication session match an existing state table entry, they are allowed access without call for further application layer inspec- tion.Those packets only need to have their Layer 3 and 4 information (IP address and TCP/UDP port number) verified against the information stored in the state table to confirm that they are indeed part of the current exchange.This method increases overall firewall performance (versus proxy-type systems, which examine all packets) because only initiating packets need to be unencapsulated the whole way to the application layer.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices: Use of Web Application Firewalls
    OWASP Papers Program Best Practice: Use of Web Application Firewalls Best Practices: Use of Web Application Firewalls Version 1.0.5, March 2008, English translation 25. May 2008 Author: OWASP German Chapter with collaboration from: Maximilian Dermann Mirko Dziadzka Boris Hemkemeier Achim Hoffmann Alexander Meisel Matthias Rohr Thomas Schreiber OWASP Papers Program Best Practice: Use of Web Application Firewalls Abstract Web applications of all kinds, whether online shops or partner portals, have in recent years increasingly become the target of hacker attacks. The attackers are using methods which are specifically aimed at exploiting potential weak spots in the web application software itself – and this is why they are not detected, or are not detected with sufficient accuracy, by traditional IT security systems such as network firewalls or IDS/IPS systems. OWASP develops tools and best practices to support developers, project managers and security testers in the development and operation of secure web applications. Additional protection against attacks, in particular for already productive web applications, is offered by what is still a emerging category of IT security systems, known as Web Application Firewalls (hereinafter referred to simply as WAF), often also called Web Application Shields or Web Application Security Filters. One of the criteria for meeting the security standard of the credit card industry currently in force (PCI DSS - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard v.1.1) for example, is either a regular source code review or the use of a WAF. The document is aimed primarily at technical decision-makers, especially those responsible for operations and security as well as application owners (specialist department, technical application managers) evaluating the use of a WAF.
    [Show full text]
  • Automatic Discovery of Evasion Vulnerabilities Using Targeted Protocol Fuzzing
    Automatic Discovery of Evasion Vulnerabilities Using Targeted Protocol Fuzzing Antti Levomäki Olli-Pekka Niemi Christian Jalio Forcepoint Forcepoint Forcepoint Helsinki, Finland Helsinki, Finland Helsinki, Finland [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract— Network protocol normalization and reassembly is Our goal is to find protocol reassembly problems in the basis of traffic inspection performed by NGFW and IPS middlebox traffic inspection. Most middlebox security devices. Even common network protocols are complex with products are proprietary solutions with no visibility into the multiple possible interpretations for the same traffic sequence. actual inspection process. The inspection behaviour also We present a novel method for automated discovery of errors in changes with signature updates, inspection policy changes and traffic normalization by targeted protocol stack fuzzing. These software upgrades. The inspection process is therefore a black errors can be used by attackers to evade detection and bypass box for testing purposes. security devices. The search space for different ways to send a network Keywords—network; intrusion prevention; evasion; fuzzing; exploit is large. The traffic for a relatively simple HTTP GET IDS; IPS; NGFW request is composed following at least the following specifications: I. INTRODUCTION •RFC 2616 – Hypertext Transfer Protocol HTTP/1.1 [3]. Network security devices perform real-time analysis on •RFC 793 - Transmission Control Protocol [4]. network traffic to detect malicious or unwanted traffic. •RFC 791 – Internet Protocol [5]. Intrusion prevention systems (IPS) and next generation firewalls (NGFW) are common examples of middlebox Many protocols also have commonly implemented systems that can alert and possibly terminate offending traffic. extensions increasing the complexity.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines on Firewalls and Firewall Policy
    Special Publication 800-41 Revision 1 Guidelines on Firewalls and Firewall Policy Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Karen Scarfone Paul Hoffman NIST Special Publication 800-41 Guidelines on Firewalls and Firewall Revision 1 Policy Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Karen Scarfone Paul Hoffman C O M P U T E R S E C U R I T Y Computer Security Division Information Technology Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8930 September 2009 U.S. Department of Commerce Gary Locke, Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology Patrick D. Gallagher, Deputy Director GUIDELINES ON FIREWALLS AND FIREWALL POLICY Reports on Computer Systems Technology The Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) promotes the U.S. economy and public welfare by providing technical leadership for the nation’s measurement and standards infrastructure. ITL develops tests, test methods, reference data, proof of concept implementations, and technical analysis to advance the development and productive use of information technology. ITL’s responsibilities include the development of technical, physical, administrative, and management standards and guidelines for the cost-effective security and privacy of sensitive unclassified information in Federal computer systems. This Special Publication 800-series reports on ITL’s research, guidance, and outreach efforts in computer security and its collaborative activities with industry, government, and academic organizations. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-41 Revision 1 Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 800-41 rev1, 48 pages (Sep. 2009) Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately.
    [Show full text]
  • Informational Supplement Best Practices on Spyware Prevention and Detection the Internet Has Become a Popular Method for Both C
    Informational Supplement Best Practices on Spyware Prevention and Detection The Internet has become a popular method for both conducting business and managing finances through online banking relationships. While most financial institutions and some individuals have taken steps to protect their computers, many firewall and anti-virus software packages do not protect computers from one of the latest threats, “spyware” – a form of software that collects personal and confidential information about a person or organization without their proper knowledge or informed consent, and reports it to a third party. This informational supplement describes the various challenges and best practices related to spyware. Financial institutions should consider these recommendations to prevent and detect spyware on both bank-owned and customer computers. Spyware Infection Spyware is usually installed without a user’s knowledge or permission. However, users may intentionally install spyware without understanding the full ramifications of their actions. A user may be required to accept an End User Licensing Agreement (EULA), which often does not clearly inform the user about the extent or manner in which information is collected. In such cases, the software is installed without the user’s “informed consent.” Spyware can be installed through the following methods: • Downloaded with other Internet downloads in a practice called “bundling.” In many cases, all the licensing agreements may be included in one pop-up window that, unless read carefully, may leave the user unaware of “bundled” spyware. • Directly downloaded by users who were persuaded that the technology offers a benefit. Some spyware claims to offer increased productivity, virus scanning capabilities or other benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Awareness Newsletter for Security Aware People News
    SecuritytheAwareness security awareness newsletter for security aware people News The Human Firewall Manifesto The 5 Principles of Being a Human Firewall Proactive Security Awareness How Human Firewalls Stop Cybercrime © 2021 The Security Awareness Company - KnowBe4, Inc. All rights reserved. Company - KnowBe4, Inc. Awareness The Security © 2021 The 5 Principles of Being a Human Firewall The concept behind the human firewall was built on the most critical aspect of security: people. When we talk about preventing data breaches and other incidents, we’re talking about protecting people, not computers. It’s easy to view data as some faceless, lifeless asset that resides on hard drives and servers. In reality, every bit of that data represents a person. Data equals someone’s identity—their digital DNA. And it’s not computers trying to steal those identities. It’s evil people. That’s why we need good human firewalls who remain vigilant in the fight against cybercrime. It’s the human firewall’s job to prioritize security in every facet of life and make the world a better place for everyone. How do you do that? By living and working according to these five security awareness principles: 1. Never make assumptions. Don’t draw your own conclusions. If you’re unsure of something, reach out. Ask. For example, if you find a USB flash drive, don’t assume someone lost it by accident. Turn that flash drive in to management so it can be analyzed for malicious software. 2. Stay alert. Situational awareness is the human firewall’s best friend. Keep your guard up.
    [Show full text]